If you are on a budget and want to get the biggest screen possible - QLED is the way to go. The 85-inch Sony X90L is big, bright, with great color and Sony's XR processor. It has been on sale recently for $1999.99. I think this TV is perfect for that basement Media room or home theater. OLED sample videos of brilliantly lit flowers against the inky back of deep space are impressive, but you rarely see things like that in real content.
@@leifaregis2554 If it's not a QLED panel, I certainly cannot tell. The color is just as vibrant as the 82 inch Samsung Q70R TV that I had to replace (and that was QLED) It's not a mini-led panel - with far fewer local dimming zones. But as you said the processor is excellent at making the best use of the zones that are there.
@@ericmatthews8497 yup not a QLED but the fact you didn't notice says how good the X90Ls are, and how good LCD tech in general has gotten. I'm looking to buy the successor to the X90L this year, but a 55". Just want a regular sized TV for my bright living room with Sony processing.
if cash is no object to you or you're only watching movies then OLED is the way to go but if you want a TV that's going to last you 10+ years go with the QLED!
@@notliosandoval let’s see how it goes in terms of price. I don’t need more brightness. I only watch tv (or play) in the evenings. But it’ll be interesting to see. Competition is always welcome. We are the ones winning.
@@j317I can’t speak for newer Sony’s version, but mini led (which Sony invented) have been available for years. My former Samsung 8k had it, but aside from even more brightness, I can’t say that the dimming zones helped with the darks much. Btw, Sony’s last 8k sets utilized the mini led Neo panels. Micro led, on the other hand looks very interesting as they may have the brightness of led, but the same blacks as OLED due to independent pixels.
@@notliosandovalthe way you framed your comment makes it seem like mini-LED is a clear winner, but it still has about a million-to-one contrast ratio compared to OLED’s infinite contrast ratio & absolutely perfect, inky black. If you’re primarily watching in the evenings/nighttime, OLED is the clear winner. Almost nobody wants to blast brightness to the maximum because it doesn’t result in the best cinematic or gaming image. W-OLED or QN-OLED are the true leaders of the future market, if max brightness is someone’s priority, for some reason.
The fact is that the Micro Leds Televisions Displays Technology will definitely last longer than the QD-Oled or the WRGB Oled Organic Material Products degradation Televisions 📺 Displays Technology which is currently available right now. The Micro Leds Displays Technology do not uses a backlighting system to lights up the Leds behind the Televisions Display Screens. The Micro Leds Displays Technology gives their own lights directly from the Micro Leds themselves without a backlighting system, so they gives perfect black-levels in a darker scene of the Television 📺 Display Screens for real. The Micro Leds Displays Technology works just like the Organic Oled Televisions Displays 📺 Technology. The Leds of the Micro Leds Displays Technology uses Sapphire firm compounds to ensures the development of the Micro Leds behind the system Displays are truly protected to give their individual light source! This is truly why Micro Leds Displays Technology are truly far superior to the QD-Oled or the WRGB Oled Organic Material Products degradation Televisions 📺 Displays Technology 📺!❤😂
huge oversight i agree - mini leds allow for a large amount of dimming zones on QLED sets which basically mitigates blooming and allows for high refresh rates....
@@MMarz the dimming zones is like spraying perfume on a poop, it'll still smell bad now that said..... I do agree with mamo878 that it should've still been discussed
@@avengethis97oled TVs may get less hot but oleds will definitely not last as long as a qled, qled TVs are burn in resistant unlike there counterpart if oled which it's resistance fades over time and they burn in and fail
burn on will always be an issue for oleds, the leds degrade over time and the ones that are lit up longer with static icons wear out quicker, this is what burn in is. is it mico led that is the next tv tech that has the quality of oled without the burn in issues?
I own 4 oleds and my oldest being the LG C9 since release. i haven't had any issues with mine. They are on most the days for the most part because kids don't know how to turn tvs off lol. I can't recommend them enough if they are within your budget. But LG has it now to we're they have made it dummy proof. 😅
It's mind-boggling how persistent this myth is. I have a 2016 EG9100 with 20,000 hours on it. It's *impossible* to see any burn-in, with the sole exception of the faintest taskbar icon burn-in on the red channel only--you can't even see it in the gray screen tests. It's literally impossible to see in normal usage. I've spent the majority of those 20,000 hours in a desktop environment with loads of static imagery. You pretty much need to *deliberately* try to induce burn-in for it to happen in a way that's at all visible outside of test images.
Indeed unless it's next too your eyes QLED is Good Enough even LTT in the last 12 months did a video and without getting super close could not tell the difference on Midrange TV's
8K is truly a gimmick for the long foreseeable future and I wouldn't recommend anyone buy an 8K set for any reason. No content is released in 8K yet and I don't see streaming services jumping on it for at least 5 to 10 years, given the massive bandwidth requirements both for the servers and the client. Not to mention the fact that 8K digital cameras are still exceedingly rare in the professional cinema space, AFAIK. For the foreseeable future, HDR and contrast ratio are much more impactful for picture quality.
I got a lg c2 but hated how dim it was yea blacks were insane but settled with the qn90b from Samsung as it has 85% of the blacks but gets twice as bright
I’m considering going back. I have an LG C8 and starting in year 2 there was noticeable burn-in in the center of the screen where the red pixels fade faster and the center has more green tone.
OLED 'Burn in' is not rare at all. I bought an LG OLED (C6) back in 2016, average usage times and it got burn in after 18mths. Returned under warranty and I swithed to LCD. Fast forward to 2022 and I thought I'd get a new OLED hoping that the advances in technology had fixed the burn in problems. Well, no, they didnt. 9mths old, average use and I start seeing my local Ch7 logo burned into the bottom left of the screen. I'm thinking, "you gotta be kidding me." Well, it just got worse from there. Fortunately, it was under warranty and a service tech came out to have a look and agreed it was terminal. Got a brand new replacement, no issues until March this year, here we go again. Couldn't believe it. Anyways, it's gone and I have a 75" Q-LED on the wall with no issues. Don't get me wrong, the picture quality on the OLED was unbelievable, and it may work for some people, but I will never buy another OLED. If you do buy one, I suggest you get the longest extended warranty available. Just in case. Had my Q-LED 4mths now and very happy with it.
I heard the old style of OLED has hydrogen that caused the burn in hence the H series. OLED. 2nd Gen used deuterium to replace normal hydrogen in the OLED layer. I hope it prevents burn in 🤷🏽♂️
What do you consider average use? I never look at news on my TV so I would never get burn in from that. If all you do is watch shows and movies burn in will not be an issue.
Image retention (temporary illusion of burn in) is a thing on OLED, just like plasma had. Watching the same channel a full day might give you retention of said logo on some patches of colors. Most new oled tv's have some mechanism to counteract this after 10 hours or so screen on time by som undisclosed technique (probably activating all pixels without producing light). This plus pixel shift, wil almost always eliminate the retention. Of course normal burn in still exists on oleds, but almost never after just some months. Almost all of them will also come with logo brightness adjusters in the menu if you tend to leave the tv on 1 channel everyday.
Glad I read this. Was ready to pull the trigger on a 65 Samsung OLED at my BJs for $998. Only thing that kept me hesitant was that it wouldn't fit in my mid sized sedan. I went through the same burn in with my LG phones as I was a fan of their V series flagship phones. After 4 or 5 months I'd see burn in from the home screen icons. They replaced the phone each time but then they started pushing back and saying it's "normal wear" and I was shocked to see that they had no service support in the U.S. for these devices they just probably binned the device and sent you a new one. Then I had issues with my LG Bluetooth necklace earbuds that were kind of expensive and fell apart within warranty and they wouldn't honor the warranty without some overly complicated proof of purchase even when I sent them the Amazon screenshot. Then I had an LG LCD TV where the main board just failed just out of warranty while my Sony Bravia still going strong 12 years on. Also, I have two Samsung Galaxy Tab Ultras 15" OLED that I run nearly 24/7. No burn in whatsoever. Why cant they avoid this on TVs.
An extremely big oversight is not mentioning the different backlight technologies with QLED's An edge lit Samsung QLED is a lot worse than a directly lit TCL QLED with FALD in the same price range. Good contrast ratio is literally one of the determining factors of good image quality, and the backlight system has everything to do with it.
4:24 Nope even Oleds do not look exactly the same at angles. But they do looks much better than their competitors. All in all both are brilliant, and in terms of picture quality QLED can be just as brilliant an option. But combine immaculate blacks with better viewing angles and for most i would say OLED is the one to go for. But both will look better than the TV you bought 8 or more years ago. Because TV technology just as smartphone technology has been refined to perfection in our current age. Yes we will still make improvements. But the drastic change from e.g. my own personaly 10 year old HD TV to an OLED 4K TV especially if it is within a previous 3 years flagship is gonna look stunning. I personally saw the LG OLED in store and was shook at how amazing it looked. It looked like a TV fell outta heaven. This was partially because i don't go to TV stores at all. And this time i went and saw it in all its glory after years of refining the perfect TV. Before this my thoughts were TV's are too expensive for high end stuff. I will stick with 4k Oled Smartphones.
OLED is my choice already had a LG Qled, switch to the LG G2 and can’t complaint perfect for everything for me specially gaming and having G-Sync makes a difference.
@@ajjohnson3416Gsync works with Xbox and AMD PCs. They both use that VRR tech when supported. Playstation doesn't support Gsync in particular, but it still has VRR. It should say enabled when it is. It's the same thing, just different names.
@@ajjohnson3416 Nvidia didn't license their G-sync technology to Sony. Sony had to come up with their own solution. Microsoft however did buy a licence to use N-vidia's proprietary G-sync technology in their console.
Just bought a Samsung QLED for the first time after throwing a VR controller at my 2021 Crystal HD TV. The difference is pretty noticeable, especially on the darker colors. I thought about getting a QLED which uses Samsung's AI to upscale the image, but I am not a fan of Samsung software and the less of it, the better in my mind. Their hardware is top notch and second to none IMHO. Still, I am impressed at how well this TV looks at 1/2 the price of that of an OLED.
@@rockstationgamingDefinitely no. Either save for an 8k OLED or stay with the 4k one. My next TV is gonna be an OLED for sure, all my other devices have those displays and it just looks way better.
@@rockstationgaming Best advice I can give you is go to a tech shop and look at some of the TVs there. In the end it comes down to preference, LEDs have better brightness while OLEDs have fuller colors and the ability to show true black.
I really want an OLED but I just don’t believe they are for my uses. My TV is on literally all day. While I’m at work for my dog and the evening for me. The only rest it gets is at night. It’s a QLED TV purchased in 2018 and it’s still perfectly fine.
@@ishkapiska4516I got a Neo QLED and some of the image quality has been so good and the black levels have been so deep I’d challenge any Oled user to say it’s not as good.
@@ugoewulonu4936if you put the TVs together in a darker room you can tell the difference fairly easily. Oldeds contrast is much deeper but can only bee noticeable in very low light settings.
OLED is overrated imo. You may be able to see the difference in these oled black videos and such, but there's barely any content that makes use of those deep blacks.
Been using Oleds since long time ago but why is it always the black levels... I mean most of the content we watch is not pitch black also OLEDS crush blacks that's something I don't like and peak brightness is not very high also burn in is another issue now days I think Mini Led tvs may actually be better overall. Am still deciding between the Samsung S95C, The Hisense U8N or the TCL QM851.
@@GRE3NT I don't watch TV off angle viewing Angles are not that important in my opinion specially if the TV is only for your personal use. Yes Oled look incredible off angle I own 3 Oleds but I have realized that I never watch the tvs off angle. Not a big deal
@@FenixPajarito all the OLEDs I’ve had the pixels die and leave black spots all over the screen. I’m done with OLED the blacks were great loved it the viewing angles too. Like for example if I got up to go into the kitchen to grab a drink I could still view the tv just fine in great quality and I liked that but I don’t like how every OLED I’ve had fails. I’m looking into the QLED sets I can sacrifice some things if the tv will last.
and what's wrong with glorified LCD? You don't like when they take proven reliable technology and make it better? By that logic, you could say QD-OLED is just glorified OLED. Or Micro-LED..."that's just glorified LED."
@@badpuppy3 that’s like saying “who needs cars when horses are tried-and-true means of transport?” We can put better horseshoes on them and cover their manes in oils that’ll make them nearly perfectly aerodynamic.
I just compared my Qn90b and my LG C3 and the image is more sharper on my Qn90b and for some reason there is a ton of Colorbanding on my C3. It was my first time trying OLED. It's been meh so far.
I bought the winner 70in...500 dollar brand new 3 year warranty tcl uhd tv after comparing oled qled uhd etc..i wouldn't know the original color... I'm not oc... I'm not rich.. I'm happier with this because of the size savings and warranty..n compared to my older tvs.. All tvs now are winners.. I use it only to watch not play games..
I really hate how so many say burn in isn't an issue guys, and it needs to be prolonged exposure of static content for unreasonable amounts of time. No it does not... Burn in is cumulative and it happens due to the pixels wearing out un evenly... So it doesn't need to be a long period of continuous time at all if burn in happens at the 1000 hour mark it will happen regardless of if it was left on 8 hours per day or 30 mins per day. I love my QD OLED and OLED panels but burn in is still very real and still happens even if you take care of them. Its literally inevitable.
Thank you for the video I am a new Best Buy salesmen and needed some of the differences explained so I can better assess what customers might need/want very helpful!
I feel both technologies are great, but I made the mistake to put both in my apartment, just different rooms. Like always comparison is the thief of joy and I love my QLED in the mancave as long as I didn't consume something to recently on the OLED in the living room.
Nada se compara a ver imágenes de videos de UA-cam de animales, de paisajes en 4k, 8k, 12k en un tv Oled, es un placer para los ojos. Acabo de comprar mi primer Tv Oled el C4 de LG y es maravilloso. Negros profundos contrastando con colores vivos, es inigualable.
Just bought Samsung QLED -Q60D -55”. Perfection 👍 replaced my 17 yrs old Panasonic No regrets tho my flat Panasonic still 99% vibrant but not smart TV. Love Samsung 🙏😎❤️
Oleds have great picture but the dead pixel issue is something I just can't justify spending over £1500 on a tv for. Every OLED I have owned has had dead pixels. Screen burn isn't an issue but dead pixels are. I have never had a dead pixel issue until I went OLED.
Spending more than 1k for a tv is still such a wild concept to me. I'll stick to my samsung Qled I got 3 years ago for now until prices aren't insane for oleds
You discussed the burn in from static images that is less of a problem now, but have they made any improvement on the red OLED pixels fading quicker than the others which led to LG panels giving yellows and skin tones a green look, particularly in the center of the screen?
OLED Is better blacks and thinner TV. QLED brighter and generally cheaper. But quality tends to be very similar even though OLED is considered better. Did I get that correct
Thank you so much for the clear explanation, Jon. I am shopping for a new/newer TV to replace my 15 YO Panasonic plasma and your video is very "basic" for me to understand, but very informative!
Last year I purchased a Samsung 95b I also have an lg from 2017. For me the LG now over six years old is the better picture and that’s with all the marketing bullshit with peak brightness.
Fair enough. I've been trying out my first OLED TV for the past year and a half. Daily use, mostly for video games. Lots of static HUD elements. Lots of movies, and even using it as a PC monitor now too. So far, zero issues. Just an amazing image quality that I don't think I'll ever leave again. Modern OLEDs are pretty great at countering burn in. They dim static pixels like logos, subtitles, and game huds. The whole image slowly rotates by a small amount to further prevent static pixels for too long, the run pixel cleaning every 4 hours of use to make sure all pixels are degrading equally. It's pretty hard to get burn in. I've put over a hundred hours into some games with static bright HUDS and there's no issue at all. Of course you can still get burn in if you abuse it hard, but it's not something to worry about unless you have a specific use case of leaving the same image on for a very long time.
This is not a concern on LG OLEDs and hasn't been for years. The issue is theoretical and not applicable to any normal use. Rtings has the data to back it up, since they've actually tested under controlled conditions by looping the same video 24/7 for years on end. Look at their data, if you want an evidence based approach. From anecdotal experience, my LG C9 (which is about 5 years behind current models) has over 8000 hours of use and absolutely no hint of burn in. My two newer LG OLEDs also have no hint of burn in. The same cannot be said for Samsung's QD-OLEDs. Samsung has to get their crap together and I wouldn't recommend one of their sets over an LG W-OLED, for that reason.
@@ultramegax would you recommend Samsung or LG for gaming? i was thinking of getting the C2 i can't see much of a difference picture wise compared to the C3
@@ultramegax i wouldnt say its not a worry for lg oled. rtings test showed all oleds had burn in after 4 months right up to the g3 model. yes this is not normal use but they said it works out to around 18 months of a normal persons use? my g3 was £3100 and i would like and expect to get a lot longer than 18 months before seeing burn in on the screen. i have a plasma in my bedroom that i have had since 2008 and only started to notice lines where black bars have been when the screen is black, i think its more than temp image retention but at 16 years old i cant complain lol hope my g3 lasts this long?
Thank you for this. Here's the problem tho. When you talk about OLED I'm like that's what I want. Then you talk about QLED and I'm like that's what I want haha. I'm a Samsung guy so I probably just get the best model of QLED.
Im in the market for a 43 inch , with the Oled models in smaller sizes still using older panel tech do you recommend mini LEDs TVs specifically for gaming on a PS5 pro and PC?
It's completely understandable. The cost behind the OLED screen is almost impossible to get a half decent TV . QLED are trying to give ordinary people as close to OLED for a reasonable price. Well done guys!
As someone who has a C3 Oled, I bought a Q7 Qled for my living room and the picture quality compared to my oled was absolutely disgraceful. It basically looked just like a regular 4k LED tv. I returned the Qled the very next day. Oled picture quality is light years ahead of Qled and it’s not even close. Very difficult to go back once you get an Oled
If anyone is looking to game on a OLED. I've had the LG C2 Series 4K Smart OLED evo TV for about 2 years and it is hands down the best PC gaming experience I've ever had in my life. I have a liquid cooled 4080 and I push it to the limit gaming at 4K 120hz. The TV is also
by the way regarding QD oled having more image retention: I believe the first test of RTings was flawed because the QD oleds in their test at the time did not run the compensation cycles as often as the LG TV's, when they ran proper compensation cycles it cleared up.
i think all the oleds have burn in with their tests? even after they found out the issue with the samsung there was still an image on the screen, it wasnt as bright after it ran the cycle but it was still there. i seen the lg g3 has burn in after 4 months aswell. think they are all suffering burn in around that time? i know people wont have news on their tv for as long as the test but this proves oled isnt really fit to be used as a tv. lg claim you shouldnt watch a movie with black bars? how can anyone avoid this when almost all movies have black bars? lg say dont watch anything with static icons on screen? again almost all stations have something on screen now. iv owned an lg g3 since last july, so far no problems but its always a worry
@@bawbag3715 Evita las barras negras, ampliando el zoom. En el logotipo cambie el bajo por alto, eso recomienda el manual. Acabo de conseguir el LG C4 y uno disfruta mucho la imagen, pero es cierto que uno se preocupa.
@@tigresa821 hi, thanks for the reply. the problem with zooming in to remover the black bars is that you either stretch the picture up and down which gives you an out of shape picture or you fully zoom the picture all 4 ways but then you lose a lot of the screen on all 4 edges. i do use the zoom when watching football to avoid having the score icons on screen, but we shouldnt really need to be doing things like this to enjoy our tvs
yes this seems to be correct, theres a video showing burn in on a samsung oled, but after rtings figured out and the cycle it helped to fade the burn in, it was still there but not as easy to see
Hello, It mostly depends on your viewing distance. 2,3m = 55 inch and 2,75 = 65 inch. However, I had both QNED tv and now I have OLED tv. I returned the QNED because it was horrible screen quality. Please go with the 55 inch OLED or save some more and get 65 inch oled!! U wont regret it
@@martijn439 How bad is the brightness on an OLED really? It's still brighter than my 2013 32" Samsung LED for $400 right? Or do you really have to close the curtains every time you watch tv on an OLED?
I have old lg c1 oled in my bedroom. I have a s95b in my living room and movie room/Xtra bedroom 😅 but the qleds outperform the oled big time imo. The oled just doesn't get bright enough for me
LG 32" 1080p bought in 2010 (yes back then there were 1080p TVs in 32" size) used it till 2022 when the TV finally just died. And here people are discussing Qled and Oled😮
Oled 100%. I watch movies primary and I was watching them side by side and the image of water was terrible on the Qled. I was like someone had spilled a chemical in the water, with that iridescence look to it. Once you experience, you can't unsee it.
I actually went back to a QLED from an OLED sounds crazy but my OLED failed after only 2 years dead pixels everywhere and the brightness dropped off the face of the earth. I loved the blacks but the QLED set I have dose a pretty good job at showing almost perfect blacks. If the OLED was perfect for black the QLED I have is like 90% black almost perfect and for me that’s okay enough. The extra brightness and colour I get now over my OLED is so much better and HDR so much brighter. I’ll be keeping an eye on the dead pixels thing if I get any but I just want a set that will last longer then 2 years. Hopefully I got one now. Plus the QLED was so much cheaper then the OLED.
I had a lg oled 55" tv fantastic picture quality however ended up with horrendous screen burn / image retention !! so i would never buy an oled tv again !! Ive just purchased a Hisense 65" E7KQTUK PRO QLED tv which is brilliant for next gen gaming VRR / ALLM /FREESYNC PREMIUM 120 / 144 HZ low response time GAMING BAR and DOLBY ATMOS with a subwoofer built into rear of tv BUT MOST OF ALL NO RISK OF SCREEN BURN / IMAGE RETENTION !! i didnt expect the picture quality to be any where near as good as the oled tv but my goodness ive been blown away by the picture quality it is awesome and all this for just £649 !! a £1000 cheaper than an oled its so close to an oled picture that its just not worth paying loads more money for an oled tv im so pleased and can game away without the worry of screen burn !!
John, I came here to find out about TVs, but I want to find out about something very different from you. After watching this video, I'm dying to know what you are using for a camera, what you are using for editing software, and what you are using for your audio. Because I felt the quality of this video that you output was one of the best things I've seen on UA-cam. And I'm so interested to have those answers because I need to start making videos for my company, and I'd love some guidance from you. Could you share that information with me, privately, if you don't want to have it be on this channel?
oled just have drawbacks that are too significant... like image retention and short lifespan... maybe "tandem oled" will help with this... but not the price...a good IPS with QD and a high number of dimming zones is really the only option for me... at least until micro-led or QDEL becomes a thing
We have a 12 year old Panasonic plasma that is so sharp and clear compared to our 2021 Samsung UA8000 LED/LCD. There is no comparison! Will the Sony Bravia 9 mini-led wow us like our plasma?
my humble opinion: your plasma TV looks "sharp and clear" because it has less "pixels" and they have less color range. Your 2021 UA8000 has more resolution but it is a budget panel, therefore you suffer from low contrast and color accuracy. A NEO QLED should give you a much better image quality when compared with your old plasma. Remember that by having more resolution, it will show you much more detail, and sometimes you'll think it's a "blurred" image but in fact it is showing a better image, more tones, less sharpening, which translates in a more realistic result.
The real winner is consumers having good options for both. Want the most mind blowing picture quality and contrast? OLED has you. Want super high brightness and no fear of burn-in because you use it as your monitor? Mini LED has you
Ive owned a 32" CHG70 Gaming Monitor QLED 144 Hz (LC32HG70QQNXZA) for over 4 yrs now and its been awesome for all my gaming and content consumption needs :) Price was decent to about $700 on sale back then at costco. QLEDs are more than reasonable price wise but OLEDs while nice are still pretty expensive. OLEDs should get cheaper so eventually I might try getting one of those but the screen burn-in is still concerning xD
The only downsides of OLED: - brightness lacks compared to miniLED backlit panels - black crush can be an issue because of the above - burn-in is inevitable
WHen it comes to: TV = i always buy SAMSUNG PHONE: I always buy IPHONE Computer monitor screen: I always buy DELL or LG VACUUM cleaner: I always buy DYSON Laptop: I Always buy DELL or LENOVO HIFI SPEAKRES: I buy SONOS MACHINE TOOLS: I only buy DEWALT
There is no better picture quality than an QD OLED tv at the moment and that comes with it's downside which is the price tag, but in the same time it pays off fir what you give. There's no going back agter you lay eyes on a tv like that. It's one way street.
I currently have a samsung qe55s95batxxu - and I’m thinking of going for the qn800d just worried because I would be going from OLED to QLED Would this be a decent upgrade or would I be disappointed?
You got it confused, NEO QLED is MINI-LED ULED IS MINI LED AND QNED IS MINI LED Both Hisense and Samsung have their QLED TVs named as QLED Don’t confuse it people, MINI-LED TVs do have QUANTUM DOT TECHNOLOGY
I’ve read that but I’m skeptical. I work from home and my TV is on all day on a channel with a ticker and logo. I probably hit that avg 6 month user usage in a week.
I’ve currently got two QLEDs Samsung Q80T & QN90B and one OLED LG G2. All three have been great sets and I’m extremely happy with them. This year I might replace my G2 with the 85” Samsung QN900D or whatever the replacement Sony is for last year’s X95L or possibly the 83” G4 and move my G2 into my bedroom.
I recently bought a C3 and i prefer much more the brighness and the image sharpness of my Q95T 2020 model , which it doesn't even have mini LED technology. Q95T was the last model that it was using regular LED.
If you are on a budget and want to get the biggest screen possible - QLED is the way to go. The 85-inch Sony X90L is big, bright, with great color and Sony's XR processor. It has been on sale recently for $1999.99. I think this TV is perfect for that basement Media room or home theater. OLED sample videos of brilliantly lit flowers against the inky back of deep space are impressive, but you rarely see things like that in real content.
But x90L is not qled but got excellent processor although just led.
@@leifaregis2554 If it's not a QLED panel, I certainly cannot tell. The color is just as vibrant as the 82 inch Samsung Q70R TV that I had to replace (and that was QLED)
It's not a mini-led panel - with far fewer local dimming zones. But as you said the processor is excellent at making the best use of the zones that are there.
@@leifaregis2554it's PFS backlight LED, different technology, but the same effect - wide colour gamut
@@ericmatthews8497 yup not a QLED but the fact you didn't notice says how good the X90Ls are, and how good LCD tech in general has gotten. I'm looking to buy the successor to the X90L this year, but a 55". Just want a regular sized TV for my bright living room with Sony processing.
This!! Oled is only like what, 10% better at most, let's be real!
if cash is no object to you or you're only watching movies then OLED is the way to go but if you want a TV that's going to last you 10+ years go with the QLED!
I know QLED are nice, but I can’t give up on OLED. I just love my tv.
Wait till Sony’s new Mini-LED launches this year. 95% of OLED’s dimming capabilities, while getting over twice as bright
@@notliosandoval let’s see how it goes in terms of price. I don’t need more brightness. I only watch tv (or play) in the evenings. But it’ll be interesting to see. Competition is always welcome. We are the ones winning.
@notliosandoval what about a mini oled?
@@j317I can’t speak for newer Sony’s version, but mini led (which Sony invented) have been available for years. My former Samsung 8k had it, but aside from even more brightness, I can’t say that the dimming zones helped with the darks much. Btw, Sony’s last 8k sets utilized the mini led Neo panels.
Micro led, on the other hand looks very interesting as they may have the brightness of led, but the same blacks as OLED due to independent pixels.
@@notliosandovalthe way you framed your comment makes it seem like mini-LED is a clear winner, but it still has about a million-to-one contrast ratio compared to OLED’s infinite contrast ratio & absolutely perfect, inky black. If you’re primarily watching in the evenings/nighttime, OLED is the clear winner. Almost nobody wants to blast brightness to the maximum because it doesn’t result in the best cinematic or gaming image. W-OLED or QN-OLED are the true leaders of the future market, if max brightness is someone’s priority, for some reason.
I'm blown away by looking at normal wallpapers everyday in my lg c2 42, it's like photo frame quality in front of your eyes.. Nothing comes close..
The fact is that the Micro Leds Televisions Displays Technology will definitely last longer than the QD-Oled or the WRGB Oled Organic Material Products degradation Televisions 📺 Displays Technology which is currently available right now. The Micro Leds Displays Technology do not uses a backlighting system to lights up the Leds behind the Televisions Display Screens. The Micro Leds Displays Technology gives their own lights directly from the Micro Leds themselves without a backlighting system, so they gives perfect black-levels in a darker scene of the Television 📺 Display Screens for real. The Micro Leds Displays Technology works just like the Organic Oled Televisions Displays 📺 Technology. The Leds of the Micro Leds Displays Technology uses Sapphire firm compounds to ensures the development of the Micro Leds behind the system Displays are truly protected to give their individual light source!
This is truly why Micro Leds Displays Technology are truly far superior to the QD-Oled or the WRGB Oled Organic Material Products degradation Televisions 📺 Displays Technology 📺!❤😂
@@andrewwallace9485 Nice GPT vibe
@@andrewwallace9485 Is this an advertisement? Cuz it sure sounds like it.
and here I am just having a basic yr 4 yr old 40 inch 1080p Led non smart TV that I only made smart by putting a TV stick on it.
4 year is rookie numbers, I have a 1080p 55" Toshiba from 2011. Still works a charm though.
same, 7 years old 1080p led non smart tv which i made smart by using a fire tv stick 4k
@@lucaswilson30452011? Try a 46” Bravia from 2006.
I have a panasonic 21 inch crt, get on my level:)
i have a panasonic zt 60 plasma tv with some burn in now but still going strong. Got to be 12 yr now
Not one mention of dimming zones for the different types and price ranges of QLED TVs. That is a big oversight.
huge oversight i agree - mini leds allow for a large amount of dimming zones on QLED sets which basically mitigates blooming and allows for high refresh rates....
@@MMarz the dimming zones is like spraying perfume on a poop, it'll still smell bad
now that said..... I do agree with mamo878 that it should've still been discussed
This is pointless. He missed the best part, the main improvement that has happened in the last yr😂😂
TCL 845 55' is priced at around 650$ right now discounted, and looks better than the LG c3 evo or the philips and the same price.
@@nakhashfaiz3623 these have been around quite a bit longer than the past yr
I’m still using my 2018 4k samsung qled, no issues so far 👍
QLED is much cheaper and performs so close to OLED I know where my money is going
Which one is brighter?
@@binichukwujohn8692Qled
@@binichukwujohn8692QLED is usually brighter
Qled is brighter however qled gets hotter and don't last as long as an oled will.
@@avengethis97oled TVs may get less hot but oleds will definitely not last as long as a qled, qled TVs are burn in resistant unlike there counterpart if oled which it's resistance fades over time and they burn in and fail
I chose the QN85C last year over the S90C because I didn’t want to worry about burn in and I heard that OLED pixels can fade/die over time.
Qled is the way to go for me until the burning images are fixed for Oleds TVs .
Great video. Thanks
burn on will always be an issue for oleds, the leds degrade over time and the ones that are lit up longer with static icons wear out quicker, this is what burn in is. is it mico led that is the next tv tech that has the quality of oled without the burn in issues?
OLEDs have had zero risk of burn in for the last few years… that shouldn’t be stopping you! They finally released true QOLEDs last year - Sony A95.
I own 4 oleds and my oldest being the LG C9 since release. i haven't had any issues with mine. They are on most the days for the most part because kids don't know how to turn tvs off lol. I can't recommend them enough if they are within your budget. But LG has it now to we're they have made it dummy proof. 😅
I agree. My LG OLED has image burning.
It's mind-boggling how persistent this myth is.
I have a 2016 EG9100 with 20,000 hours on it. It's *impossible* to see any burn-in, with the sole exception of the faintest taskbar icon burn-in on the red channel only--you can't even see it in the gray screen tests. It's literally impossible to see in normal usage. I've spent the majority of those 20,000 hours in a desktop environment with loads of static imagery.
You pretty much need to *deliberately* try to induce burn-in for it to happen in a way that's at all visible outside of test images.
Qled is good enough
Indeed unless it's next too your eyes QLED is Good Enough even LTT in the last 12 months did a video and without getting super close could not tell the difference on Midrange TV's
8K is truly a gimmick for the long foreseeable future and I wouldn't recommend anyone buy an 8K set for any reason. No content is released in 8K yet and I don't see streaming services jumping on it for at least 5 to 10 years, given the massive bandwidth requirements both for the servers and the client. Not to mention the fact that 8K digital cameras are still exceedingly rare in the professional cinema space, AFAIK. For the foreseeable future, HDR and contrast ratio are much more impactful for picture quality.
Even the 4K regular Samsung TV…once you go O or QLED…it’s impossible to go back…there is a big difference also a big difference IN PRICE-YIKES!
Once you go OLED you can't go back
You can . I've bought LG OLED 3 years ago , now I've bought TCL QD Mini QLED . I have also Samsung QLED .
I got a lg c2 but hated how dim it was yea blacks were insane but settled with the qn90b from Samsung as it has 85% of the blacks but gets twice as bright
I’m considering going back. I have an LG C8 and starting in year 2 there was noticeable burn-in in the center of the screen where the red pixels fade faster and the center has more green tone.
@@seaman5705 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :D
@@jerseytiger1980 maybe you should avoid watching Firefighter and Golf Dokus all Day !!!! ;D
OLED 'Burn in' is not rare at all. I bought an LG OLED (C6) back in 2016, average usage times and it got burn in after 18mths. Returned under warranty and I swithed to LCD.
Fast forward to 2022 and I thought I'd get a new OLED hoping that the advances in technology had fixed the burn in problems. Well, no, they didnt. 9mths old, average use and I start seeing my local Ch7 logo burned into the bottom left of the screen. I'm thinking, "you gotta be kidding me." Well, it just got worse from there. Fortunately, it was under warranty and a service tech came out to have a look and agreed it was terminal. Got a brand new replacement, no issues until March this year, here we go again. Couldn't believe it. Anyways, it's gone and I have a 75" Q-LED on the wall with no issues.
Don't get me wrong, the picture quality on the OLED was unbelievable, and it may work for some people, but I will never buy another OLED. If you do buy one, I suggest you get the longest extended warranty available. Just in case.
Had my Q-LED 4mths now and very happy with it.
I heard the old style of OLED has hydrogen that caused the burn in hence the H series. OLED. 2nd Gen used deuterium to replace normal hydrogen in the OLED layer. I hope it prevents burn in 🤷🏽♂️
on older models it seems
What do you consider average use? I never look at news on my TV so I would never get burn in from that. If all you do is watch shows and movies burn in will not be an issue.
Image retention (temporary illusion of burn in) is a thing on OLED, just like plasma had. Watching the same channel a full day might give you retention of said logo on some patches of colors. Most new oled tv's have some mechanism to counteract this after 10 hours or so screen on time by som undisclosed technique (probably activating all pixels without producing light). This plus pixel shift, wil almost always eliminate the retention.
Of course normal burn in still exists on oleds, but almost never after just some months. Almost all of them will also come with logo brightness adjusters in the menu if you tend to leave the tv on 1 channel everyday.
Glad I read this. Was ready to pull the trigger on a 65 Samsung OLED at my BJs for $998. Only thing that kept me hesitant was that it wouldn't fit in my mid sized sedan. I went through the same burn in with my LG phones as I was a fan of their V series flagship phones. After 4 or 5 months I'd see burn in from the home screen icons. They replaced the phone each time but then they started pushing back and saying it's "normal wear" and I was shocked to see that they had no service support in the U.S. for these devices they just probably binned the device and sent you a new one. Then I had issues with my LG Bluetooth necklace earbuds that were kind of expensive and fell apart within warranty and they wouldn't honor the warranty without some overly complicated proof of purchase even when I sent them the Amazon screenshot. Then I had an LG LCD TV where the main board just failed just out of warranty while my Sony Bravia still going strong 12 years on.
Also, I have two Samsung Galaxy Tab Ultras 15" OLED that I run nearly 24/7. No burn in whatsoever. Why cant they avoid this on TVs.
An extremely big oversight is not mentioning the different backlight technologies with QLED's
An edge lit Samsung QLED is a lot worse than a directly lit TCL QLED with FALD in the same price range.
Good contrast ratio is literally one of the determining factors of good image quality, and the backlight system has everything to do with it.
As a gamer i will go for QLED in OLED most people notices burning in bottom layer.
As i gamer i am racist
@@max3eey hell yeah lfg
@@max3eey🎉🥳
OLED is the only tech worth considering until microLED becomes affordable.
Kamala Harris has just promised her first task will be to make microLED affordable for Americans.
It is affordable. 500 for 75in Samsungs in mini led
4:24 Nope even Oleds do not look exactly the same at angles.
But they do looks much better than their competitors.
All in all both are brilliant, and in terms of picture quality QLED can be just as brilliant an option.
But combine immaculate blacks with better viewing angles and for most i would say OLED is the one to go for.
But both will look better than the TV you bought 8 or more years ago. Because TV technology just as smartphone technology has been refined to perfection in our current age.
Yes we will still make improvements. But the drastic change from e.g. my own personaly 10 year old HD TV to an OLED 4K TV especially if it is within a previous 3 years flagship is gonna look stunning.
I personally saw the LG OLED in store and was shook at how amazing it looked. It looked like a TV fell outta heaven.
This was partially because i don't go to TV stores at all. And this time i went and saw it in all its glory after years of refining the perfect TV.
Before this my thoughts were TV's are too expensive for high end stuff.
I will stick with 4k Oled Smartphones.
OLED is my choice already had a LG Qled, switch to the LG G2 and can’t complaint perfect for everything for me specially gaming and having G-Sync makes a difference.
G-sync only works on pc right? Cah I don't notice it with ps5
@@ajjohnson3416Gsync works with Xbox and AMD PCs. They both use that VRR tech when supported.
Playstation doesn't support Gsync in particular, but it still has VRR. It should say enabled when it is.
It's the same thing, just different names.
@@ajjohnson3416 Nvidia didn't license their G-sync technology to Sony. Sony had to come up with their own solution. Microsoft however did buy a licence to use N-vidia's proprietary G-sync technology in their console.
Just bought a Samsung QLED for the first time after throwing a VR controller at my 2021 Crystal HD TV. The difference is pretty noticeable, especially on the darker colors. I thought about getting a QLED which uses Samsung's AI to upscale the image, but I am not a fan of Samsung software and the less of it, the better in my mind. Their hardware is top notch and second to none IMHO. Still, I am impressed at how well this TV looks at 1/2 the price of that of an OLED.
😂
I have a 4k oled from 2022 and thinking going for 8k qled would this be better ?
@@rockstationgamingDefinitely no. Either save for an 8k OLED or stay with the 4k one. My next TV is gonna be an OLED for sure, all my other devices have those displays and it just looks way better.
@ won’t the picture quality be better though
@@rockstationgaming Best advice I can give you is go to a tech shop and look at some of the TVs there. In the end it comes down to preference, LEDs have better brightness while OLEDs have fuller colors and the ability to show true black.
I really want an OLED but I just don’t believe they are for my uses. My TV is on literally all day. While I’m at work for my dog and the evening for me. The only rest it gets is at night. It’s a QLED TV purchased in 2018 and it’s still perfectly fine.
Mini Led (or NeoQled) might be more your thing then..👀 it’s got contrast close to Oled while being brighter and having no risks of burn-in
@@ishkapiska4516I got a Neo QLED and some of the image quality has been so good and the black levels have been so deep I’d challenge any Oled user to say it’s not as good.
Newer oled TVs resist burn in much better, with the care features it shouldn't be a problem.
@@ugoewulonu4936if you put the TVs together in a darker room you can tell the difference fairly easily. Oldeds contrast is much deeper but can only bee noticeable in very low light settings.
OLED is overrated imo. You may be able to see the difference in these oled black videos and such, but there's barely any content that makes use of those deep blacks.
Been using Oleds since long time ago but why is it always the black levels... I mean most of the content we watch is not pitch black also OLEDS crush blacks that's something I don't like and peak brightness is not very high also burn in is another issue now days I think Mini Led tvs may actually be better overall. Am still deciding between the Samsung S95C, The Hisense U8N or the TCL QM851.
keep in mind dont loose tv box :D without it game over :D
Don't get Hisense or TCL. The viewing angles are crap.
@@GRE3NT I don't watch TV off angle viewing Angles are not that important in my opinion specially if the TV is only for your personal use. Yes Oled look incredible off angle I own 3 Oleds but I have realized that I never watch the tvs off angle. Not a big deal
@@FenixPajarito all the OLEDs I’ve had the pixels die and leave black spots all over the screen. I’m done with OLED the blacks were great loved it the viewing angles too. Like for example if I got up to go into the kitchen to grab a drink I could still view the tv just fine in great quality and I liked that but I don’t like how every OLED I’ve had fails. I’m looking into the QLED sets I can sacrifice some things if the tv will last.
@@sparkiz7108 what do you mean?
Qled Just glorified LCD.....
I agree. My analysis of the thumbnail is that OLED looks MUCH better. It’s a clear winner from what I see there.
and what's wrong with glorified LCD? You don't like when they take proven reliable technology and make it better?
By that logic, you could say QD-OLED is just glorified OLED. Or Micro-LED..."that's just glorified LED."
@@badpuppy3 that’s like saying “who needs cars when horses are tried-and-true means of transport?” We can put better horseshoes on them and cover their manes in oils that’ll make them nearly perfectly aerodynamic.
I just compared my Qn90b and my LG C3 and the image is more sharper on my Qn90b and for some reason there is a ton of Colorbanding on my C3. It was my first time trying OLED. It's been meh so far.
By that logic, OLED is glorified plasma
Since OLED past 1.000 nits with QD OLED and MLA, the best reason to buy an LCD TV is price.
I bought the winner 70in...500 dollar brand new 3 year warranty tcl uhd tv after comparing oled qled uhd etc..i wouldn't know the original color... I'm not oc... I'm not rich..
I'm happier with this because of the size savings and warranty..n compared to my older tvs.. All tvs now are winners..
I use it only to watch not play games..
I really hate how so many say burn in isn't an issue guys, and it needs to be prolonged exposure of static content for unreasonable amounts of time. No it does not... Burn in is cumulative and it happens due to the pixels wearing out un evenly... So it doesn't need to be a long period of continuous time at all if burn in happens at the 1000 hour mark it will happen regardless of if it was left on 8 hours per day or 30 mins per day. I love my QD OLED and OLED panels but burn in is still very real and still happens even if you take care of them. Its literally inevitable.
Thank you for the video I am a new Best Buy salesmen and needed some of the differences explained so I can better assess what customers might need/want very helpful!
I feel both technologies are great, but I made the mistake to put both in my apartment, just different rooms. Like always comparison is the thief of joy and I love my QLED in the mancave as long as I didn't consume something to recently on the OLED in the living room.
I bought a Samsung Neo G7 43" QLED mini-led PC monitor with 144hz refresh rate, it has performed really well, I absolutely love it!
Oh for the good old days...of the B&W television ....the only decision you had to make....was to get the 19" or the 21"😅😅😅
Nada se compara a ver imágenes de videos de UA-cam de animales, de paisajes en 4k, 8k, 12k en un tv Oled, es un placer para los ojos. Acabo de comprar mi primer Tv Oled el C4 de LG y es maravilloso. Negros profundos contrastando con colores vivos, es inigualable.
Just bought Samsung QLED -Q60D -55”. Perfection 👍 replaced my 17 yrs old Panasonic No regrets tho my flat Panasonic still 99% vibrant but not smart TV. Love Samsung 🙏😎❤️
Does OLED still have burn in problems?
Yes , yes and yes. Beware! Any variant of LCD is fine including Qled and regular led.
Oleds have great picture but the dead pixel issue is something I just can't justify spending over £1500 on a tv for. Every OLED I have owned has had dead pixels. Screen burn isn't an issue but dead pixels are.
I have never had a dead pixel issue until I went OLED.
Which 65 or 75 inch TV will last me the longest ?
Good question!
QD-OLED is the best of both, and its not even close
yes sir, no reason to go with anything else if u buying a tv today
You wrong bud I have owned many oled tvs, Mini Led tvs have some advantages now days and that's brighness 🔆 and no burn-in disadvantage.
@@dante19890😂 😂
@@FenixPajarito in hdr a qd oled will get even brighter. There is a reason they win the awards every year at the tv shootout.
Lcd is cope
@@dante19890 Bro you sound more of a Oled fanboy, "LCD is Cope "are you 10?
Spending more than 1k for a tv is still such a wild concept to me. I'll stick to my samsung Qled I got 3 years ago for now until prices aren't insane for oleds
You discussed the burn in from static images that is less of a problem now, but have they made any improvement on the red OLED pixels fading quicker than the others which led to LG panels giving yellows and skin tones a green look, particularly in the center of the screen?
4:30 'incredibly high response times' - it should be low :)
QLED!!!!!! Fans click here. Show the support n love.
OLED Is better blacks and thinner TV. QLED brighter and generally cheaper. But quality tends to be very similar even though OLED is considered better. Did I get that correct
Thank you so much for the clear explanation, Jon. I am shopping for a new/newer TV to replace my 15 YO Panasonic plasma and your video is very "basic" for me to understand, but very informative!
RIP Panasonic plasmas!
Last year I purchased a Samsung 95b I also have an lg from 2017. For me the LG now over six years old is the better picture and that’s with all the marketing bullshit with peak brightness.
Hard pass on burn in. Not worth it to have to worry about it.
Fair enough.
I've been trying out my first OLED TV for the past year and a half.
Daily use, mostly for video games. Lots of static HUD elements. Lots of movies, and even using it as a PC monitor now too.
So far, zero issues. Just an amazing image quality that I don't think I'll ever leave again.
Modern OLEDs are pretty great at countering burn in. They dim static pixels like logos, subtitles, and game huds. The whole image slowly rotates by a small amount to further prevent static pixels for too long, the run pixel cleaning every 4 hours of use to make sure all pixels are degrading equally.
It's pretty hard to get burn in. I've put over a hundred hours into some games with static bright HUDS and there's no issue at all.
Of course you can still get burn in if you abuse it hard, but it's not something to worry about unless you have a specific use case of leaving the same image on for a very long time.
This is not a concern on LG OLEDs and hasn't been for years. The issue is theoretical and not applicable to any normal use. Rtings has the data to back it up, since they've actually tested under controlled conditions by looping the same video 24/7 for years on end. Look at their data, if you want an evidence based approach.
From anecdotal experience, my LG C9 (which is about 5 years behind current models) has over 8000 hours of use and absolutely no hint of burn in. My two newer LG OLEDs also have no hint of burn in.
The same cannot be said for Samsung's QD-OLEDs. Samsung has to get their crap together and I wouldn't recommend one of their sets over an LG W-OLED, for that reason.
@@ultramegax would you recommend Samsung or LG for gaming? i was thinking of getting the C2 i can't see much of a difference picture wise compared to the C3
@@user-wh8mb7tm2gI want to buy the c2 for my ps5 but I’m worried about burn in
@@ultramegax i wouldnt say its not a worry for lg oled. rtings test showed all oleds had burn in after 4 months right up to the g3 model. yes this is not normal use but they said it works out to around 18 months of a normal persons use? my g3 was £3100 and i would like and expect to get a lot longer than 18 months before seeing burn in on the screen. i have a plasma in my bedroom that i have had since 2008 and only started to notice lines where black bars have been when the screen is black, i think its more than temp image retention but at 16 years old i cant complain lol hope my g3 lasts this long?
My phone is oled display thanks for showing us the difference between the two
Thank you for this. Here's the problem tho. When you talk about OLED I'm like that's what I want. Then you talk about QLED and I'm like that's what I want haha. I'm a Samsung guy so I probably just get the best model of QLED.
All newer tvs are 2500 to 2900 in price which is quite expensive
Im in the market for a 43 inch , with the Oled models in smaller sizes still using older panel tech do you recommend mini LEDs TVs specifically for gaming on a PS5 pro and PC?
It's completely understandable. The cost behind the OLED screen is almost impossible to get a half decent TV . QLED are trying to give ordinary people as close to OLED for a reasonable price. Well done guys!
Whaaat? I’ve never bought OLED because i didn’t the burn, yet my Samsung QN95b mini-led is pretty good, and Hisense u8n is looking pretty darn good!
Really nice comparison video - thank you!
As someone who has a C3 Oled, I bought a Q7 Qled for my living room and the picture quality compared to my oled was absolutely disgraceful. It basically looked just like a regular 4k LED tv. I returned the Qled the very next day. Oled picture quality is light years ahead of Qled and it’s not even close. Very difficult to go back once you get an Oled
QLED budget Tv . That's I love to Buy.
QLED all the way baby
If anyone is looking to game on a OLED. I've had the LG C2 Series 4K Smart OLED evo TV for about 2 years and it is hands down the best PC gaming experience I've ever had in my life. I have a liquid cooled 4080 and I push it to the limit gaming at 4K 120hz. The TV is also
have you noticed any burn ins at all? thinking about getting the C4
@curlysierf not at all. Just make sure you set a screen saver in the TV settings and auto off and you'll have nothing to worry about :)
by the way regarding QD oled having more image retention: I believe the first test of RTings was flawed because the QD oleds in their test at the time did not run the compensation cycles as often as the LG TV's, when they ran proper compensation cycles it cleared up.
i think all the oleds have burn in with their tests?
even after they found out the issue with the samsung there was still an image on the screen, it wasnt as bright after it ran the cycle but it was still there.
i seen the lg g3 has burn in after 4 months aswell. think they are all suffering burn in around that time?
i know people wont have news on their tv for as long as the test but this proves oled isnt really fit to be used as a tv.
lg claim you shouldnt watch a movie with black bars? how can anyone avoid this when almost all movies have black bars?
lg say dont watch anything with static icons on screen? again almost all stations have something on screen now.
iv owned an lg g3 since last july, so far no problems but its always a worry
@@bawbag3715 Evita las barras negras, ampliando el zoom. En el logotipo cambie el bajo por alto, eso recomienda el manual. Acabo de conseguir el LG C4 y uno disfruta mucho la imagen, pero es cierto que uno se preocupa.
@@tigresa821 hi, thanks for the reply. the problem with zooming in to remover the black bars is that you either stretch the picture up and down which gives you an out of shape picture or you fully zoom the picture all 4 ways but then you lose a lot of the screen on all 4 edges. i do use the zoom when watching football to avoid having the score icons on screen, but we shouldnt really need to be doing things like this to enjoy our tvs
yes this seems to be correct, theres a video showing burn in on a samsung oled, but after rtings figured out and the cycle it helped to fade the burn in, it was still there but not as easy to see
Should I buy 65 inch LG Qned 86 or 55 inch Samsung Oled?
Hello,
It mostly depends on your viewing distance. 2,3m = 55 inch and 2,75 = 65 inch. However, I had both QNED tv and now I have OLED tv. I returned the QNED because it was horrible screen quality. Please go with the 55 inch OLED or save some more and get 65 inch oled!! U wont regret it
@@martijn439 How bad is the brightness on an OLED really? It's still brighter than my 2013 32" Samsung LED for $400 right? Or do you really have to close the curtains every time you watch tv on an OLED?
i have a mi 65inch qled that i got for like 700$. 6 years and going good.
Yeah.. don't buy an OLED.
I have a permanent burn in on the middle of my screen that says "YOU DIED" Then i realized it was just a skill issue.
Could be subliminal messaging gone wrong 🤷♂️
Most manufactures give 5 years warranty, I personally get my moneys worth before the 5 years
I have both types. OLED is better unless you live in a glass house.
The clock goes to 45:00 , then halts, then resets a good bit?
Wtf?!
I have old lg c1 oled in my bedroom. I have a s95b in my living room and movie room/Xtra bedroom 😅 but the qleds outperform the oled big time imo. The oled just doesn't get bright enough for me
El LG C4 si tiene mucho brillo, seguro han ido mejorando el brillo.
LG C1 is a Dinosaur compared to the S95D
What about the difference between QLED and crystal?
and here I am just having a basic 2 yr 4 yr old 40 inch 1080p Led non smart TV that I only made smart by putting a TV stick on it.
What's stopping you from buying modern 2024 TV . At least QLED. I just bought Hisense 55inch for my garage for $280....
You mean a 24 year old or a 2-4 year old tv? 🤔
I felt better off with a dumb tv.
I own sony 28 been like 15 years.
1080p, still works like charm.
Sony has high quality components
This is the most clear explanation video out there on this topic, thanks!
Both to me look good, there is a lot of things I don’t care about in OLED. viewing angles is a non issue as I only watch tv straight on.
Pero que tenga excelentes ángulos de visión es un plus, cuando te mueves un poco, la imagen no se degrada y eso es muy agradable.
The only real topic worth mentioning over the past decade is 100 inch TVs are under $2k... Size beats most TV gimmicks especially at that price
Yeah, and an OLED 100 incher costs as much as a new KIa. Not much of a tough choice in that size range, that's for sure.
@cbotten106 the TCL 89 115" is the price of a Kia too and every reviewer got to review it...
My 85u8n mini qled looks almost the same as my OLED83G4 at a fraction of the cost
LG 32" 1080p bought in 2010 (yes back then there were 1080p TVs in 32" size) used it till 2022 when the TV finally just died. And here people are discussing Qled and Oled😮
I'll take the infinite contrast any day any time.
Oled 100%. I watch movies primary and I was watching them side by side and the image of water was terrible on the Qled. I was like someone had spilled a chemical in the water, with that iridescence look to it. Once you experience, you can't unsee it.
I actually went back to a QLED from an OLED sounds crazy but my OLED failed after only 2 years dead pixels everywhere and the brightness dropped off the face of the earth. I loved the blacks but the QLED set I have dose a pretty good job at showing almost perfect blacks. If the OLED was perfect for black the QLED I have is like 90% black almost perfect and for me that’s okay enough. The extra brightness and colour I get now over my OLED is so much better and HDR so much brighter. I’ll be keeping an eye on the dead pixels thing if I get any but I just want a set that will last longer then 2 years. Hopefully I got one now. Plus the QLED was so much cheaper then the OLED.
I had a lg oled 55" tv fantastic picture quality however ended up with horrendous screen burn / image retention !! so i would never buy an oled tv again !! Ive just purchased a Hisense 65" E7KQTUK PRO QLED tv which is brilliant for next gen gaming VRR / ALLM /FREESYNC PREMIUM 120 / 144 HZ low response time GAMING BAR and DOLBY ATMOS with a subwoofer built into rear of tv BUT MOST OF ALL NO RISK OF SCREEN BURN / IMAGE RETENTION !! i didnt expect the picture quality to be any where near as good as the oled tv but my goodness ive been blown away by the picture quality it is awesome and all this for just £649 !! a £1000 cheaper than an oled its so close to an oled picture that its just not worth paying loads more money for an oled tv im so pleased and can game away without the worry of screen burn !!
John, I came here to find out about TVs, but I want to find out about something very different from you. After watching this video, I'm dying to know what you are using for a camera, what you are using for editing software, and what you are using for your audio. Because I felt the quality of this video that you output was one of the best things I've seen on UA-cam. And I'm so interested to have those answers because I need to start making videos for my company, and I'd love some guidance from you. Could you share that information with me, privately, if you don't want to have it be on this channel?
oled just have drawbacks that are too significant... like image retention and short lifespan... maybe "tandem oled" will help with this... but not the price...a good IPS with QD and a high number of dimming zones is really the only option for me... at least until micro-led or QDEL becomes a thing
Those were problems 10 years ago, not right now.
@@densmac nah.. they're still problems.. you can be in denial about it as much as you want though
We have a 12 year old Panasonic plasma that is so sharp and clear compared to our 2021 Samsung UA8000 LED/LCD. There is no comparison! Will the Sony Bravia 9 mini-led wow us like our plasma?
my humble opinion: your plasma TV looks "sharp and clear" because it has less "pixels" and they have less color range. Your 2021 UA8000 has more resolution but it is a budget panel, therefore you suffer from low contrast and color accuracy. A NEO QLED should give you a much better image quality when compared with your old plasma. Remember that by having more resolution, it will show you much more detail, and sometimes you'll think it's a "blurred" image but in fact it is showing a better image, more tones, less sharpening, which translates in a more realistic result.
Save money, get a big screen budget LCD, or go to OLED for the perfect blacks and response times.
Came to the comments for the voice crack.😅 Great video as always
The real winner is consumers having good options for both. Want the most mind blowing picture quality and contrast? OLED has you. Want super high brightness and no fear of burn-in because you use it as your monitor? Mini LED has you
Ive owned a 32" CHG70 Gaming Monitor QLED 144 Hz (LC32HG70QQNXZA) for over 4 yrs now and its been awesome for all my gaming and content consumption needs :) Price was decent to about $700 on sale back then at costco. QLEDs are more than reasonable price wise but OLEDs while nice are still pretty expensive. OLEDs should get cheaper so eventually I might try getting one of those but the screen burn-in is still concerning xD
A super high end OLED ONLY. You get the brightness of QLED and rich colors without the oversaturation of cartoonist colors of QLED. OLED is KING!!!
I just ordered the LG G3. I’m so excited to watch some 4K Blu-ray’s on this & experience the “pop” with those HDR highlights.
@@balladofthebroken7569 You're going to love the G3!
Nothing beats OLED.
Nothing beats Oled but burn in does
Micro led does but it’s like 10k
Burn in : 🥱🥱🥱🥱
The only downsides of OLED:
- brightness lacks compared to miniLED backlit panels
- black crush can be an issue because of the above
- burn-in is inevitable
WHen it comes to:
TV = i always buy SAMSUNG
PHONE: I always buy IPHONE
Computer monitor screen: I always buy DELL or LG
VACUUM cleaner: I always buy DYSON
Laptop: I Always buy DELL or LENOVO
HIFI SPEAKRES: I buy SONOS
MACHINE TOOLS: I only buy DEWALT
Great video, very easy to understand, kept my attention and now I actually know the difference 😅
Cheers!
oleds sometimes have a green tint at an angle..
As an LG user for 6 years i never face any issues on my TV.
How is the burn ins condition handled in these new oleds? Do they still get them?
They are organic material, what do you expect?
You did not talk about mini-led and full array local dimming very very important features.
There is no better picture quality than an QD OLED tv at the moment and that comes with it's downside which is the price tag, but in the same time it pays off fir what you give. There's no going back agter you lay eyes on a tv like that. It's one way street.
OLED is nice, but the burn ins are a pain.
I currently have a samsung qe55s95batxxu - and I’m thinking of going for the qn800d just worried because I would be going from OLED to QLED Would this be a decent upgrade or would I be disappointed?
Idk I just love LG panels
Anytime
You got it confused, NEO QLED is MINI-LED
ULED IS MINI LED
AND QNED IS MINI LED
Both Hisense and Samsung have their QLED TVs named as QLED
Don’t confuse it people, MINI-LED TVs do have QUANTUM DOT TECHNOLOGY
What is the best way to get the most out of my qled? I've got one but ive only got satellite dish with no 4k programming
I keep CNBC on all day while working. I’d have OLED burn in by the end of a week.😂
The pixle cleaning feature on newer OLED displays almost entirely mitigates burn in even after 6 months of running a news channel non stop.
I’ve read that but I’m skeptical. I work from home and my TV is on all day on a channel with a ticker and logo. I probably hit that avg 6 month user usage in a week.
@@Stopher2475 that's 6 months of the TV being on without changing the news channel once.
If you cant tell the difference in quality you probably dont need an oled. If your still rocking plasma and need to upgrade you probably want an oled.
I’ve currently got two QLEDs Samsung Q80T & QN90B and one OLED LG G2. All three have been great sets and I’m extremely happy with them. This year I might replace my G2 with the 85” Samsung QN900D or whatever the replacement Sony is for last year’s X95L or possibly the 83” G4 and move my G2 into my bedroom.
I have Q80T 55" and QN 90B 65" both are masterpiece for sport games NBA FIFA... now i deciding on LG G2 55 and S90C..
I recently bought a C3 and i prefer much more the brighness and the image sharpness of my Q95T 2020 model , which it doesn't even have mini LED technology. Q95T was the last model that it was using regular LED.