If you look *Chin Lakes* on _Google Earth_ where they filmed the cornfield chase, and then time travel back in the historical imagery to 2015 you can see the skid marks from the film truck and Coopers truck on the edge of the cliff. The image was taken August of 2015. There are remnants of the filming all over those hills from the crews setting up for shots and moving equipment. All erased with time now. You can still, just faintly see the marks on the edge of the cliff next to the reservoir 10 years later. I wish somebody could go out there and look at it up close.
The planets had relative time because of the black hole, if they spent too much time they would’ve let humanity die. Not to mention stated multiple time in the movie they were running out of fuel.
That's corn. Nolan's production grew and sold corn. It's quite obviously corn, not wheat. It looks nothing like wheat. It looks exactly like corn...because it is. It's corn.
So is there some school somewhere teaching all creators to use the same type of irrelevant and stock footage timed for every other word as if you’re afraid we might turn away for a second if you don’t keep slapping us in the face with unnecessary visuals? You’re like carbon copies of each other. There’s nothing unique here, and this gets old and tiring after a while.
That was my initial take too until I read (known as corn in North America and Australia; wheat is often called corn in countries including Britain). British people, like this videomaker like to be quirky.
There's a very confusing clip when discussing tidal waves. TIDAL waves are due to the moon and sun and are very predictable. The actual calculations can be nasty (and a fascinating introduction to ANALOG computers that predated digital computers by a century(?)) but they've very predictable given a handful of values specific to a location. Those bidaily tides can result in a large change in water level (see Nova Scotia (?) and Anchorage) and weird things like soliton waves on British canals. All are predicable and, as stated, ultimately due to the earth rotating under a relatively stable bulge in the oceans water. In contrast the clip showed a TSUNAMI. These are not predictable because they're caused by things that cant be predicted. Mostly earthquakes, landslides, and the occasional meteroite strike. In this case the wave does move thorough the water. It's also a very deep wave although that's not seen in the open ocean since it's hidden in the water column. But the water column isn't deep enough as the wave approaches the shore and thats why it climbs to such heights. Thats scary, but what causes the most damage is the deep wave means the water keeps coming in. It can reach far inland. Look at the stories from the Indian Ocean tsunami a decade ago. That said the height can be staggering when its due to a landslide into a fjord or narrow canyon. Trees ripped out to an elevation of 100m+.
They never should have been able to fly that close to a a black hole. Also if a planet was orbiting a black hole it's just a matter of time before it to get sucked in.
I would if put interstellar as number 1, greatest film of all time. Recently saw it in i-max when it returned to theatres for 10th anniversary, it was phenomenal, makes me sad that I won’t get to experience it like that again
While the black hole was technically accurate, Gargantua was not. A black hole with the mass of a 100 million suns would have an event horizon that would be larger than the orbit of Mars around the sun. There's no way you could see it in its entirety as you do in the movie, from as close as they are. They're supposed to be near the event horizon (guy falls in) so the black hole would just look like a massive void with occasional plasma or dust flying by. But that wouldn't make for a great cinematic experience.
That Rotten Tomatoes picks of 1-2-3 are hella bad. Interstellar is ok but IMO the story is clunky in parts and some dialogue is corny and Inception is pretty good but I find it overly long so I find the pacing bad. The Dark Knight is not the best the best movie of the last 25 years and not even the best of their top three.
Korn and no way did the money from the korn fund the movie. They used a farmers field. He got paid for them to tear up his field of korn. There is no telling what the movie guys made up for the making of the movie lore. You know lies about how a actor did something that changed the movie or a director that made me do 100 takes because he believed in me. Ego stuff
@@doilysimpkin6972 did you miss in the comments where people are calling this "woke" lol. That's the irony with you people. You just call ANYTHING you don't like "woke". Just stop the crying and complaining sheeessshh 🤣😂
I really like Interstellar a lot but Christopher Nolan is easily the most overrated director of our time. I can't think of a single other director who receives so much fanfare when a movie of his comes out only to routinely have that movie be a steaming cinematic turd that nobody wants to watch twice, with rare exceptions (for me it's The Dark Knight and only because of Heath Ledger's performance and Interstellar). The plots for half of his movies are simply nonsense and gibberish that only exist give him permission to film super expensive and complex practical effects (for which I will give him credit... he's shot some cool looking effects).
Pretty sure it was corn in the movie, not wheat
i do love the hidden details vids (meaning I know more than you know), and then getting the most basic issue in the movie wrong. 😛
Yeah, those are corn stalks. But please continue..
It was corn 🌽 😮😮
Well actually corn is kinda like wheat. It's just really really big wheat. Right?
@@drop830yes. Corn is wheat.
Guess buddy needs to update his list to “10 things you missed and an obvious 11th that only I missed”. It’s corn…corn!!!!
@@keithwilson2103 lolololol, exactly!
If you look *Chin Lakes* on _Google Earth_ where they filmed the cornfield chase, and then time travel back in the historical imagery to 2015 you can see the skid marks from the film truck and Coopers truck on the edge of the cliff. The image was taken August of 2015. There are remnants of the filming all over those hills from the crews setting up for shots and moving equipment. All erased with time now. You can still, just faintly see the marks on the edge of the cliff next to the reservoir 10 years later. I wish somebody could go out there and look at it up close.
13* buddy
CORN… Wheat is a golden yellow.
CORN was talked about in the first part of movie, then at the end.
Holy fuck THANK YOU
Midwesterner came to comment that it's corn, not wheat... old news though.🌽
"Like the wheat in the dustbowl...the CORN is dying." -Prof. Brand
The whole idea that they would not orbit and survey each planet before landing, defies explanation.
😂😂😂
The planets had relative time because of the black hole, if they spent too much time they would’ve let humanity die. Not to mention stated multiple time in the movie they were running out of fuel.
Maybe they did, but just didn’t show it in the movie
@@amandatyler4324yet somehow missed the giant planet wide tidal wave ?
ngl id really like to see Jonathan Nolan's script made into movies
ridiculously *underated* film
That's corn. Nolan's production grew and sold corn. It's quite obviously corn, not wheat. It looks nothing like wheat. It looks exactly like corn...because it is. It's corn.
So is there some school somewhere teaching all creators to use the same type of irrelevant and stock footage timed for every other word as if you’re afraid we might turn away for a second if you don’t keep slapping us in the face with unnecessary visuals? You’re like carbon copies of each other. There’s nothing unique here, and this gets old and tiring after a while.
In a word? Yes.
In more then one word? . . . Yes, the style captures eyeballs and ergo. More money for the creator.
You lost me at “wheat”
Yeah, I couldn't shake it off too 😂
"Wheat" word repeated several times at the beginning was used to trigger farmers' comments around the world.
That was my initial take too until I read (known as corn in North America and Australia; wheat is often called corn in countries including Britain). British people, like this videomaker like to be quirky.
How does anyone confuse corn for wheat?
Breakdown from, it’s a great series and you’ll have fun breaking it down I bet
my brother in christ, this is corn
Wow this looks good. I'll have to stop at 3 minutes and just go watch it lmao. I'll brb
That was an amazing movie. Holy. Him seeing his daughter on her deathbed was so sad 😢
Amazing movie. 10/10
I concur one my favorites for sure
Spielberg should adapt the alternate script into a completely new movie.
Someone who missed the obvious fact that it’s corn and not wheat is here to reveal the mysteries of Interstellar 😂
Anyone else think the prequel comic explanation sounded like a Roadman telling a story. "Man said it was pointless..."
*known as corn in North America and Australia; wheat is often called corn in countries including Britain* -Per google
Huh!? In the UK wheat is called wheat and corn is called corn, the narrator is just mistaken
@@bernismith11 that's what the internet said, consult your brothers to the far east west north and south
If wheat is called corn in the UK, then why did he call the corn wheat?
It's because he made a mistake.
such a good movie
There's a very confusing clip when discussing tidal waves. TIDAL waves are due to the moon and sun and are very predictable. The actual calculations can be nasty (and a fascinating introduction to ANALOG computers that predated digital computers by a century(?)) but they've very predictable given a handful of values specific to a location.
Those bidaily tides can result in a large change in water level (see Nova Scotia (?) and Anchorage) and weird things like soliton waves on British canals. All are predicable and, as stated, ultimately due to the earth rotating under a relatively stable bulge in the oceans water.
In contrast the clip showed a TSUNAMI. These are not predictable because they're caused by things that cant be predicted. Mostly earthquakes, landslides, and the occasional meteroite strike.
In this case the wave does move thorough the water. It's also a very deep wave although that's not seen in the open ocean since it's hidden in the water column. But the water column isn't deep enough as the wave approaches the shore and thats why it climbs to such heights. Thats scary, but what causes the most damage is the deep wave means the water keeps coming in. It can reach far inland. Look at the stories from the Indian Ocean tsunami a decade ago.
That said the height can be staggering when its due to a landslide into a fjord or narrow canyon. Trees ripped out to an elevation of 100m+.
I would have liked to see Jonathan Nolan’s screenplay used
What’s with the random manga toon appearing every few minutes?
That seems to be the guy speaking we're hearing, or a depiction of how he perceives himself.
Thats the prequel comic about Manns experience on his planet when he first arrived.
@@albertorverastegui6352 It’s shit.
Denis Villeneuve is now my favorite Director. Like, Nolan, he has an amazing catalog of films. My Top 3 are Villeneuve, Nolan, and Tarantino.
Also most of what they eat has corn in it because that’s all that’s available
that's corn.
They never should have been able to fly that close to a a black hole. Also if a planet was orbiting a black hole it's just a matter of time before it to get sucked in.
Did you make this for 12 year old iphone addicts? I can’t watch it.
Nah. I'ma do it my own way.
it was corn
I would if put interstellar as number 1, greatest film of all time.
Recently saw it in i-max when it returned to theatres for 10th anniversary, it was phenomenal, makes me sad that I won’t get to experience it like that again
While the black hole was technically accurate, Gargantua was not. A black hole with the mass of a 100 million suns would have an event horizon that would be larger than the orbit of Mars around the sun. There's no way you could see it in its entirety as you do in the movie, from as close as they are. They're supposed to be near the event horizon (guy falls in) so the black hole would just look like a massive void with occasional plasma or dust flying by. But that wouldn't make for a great cinematic experience.
You could’ve called corn “maize” instead of wheat. How you made a video getting that wrong is odd to me.
Where is that scene at the 5 minute mark from?
Corn......
I knew all this.
Great movie but the ending was crap coming back in a book shelf.
Isnt it corn they grow?
Sequel and Prequel, not Sequal and Prequal
No they leached the soil of all its nutrients. Which caused the dust bowl.
Should have used electrolytes.
@@elle3325 it’s got what plant crave
They are silca.. based . Not carbon.
This is wheat, I know wheat
Wheat, huh? If you don't know it's corn, what other 'facts' are absolute horseshit?
corn*
How do you mistake CORN for WHEAT? Did you even watch the movie? 🤡
Get the wheat out of my face (Nacho Libre voice)
I love SF movies. And this is probably the most over-rated one ever. Not bad, just over-rated.
I agree.
That Rotten Tomatoes picks of 1-2-3 are hella bad. Interstellar is ok but IMO the story is clunky in parts and some dialogue is corny and Inception is pretty good but I find it overly long so I find the pacing bad. The Dark Knight is not the best the best movie of the last 25 years and not even the best of their top three.
Korn and no way did the money from the korn fund the movie. They used a farmers field. He got paid for them to tear up his field of korn. There is no telling what the movie guys made up for the making of the movie lore. You know lies about how a actor did something that changed the movie or a director that made me do 100 takes because he believed in me. Ego stuff
Korn is a band
@@raeraebadfingers I eat korn, I guess you listen to the korn. Popkorn? 🤡
I would have preferred the ORIGINAL script over what we got😒
Interstellar ripped off event horizon
Probably a rice guy lol
Corn.
Conservatives would call this movie "woke"
No. We call it brilliant. Just enjoy the movie
Nah. It's not particularly woke. It doesn't sacrifice good storytelling at the alter of identity politics.
@@doilysimpkin6972 did you miss in the comments where people are calling this "woke" lol. That's the irony with you people. You just call ANYTHING you don't like "woke". Just stop the crying and complaining sheeessshh 🤣😂
@@theflash10500 You're just pissed that a Conservative debunked your dumb statement.
@@theflash10500”you people” is exactly how liberals talk 🤣
I really like Interstellar a lot but Christopher Nolan is easily the most overrated director of our time. I can't think of a single other director who receives so much fanfare when a movie of his comes out only to routinely have that movie be a steaming cinematic turd that nobody wants to watch twice, with rare exceptions (for me it's The Dark Knight and only because of Heath Ledger's performance and Interstellar). The plots for half of his movies are simply nonsense and gibberish that only exist give him permission to film super expensive and complex practical effects (for which I will give him credit... he's shot some cool looking effects).
Best movie ever . . . . That's subjective. The funniest scene was created by Kevin Smith. ua-cam.com/video/xOkI2CmD2D8/v-deo.htmlsi=hfLPuEwYzg6me5St
Corn...