Processing DJI Phantom 4 RTK photos in Agisoft Metashape

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @FPSBELGIUM
    @FPSBELGIUM 2 роки тому

    Hello, which key on the keyboard do you press to switch from one photo to another?

  • @dainel40
    @dainel40 3 роки тому +1

    How do you adjust the altitude to get the proper elevation for the point cloud?

  • @marinomazor.adventures
    @marinomazor.adventures Рік тому

    So although you used RTK model you needed to make GCP? It was not possible to get accurate model without them with just RTK drone?

  • @andrearomanofitaly4115
    @andrearomanofitaly4115 Рік тому

    YOU re the BEST ! Thank you so much

  • @allanjarrettbasi78
    @allanjarrettbasi78 3 роки тому

    I'm using a DJI phantom 4 RTK and it's Base Station. My question is if I'm did my survey WGS84, while processing can I switch to our local datum using AGISOFT Metashape? Thanks

  • @SrkyHN
    @SrkyHN 5 років тому +1

    Is it necessary to set control points with RTK? Do you need to do post processing with rtk?

  • @dahaproject3498
    @dahaproject3498 4 роки тому

    when use GCP (with RTK GPS) with phantom 3 pro, the result is same?

  • @brettjames9088
    @brettjames9088 5 років тому +1

    So you've defined the geoid under custom protection and given it a unique name?

    • @Ljungbergslaboratoriet
      @Ljungbergslaboratoriet  5 років тому

      I'm not sure I understand your question. The geoid is downloaded from Agisoft's website (www.agisoft.com/downloads/geoids/) and copied into the Metashape installation directory. The geoid I'm using (RH2000) is the one used in Sweden with the Sweref99 coordinate system. The geoid is a raster covering the entire area where the coordinate system is defined, for sweref99 it is all of Sweden. In Metashape I don't need to define anything, just copy the file downloaded into the Metashape installation directory and Metashape will use it automatically with the right geoid (RH2000 in my case) if it has the same name as when you downloaded the file. I hope this answered your question?

  • @muzo583
    @muzo583 5 років тому +1

    You did not optimize camera calibration thus you have 30 cm error on height values. Or you can use field camera calibrations as known pre calibrated camera parameters.

  • @ZED-PV
    @ZED-PV 5 років тому +3

    How many GCPs do you use per 10 HA let's say?
    How has your result been with just RTK geotags on the photos and no GCPs?
    I'm a bit confused how Metashape will accurately judge the true height of ground level with just RTK geotags.