Your AJo Hand is so well played. When he's bluffing AQo, he will bluff every other Combo as well. You're printing here. Also, the 10% Bet is a banger. Wouldn't have find it, but I agree, it's way better then check. I will implement this into my game in spots like this. Thank you for this hand!
perfectly - its like you spied on me how I play whales in the full ring deep ante pool on gg :D ..... just unlucky that you lost to the only bluff combo that beats you he never has value there imho
I haven't ran it through equilab but doing some quick mental math I think the regs call is fine if we assume the rec is always calling and we have 8 clean live outs.
another problem tho, is sets have significant equity vs us given the board can pair, and higher FD's also put us in a rough spot. i think its close, but likely a fold
Nice video. Love to learn how not to get anxiety when running bad. Its is more when taking shots, but also happens if I loose more than 4 buyins during a session. I studied my mental game a love and it became much better, but not close where I want too be.
hey mate - totally feel you, it's a process and does get easier in time. i will be making a mental game video in the future and will definitely address this!
lowest pairs like 22-55 make excellent bluffing candidates because they unblock 66+ which the bb will fold when you bet aggressively on high board textures.
I feel like shove the river on the first hand might be a viable option. I agree that he very likely has a king at best, but there’s a lot of daylight between Kx and AJ for a whale. If you check, he checks back all the random pocket pairs and 6x.
because I think when I b10 I allow a really wide rec to call even wider/let me know if they have trips. with that assigned range I think I xc and win vs bluffs a lot more than I do by folding and making them fold better!
A bit late, but I like the line versus rec. Sucks that he has AQ that limps lol Reminds me of a guy I played with who would just bet with any pair any time whenever and when raised small he always called. I had to stop hero calling him with A high cuz he would show fourth pair no kicker all the time lol
I had similar spot on an App game in a Bomb pot, had the OESD on T7x and was in the middle of two Recs, and one went bet, I call, IP jams, rec tank calls says he has 2pair and I have to gambol, it is slightly different because their ranges are wider preflop and defined postflop, whereas here Rec's range can be much wider and less defined, but you can assume and pair or draw (not expecting A High but I guess if you know who it is, you can expect that sort of thing) so if we assume he is raise/calling AK, AQ type hands it is a call by the Reg. AJo hand makes sense to me probably has almost 0 value here and range is mostly just bluffs so as others have said, even losing to AQ isn't enough to make me fold. Infinite potential draws.
thanks for your thoughts man. yeah your hand seems like a much clearer call off and pray. as for the AJ, yeah i didn't even think about that in game - the fact that they show up with AQ is actually not even bad lol. i would rather not have dusted it all off though :D
Really interesting hand with 55. The problem is we can have some nut flush draws which he has less outs against. Best case scenario for him is we have something like TT or JJ which is pretty narrow, and even 99 would be terrible for him. A lot more likely we have a set or a flush draw, which he's not getting the odds against even 3 ways. Equilab puts him at 29-30% against the two ranges, and he needs 31.5% not even including rake. So seems like a losing call to me.
thanks for crunching the numbers! yeah i think the fact that i can have him turbo dominated with a hand like T9fd makes the call likely just unneccessary overall
The first hand. I love the 10% turn bet. But I would have jammed river. I think you loose a lot when check check and I would have probably fold river.. I havent see villains hand yet btw
Love the AJo hand. It’s so overbluffed on this node especially with the timing that we can afford to lose to all of these AQ combos and still be printing IMO.
In last hand, reg getting ~2:1 so need ~33% equity. Assuming BU puts in all PPs, AKo-ATo and suited Ax-Qx then BU only has ~25% which would make it a fold. You could assume BU puts it in wider but its close nonetheless
87s hand is interesting! Should that hand still be opening pre-flop, given the dynamic with a maniac-type fish OTB and a good aggressive reg in the BB? I think I like the play post-flop.
@@BenaBadBeatPoker what I meant was should 87s fold pre and not even RFI? Marginal open from HJ anyway, and then you have the maniac on the button who will be doing lots of calling and 3betting (and not to mention you in the BB as well).
In the last 55 hand I think the call of the reg with an oesd and a backdoor flush draw is close but ok. His open ended straight draw to the nuts plus his backdoor flush draw should give him slightly above average equity. Even when considering that you may have a set which diminishes his equity because of your redraw he still should have close to 30% equity. That's enough to call $850 for a $3000 pot. Without the backdoor flush draw I think it would have been not enough.
Even though it was clearly gonna be a 3-way all-in spot, the guy calling with 87ss definitely had some gamble in him XDDD. I personally would not call cuz best case scenario I would have just about the right odds to call, which happened to be the case this time though.
@@BenaBadBeatPokervalue shove is pretty dumb. But it at least makes sense if he thinks you exclusively have thin value that won’t believe his jam. I can’t understand how bluffing makes any sense when he has soooo much show down value. 🤔🤔
If we're assuming the rec shoves full range he gets like 3.5/1 on the call with 8 clean outs twice with a backdoor flushdraw. I think with 29% equity aginst top of range its probably fine ish. But very marginal spot in my opinion.
78 w/ bdfd needs 30.2% to call. if you have a set he has 28%. if you have two pair he has 36.5% (assuming fish has overpairs or misc overcards that dont block his outs often). The call is winning if fish always calls. If fishie starts to fold it is certainly not so good though.
@@BenaBadBeatPoker Yes, it does account for the sets redraw boat outs. The only real disaster here is if fishie has a flush draw and you have a set (because then 2 of his straight outs are dead and he has to fade all the board pairs). In that situation he only has 17%. The fact best case its slightly winning, and worst case its hugely losing actually makes me think its a fold the more I think of it.
Fish over bluff in that line but they also have all those random pocket pairs that will shove river randomly so I think jamming yourself rather than going for a xc will be better in that spot. I think you’re just going to lose to random pairs too much when you xc
hmmm not sure I feel strongly that that could be true. I could also make the same argument that I don’t think this player profile folds those pp on the river vs shove! I would say it’s much more likely they bluff ip than they fold pp’s but I’m obv estimating with no evidence hahs
on the JJs vs 10s vs the agro reg, he probably thinks you see him as agro and might hero call a lot vs his shove, hence why he value shoves 10s. but yeah weird is that what can you have besides a random 9? you wouldnt block ak for value right? if you would his play could be genius imo
Not a fan of the AJo hand. Stab the flop OOP multiway - is that solver approved? I like the turn 10% bet, but hate the check on river. Agree it’s Kx at best, then it’s a shove? If you don’t think he will fold top pair here, then it’s check/fold?
no doubt it’s allowed to cbet yep but not sure about multi way solves. why would you hate the river check? sure if they shove a king ip then that’s a bit of a problem but I imagine there are infinite more bluffs than Kx value shoves
3:28 I get your idea here but why not betting something like 285$ then? It accomplish the same thing since I except every Tx to jam vs this size. You take a bit more of his money the times he is checking back OTR
Quick question on coin, how do you get the CHP needed to receive rake back?? I would use your code for signup with max signup bonus if you could help some. Love the videos
hey mate! just click your bankroll > BUY CHP > type some amount of USDT to convert and there you go. on monday's you will be paid your rakeback in CHP so likely won't have to top it up as much the following week. if you have any more questions just message me on discord
AJo on Q94T, I think multitabling what is easy to miss about this spot is typically we get to be a bit picky with out turn draws. Eg KT4 you get to turn with AQ AJ J9s QJs plus backdoors plus if turn is like a 6 maybe you have 87 or a 3 maybe you have A5. Here, though, you've got very few bluffs with equity available. You'd rather bet AJ than say JT and the only other bluff is AK. So yeah it just becomes mandatory, but surprisingly easy to miss on what seems like an innocuous board By the same token feels like you're supposed to jam turn once you do x but always painful when the Nash if for villain to mix folds with top pair top kicker in a 3bp
yeah excellent analysis and I too came to these conclusions after the fact. just difficult when you’re playing 10 tables to figure all that out! although I should totally have identified that turn barrel was the play tbh
as a 2NL reg I fell qualified to pass judgement on your play. that first hand you bot played the river horribly. He more so but another block bet may perform well?
@@BenaBadBeatPoker here goes :), from a recreationals point of view after your block on turn your perceived range would be weak Kx small pairs and some QJ, Ax straight draws and flush draws looking for a cheap river, after brick river your opponent IMO is unlikely to raise block though unless they are very strong as he will believe you have K at best or small pair looking for a little value and if does raise you can fold easily, limiting your downside. If they call and win you again have limited your downside. To a recreational a jam looks like you are bluffing on a blank and that is going to lose too often so that is out of the question. But a check opens all sorts of craziness as you now look like you have bricked and given up, and this is where the recreational over bluffs, unfortunately for you he doesn't think he can win enough at showdown to check back but that is recreationals for you, so a block averts this craziness and limits your downside.
interesting perspective mate. I think what we need to appreciate is that our hand does a pretty bad job of making better hands fold. when we check and call we will naturally lose to those value hands that woulda called but we allow hands that would’ve folded to bluff. I would say there is a lot more upside to checking the river but that’s only because of our exact hand. If we had a hand like QJ (no showdown or no ability to check call river) then I’d totally agree that shoving would be the best option. always need to consider where our hand is in our range!
14:50 so the reg need less than 30% eq to make the call profitable , who am i to say it’s bad/good play , but i think it’s ambitious cause you gonna play face up vs the rec. even all your bluffs are fds and he only have 24% vs them , maybe if it wasn’t b/c/r line he could justify stacking off..
Thats why I play live. When such monsters as Bena play "just" nl1k and 500nl, what are the odds of you actually reaching high stakes and making really big money online? Compared to live people donking massive amounts of money for free, easy and without really tough fight.
haha well it depends what you class as big money mate! but yep if you can hack the live poker lifestyle (which I can’t) then there is definitely a lot of money to be made!!
@@BenaBadBeatPoker not that much compared to you probably. roughly 70k a year only. its not that bad tho as i only play 6 7 months a year. i only play up to 10 25. not such shark
@@BenaBadBeatPoker its only because of the toughness of the games, i am pretty sure. You are at least 2 or 3 levels above me, skill wise, maybe even more. I am just ABC bot focusing on fat value vs whales, tbh
We've come full circle. The 1k regs are saying 'I bet the turn to see where I was at' 🤣🤣
True that. Back then, it was a fishy play, now a days everyone is doing it everywhere (to manipulate ranges).
lol.. so those high stakes donks were right all along....
lmfaoooooo love this
BenaBadBeat: 3 bet cold call expert
lmfaooooo every video
Your AJo Hand is so well played. When he's bluffing AQo, he will bluff every other Combo as well. You're printing here. Also, the 10% Bet is a banger. Wouldn't have find it, but I agree, it's way better then check. I will implement this into my game in spots like this. Thank you for this hand!
perfectly - its like you spied on me how I play whales in the full ring deep ante pool on gg :D ..... just unlucky that you lost to the only bluff combo that beats you he never has value there imho
glad you liked the line mate! I do tend to agree that this may well print long term but where is my 2k??? 🤣
I haven't ran it through equilab but doing some quick mental math I think the regs call is fine if we assume the rec is always calling and we have 8 clean live outs.
yeah my sense was that it was at least close
another problem tho, is sets have significant equity vs us given the board can pair, and higher FD's also put us in a rough spot. i think its close, but likely a fold
At 11:00 why would you fold flop with 66/77 but call 55?
one of the reasons is that when we have the lower pp's this allows oop to have more of the 76/87 suited regions
Nice video. Love to learn how not to get anxiety when running bad. Its is more when taking shots, but also happens if I loose more than 4 buyins during a session. I studied my mental game a love and it became much better, but not close where I want too be.
hey mate - totally feel you, it's a process and does get easier in time. i will be making a mental game video in the future and will definitely address this!
The spiciest set of hand histories ever!
special special ones!
Although I've been on the other side of this situation, butI can admit that it’s an amazing feeling to bluff, get called, and win the hand :D
hahahah yeah I haven’t had a hand where I’ve bluffed and been called by worse in yeaaars. so satisfying
in 11:08 why exactly would you fold 66-77 OTF and call more easily the 55? ty
lowest pairs like 22-55 make excellent bluffing candidates because they unblock 66+ which the bb will fold when you bet aggressively on high board textures.
yeh blitz mentioned some of the reasons!
AQo was a shock! Shows how important game selection is.
selecting games with me in them = profit 🤣
I feel like shove the river on the first hand might be a viable option. I agree that he very likely has a king at best, but there’s a lot of daylight between Kx and AJ for a whale. If you check, he checks back all the random pocket pairs and 6x.
honestly I’m not convinced this specific player folds those hands on the river haha
Honey he called me with AJ!! 🤣
🤣🤣🤣
With the backdoor fd as well there (last hand) I'm flicking it in if I know the fish is calling too. Gamba gamba!
gotta take the spin sometimes!
in the first hand, how come you went for a check-call on the river? the strategy i usually see is B10% on turn to then bomb river.
because I think when I b10 I allow a really wide rec to call even wider/let me know if they have trips. with that assigned range I think I xc and win vs bluffs a lot more than I do by folding and making them fold better!
@@BenaBadBeatPoker makes sense, thanks
A bit late, but I like the line versus rec. Sucks that he has AQ that limps lol
Reminds me of a guy I played with who would just bet with any pair any time whenever and when raised small he always called. I had to stop hero calling him with A high cuz he would show fourth pair no kicker all the time lol
lmaoooo that’s so good
I had similar spot on an App game in a Bomb pot, had the OESD on T7x and was in the middle of two Recs, and one went bet, I call, IP jams, rec tank calls says he has 2pair and I have to gambol, it is slightly different because their ranges are wider preflop and defined postflop, whereas here Rec's range can be much wider and less defined, but you can assume and pair or draw (not expecting A High but I guess if you know who it is, you can expect that sort of thing) so if we assume he is raise/calling AK, AQ type hands it is a call by the Reg.
AJo hand makes sense to me probably has almost 0 value here and range is mostly just bluffs so as others have said, even losing to AQ isn't enough to make me fold. Infinite potential draws.
thanks for your thoughts man. yeah your hand seems like a much clearer call off and pray. as for the AJ, yeah i didn't even think about that in game - the fact that they show up with AQ is actually not even bad lol. i would rather not have dusted it all off though :D
AJ hand was very interesting, whats the best hand you expect villain to fold vs that river jam? Great vid as usual!
cheers John! I genuinely think we can expect sets to mix fold on the river from i (maybe too ambitious??)
Really interesting hand with 55. The problem is we can have some nut flush draws which he has less outs against. Best case scenario for him is we have something like TT or JJ which is pretty narrow, and even 99 would be terrible for him. A lot more likely we have a set or a flush draw, which he's not getting the odds against even 3 ways. Equilab puts him at 29-30% against the two ranges, and he needs 31.5% not even including rake. So seems like a losing call to me.
thanks for crunching the numbers! yeah i think the fact that i can have him turbo dominated with a hand like T9fd makes the call likely just unneccessary overall
Love your line w ajo, would have called for sure to
thank you! it did not go well 🤣
me: “Bena stop cold calling, you such a wha…nevermind, well played, this guy is a whopper.”
i just don't post all the hands i cold call and get stacked obv
🚀
my guy
78s. I assume it’s just slightly losing if the rec always calls it off. Can never be that bad.
❤️
The first hand. I love the 10% turn bet. But I would have jammed river. I think you loose a lot when check check and I would have probably fold river.. I havent see villains hand yet btw
appreciate you commenting before seeing villains hand! i really don't like shoving river though tbh as i don't see this player folding much at all
Love the AJo hand. It’s so overbluffed on this node especially with the timing that we can afford to lose to all of these AQ combos and still be printing IMO.
cheers pete! it was a spicy one for sure but pleased i found it
With all the cold calling 3 bets I am wondering if soon we will see a bag of skittles used as an RNG!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
In last hand, reg getting ~2:1 so need ~33% equity. Assuming BU puts in all PPs, AKo-ATo and suited Ax-Qx then BU only has ~25% which would make it a fold. You could assume BU puts it in wider but its close nonetheless
yeah it felt suuuuper close to me too. thanks!
Gonna try out this 10% turn bet play, I hate having to checkfold equity on the turn on cards that are bad for me, this feels like a cool exploit :)
it's quite an interesting line to experiment with! keep me posted
i can not believe the 87 from villain has any real percentage of being a correct play, his equity is dead against so many things .
yeah i think you're right!
87s hand is interesting! Should that hand still be opening pre-flop, given the dynamic with a maniac-type fish OTB and a good aggressive reg in the BB? I think I like the play post-flop.
hmmm i think calling pre is OK given how erratic the rec is. but you may be right that there are some horrible reverse implied odds going on
@@BenaBadBeatPoker what I meant was should 87s fold pre and not even RFI? Marginal open from HJ anyway, and then you have the maniac on the button who will be doing lots of calling and 3betting (and not to mention you in the BB as well).
ah I think you gotta vpip pure due to rec being so rec haha.
@@BenaBadBeatPokerthat makes sense too i guess lol
In the last 55 hand I think the call of the reg with an oesd and a backdoor flush draw is close but ok. His open ended straight draw to the nuts plus his backdoor flush draw should give him slightly above average equity. Even when considering that you may have a set which diminishes his equity because of your redraw he still should have close to 30% equity. That's enough to call $850 for a $3000 pot. Without the backdoor flush draw I think it would have been not enough.
good breakdown, thanks mate!
Holy hell KICKER PROBLEM AJo how tragic lmao
the kickerest of problems 💀💀💀
Even though it was clearly gonna be a 3-way all-in spot, the guy calling with 87ss definitely had some gamble in him XDDD. I personally would not call cuz best case scenario I would have just about the right odds to call, which happened to be the case this time though.
yeah i also would fold but you gotta respect the sheer heart of it :D
The 78 hand is a degen shove gamble
sometimes gotta gamble it up???
Amazing !! - Lets Go!
legoooo
10s v Jacks hand he has to be value shoving. It would be a tragically stupid bluff in my mind.
hahaha both seem pretty tragic though no?!
@@BenaBadBeatPokervalue shove is pretty dumb. But it at least makes sense if he thinks you exclusively have thin value that won’t believe his jam. I can’t understand how bluffing makes any sense when he has soooo much show down value. 🤔🤔
true!
I literally cannot figure out if the 1010 hand is for value... merge, I guess?
🤣still unsure myself
The tens shove is horrendous.
haha fair fair
First AJo hand would go straight to Gringotts vault no questions asked.
LOOOOOOL
If we're assuming the rec shoves full range he gets like 3.5/1 on the call with 8 clean outs twice with a backdoor flushdraw. I think with 29% equity aginst top of range its probably fine ish. But very marginal spot in my opinion.
totally agree very marginal. ty!
78 w/ bdfd needs 30.2% to call. if you have a set he has 28%. if you have two pair he has 36.5% (assuming fish has overpairs or misc overcards that dont block his outs often). The call is winning if fish always calls. If fishie starts to fold it is certainly not so good though.
thanks for the numbers! does this account for redraws tho haha
@@BenaBadBeatPoker Yes, it does account for the sets redraw boat outs. The only real disaster here is if fishie has a flush draw and you have a set (because then 2 of his straight outs are dead and he has to fade all the board pairs). In that situation he only has 17%.
The fact best case its slightly winning, and worst case its hugely losing actually makes me think its a fold the more I think of it.
yeah think you’re right!
Hey Bena, wondering why you don’t battle on global? games r decently soft there
I’m not allowed to play global in Aus!
TT is def a value shove
yeah it could well be. if it is, what do you think of it?
78 is def fine with 1k dead money in there also.
🙏🙏
Fish over bluff in that line but they also have all those random pocket pairs that will shove river randomly so I think jamming yourself rather than going for a xc will be better in that spot. I think you’re just going to lose to random pairs too much when you xc
hmmm not sure I feel strongly that that could be true. I could also make the same argument that I don’t think this player profile folds those pp on the river vs shove! I would say it’s much more likely they bluff ip than they fold pp’s but I’m obv estimating with no evidence hahs
on the JJs vs 10s vs the agro reg, he probably thinks you see him as agro and might hero call a lot vs his shove, hence why he value shoves 10s.
but yeah weird is that what can you have besides a random 9? you wouldnt block ak for value right? if you would his play could be genius imo
nope I wouldn’t block AK otr and even if I did I’d also never call it off haha. very curious one for sure - not sure what was going on
WP on the AJ hand
nice one mate, cheers!
Call with gutshot - hillarious 😅 Which one of them is a huge whale, remind pls
hahaha which hand was calling with a gutter?? if you mean 87s it was an open ender!
@@BenaBadBeatPoker sorry, thought its was a gutshot. Call with openender on flashdraw board is not hillarios, its just bad
sexy graph! glgl keep it up
❤️❤️
I think the stack off with 87ss is pretty bad. He doesn’t have much invested in the pot. And when he runs into a fd his hand is pretty fucked.
yeah i tend to agree that it should be a fold. maybe on rainbow it's more of a consideration but when i have a hand like T9 fd it's lights out :D
Not a fan of the AJo hand. Stab the flop OOP multiway - is that solver approved? I like the turn 10% bet, but hate the check on river. Agree it’s Kx at best, then it’s a shove? If you don’t think he will fold top pair here, then it’s check/fold?
no doubt it’s allowed to cbet yep but not sure about multi way solves. why would you hate the river check? sure if they shove a king ip then that’s a bit of a problem but I imagine there are infinite more bluffs than Kx value shoves
@@BenaBadBeatPoker the turn bet capped him so I would prefer a river bet. If you were willing to call a shove, then I would prefer to be aggressor
TT was def a valuejam, I kind of think its good considering your line looks extremly 9x heavy.
I’m not convinced still but maybe I’m being results oriented!
9th?
hmm we take the scraps I guess
👽👽👽👽
yeah thumbnail is FULL alien mode this week ahahaha (more than my normal alien vibes obv)
@@BenaBadBeatPoker I'm just posting nonsense for the algo, don't read into it hahaha
me and my wife call each other aliens 🤣
Another banger as usual, and the AJ call was heartbreaking🤣
hahaha confirmed still heartbroken
Thought 1010 was a value shove
yeah I think it may be too!
Id say the 87s is closer to a fold given he doesnt have clean outs on diamond 4x/9x
yeah I think this is the swaying point for me too
3:28 I get your idea here but why not betting something like 285$ then? It accomplish the same thing since I except every Tx to jam vs this size. You take a bit more of his money the times he is checking back OTR
hmmm I dont like betting so much the times they do have a T. especially when I don’t expect them to check back worse hands otr
He might always raise a ten but he'd also always bet it when checked to.
I also might experiment with larger raises in ante games
true
Quick question on coin, how do you get the CHP needed to receive rake back?? I would use your code for signup with max signup bonus if you could help some. Love the videos
hey mate! just click your bankroll > BUY CHP > type some amount of USDT to convert and there you go. on monday's you will be paid your rakeback in CHP so likely won't have to top it up as much the following week. if you have any more questions just message me on discord
@@BenaBadBeatPoker oh nice, they allow to buy in your wallet. Whats your code? Ill use it when i sign up. Thanks
yep exactly it’s all in client - nothing to do with exchanges etc. the link is in the description mate! use code Bena too ❤️🙏
If the read is right they have QJo and maybe 98o preflop and they snap jam AQo then obviously your bluff catch prints.
AJo on Q94T, I think multitabling what is easy to miss about this spot is typically we get to be a bit picky with out turn draws. Eg KT4 you get to turn with AQ AJ J9s QJs plus backdoors plus if turn is like a 6 maybe you have 87 or a 3 maybe you have A5. Here, though, you've got very few bluffs with equity available. You'd rather bet AJ than say JT and the only other bluff is AK. So yeah it just becomes mandatory, but surprisingly easy to miss on what seems like an innocuous board
By the same token feels like you're supposed to jam turn once you do x but always painful when the Nash if for villain to mix folds with top pair top kicker in a 3bp
yeah excellent analysis and I too came to these conclusions after the fact. just difficult when you’re playing 10 tables to figure all that out! although I should totally have identified that turn barrel was the play tbh
as a 2NL reg I fell qualified to pass judgement on your play. that first hand you bot played the river horribly. He more so but another block bet may perform well?
haha all thoughts welcome mate. i don't really know what blocking the river achieves in the AJ hand - can you tell me what you think it does?
@@BenaBadBeatPoker here goes :), from a recreationals point of view after your block on turn your perceived range would be weak Kx small pairs and some QJ, Ax straight draws and flush draws looking for a cheap river, after brick river your opponent IMO is unlikely to raise block though unless they are very strong as he will believe you have K at best or small pair looking for a little value and if does raise you can fold easily, limiting your downside. If they call and win you again have limited your downside. To a recreational a jam looks like you are bluffing on a blank and that is going to lose too often so that is out of the question. But a check opens all sorts of craziness as you now look like you have bricked and given up, and this is where the recreational over bluffs, unfortunately for you he doesn't think he can win enough at showdown to check back but that is recreationals for you, so a block averts this craziness and limits your downside.
As the Wakko says sometimes we bet to deny a bluff, but either way you will profit as overbluffed
interesting perspective mate. I think what we need to appreciate is that our hand does a pretty bad job of making better hands fold. when we check and call we will naturally lose to those value hands that woulda called but we allow hands that would’ve folded to bluff. I would say there is a lot more upside to checking the river but that’s only because of our exact hand. If we had a hand like QJ (no showdown or no ability to check call river) then I’d totally agree that shoving would be the best option. always need to consider where our hand is in our range!
14:50 so the reg need less than 30% eq to make the call profitable , who am i to say it’s bad/good play , but i think it’s ambitious cause you gonna play face up vs the rec. even all your bluffs are fds and he only have 24% vs them , maybe if it wasn’t b/c/r line he could justify stacking off..
absolutely! I’m not sure either so dw 🤣
Thats why I play live. When such monsters as Bena play "just" nl1k and 500nl, what are the odds of you actually reaching high stakes and making really big money online? Compared to live people donking massive amounts of money for free, easy and without really tough fight.
haha well it depends what you class as big money mate! but yep if you can hack the live poker lifestyle (which I can’t) then there is definitely a lot of money to be made!!
@@BenaBadBeatPoker not that much compared to you probably. roughly 70k a year only. its not that bad tho as i only play 6 7 months a year. i only play up to 10 25. not such shark
that’s huge mate! without bbj im doing horrendously this year. but yeah this year hasn’t really been the average year I’d say 🙏
@@BenaBadBeatPoker its only because of the toughness of the games, i am pretty sure. You are at least 2 or 3 levels above me, skill wise, maybe even more. I am just ABC bot focusing on fat value vs whales, tbh
Pause on 4:06 and see his facial reaction . Thank me later
loooooooooool
🤨
tell me more please
i lllllove you BBB!
my good sultan ❤️
The interface for coin poker is trash! 😂
hahaha the ui needs some work but it actually bugs less than gg and acr imo.
I am the winner
❤️❤️❤️
Ahahahahah algorithm first
too damn quick