Things Headland doesn't understand: Star wars Good vs Evil The hero's journey Narrative dissonance Character motivation Basic storytelling Basic human interaction Basic morality I could go on but I'd be here all day.
Stories from the 90s to 2000s had a Shinto mindset. If you're working on a story from around this time and don't have that mindset why are you even writing it? Shinto mindsets: •Starwars •I have no mouth and I must scream •Startrek •Bleach •(Early) Naruto •Akira •Back to the future •Terminator This was the era when people feared that nature(including humans) would be replaced since technology was advancing so quickly. If you don't have a Shinto mindset don't touch a Shinto story. This is like a non christian creating Christian media.... actually scratch that. Zelda and angels egg are technically created by people who lost faith in said religion but they at least they were religious at some point.
So Anakin Skywalker got groomed and manipulated by Emperor Palpatine into betraying the Jedi and going to the Dark Side. As Darth Vader, he brought about galactic genocide, slaughtered children, choked the woman he loved into unconsciousness when she tried to stop him, he turned against his best friend, he lost his limbs, he got burned alive by lava and left on a hellish planet to rot away like burning trash, only to be rescued by the very man that used him, and was forced to be on life-support inside a black armor suit for the rest of his existence. He blew up entire planets full of innocent people, killed the rebels in charge of stealing the plans for the Death Star, continued killing dozens of people, Force-strangled one of his own henchmen, killed his former best friend in front of his own son Luke, sliced off said son's hand and revealed seconds later that he was his father, and continued doing the Empire's dirty work until Luke convinced him to go back to the side of good. When Palpatine tried to goad Luke into turning to the dark side, all while forcing him watch his own friends die, Luke refused to give in to his negative emotions until Vader provoked him by threatening to go after his sister Leia. Vader was defeated by Luke, but even after everything he had done, Luke STILL refused to kill his own father, prompting Palpatine to try to kill Luke himself only for Vader to redeem himself at the last moments of his life, killing the Emperor even while he was spitting Force lightning out of his fingers, electrocuting himself in the process. Despite Palpatine's manipulations and his horrific actions as Darth Vader, the dude ended up dying as Anakin Skywalker. There is nothing about the tragedy of Anakin Skywalker that is "positive corruption". There is nothing positive about the Dark Side of the Force. It's like calling the One Ring "positive corruption". It's like a drug, addicting and seductive (and not in the sexual way like Headland foolishly misinterpreted it as). It slowly eats away at you and corrupts you, turning you against the people you would normally love, and transforming you physically and mentally into the very worst shell of yourself, and all while lying to you that THAT is your true self and who you're meant to be, and those that are trying to stop you from giving in to the dark side are only hindering you. So to see Leslye Headland glorifying and romanticizing corruption itself is just disturbing. I bet if Osha and Mae had been two brothers, while Smilo Ren had been a woman, it wouldn't be considered a "positive corruption arc" to her, but "toxic masculinity".
👏 👏 👏 👏 What a brilliant comment!! I absolutely agree and couldn't have written this as well as you did. If only Leslye would read comments like these and try to get it through her thick head! 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
Even Kotoe 2 does this with the Sith. We see how the dark side completely eroded the masters, Darth Nihilus is just a hungry entity with no purpose, Darth Sion's body nearly destroyed, held together only cause of his will. Traya was betrayed and her sight taken away from her.
In light of all the criticism the show has received, this is what it really boils down to. Ultimately, this AGAIN is really Disney's doing. The people between Headland and Iger who could have, SHOULD have caught the MANY failings of the show before it cast should all be fired, along with Headland and Iger themselves. $180 freakin' million dollars. Inexcusable.
Yep. Or irony. It's one thing to tell a bad story. It's another thing to undo your own narrative. She really doesn't grasp morality. There's a new batch of young adults just like her. Trying to explain that a neglectful parent is bad, but your hero slaughtering masses for their hurt feelings is literal evil is like screaming at a wall.
This is exactly the problem - she is not even close to a writer. I just finished a first book by a writer who struggled with writing relationships and how to portray them the with the mystery elements. It was more worthy of being turned into a series than this.
@chasehedges6775 Basic story structure. Setup and payoff. Episode 3 introduces the witches chant and episode 7 the vergence which is more important to the story. It's not a twists it's a u-turn.
i mean, hollywood in a nutshell, right? It's not that their disgusting secrets are the problems, it's merely that society at large hasn't learned to accept them yet corruption isn't automatically a bad thing when you think about it, ya' know? Also why hollywood is dying in a nutshell...
@@LoneSilverW0lfthat at least makes sense though as there are many sizes of shrimp, you can tell the difference between a regular shrimp and jumbo shrimp. There is nothing positive about corruption, that is an exclusively negative trait
Being a Jedi is the equivalent of being an adult who is in control of their emotions. That was the whole point of Luke's journey. Disney never understood Star Wars.
And the peak is essentially give up everything to The Force and ascend much like the Air Nomads. Another thing these people do not understand is that the Jedi and the Sith are not inherent to either side. They religions and lifestyles. Literal Yin yang duality of morality.
JRR Tolkien's great quote definitely comes to mind: "Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good."
No wonder these people hate JK Rowling, she epitomized the nature of true evil in the very first Harry Potter she wrote with a single sentence by Voldemort that these "progressives" affirm almost VERBATIM: "There is no good and evil, there is only power, and those too weak to seek it!" They are everything they accuse the world outside of themselves of being; THEY ARE THE BADDIES, they've adorned themselves in an ideological uniform that might just as well have literal "little pictures of skulls on them". The reason why they see villainy and oppression everywhere they look is because that is ALL they believe in, all they see in the mirror and in their dreams, it's all they've got to give some sense of meaning to their lives (a meaning derived purely through negation of everything). Progressivism is nothing more than the praxis of existential nihilism, they are blinded by their faithless resentment and conviction against an existence they cannot justify as being worthy of the suffering intrinsic to the human condition. At the end of the day, it's important to remember the deeper moral of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings: the corruption of the Good by an evil is only a temporary thing, and as the very consequence of it's singular commitment to power as an end-in-itself evil must always inevitably devour itself.
This THISSSS, tolkien work is a master peice cause besides the writing and the amazing movies you could tell each step, each word was written with love and care in it, making you feel like your not just a outsider looking in but like your seeing it from the perspective of the charaters, each "pointless" detail is really a good one cause, well their on a adventure and we're seeing it through their eyes, so of course we may see something thats basically pointless but its detail adds to it, a simple stick is a stick but write it right then its still a stick but now i wanna know why as long as you dont wind bag it atleast
She created the character Osha, a shallow Gen z sociopath. "But Qimir is soooo hot! Yeah he killed my friends but did you see that smokin' bod?" Great work Lesley
Just Some Guy, there is a very simple explanation for why Hardwalls is protecting the institution. She's the on-screen representation of what Headland did when she was Weinstein's assistant.
@@Wyqnoone of weinsteins lawyers works in producing films now and mysteriously everything he wants to make gets made (and it's all female centric films to make matters worse).
That head nod when he says "like my father before me" is a wonderful detail I didn't notice until now. Even in the face of certain death, having thrown away his only defense against whatever the Emperor would throw at him next, Luke loved his father and made sure to slip it in in what might have been his last moment before a horrible death.
@@GodOfPlague That is brilliant! And it could have themes about Jedi and their ideologies about love. Maybe that could be what turns them to the dark side. I am a genius.
A little correction: this doesn't happen when you don't understand Star Wars, this happens when yoyu don't understand yourself and confuse a job that you are supposed to do with your psychotherapy. A _lot_ of things that Headland inserted, or thinks she did, into the Acolyte are fairly disturbing, to the point that it makes me feel sorry for her - though not enough to excuse the atrocious writing.
There are people that can engage with their trauma and show it to the world in thoughtful and moving ways, like hayao miyazaki, who said all his past movies were for/about his mother, who died when he was young. Can you say the same about this show? How can an artist help other people understand themselves or feel shared humanity when they're not involving the trauma and art with some level of honesty? She wanted to put her issues into the show but didn't do the work, and it shows. Why subject yourself to that and not go all the way, further more, why use corporate media to do it? Now her very personal pain is going to mocked relentlessly. It is sad, but the more I think about it, the less it makes sense.
The reason that these people keep siding with the villains. Is because they are villains. Weather they realise it or not. And it sounds like Leslye is a classic example of a villain who does NOT see themselves as a villain.
Who sees themselves as a villain? Everybody *thinks* they're doing the right thing even when they're not. People are very good at justifying their actions after the fact and not seeing any difference.
@@crakhaed when you outright say corruption is good don't you on some level admit to yourself you're bad? And then just have to say 'bad is good' and go insane?
@@visisius9339 I would think so. It doesn't seem possible to still think you're a good person when you're doing things that are clearly bad. But ig cognitive dissonance and mental gymnastics allow them to carry on. Crazy 😂
A well written villain has to be the hero of their own story. There are no heroes in Disney Star Wars because the writers don't know what a 'hero' is. This is also why there are so thoroughly incapable of 'deconstructing' anything, they simply do not comprehend that which they're attempting to rebuild.
Leslie doesn’t just fail to understand SW. it’s kinda obvious she doesn’t understand difference between good and evil. Osha joined hands with Quimir who kills innocent people (apothecary in second episode), and murders Sol who saved her life twice in previous two days (frozen planet, attack by flying lightsaber). And Leslie thinks we should care for those two. We can care for bad people in movies, but for that you should make us empathise with them. And that is another thing Leslie has problems with. We know Oshas mother was stupid enough to kill herself with Jedi, we know other mother is just evil, we know witches were dark side users - so we don’t care about them and cannot justify murder of Sol. And there was no journey of self discovery or corruption so that we see her as tragic figure, like Anakin. No, she is just murderer, and it’s disturbing that someone thinks we should like her.
Isaiah 5:20 type of people. “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Why didn't you also mention Quimir killing all those Jedi, including Osha's friends? How about him trying to kill both Osha and Mei? She is actually horny for a ruthless killer while the killer did nothing to redeem himself. Even freaking Twilight knew to make the main lust-targets be only dangerous by their nature, not their intent.
@@sugartoothYT Because it's hard to tell if they were her friends, and you can write it off as a battle. And I've mentioned Quimir's attempt to kill her. However, fair points. What I wrote if far from my complete list of thoughts on topic, and in other places i gave sometimes more deep commentary.
Weinstein's personal assistant...I wonder if she would understand the difference between good and evil... I would have guessed no before. Still doesn't conquer the lousy writing either!
@@Alpha___00 "write it off as a battle" really doesn't fly though. He is the aggressor, he is the one attacking, he is the criminal who cannot be allowed to continue freely. If someone got caught by the police and butchered them all, can that be "written off" as well?
Headland already said before the show premiered that she went to KK with an entirely different script. But then KK supposedly said to her "you've written me a Star Wars script. Now go an write me a Headland script." So this trash is the Headland script: her own personal story, played out in what her twisted mind sees as the Star Wars universe.
I really don't understand why they didn't maintain that casting choice. The EU touched on the Empire being prejudiced against non-human races and women - it wouldn't be too difficult to slip homophobia in there too. Plus I suspect Palpatine is so evil he wouldn't respect people's pronoun choices.
It's boggles my mind. WHY Headland? I wonder how long she knew Kathleen Kennedy for her to just get her own show, based on her own problems with her family and her strained relationship with her sister... when she should've gone to therapy instead. It's so bizarre... she's not even known for being this talented writer or even director. People who say stuff like, "Well, it's because she worked for Weinstein, she kept her mouth shut and is bring rewarded, etc." Are starting to sound right lol. I can't get over choosing some random asshole like her to have all of this control and create her own show that's set in the SW world but doesn't actually revolve around the ideas, lore and basis of SW, just says it does. Instead she just hitched her poorly written shitty creation to SW. She should've done a totally stand alone story but then she wouldn't have gotten $180 million! That's another thing, what an insanely huge budget. It's just... none of it makes any sense! I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone lmfao.
@leviticusprime4904 Only a sith Lord deals in absolutes. 😂 I mean the few episodes I did watch, were.... Okay. They weren't as good as The Mandalorian, but Disney has been doing 1 step forward 2 steps back.
@@sweetchristmas101 Naa I think he would allow their pronoun choices as part of his divide and conquer strategy. The pronoun language is so incredibly divisive because it quite literally divides people into different groups of people based on how they feel at the time. Of course in the end he would turn on these people after he has brought them down and completely ruined their lives or at the very least coerced them into compliance by convincing that he is indeed on the side of the righteous.
Osha was literally all about the Light Side of the Force and was tracking Qymir to kill him when his defenses were down - until she saw Qymir's fine (?) ass; then she embraced the Dark Side. I hate that that's not even hyperbolic; it's literally how it plays out.
“Positive corruption”. Another brilliant piece of writing. Right up there with what Headland called Sol’s “benign sexism”. Acolyte is a case study of what happens when people let the concepts of good and evil get a little fuzzy.
"Positive corruption" so like a sacrifice for the greater good? Like if a person had to surrender to a dark power or evil entity, and while it will save the world that person is lost forever? Cause I don't think the writers for star wars now are smart enough to write anything like that. Technically kotor specifically kotor 2 already covered this subject of people not being able to tell the difference between jedi and sith. To the average joe of star wars, they are the same thing, people who use this power called the force but have different philosophies on how to use it. This was mainly caused because in the last hundred or so years, every major war that left scars throughout the galaxy had been caused by jedi that fell to the dark side that started with Exar Kun, Revan and Malak, then Sith Triumvirate. People were scared and tired of the constant wars that from their eyes happened due to the jedi not being to either control themselves or couldn't prevent corruption. This is why the other name for the latter half is called the Jedi Civil War.
I love those 2 games and after Reven, Kreia is my favourite character. There's a line where she asks the exile "Did Revan trully fall.... or did he take up the mantel of Dark Lord in order to stop the destruction of the galaxy" She also asks valid questions criticising the Jedi also; "If when so many Jedi fall, they almost destroy the entire galaxy, then does the fault lie in the Jedi teachings or the masters themselves. They made the Jedi look like incompetent idiots rather than trying to figure out a way to make them seem like the "bad guy" if that's what they were going for Neither of the twins have any clear motivation and flip flop on their decisions so does any one actually care why she joined the sith or what happens next??
I can think of this happening only one time in a story. It was called SlugTera. The Slugs (Litteral Ammo with personalities) couldn't use their powers while in "dark realm", unless they became Goules. (Essentially evil corrupted Slugs). They volunteered to do this in order for the heroes to have a fighting chance to escape said dark realm (while knowing full well that one of their allies could heal them all once they make it back to the real world and shut the portal.) They risked being corrupted forever to help save the world. Even after it was over, they were all scolded for doing what they did. Told that they were unworthy for falling into temptation like that, but I'm starting to digress. This was the closest thing to a "positive corruption" and it was done by a show over 10 years OLDER than this BS. In a show made for Children, which clearly made more sense than this SLOP of BS we see/hear about in this show.
Oh no. It goes FURTHER back than that. 10,000 years before even the start of the High Republic was the First Great Schism. The Split between the Jedi and Dark Jedi. The events that lead up to KOTOR is actually the aftermath of the THIRD Great Schism and the birth of the Sith Order. It was the FOURTH Great Schism that finally killed the Old Republic and led to the Dark Age of the Republic before we even reach the High Republic and Yoda.
Thank you for quoting "I am a Jedi, like my father before me." That was screaming in my head and her warped concept of the moment. He literally explains generational legacy the same scene!
I hate this (actual) corruption of this universe. Star Wars, the embodiment of Joseph Campbell's incredible life's work and influence on Lucas, the gold standard of storytelling, and we get a postmodernist, nihilistic misery of a "positive corruption arc" because villains are so sympathetic and gray. Make it stop. We don't need 2D characters and nuance is fine, but I'm sick of the "we must subvert and deconstruct every single thing" It's overdone now.
The problem I have with this show is that it actually *fails* as a deconstruction - if anything, it shows us that the main character is living in her own world all the while the author is trying really hard to convince the audience that the main character’s interpretation of the world is the actual world when it’s clearly not the case! KOTOR II did a great job deconstructing the “Star Wars” universe because the author knew the lore very well and played the tropes of that universe so straight that it almost hurt (which is the point - to confront the audience with the deeper implications of of a universe that functions as the result of an impersonal entity with a will of its own driving it) - the author of “Disney Wars: The Acolyte” doesn’t understand the lore well enough to deconstruct it and apparently doesn’t understand the basics of storytelling…
@@Karackal Ok - I think that seeing some really bad attempts at deconstruction has turned you off to the whole idea, but the flip-side of the equation is that a good deconstruction can lead to revolutions within a genre as authors become more aware of what they are doing and why! It’s not a bad thing - it’s just that the current crop of Hollywood writers are bad at it…
@@VorpalSpider69 that's slightly different, at least headland has actual experience prior to star wars. Meanwhile those two morons this is their first real project.
There is a kid's show from well over a decade ago called "Slug Terra". The heroes were forced to turn to the dark side (in this case use "Dark Water" in order to turn their Slugs into Evil Goules) in order for them to literally have a fighting chance. That's what a "positive corruption arc" would look like.... There are also several shows and franchises that use similar tactics that force heroes to experience "corruption" in order to force themselves to grow and understand what it is that they are fighting. Digimon had Dark Digivolution, which was important to Tai's character arch. And I'm sure many of us can think of situations similar to this. More recently (although still over a decade ago, the main character in Yugioh Arc-V was forced to go through corruption multiple times. Also Spoilers, sorry. He had to go through it in order for the true villain of the series to even appear, SO THAT everyone could finally defeat him forever instead of simply delaying his inevitable return.) That all said, while these could arguably be examples of "positive corruption arcs".... NONE OF THIS IS THIS BS WE SEE IN "Star Wars". Essentially when she uses the phrase it has no meaning. She's just trying to say something in order to sound like she's smarter than she really is.
positive corruption? wouldn't that be a redemption arc or any other variant of the heroes journey or positive character journey because these two words do not make sense
Yeah, the only logical way to square that circle is for an evil character to slowly be convinced to be good, without realizing it along the way. Step by step, choosing kindness, altruism and good over selfishness and evil. Justifying it to themselves, more and more lying to themselves about the reasons for what they are doing. Assuring themselves "I can stop being nice any time I want." until eventually they are forced to confront the reality that they aren't the same anymore. That they lost sight of why they were doing these things and now are too comfortable doing good for others to go back to how they lived before. Seriously, there's room to make that paradox work.
The Dagabah Vader scene was telling Luke that he's his own worst enemy. Luke asks, "What's in there?" and Yoda responds, "Only what you take with you.". Luke took his own fears and doubts and hubris and impetuousness. All Luke's insecurities and flaws were reflected back on himself in the embodiment of the IMAGE of his worst enemy, Vader, but the image of himself inside Vader tells him that HE is his own worst enemy. He can only become a Jedi when he overcomes his own faults.
The term "family" has been radically transformed over the last decade: it has been generalized from an intimately-related social unit to *any social unit* whatsoever. Thus, Osha's weak relationship to Sol passed as "familial" in the parlance Leslye recognizes.
Exactly, you can side with what someone says, but not agree with their actions/response to what they said. Let alone condone it. For example, (warning this is rather crazy story, It was also a "funny story" in the words of that She Devil in The Young Turks. L'll do my best to tell it without her... crudeness.): In Russia, a man tried to rob this convenience store. The owner of the store stopped him. We can all agree that it's a good thing that she stopped him and agree that everyone has the Right to defend themselves.... That said, the story didn't end there. The store owner then tied him up, force fed him Viagra and "SnuSnu" him for 3 days. When the police finally saved him, the man needed surgery just so that "it" wouldn't FALL OFF. Again Anna, told this tale as a "funny story" and she laughed about it. This actually happened to someone. We can all agree that Robbing a store is wrong AND that it deserves punishment. You can even praise the fact that this woman was able to defend herself. However, that does NOT mean we condone these Cruel Punishments and crimes done in Response to the man. He was just a thief and I'm not even sure he was even threatening her life in order to steal from her (based on how Anna told it, I mean).
There are ways to make intriguing villain-centered stories. You can have villains who are competent- not "and I win the fight because the script says so", but actually _competent_ , as in "these are my objectives, this is what I do to achieve them, this is how I adapt when unexpected things happen". You can invite the audience to empathize with their feelings and motivations, to understand how they might find themselves in a similar place. "The Acolyte" doesn't do that. It stumbles around like it doesn't know _what_ it wants to do, let alone how to get there. And, yes, art _can_ be political. But "all art _is_ political" is the domain of people who need it to be so they can know whether should like or condemn it, because they have no actual taste.
She understands it quite well. What she is writing isn't "Star Wars," it's a parable of her own depraved lifestyle and that of her former boss. We need to STOP assuming these people are "incompetent" and unaware of what they are doing. It's not true.. They know damn well what they are doing. Yoda is next.
Well , of course she doesn't understand Star Wars ! She didn't understand Star Wars when she was a kid and no one would let her play Star Wars with them , and she doesn't understand Star Wars now.
I love how she says vernestra was protecting her institution by blaming Sol when blaming Sol is the worst thing she could do for the security of said institution
Right?! She had the entire coven of witches right there as a scapegoat. Who would have doubted that they were murderous lunatics that messed up everything? And given how she already lost one Padawan, her framing it as another Jedi falling from his tenets is likely the worst move she could have chosen.
Its always wild when someone who created a show does post-mortem analsies on their own creation and just… completly misunderstands the thing they wrote themselves
Remember playing Knights of the Old Republic, and constantly being tempted to the Dark Side, wether through “insta-win” dialogue options, or powers, and yet, you never did, (at least in the first play-through, you monsters) despite the game being probably way more easy and fun that way? Me too. It’s called having a conscience, and resisting the temptations of the dark side aka EVIL.
Was it the kinda game you could quicksave on, or make another file to try out different paths with different conversation choices? Or more like mass effect. Probably mass effect, right? Same studio?
And KOTOR whipped out a nasty whammy or two if you did go Dark. First game, your party members would revolt and most of them end up dead. There's also a cut Dark Side female only ending that might not be very "Star Wars" but it is a very bittersweet option ala Rogue One. Thing that prevented many a Dark Side run? Your player party. They were overwhelmingly LS (and the highest LS scores weren't even on the Jedi!), and well written to the point where the player was encouraged to want to see them happy.
Of course I did dark side my first Kotor play-through. Shame on you for implying that’s where the Acolyte went wrong. That show does not understand or explode the dark-side, it just thinks it does.
Kathleen Kennedy told Headland to make "a Leslye Headland show." She wrote what she knew (from the perspective as the former assistant to Harvey Weinstein as well as being a queer woman) interspersing the "show" with elements having absolutely nothing to do with Star Wars lore, which clearly showed in the end product. She absolutely did not care one bit about Star Wars, only co-opting it because of the following (that it once had), and as a further opportunity to subvert it as "Ruin" Johnson did (who also had the blessing of Kennedy to do so).
George kept it very simple, though plenty fans fail to understand it: Balance of the force (and thus a healthy balance among all living things) is supremacy of the 'light side', the dark side will ALWAYS corrupt the force and disturb the balance, as it always hinders or outright destroys life. The dark side is a tool to further personal goals and fullfill pleasure-driven emotions such as greed, material and for power You cannot have a good dark side. There are people in the star wars universe that are more moderate, like Count Dooku, who restricts his usage of the darkside, but pure full-on dark side users will always be corrupted by their own power, more visible on their appearance as it always betrays them there Palpatine's face wasn't deformed by the force lightning Mace Windu deflected, his true face was merely revealed. There's nothing positive about Osha's corruption, to corrupt oneself on the dark side is to corrupt the living force and disturb the balance The star wars universe is not our own, one cannot moderate and keep everything in balance and well. One cuts themselves completely from the temptations of the dark side, or they aid in the disturbance of balance It's why the Jedi Order is so macabre and monstrous in our viewer point of view. Taking away very young children and indoctrinating them to have no emotions and forget their parents? Monstrous in our eyes but a necessary burden these children must be educated to properly handle in-universe. Because they're the few thousands that have this power, and if they don't control their power, they will inevitably use it in links to the dark side to fullfill their base human goals, thus disturbing the balance of the force. I always wanted an official (i.e. a show/movie rather than just in video games or comics) take on a Sith/dark side POV, but not one pandering the "good sith", I want sith, as in, bad people/people that use the force for their personal whims. Who bend it to their will and inadvertedly disturb its balance. There was a problem with the Jedi, they WERE too set in their ways, they had grown rigid in their own dogma. But their core philosophy is inherently righteous in-universe, because their philosophy is the only road to true balance of the force. I have issues that this core philosophy of star wars will also go way over the heads of the team supposedly making a movie on the first Jedi...it's a simple enough concept, and there's plenty of videos and documentaries out there of Lucas explaining it. Basically, there's no yin yang in star wars. Yin is the only way for all living things to be at peace in balance, yang is the tool of those who seek to use the force as a means to reach any and every personal goal and nevermind their personal natural limitations, be it from ending a rival's life, to permanently extending their own.
Wait. Wait wait wait. They actually named the Korean actor's character "Sol"? Like, I thought that was a joke the UA-cam commentariat came up with. They actually went with a homophone for Seoul? 😂
"Positive Corruption", yeah we've been getting a lot of that these past years. How much longer can star wars last when they continue to hire these hacktivists to write their stories? They dont care about star wars and just want a fucking therapy session.
The 'positive corruption' of STAR WARS is the **entire** point. They keep saying over and over that they want to move away from Lucas' vision. They are midwits who think they are artistic geniuses. They're turning a $4 billion franchise into a $4.50 franchise, shrieking at their hated fans the whole way.
Starwars specific stuff is only a secondary problem. The main problem is that the narrative runs on random with no foundation no consequence, no continuity and coherence, blundering through the 8 episodes. The Jedi team is on the planet just by chance, they run into the girls by chance. Core motivation of Sol is supposed to get a padawan, but we know nothing about the onboarding process and why it did not work out for him. Torbin's motivation "go home" is crazy for a person who joined an intergalactic militarized police force. The sisters are changing their relationship at random, from killing each other to hugging each other and back. The fire was a random event. The concept of the "power of many" is bogus decoration, whenever cooperative force use is shown, the group/two loose. Impersonation is absurd, Mae has a large tattoo on her forehead, Osha does not - in 3D, insane amounts of plaster would have to be applied to "hide" it. The concept of the twins being one person is never demonstrated, just there for styrofoam drama. Head witch turning into smoke monster most likely is another "misunderstanding", might signal "readiness to negotiate" or something in their culture. Why would she attack, if she was ready to hand over Osha? I say only one thing 10 (!) writers for 8 episodes. Someone should have coordinated this flock of chickens, but obviously no one did. Reeks of nepotism, onboard as many friends (& family, but that was another department) as you can.
The temptation scene is even more poignant because Yoda even tells him exactly what will happen, there's nothing in there except "what he brings with him".
5:57- Ugggggggggh that quote, you can HEAR the queer angst leaking through. Headland, no one wants to hear about where on the doll religion hurt you. This is neither the time nor place to air those grievances out.
ITT: JSG talks about how evil isn't a gradient, sometimes. Sometimes evil is just evil. Kind like how Maleficent, a name which literally means evil, shouldn't have been made sympathetic. Their worldview literally simultaneously says that there is no real good and evil, and anything that opposes us is evil. Those are automatically bad. Will it be bad tomorrow? Depends on if that is expedient for our us and our goals.
She missed everything about what SW is about simply because she never watched SW. It was so obvious the day she was asked which movie was her favorite and she stupidly answered ''there are no SW movies, only SW.'' She didn't know and she didn't care. She only wanted to exploit an established brand for her own selfish needs. Yep, another one of those people.
@@dearthofdoohickeys4703 Exactly why I on the other hand doubt she ever did. This sounds like someone who read Wookiepedia and never watched Anakin kill children and choke his wife or Palpatine torture Luke.
"I am a Jedi, like my father before me!" A single line shows *everything* you need to know to understand the entire point of the OT. If Headland and the others somehow failed to grasp that, they could have rewatched literally TWO minutes of RotJ on loop for half an hour, and things should have been clear. It is truly mind-bending.
Thank you for the detailed breakdown. Ironically you did a better job making sense of "the villain"in the Acolyte's writing and their motivation, than Lesley did in making sense of the villain in the Acolyte story itself.
I feel like Hollywood writing would improve tenfold if we offered free mental health counseling to come to terms with their daddy issues to Californians
@@TheRealBlackarrot naw I still say let her rot inside her own thoughts, everyone struggling could've used a donation of some of that amount. It would've gone to feeding many people.
You can tell before a show or movie even releases if it will suck by interviews with the creator. If most of it is about them and their life it’s going to suck. If they took about the lore and the all the stuff before them it has a chance. If I’m hearing about your sex life or politics I literally couldn’t care less.
Leslie hedlund understands nothing she was a intern she was never anybody that mattered. WTF is a positive corruption Arc? That's like saying you can be positively murdered or positively violated.
Fun fact for what I read on Wikipedia play disappearance was more like a studio demand than anything else in fact the show ends with those two looking at the sun was not the ending of the episode it was play his appearance the idea mean they wanted the characters to have a happy ending which honestly it feels more like they didn't want to include him when someone said put in there
This is gold for me in so many ways around the middle part so thank you for sharing your thoughts. I may not share all your views, but that shouldn't keep us from sharing and connecting on views we do share. 7:49
You need to rename the video to "Lesley Headland doesn't understand morality and humans"
THIS💯💯
And people see why people question just how much involved she was in with her former boss.
"We cannot do wrong; neither have we any disposition to do it, for we do not know what it is."
This times a million. Her moral compass is completely broken.
"Lesley Headland doesn't understand -morality and humans- _anything_ " - Fixed it for you ;)
Ah, so she wanted to tell us about HER views. What she needs to understand is that we don't CARE about her views.
She just can't.
👏👏👏 she had no business making something for SW. It's embarrassing
... She served harvey... Does her view matter? :)
@@done9137She wants allies, not friends.
YHATZEE!!
Things Headland doesn't understand:
Star wars
Good vs Evil
The hero's journey
Narrative dissonance
Character motivation
Basic storytelling
Basic human interaction
Basic morality
I could go on but I'd be here all day.
What she does understand:
Being gay
I mean tbf, if you were weinsteins personal assistant I doubt you’d remember how it was to be human
Stories from the 90s to 2000s had a Shinto mindset.
If you're working on a story from around this time and don't have that mindset why are you even writing it?
Shinto mindsets:
•Starwars
•I have no mouth and I must scream
•Startrek
•Bleach
•(Early) Naruto
•Akira
•Back to the future
•Terminator
This was the era when people feared that nature(including humans) would be replaced since technology was advancing so quickly.
If you don't have a Shinto mindset don't touch a Shinto story.
This is like a non christian creating Christian media.... actually scratch that. Zelda and angels egg are technically created by people who lost faith in said religion but they at least they were religious at some point.
So Anakin Skywalker got groomed and manipulated by Emperor Palpatine into betraying the Jedi and going to the Dark Side. As Darth Vader, he brought about galactic genocide, slaughtered children, choked the woman he loved into unconsciousness when she tried to stop him, he turned against his best friend, he lost his limbs, he got burned alive by lava and left on a hellish planet to rot away like burning trash, only to be rescued by the very man that used him, and was forced to be on life-support inside a black armor suit for the rest of his existence. He blew up entire planets full of innocent people, killed the rebels in charge of stealing the plans for the Death Star, continued killing dozens of people, Force-strangled one of his own henchmen, killed his former best friend in front of his own son Luke, sliced off said son's hand and revealed seconds later that he was his father, and continued doing the Empire's dirty work until Luke convinced him to go back to the side of good. When Palpatine tried to goad Luke into turning to the dark side, all while forcing him watch his own friends die, Luke refused to give in to his negative emotions until Vader provoked him by threatening to go after his sister Leia. Vader was defeated by Luke, but even after everything he had done, Luke STILL refused to kill his own father, prompting Palpatine to try to kill Luke himself only for Vader to redeem himself at the last moments of his life, killing the Emperor even while he was spitting Force lightning out of his fingers, electrocuting himself in the process.
Despite Palpatine's manipulations and his horrific actions as Darth Vader, the dude ended up dying as Anakin Skywalker.
There is nothing about the tragedy of Anakin Skywalker that is "positive corruption". There is nothing positive about the Dark Side of the Force. It's like calling the One Ring "positive corruption". It's like a drug, addicting and seductive (and not in the sexual way like Headland foolishly misinterpreted it as). It slowly eats away at you and corrupts you, turning you against the people you would normally love, and transforming you physically and mentally into the very worst shell of yourself, and all while lying to you that THAT is your true self and who you're meant to be, and those that are trying to stop you from giving in to the dark side are only hindering you.
So to see Leslye Headland glorifying and romanticizing corruption itself is just disturbing.
I bet if Osha and Mae had been two brothers, while Smilo Ren had been a woman, it wouldn't be considered a "positive corruption arc" to her, but "toxic masculinity".
👏 👏 👏 👏 What a brilliant comment!! I absolutely agree and couldn't have written this as well as you did. If only Leslye would read comments like these and try to get it through her thick head! 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
comments like this makes me still read them
And Leslie opened the door to scores of Weinstein's victims, she was his Acolyte.
Even Kotoe 2 does this with the Sith. We see how the dark side completely eroded the masters, Darth Nihilus is just a hungry entity with no purpose, Darth Sion's body nearly destroyed, held together only cause of his will. Traya was betrayed and her sight taken away from her.
I know how the Jedi get their power, it's far darker than what the others do 😊.
She doesn't understand basic storytelling.
Exactly. Or good character development
In light of all the criticism the show has received, this is what it really boils down to. Ultimately, this AGAIN is really Disney's doing. The people between Headland and Iger who could have, SHOULD have caught the MANY failings of the show before it cast should all be fired, along with Headland and Iger themselves. $180 freakin' million dollars. Inexcusable.
Yep. Or irony. It's one thing to tell a bad story. It's another thing to undo your own narrative.
She really doesn't grasp morality. There's a new batch of young adults just like her. Trying to explain that a neglectful parent is bad, but your hero slaughtering masses for their hurt feelings is literal evil is like screaming at a wall.
This is exactly the problem - she is not even close to a writer. I just finished a first book by a writer who struggled with writing relationships and how to portray them the with the mystery elements. It was more worthy of being turned into a series than this.
@chasehedges6775 Basic story structure. Setup and payoff. Episode 3 introduces the witches chant and episode 7 the vergence which is more important to the story. It's not a twists it's a u-turn.
“Positive Corruption”
You thought you did something there didn’t ya?
Aye she positively corrupted the IP and George should now sue Lucasfilm.
And here I thought jumbo shrimp was a terrible oxymoron.
i mean, hollywood in a nutshell, right? It's not that their disgusting secrets are the problems, it's merely that society at large hasn't learned to accept them yet
corruption isn't automatically a bad thing when you think about it, ya' know?
Also why hollywood is dying in a nutshell...
@@LoneSilverW0lfthat at least makes sense though as there are many sizes of shrimp, you can tell the difference between a regular shrimp and jumbo shrimp.
There is nothing positive about corruption, that is an exclusively negative trait
"positive corruption"
...i think thats just a fetish
Being a Jedi is the equivalent of being an adult who is in control of their emotions. That was the whole point of Luke's journey. Disney never understood Star Wars.
nowadays Disney thrives on adult fans who can't get a grip
@@genebaker511 no wonder the woke hacks don't understand jedi. They're never in control of their emotions, are they?
And the peak is essentially give up everything to The Force and ascend much like the Air Nomads.
Another thing these people do not understand is that the Jedi and the Sith are not inherent to either side. They religions and lifestyles. Literal Yin yang duality of morality.
@@BlueBD kinda sorta not really. Their beliefs stem from their approach to the Force, ie which side the belong to.
How does it go again? "There is no emotion, there is peace."
JRR Tolkien's great quote definitely comes to mind:
"Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good."
No wonder these people hate JK Rowling, she epitomized the nature of true evil in the very first Harry Potter she wrote with a single sentence by Voldemort that these "progressives" affirm almost VERBATIM: "There is no good and evil, there is only power, and those too weak to seek it!" They are everything they accuse the world outside of themselves of being; THEY ARE THE BADDIES, they've adorned themselves in an ideological uniform that might just as well have literal "little pictures of skulls on them". The reason why they see villainy and oppression everywhere they look is because that is ALL they believe in, all they see in the mirror and in their dreams, it's all they've got to give some sense of meaning to their lives (a meaning derived purely through negation of everything). Progressivism is nothing more than the praxis of existential nihilism, they are blinded by their faithless resentment and conviction against an existence they cannot justify as being worthy of the suffering intrinsic to the human condition. At the end of the day, it's important to remember the deeper moral of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings: the corruption of the Good by an evil is only a temporary thing, and as the very consequence of it's singular commitment to power as an end-in-itself evil must always inevitably devour itself.
This THISSSS, tolkien work is a master peice cause besides the writing and the amazing movies you could tell each step, each word was written with love and care in it, making you feel like your not just a outsider looking in but like your seeing it from the perspective of the charaters, each "pointless" detail is really a good one cause, well their on a adventure and we're seeing it through their eyes, so of course we may see something thats basically pointless but its detail adds to it, a simple stick is a stick but write it right then its still a stick but now i wanna know why as long as you dont wind bag it atleast
She created the character Osha, a shallow Gen z sociopath. "But Qimir is soooo hot! Yeah he killed my friends but did you see that smokin' bod?" Great work Lesley
Just Some Guy, there is a very simple explanation for why Hardwalls is protecting the institution.
She's the on-screen representation of what Headland did when she was Weinstein's assistant.
Makes you wonder how much dirt Headland has on people who claimed "Me too!" but were actually enthusiastically, "Quid pro quo."
Wait a minute, but wouldn't that mean Weinstein is actually innocent if he's meant to be Sol, the Jedi Hollywood, and Leslie Hardwall?
@@elemomnialpha Well.. yeah. Weinstein's accomplices were protected... and you know what that means.... he was a scapegoat.
@@Wyqnoone of weinsteins lawyers works in producing films now and mysteriously everything he wants to make gets made (and it's all female centric films to make matters worse).
@@elemomnialpha Except remember that Lesley thinks the Jedi are bad for...reasons.
That head nod when he says "like my father before me" is a wonderful detail I didn't notice until now. Even in the face of certain death, having thrown away his only defense against whatever the Emperor would throw at him next, Luke loved his father and made sure to slip it in in what might have been his last moment before a horrible death.
Oh how far we've come
if only there was a movie in Star Wars depicting how someone becomes a villain and showing why...
Marvel did it first. It’s called Spider-Man 3.
Yes a movie about a siths revenge perhaps?
@@JohnGrapes Spider Man 3 is underrated
@@GodOfPlague That is brilliant! And it could have themes about Jedi and their ideologies about love. Maybe that could be what turns them to the dark side.
I am a genius.
I see what you did there. And I like it!😂
"I made a Star Wars"
Okay. Great. We'll hang it up on the fridge next to your sister's finger painting.
Its extremely full of misandry.
A little correction: this doesn't happen when you don't understand Star Wars, this happens when yoyu don't understand yourself and confuse a job that you are supposed to do with your psychotherapy. A _lot_ of things that Headland inserted, or thinks she did, into the Acolyte are fairly disturbing, to the point that it makes me feel sorry for her - though not enough to excuse the atrocious writing.
She enabled a man to abuse women for her own power. It's no wonder she's mentally ill.
There are people that can engage with their trauma and show it to the world in thoughtful and moving ways, like hayao miyazaki, who said all his past movies were for/about his mother, who died when he was young. Can you say the same about this show? How can an artist help other people understand themselves or feel shared humanity when they're not involving the trauma and art with some level of honesty? She wanted to put her issues into the show but didn't do the work, and it shows. Why subject yourself to that and not go all the way, further more, why use corporate media to do it? Now her very personal pain is going to mocked relentlessly. It is sad, but the more I think about it, the less it makes sense.
The reason that these people keep siding with the villains. Is because they are villains. Weather they realise it or not. And it sounds like Leslye is a classic example of a villain who does NOT see themselves as a villain.
Who sees themselves as a villain? Everybody *thinks* they're doing the right thing even when they're not. People are very good at justifying their actions after the fact and not seeing any difference.
I do agree though. They certainly are villains.
She was the assistant to an extremely evil man, are we surprised she's the same way?
@@crakhaed when you outright say corruption is good don't you on some level admit to yourself you're bad? And then just have to say 'bad is good' and go insane?
@@visisius9339
I would think so. It doesn't seem possible to still think you're a good person when you're doing things that are clearly bad. But ig cognitive dissonance and mental gymnastics allow them to carry on. Crazy 😂
A well written villain has to be the hero of their own story. There are no heroes in Disney Star Wars because the writers don't know what a 'hero' is. This is also why there are so thoroughly incapable of 'deconstructing' anything, they simply do not comprehend that which they're attempting to rebuild.
Leslie doesn’t just fail to understand SW. it’s kinda obvious she doesn’t understand difference between good and evil.
Osha joined hands with Quimir who kills innocent people (apothecary in second episode), and murders Sol who saved her life twice in previous two days (frozen planet, attack by flying lightsaber).
And Leslie thinks we should care for those two. We can care for bad people in movies, but for that you should make us empathise with them. And that is another thing Leslie has problems with. We know Oshas mother was stupid enough to kill herself with Jedi, we know other mother is just evil, we know witches were dark side users - so we don’t care about them and cannot justify murder of Sol. And there was no journey of self discovery or corruption so that we see her as tragic figure, like Anakin. No, she is just murderer, and it’s disturbing that someone thinks we should like her.
Isaiah 5:20 type of people. “Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Why didn't you also mention Quimir killing all those Jedi, including Osha's friends? How about him trying to kill both Osha and Mei? She is actually horny for a ruthless killer while the killer did nothing to redeem himself. Even freaking Twilight knew to make the main lust-targets be only dangerous by their nature, not their intent.
@@sugartoothYT Because it's hard to tell if they were her friends, and you can write it off as a battle. And I've mentioned Quimir's attempt to kill her. However, fair points. What I wrote if far from my complete list of thoughts on topic, and in other places i gave sometimes more deep commentary.
Weinstein's personal assistant...I wonder if she would understand the difference between good and evil...
I would have guessed no before.
Still doesn't conquer the lousy writing either!
@@Alpha___00 "write it off as a battle" really doesn't fly though. He is the aggressor, he is the one attacking, he is the criminal who cannot be allowed to continue freely. If someone got caught by the police and butchered them all, can that be "written off" as well?
Osha turning to the dark side after she sees Qmir naked once even though he just murdered all of her friends makes no f*cking sense.
a well written woman
@ablebale1369 ironic that a female writer wrote a female character who would probably fail the Bechdel test in spirit (if not letter).
Oh it DOES make sense...but feminists wouldnt like, at all, if you told them how .
Well said !
Everything about this show is a slap in the face, Osha is a Mary Sue but can't turn dick down?
What the fuck?
Headland already said before the show premiered that she went to KK with an entirely different script. But then KK supposedly said to her "you've written me a Star Wars script. Now go an write me a Headland script."
So this trash is the Headland script: her own personal story, played out in what her twisted mind sees as the Star Wars universe.
I really don't understand why they didn't maintain that casting choice. The EU touched on the Empire being prejudiced against non-human races and women - it wouldn't be too difficult to slip homophobia in there too. Plus I suspect Palpatine is so evil he wouldn't respect people's pronoun choices.
It's boggles my mind. WHY Headland? I wonder how long she knew Kathleen Kennedy for her to just get her own show, based on her own problems with her family and her strained relationship with her sister... when she should've gone to therapy instead. It's so bizarre... she's not even known for being this talented writer or even director. People who say stuff like, "Well, it's because she worked for Weinstein, she kept her mouth shut and is bring rewarded, etc." Are starting to sound right lol. I can't get over choosing some random asshole like her to have all of this control and create her own show that's set in the SW world but doesn't actually revolve around the ideas, lore and basis of SW, just says it does. Instead she just hitched her poorly written shitty creation to SW. She should've done a totally stand alone story but then she wouldn't have gotten $180 million! That's another thing, what an insanely huge budget. It's just... none of it makes any sense! I feel like I'm in the Twilight Zone lmfao.
@@sweetchristmas101”there are only 2 genders Luke skywalker” palpatine
@leviticusprime4904 Only a sith Lord deals in absolutes. 😂 I mean the few episodes I did watch, were.... Okay. They weren't as good as The Mandalorian, but Disney has been doing 1 step forward 2 steps back.
@@sweetchristmas101 Naa I think he would allow their pronoun choices as part of his divide and conquer strategy. The pronoun language is so incredibly divisive because it quite literally divides people into different groups of people based on how they feel at the time. Of course in the end he would turn on these people after he has brought them down and completely ruined their lives or at the very least coerced them into compliance by convincing that he is indeed on the side of the righteous.
"It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing."
macbeth. just watched a terrible version that I did not enjoy :)
“Out out brief candle…walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his hour upon the stage, and then is heard no more”
Osha was literally all about the Light Side of the Force and was tracking Qymir to kill him when his defenses were down - until she saw Qymir's fine (?) ass; then she embraced the Dark Side.
I hate that that's not even hyperbolic; it's literally how it plays out.
“Positive corruption”. Another brilliant piece of writing. Right up there with what Headland called Sol’s “benign sexism”. Acolyte is a case study of what happens when people let the concepts of good and evil get a little fuzzy.
"A little fuzzy"? So far this is a clear case of someone who lacks any concept of Good and Evil. You know, like a Psychopath.
Morality is not their concern 😂
@@Snowmon89 you're telling me Harvey Weinstein's assistant lacks basic morals? Preposterous, simply unbelievable.
"Positive corruption" so like a sacrifice for the greater good? Like if a person had to surrender to a dark power or evil entity, and while it will save the world that person is lost forever? Cause I don't think the writers for star wars now are smart enough to write anything like that.
Technically kotor specifically kotor 2 already covered this subject of people not being able to tell the difference between jedi and sith. To the average joe of star wars, they are the same thing, people who use this power called the force but have different philosophies on how to use it. This was mainly caused because in the last hundred or so years, every major war that left scars throughout the galaxy had been caused by jedi that fell to the dark side that started with Exar Kun, Revan and Malak, then Sith Triumvirate. People were scared and tired of the constant wars that from their eyes happened due to the jedi not being to either control themselves or couldn't prevent corruption. This is why the other name for the latter half is called the Jedi Civil War.
Yeah, YOU know that. I know that. I bet JSG knows that. ALL of us Star Wars fans know that... but Lego Headlamp probably doesn't.
@@Jonas-lj8ul I'm reminded that this lady wants to touch kotor storylines as well. Terrible times are ahead.
I love those 2 games and after Reven, Kreia is my favourite character. There's a line where she asks the exile "Did Revan trully fall.... or did he take up the mantel of Dark Lord in order to stop the destruction of the galaxy"
She also asks valid questions criticising the Jedi also; "If when so many Jedi fall, they almost destroy the entire galaxy, then does the fault lie in the Jedi teachings or the masters themselves.
They made the Jedi look like incompetent idiots rather than trying to figure out a way to make them seem like the "bad guy" if that's what they were going for
Neither of the twins have any clear motivation and flip flop on their decisions so does any one actually care why she joined the sith or what happens next??
I can think of this happening only one time in a story. It was called SlugTera. The Slugs (Litteral Ammo with personalities) couldn't use their powers while in "dark realm", unless they became Goules. (Essentially evil corrupted Slugs). They volunteered to do this in order for the heroes to have a fighting chance to escape said dark realm (while knowing full well that one of their allies could heal them all once they make it back to the real world and shut the portal.) They risked being corrupted forever to help save the world. Even after it was over, they were all scolded for doing what they did. Told that they were unworthy for falling into temptation like that, but I'm starting to digress.
This was the closest thing to a "positive corruption" and it was done by a show over 10 years OLDER than this BS. In a show made for Children, which clearly made more sense than this SLOP of BS we see/hear about in this show.
Oh no. It goes FURTHER back than that.
10,000 years before even the start of the High Republic was the First Great Schism. The Split between the Jedi and Dark Jedi.
The events that lead up to KOTOR is actually the aftermath of the THIRD Great Schism and the birth of the Sith Order.
It was the FOURTH Great Schism that finally killed the Old Republic and led to the Dark Age of the Republic before we even reach the High Republic and Yoda.
when talentless activists are given the helm
When madness takes over and runs the ship, essentially.
when The Message is the first priority and the story comes second
@@greebj so every piece of fiction?
@@tomgu2285 No.
Thank you for quoting "I am a Jedi, like my father before me." That was screaming in my head and her warped concept of the moment. He literally explains generational legacy the same scene!
I hate this (actual) corruption of this universe. Star Wars, the embodiment of Joseph Campbell's incredible life's work and influence on Lucas, the gold standard of storytelling, and we get a postmodernist, nihilistic misery of a "positive corruption arc" because villains are so sympathetic and gray.
Make it stop. We don't need 2D characters and nuance is fine, but I'm sick of the "we must subvert and deconstruct every single thing" It's overdone now.
The problem I have with this show is that it actually *fails* as a deconstruction - if anything, it shows us that the main character is living in her own world all the while the author is trying really hard to convince the audience that the main character’s interpretation of the world is the actual world when it’s clearly not the case!
KOTOR II did a great job deconstructing the “Star Wars” universe because the author knew the lore very well and played the tropes of that universe so straight that it almost hurt (which is the point - to confront the audience with the deeper implications of of a universe that functions as the result of an impersonal entity with a will of its own driving it) - the author of “Disney Wars: The Acolyte” doesn’t understand the lore well enough to deconstruct it and apparently doesn’t understand the basics of storytelling…
@@wilberwhateley7569 Well said!
I’m tired of deconstruction.
Deconstruct deconstructionism!
@@Karackal Ok - I think that seeing some really bad attempts at deconstruction has turned you off to the whole idea, but the flip-side of the equation is that a good deconstruction can lead to revolutions within a genre as authors become more aware of what they are doing and why!
It’s not a bad thing - it’s just that the current crop of Hollywood writers are bad at it…
When someone boasts in article's she loves the thing, then every decision they make for story destroys the thing....just stop, lady!
Just like J.D. Payne and Patrick McKay saying they love Tolkien, yet giving us the burning car crash that is “Rings of Power”.
No! Give her a second season!!!! Let's see how deep the hole gets
@@VorpalSpider69 that's slightly different, at least headland has actual experience prior to star wars. Meanwhile those two morons this is their first real project.
@@VorpalSpider69 this right here!
@@jdstudios1912 im tempted...for a laugh 🤣
What the fuck is a positive corruption arc? When is corruption ever been referred as a positive?
Yeah, exactly. Every single time she opens her mouth it's more BS and word salad. I think even she doesn't know wtf she's spewing. 😂🤦♀️
@@OsloTimealso doesn’t this kinda make the empire look justified in their actions, did they accidentally make the space nazis loom like the good guys
@@OsloTimewelcome to the world of broken moral compasses.
@@rciafardone Leslye has no moral compass, she's a headlamp.
There is a kid's show from well over a decade ago called "Slug Terra". The heroes were forced to turn to the dark side (in this case use "Dark Water" in order to turn their Slugs into Evil Goules) in order for them to literally have a fighting chance. That's what a "positive corruption arc" would look like....
There are also several shows and franchises that use similar tactics that force heroes to experience "corruption" in order to force themselves to grow and understand what it is that they are fighting. Digimon had Dark Digivolution, which was important to Tai's character arch. And I'm sure many of us can think of situations similar to this. More recently (although still over a decade ago, the main character in Yugioh Arc-V was forced to go through corruption multiple times. Also Spoilers, sorry. He had to go through it in order for the true villain of the series to even appear, SO THAT everyone could finally defeat him forever instead of simply delaying his inevitable return.)
That all said, while these could arguably be examples of "positive corruption arcs".... NONE OF THIS IS THIS BS WE SEE IN "Star Wars".
Essentially when she uses the phrase it has no meaning. She's just trying to say something in order to sound like she's smarter than she really is.
The Whackolyte
Most expensive therapy in history: $180,000,000 for 8 hours.
"I know you murdered one of my friends and my implied love interest in cold blood, but Jedi bad, so let's get together."
And Feel alright 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
Next: “Leslie Headland shows the lighter side of Blade Runner”
Hell no.
Yeah, by installing brighter light bulbs.
@@ChaoticYak1 That would require actually knowing how to screw in lightbulbs.
positive corruption? wouldn't that be a redemption arc or any other variant of the heroes journey or positive character journey because these two words do not make sense
It's hollywood baby! Where corruption is the norm and morality has no meaning. Plus she used to work for Harvey Weinstein, so yeah.....
I was thinking the same thing
Yeah, the only logical way to square that circle is for an evil character to slowly be convinced to be good, without realizing it along the way. Step by step, choosing kindness, altruism and good over selfishness and evil. Justifying it to themselves, more and more lying to themselves about the reasons for what they are doing. Assuring themselves "I can stop being nice any time I want." until eventually they are forced to confront the reality that they aren't the same anymore. That they lost sight of why they were doing these things and now are too comfortable doing good for others to go back to how they lived before.
Seriously, there's room to make that paradox work.
I'm waiting for hedleen sister op saying how nasty her twin sister was when younger.
Same. I would love to see some more spice in this controversial work.
The only positive thing that came from this show is the Korean actor now knows English. Good for him😊
The Dagabah Vader scene was telling Luke that he's his own worst enemy. Luke asks, "What's in there?" and Yoda responds, "Only what you take with you.". Luke took his own fears and doubts and hubris and impetuousness. All Luke's insecurities and flaws were reflected back on himself in the embodiment of the IMAGE of his worst enemy, Vader, but the image of himself inside Vader tells him that HE is his own worst enemy. He can only become a Jedi when he overcomes his own faults.
"There is no reconciliation between father and daughter."
Mulan would like a word with you.
She's just saying words, for the sake of saying words
"The Ability To Speak Does Not Make You Intelligent" -Qui-Gon Jinn
Yeah, and only Kamala Harris is allowed to do that!!
*(cough cough)* the identification with evil *(cough cough)*
The term "family" has been radically transformed over the last decade: it has been generalized from an intimately-related social unit to *any social unit* whatsoever. Thus, Osha's weak relationship to Sol passed as "familial" in the parlance Leslye recognizes.
Nobody sided with The Executioner, what he said about the differences between humans and mutants it's what rings true.
Exactly, you can side with what someone says, but not agree with their actions/response to what they said. Let alone condone it.
For example, (warning this is rather crazy story, It was also a "funny story" in the words of that She Devil in The Young Turks. L'll do my best to tell it without her... crudeness.):
In Russia, a man tried to rob this convenience store. The owner of the store stopped him. We can all agree that it's a good thing that she stopped him and agree that everyone has the Right to defend themselves.... That said, the story didn't end there.
The store owner then tied him up, force fed him Viagra and "SnuSnu" him for 3 days. When the police finally saved him, the man needed surgery just so that "it" wouldn't FALL OFF.
Again Anna, told this tale as a "funny story" and she laughed about it. This actually happened to someone. We can all agree that Robbing a store is wrong AND that it deserves punishment. You can even praise the fact that this woman was able to defend herself. However, that does NOT mean we condone these Cruel Punishments and crimes done in Response to the man. He was just a thief and I'm not even sure he was even threatening her life in order to steal from her (based on how Anna told it, I mean).
The whole "positive corruption" thing says it all... In the wise words of Luke: "That's not how [corruption] works!"
That was jake skywalker
@@BonusCrook right right... my bad. I get them mixed up sometimes lol.
@@lasercraft32 xd
@@BonusCrookactually, that was Jake Solo.
She's trying to tell us about her 5 years with her old boss. Positive corruption
There are ways to make intriguing villain-centered stories. You can have villains who are competent- not "and I win the fight because the script says so", but actually _competent_ , as in "these are my objectives, this is what I do to achieve them, this is how I adapt when unexpected things happen". You can invite the audience to empathize with their feelings and motivations, to understand how they might find themselves in a similar place. "The Acolyte" doesn't do that. It stumbles around like it doesn't know _what_ it wants to do, let alone how to get there.
And, yes, art _can_ be political. But "all art _is_ political" is the domain of people who need it to be so they can know whether should like or condemn it, because they have no actual taste.
"Destroy his generational lineage." Oh, I'm sorry, I thought Luke was actually redeeming his father to *restore* his generational lineage.
Nobody presently working in Disney/Lucasfilm understands Star Wars
She understands it quite well. What she is writing isn't "Star Wars," it's a parable of her own depraved lifestyle and that of her former boss.
We need to STOP assuming these people are "incompetent" and unaware of what they are doing. It's not true.. They know damn well what they are doing.
Yoda is next.
"Positive corruption".
You would think that a writer would know how words work but here we are, I guess.
Well , of course she doesn't understand Star Wars ! She didn't understand Star Wars when she was a kid and no one would let her play Star Wars with them , and she doesn't understand Star Wars now.
XD She's out here like "But the dark side is clearly so healthy! Let me be the Empress-"
@@andrewwoodhead3141 this right here, they wouldn't let her play now she has to destroy our favorite toy, just like a bully
I love how she says vernestra was protecting her institution by blaming Sol when blaming Sol is the worst thing she could do for the security of said institution
Right?! She had the entire coven of witches right there as a scapegoat. Who would have doubted that they were murderous lunatics that messed up everything? And given how she already lost one Padawan, her framing it as another Jedi falling from his tenets is likely the worst move she could have chosen.
1st vid I’ve watched on this channel, very impressive insight and interpretations were articulated very well. Well done Guy. Subbed.
Its always wild when someone who created a show does post-mortem analsies on their own creation and just… completly misunderstands the thing they wrote themselves
Really wild. Makes you wonder how it happens. I mean, she made the thing! 😂 how can she not know?
In short: Leslie Headlamp is creatively bankrupt.
And gay. We're supposed to focus on that part.
And morally corrupt and proud of it 😂
Remember playing Knights of the Old Republic, and constantly being tempted to the Dark Side, wether through “insta-win” dialogue options, or powers, and yet, you never did, (at least in the first play-through, you monsters) despite the game being probably way more easy and fun that way? Me too. It’s called having a conscience, and resisting the temptations of the dark side aka EVIL.
Was it the kinda game you could quicksave on, or make another file to try out different paths with different conversation choices? Or more like mass effect. Probably mass effect, right? Same studio?
And KOTOR whipped out a nasty whammy or two if you did go Dark. First game, your party members would revolt and most of them end up dead. There's also a cut Dark Side female only ending that might not be very "Star Wars" but it is a very bittersweet option ala Rogue One.
Thing that prevented many a Dark Side run? Your player party. They were overwhelmingly LS (and the highest LS scores weren't even on the Jedi!), and well written to the point where the player was encouraged to want to see them happy.
Of course I did dark side my first Kotor play-through. Shame on you for implying that’s where the Acolyte went wrong. That show does not understand or explode the dark-side, it just thinks it does.
Kathleen Kennedy told Headland to make "a Leslye Headland show." She wrote what she knew (from the perspective as the former assistant to Harvey Weinstein as well as being a queer woman) interspersing the "show" with elements having absolutely nothing to do with Star Wars lore, which clearly showed in the end product. She absolutely did not care one bit about Star Wars, only co-opting it because of the following (that it once had), and as a further opportunity to subvert it as "Ruin" Johnson did (who also had the blessing of Kennedy to do so).
George kept it very simple, though plenty fans fail to understand it: Balance of the force (and thus a healthy balance among all living things) is supremacy of the 'light side', the dark side will ALWAYS corrupt the force and disturb the balance, as it always hinders or outright destroys life. The dark side is a tool to further personal goals and fullfill pleasure-driven emotions such as greed, material and for power
You cannot have a good dark side. There are people in the star wars universe that are more moderate, like Count Dooku, who restricts his usage of the darkside, but pure full-on dark side users will always be corrupted by their own power, more visible on their appearance as it always betrays them there
Palpatine's face wasn't deformed by the force lightning Mace Windu deflected, his true face was merely revealed.
There's nothing positive about Osha's corruption, to corrupt oneself on the dark side is to corrupt the living force and disturb the balance
The star wars universe is not our own, one cannot moderate and keep everything in balance and well. One cuts themselves completely from the temptations of the dark side, or they aid in the disturbance of balance
It's why the Jedi Order is so macabre and monstrous in our viewer point of view. Taking away very young children and indoctrinating them to have no emotions and forget their parents?
Monstrous in our eyes but a necessary burden these children must be educated to properly handle in-universe. Because they're the few thousands that have this power, and if they don't control their power, they will inevitably use it in links to the dark side to fullfill their base human goals, thus disturbing the balance of the force.
I always wanted an official (i.e. a show/movie rather than just in video games or comics) take on a Sith/dark side POV, but not one pandering the "good sith", I want sith, as in, bad people/people that use the force for their personal whims. Who bend it to their will and inadvertedly disturb its balance.
There was a problem with the Jedi, they WERE too set in their ways, they had grown rigid in their own dogma. But their core philosophy is inherently righteous in-universe, because their philosophy is the only road to true balance of the force.
I have issues that this core philosophy of star wars will also go way over the heads of the team supposedly making a movie on the first Jedi...it's a simple enough concept, and there's plenty of videos and documentaries out there of Lucas explaining it.
Basically, there's no yin yang in star wars. Yin is the only way for all living things to be at peace in balance, yang is the tool of those who seek to use the force as a means to reach any and every personal goal and nevermind their personal natural limitations, be it from ending a rival's life, to permanently extending their own.
God, 4 mins in and you get it straightaway. They should have hired you
I feel like she is trying to use fancy words to sound cool without understanding what she is talking about.
Wait. Wait wait wait. They actually named the Korean actor's character "Sol"? Like, I thought that was a joke the UA-cam commentariat came up with. They actually went with a homophone for Seoul? 😂
Yes🤦🏻♂️
Forget “Star Wars” - she doesn’t understand the basics creative writing!
Or human behaviour, or morality.
I bet Lesley Understood Harvey…
"Positive Corruption", yeah we've been getting a lot of that these past years.
How much longer can star wars last when they continue to hire these hacktivists to write their stories? They dont care about star wars and just want a fucking therapy session.
I imagine Pavlov would do more good than Freud....
A $180 million therapy session
The 'positive corruption' of STAR WARS is the **entire** point. They keep saying over and over that they want to move away from Lucas' vision. They are midwits who think they are artistic geniuses. They're turning a $4 billion franchise into a $4.50 franchise, shrieking at their hated fans the whole way.
Starwars specific stuff is only a secondary problem.
The main problem is that the narrative runs on random with no foundation no consequence, no continuity and coherence, blundering through the 8 episodes.
The Jedi team is on the planet just by chance, they run into the girls by chance.
Core motivation of Sol is supposed to get a padawan, but we know nothing about the onboarding process and why it did not work out for him.
Torbin's motivation "go home" is crazy for a person who joined an intergalactic militarized police force.
The sisters are changing their relationship at random, from killing each other to hugging each other and back.
The fire was a random event.
The concept of the "power of many" is bogus decoration, whenever cooperative force use is shown, the group/two loose.
Impersonation is absurd, Mae has a large tattoo on her forehead, Osha does not - in 3D, insane amounts of plaster would have to be applied to "hide" it.
The concept of the twins being one person is never demonstrated, just there for styrofoam drama.
Head witch turning into smoke monster most likely is another "misunderstanding", might signal "readiness to negotiate" or something in their culture. Why would she attack, if she was ready to hand over Osha?
I say only one thing 10 (!) writers for 8 episodes. Someone should have coordinated this flock of chickens, but obviously no one did. Reeks of nepotism, onboard as many friends (& family, but that was another department) as you can.
As once again Den of the Drake is proven right: GOOD writing serves the STORY. BAD writing serves the AUTHOR.
"Good for you!" And the Palpatine clip together = subscribed.
"Very few creative people can make that work; Leslye Headland is not one of them"
I'm sincerely offended that you suggested she was a creative person.
The temptation scene is even more poignant because Yoda even tells him exactly what will happen, there's nothing in there except "what he brings with him".
To the corrupted, corruption is a positive
5:57- Ugggggggggh that quote, you can HEAR the queer angst leaking through.
Headland, no one wants to hear about where on the doll religion hurt you. This is neither the time nor place to air those grievances out.
so this show was her getting back at her dad.
the dude past away before the show aired, nice.
Well, they say: Write what you know...
Positive corruption arc. Words have meanings,bor so I once thought.
I'd rather watch a full series of Lop & Ocho.
Or the Ninth Jedi or the Village Bride
ITT: JSG talks about how evil isn't a gradient, sometimes. Sometimes evil is just evil.
Kind like how Maleficent, a name which literally means evil, shouldn't have been made sympathetic. Their worldview literally simultaneously says that there is no real good and evil, and anything that opposes us is evil. Those are automatically bad. Will it be bad tomorrow? Depends on if that is expedient for our us and our goals.
How did they think we wouldn't notice them stealing from Star Wars in Star Wars...especially after the sequel trilogy.
She missed everything about what SW is about simply because she never watched SW. It was so obvious the day she was asked which movie was her favorite and she stupidly answered ''there are no SW movies, only SW.'' She didn't know and she didn't care. She only wanted to exploit an established brand for her own selfish needs. Yep, another one of those people.
I don’t doubt she watched them, she just never understood them. “The Jedi are stuffy and the sith are cool” is as far as she got.
@@dearthofdoohickeys4703 Exactly why I on the other hand doubt she ever did. This sounds like someone who read Wookiepedia and never watched Anakin kill children and choke his wife or Palpatine torture Luke.
TLDR: a raging narcissist uses personal ideology and experience to make a show. It failed spectacularly
Great analysis
11/10
"I am a Jedi, like my father before me!" A single line shows *everything* you need to know to understand the entire point of the OT. If Headland and the others somehow failed to grasp that, they could have rewatched literally TWO minutes of RotJ on loop for half an hour, and things should have been clear. It is truly mind-bending.
Just Some Guy, You're assuming that she actually watched Star Wars to begin with.
Thank you for the detailed breakdown. Ironically you did a better job making sense of "the villain"in the Acolyte's writing and their motivation, than Lesley did in making sense of the villain in the Acolyte story itself.
Yeah Sasuke really set himself up to fail there, it was hilarious.
As hilarious as giving Leslye Headland a show and tell her "Do whatever you want!"
10:46 That chant was repeated so many times i thought it would serve as foreshadowing and we would learn what it means
I feel like Hollywood writing would improve tenfold if we offered free mental health counseling to come to terms with their daddy issues to Californians
"Finger bang the sky" 😆😆😆
This is a really good channel. Thoughtful and smart.
"In an I interview with vulture...."
My goodness - the irony.
its still hard to believe headland got a star wars show
To be fair Sasuke did wanna fight the other 4 Kage. He just wanted Danzo. The other Kage just got in his way.
That $180,000,000 would've been put to better use on therapy sessions for Lesley
@@TheRealBlackarrot naw I still say let her rot inside her own thoughts, everyone struggling could've used a donation of some of that amount. It would've gone to feeding many people.
Habiendo tantas mujeres competentes y talentosas...¿eligieron a una mujer con un pasado cuestionable y poca experiencia para dirigir está mierda?
God my head hurts after listening to Headland's reasoning.
I didn't think it possible, but she actually made the show worse by opening her mouth. That is impressive.
You can tell before a show or movie even releases if it will suck by interviews with the creator. If most of it is about them and their life it’s going to suck. If they took about the lore and the all the stuff before them it has a chance. If I’m hearing about your sex life or politics I literally couldn’t care less.
Leslie hedlund understands nothing she was a intern she was never anybody that mattered.
WTF is a positive corruption Arc? That's like saying you can be positively murdered or positively violated.
Fun fact for what I read on Wikipedia play disappearance was more like a studio demand than anything else in fact the show ends with those two looking at the sun was not the ending of the episode it was play his appearance the idea mean they wanted the characters to have a happy ending which honestly it feels more like they didn't want to include him when someone said put in there
This is gold for me in so many ways around the middle part so thank you for sharing your thoughts. I may not share all your views, but that shouldn't keep us from sharing and connecting on views we do share. 7:49