0:02 Hello guys! When it comes to the volume of selling, Airbus has already outrun Boeing. But I just wanted to give some kind of Symbolic meaning of a manufacturer who had been a champion for a long time. Also.. Regarding introducing airplanes ever produced from both companies, I purposely left out some of them since it's too many and I thought that it could be better to say it as a family if possible, like A320 family or A300 family.. Lots of you have left the comments saying I missed A310 😅 That's the reason why!! One more thing.. Sidestick of Airbus was introduced in 1987 by A320, not in 1994 by A330.. my bad! Idea that I wanted to give you was not letting you know the exact time but like.. "it's been long ago.. concept" anyway.. I should have been more careful! Thank you for watching and comments 😊👍
Sidestick of Airbus was introduced in 1987 by A320, and it crashed during test demonstrations on first flight with passengers due to error on fly-by-wire.
@@captainjksaviationlife248 What you said about Boieng's approach to "putting computers on planes" made me curious about your thoughts about all the trouble with the 737-800 MAX, and what was (how I've understood it) issues with something that was supposed to help keep the plane level, but ended up making the plane nosedive. Now I'm not sure if you can talk about specifics like that, but is a result of Boeing trying (and I guess failing) to change their approach? Edit* After writing this comment I saw that you had a dedicated video on this subject.
Not just outer,or indepth, even their fcoms, fppm, completely different, Boeing manuals are very graphical, airlines tailored them to tables, different colors for diff scenarios,Blue for Wet/TO， Airbus manuals explained more,better organized, more details in Flt Planning, u will not find CLB/DSC info on Boeing, nor ISA∆>>so, it takes a very hands-on n focus guys to fly Boeing, even downright to Dispatch n AME,..we used to use our I.Ds as rulers to plot RTOW years back, today it's on iPad...Flysmart, OPT, Foreflight, just don't Fly stupid. Ha..safe skies everyone!
@@conned ID as a ruler 😄😁 FlySmart was so impresive when I first faced it! and.. I remember that was quite long time ago when Boeing had nothing like that
To cooperate is obviously a better way to develop a make progress than competition. Scientists in universities around the world share information with each other for that reason. Competition is to make money for your self or your corporation.
Fascinating to hear a captain pilot's perspective, thank you! As a frequent international passenger in the past on many brands of planes I had no problem with boarding a Boeing 737 jurassic or classic, 747 or 777 nor a noisy and vibrating DC 9 ascending steeply into the clouds. These days I would flatly refuse to board any Boeing aircraft, especially the 737Max series. I'd make sure my airline bookings result in Airbus travel of any kind with the A380 as the preferred option, most stable and quiet even in economy class!
Hello ~ 😊 Thank you so much for your comment!! Boeing.. it's so sad.. I just hope that they could change quite a bit.. so people would turn their eyes to them.
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Yes it is sad indeed, after the merger of Boeing with McDouglas things went only according to profit, ingnoring even their own engineers warnings, so typically USA! For your own personal saftey and your passengers, please apply your inborn wisdom and refuse to pilot any Boeing Aircraft if you can. Soon you might be in a position to fly C919 and Airbus only! I as a technically inclined often marvel at the required knowledge, calm of mind, concentration and skill needed to fly a modern airliner whilst I am struggling to drive a modern vehicle safely on the road. My highest respect and best wishes. 👍
Boeing has safety issues with other types, including 787 and 737-NG. About that second one, there was issued with rudder (missing bolts and faulty hydraulic valve) long time ago and couple crashes related to it. Its very likely, that other types has hidden issues as well.
@@norbert.kiszka One more reason never to board a Boeing airliner as a passenger again if you can avoid it. My recent Qatar flight on a 787 from Doha to Vienna ended in a scary hard and swaying landing, not sure if an Airbus would have performed better in those gusty conditions. I had little concern boarding a Swiss 777 seated like a tin of sardines on my way back to Australia via Hong Kong. The Qantas A330 to Sydney and the Qatar A380 to Doha I found a relive! 😊
Airbus has fixed the flaw of not communicating with the other pilot. Even with AF447 before this change was made, the side stick actually vibrates heavily to let you know that the other pilot is also trying to control the aircraft
"the side stick actually vibrates heavily to let you know that the other pilot is also trying to control the aircraft" On the A320 family the aircraft will say "DUAL INPUT." You can't miss it unless you are deaf.
Nice work! I'm a new hired at AAL. Very excited for the future & opportunity. I currently fly a Falcon 2000 made by the French.. I've to pick between the 737 & A320 in class, I'm definitely leaning towards the airbus. Some similarities with the Falcon 2000, clean & simple.
Good to have you here and thanks for comment! Though I'm currently flying 787, I also lean towards the airbus cause it's simple and easy like you said. Hope you keep up good work and good luck on your choice and your future! 😄
Nice video. Always good when a pilot talks about the differences between Boeing and Airbus after flying both. For those wondering what I said before I edited it, I asked which he preferred for handling, A330 or 787.
Hello hi~ Hmm.. it's not easy to give you the answer. But something calls to mind suddenly.. The wildest animal was B737, every time I was shooting an approach, it gave me real fun. But in terms of airline operations with passengers, and to meet a lot of company regulations, I feel more comfortable when I'm in Airbus. Thank you very much for comment, buddy!! 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Ah I see so no preference btwn the A330 and 787 in handling. The 737 requires more inputs anytime it's disturbed in flight since it's just a typical basic airliner as far as manual hand flying goes, without the automatic hand flying assistance that the A330 and 787 has, whereas both would fight against disturbances thanks to the use of roll rate, pitch rate and g-load. The Airbus cockpit I always hear is very comfortable, so much so that even Boeing's best attempt with pilot comfort, the 787, pales in comparison to the Airbus. Thanks for the reply :) I'm definitely sharing this video.
Very good video. You can give an expert opinion for sure. I am a retired Mechanic and would like to say I prefer the Airbus too. I like the way the Airbuses computer systems help the Mechanic troubleshooting faults. As a passenger, I feel more comfortable. When I worked Sheet Metal on Boeing aircraft, I found the materials a little beefier. On the Airbus, everything is precision made so replacement parts almost always aligned up with the pilot holes. I heard the old saying "If it's not Boeing, I'm not going" but I think that will be going away soon. Boeing has some catching up to do with Airbus. You are so right about the differences. Thank you.
Hello~ As opposed to your comment, the mechanics who I used to talk with in KAL prefer to be in Boeing planes. They said that Airbus ones brought up a lot of computer errors. But I personally lean a little towards Airbus 😊
Kudos for having been able to succinctly express the main differences in philosophy, with few examples, instead of details overload. Actually as a once frequent traveller I can cabinwise relate to that, maybe the differences were even more pronounced in these days. The old Boeing feeling (707, 727, 737, 747): Solid, conservative, trustworthy, no-frills, with a touch of wagon (727, 737) or clipper (707, 747). As opposed to Airbus (A 300, A310, A320): Cool, French, sophisticated, but somehow impersonal, even boring. BTW: DC-8, DC-9, DC-10 were all likable, yet somehow odd. And the L-1011 felt like an interesting standalone.
You were very fair and professional and cited fascinating sublties of differences The only airbus difference I don't like is the joystick. But now, I see the comfort of a n Airbus pilot tray table! Instead of a yoke.
The perspective of an experienced pilot that flew planes from both competing companies was very insightful! At the end, I was surprised by your personal preference for Airbus.
@@captainjksaviationlife248I’m new on Airbus products and have most of my time on Boeings. Airbus edges out for me as well. But in order to do so, as a pilot coming off Boeings, you have to drop the Boeing philosophy in order to fully embrace the Airbus. If you want to fly your Airbus, with “how Boeing does things” on your mind, you will never understand the Airbus.
With fly by wire a side stick is better. Because except for takeoff and landing the majority of time the autopilot is flying and a yoke takes up room. Similar to having a physical keyboard on a smart phone when majority of time one is consuming content not inputting it with keyboard.
I am a twice yearly passenger going from Manila to USA and back. Ride on economy claas of A350-900 and B777-300 and felt the comfort of Airbus vs Boeing thru their seating arrangement. Hope Boeing will improve the passengers comfort in their next and new production line of Boeing passenger planes.
I flew a lot on different routes around Asia. I like 777 and 747. I never fly and will never on Max's. I will also not fly anymore on 787. I like A350 and maybe one day, if lucky I could try a 380.@@captainjksaviationlife248
I used to fly with only one airline (I'm based in Asia), the flag carrier where I lived. It happened to be one of the most successful airlines in the world in terms of profit; professionalism of cabin crew AND safety record. Now, ever since Boeing's repeated fiascos, ranging from its B737 accidents to its management's inability to up the quality of their manufacturing ending in their CEO's resignation (yet again!), I've decided to pick my flights not based on airline but based on the make of the plane being flown for my sector - I will pick the airline that happens to fly an Airbus for the sector I fly. NO MORE BOEINGS FOR ME!
I fly an A320. I do agree it would be beneficial to know the other pilot’s side stick position, such as during the ground control check or on takeoff roll. Aside from this mild inconvenience, I absolutely love the aircraft. It is a pleasure to fly, and it is very comfortable. My company bought some 737 Max. Most of our pilots do not want to fly on them.
" it would be beneficial to know the other pilot’s side stick position, such as during the ground control check or on takeoff roll." If the other pilot is moving the stick you would hear "DUAL INPUT."
@@cosmicdebris2223 Other aircraft had teething issues. Inexcusable? Of course. But for instance the DC-10 went on to have a long and profitable career.
Sound quite even to me except for the Flightstick. I really really would want Force Feedback to get a feeling on stress that is put on the plane. And of course immediately sense that the other pilot also tries to control the plane and there is conflicting input.
I have been trained and flew all the McDonald-Douglas DC 8-series aircraft. My favorite was, and still is the DC 8-63. I also know Boeing & Airbus as a consultant.
안녕하세요 기장님😊 전 학창시절부터 소문난 항덕이라 늘 파일럿 입장에서의 보잉,에어버스의 차이에 대해 궁금했는데 이렇게 자세하게 설명해주셔서 정말 좋았습니다 왜 진작 기장님 블로그를 몰랐던건지 ㅠㅠ 이제라도 알았으니 다행이네요! 😁 진짜 시절이 좋아져서 제가 다 호강하네요 ㅎㅎ 영어도 영어권국가에서 11년째 살며 NZ에서 일한 저보다 유창하시니 역시 캡틴은 아무나 되는게 아니라는걸 느끼고 갑니다! (사실 첨엔 랜덤영상으로 뜨길래 밤에 눈감고 들었는데 발음이 좋으셔서 놀랐어요) 앞으로도 좋은 영상 기대하겠습니다💕
극찬으로 가득하네요 댓글이 😂 너무 감사합니다^^ 영어는 공부중입니다. 스크립트를 쓰면서 영상을 준비하지만.. 정말 서서히 느네요. 요즘은 원어민 친구 한명있는게 작은 바램입니다. 유튜브에 좋은 쌤들이 많지만 혼자 하다보면 한계가 금방 느껴져요 ㅎㅎ 암튼 감사드려요 😃😄
Really good video, thank you ! As a sidenote, Airbus named FADEC and not EEC as FADEC can interface with different type of engine that use different controls. CFM and CFM neo using ECU and IAE, PW and PW Neo using EEC. They have different interface with the system in the plane and different datas are collected, thus having an "umbrella" name to cover both types of system.
Hello, hi.. thank you so much for comment. It's been years since I left 330, my memory is a bit rusty about the relationship between those systems. And I appreciate you letting me know about neo ones as well. Hope you keep me in the loop so I can hold the bridge to Airbus 😄
No, on the A320 it's EEC. From the V2500 IAE literature; "The V2500 uses full authority digital engine control. The FADEC comprises; 1) Sensor Inputs. 2) Data Inputs. 3) The Electronic Engine Control Unit. (EEC) The heart of the FADEC is the Electronic Engine Control. (EEC)
@rael5469 and the CFM56-A specification tells you "The FADEC system consists of : -an Engine Control Unit (ECU) containing two identical computers, designated channel A and channel B. The ECU electronically performs engine control calculations and monitors the engine's condition. -a Hydro-Mechanical Unit (HMU), which converts electrical signals from the ECU into hydraulic pressures to drive the engine's valves and actuators. -peripheral components such as valves, actuators and sensors used for control and monitoring." The A320 CEO version comes with 3 engine options, CFM56-A (ECU), PW6000 (EEC) and only for the A318 the IAE V2500 (EEC) For the NEO variant only 2 engines option exist, the LEAP-1A (ECU) and the PW1000G (EEC) So the CFM FADEC uses the ECU technology and the PW/IAE the EEC technology
@@martinchab1 "So the CFM FADEC uses the ECU technology and the PW/IAE the EEC technology" Right.....why are you telling me this? All I was saying is that on most A320 it's EEC. The FADEC is the whole system. The engine control is the EEC, not FADEC. For instance, I would never get a task to "replace the FADEC." It would be to replace the EEC. Even in your example it is the ECU and not the FADEC.
As an European I keep my fingers crossed for both Airbus and Boeing. However the quality issues concerning Boeing models seem to be bothering. Hope it will be overcome soon.
I'm also for Airbus. As a passenger, I prefer the cabin door next to me to open only when an embarkation finger or ladder is firmly adhering to the exterior surface of the fuselage. But that's only my personal taste, I'll give you that. 😅
Im retired Captain (United, Western and Aerolineas Argentinas), i´m flew with MD10, DC-10 and B747, Boeing 727 and Douglas DC9, almost all time with B747 and DC10 and i prefer Boeing.... definitvely and positive! Best regards Capt.
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you so much Captain, i wish all the best in your career and absolutely much success for you. I miss so much the yoke and friendly chats with partners, long time flying, my Queen of Skies and much things more, but that´s it, time is over. Best regards captain. Hugs.
Thanks for that enlightening briefing Cap....now, when booking my flights, I would check first if I am flying in an "A" aircraft or broomstick 🤭. Hope to fly in one of your flights Cap......Bon voyage🛫
The purpose of this video was to let people know the difference between two from a pilot's point of view.. so I had never researched the data like how many planes they sell.. You're right! Now I know sales volume of Airbus has been more than Boeing for the last 5years..
As for the difference in toggle switches ON/OFF positions it could be due to the fact that in Europe (buildings/homes in general) UP is ON and DOWN is OFF, whereas, if I am not mistaken it's the opposite in the US.
Those confusing (or just different) switches are on the ceiling which is an inclined ramp above one’s head. I’ve always thought in terms of “moving forward” (down) or back (off), what results in the Up=Off impression (retired Boeing pilot, no experience with Airbus).
Well, Captain JK, I think you gave just about as diplomatic an answer as you could choosing between Boeing and Airbus. As a passenger, I would lean towards Airbus being the better choice as well, but always lurking in the background is the AF 447 incident, and the MCAS issues that gave flyers pause. I'll have to go and check out your other videos, now. Thank you!
Hello, hi~ Thanks for comment.. but I guess you haven't go through to the end ☺ I recommend you to watch it again, at very end of it, you'll find me standing in the same side as you 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Yes, I did watch it all the way to the end, where you cast your vote 6-4 leaning towards Airbus, and that's why I said that I leaned towards Airbus as well (as a passenger, since I'm not a pilot), but I guess my point was that both manufacturers have had issues that have caused planes to crash so that's probably the perspective that I view things from. If I a pilot, though, I think I would rather fly a Boeing with a column than an Airbus with a joystick. I think every commercial pilot should have manual control to fly a plane (like a Cessna, as you say), rather than trust a computer/AI to make decisions for the pilot. The last thing I want as a passenger is to have a pilot in the cockpit who doesn't have the means to fly a plane at a very basic level.
@@nplus1watches35 Your comment means a lot to me, thanks. As a pilot, why I lean a bit towards Airbus is not because they can cover me in the case that I make mistakes but because it's way more stable while flying manually. As I showed you in the video, it's not easy to see what the other pilot's doing with the side stick in the Airbus. But digging into AF447, even the brand new F/O made critical mistake, the other F/O could have overriden the control. (There's a red OVERRIDE button, when it's pushed.. the other pilot cannot control the plane) I "guess" both pilots at the moment were not able to recognize what was exactly happening, and the captain came back to the cockpit way too late. As nothing is perfect, everything has its own flaws. So do Boeing and Airbus... I don't know which one is safer from a passenger's point of view but as you said.. All the pilots are to be able to control the plane under whatever conditions... Thanks again for good comment and We'll try!!
Just wanted to add that the AF447 incident happened because the computers totally left the flying to the crew. It wasn’t automation, it was the lack of it. And MCAS is not automation. It’s a sad Boeing example of implementing shortcuts. Can you believe the Max aircraft is newer than the 787? It’s like both were made by different manufactures. Consider MCAS wasn’t needed for the Max to be a good aircraft. MCAS was needed to mimic previous gen and avoid the need for new type rating for 737 pilots. …and finally because MCAS was implemented without redundancy, using only one computer and one AoA sensor without clearly explaining its function to the crews.
@@miks564AF447 was so messed after the pitot tubes froze. From these everything was a mess. Computers did their job as they should but the pilots didn’t hear the stall warning due to stress. At last computer gave up.
I think there is a signal or some device to indicate which joystick is in use or maybe it came after 447. I also read that when the two joystick are use simultaneously they are disengage??
@@ross9581 If both pilots try to use their "Side Stick" at the same time a synthetic voice announces "DUAL INPUT !" Plus either pilot can take control of the side stick by holding the autopilot disconnect button in which case the aircraft will announce "PRIORITY LEFT" OR "PRIORITY RIGHT."
@@ross9581 " I also read that when the two joystick are use simultaneously they are disengage??" Actually, if both pilots use their side stick the fly by wire system will calculate the combined input. It will sum the two inputs or subtract if they go in opposite directions. I think that way an instructor can safely add inputs to a student's inputs. But yeah, both side sticks will work at the same time unless one pilot uses the "side stick priority" function. We test the side stick priority function from time to time. It is a scheduled maintenance task.
Good evening Captain, how you doing? personal question.. In a very gusty and windy condition, you think airbus Normal Law mode makes the landing more difficult than make a conventional plane land?? Thanks a lot.
Hello~!! 😉 As I said in the video, 'Fly-by-wire' system uses electric signal to take pilot's input from a sidestick and then flight computers send the signal to the hydraulic motors of control surface to react accordingly. It seems like lightning fast, isn't it? Yes, it is.. But.. Compared to conventional 'Fly-by-cable' planes, it has a little tiny lag before the flight surfaces actually move. Some pilots complain about it and say that it is a bit difficult to fly in windy wx. But as far as controllability concern, I personally have felt almost no difference between two systems. But if the weather gets really rough, not because of Airbus system, but because of the wide wing span of A330, which I used to fly.. it was a bit hard to control the airplane on short final.
thanks a lot for your time and explanation Captain, I really appreciated that.. Can I ask you last question that I can't find answer because of conflicting sources? During FLARE MODE is there direct proportionality between side stick deflection and control surface deflection?? Or is always a roll rate and g factor demand but with less limitation? thanks..@@captainjksaviationlife248
I used to speak a bit of German when I was in high school.. But it was.. too long ago 😄 Wow.. thank you so much for saying that!! Vielen Dank für Ihren Besuch! 😊👍🏻
Awesome video Captain JK. I appreciate you dumbing it down for the layman like myself. I recently became interested in the Air France disaster in 2009 (the A380 that crashed after leaving Rio de Janeiro). I have watched several videos only including the documentary about the investigation. However, I still don't understand how something like that can actually occur. Can you make a video explaining this tragedy?
Hi~!! Welcome to my channel.. and thank you for watching and your comment. The accident happened in 2009.. it was A330-200. Sometime soon, I'll try to make a video telling why that was supposed to happen 😊
처음에 말한 최첨단자율주행전기차를 선택하느냐 전통적인스포츠카를 선택하느냐의 취향차이인듯 합니다. 그냥 자동차를 이동수단으로만 보고 편안하게 갈려면 자율주행차를 달리면서 느낄수 있는 스릴과 손맛을 느낄려면 스포츠카를 선택하듯이 그냥 편안하게 장시간 가고싶어 하시는 조종사분들은 에어버스를 선호하고 직접 거대한 비행기를 몰면서 짜릿한 이착륙의 손맛을 느껴보고자 하는 조종사분들은 보잉을 선택하지 않을까 싶네요. 그러나, 여객기는 어디까지나 대중교통이고 조종사분들은 직업으로 하시는 분들이시기에 조종 편의를 더 많이 제공하는 에어버스를 많이 선호하실듯 합니다. 여객기는 스포츠카처럼 개인취향으로 타는 자가용이 아니니까요.
Thank you, Captain, for explaining the differences between the 2 leading aeroplane manufacturers. I have a student pilot licence and your point on the joystick vs. the yolk catches my attention. With the yolk aelerone control, both the port and stern yolks respond simultaneously as the pilot inputs their controls and you can visibly see it. On the other hand, with the joystick controls, it seems that there is no way of telling who is taking control of the aircraft without a loud and clear communications. That leaves a grey area of concern as the risks of conflicting control command inputs into the aircraft exist, and is an area where Airbus needs to work on, as there is no way of telling which pilot is having control inputs, which can be disastrous, as you pointed out.
Hello.. You're on a training stage to go to airlines.. Keep up hard work! yes.. Airbus's sidestick system is super comfy and stable.. I personally think that the point we're talking about should be clearly solved
Nice to see from a pilots perspective. I would think having less options on things like flaps would cut down on potential errors with the setting. We have witnessed a lot of pilot mistakes resulting from confusion with the controls, so I think taking a lot of the guesswork out of it would be a benefit. I guess it depends what you’re used to.
being right handed I also prefer to use a joystick in my right hand. I'd be uncomfortable sitting on the left in an airbus being forced to use my left hand to control the joystick especially given the responsibility. However, I still much prefer Airbus overall as a passenger and refuse to fly on 737 MAX aircraft. The thrown together compromise with software dealing with extreme design changes of the engine locations I find irresponsible (as we saw with the two fatal crashes before the "workaround" modifications and re-certification).
Hello!! Every pilot struggles to get used to the left seat during thier captain training and so did I.. 😊 I believed that lots of people dispointed at Boeing's behavior regarding 737-MAX I hope they would show us complete overhaul this time
Good run down of differences. I suspect that most pilots, by far, will always want to fly the one that Pays the Best! ;-) I mean .... am I wrong. Thanks for the post.
잘 봤습니다 선배님^^ 다른 영상에서 911이전부터 파일럿이셨다고 해서 아버지세대 영어발음 하실거라고 생각했는데... 대단하십니다 ㅎㅎ 동네에서 비행할때 ㅇㅇ approach(사는 곳 공개될까봐 가렸습니다) 주파수 들으면 원어민 아니라면 대형기 모는데도 정말 저걸 영어라고 하는건가... 싶은 기장들도 많던데요... 유튜브 하시는 계기도 그렇고 이미 기장이신데도 더 발전을 위해 노력하시는 것이 존경스럽습니다. 영상 고맙습니다.
좋게 봐 주시는 거 같아요 ㅎㅎ 영어는 옛날부터 새해가 되면 늘 결심해오던 그런 거였는데.. 작년이 되서야 다시 공부해보자 하고 시작했습니다. 요즘은 비행도 많고, 편집하느라 ㅎㅎ 공부를 거의.. 그래도 아직 꿈은 "원어민 처럼" 입니다. 죽기 전에 꿈을 이룰지는 모르지만요^^ 암튼 너무 감사합니다~
The only difference that matters to me as a passanger: Only one of them DELIBERATELY produce faulty models that simply fall apart in the air just out of pure greed.
And I believe it was on 2022 or 2023 that we've seen an incident with dual input on an Air France 777 during final approach. The yokes are of course inter connected and the pilots were fighting each other without realizing it. Lack of feedback on the sidestick is not ideal, but the new ones they're going to use do not solve the dual input issue. Only clear and proper communication does.
지나가다 우연히 보게되었습니다. 아시아나 14년차 747카고fo 후배 인사드립니다! 저는 320=>772=>747 조종하고 있지만 보잉의 매력에 빠지게 된게 미국에서 747교육받을때 교관님이 하셨던 말때문이었습니다. "에어버스는 컴퓨터를 믿지만, 보잉은 조종사를 믿는다." 저 말 하나로 힘들지만 자부심을 가지고 비행을 하고있으며, 사이드스틱으로 조종을하다가 요크로 처음 조종했을때 동체의 묵직함및 거동이 느껴져서 깜짝놀랐던 기억이 있습니다ㅎㅎ 영상 재밋게 잘 보았고, 자주 놀러오겠습니다~ 즐비안비하십시오/^^
안녕하세요 반갑습니다 후배님 ㅎㅎ 이렇게 얘기해도 되나요 😊 맞습니다 두 군데 철학이 확실이 다른 거 같아요. 보잉이 때로는 너무 심하게 보수적인거 아닌가 라는 생각도 들지만, 말씀하신대로 나름의 고집과 철학이 주는 묵직함이 매력인 거 같습니다. 늘 안전 비행하시고.. 경력을 보니 업그레이드 하실 때가 다가오는 듯 한데.. 좋은 결과 있으시길 바라고, 가끔 댓글로 소통하시죠 반가웠습니다!!~
@@captainjksaviationlife248 - yeah I would imagine so. The side stick just feels wrong. But you probably just adapt as a pilot. I’m just a Microsoft Flight Sim enthusiast. So my opinion doesn’t hold much weight. 🤙
반갑습니다 기장님^^ 스위치가 옵션이었군요. 제가 330을 탔던 국내 k사와 중국항공사는 모두 보잉과 반대였어요. 절차적으로도 움직이는 상태에서 세울때는 페달브레이크를 밟아 세우고 파킹브레이크를 돌렸지만, 서있는 상태에서 파킹브레이크는 그냥 돌려도 되는 절차에 제한은 없었어요. 이렇게 항공사마다 같은 기종이라도 다른 점이 꽤 많다는 것도 조종사인 저도 신기하네요^^ 댓글 감사드리고, 가끔 이야기 들려주시면 감사하겠습니다 😄
The biggest difference has to be the yoke vs. side stick. Yoke is placed on the center line of the pilot's body which is ideal for hand eye coordination while the side stick can force captains to use the left hand which for 7 out 8 people is the off hand and therefore less coordinated hand.
Actually all Captains sitting in the left seat regardless (yoke or side stick) will fly with the left hand on the yoke and right hand on the thrust levers. As a pilot I have spent 12 years in the right seat with yokes, 12 years in the left seat with yokes and the last 4 years in the left seat with a side stick. After 16 years flying around with my left hand as a right handed person, I prefer left seat with a side stick. You get used flying from both seats very early in your career.
I wonder about the relative safety records of the two manufacturers. Not sure what the metric is, crashes per year normalized to the # of planes of each type?
기장님 한국은 왜 조종실내 계기판 영상 촬영이 안되는걸까요? 뭐 중요한 보안 사항이 있어서 그런걸까요? 그리고 또 궁금한건 항공사에서 근무하다가 기종변경은 조종사의지와는 상관없이 회사에서 일방적으로 통보하고 이루어지나요? 손에익은 기종조종하다가 다른기종으로 바뀌면 훈련하는데만 6개월걸리고 다시 매뉴얼 공부하고 시물레이션 훈련받고 스트레스 받을것 같습니다
그러게요 ㅠㅠ 분단의 이유이겠죠.. 저도 도통 이해가 안되는 일입니다. 고정식 카메라로 찍는 조종실 밖 영상도 회사가 허락을 해줘야 가능한데, 회사에서 안된다고 해서.. 보여드리고 싶은 이착륙 영상을 못 찍네요... 암튼 영상 구상하다 보면 안되는 게 많아 아쉬움이 너무 많습니다 🙄😷 기종 전환은 회사의 필요에 의해 하게 되죠. 특별한 이유가 있지 않으면 대개 전환 교육을 받아야 하구요. 잘 아시네요.. 보통 6-7개월이 소요되지요 ㅠㅠ
현재 항공정비학과 재학생인데 항공법규를 공부하며 저도 궁금해서 찾아보니, 항공보안법에 칵핏 촬영 금지가 적혀있는 것은 아니지만 보안법을 토대로 만들어진 항공사 내부 규정에서 보안(분단이라는 특수상황과 보수적인 항공법 등등..의 이유)로 제한하더라구요. 보안이라 해봐야 이미 유튜브에 칵핏이라던지 혹은 시뮬레이터 등을 통해 많이 알려진 부분이기도 하고.. 별 의미는 없지만 말입니다.
기술적으로 봤을때는 에어버스가 기술적으로 상업적으로 진보한 비행기라 생각됨 1. Cockpit commonality A320 A330 A340 심지어 그 이후에 나온 A380 A350.. 비슷한 Layout을 가지고 있고, 조종사들의 기종전환이 보잉보다 쉬움 2.Fly by wire System. 에어버스가 A320 처음 여객기에 도입한 이후로 처음에는 조종사들이 익숙하지 못하여 사고도 많이 났지만 (Air France 시범비행 사고 AIr India 추락사고) 불행하지만 사고이후 Back Data가 싸여서 Fly by wire System자체의 완성도가 높아져 있음. 보잉은 B777부터 시작하여 B787 정도가 Fly by wire이고 심지어 B737 MAX에도 적용하지 않았음. US airways 허드슨강 사고를 보더라도. 비상시에 Fly by wire가 얼마나 조종사에게 대처할수 있는 시간을 줄수 있다는것을 알수 있음 매뉴얼이라도 에어버스는 기본적으로 컴퓨터가 개입을 하는 구조 3.결 A320의 도입 초반부 Fly by wire에 익숙하지 않은 조종사의 사고가 많았음 현재는 Airbus자체가 사고사례를 기반으로 꾸준하게 Fail Safe로 Fly by wire가 진보되고 있음 보잉보다 Fly by wire에 대한 Back Data가 더 많은것을 봤을때.. 그리고 Fly by wire자체가 이제 Standard로 잡혀져 있는것을 볼때 향후 보잉의 왕좌는 쉽게 지켜지지 않을것이라 보임
At least until lately, many pilots I've spoken with (a lot of work travel) preferred Boeing's "feel" and pilot's ability to override "safety settings" in difficult landings and takeoffs, especially regarding amount of thrust available, and control feedback.
Very good video and a fair answer. I’m a lifelong Boeing guy from a Boeing family but even I can see where Airbus is passing Boeing. Their Top management seems more focused on the diversity of Boeing’s workforce than providing what customers want. And they tease with some new aircraft they might launch next decade while waiting for the technology. Winners and leaders MAKE the technology happen not wait for someone else to develop it. Elon Musk is a great example if that.
Hello, hi... I have lots of Boeing guys around me but they just keep saying that Boeing is always top.. without even considering how Airbus has been doing. You're the first Boeing man I've ever seen.. who has completely different opinion in mind. and the last sentence.. that's really awesome one, may I quote that sometimes? 😄 thank you so much for good comment.. Have a great day!!
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you for your nice reply, Captain and of course you can quote anything I wrote to you no charge, hahaha. Keep up the great videos and happy landings to you and your crews. P. S. My Korean wife says…..안녕히 계세요
Um. The problem with Boeing's management is not bothering about diversity (that's some blatant misdirection you must have heard from some conservative anti-diversity propagandists) but focusing on short-term financial gain. Boeing started to go downhill after the merger with McDonnell Douglas that resulted in the takeover of the latter's corporate culture. Moving headquarters as far away from the factories as possible sent a quite clear message as to management's view of the actual engineering & manufacture. But the real blows came in the form of outsourcing (subsidiaries independent of Boeing in name only are meant to shift manufacture to non-union plants while spreading responsibility). Things got even worse when development itself was made subservient to the goal of short-term financial gain: the root cause of the B737-MAX debacle was the aim to avoid certification as an entirely new type, so engineers had to fit the significantly larger new engine on a basic airflame too low for those engines to fit under the wings, leading to balance problems, leading to the stopgap solution of MCAS. I must note that the diversity misdirection is especially weird when made in the context of the Boeing losing the battle against Airbus. Diversity is pretty fundamental to Airbus's corporate culture, it being founded as a merger of several companies from different nations, and it had to merge not just different company cultures (like Boeing-MD) but engineer teams speaking different languages and following some very different engineering philosophies (say German vs French); but, in the end, this diversity turned out to be a positive rather than a negative. I'm also sorry that you still think Elon Musk is some positive example. The guy is the most successful con-man in history, and he is doing the same irresponsible things Boeing managements of the past 20 years did, only he was brazen enough to get away with the consequences, so far. Whether it's accidents with the non-full-self-driving-Full-Self-Driving, serial violations of his FAA permit for Boca Chika, or the lies he told to get government subsidies, or having the worst labour relations and workplace accidents record of any major company, or all the scammy announcements only meant to boost the stock price but then never fulfilled; Boeing managers only dream of that level of crookedness.
@@Daneelro Um. You’re wrong. I know Boeing from the inside. And top management is quite proud of their efforts to display and promote their diverse work force. Another case of affirmative action raising its ugly head.
@@Crazyuncle1 Oh, so you're not just a naive repeater of propaganda, you're fully behind opposing diversity, despite your Korean wife. Figures. Of course, it fails to compute for you that top management being proud of displaying and promote their diverse work force *in no way contradicts* anything I said. I said diversity is a good thing, as proven by Airbus's success, & irrelevant to Boeing's three-decades-long management problems. None of it is the fault of affirmative action. You have to have a certain kind of giant bias to not see that.
You are a very credible young pilot. This was extremely interesting from your point of view. Yet, I knew, in the end, you would pick Airbus!! Thanks for this really interesting video.
Hello~ thanks for the comment 😉 Yepp.. you're right but they're sometimes complicated even for pilots to understand. Boeing's Master controller of the engines is EEC, and they provide control swiches of it on the overhead panel as "EEC" and they never mention FADEC in the FCOM which is Pilot's manual. On the other hand, Airbus incorporated EEC as a part of FADEC which is a master controller and they've put its control switches as "FADEC" on the overhead panel. So like... EEC in Boeing is not the exactly same thing as the one in Airbus. This is how I understand about EEC vs FADEC.
안녕하세요 반갑습니다! 학구적인데 재미있다고 하시니 학구파신가 봅니다 😊 와 비행기 자주 타시네요. 380은 슈퍼로 불리는 게 맞아요^^ 조종사들이 관제사와 교신할 때 타고 있는 기종에 대해 언급해야 하는 때가 있는데 그때 A380과 B747-8 이 두 기종은 호출부호 뒤에 "Super" 를 붙이게 되어 있거든요. 스피킹은... 꾸준히 해야 하는데, 비행 많고 편집하느라 ㅜㅜ 암튼 좋은 댓글 고맙습니다 😉
the dual input happen on a boeing aircraft too... But i agree it's more obvious even if in high stress situation it happen. The system decouple the yokes and take an average if conflicting force exceed a force limit.
Whilst not defending Boeing's less that stellar record, especially of late, are you implying there have been no instances where an Airbus has had parts fall off of them? For starters, America West Airlines Flight 2747 (A320) says hello!
I totally agree with you!!! But, you should have mentioned "AIRBUS" is a conglomeration of many countries engineering design.... where "Boeing" is only ONE country and thus has a more narrow minded focus!!! Thus, more minds through different nation's engineer's shows there is more input to design in structure of each aircraft!! Thus I as a passenger can see and feel this in flying on both AIRCRAFT carrier's!! I prefer ("AIRBUS") Engineering and flight characteristics!!!👍😉
안녕하세요, 기종별로도 차이가 있습니다. 소형기, 대형기의 비행 수당 단가가 우선 다르구요, 각종 수당이 많은데.. 같은 대형기라도 어디를 얼마나 다녔느냐에 따라 꽤 차이가 납니다. 예전 회사에서 A330, B777 모두 대형기로 분류가 되어 있었지만 급여 차이가 꽤 났었어요.
@@governor_check 대형기라도 장거리의 범위가 다릅니다. A330은 미서부, 유럽, 대양주가 가능하고 B777, 787이나 747, A350, 380 같은 기종들은 미동부까지도 커버가 되죠. 그래서 당연히 급여는 더 멀리 가는 얘들이 연장 수당이라는 것이 더 많아서 급여가 더 높습니다.
@@띠용-r2h9x 안녕하세요, 그 수당은 꼭 어떤 게 많다라고 말할 수는 없어요. 소형기 조종사도 국내선에 한해 이착륙 수당이 나오고 국제선을 나가면 그 부분은 해외 체제비로 받습니다. 때론 소형기의 이착륙 수당이 많을 때가 있고.. 때론 대형기의 체제비가 많을 때도 있습니다. 즉 큰 차이는 아니라는 거죠 🙂
안녕하세요 기장님. 파일럿을 꿈꾸며 공부 중입니다. 요즘 한국 항공사에 외국 조종사들도 제법 많이 고용된다고 들었는데, 반대로 외국 항공사들도 한국 조종사들을 많이 고용하나요? 항공사를 꼭 한국 항공사를 목적으로 하지않더라도 괜찮을까싶습니다. 또 파일럿에게 가장 크게 느껴지는 해외 항공사(대표적으로 미국, 일본 등)과 한국 항공사의 차이점도 궁금합니다
안녕하세요, 지금은 코로나로 모든 게 정상이 아직은 아닙니다. 예전에는 중국, 일본, 베트남, 태국, 중동 등 많은 한국 조종사들이 해외로 진출했지요. 물론 거꾸로 한국도 K사 같은 경우 제가 있을 때 외국인 기장이 엄청 많이 있었지요. 앞으로 상황이 더 호전된다면 나이가 또 많지 않다면 해외로 나가는 것도 나쁘게 보지는 않습니다. 다만 중국의 경우는, 아주 독특한 특성들로 사실 스트레스가 꽤 컸었습니다. 주로 훈련, 심사와 관련된 것이었죠. 다른 나라들은 그렇게까지 심하지는 않습니다. 급여의 차이와 밖에서 사는 고충 등을 잘 타협해서 결정해야겠지요.
"we won't be going, if it isn't a Boeing" a pilot once said to me in Hong Kong in 1993 to the very question of the video. I understand the pros and cons of each type as detailed here, but the one single thing that worries me here is the switch positions, Down for Boeing on and Up for Airbus on. That needs to be standardised to 'down on', as is normal convention for most electrical systems. If a Pilot were in A Boeing one day, and an Airbus, the next, then some hesitancy or disorientation will creep into operations, and that's not good. I daresay avoidance of 'disorientation' is a vital safety factor. Even as a European myself, I sort of favour Boeing, who set the standards long before Airbus, and have a good design philosophy on feedback systems; If Airbus want to do the opposite out of pride or individualism, then that introduces room for error. And that's never good. As a passenger, who drives mostly shopping trolleys, my favourite Boeing is the 777, and my favourite Airbus use to be the A340, but I do like the A380 these days.
Hi~ glad to have you here! and I totally agree to your comment.. In 2010, JAN.. I was doing my captain OE(operation experience) flight with a line instructor. All of a sudden, the plane started to get bumpy.. I gave a glance to the seatbelt sign.. and it was ON! Hmm.. since when has it been ON?? Ok anyway... As the ride got bumpier, my instructor told that.. Captain~ When are you gonna turn the seatbelt sign ON? WHAT?? Before I moved to B737 for captain upgrade, I had flown A330 for more than 9years! You know what happened 😄
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Many thanks for your personal response. As someone who test complex electronic systems, I am always happy to provide a useful comment or oberservation. Just leaving this weekend to Dubai from Dublin on Emirates 777-300ER, and then again on Emirates to BKK on an A380-800.
@@29brendus this has been the standard on european planes since forever. And since airbus is a combination of multiple european airplane companies that has become the standard in airbus as well.
Hello 😄 when I was in China, I had some friends from SQ A330. they might have said that. Though I can't recall their names but I miss them all~ Thanks for comment!!
제가 곧 destination 커리어를 정해야하는데 의견이 듣고 싶습니다. 사우스웨스트 평생 737만 타야하고 하루에 2~4 legs of flying(평균 3개) 이지만 Legacy 항공사보다 돈 훨씬 많이받고(은퇴시 40~60억 차이), 스케쥴 flexible 하고(원하는 날에 쉴수 있음) 한달에 min 17-18 days off, 회사 재정탄탄하고 (레이오프 걱정없음), 더 일하고 싶으면 incentivized open time trip을 할 수 있음. 국외로 잘 안나가기 때문에 도시락 싸가지고 다닐수 있기때매 건강 챙기기도 가능(?), 해외 스케줄로 인한 시차적응 필요없고 red-eye flight도 (현재로썬) 없음. 나중에 일 많이하기 싫으면 내 스케줄을 다른사람이 pick up 하면 한달에 20 days off 도 가능 VS 레거시 에어라인 schedule flexibility는 없다고 봐도 무방하고(12-14 day off), 입사 초반에 혹시라도 뭔일 터지면 레이오프 확률 높아지고, 시차적응 해야하고, Widebody 타려면 시간 오래걸리고 (캡틴의 경우 14~17년 걸립니다), 돈은 좀 적게벌지만 320,777,787 등 여러가지 기종 기회가 있고, 리저브(한달내내 스탠바이로만 근무) 하면 한달에 4~6일 정도만 일하는 스케줄도 가능하고(비성수기), 크루밀나오고, widebody타면 일하는 강도가 다르고, 737 같은 쓰레기비행기(?) 안타도 됨. 어떤게 더 좋은 선택 같으신가요?
안녕하세요.. 정말 쉽지 않은 선택입니다. 댓글을 보고 함께 비행 온 동료와 얘기를 해 봤는데.. 저 같은 경우 50대 중반이고 장거리를 많이 다녔다보니 사실 사우스웨스트 쪽이 더 끌립니다. 하지만 신입 조종사와 또 기성이라도 대형기 경험이 없는 분들은 대형기에 대한 갈망이 엄청나게 크죠. 조심스레 제 의견을 말씀드리면, 레거시 쪽으로 가실 수 있다면 그 곳에서 시간을 좀 보내시고 나중에 50대 접어들어 옮기시는 걸 추천드려봅니다.
0:02 Hello guys!
When it comes to the volume of selling, Airbus has already outrun Boeing.
But I just wanted to give some kind of Symbolic meaning of a manufacturer who had been a champion for a long time.
Also..
Regarding introducing airplanes ever produced from both companies,
I purposely left out some of them since it's too many and I thought that it could be better to say it as a family if possible,
like A320 family or A300 family.. Lots of you have left the comments saying I missed A310 😅
That's the reason why!!
One more thing..
Sidestick of Airbus was introduced in 1987 by A320, not in 1994 by A330..
my bad! Idea that I wanted to give you was not letting you know the exact time but like..
"it's been long ago.. concept" anyway.. I should have been more careful!
Thank you for watching and comments 😊👍
Sidestick of Airbus was introduced in 1987 by A320, and it crashed during test demonstrations on first flight with passengers due to error on fly-by-wire.
@@navsofour2892 didn't know that.. thanks for letting me know it!!~
Your argument in respect of omitting specific reference to the A310 is illogical when you have named every other
@@navsofour2892 I think you have the reason wrong.
@@captainjksaviationlife248 What you said about Boieng's approach to "putting computers on planes" made me curious about your thoughts about all the trouble with the 737-800 MAX, and what was (how I've understood it) issues with something that was supposed to help keep the plane level, but ended up making the plane nosedive.
Now I'm not sure if you can talk about specifics like that, but is a result of Boeing trying (and I guess failing) to change their approach?
Edit* After writing this comment I saw that you had a dedicated video on this subject.
Nice video. apart from the yoke difference, most videos focus on the outer difference. nice to see an in-depth perspective of the cockpit diferences
Thank you for your comment! 😊
Not just outer,or indepth, even their fcoms, fppm, completely different, Boeing manuals are very graphical, airlines tailored them to tables, different colors for diff scenarios,Blue for Wet/TO，
Airbus manuals explained more,better organized, more details in Flt Planning, u will not find CLB/DSC info on Boeing, nor ISA∆>>so, it takes a very hands-on n focus guys to fly Boeing, even downright to Dispatch n AME,..we used to use our I.Ds as rulers to plot RTOW years back, today it's on iPad...Flysmart, OPT, Foreflight, just don't Fly stupid.
Ha..safe skies everyone!
@@conned ID as a ruler 😄😁
FlySmart was so impresive when I first faced it! and.. I remember that was quite long time ago when Boeing had nothing like that
@@captainjksaviationlife248 wait till u see Mission+ or Fltdeck Pro ... currently using Foreflight+ ... awesome tool,
The neighbour of my grand parents is a retired (2018) Lufthansa pilot.
He too flew both and for him Airbus has the upper hand.
Boeing needs Airbus and Airbus needs Boeing. Competition pushes innovation otherwise they stagnate. I love them both.
That's exactly what I'm thinking 😊
It's more complicated, the 320 Neo pushed to the 737 Max, but it's market awareness that pushed the 320 Neo.
To cooperate is obviously a better way to develop a make progress than competition. Scientists in universities around the world share information with each other for that reason. Competition is to make money for your self or your corporation.
In a word McF, Yes.
Maybe, or just introduce sanctions. Nowadays that’s the American way to go. Wasn’t that’s the case between 2016-2020?
I follow a lot of aviation channels but this one stood out to be one of the best. Well made, edited and full of ultra useful content. Thank you.
Thank you so much.. your comment means a lot to me!! 😉
This was educational and well-presented, thank you! More, you come across the screen as super trustworthy.
Thank you so much for your comment!!~
Fascinating to hear a captain pilot's perspective, thank you!
As a frequent international passenger in the past on many brands of planes I had no problem with boarding a Boeing 737 jurassic
or classic, 747 or 777 nor a noisy and vibrating DC 9 ascending steeply into the clouds.
These days I would flatly refuse to board any Boeing aircraft, especially the 737Max series.
I'd make sure my airline bookings result in Airbus travel of any kind with the A380 as the preferred option, most stable and quiet even in economy class!
Hello ~ 😊
Thank you so much for your comment!!
Boeing.. it's so sad..
I just hope that they could change quite a bit.. so people would turn their eyes to them.
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Yes it is sad indeed, after the merger of Boeing with McDouglas things went only according to profit, ingnoring even their own engineers warnings, so typically USA!
For your own personal saftey and your passengers, please apply your inborn wisdom and refuse to pilot any Boeing Aircraft if you can. Soon you might be in a position to fly C919 and Airbus only!
I as a technically inclined often marvel at the required knowledge, calm of mind, concentration and skill needed to fly a modern airliner whilst I am struggling to drive a modern vehicle safely on the road.
My highest respect and best wishes. 👍
I do the same. If there's only boeings flying, I will stay on the ground.
Boeing has safety issues with other types, including 787 and 737-NG. About that second one, there was issued with rudder (missing bolts and faulty hydraulic valve) long time ago and couple crashes related to it. Its very likely, that other types has hidden issues as well.
@@norbert.kiszka One more reason never to board a Boeing airliner as a passenger again if you can avoid it.
My recent Qatar flight on a 787 from Doha to Vienna ended in a scary hard and swaying landing, not sure if an Airbus would have performed better in those gusty conditions. I had little concern boarding a Swiss 777 seated like a tin of sardines on my way back to Australia via Hong Kong. The Qantas A330 to Sydney and the Qatar A380 to Doha I found a relive! 😊
Airbus has fixed the flaw of not communicating with the other pilot. Even with AF447 before this change was made, the side stick actually vibrates heavily to let you know that the other pilot is also trying to control the aircraft
Exactly!! Though I'd flown A330 for more than 15years, the only thing I didn't like was what you just mentioned
"the side stick actually vibrates heavily to let you know that the other pilot is also trying to control the aircraft"
On the A320 family the aircraft will say "DUAL INPUT." You can't miss it unless you are deaf.
Good, i would imagine even more Force Feedback might be a good idea. But that is me a PC Gamer talking
Airbus did not fix the dual input at AF447. AirAsia had dual input which led to stall.
@@encinobalboa What ?
I am french, and thank you for comparing that. Very interesting
Merci d'avoir regardé 😉
Have a great weekend~!!
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Merci à vous pour votre objectivité.
항덕에 입문하고 싶은 1인입니다. 두 항공사의 퀄높은 비교영상으로 더욱더 이해가 잘 됩니다. 따로 노트해서 암기라도 하고싶을 정도네요ㅎㅎ. 감사합니다
감사한 댓글.. 너무 고맙습니다! 형광펜 드릴까요? ㅎㅎ 좋은 주말되세요 😉
Very good, calm, informative and without too many ads. Does what is says on the tin!
Thank you!! 😊
👍👍👍 Well done, most informativ and a fair comparison between both types of airplanes.
Thank you 👍🏻🥰
05:38 - Airbus introduced sidesticks on A320 in 1988, not on the A330 in 1993.
You're right.. my mistake, because I have only flown A330.. I just wanted to say that the sidestick was introduced pretty early
Aloha from Kapaa Hawaii
Nice work! I'm a new hired at AAL. Very excited for the future & opportunity. I currently fly a Falcon 2000 made by the French.. I've to pick between the 737 & A320 in class, I'm definitely leaning towards the airbus. Some similarities with the Falcon 2000, clean & simple.
Good to have you here and thanks for comment!
Though I'm currently flying 787, I also lean towards the airbus cause it's simple and easy like you said.
Hope you keep up good work and good luck on your choice and your future! 😄
No comparison, go Airbus...larger cockpit and much quietier.
Go Airbus, with such a backlog of A320 family..... you will have a job for life & won't suffer the embarrasment of saying your a Boeing pilot
Nice video. Always good when a pilot talks about the differences between Boeing and Airbus after flying both. For those wondering what I said before I edited it, I asked which he preferred for handling, A330 or 787.
Hello hi~
Hmm.. it's not easy to give you the answer. But something calls to mind suddenly..
The wildest animal was B737, every time I was shooting an approach, it gave me real fun.
But in terms of airline operations with passengers, and to meet a lot of company regulations,
I feel more comfortable when I'm in Airbus.
Thank you very much for comment, buddy!! 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Ah I see so no preference btwn the A330 and 787 in handling. The 737 requires more inputs anytime it's disturbed in flight since it's just a typical basic airliner as far as manual hand flying goes, without the automatic hand flying assistance that the A330 and 787 has, whereas both would fight against disturbances thanks to the use of roll rate, pitch rate and g-load. The Airbus cockpit I always hear is very comfortable, so much so that even Boeing's best attempt with pilot comfort, the 787, pales in comparison to the Airbus. Thanks for the reply :) I'm definitely sharing this video.
Thank you captain for sharing your experience with the planes ,we passengers rarely have such insight. Safe flying if you are still on the job!
Very good video. You can give an expert opinion for sure. I am a retired Mechanic and would like to say I prefer the Airbus too. I like the way the Airbuses computer systems help the Mechanic troubleshooting faults. As a passenger, I feel more comfortable. When I worked Sheet Metal on Boeing aircraft, I found the materials a little beefier. On the Airbus, everything is precision made so replacement parts almost always aligned up with the pilot holes. I heard the old saying "If it's not Boeing, I'm not going" but I think that will be going away soon. Boeing has some catching up to do with Airbus. You are so right about the differences. Thank you.
Hello~ As opposed to your comment, the mechanics who I used to talk with in KAL prefer to be in Boeing planes. They said that Airbus ones brought up a lot of computer errors.
But I personally lean a little towards Airbus 😊
Great video, I was wondering about the differences from a pilot's perspective for a long time.
Thank you so much for your comment! 😉
Kudos for having been able to succinctly express the main differences in philosophy, with few examples, instead of details overload.
Actually as a once frequent traveller I can cabinwise relate to that, maybe the differences were even more pronounced in these days. The old Boeing feeling (707, 727, 737, 747): Solid, conservative, trustworthy, no-frills, with a touch of wagon (727, 737) or clipper (707, 747). As opposed to Airbus (A 300, A310, A320): Cool, French, sophisticated, but somehow impersonal, even boring. BTW: DC-8, DC-9, DC-10 were all likable, yet somehow odd. And the L-1011 felt like an interesting standalone.
Thanks for the video. This is about a topic I wanted to know about since a long time 😊
Hello and.. thank you so much!! 😘
You were very fair and professional and cited fascinating sublties of differences
The only airbus difference I don't like is the joystick. But now, I see the comfort of a n Airbus pilot tray table! Instead of a yoke.
Thank you so much! I didn't like the sidestick either at first.. but once I got used to it, it was super nice to use~
The perspective of an experienced pilot that flew planes from both competing companies was very insightful! At the end, I was surprised by your personal preference for Airbus.
Good to have you here!! Maybe that's because.. I'd spent most of the time in A330 😄
@@captainjksaviationlife248I’m new on Airbus products and have most of my time on Boeings. Airbus edges out for me as well. But in order to do so, as a pilot coming off Boeings, you have to drop the Boeing philosophy in order to fully embrace the Airbus. If you want to fly your Airbus, with “how Boeing does things” on your mind, you will never understand the Airbus.
With fly by wire a side stick is better. Because except for takeoff and landing the majority of time the autopilot is flying and a yoke takes up room. Similar to having a physical keyboard on a smart phone when majority of time one is consuming content not inputting it with keyboard.
@@10against1 has nothing to do with fly by wire in regards to autopilot usage. Both the side stick and yoke have their pros and cons.
@@10against1 Yepp~! Agreed 👍🏻👍🏻
I am a twice yearly passenger going from Manila to USA and back. Ride on economy claas of A350-900 and B777-300 and felt the comfort of Airbus vs Boeing thru their seating arrangement. Hope Boeing will improve the passengers comfort in their next and new production line of Boeing passenger planes.
Yes.. I also hope so. Boeing... they really need some time to reconfigure everything~
I flew a lot on different routes around Asia. I like 777 and 747. I never fly and will never on Max's. I will also not fly anymore on 787. I like A350 and maybe one day, if lucky I could try a 380.@@captainjksaviationlife248
This has more to do with airlines choice of layouts.
Wouldn't seat comfort be for the airline to take care of?
@@yasminbarry7941the cabin comfort and especially noise and vibration seems to be better on comparable airbus planes. I think that is what he means.
I used to fly with only one airline (I'm based in Asia), the flag carrier where I lived. It happened to be one of the most successful airlines in the world in terms of profit; professionalism of cabin crew AND safety record.
Now, ever since Boeing's repeated fiascos, ranging from its B737 accidents to its management's inability to up the quality of their manufacturing ending in their CEO's resignation (yet again!), I've decided to pick my flights not based on airline but based on the make of the plane being flown for my sector - I will pick the airline that happens to fly an Airbus for the sector I fly. NO MORE BOEINGS FOR ME!
It is another smart way for travel to choose "Type of aircraft".
I fly an A320. I do agree it would be beneficial to know the other pilot’s side stick position, such as during the ground control check or on takeoff roll. Aside from this mild inconvenience, I absolutely love the aircraft. It is a pleasure to fly, and it is very comfortable. My company bought some 737 Max. Most of our pilots do not want to fly on them.
Hi~ I 100% agree to your comment.. even I am now flying B787, I miss A330 😊
Nothing better than hearing this from a pilot. Thanks.
I can imagine, and I refuse to fly in a 737 max!!
" it would be beneficial to know the other pilot’s side stick position, such as during the ground control check or on takeoff roll."
If the other pilot is moving the stick you would hear "DUAL INPUT."
@@cosmicdebris2223 Other aircraft had teething issues. Inexcusable? Of course. But for instance the DC-10 went on to have a long and profitable career.
Sound quite even to me except for the Flightstick.
I really really would want Force Feedback to get a feeling on stress that is put on the plane. And of course immediately sense that the other pilot also tries to control the plane and there is conflicting input.
I guess Airbus will do something about it sooner or later.. They've been aware of that for quite a long time.
I have been trained and flew all the McDonald-Douglas DC 8-series aircraft. My favorite was, and still is the DC 8-63. I also know Boeing & Airbus as a consultant.
Wow.. that's a brilliant career!
So so good and informative video on Boeing and Airbus, sir.. well done!
Thank you for watching and your comment!!~
Great perspective and thank you for sharing your thoughts. Best regards
Thank you so much for your comment! It means a lot to me 🥰
The ‘On-Off’ toggle switches are typical of US standard. In Europe it’s the opposite as standard. It’s confusing as I live on both sides of the pond.
안녕하세요 기장님😊 전 학창시절부터 소문난 항덕이라 늘 파일럿 입장에서의 보잉,에어버스의 차이에 대해 궁금했는데 이렇게 자세하게 설명해주셔서 정말 좋았습니다 왜 진작 기장님 블로그를 몰랐던건지 ㅠㅠ 이제라도 알았으니 다행이네요! 😁 진짜 시절이 좋아져서 제가 다 호강하네요 ㅎㅎ
영어도 영어권국가에서 11년째 살며 NZ에서 일한 저보다 유창하시니 역시 캡틴은 아무나 되는게 아니라는걸 느끼고 갑니다! (사실 첨엔 랜덤영상으로 뜨길래 밤에 눈감고 들었는데 발음이 좋으셔서 놀랐어요)
앞으로도 좋은 영상 기대하겠습니다💕
극찬으로 가득하네요 댓글이 😂 너무 감사합니다^^ 영어는 공부중입니다. 스크립트를 쓰면서 영상을 준비하지만.. 정말 서서히 느네요. 요즘은 원어민 친구 한명있는게 작은 바램입니다. 유튜브에 좋은 쌤들이 많지만 혼자 하다보면 한계가 금방 느껴져요 ㅎㅎ 암튼 감사드려요 😃😄
Really good video, thank you !
As a sidenote, Airbus named FADEC and not EEC as FADEC can interface with different type of engine that use different controls. CFM and CFM neo using ECU and IAE, PW and PW Neo using EEC. They have different interface with the system in the plane and different datas are collected, thus having an "umbrella" name to cover both types of system.
Hello, hi.. thank you so much for comment.
It's been years since I left 330, my memory is a bit rusty about the relationship between those systems.
And I appreciate you letting me know about neo ones as well. Hope you keep me in the loop so I can hold the bridge to Airbus 😄
Also, Boeing calls EICAS what Airbus calls ECAM.
No, on the A320 it's EEC. From the V2500 IAE literature; "The V2500 uses full authority digital engine control.
The FADEC comprises;
1) Sensor Inputs.
2) Data Inputs.
3) The Electronic Engine Control Unit. (EEC)
The heart of the FADEC is the Electronic Engine Control. (EEC)
@rael5469 and the CFM56-A specification tells you
"The FADEC system consists of :
-an Engine Control Unit (ECU) containing two identical computers, designated channel A and channel B. The ECU electronically performs engine control calculations and monitors the engine's condition.
-a Hydro-Mechanical Unit (HMU), which converts electrical signals from the ECU into hydraulic pressures to drive the engine's valves and actuators.
-peripheral components such as valves, actuators and sensors used for control and monitoring."
The A320 CEO version comes with 3 engine options, CFM56-A (ECU), PW6000 (EEC) and only for the A318 the IAE V2500 (EEC)
For the NEO variant only 2 engines option exist, the LEAP-1A (ECU) and the PW1000G (EEC)
So the CFM FADEC uses the ECU technology and the PW/IAE the EEC technology
@@martinchab1 "So the CFM FADEC uses the ECU technology and the PW/IAE the EEC technology"
Right.....why are you telling me this? All I was saying is that on most A320 it's EEC. The FADEC is the whole system. The engine control is the EEC, not FADEC. For instance, I would never get a task to "replace the FADEC." It would be to replace the EEC. Even in your example it is the ECU and not the FADEC.
Really interesting perspective. First time I've seen this. Thank you!
Thank you very much~ 😉
Very informative and honest video. Really great job.
Thanks
Thank you very much for great comment! 😊
I zoomed out to press the like button only to find it liked. Awesome one!
Hahaha~ it was just like that 😄
Thanks anyway and have a great day!!
기장님 영어쓰시는거 들으니까 카리스마가 엄청나신거 같아요 ㅋㅋ 멋지십니다
안녕하세요^^ 카리스마까지 ㅎㅎ 감사합니다 🤩
Great video. Thanks for making it 👍
굉장히 직관적이고 실무자 관점에서 깔끔하게 설명해주셨네요. 잘보고 갑니다!
오 😍 고맙습니다!!
As an European I keep my fingers crossed for both Airbus and Boeing. However the quality issues concerning Boeing models seem to be bothering. Hope it will be overcome soon.
Hello~ thank you for your comment! I also hope they could transform everything to overcome..
I'm also for Airbus. As a passenger, I prefer the cabin door next to me to open only when an embarkation finger or ladder is firmly adhering to the exterior surface of the fuselage. But that's only my personal taste, I'll give you that. 😅
Hi~ 😉 Good to have you here! and thank you so much for watching and commenting~
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you, JK. Very good content! 👍
Lovely my dear captain. Well explained. Hope you are doing some flight training in your airline. Best wishes.
Hi captain!!~ thanks for your comment 😊
Sooner or later, I'll be flying as an instructor~
Im retired Captain (United, Western and Aerolineas Argentinas), i´m flew with MD10, DC-10 and B747, Boeing 727 and Douglas DC9, almost all time with B747 and DC10 and i prefer Boeing.... definitvely and positive! Best regards Capt.
Wow.. you're a lot senior to me, sir!! Thanks for comment 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you so much Captain, i wish all the best in your career and absolutely much success for you. I miss so much the yoke and friendly chats with partners, long time flying, my Queen of Skies and much things more, but that´s it, time is over. Best regards captain. Hugs.
So, you have not flown Airbus?
@joangg No, as captain I don't, as passenger? Lot of times! Haha!
Thanks for that enlightening briefing Cap....now, when booking my flights, I would check first if I am flying in an "A" aircraft or broomstick 🤭. Hope to fly in one of your flights Cap......Bon voyage🛫
Thank you for saying it like that 😄 It's gonna be an honor to have any subscriber of my channel..
AIRBUS is the second aircraft manufacturer in the world now? I thought it's BOEING
The purpose of this video was to let people know the difference between two from a pilot's
point of view.. so I had never researched the data like how many planes they sell..
You're right! Now I know sales volume of Airbus has been more than Boeing for the last 5years..
Airbus....Is nomber one...
As for the difference in toggle switches ON/OFF positions it could be due to the fact that in Europe (buildings/homes in general) UP is ON and DOWN is OFF, whereas, if I am not mistaken it's the opposite in the US.
Hello~ hi..
I believe that ordinary switches in the US are just normal as ON-UP.. unless I'm mistaken 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248You are very possibly correct, Captain. It would great if a US citizen could chime in!
Those confusing (or just different) switches are on the ceiling which is an inclined ramp above one’s head. I’ve always thought in terms of “moving forward” (down) or back (off), what results in the Up=Off impression (retired Boeing pilot, no experience with Airbus).
In the UK up is OFF and down is ON.......just like the landing gear on a plane and the plug switiches we have in our homes
In USA for things like light switches and Circuit breakers in buildings up=on and down=off, I am in USA.
Well, Captain JK, I think you gave just about as diplomatic an answer as you could choosing between Boeing and Airbus. As a passenger, I would lean towards Airbus being the better choice as well, but always lurking in the background is the AF 447 incident, and the MCAS issues that gave flyers pause. I'll have to go and check out your other videos, now. Thank you!
Hello, hi~ Thanks for comment.. but I guess you haven't go through to the end ☺
I recommend you to watch it again, at very end of it, you'll find me standing in the same side as you 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Yes, I did watch it all the way to the end, where you cast your vote 6-4 leaning towards Airbus, and that's why I said that I leaned towards Airbus as well (as a passenger, since I'm not a pilot), but I guess my point was that both manufacturers have had issues that have caused planes to crash so that's probably the perspective that I view things from. If I a pilot, though, I think I would rather fly a Boeing with a column than an Airbus with a joystick. I think every commercial pilot should have manual control to fly a plane (like a Cessna, as you say), rather than trust a computer/AI to make decisions for the pilot. The last thing I want as a passenger is to have a pilot in the cockpit who doesn't have the means to fly a plane at a very basic level.
@@nplus1watches35
Your comment means a lot to me, thanks.
As a pilot, why I lean a bit towards Airbus is not because they can cover me in the case that I make mistakes but because it's way more stable while flying manually.
As I showed you in the video, it's not easy to see what the other pilot's doing with the side stick in the Airbus.
But digging into AF447, even the brand new F/O made critical mistake, the other F/O could have overriden the control.
(There's a red OVERRIDE button, when it's pushed.. the other pilot cannot control the plane)
I "guess" both pilots at the moment were not able to recognize what was exactly happening, and the captain came back to the cockpit way too late.
As nothing is perfect, everything has its own flaws. So do Boeing and Airbus...
I don't know which one is safer from a passenger's point of view but as you said.. All the pilots are to be able to control the plane under whatever conditions...
Thanks again for good comment and We'll try!!
Just wanted to add that the AF447 incident happened because the computers totally left the flying to the crew. It wasn’t automation, it was the lack of it.
And MCAS is not automation. It’s a sad Boeing example of implementing shortcuts. Can you believe the Max aircraft is newer than the 787? It’s like both were made by different manufactures.
Consider MCAS wasn’t needed for the Max to be a good aircraft. MCAS was needed to mimic previous gen and avoid the need for new type rating for 737 pilots.
…and finally because MCAS was implemented without redundancy, using only one computer and one AoA sensor without clearly explaining its function to the crews.
@@miks564AF447 was so messed after the pitot tubes froze. From these everything was a mess. Computers did their job as they should but the pilots didn’t hear the stall warning due to stress. At last computer gave up.
Excellent video and Cspt. Jk's english is excellent as well..
Oh thank so much but my English is not yet as close as "fluent".. still need a lot of practice 😅
@@captainjksaviationlife248what year to what year U flew for each type and airline
Airbus joystick should have some visual indicator sowing the alignment of the other joystick.
That's another smart idea!!
I think there is a signal or some device to indicate which joystick is in use or maybe it came after 447. I also read that when the two joystick are use simultaneously they are disengage??
@@ross9581 If both pilots try to use their "Side Stick" at the same time a synthetic voice announces "DUAL INPUT !" Plus either pilot can take control of the side stick by holding the autopilot disconnect button in which case the aircraft will announce "PRIORITY LEFT" OR "PRIORITY RIGHT."
@@ross9581 " I also read that when the two joystick are use simultaneously they are disengage??"
Actually, if both pilots use their side stick the fly by wire system will calculate the combined input. It will sum the two inputs or subtract if they go in opposite directions. I think that way an instructor can safely add inputs to a student's inputs. But yeah, both side sticks will work at the same time unless one pilot uses the "side stick priority" function. We test the side stick priority function from time to time. It is a scheduled maintenance task.
@@rael5469 Thanks mate
Good evening Captain, how you doing? personal question.. In a very gusty and windy condition, you think airbus Normal Law mode makes the landing more difficult than make a conventional plane land?? Thanks a lot.
Hello~!! 😉
As I said in the video, 'Fly-by-wire' system uses electric signal to take pilot's input from a sidestick
and then flight computers send the signal to the hydraulic motors of control surface to react accordingly.
It seems like lightning fast, isn't it? Yes, it is.. But..
Compared to conventional 'Fly-by-cable' planes, it has a little tiny lag before the flight surfaces
actually move. Some pilots complain about it and say that it is a bit difficult to fly in windy wx.
But as far as controllability concern, I personally have felt almost no difference between two systems.
But if the weather gets really rough, not because of Airbus system, but because of the wide wing span
of A330, which I used to fly.. it was a bit hard to control the airplane on short final.
thanks a lot for your time and explanation Captain, I really appreciated that.. Can I ask you last question that I can't find answer because of conflicting sources? During FLARE MODE is there direct proportionality between side stick deflection and control surface deflection?? Or is always a roll rate and g factor demand but with less limitation? thanks..@@captainjksaviationlife248
이렇게 자세한 양사 비교는 본적이 없는 것 같습니다. 제대로 된 정보와 팁 감사합니다.
극찬을 해 주시다니 너무 감사합니다! 😊
Dieser Luftfahrtkanal Video ist der beste 👍👌💪👏💯 für mich. Sehr Gut, Erklärt in allen Belangen der Unterschied zwischen Boeing und Airbus 👍👌 Danke 🙏💐🇩🇪
I used to speak a bit of German when I was in high school.. But it was.. too long ago 😄
Wow.. thank you so much for saying that!!
Vielen Dank für Ihren Besuch! 😊👍🏻
Thank you very much for information🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍
Thanks! I wonder..... sorry, there's a friend of mine in Thailand who looks like you. Sawasdi krap 😄
Awesome video Captain JK. I appreciate you dumbing it down for the layman like myself.
I recently became interested in the Air France disaster in 2009 (the A380 that crashed after leaving Rio de Janeiro). I have watched several videos only including the documentary about the investigation. However, I still don't understand how something like that can actually occur. Can you make a video explaining this tragedy?
Hi~!! Welcome to my channel.. and thank you for watching and your comment.
The accident happened in 2009.. it was A330-200.
Sometime soon, I'll try to make a video telling why that was supposed to happen 😊
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you for educating the general public by making your informative and easy to understand videos
처음에 말한 최첨단자율주행전기차를 선택하느냐 전통적인스포츠카를 선택하느냐의 취향차이인듯 합니다. 그냥 자동차를 이동수단으로만 보고 편안하게 갈려면 자율주행차를 달리면서 느낄수 있는 스릴과 손맛을 느낄려면 스포츠카를 선택하듯이 그냥 편안하게 장시간 가고싶어 하시는 조종사분들은 에어버스를 선호하고 직접 거대한 비행기를 몰면서 짜릿한 이착륙의 손맛을 느껴보고자 하는 조종사분들은 보잉을 선택하지 않을까 싶네요. 그러나, 여객기는 어디까지나 대중교통이고 조종사분들은 직업으로 하시는 분들이시기에 조종 편의를 더 많이 제공하는 에어버스를 많이 선호하실듯 합니다. 여객기는 스포츠카처럼 개인취향으로 타는 자가용이 아니니까요.
안녕하세요^^ 사실 테슬라, 포르쉐 정도의 차이까지는 아니지만 일반인 관점의 이해를 돕고자 그렇게 비교를 해 봤습니다. 그러나 여전히 보잉과 에어버스는 추구하는 방향성이 다소 뚜렷해서 말씀하신대로 조종사간 호불호도 꽤 나뉘는 편입니다.
Good vid. Calming voice. Good point. Good English.
Wow.. it means a lot to me!
Thank you so much 😍
Thank you, Captain, for explaining the differences between the 2 leading aeroplane manufacturers. I have a student pilot licence and your point on the joystick vs. the yolk catches my attention. With the yolk aelerone control, both the port and stern yolks respond simultaneously as the pilot inputs their controls and you can visibly see it.
On the other hand, with the joystick controls, it seems that there is no way of telling who is taking control of the aircraft without a loud and clear communications. That leaves a grey area of concern as the risks of conflicting control command inputs into the aircraft exist, and is an area where Airbus needs to work on, as there is no way of telling which pilot is having control inputs, which can be disastrous, as you pointed out.
Hello.. You're on a training stage to go to airlines.. Keep up hard work!
yes.. Airbus's sidestick system is super comfy and stable.. I personally think that the point we're talking about should be clearly solved
Nice to see from a pilots perspective. I would think having less options on things like flaps would cut down on potential errors with the setting. We have witnessed a lot of pilot mistakes resulting from confusion with the controls, so I think taking a lot of the guesswork out of it would be a benefit. I guess it depends what you’re used to.
Thank you so much!
being right handed I also prefer to use a joystick in my right hand. I'd be uncomfortable sitting on the left in an airbus being forced to use my left hand to control the joystick especially given the responsibility. However, I still much prefer Airbus overall as a passenger and refuse to fly on 737 MAX aircraft. The thrown together compromise with software dealing with extreme design changes of the engine locations I find irresponsible (as we saw with the two fatal crashes before the "workaround" modifications and re-certification).
Hello!! Every pilot struggles to get used to the left seat during thier captain training
and so did I.. 😊
I believed that lots of people dispointed at Boeing's behavior regarding 737-MAX
I hope they would show us complete overhaul this time
Good run down of differences. I suspect that most pilots, by far, will always want to fly the one that Pays the Best! ;-) I mean .... am I wrong. Thanks for the post.
Thank you!! Your speculation is.. a bit right~ as most of the pilots fly to earn 😊
전통은 그 나름의 멋이 있는 법이지요. 제 성격 자체가 좀 보수적이라 보잉쪽에 마음이 가다가도 실제 조종사분들의 마음을 생각하면 에어버스에 끌리는 건 어쩔 수 없는 것 같네요ㅋㅋㅋ
조종사들도 확실하게 파가 갈리는 듯 해요 ㅎㅎ 제 경우도 에어버스를 좀 더 오래 탔었기 때문이 아닌가 싶기도 합니다.
It's also nice that Airbus doesn't kill their whistle blowers.
재밌는 영상 만들어주셔서 감사합니다 :) short haul 에서는 B737로 여러 이착륙을 하며 비행재미를, long haul 에서는 a330 으로 운항의 편한함을 즐기는게 베스트 이겠군요!
고맙습니다 😊 차처럼 바로 바꿔 탈수 있다면 그게 최선의 선택이겠네요^^
No way you used the missing ping sound from league of legends. I see a man of culture right here.
Haha 😄 now I know what you guys are talking about..
The missing ping sound.
Though I've never played lol but the sound is one of my favorite ones 😆
보잉 이슈에 대해서 영상 다루어주실수 있으실까요?
넵.. 한번 다룰 예정입니다~
Very good description of the differences.
Thank you 😊👍🏻
잘 봤습니다 선배님^^ 다른 영상에서 911이전부터 파일럿이셨다고 해서 아버지세대 영어발음 하실거라고 생각했는데... 대단하십니다 ㅎㅎ
동네에서 비행할때 ㅇㅇ approach(사는 곳 공개될까봐 가렸습니다) 주파수 들으면 원어민 아니라면 대형기 모는데도 정말 저걸 영어라고 하는건가... 싶은 기장들도 많던데요...
유튜브 하시는 계기도 그렇고 이미 기장이신데도 더 발전을 위해 노력하시는 것이 존경스럽습니다. 영상 고맙습니다.
좋게 봐 주시는 거 같아요 ㅎㅎ 영어는 옛날부터 새해가 되면 늘 결심해오던 그런 거였는데.. 작년이 되서야 다시 공부해보자 하고 시작했습니다. 요즘은 비행도 많고, 편집하느라 ㅎㅎ 공부를 거의.. 그래도 아직 꿈은 "원어민 처럼" 입니다. 죽기 전에 꿈을 이룰지는 모르지만요^^ 암튼 너무 감사합니다~
The only difference that matters to me as a passanger: Only one of them DELIBERATELY produce faulty models that simply fall apart in the air just out of pure greed.
Agreed, sir 😏
Nope. Airbus is the BIGGEST manufacturer in the world NOW.
Yepp! you're right..
But please see the comment that I have left and pinned at the top.
That's not correct if you take in all the military and space programs. Boeing is by far bigger, not including all the joint ventures.
Merci pour votre appréciation. Thank you for your fair advice. I learned a lot.
Hello~ thank you very much for watching and your comment 😄👍🏻
YP 기장님들은 주로 영어가 유창하신 것 같아서 승객으로 탔을 때 더 안정감이 드는 것 같아요. FO 신입분들이 많으신데 10000시간 넘는 기장님들이 많은 가르침 주실 것 같네요. 유익한 비디오 감사합니다.
좋게 봐주셔서 고맙습니다. 전체 숫자는 많지 않지만 경험 풍부한 기장님들이 대부분이라 후배 양성에도 좋은 밑거름이 될거라 생각합니다 😊
yp가 에어프레미아인가요?
And I believe it was on 2022 or 2023 that we've seen an incident with dual input on an Air France 777 during final approach. The yokes are of course inter connected and the pilots were fighting each other without realizing it.
Lack of feedback on the sidestick is not ideal, but the new ones they're going to use do not solve the dual input issue. Only clear and proper communication does.
Oh.. I haven't heard it before. You're absolutely right.. There should be proper communication in all phases of flight
지나가다 우연히 보게되었습니다.
아시아나 14년차 747카고fo 후배 인사드립니다!
저는 320=>772=>747 조종하고 있지만
보잉의 매력에 빠지게 된게 미국에서 747교육받을때 교관님이 하셨던 말때문이었습니다.
"에어버스는 컴퓨터를 믿지만, 보잉은 조종사를 믿는다."
저 말 하나로 힘들지만 자부심을 가지고
비행을 하고있으며,
사이드스틱으로 조종을하다가 요크로 처음 조종했을때 동체의 묵직함및 거동이 느껴져서 깜짝놀랐던 기억이 있습니다ㅎㅎ
영상 재밋게 잘 보았고,
자주 놀러오겠습니다~
즐비안비하십시오/^^
안녕하세요 반갑습니다 후배님 ㅎㅎ 이렇게 얘기해도 되나요 😊
맞습니다 두 군데 철학이 확실이 다른 거 같아요. 보잉이 때로는 너무 심하게 보수적인거 아닌가 라는 생각도 들지만,
말씀하신대로 나름의 고집과 철학이 주는 묵직함이 매력인 거 같습니다.
늘 안전 비행하시고.. 경력을 보니 업그레이드 하실 때가 다가오는 듯 한데.. 좋은 결과 있으시길 바라고,
가끔 댓글로 소통하시죠 반가웠습니다!!~
I’m team Yoke. Not a fan of the joystick. But as a passenger honestly doesn’t matter which plane it is to me. I’ll ride both.
The yoke always gives us more direct and raw feelings of flying..
As a passenger, I do not have any preferences either
@@captainjksaviationlife248 - yeah I would imagine so. The side stick just feels wrong. But you probably just adapt as a pilot. I’m just a Microsoft Flight Sim enthusiast. So my opinion doesn’t hold much weight. 🤙
A330과 350타고있는 에어버스맨인데, 공감가는것고 있고 아닌것도 있네요. 에어버스도 파킹브레이크시 페달 풀로 밟고 돌립니다. 뗄떼도 풀로 밟은 상태에서 파킹브레이크 풀고요. ㅎㅎ 스위치방향은 회사마다 커스텀 가능한데 위 아래 온오프를 바꿔서 할수도 있어서, 저희 회사는 반대로 주문했네요. 그래서 330심탈때 항공기와는 스위치 반대여서 헷갈리던 기억이 나네요
반갑습니다 기장님^^ 스위치가 옵션이었군요. 제가 330을 탔던 국내 k사와 중국항공사는 모두 보잉과 반대였어요. 절차적으로도 움직이는 상태에서 세울때는 페달브레이크를 밟아 세우고 파킹브레이크를 돌렸지만, 서있는 상태에서 파킹브레이크는 그냥 돌려도 되는 절차에 제한은 없었어요. 이렇게 항공사마다 같은 기종이라도 다른 점이 꽤 많다는 것도 조종사인 저도 신기하네요^^ 댓글 감사드리고, 가끔 이야기 들려주시면 감사하겠습니다 😄
항공기 이런건 관심 없는데 캡틴님 영어 쓰는거 보고 공부하러 옵니다.ㅎㅎ 저도 영어 잘하고 싶어요~ 근데 유학 갔다 오셨거나 외국에서 살다 오신건가요?
아 ㅎㅎㅎ 항공기도 관심 갖어 주세요^^ 저는 아직도 공부가 많이 필요한 완전 토종입니다 ㅜㅜ
함께 원어민 비스무리 해질 때까지 공부해요 😊😊
1:14 Isn't it an MD-80 series?
Affirmative!! 😊 B717 was like renewal version of MD80 after MD was incorporated by Boeing..
The biggest difference has to be the yoke vs. side stick. Yoke is placed on the center line of the pilot's body which is ideal for hand eye coordination while the side stick can force captains to use the left hand which for 7 out 8 people is the off hand and therefore less coordinated hand.
Actually all Captains sitting in the left seat regardless (yoke or side stick) will fly with the left hand on the yoke and right hand on the thrust levers. As a pilot I have spent 12 years in the right seat with yokes, 12 years in the left seat with yokes and the last 4 years in the left seat with a side stick. After 16 years flying around with my left hand as a right handed person, I prefer left seat with a side stick. You get used flying from both seats very early in your career.
I can't agree more to your comment!! 😉
I wonder about the relative safety records of the two manufacturers. Not sure what the metric is, crashes per year normalized to the # of planes of each type?
Thank you for your comment. I'm going to deal with that sometime soon 😉
기장님 한국은 왜 조종실내 계기판 영상 촬영이 안되는걸까요? 뭐 중요한 보안 사항이 있어서 그런걸까요?
그리고 또 궁금한건 항공사에서 근무하다가 기종변경은 조종사의지와는 상관없이 회사에서 일방적으로 통보하고 이루어지나요?
손에익은 기종조종하다가 다른기종으로 바뀌면 훈련하는데만 6개월걸리고 다시 매뉴얼 공부하고 시물레이션 훈련받고 스트레스 받을것 같습니다
그러게요 ㅠㅠ 분단의 이유이겠죠.. 저도 도통 이해가 안되는 일입니다.
고정식 카메라로 찍는 조종실 밖 영상도 회사가 허락을 해줘야 가능한데,
회사에서 안된다고 해서.. 보여드리고 싶은 이착륙 영상을 못 찍네요...
암튼 영상 구상하다 보면 안되는 게 많아 아쉬움이 너무 많습니다 🙄😷
기종 전환은 회사의 필요에 의해 하게 되죠. 특별한 이유가 있지 않으면
대개 전환 교육을 받아야 하구요. 잘 아시네요.. 보통 6-7개월이 소요되지요 ㅠㅠ
@@captainjksaviationlife248 해당 기종이 퇴역 하거나, 회사에서 매각해 버리면, 조종사 또는 정비사 입장에서는 어쩔 수 없죠... 기종전환 하기 싫다?고, 이직 (본인이 익숙한 기종 운용하는 회사)하는 것도 쉽게 결정할 일이 아니고...
@@jbs7946 대한항공이나 아시아나처럼 기종이 많은 회사는 필요에 따라..
또 소형기 부기장 - 대형기 부기장 - 소형기 기장 - 대형기 기장의 순으로 전환을 보통하는지라,
기종이 없어지거나 하지 않아도 보통 3-4번은 교육에 들어가죠
현재 항공정비학과 재학생인데 항공법규를 공부하며 저도 궁금해서 찾아보니, 항공보안법에 칵핏 촬영 금지가 적혀있는 것은 아니지만 보안법을 토대로 만들어진 항공사 내부 규정에서 보안(분단이라는 특수상황과 보수적인 항공법 등등..의 이유)로 제한하더라구요.
보안이라 해봐야 이미 유튜브에 칵핏이라던지 혹은 시뮬레이터 등을 통해 많이 알려진 부분이기도 하고.. 별 의미는 없지만 말입니다.
@@captainjksaviationlife248 분단하고 비행기 조종실하고 무슨 연관이 있을까요??😦😦
The bus has outrun the boeings. A great video Capt JK thank you!
Yes!! 😊 just like the comment I have left and pinned on the top..
Thank you so much for watching and commenting.. Have a good one 😊👍🏻
기술적으로 봤을때는 에어버스가 기술적으로 상업적으로 진보한 비행기라 생각됨 1. Cockpit commonality A320 A330 A340 심지어 그 이후에 나온 A380 A350.. 비슷한 Layout을 가지고 있고, 조종사들의 기종전환이 보잉보다 쉬움 2.Fly by wire System. 에어버스가 A320 처음 여객기에 도입한 이후로 처음에는 조종사들이 익숙하지 못하여 사고도 많이 났지만 (Air France 시범비행 사고 AIr India 추락사고) 불행하지만 사고이후 Back Data가 싸여서 Fly by wire System자체의 완성도가 높아져 있음. 보잉은 B777부터 시작하여 B787 정도가 Fly by wire이고 심지어 B737 MAX에도 적용하지 않았음. US airways 허드슨강 사고를 보더라도. 비상시에 Fly by wire가 얼마나 조종사에게 대처할수 있는 시간을 줄수 있다는것을 알수 있음 매뉴얼이라도 에어버스는 기본적으로 컴퓨터가 개입을 하는 구조 3.결 A320의 도입 초반부 Fly by wire에 익숙하지 않은 조종사의 사고가 많았음 현재는 Airbus자체가 사고사례를 기반으로 꾸준하게 Fail Safe로 Fly by wire가 진보되고 있음 보잉보다 Fly by wire에 대한 Back Data가 더 많은것을 봤을때.. 그리고 Fly by wire자체가 이제 Standard로 잡혀져 있는것을 볼때 향후 보잉의 왕좌는 쉽게 지켜지지 않을것이라 보임
와.. 저보다 오히려 더 잘아시는것 같습니다. 존경스럽네요.
At least until lately, many pilots I've spoken with (a lot of work travel) preferred Boeing's "feel" and pilot's ability to override "safety settings" in difficult landings and takeoffs, especially regarding amount of thrust available, and control feedback.
Yes, lots of pilots prefer to have "direct and raw feeling of yoke" I respect that opinion though I lean a bit towards sidestick.
Very good video and a fair answer. I’m a lifelong Boeing guy from a Boeing family but even I can see where Airbus is passing Boeing. Their Top management seems more focused on the diversity of Boeing’s workforce than providing what customers want. And they tease with some new aircraft they might launch next decade while waiting for the technology. Winners and leaders MAKE the technology happen not wait for someone else to develop it. Elon Musk is a great example if that.
Hello, hi... I have lots of Boeing guys around me but they just keep saying that Boeing is always top.. without even considering how Airbus has been doing.
You're the first Boeing man I've ever seen.. who has completely different opinion in mind.
and the last sentence.. that's really awesome one, may I quote that sometimes? 😄
thank you so much for good comment.. Have a great day!!
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Thank you for your nice reply, Captain and of course you can quote anything I wrote to you no charge, hahaha. Keep up the great videos and happy landings to you and your crews.
P. S. My Korean wife says…..안녕히 계세요
Um. The problem with Boeing's management is not bothering about diversity (that's some blatant misdirection you must have heard from some conservative anti-diversity propagandists) but focusing on short-term financial gain.
Boeing started to go downhill after the merger with McDonnell Douglas that resulted in the takeover of the latter's corporate culture. Moving headquarters as far away from the factories as possible sent a quite clear message as to management's view of the actual engineering & manufacture. But the real blows came in the form of outsourcing (subsidiaries independent of Boeing in name only are meant to shift manufacture to non-union plants while spreading responsibility).
Things got even worse when development itself was made subservient to the goal of short-term financial gain: the root cause of the B737-MAX debacle was the aim to avoid certification as an entirely new type, so engineers had to fit the significantly larger new engine on a basic airflame too low for those engines to fit under the wings, leading to balance problems, leading to the stopgap solution of MCAS.
I must note that the diversity misdirection is especially weird when made in the context of the Boeing losing the battle against Airbus. Diversity is pretty fundamental to Airbus's corporate culture, it being founded as a merger of several companies from different nations, and it had to merge not just different company cultures (like Boeing-MD) but engineer teams speaking different languages and following some very different engineering philosophies (say German vs French); but, in the end, this diversity turned out to be a positive rather than a negative.
I'm also sorry that you still think Elon Musk is some positive example. The guy is the most successful con-man in history, and he is doing the same irresponsible things Boeing managements of the past 20 years did, only he was brazen enough to get away with the consequences, so far. Whether it's accidents with the non-full-self-driving-Full-Self-Driving, serial violations of his FAA permit for Boca Chika, or the lies he told to get government subsidies, or having the worst labour relations and workplace accidents record of any major company, or all the scammy announcements only meant to boost the stock price but then never fulfilled; Boeing managers only dream of that level of crookedness.
@@Daneelro Um. You’re wrong. I know Boeing from the inside. And top management is quite proud of their efforts to display and promote their diverse work force. Another case of affirmative action raising its ugly head.
@@Crazyuncle1 Oh, so you're not just a naive repeater of propaganda, you're fully behind opposing diversity, despite your Korean wife. Figures.
Of course, it fails to compute for you that top management being proud of displaying and promote their diverse work force *in no way contradicts* anything I said. I said diversity is a good thing, as proven by Airbus's success, & irrelevant to Boeing's three-decades-long management problems. None of it is the fault of affirmative action. You have to have a certain kind of giant bias to not see that.
You are a very credible young pilot. This was extremely interesting from your point of view. Yet, I knew, in the end, you would pick Airbus!! Thanks for this really interesting video.
Oh.. you knew it 😎 yes.. throughout the video, I was kind of leaning towards Airbus 😅
보잉은 throttle, 에어버스는 thrust lever라고 부르는 이유가 궁금했는데 이 영상을 보니 각 회사의 철학이 담긴 명칭이라는 생각이 드네요.
저는 밥을 편하게 먹는 것이 가장 중요해서 제가 조종사 입장이라면 에어버스를 택할것 같아요 ㅎ
엄청 중요합니다 밥먹는 거 ㅎㅎ 보잉에서 밥 먹는 건 ㅠㅠ 너무 없어보여요^^
각각의 장단점이 분명하지만 저는 쪼오금 에어버스쪽 선호가 맞는 거 같아요~
EEC is a single component of the FADEC. FADEC is a whole system which includes EEC, sensors, probes, actuators, valves etc.
Hello~ thanks for the comment 😉
Yepp.. you're right but they're sometimes complicated even for pilots to understand.
Boeing's Master controller of the engines is EEC, and they provide control swiches of it
on the overhead panel as "EEC" and they never mention FADEC in the FCOM which is
Pilot's manual.
On the other hand, Airbus incorporated EEC as a part of FADEC which is a master controller
and they've put its control switches as "FADEC" on the overhead panel.
So like... EEC in Boeing is not the exactly same thing as the one in Airbus.
This is how I understand about EEC vs FADEC.
영상 잘 보고 갑니다~
한 가지 궁금한게 있는데, 기장님들은 한 기종의 비행기에 배정이 되시면 바뀔 때까지는 계속 동일한 기종만 운항하시는 건가요?
고맙습니다 ☺️
대형사처럼 기종이 많은 곳에선 소형기는 통상 2-3년, 대형기로 오면 그곳에서 특별한 일 없는한 계속 타게됩니다.
Great in site of these companies thanks for sharing
너무 학구적이고 재미있어요!
영상보고 지난주 탔던 비행기 기종 찾아보게 되었네요 :)
A330 & B737!
전에 A380 탈때 이층버스라고 해서 그냥 슈퍼 비행기라 애칭인줄 알았는데 에어버스에서 만들어 그렇네요.
스피킹 실력 👍👍👍 세요.
듣기평가 하듯이 엄청 집중해서 들었습니다. Thank you!
안녕하세요 반갑습니다! 학구적인데 재미있다고 하시니 학구파신가 봅니다 😊
와 비행기 자주 타시네요. 380은 슈퍼로 불리는 게 맞아요^^
조종사들이 관제사와 교신할 때 타고 있는 기종에 대해 언급해야 하는 때가 있는데
그때 A380과 B747-8 이 두 기종은 호출부호 뒤에 "Super" 를 붙이게 되어 있거든요.
스피킹은... 꾸준히 해야 하는데, 비행 많고 편집하느라 ㅜㅜ
암튼 좋은 댓글 고맙습니다 😉
the dual input happen on a boeing aircraft too... But i agree it's more obvious even if in high stress situation it happen. The system decouple the yokes and take an average if conflicting force exceed a force limit.
Make some sense...!
The real difference; Airbus doesn't fall apart. Boeings do! I don't want to fly on a Boeing!
Whilst not defending Boeing's less that stellar record, especially of late, are you implying there have been no instances where an Airbus has had parts fall off of them?
For starters, America West Airlines Flight 2747 (A320) says hello!
I totally agree with you!!! But, you should have mentioned "AIRBUS" is a conglomeration of many countries engineering design.... where "Boeing" is only ONE country and thus has a more narrow minded focus!!! Thus, more minds through different nation's engineer's shows there is more input to design in structure of each aircraft!! Thus I as a passenger can see and feel this in flying on both AIRCRAFT carrier's!! I prefer ("AIRBUS") Engineering and flight characteristics!!!👍😉
Very good insight 😉
좋은 영상 감사합니다.
혹시 기종별 파일럿 급여에도 차이가 있을까요?
안녕하세요, 기종별로도 차이가 있습니다.
소형기, 대형기의 비행 수당 단가가 우선 다르구요, 각종 수당이 많은데..
같은 대형기라도 어디를 얼마나 다녔느냐에 따라 꽤 차이가 납니다.
예전 회사에서 A330, B777 모두 대형기로 분류가 되어 있었지만 급여 차이가 꽤 났었어요.
@@captainjksaviationlife248
확실히 둘다 비행해 보셔서 자세히 아시는군요!
어떤 대형기가 급여가 더 높나요? 보잉일거라 추측해봅니다만....
@@governor_check 대형기라도 장거리의 범위가 다릅니다. A330은 미서부, 유럽, 대양주가 가능하고
B777, 787이나 747, A350, 380 같은 기종들은 미동부까지도 커버가 되죠.
그래서 당연히 급여는 더 멀리 가는 얘들이 연장 수당이라는 것이 더 많아서 급여가 더 높습니다.
저도 수당이 궁금하네요ㅎㅎ 협동체 조종사들은 착륙수당을 받는다던데 장거리 수당보다는 조금 덜 받는건가요?
@@띠용-r2h9x 안녕하세요, 그 수당은 꼭 어떤 게 많다라고 말할 수는 없어요. 소형기 조종사도 국내선에 한해 이착륙 수당이 나오고 국제선을 나가면 그 부분은 해외 체제비로 받습니다. 때론 소형기의 이착륙 수당이 많을 때가 있고.. 때론 대형기의 체제비가 많을 때도 있습니다. 즉 큰 차이는 아니라는 거죠 🙂
rational, thoughtful video. as a pax, I prefer Airbus - they crash less and large lumps of the fuselage don't break away!
Thank you so much for the comment 😄👍🏻
안녕하세요 기장님. 파일럿을 꿈꾸며 공부 중입니다. 요즘 한국 항공사에 외국 조종사들도 제법 많이 고용된다고 들었는데, 반대로 외국 항공사들도 한국 조종사들을 많이 고용하나요? 항공사를 꼭 한국 항공사를 목적으로 하지않더라도 괜찮을까싶습니다. 또 파일럿에게 가장 크게 느껴지는 해외 항공사(대표적으로 미국, 일본 등)과 한국 항공사의 차이점도 궁금합니다
안녕하세요, 지금은 코로나로 모든 게 정상이 아직은 아닙니다. 예전에는 중국, 일본, 베트남, 태국, 중동 등 많은 한국 조종사들이 해외로 진출했지요.
물론 거꾸로 한국도 K사 같은 경우 제가 있을 때 외국인 기장이 엄청 많이 있었지요.
앞으로 상황이 더 호전된다면 나이가 또 많지 않다면 해외로 나가는 것도 나쁘게 보지는 않습니다.
다만 중국의 경우는, 아주 독특한 특성들로 사실 스트레스가 꽤 컸었습니다. 주로 훈련, 심사와 관련된 것이었죠.
다른 나라들은 그렇게까지 심하지는 않습니다. 급여의 차이와 밖에서 사는 고충 등을 잘 타협해서 결정해야겠지요.
They are both fantastic and needed. The real problem is that we Must have more profits and a diverse workforce.
어.. 에어버스 항공기 소개할때 A310은 안나오는데요.. A300이랑 똑같아서 안넣은건가요?
네 ㅎㅎ 종류가 많다보니 다 나열하면 좀 정신없을 듯 해서 같은 시리즈는 하나로 묶어 소개드렸어요. A310은 A300의 파생모델이거든요^^
"we won't be going, if it isn't a Boeing" a pilot once said to me in Hong Kong in 1993 to the very question of the video. I understand the pros and cons of each type as detailed here, but the one single thing that worries me here is the switch positions, Down for Boeing on and Up for Airbus on. That needs to be standardised to 'down on', as is normal convention for most electrical systems. If a Pilot were in A Boeing one day, and an Airbus, the next, then some hesitancy or disorientation will creep into operations, and that's not good. I daresay avoidance of 'disorientation' is a vital safety factor. Even as a European myself, I sort of favour Boeing, who set the standards long before Airbus, and have a good design philosophy on feedback systems; If Airbus want to do the opposite out of pride or individualism, then that introduces room for error. And that's never good. As a passenger, who drives mostly shopping trolleys, my favourite Boeing is the 777, and my favourite Airbus use to be the A340, but I do like the A380 these days.
Hi~ glad to have you here! and I totally agree to your comment..
In 2010, JAN.. I was doing my captain OE(operation experience) flight with a line instructor.
All of a sudden, the plane started to get bumpy.. I gave a glance to the seatbelt sign..
and it was ON! Hmm.. since when has it been ON?? Ok anyway...
As the ride got bumpier, my instructor told that..
Captain~ When are you gonna turn the seatbelt sign ON?
WHAT??
Before I moved to B737 for captain upgrade, I had flown A330 for more than 9years!
You know what happened 😄
@@captainjksaviationlife248 Many thanks for your personal response. As someone who test complex electronic systems, I am always happy to provide a useful comment or oberservation. Just leaving this weekend to Dubai from Dublin on Emirates 777-300ER, and then again on Emirates to BKK on an A380-800.
@@29brendus Have a great trip!! 👍🏻😉
@@29brendus this has been the standard on european planes since forever.
And since airbus is a combination of multiple european airplane companies that has become the standard in airbus as well.
I heard from the pilots in my company(SQ), they said they prefer Airbus more!! Haha 😂
Hello 😄 when I was in China, I had some friends from SQ A330. they might have said that. Though I can't recall their names but I miss them all~
Thanks for comment!!
제가 곧 destination 커리어를 정해야하는데 의견이 듣고 싶습니다.
사우스웨스트
평생 737만 타야하고 하루에 2~4 legs of flying(평균 3개) 이지만
Legacy 항공사보다 돈 훨씬 많이받고(은퇴시 40~60억 차이), 스케쥴 flexible 하고(원하는 날에 쉴수 있음) 한달에 min 17-18 days off, 회사 재정탄탄하고 (레이오프 걱정없음), 더 일하고 싶으면 incentivized open time trip을 할 수 있음. 국외로 잘 안나가기 때문에 도시락 싸가지고 다닐수 있기때매 건강 챙기기도 가능(?), 해외 스케줄로 인한 시차적응 필요없고 red-eye flight도 (현재로썬) 없음. 나중에 일 많이하기 싫으면 내 스케줄을 다른사람이 pick up 하면 한달에 20 days off 도 가능
VS
레거시 에어라인
schedule flexibility는 없다고 봐도 무방하고(12-14 day off), 입사 초반에 혹시라도 뭔일 터지면 레이오프 확률 높아지고, 시차적응 해야하고, Widebody 타려면 시간 오래걸리고 (캡틴의 경우 14~17년 걸립니다), 돈은 좀 적게벌지만
320,777,787 등 여러가지 기종 기회가 있고, 리저브(한달내내 스탠바이로만 근무) 하면 한달에 4~6일 정도만 일하는 스케줄도 가능하고(비성수기), 크루밀나오고, widebody타면 일하는 강도가 다르고, 737 같은 쓰레기비행기(?) 안타도 됨.
어떤게 더 좋은 선택 같으신가요?
안녕하세요..
정말 쉽지 않은 선택입니다. 댓글을 보고 함께 비행 온 동료와 얘기를 해 봤는데..
저 같은 경우 50대 중반이고 장거리를 많이 다녔다보니 사실 사우스웨스트 쪽이 더 끌립니다.
하지만 신입 조종사와 또 기성이라도 대형기 경험이 없는 분들은 대형기에 대한 갈망이 엄청나게 크죠.
조심스레 제 의견을 말씀드리면, 레거시 쪽으로 가실 수 있다면 그 곳에서 시간을 좀 보내시고
나중에 50대 접어들어 옮기시는 걸 추천드려봅니다.
As a passenger, I don't trust Boeing planes anymore. If it's a Boeing, I ain't going.