I think the Earth isn't as old as science claims. If the world is some 4.55billion years old, I'm sure things like Technology and the rest would have been more advanced than they currently are right now. The world is young, I was born in 1991, and I can see in just my 31 years of living, things have changed drastically. Just look back at Cars in 1991, Houses, technology, education, etc, and compare that with today and notice how the world has changed so fast, this is to prove how new the world as a whole is. I believe this earth is no more than 6000 years old.
Modern humans have only existed for no more than 300,000 years, literally modern cognition, the ability to think like we do now only came about 40k years ago
Chris Rohrback you think that’s funny?? I can see that; bu the wild guesses in the rest of the video and what’s commonly accepted today aren’t actually much better. Most scientists are only parroting what they’ve been taught in school and really have very little idea what they’re talking about.
Not nearly as funny as "The Universe is 13 billion years old" (YEARS old. YEARS.. hmm isnt a year how long the earth freaking goes around the sun??) use your brain man.
Funny how there is a video with a guy asking citizens of the USA and Canada on how old is our planet or something like that... and most answers were like 2019 years old or 3000 years old :D
@@KrishnaKrishna-xu7vy hahaha already scientists started decreasing the earth years from billions to thousands (Theories can be replaced by another theory or cancelled.) Just check young earth theory.
2:50 Rock layers. After the Mt St Helens explosion, we now have observed the fast formation of rock layers. Which for those who base their conclusion on real, observable science, know that the proposed age of rock layers by theoretical earth scientists, is incorrect.
Winner of a video, been searching for "cosmic calendar astrology.com" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Bannrial Bizarre Bulldozer - (do a search on google ) ? It is a smashing one off guide for discovering your mayan day sign and the clues it has to your future without the hard work. Ive heard some decent things about it and my colleague got cool results with it.
A 1992 radioisotope dating research was conducted by Dr Austin on some Mt. St. Helens rock specimens. It failed to date the 10-year old rock accurately/precisely.
That’s because the sample was so young that it didn’t have any daughter material in it, those dating methods need both parent and daughter material so they can measure the ratio between them so the test would have given incorrect results because it was used incorrectly.
They age the fossils by layer it’s found in. They date the layers in the geologic column by the fossils. When the date doesn’t fit their preconceived notion’s of its age they throw it out . Those sneaky creationists have sent in rocks of known dates and ridiculous dates back . Roraima plateau in Guyana is supposed to be the oldest in the world. Billions of years old. In 1969 they broke rocks open and found pollen . The geologist said “ this is a serious problem “. They have never returned to do the follow up studies they said were needed . A lot of hard evidence says these dates are wrong . Robert Gentry did a great study published way back in 1976 showing these rocks formed quickly using polonium halo’s which form very quickly . Look him up
You wouldn't use a diamond to test the softness of toilet tissue nor would you use U-Pb or K-Ar (they have VERY long half lives) to date volcanic material that was erupted from a recent volcano. Contamination by various means, including older accidental material caught up in a young magma generating event can explain much of this "error". Strangely, C14 dating would likely prove more accurate, where you would date organic material (for example, trees) charred and killed by the eruption and incorporated into tuff units. C14, no doubt, has been tested THOUSANDS of times on trees that can be independently checked by tree rings. One isotope pair, similarly, is tested against another. Trust if it makes sense but verify. That's good advice in science as well as day to day living. By similar reasoning, do we trust Joe in his claims that he is honest, or wonder where all the millions and the mansions have come from, when his average salary over the years was in the low six figures? How are the Clintons, the Bushes, the Bidens, Nancy, and the BLM tomatoes worth 10's or hundreds of $millions? Praise the Lord for their delivery over poverty!!!???? Doctor Steve WANTS to prove a 6000 year old earth. I would never consider him impartial.
Nope! That's impossible, lol. Dinosaurs existed way before us. Before the dinosaurs, there was bacteria. They all needed time to evolve, and the Earth needed time to get less oxygenated.
10:56 that is seemingly Coruscant, not the earth 9:28 meteorites floating over a mirrored italian peninsula I know those just want to be aesthetic but want to point out where those pics might come from
Dear Burda, I tell You a scientific method which scientists actually used to determine the age of at least the nearby galaxial surroundings... and even farther. 1) First of all, in our solar system we measured the speed of light... it's about 300,000 km/sec - and the most interesting it is constant in time and space as well (see Michaleson-Morley experiment and its consequences). 2) Now, we have seen also the nearby stars' parallax by which we can determine their distance in kilometers or better to convert to AU (astronomical unit). 3) Among these stars we have seen many regular stars with a given spectral and thermodynamical characteristics - we found that the same charactreristics belong to the very similar stars with very similar brightness as well... Purely evidental! :) 4) After that we looked for the other stars which are shining much more distantly and used the well tested inverse square law for the brightness - by which we can precisely calculate many other stars' distance as well... And here comes the point just to overpass that biblical 6000 years of OUR galaxy at the first place - because there are lot of distant stars from where the LIGHT itself needs more than 10,000 years to travel to reach us, but we CAN observe them today (some even with our naked eyes, just we didn't know till yet how distant they are in real), so those parts of the universe in our galaxy clearly must be OLDER than that... 5) This so called "cosmological chain" which is based in pure EVIDENCE is not yet over! As we can measure also supernovea even much more farther then these already known stars, so here comes the hundreds of millions year regarding that part of the existing universe... which means: the whole is far more older than Bible says! 6) What even more: the most distant galaxies measured by their IA type of supernovea comes to the age of our so called "visible universe" (visible here means detectable), and that stays between 10-12 billion years depending how far we can follow this chain with a scientifically acceptable accuracy... 7) Farther we cannot see - and no one knows what is beyond that "formal boundary", which is enormously far from us about 13.8 billion light years away... ("1 light year" is the distance which light travels in one year - it is about 9460.5 billion kilometers). So maybe, maybe "there" is some kind of "God" residing somewhere out there - NO ONE KNOWS - and no one is able to falsify this possibility... BUT, that is pure evidance today that the whole universe is more than 13 (nearly 14) billion years old. This is what cannot be denied !!! Or people who do that will fall in that kind of group which I deeply feel is not necessary at all (to call some our brothers and sisters "sheep". :( ... But since 2x2=4 then our universe is so old as it turned out to be the case, and even if not all the writers of Bible or any other religious book writers was aware of it, that is the case !!! :) Science will NEVER "kill" "God", as You can saw above: there is and will be always some "place" for "God", and that truly will remain so forever till the end of the universe itself - but if science tells us something so clearly, then it really needs some kind of "blindness" to reject all the evindences which are laudly but gently speaking to all of us - and without science we would be dead - just think for the smallpox or plague which was horrible deadly disease not so long time ago... Slowly but surely, humanity can grow up, and as it happens whith Santa Claus, all of those our previous misunderstandings can be placed in an eternal valued shelf in our beloved memories... Whith respect! (a scientist, who are not willing to eliminate our historical tradition, because in some way it is also a "fact" whithin the history itself...) PEACE
Randal Bystry Although I'm a non-believer scientist, I think I can tell this in the name of many of those scientists who are willing to value the way itself how we evolved in a complex way, especially regarding how we though about the existance and universe, and top of that, about ourselves... Of course, a lot of those things are literally not true in which most of believers do believe even today - but this is also a fact that we started with the "flat Earth", and now just look at it where we stand... on the Moon and maybe within a century beyond... This is our journey all together, with many-many mistakes, and that somehow makes to this progress a kind of sense: it is a mirror of the past, just to look in it and to see where to go foreward. ;) Obviously, that is a different story: how to evolve even religions... This is really hard (almost impossible), because all of the believers are thinking in a way that so called "trueth" already has been revealed whith a maximal perfection - but this is not more just another "falt Earth". A prominent matematician (also philosopher) Kurt Gödel clearly found a rigorous theorem about this almost a cetury ago, that THERE IS NO PERFECTION, WHAT SO EVER, REGADING "KNOWING ALL" - of course this is valid even in the realm of "Gods". This fact (theorem) is absolutely having the similar magnitude, like "Sun is much bigger, and Earth practically revolves around Sun, so not the opposite is the case". This required paradigm-shift... But look at it again: everybody ignored Gödel's theorems for so many decades... just because those undeniable theorems states that even "God" cannot have these perfect properties, such as "omnipotent" and "knowing everything". - Now, think about it: how many more decades (or perhaps centuries) need to pass untill someone realizes that damn, it is not killing the "God", just telling that "every being simply needs to constantly improve his/her actual knowledge". For example: compared to the snails, we hopefully have much more knowledge - but who knows, maybe one day they will take over this planet millions of years after we wanished ourselves... and then: those snails maybe will have similar conversations about their origin - even can comprehend our Gödel's theorems again... :) This is why it is better to keep in mind "where we started" with all the mistakes, in order to avoid those thoughts that we "finished" every learnings, every discoveries, and this is why also important to improve somehow the old dogmatic religions to not make the same mistakes again and again... If we would complettely erase them, then this germ would start to grow again from the very begining. Wiser to manage to improve, not to erase it! I will never belive in any "Gods", those tales are (on today's level) really like Santa Claus - and in some sense that is also a nice thing, but seeing an adult having about 30-40 years and still believing in this tale, this is what frightening me, this is really bad, there must be some "near-scientific" view, at least... which is not killing the past, but having future as well! :)
f you studied enough, you will realize that all of his examples were based upon the wrong assumptions which are false. 1). False assumption - that the earth was created extremely hot which would result in a much different earth today that we observe....with plenty of water for one. 2) That all radio-active 'dates' agree. They do not, they differ widely. Just because we do not know how God created does not mean that He did not do the creating. God does not rely upon our knowledge in order to create.
@@danminer5343 LoOoL God is INSIDE you, not creating you, but consist of! The only one really BIG false assumption is that God somehow residing above this world and governing it... as it would be true, just look around in the crazy world how He is doing it taking lives - and oh, yes, You will explain even children's death by letting in the game the so called Evil... Leave these ''guys'' and let you study the pure LOVE as Buddha did... :) PEACE to all of us !!!
One more thing meteorites could have originated from the Earth and were shot out from the crust into outer space to this is also looked at in Walt Brown hydro plate theory book it places them in near Earth orbit and they come back once in a while and are caught by our gravitational pull.
@The Best Danica Barnaba Cool read the book by Walt Brown and you will have a good understanding of what was going on there. It's free online if you don't want to buy it...
The symbols floating around the screen at 7:02 are the biological hazard symbol, not the three-bladed fan style radiation warning symbol that was probably intended. Just tossing it out there as something I caught. It does not take away from the fact that this is an excellent video. Well done!
Si God Ang makaka pagsabi kung ilang taon na Ang ating daigdig. Walang sinumang TAO Ang makakapag Sabi na kung Anong eksaktong petsa o Araw kung Anong taon ginawa ni god Ang mundo. DAHIL si GOD Ang nagiisang gumawa ng lahat ng planeta at Mga bituin sa universe.
I just watched the above clip. They are correct, earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Gods sons crusificition on earth was a little over 1 billion years ago. We know that is took God-Lucifer 6 billion years to create Meri's soul, and all creation was formed around Meri, so we know that earth would be less than 6 billion. Great work on behalf of the scientists.
I just watched the clip, where they say that Aristotle was on earth 2000 years ago. That is not correct. Aristotles soul match spouse was on earth around twelve thousand years ago, but prior to this life, Aristotle only came to earth once at intial creation which was almost 1 billion years ago. Aristotle was on earth after Gods son was crusified when God allowed living beings on earth again. Then this life was Aristotles second life on earth, He was the Artist formely known as Prince.. That way you can easily find him when you get to Isadore. Aristotle is part of my working crew, he has traveled much universally.
Aristotle did not have any legacy on earth, other than his artist time, as the artist formely known as prince. it would be interesting to see who they are crediting with Aristotles work. Or even more so, who the being really was that was mistaken for Aristotle.
After Arsitotles life on earth, he went into the lifting to the light as all beings on the side of the good do. I invited him to join my working crew in Isadore, which he greatfully accepted as he could have residency in Isadore and still travel universally.
ATHEIST ASKED ME: How old is the Universe (Earth)? (And I will add what about 6 days of creation?) LET ME ANSWER YOUR QUESTION USING EINSTEIN and TIME DILATION. Please watch the very short Carl Sagan video clip below for context From Carl Sagan’s show the cosmos: ua-cam.com/video/83FDv0-USq8/v-deo.html In this video, Carl Sagan talks about two different types of time. Ship Time at the speed of light, and Earth time. The most important comparison in the video, is when Carl Sagan talks about the Ship Time to circumnavigate the entire Known universe (56 years for the Space Ship Traveler) and the amount of “Earth time” that would have passed for those left behind (Carl Sagan says, “they would [BE] 10s of Billions of Years in the Far Far Future” Earth Time). In fact, Earth would have been destroyed by our sun going Super Nova before we return, BUT for the sake of argument, we imagine again, that the Earth is still here. Now what is the conversation we would have, with those people on the Earth? We would exclaim-it is I, the space traveler, one of your ancestors, and only 56 years have passed since I left Earth. Of course, the people on the Earth would claim I was insane. According to our history, that space flight took place Billions and Billions of years ago, and there is no way you are the astronaut that left Earth so long ago. Question: Which group is telling the truth about the passage of time? Answer-Both of them Now the best part, what in the world does this have to do with the Bible, time dilation, and sheep herders in the Land of Israel 2400 years ago during the time of King David, and 2000 years ago with the Apostle Peter? Lets start with: 2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. It is very important to find out what Peter means by this statement, but first I want to concentrate on how Peter could possibly have come up with this statement. As Christians, we of course believe in divine revelation though the holy spirit is one possible way-but my Atheist friends are already groaning. The other possible way, is the Old Testament. In fact, Psalm 90:4 adds a critical component to what Peter wrote. Here is the verse: A thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night. So the first part of the Psalm, basically mirrors what Peter wrote, but the last part of the verse is key: “or like a watch in the night.” So what is a watch in the night-3 hours of time. There were 4 watches each night, for a total of 12 hours. WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN? For God, time is relative. If God chooses-he can spend 1000 of his years, in a space of only 3 hours of Earth Time. Or, if God chooses-he can spend a 1000 of his years in one day of Earth Time. Or (since this is a principle and not a dogmatic rule) if God chooses-he can spend a 1000 of his years in only 3 seconds of Earth time. Conversely, two thousand years can pass here on Earth, but for God, only 48 hours could have past, or 6 hours, or 6 seconds. The truly amazing thing is, until Albert Einstein elucidated his Theory of Special Relativity, ideas like these were relegated to science fiction. Today, this is scientifically possible in this universe. Now, think about the 6 days of creation, spoken about in the Book of Genesis. From who’s perspective, are these days given? Since man is not created until the 6th day-and the Bible says we are still in the 7th day, they must be from God’s perspective. Therefore, if time is relative for God, he can “live” 1,000, or 10,000 or 100,000 or 1 Billion years in one 24 hour Earth day. And, again, conversely, a 24 hour period of time could pass for God, yet a billion years could pass on Earth. Since this IS A SCIENTIFIC possibility, and not simply speculation, this can go a long way to reconcile the young Earth, old Earth debate.
@anonymous 67 Well that would apparently be a wrong statement, since plenty of people have read what I wrote. The Carl Sagan video attached to my post has hundreds of views by now. Thank God Have a blessed day.
@anonymous 67 Dinosaurs hey? You mean like the Notasaur secular scientists talk about today in this modern secular science video clip? ua-cam.com/video/Cj93zE2c83w/v-deo.html OR in this article about a supposed 65 million year old T-Rex. WHAT NONSENSE FOR 300 YEARS ACCORDING TO MARY SWEITZER IN THE ARTICLE BELOW, THEY TAUGHT BY SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTATION, THAT ALL BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS WOULD BE GONE WITHIN ONE MILLION YEARS PERIOD. SO I AGAIN SAY WHAT NONSENSE TO say that the Notasaur could preserve MOST OF ITS SKIN AND GUT CONTENTES FOR 110 MILLION YEARS. ARTICLE Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained By Stephanie Pappas, Senior Writer | November 26, 2013 07:01pm ET The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay. The research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, explains how proteins - and possibly even DNA - can survive millennia. Schweitzer and her colleagues first raised this question in 2005, when they found the seemingly impossible: soft tissue preserved inside the leg of an adolescent Trex unearthed in Montana. "What we found was unusual, because it was still soft and still transparent and still flexible," Schweitzer told LiveScience. The obvious question, though, was how soft, pliable tissue could survive for millions of years. In a new study published today (Nov. 26) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Schweitzer thinks she has the answer: Iron. Iron lady Iron is an element present in abundance in the body, particularly in the blood, where it is part of the protein that carries oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. Iron is also highly reactive with other molecules, so the body keeps it locked up tight, bound to molecules that prevent it from wreaking havoc on the tissues. After death, though, iron is let free from its cage. It forms minuscule iron nanoparticles and also generates free radicals, which are highly reactive molecules thought to be involved in aging. "The free radicals cause proteins and cell membranes to tie in knots," Schweitzer said. "They basically act like formaldehyde." OCCUMS RAZOR: The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one. So according to the article-for 300 years-science taught that fossils, which have to be millions of years old, could not and would not have any biological materials left. According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, all fossils are “rocks,” even the bone materials are gone. However, now today Evolutionists know differently but they keep sticking to their millions of years MANTRA story. The History of dinosaur artifacts like cave paintings and pottery, proves beyond a reasonable doubt, that men living even a few thousand years ago must have “put their eyes” on these creatures. Furthermore, FREE RADICALS, antioxidents and mary Schweitzer’S THEORY WHERE IS THE LOGIC? Free Radicals Medical Definition: an especially reactive atom or group of atoms that has one or more unpaired electrons; especially : one that is produced in the body by natural biological processes or introduced from outside (as in tobacco smoke, toxins, or pollutants) and that can damage cells, proteins, and DNA by altering their chemical structure. Anti-Oxidents Definition: a substance that inhibits oxidation, especially one used to counteract the deterioration of stored food products. a substance such as vitamin C or E that removes potentially damaging oxidizing agents in a living organism. So the Article claims that iron in the blood can preserve the tissues like a type of formaldehyde Now I have to break one of my rules not to use evidence from a Creationist Scientist because no one else dare talk about it. The man in the video is Mark Armitage Lets Watch the Video ua-cam.com/video/iN04I8HuFGw/v-deo.html Why was Mark Armitage fired? Do “evolutionists” seem to care about following the evidence where it leads? Do “scientists” in general have a bias? What is wrong with Mary Schweitzer’s theory of “Free Radical Iron” acting like a tissue preservative? ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM VIDEOS studio.ua-cam.com/users/videouZ0Fg2Jju0Y/edit studio.ua-cam.com/users/videoLd_3cCjM0SU/edit Why won’t scientists allow a Carbon 14 test to be done? Why-is the previous “science belief” of 1 Million Years max for biological materials thrown out-instead of realizing that perhaps the Dinosaurs in question are NOT older than 1 Million Years? What happens to Scientists that don’t toe the Evolutionary Fairy Tale? A GOOD HELPING OF EVOLUTIONARY BIAS ANYONE. THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION-EVERYTHING-EVEN SCIENCE IS PC.
With all these theories to rock dating, how come none of them have actually created a rock, waited some 10+ years, and tested it (by someone else) to be correct. All they do is credit people, and yet none of them have actually been there to test it. Does anyone else see something wrong with this?
As far as im concern is that Bible doesn't say about the age of the earth but it is humans who tries to calculate using Bible !!! God leaves manythings for humans to explore inorder for us humans to have excited lifes and to let us mismarized by its Creation!!! And to those who says wre are the dinosaurs in the Bible, i will like to says that Bible is not an anthropology textbook ,. There are many animals which are not mention in the Bible except sheep,lion,camels,dove etc so dont say wre is dinosaurs coz the word dinosaur is an English term, it may be mentioned by different term like bohemod ,laviathan and so on
God always explain that to Isadores residents. You are apart of Meri as creation was inner-woven into her. which is probably another good reason to end sufferage.
The entire earth is the same age. The idea that different layers of the earth are different ages is rediculous. Thats like saying diferent aspects of a living human are different ages. The entire human was born on the same day.
The mater is the same age but not the layers which forms at different times they’re measuring the time that the rocks cooled down and became solid. But that’s completely different to humans because although I may be 32 years old none of the cells in my body would be that old as they would have been replaced by new cells by now.
The entire earth is not at all the same age. The earth formed by gravity over millions of years. While a human have a day of birth, the whole human body is not the same age. Cells die and new cells are formed. How come you do not know this? Are there other things you do not know? What shape is the earth? What are planets? Do space even exist?
@@jaymz1999 the hydrogen/ helium atoms are 13.6 billion years old. The other atoms are younger having been formed in various stars of different ages since. Every time a giant star dies and goes super nova, more heavy elements are created. Most of the material in our solar system is basically the same age, of course new atoms created by radioactive decay vary, such as a lead atom created by the decay of uranium. Nun the less all the actual protons and nutrons originally created were made in the big bang, and were hydrogen an helium.
The "Accretion Disc Theory" for the solar systems formation is now itself History, thanks to the recent discoveries of the many exo-planet solar systems around nearby stars, which reveal our solar system is very peculiar. This alone has caused a reappraisal of the solar system and a realisation that Earth, Mars, Saturn & its moons all have a similar tilt to their axis which implies they could not have formed at the same time as most of the rest of the solar system and are in fact a group of planets that must have been drawn into this solar system as one group some time in the solar systems History by our current huge Suns gravitational pull. Worse Uranus also exhibits an impossible tilt of almost 90 degrees implying it too has been drawn in some time in the past. Now that a number of probes have been sent to numerous Comets, it has become apparent that Comets, asteroids and meteorites while behaving in slightly different ways are all in fact chunks of rock that were once part of one or other planet in this solar system. Most likely thrown into space by the cataclysmic chaos that would have occurred when new planets were drawn into this solar system. So the age of Earth and the other planets in this solar system will not have one common age but at least three different ones. Cosmic Science is starting to change rapidly as a number of new and important discoveries are being made that upset many long held concepts relating to our solar system. Indeed a major row is brewing within the scientific community, as another bombshell has just been delivered not by scientists but by a High-Tech Electrical Engineering company (in July 2019), who have turned Physics itself on its head, by breaking Newton's Law of Gravity !!!
I think the Hindu texts in Sanskrit give a more realistic time scale for the universe and earth, not just six thousand years. The universe is not “created “ out of nothing in the biblical sense. The universe goes through repeated cycles of projection, sustenance and destruction, only to repeat the cycle again.
after a billion of years -- we got global warming , acid rain and other natural disaster --- --- is natural disaster common in the past(i mean billion years ago)? before human had knowledge ? --- i'm just curious
Nope! If that were true, Earth would basically of had to Speedrun constant atmosphere changes, and the creation and extinction of species. I mean, your trying to tell me dinosaurs must of only lived for a few seconds at most. How is that even possible?
@@Randy58-zn4ez lol aww pickn on Christian's? You know that book the Bible said you would do that. Wow huh? Also says you will burn in a place called hell if u don't repent and accept Jesus as you're King. What u think?? Silly huh? Welp no worries right? What's it gunna be like when u finally close them eyes?? "Oh well" u say? Or "Goodbye" at least? U live by the rule of law not by the rule of a GOD. So don't think about it too hard.. right? Cuz it don't matter......? Or does it..... U decide
If you never seen a fossal in one thousand years you won’t see a fossal found one million years ago it would already be decay and rotten FYI I have my bachelors degree in science and I’m a teacher.
search on google ) ? It is a good one of a kind guide for discovering your mayan day sign and the clues it has to your future without the hard work. Ive heard some awesome things about it and my m8 got amazing results with it.
Why do the bible say , ye are gods not God but gods then you must look to the ancient india text and then ask why do they have so many gods.........Then you must ask yourself about the cicle of life and look at all things that have evolved and florished within the billions of years....If adam was his greatest creation what was before Adam?????Angels???????
The Bible says God created the heavens and the earth... THEN it says there was light created. There can be billions of years between, there had to be a certain amount of time if there were angels and 1/3 of them fell from heaven with Satan. You CAN say the earth is billions of years old and HUMANITY can only be 6k years old as well.
Well the bible is wrong. Here you go. 1 - Light 2 - Space 3 - Stars 4 - Water 5 - Sun 6 - Earth 7 - Dry land 8 - Oceans 9 - Life 10 - Death 11 - Fish 12 - Trees 13 - Land reptiles 14 - Aquatic reptiles and flying reptiles, all from land reptiles 15 - Land mammals, from land reptiles 16 - Birds, from land reptiles 17 - Bats and whales, from land mammals 18 - A population of ape-like creatures evolved into population of humans
Thats what i always tell myself i like watching these type of videos on space and etc but i dont believe majority of it at all how can people say certain things is billions of years old how can they say the age on anything like planets or universe... I have a hard time believing dinosaurs is real also because it was beyond our time to know altho there are bones of them i still dont believe cause it can be made... Fun fact how does people know the color and how the eyes of a dinosaur really is when they make movie or draw it? Again everything they tell us is just not believable for me atleast
Adam is 4 billion years old according to scientist....if God made the earth 4 billion years ago and made Adam on the sixth day it means Adams desendents have been on earth for 4 billion years.......meaning every race came from Adam how old is the bible be it oral tradition????
If the earth is 4.5 billion years old, don't you think those volcanos would have cooled down a little more than they are?? That molten rock would be as cool as a cucumber by now.
Radio active elements give off a huge amount of energy in the form of heat that’s what keeps the centre of the earth hot if not for that then you’d be right
core of the earth: really hot why really hot? because its keeping the heat from when the planet formed (which was a huge event that involved lots of massive objects) volcano: reaches down really far (really deep inside the earth) the lava stays liquid as its stored underground (its hot down there) volcano: erupts (when it leaves the ground it cools down slowly)
On more thing unless the material in the universe had been produced outside the universe then all material would be of the same age in all of the universe if it was made at the same time. There would be forces and effects that may look like the elements have aged more because of the breakdown processes. Men have assumed many things throughout our history and time is one of them it is a physical property proved by Einstein relative to the beholder.
@@allthingsgood8265 do you have a better theory... age dating is riddled in inconsistency. Close aging is rounding to millions of years. I can get closer looking at something and putting a date on it..
@Jason Shearin that would be flawed logic. I was leaning more to we can't accurately date the planet or layers of dirt and rock based on the assumption of uniformity. Too many missing pieces in history that we could not actually observe. Even star formation theory is changing. Check out Setterfield on gsr updates with our plasma universe.
@Jason Shearin what i gave you is a link into the research of one of the leading scientists in our century.. Your ignorant remark has been formed from propaganda aimed at the common people to obscure reality and truth. I agree the earth is a globe. The physics and observations hold this to be a relative fact. Time or age of the universe has not been worked out in sense of true observation. Theories with many holes are the common of this day. You need to look at all possible theories before you can make a sweeping statement like that. Get more educated smalls.
I think the Earth isn't as old as science claims.
If the world is some 4.55billion years old, I'm sure things like Technology and the rest would have been more advanced than they currently are right now.
The world is young, I was born in 1991, and I can see in just my 31 years of living, things have changed drastically.
Just look back at Cars in 1991, Houses, technology, education, etc, and compare that with today and notice how the world has changed so fast, this is to prove how new the world as a whole is.
I believe this earth is no more than 6000 years old.
Modern humans have only existed for no more than 300,000 years, literally modern cognition, the ability to think like we do now only came about 40k years ago
Noah's flood destroyed the world and all the technology that came before it.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Not just that but if caveman were around over 2 million years ago meaning idk how it took that long for there to be 8 billion people
@@Daddychill945Things like Ice ages, and just being dumber back then prob did a number on our population
Production value going up. Nice!
Pp
Saturday, October 22nd 4004 B.C. at 6 P.M. LMAO!
Chris Rohrback you think that’s funny?? I can see that; bu the wild guesses in the rest of the video and what’s commonly accepted today aren’t actually much better. Most scientists are only parroting what they’ve been taught in school and really have very little idea what they’re talking about.
Chris Rohrback 🤣🤣🤣 like what?? How could you possibly know that
@@redd-iveee4400 It was said in the video.
Not nearly as funny as "The Universe is 13 billion years old" (YEARS old. YEARS.. hmm isnt a year how long the earth freaking goes around the sun??) use your brain man.
ya its total bullshit ikr, LMFAO !!!!!
Interesting stuff. Please work on the background music - too loud.
6,000 = 6,000,000,000 BAM! Done! We can all go home now.
The earth is 4,800,000,000
Look up the video by Dr. Hiam Schore on the correlation of time with a linear graph.
Funny how there is a video with a guy asking citizens of the USA and Canada on how old is our planet or something like that... and most answers were like 2019 years old or 3000 years old :D
Slow claps to all those who still believe that the Earth is only 6000 years old 😁😁😁
Hahahaha indian Christians are steel believing it 😂😂😂😂
And you’re stupid for believing this crap
@@KrishnaKrishna-xu7vy hahaha already scientists started decreasing the earth years from billions to thousands
(Theories can be replaced by another theory or cancelled.)
Just check young earth theory.
@@nikhithap6561 they havent.
@@paulgilhuis1 the mt St Helens lava was deliberately dated by creationist shills using methods that they knew would give incorrect results.
This video was well-made. Nice.
Also, rocks from my St. Helens were dated using the same techniques used to date other rocks and 5 different ages ranging from thousands to millions.
2:50 Rock layers. After the Mt St Helens explosion, we now have observed the fast formation of rock layers. Which for those who base their conclusion on real, observable science, know that the proposed age of rock layers by theoretical earth scientists, is incorrect.
You are an idiot, listening to too many other idiots, like this video. All of what you stated is a lie
Ikr its wrong where does the dirt come from? More and more layers where does the dirt come from
Science Confirms a Young Earth-The Radioactive Dating Methods are Flawed
ua-cam.com/video/3AomTKRLB_4/v-deo.html
@@paulgilhuis1 Fact: you are referring to Steve Austin's work on Mount Saint Helens.
Fact: you can use the internet to learn why he is wrong.
WOW that was BRILLIANT. Many thanks 😊
Winner of a video, been searching for "cosmic calendar astrology.com" for a while now, and I think this has helped. Have you heard people talk about - Bannrial Bizarre Bulldozer - (do a search on google ) ? It is a smashing one off guide for discovering your mayan day sign and the clues it has to your future without the hard work. Ive heard some decent things about it and my colleague got cool results with it.
@@novaknovakovic1585 This is a "magic-free" comment section
@@mattphillips6706 That's funny !!! Good 1
I’m a Christian and believe in the Bible but I believe that the universe is 14 billion years old and the earth is 4.54 billion years old
6 minutes into the video you state that Thomson predicted the age to be 20-40 million years old, but the presentation says 20-400 million years
Ugh, 400 is just a typo! Thanks for catching it!
Pretty sure the earth is 4.5 billion years old according to biology statements but correct me
Sir pls add a video about rocks and show the difference types of rocks which ha easy to identify and the special property with use
Check out my other vids! Lots of rock and mineral content.
ua-cam.com/video/ZkHp_nnU9DY/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/aCnAF1Opt8M/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/Etu9BWbuDlY/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/1oQ1J0w3x0o/v-deo.html
A 1992 radioisotope dating research was conducted by Dr Austin on some Mt. St. Helens rock specimens. It failed to date the 10-year old rock accurately/precisely.
That’s because the sample was so young that it didn’t have any daughter material in it, those dating methods need both parent and daughter material so they can measure the ratio between them so the test would have given incorrect results because it was used incorrectly.
They age the fossils by layer it’s found in. They date the layers in the geologic column by the fossils. When the date doesn’t fit their preconceived notion’s of its age they throw it out . Those sneaky creationists have sent in rocks of known dates and ridiculous dates back . Roraima plateau in Guyana is supposed to be the oldest in the world. Billions of years old. In 1969 they broke rocks open and found pollen . The geologist said “ this is a serious problem “. They have never returned to do the follow up studies they said were needed . A lot of hard evidence says these dates are wrong . Robert Gentry did a great study published way back in 1976 showing these rocks formed quickly using polonium halo’s which form very quickly . Look him up
You wouldn't use a diamond to test the softness of toilet tissue nor would you use U-Pb or K-Ar (they have VERY long half lives) to date volcanic material that was erupted from a recent volcano.
Contamination by various means, including older accidental material caught up in a young magma generating event can explain much of this "error".
Strangely, C14 dating would likely prove more accurate, where you would date organic material (for example, trees) charred and killed by the eruption and incorporated into tuff units.
C14, no doubt, has been tested THOUSANDS of times on trees that can be independently checked by tree rings.
One isotope pair, similarly, is tested against another.
Trust if it makes sense but verify. That's good advice in science as well as day to day living.
By similar reasoning, do we trust Joe in his claims that he is honest, or wonder where all the millions and the mansions have come from, when his average salary over the years was in the low six figures?
How are the Clintons, the Bushes, the Bidens, Nancy, and the BLM tomatoes worth 10's or hundreds of $millions?
Praise the Lord for their delivery over poverty!!!????
Doctor Steve WANTS to prove a 6000 year old earth. I would never consider him impartial.
In Alquran too hasbeen explained how earth was born and not only in bible
@jayvir jadeja wtf bro
tHank you for this.
How Old is the earth?ua-cam.com/video/5iX7cLq0OdE/v-deo.html.)k
Very nice video but the world is actually 5782 Years old
Nope! That's impossible, lol. Dinosaurs existed way before us. Before the dinosaurs, there was bacteria. They all needed time to evolve, and the Earth needed time to get less oxygenated.
Lol, They all needed time to evolve! They who? Bacteria evolving into dinosaurs and monkeys to humans ? 😅
how did you get such estimate 5782 Years old?
Our history is 12000 years old
What's a knowledgeable video
10:56 that is seemingly Coruscant, not the earth
9:28 meteorites floating over a mirrored italian peninsula
I know those just want to be aesthetic but want to point out where those pics might come from
Star wars fan
Me too
I'm so old, when I went to school, they didn't have history , oooohhh !!
This comment basically depicts you to be around the age of five, so no.
@@turtlez2776 lmao
@5:50 ... Did anyone else notice this mistake. Was it 20 - 400 million or 20 - 40 million according to William Thomson?
The correct number is 40.
it is so nice thanks
Dear Burda, I tell You a scientific method which scientists actually used to determine the age of at least the nearby galaxial surroundings... and even farther.
1)
First of all, in our solar system we measured the speed of light... it's about 300,000 km/sec - and the most interesting it is constant in time and space as well (see Michaleson-Morley experiment and its consequences).
2)
Now, we have seen also the nearby stars' parallax by which we can determine their distance in kilometers or better to convert to AU (astronomical unit).
3)
Among these stars we have seen many regular stars with a given spectral and thermodynamical characteristics - we found that the same charactreristics belong to the very similar stars with very similar brightness as well... Purely evidental! :)
4)
After that we looked for the other stars which are shining much more distantly and used the well tested inverse square law for the brightness - by which we can precisely calculate many other stars' distance as well... And here comes the point just to overpass that biblical 6000 years of OUR galaxy at the first place - because there are lot of distant stars from where the LIGHT itself needs more than 10,000 years to travel to reach us, but we CAN observe them today (some even with our naked eyes, just we didn't know till yet how distant they are in real), so those parts of the universe in our galaxy clearly must be OLDER than that...
5)
This so called "cosmological chain" which is based in pure EVIDENCE is not yet over! As we can measure also supernovea even much more farther then these already known stars, so here comes the hundreds of millions year regarding that part of the existing universe... which means: the whole is far more older than Bible says!
6)
What even more: the most distant galaxies measured by their IA type of supernovea comes to the age of our so called "visible universe" (visible here means detectable), and that stays between 10-12 billion years depending how far we can follow this chain with a scientifically acceptable accuracy...
7)
Farther we cannot see - and no one knows what is beyond that "formal boundary", which is enormously far from us about 13.8 billion light years away... ("1 light year" is the distance which light travels in one year - it is about 9460.5 billion kilometers).
So maybe, maybe "there" is some kind of "God" residing somewhere out there - NO ONE KNOWS - and no one is able to falsify this possibility... BUT, that is pure evidance today that the whole universe is more than 13 (nearly 14) billion years old.
This is what cannot be denied !!! Or people who do that will fall in that kind of group which I deeply feel is not necessary at all (to call some our brothers and sisters "sheep". :( ... But since 2x2=4 then our universe is so old as it turned out to be the case, and even if not all the writers of Bible or any other religious book writers was aware of it, that is the case !!! :)
Science will NEVER "kill" "God", as You can saw above: there is and will be always some "place" for "God", and that truly will remain so forever till the end of the universe itself - but if science tells us something so clearly, then it really needs some kind of "blindness" to reject all the evindences which are laudly but gently speaking to all of us - and without science we would be dead - just think for the smallpox or plague which was horrible deadly disease not so long time ago...
Slowly but surely, humanity can grow up, and as it happens whith Santa Claus, all of those our previous misunderstandings can be placed in an eternal valued shelf in our beloved memories...
Whith respect!
(a scientist, who are not willing to eliminate our historical tradition,
because in some way it is also a "fact" whithin the history itself...)
PEACE
DAMN
Tibor Banjai A believe in a god is simply ignorant primitive superstition and nothing more.
Randal Bystry Although I'm a non-believer scientist, I think I can tell this in the name of many of those scientists who are willing to value the way itself how we evolved in a complex way, especially regarding how we though about the existance and universe, and top of that, about ourselves... Of course, a lot of those things are literally not true in which most of believers do believe even today - but this is also a fact that we started with the "flat Earth", and now just look at it where we stand... on the Moon and maybe within a century beyond... This is our journey all together, with many-many mistakes, and that somehow makes to this progress a kind of sense: it is a mirror of the past, just to look in it and to see where to go foreward. ;)
Obviously, that is a different story: how to evolve even religions... This is really hard (almost impossible), because all of the believers are thinking in a way that so called "trueth" already has been revealed whith a maximal perfection - but this is not more just another "falt Earth". A prominent matematician (also philosopher) Kurt Gödel clearly found a rigorous theorem about this almost a cetury ago, that THERE IS NO PERFECTION, WHAT SO EVER, REGADING "KNOWING ALL" - of course this is valid even in the realm of "Gods". This fact (theorem) is absolutely having the similar magnitude, like "Sun is much bigger, and Earth practically revolves around Sun, so not the opposite is the case". This required paradigm-shift... But look at it again: everybody ignored Gödel's theorems for so many decades... just because those undeniable theorems states that even "God" cannot have these perfect properties, such as "omnipotent" and "knowing everything". - Now, think about it: how many more decades (or perhaps centuries) need to pass untill someone realizes that damn, it is not killing the "God", just telling that "every being simply needs to constantly improve his/her actual knowledge". For example: compared to the snails, we hopefully have much more knowledge - but who knows, maybe one day they will take over this planet millions of years after we wanished ourselves... and then: those snails maybe will have similar conversations about their origin - even can comprehend our Gödel's theorems again... :)
This is why it is better to keep in mind "where we started" with all the mistakes, in order to avoid those thoughts that we "finished" every learnings, every discoveries, and this is why also important to improve somehow the old dogmatic religions to not make the same mistakes again and again... If we would complettely erase them, then this germ would start to grow again from the very begining. Wiser to manage to improve, not to erase it!
I will never belive in any "Gods", those tales are (on today's level) really like Santa Claus - and in some sense that is also a nice thing, but seeing an adult having about 30-40 years and still believing in this tale, this is what frightening me, this is really bad, there must be some "near-scientific" view, at least... which is not killing the past, but having future as well! :)
f you studied enough, you will realize that all of his examples were based upon the wrong assumptions which are false.
1). False assumption - that the earth was created extremely hot which would result in a much different earth today that we observe....with plenty of water for one.
2) That all radio-active 'dates' agree. They do not, they differ widely.
Just because we do not know how God created does not mean that He did not do the creating. God does not rely upon our knowledge in order to create.
@@danminer5343 LoOoL
God is INSIDE you, not creating you, but consist of!
The only one really BIG false assumption is that God somehow residing above this world and governing it... as it would be true, just look around in the crazy world how He is doing it taking lives - and oh, yes, You will explain even children's death by letting in the game the so called Evil...
Leave these ''guys'' and let you study the pure LOVE as Buddha did... :)
PEACE to all of us !!!
One more thing meteorites could have originated from the Earth and were shot out from the crust into outer space to this is also looked at in Walt Brown hydro plate theory book it places them in near Earth orbit and they come back once in a while and are caught by our gravitational pull.
@The Best Danica Barnaba sorry didn't understand...
@The Best Danica Barnaba Cool read the book by Walt Brown and you will have a good understanding of what was going on there. It's free online if you don't want to buy it...
Im going with team 6,000 🙌
Awesome video you got a sub
We have only been around for 6000 years or so.
How old is the star of David ?????For any scientist that do not believe humans been on earth for 4 billion years
From millions to billions to trillions years
4.543E9 of years
2022 years old bruh
Bruh…
First understand your self to 100% then you will understand this universe
If anybody is interested Barry Setterfields theory of everything is very interesting check out his work.
Hinduism says that earth is 4320000000 year old which is equal to 1 kalp of bharman mean universe
Fuck Hinduism
Slow claps to all those who still believe that the Earth is only 6000 years old 😁😁😁😂😂😂
The symbols floating around the screen at 7:02 are the biological hazard symbol, not the three-bladed fan style radiation warning symbol that was probably intended. Just tossing it out there as something I caught.
It does not take away from the fact that this is an excellent video. Well done!
Earth age is 4.543 billion years
I thought I was 100M or 1M years old I thought 1B but I thinked that not possible
Si God Ang makaka pagsabi kung ilang taon na Ang ating daigdig. Walang sinumang TAO Ang makakapag Sabi na kung Anong eksaktong petsa o Araw kung Anong taon ginawa ni god Ang mundo. DAHIL si GOD Ang nagiisang gumawa ng lahat ng planeta at Mga bituin sa universe.
I just watched the above clip. They are correct, earth is about 4.5 billion years old. Gods sons crusificition on earth was a little over 1 billion years ago. We know that is took God-Lucifer 6 billion years to create Meri's soul, and all creation was formed around Meri, so we know that earth would be less than 6 billion. Great work on behalf of the scientists.
God says around can be confusing. All creation was inner-woven into Meri.
I just watched the clip, where they say that Aristotle was on earth 2000 years ago. That is not correct. Aristotles soul match spouse was on earth around twelve thousand years ago, but prior to this life, Aristotle only came to earth once at intial creation which was almost 1 billion years ago. Aristotle was on earth after Gods son was crusified when God allowed living beings on earth again. Then this life was Aristotles second life on earth, He was the Artist formely known as Prince.. That way you can easily find him when you get to Isadore. Aristotle is part of my working crew, he has traveled much universally.
Aristotle did not have any legacy on earth, other than his artist time, as the artist formely known as prince. it would be interesting to see who they are crediting with Aristotles work. Or even more so, who the being really was that was mistaken for Aristotle.
After Arsitotles life on earth, he went into the lifting to the light as all beings on the side of the good do. I invited him to join my working crew in Isadore, which he greatfully accepted as he could have residency in Isadore and still travel universally.
Just remember my friends, Earth is old.
ATHEIST ASKED ME: How old is the Universe (Earth)? (And I will add what about 6 days of creation?)
LET ME ANSWER YOUR QUESTION USING EINSTEIN and TIME DILATION. Please watch the very short Carl Sagan video clip below for context
From Carl Sagan’s show the cosmos: ua-cam.com/video/83FDv0-USq8/v-deo.html In this video, Carl Sagan talks about two different types of time. Ship Time at the speed of light, and Earth time. The most important comparison in the video, is when Carl Sagan talks about the Ship Time to circumnavigate the entire Known universe (56 years for the Space Ship Traveler) and the amount of “Earth time” that would have passed for those left behind (Carl Sagan says, “they would [BE] 10s of Billions of Years in the Far Far Future” Earth Time). In fact, Earth would have been destroyed by our sun going Super Nova before we return, BUT for the sake of argument, we imagine again, that the Earth is still here.
Now what is the conversation we would have, with those people on the Earth? We would exclaim-it is I, the space traveler, one of your ancestors, and only 56 years have passed since I left Earth. Of course, the people on the Earth would claim I was insane. According to our history, that space flight took place Billions and Billions of years ago, and there is no way you are the astronaut that left Earth so long ago.
Question: Which group is telling the truth about the passage of time?
Answer-Both of them
Now the best part, what in the world does this have to do with the Bible, time dilation, and sheep herders in the Land of Israel 2400 years ago during the time of King David, and 2000 years ago with the Apostle Peter? Lets start with:
2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.
It is very important to find out what Peter means by this statement, but first I want to concentrate on how Peter could possibly have come up with this statement. As Christians, we of course believe in divine revelation though the holy spirit is one possible way-but my Atheist friends are already groaning. The other possible way, is the Old Testament. In fact, Psalm 90:4 adds a critical component to what Peter wrote. Here is the verse:
A thousand years in your sight
are like a day that has just gone by,
or like a watch in the night.
So the first part of the Psalm, basically mirrors what Peter wrote, but the last part of the verse is key: “or like a watch in the night.” So what is a watch in the night-3 hours of time. There were 4 watches each night, for a total of 12 hours. WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN? For God, time is relative. If God chooses-he can spend 1000 of his years, in a space of only 3 hours of Earth Time. Or, if God chooses-he can spend a 1000 of his years in one day of Earth Time. Or (since this is a principle and not a dogmatic rule) if God chooses-he can spend a 1000 of his years in only 3 seconds of Earth time.
Conversely, two thousand years can pass here on Earth, but for God, only 48 hours could have past, or 6 hours, or 6 seconds. The truly amazing thing is, until Albert Einstein elucidated his Theory of Special Relativity, ideas like these were relegated to science fiction. Today, this is scientifically possible in this universe.
Now, think about the 6 days of creation, spoken about in the Book of Genesis. From who’s perspective, are these days given? Since man is not created until the 6th day-and the Bible says we are still in the 7th day, they must be from God’s perspective. Therefore, if time is relative for God, he can “live” 1,000, or 10,000 or 100,000 or 1 Billion years in one 24 hour Earth day. And, again, conversely, a 24 hour period of time could pass for God, yet a billion years could pass on Earth. Since this IS A SCIENTIFIC possibility, and not simply speculation, this can go a long way to reconcile the young Earth, old Earth debate.
@anonymous 67 Well that would apparently be a wrong statement, since plenty of people have read what I wrote. The Carl Sagan video attached to my post has hundreds of views by now. Thank God Have a blessed day.
@anonymous 67 Dinosaurs hey? You mean like the Notasaur secular scientists talk about today in this modern secular science video clip? ua-cam.com/video/Cj93zE2c83w/v-deo.html
OR in this article about a supposed 65 million year old T-Rex. WHAT NONSENSE
FOR 300 YEARS ACCORDING TO MARY SWEITZER IN THE ARTICLE BELOW, THEY TAUGHT BY SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTATION, THAT ALL BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS WOULD BE GONE WITHIN ONE MILLION YEARS PERIOD. SO I AGAIN SAY WHAT NONSENSE TO say that the Notasaur could preserve MOST OF ITS SKIN AND GUT CONTENTES FOR 110 MILLION YEARS.
ARTICLE
Controversial T. Rex Soft Tissue Find Finally Explained
By Stephanie Pappas, Senior Writer | November 26, 2013 07:01pm ET
The controversial discovery of 68-million-year-old soft tissue from the bones of a Tyrannosaurus rex finally has a physical explanation. According to new research, iron in the dinosaur's body preserved the tissue before it could decay.
The research, headed by Mary Schweitzer, a molecular paleontologist at North Carolina State University, explains how proteins - and possibly even DNA - can survive millennia. Schweitzer and her colleagues first raised this question in 2005, when they found the seemingly impossible: soft tissue preserved inside the leg of an adolescent Trex unearthed in Montana.
"What we found was unusual, because it was still soft and still transparent and still flexible," Schweitzer told LiveScience.
The obvious question, though, was how soft, pliable tissue could survive for millions of years. In a new study published today (Nov. 26) in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Schweitzer thinks she has the answer: Iron.
Iron lady
Iron is an element present in abundance in the body, particularly in the blood, where it is part of the protein that carries oxygen from the lungs to the tissues. Iron is also highly reactive with other molecules, so the body keeps it locked up tight, bound to molecules that prevent it from wreaking havoc on the tissues.
After death, though, iron is let free from its cage. It forms minuscule iron nanoparticles and also generates free radicals, which are highly reactive molecules thought to be involved in aging.
"The free radicals cause proteins and cell membranes to tie in knots," Schweitzer said. "They basically act like formaldehyde."
OCCUMS RAZOR: The simplest explanation tends to be the correct one.
So according to the article-for 300 years-science taught that fossils, which have to be millions of years old, could not and would not have any biological materials left. According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, all fossils are “rocks,” even the bone materials are gone.
However, now today Evolutionists know differently but they keep sticking to their millions of years MANTRA story.
The History of dinosaur artifacts like cave paintings and pottery, proves beyond a reasonable doubt, that men living even a few thousand years ago must have “put their eyes” on these creatures.
Furthermore, FREE RADICALS, antioxidents and mary Schweitzer’S THEORY WHERE IS THE LOGIC?
Free Radicals Medical Definition:
an especially reactive atom or group of atoms that has one or more unpaired electrons; especially : one that is produced in the body by natural biological processes or introduced from outside (as in tobacco smoke, toxins, or pollutants) and that can damage cells, proteins, and DNA by altering their chemical structure.
Anti-Oxidents Definition:
a substance that inhibits oxidation, especially one used to counteract the deterioration of stored food products.
a substance such as vitamin C or E that removes potentially damaging oxidizing agents in a living organism.
So the Article claims that iron in the blood can preserve the tissues like a type of formaldehyde
Now I have to break one of my rules not to use evidence from a Creationist Scientist because no one else dare talk about it. The man in the video is Mark Armitage
Lets Watch the Video ua-cam.com/video/iN04I8HuFGw/v-deo.html
Why was Mark Armitage fired?
Do “evolutionists” seem to care about following the evidence where it leads?
Do “scientists” in general have a bias?
What is wrong with Mary Schweitzer’s theory of “Free Radical Iron” acting like a tissue preservative?
ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM VIDEOS
studio.ua-cam.com/users/videouZ0Fg2Jju0Y/edit
studio.ua-cam.com/users/videoLd_3cCjM0SU/edit
Why won’t scientists allow a Carbon 14 test to be done?
Why-is the previous “science belief” of 1 Million Years max for biological materials thrown out-instead of realizing that perhaps the Dinosaurs in question are NOT older than 1 Million Years?
What happens to Scientists that don’t toe the Evolutionary Fairy Tale?
A GOOD HELPING OF EVOLUTIONARY BIAS ANYONE.
THIS IS WHY I WILL NEVER BELIEVE IN EVOLUTION-EVERYTHING-EVEN SCIENCE IS PC.
With all these theories to rock dating, how come none of them have actually created a rock, waited some 10+ years, and tested it (by someone else) to be correct. All they do is credit people, and yet none of them have actually been there to test it. Does anyone else see something wrong with this?
Yes I see that you have no concept of isotope dating.
@@publiozinj4882 u didn’t answer the question though
@@Mikey-jf3nx what kind of rock are you referring too, as different kinds of rock are created in different ways
Actually, using Pb 210 (half-life 22.2 years) we date sedimentation rates in estuaries. So, yeah we do that already.
The Earth had no beginning and will have no end? Hard to grasp, but if memory serves, that be the case. Even as suns die it is hard to get this one.
Hindu ancient Texts Vedas, states Universe is 4.32 billion years old .... how close to modern theory
Very interesting but the exact time is not clearly known to humans
What months days and years that earth totally born?
The challenge is that even the measure of time is different from each period of time...i.e a day in the bible is 1000years
As far as im concern is that Bible doesn't say about the age of the earth but it is humans who tries to calculate using Bible !!! God leaves manythings for humans to explore inorder for us humans to have excited lifes and to let us mismarized by its Creation!!! And to those who says wre are the dinosaurs in the Bible, i will like to says that Bible is not an anthropology textbook ,. There are many animals which are not mention in the Bible except sheep,lion,camels,dove etc so dont say wre is dinosaurs coz the word dinosaur is an English term, it may be mentioned by different term like bohemod ,laviathan and so on
no one but god himself knows how old earth is
4.4b year
God always explain that to Isadores residents. You are apart of Meri as creation was inner-woven into her. which is probably another good reason to end sufferage.
The entire earth is the same age. The idea that different layers of the earth are different ages is rediculous. Thats like saying diferent aspects of a living human are different ages. The entire human was born on the same day.
In your opinion. How come science and all evidence we find disagree with you?
The mater is the same age but not the layers which forms at different times they’re measuring the time that the rocks cooled down and became solid.
But that’s completely different to humans because although I may be 32 years old none of the cells in my body would be that old as they would have been replaced by new cells by now.
The entire earth is not at all the same age. The earth formed by gravity over millions of years. While a human have a day of birth, the whole human body is not the same age. Cells die and new cells are formed. How come you do not know this? Are there other things you do not know? What shape is the earth? What are planets? Do space even exist?
@@jaymz1999 the hydrogen/ helium atoms are 13.6 billion years old. The other atoms are younger having been formed in various stars of different ages since. Every time a giant star dies and goes super nova, more heavy elements are created. Most of the material in our solar system is basically the same age, of course new atoms created by radioactive decay vary, such as a lead atom created by the decay of uranium. Nun the less all the actual protons and nutrons originally created were made in the big bang, and were hydrogen an helium.
Nice 👌👍
earth is made on my bday
3 years old how this even on UA-cam ☠️
Oh wow
6000 years old
Would next year be 6001 years old?
There's ice rings in the arctic dating to more than 10 times that.
We have found fossils that are older than that, you need seriously a brain transplant if you think it is 6000 😐
My teacher sent this to all the class and told them to make note😂😂
Nobody knows the age of the earth...
True no one ever will either great comment.👍👍
wow earth is super old
The "Accretion Disc Theory" for the solar systems formation is now itself History, thanks to the recent discoveries of the many exo-planet solar systems around nearby stars, which reveal our solar system is very peculiar. This alone has caused a reappraisal of the solar system and a realisation that Earth, Mars, Saturn & its moons all have a similar tilt to their axis which implies they could not have formed at the same time as most of the rest of the solar system and are in fact a group of planets that must have been drawn into this solar system as one group some time in the solar systems History by our current huge Suns gravitational pull. Worse Uranus also exhibits an impossible tilt of almost 90 degrees implying it too has been drawn in some time in the past. Now that a number of probes have been sent to numerous Comets, it has become apparent that Comets, asteroids and meteorites while behaving in slightly different ways are all in fact chunks of rock that were once part of one or other planet in this solar system. Most likely thrown into space by the cataclysmic chaos that would have occurred when new planets were drawn into this solar system. So the age of Earth and the other planets in this solar system will not have one common age but at least three different ones.
Cosmic Science is starting to change rapidly as a number of new and important discoveries are being made that upset many long held concepts relating to our solar system. Indeed a major row is brewing within the scientific community, as another bombshell has just been delivered not by scientists but by a High-Tech Electrical Engineering company (in July 2019), who have turned Physics itself on its head, by breaking Newton's Law of Gravity !!!
thats is cool
Have you see Mario buildreps videos,?
4.543 billion years
I think the Hindu texts in Sanskrit give a more realistic time scale for the universe and earth, not just six thousand years. The universe is not “created “ out of nothing in the biblical sense. The universe goes through repeated cycles of projection, sustenance and destruction, only to repeat the cycle again.
Fuck Hinduism bullshit
@@AslemTaslem exactly. 👍
4.5 billion of years to create the earth..
well BaseBall started about 160 years ago,so the Earth is about 300 years old.
Bro throwing some serious logic
We will never know how old Earth neither space
after a billion of years -- we got global warming , acid rain and other natural disaster ---
--- is natural disaster common in the past(i mean billion years ago)? before human had knowledge ? ---
i'm just curious
Wait no
Only GOD knows
God doesn’t exist tho
Only 6000
Nope! If that were true, Earth would basically of had to Speedrun constant atmosphere changes, and the creation and extinction of species. I mean, your trying to tell me dinosaurs must of only lived for a few seconds at most. How is that even possible?
We have found fossils that are older than that, you need seriously a brain transplant if you think it is 6000 😐
The earth is 2020 years old😂
hope this is a joke
Pelihuppu no I’m really serious you can tell I’m serious by the laughing emoji
@@NemXui < --- Teenager
Pelihuppu I hope it’s a joke too
Lazy Boss Yh but what age tho???
I highly recommend the video called
Evolution’s Achilles Heel
Religious garbage by a qualified crackpot.
I highly recommend you see a mental health professional.
@@Randy58-zn4ez lol aww pickn on Christian's? You know that book the Bible said you would do that. Wow huh? Also says you will burn in a place called hell if u don't repent and accept Jesus as you're King. What u think?? Silly huh? Welp no worries right? What's it gunna be like when u finally close them eyes?? "Oh well" u say? Or "Goodbye" at least? U live by the rule of law not by the rule of a GOD. So don't think about it too hard.. right? Cuz it don't matter......? Or does it..... U decide
Lazy Boss - oh be quiet you intolerable dumbfuck.
Evaluation is adaptation just a different word FYI
The Bible contradicts itself.
Just doesn’t add up.
Maybe a million years after we're all fossils.
wym
If you never seen a fossal in one thousand years you won’t see a fossal found one million years ago it would already be decay and rotten FYI I have my bachelors degree in science and I’m a teacher.
Earth isn’t one million years old saying it is is foolish FYI
of course human can averagely live 100 years not million years
@@theocdyl7366 less people live to be 100 than not.
It’s 2021 years old
We have a genius here.
That’s not even what the Bible says
Quran has told us about the idea of how old the earth is
I'm torn between science and the Bible. I'm wondering if the age in the Bible was measured in a different time frame then ours
the NW geology Guy the Bible
If u think we came from the Big Bang that’s dumb where would the energy come from? How did an explosion create life lol non life can’t create life
IN the beginning GOD sounds better
@@Documenting_Reality I believe that the so called big bang was really the creation of the Universe
the NW geology Guy ok what caused the Big Bang
Earth is 50 k years old
Saids by who?
that is good for kids
Earth is young, go to space an learn other planet. You dnt know , God knows
How Old is the earth?ua-cam.com/video/5iX7cLq0OdE/v-deo.html.k
Earth is 4.5 billion years old
No
@@Lonnplays Yes
@@zigongosaurus5274 noo
@@Lonnplays Yes, yes it is.
@@zigongosaurus5274 ok flat earthers I'm not believing u
Title: how old is earth.
Me: *THEY DONT HAVE AGES THOUGH THEY ARE FUDGING PLANETS*
Um how do they know?
They don’t know
Nobody talk about the dinosaurs,,,hiw come???
Ummmmm guys you know we live in the new
search on google ) ? It is a good one of a kind guide for discovering your mayan day sign and the clues it has to your future without the hard work. Ive heard some awesome things about it and my m8 got amazing results with it.
@@marbelz.p6018 Google isnt always true
Why do the bible say , ye are gods not God but gods then you must look to the ancient india text and then ask why do they have so many gods.........Then you must ask yourself about the cicle of life and look at all things that have evolved and florished within the billions of years....If adam was his greatest creation what was before Adam?????Angels???????
wow its hella old-
“The Big Bang” BRU God make the earth there is NO such thing as “the Big Bang” 🙄
lmao
You wanna know something interesting? The guy who came up with it was a man of God.
The Bible says God created the heavens and the earth... THEN it says there was light created. There can be billions of years between, there had to be a certain amount of time if there were angels and 1/3 of them fell from heaven with Satan. You CAN say the earth is billions of years old and HUMANITY can only be 6k years old as well.
Well the bible is wrong. Here you go.
1 - Light
2 - Space
3 - Stars
4 - Water
5 - Sun
6 - Earth
7 - Dry land
8 - Oceans
9 - Life
10 - Death
11 - Fish
12 - Trees
13 - Land reptiles
14 - Aquatic reptiles and flying reptiles, all from land reptiles
15 - Land mammals, from land reptiles
16 - Birds, from land reptiles
17 - Bats and whales, from land mammals
18 - A population of ape-like creatures evolved into population of humans
So you believe everything you see and read? Ok
“... how we figured out the age of the planet” the speaker claims, well.. we didn’t, there is not a single scientific proof of that..
Thats what i always tell myself i like watching these type of videos on space and etc but i dont believe majority of it at all how can people say certain things is billions of years old how can they say the age on anything like planets or universe... I have a hard time believing dinosaurs is real also because it was beyond our time to know altho there are bones of them i still dont believe cause it can be made... Fun fact how does people know the color and how the eyes of a dinosaur really is when they make movie or draw it? Again everything they tell us is just not believable for me atleast
@@Violate.. thank you!!!!!!!
In the bible Jesus was really on earth they tell the year when they was on earth
When ever revelation come and Jesus return after the battle god will move the heavens to earth after everything over
Earth and universe is external. It goes through cycle of construction and destruction. No one can prove the age of eternal matter.
I would go with science anyway rather then that bible
Adam is 4 billion years old according to scientist....if God made the earth 4 billion years ago and made Adam on the sixth day it means Adams desendents have been on earth for 4 billion years.......meaning every race came from Adam how old is the bible be it oral tradition????
How long is a day with god? Who said that time with God is the same as that on earth
If the earth is 4.5 billion years old, don't you think those volcanos would have cooled down a little more than they are?? That molten rock would be as cool as a cucumber by now.
.....no
Radio active elements give off a huge amount of energy in the form of heat that’s what keeps the centre of the earth hot if not for that then you’d be right
Jesus fuck this was a stupid comment 🤣
core of the earth: really hot
why really hot? because its keeping the heat from when the planet formed (which was a huge event that involved lots of massive objects)
volcano: reaches down really far (really deep inside the earth)
the lava stays liquid as its stored underground (its hot down there)
volcano: erupts (when it leaves the ground it cools down slowly)
Prediction: 6000 years old
Just kidding
On more thing unless the material in the universe had been produced outside the universe then all material would be of the same age in all of the universe if it was made at the same time. There would be forces and effects that may look like the elements have aged more because of the breakdown processes. Men have assumed many things throughout our history and time is one of them it is a physical property proved by Einstein relative to the beholder.
That is an interesting point
Bullshit
@@allthingsgood8265 do you have a better theory... age dating is riddled in inconsistency. Close aging is rounding to millions of years. I can get closer looking at something and putting a date on it..
@Jason Shearin that would be flawed logic. I was leaning more to we can't accurately date the planet or layers of dirt and rock based on the assumption of uniformity. Too many missing pieces in history that we could not actually observe. Even star formation theory is changing. Check out Setterfield on gsr updates with our plasma universe.
@Jason Shearin what i gave you is a link into the research of one of the leading scientists in our century..
Your ignorant remark has been formed from propaganda aimed at the common people to obscure reality and truth.
I agree the earth is a globe. The physics and observations hold this to be a relative fact.
Time or age of the universe has not been worked out in sense of true observation. Theories with many holes are the common of this day.
You need to look at all possible theories before you can make a sweeping statement like that. Get more educated smalls.
I'm commenting to move the number of comments from 666 to 667. 😄 🤣 😂
4 billion sun 10 trillion
In other words, we don't know
Only God knows but we can do educated gues
2021: UMM AFTER MY YEAR ITS EART GONANA EXPOLDE
2022: NO
2023:NO
2024: NO BUT WE WILK WHEN ITS DAY OF JUDGEMENT
2025:YES
2026;IDK
10000:UMM NO
Moon 1millon