It is very much a case of what you want to use it for. Both the A350 and 787 are brilliant up-to-date aircraft, and the fact that some airlines operate both should tell all but the most blinkered fanboy that neither is best at everything. Real world v carefully selected and presented statistics! As for the less up-to-date A330neo (although the wings are supposed to be rather impressive), it appears to perform closer to the rivals than its origins give it any right to. However, there is one area where it excels - shorter, high density routes, where its ability (by design) to cope with those much higher flight cycles makes it the better choice. Routes where the inferior cabin environment has less time to have an effect on the human body.
Well it depends, if you want to discover the future of flying, go with the A350, however if you would like to remember your childhood nostalgia, being a 90's kid, the A330neo is your buddy.
It's harder to land an 330 than A359 because A330 height is less and the flight control is more delayed,the first flare height will be as early as 50 feet above ground. it's different from the A350 which flare height is only about 30 feet.if we use the same height as A350 with the A330, it could lead to a hard landing. But i would go For an A350-941
if all planes had landing gear like the a330 then they would all be butter machines
Yep, A330s and A340s are butter machines! Thanks for watching
It is very much a case of what you want to use it for.
Both the A350 and 787 are brilliant up-to-date aircraft, and the fact that some airlines operate both should tell all but the most blinkered fanboy that neither is best at everything. Real world v carefully selected and presented statistics!
As for the less up-to-date A330neo (although the wings are supposed to be rather impressive), it appears to perform closer to the rivals than its origins give it any right to.
However, there is one area where it excels - shorter, high density routes, where its ability (by design) to cope with those much higher flight cycles makes it the better choice.
Routes where the inferior cabin environment has less time to have an effect on the human body.
Absolutely and since a large majority of widebody flights are not long haul, the A330neo does have a marketplace
Both are able to configure on high density seating
A339neo: 9 abreast
A350; 10 abreast
True, though the A330 is a narrower seat at 9 than A350 is at 10. Thanks for watching
Indian airlines need to get 330 neos ASAP. We need lots of capacity. Wide body is the way to go.
A330neo or A350, which is better? Comment below!
I like the a330 better
Well it depends, if you want to discover the future of flying, go with the A350, however if you would like to remember your childhood nostalgia, being a 90's kid, the A330neo is your buddy.
It's harder to land an 330 than A359 because A330 height is less and the flight control is more delayed,the first flare height will be as early as 50 feet above ground. it's different from the A350 which flare height is only about 30 feet.if we use the same height as A350 with the A330, it could lead to a hard landing. But i would go For an A350-941
Finally I found another Sg that likes planes
Haha, there are plenty :)
@@oneskyflyerur one of the best
no premier?
Lol I forgot that this video was going out