@@RadiumRecordsHollywood brother have you ever tried SSG Audio Optimus? Like no one has videos on it. Made some of my tracks sound amazing and have been waiting for reviewers feedback...
Big fan of this plug-in BUT, let's not forget your mixes are always on point as well! Definitely allows Master Plan to do its thing. Appreciate the walkthrough
Yeah, love the MasterPlan Magic. My thinking process with all this: If I know the mastering people on a personal level (I don't) , have worked with them and if they knew what kind of stuff I would throw at them on a regular basis, I'm sure they would be able to really, really fine-tune a track, but just sending a song / album to a master house, adding one or two sentences with what matters most to me....well, still doing that, but as I learn more (thank you for making this a great tutorial of MasterPlan ;) I will go the alternative route exclusively - soon.
I'm so jealous of your high vocal harmonies BD. Thanks for the MP demo. Do you ever go on podcasts? It would be interesting to hear an interview. Please keep the videos coming
haha, thanks man! I've done some podcasts in the past... I actually ran a podcast that I did over 110 episodes of called "the Radium podcast", you can check that out!
I preferred A, barely and likely just a matter of taste. I liked the thickness of the low mids in A but I think they were a little too much - yet are a little too thin in B. Using Master Plan and keeping your low eq and/or bumping thickness would probably make me pretty happy there. I also felt B had a little sharper transient attack - something I’d probably use the tape feature on but slider mostly to the left (tight). I own Master Plan and use it often, it is a great tool! Both masters sounded great, and the song itself is good stuff too! Well done bro
A is more focused and more punch. B more exciting and modern sounding mostly because you brought up the sides. Sides are easy to bring up, so would be interesting to compare them with the same width.
Thanks for this, I love that tune. Honestly it was Master A for me, I felt it had more glue and the bass was sitting better to my ears. Played it again and I thought B was better, how helpful am I?
I kind of preferred the B version, the higher end frequencies had a bit better clarity, it seemed like some of the A version high frequencies were starting to very slightly fight for some of that headroom. If this came on the radio, I probably would have been listening as critically and would have found either version fine.
I preferred A , nicer lows/mids, B sounded a bit lacking in lows/mids and a bit bright , could be a matter of taste in music though , i love dark stuff lol , but both sounded great, and for some one mastering there own tracks at home then something like Master plan is a great option.
Master B sounds better but has some slight harsh, metallic sound, it's probably Master Plan. That's what I don't like about it, Exonic Ai Master is similar, sounds fantastic but there is some metallic sound that it introduces that I hate. Slate FG-X 2 still rules the roost IMO, followed by Ozone.
A is paid master when you play Verse section is very clean ... But In chorus for me hard to understand.... Thank you for your videos bro ...... I have reqst can you make a video how to master a song meaning the metering things lufs and the number things is very confusing for me .... When I upload my master audio on any social media it' ll distorted and became very dynamic less.... Can you help me
Yea, I'm pretty careful with that 2k-4k area... But I also like that area for clarity in a mix. I don't know if you know who Bob Horn is, but most his mixes have that clarity in the 2k area. It's all preference.
Master A sound slightly better than Master B. Master A lets the transients slap a tad harder. (Yes I know Master B is Master Plan 1.5) MusikHack's other plugin FUEL in conjunction with MasterPlan would have tied or surpassed Master A.
"So what can you learn from this...." That some day in the near future we'll all be ok with having sex with robots... Thank you for the video Bradley. Great comparison, great video as always. PS- this will sound absurd, but.... on mix B, monitored on a phone held sideways, the horn and flute flourishes in the track extended to give a binaural effect.....it was literally extended placement hard L/R and slightly behind.... it was very very cool...
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Great question. I thought the low end was a little too bumpy on the other version, and that B was a tad more balanced and smooth in the highs, although I would have dialed back that mid band .5db. Overall though I preferred the overall balance, lows, and high end of B (again, I'd dial back that mid band a tad though).
You should have spent time trying to match or best the $300 job, instead of winging it out on master plan, because your ears obviously prefer a fatter duller sound. That may be the fault of your monitors, or really what your ears prefer.
After watching and now pausing I chose master B as the analog high end Grammy award winning master and…I was wrong. Now I gotta hear this in the studio and I’ll update my findings but on my tv B was just a bigger sounding record. Great job and thank god I’ve got master plan 1.5 😮💨🫡
Pre-Save "Call Me OTW" here: distrokid.com/hyperfollow/bradleydenniston/call-me-otw
Master A. No pumping, no distortion.
Dude - the MasterPlan sounds better to my ears, and I mean WAY better. Clearer, tighter - much more impact.
Absolutely INSANE that it even compares imo…
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Oh - it more than compares. This is a pro piece of kit IMHO.
@@dutnakke Real talk. Highly impressive no doubt
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood brother have you ever tried SSG Audio Optimus? Like no one has videos on it. Made some of my tracks sound amazing and have been waiting for reviewers feedback...
Big fan of this plug-in BUT, let's not forget your mixes are always on point as well! Definitely allows Master Plan to do its thing. Appreciate the walkthrough
Wow insane plugin! And great demo thanks man. Definitely gonna grab this one
I preferred B. They both sound great and I'd be happy with either. It's insane what some of these new plugins are capable of.
Yeah, love the MasterPlan Magic. My thinking process with all this: If I know the mastering people on a personal level (I don't) , have worked with them and if they knew what kind of stuff I would throw at them on a regular basis, I'm sure they would be able to really, really fine-tune a track, but just sending a song / album to a master house, adding one or two sentences with what matters most to me....well, still doing that, but as I learn more (thank you for making this a great tutorial of MasterPlan ;) I will go the alternative route exclusively - soon.
Yea, I mean… to be fair, I’ve been mastering for a while now (not multi-Grammy winning) but yea. Z
Love this review it actually convinced me to buy the plug-in
Master A sounded more warm (analog) Master B sounded more open and less low end ( you did that ) LOL
I'm so jealous of your high vocal harmonies BD. Thanks for the MP demo. Do you ever go on podcasts? It would be interesting to hear an interview. Please keep the videos coming
haha, thanks man! I've done some podcasts in the past... I actually ran a podcast that I did over 110 episodes of called "the Radium podcast", you can check that out!
I preferred A, barely and likely just a matter of taste. I liked the thickness of the low mids in A but I think they were a little too much - yet are a little too thin in B. Using Master Plan and keeping your low eq and/or bumping thickness would probably make me pretty happy there. I also felt B had a little sharper transient attack - something I’d probably use the tape feature on but slider mostly to the left (tight). I own Master Plan and use it often, it is a great tool! Both masters sounded great, and the song itself is good stuff too! Well done bro
Nice breakdown man!
yea A as more cleam mids i can ear more stuff in A.
First thing....that song is hooky af 👏👏 But ya....B Masterplan. What a time to be a musician!
Yo! Appreciate that fully, song dropping in a couple weeks here!
Hit that pre-save famo: distrokid.com/hyperfollow/bradleydenniston/call-me-otw
A is more focused and more punch. B more exciting and modern sounding mostly because you brought up the sides. Sides are easy to bring up, so would be interesting to compare them with the same width.
@@EricLumiereMusic bringing up the sides is only part of it…
Love the Batman intro!
Let’s go!! 🦇
Such a groovy track ha, nice work on this master. Master Plan is a phenomenal plugin.
Thank you fam! Yes, it’s been a great tool for sure 💯
Thanks for this, I love that tune. Honestly it was Master A for me, I felt it had more glue and the bass was sitting better to my ears. Played it again and I thought B was better, how helpful am I?
B is definitely my vibe!😍
Same fam! Other one is just too boomy and congested for me
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Agreed !😌
I love this plugin since I first used It 🧡
So solid
I kind of preferred the B version, the higher end frequencies had a bit better clarity, it seemed like some of the A version high frequencies were starting to very slightly fight for some of that headroom. If this came on the radio, I probably would have been listening as critically and would have found either version fine.
A warmer and deeper, B cleaner and thinner
Would you compare Master Plan and it's best rival Maserati GRP?
Wow! MP 1.5
KILLER update 🔥🔥
A,, better balance overall ,,
Master B sounds much cleaner to me. I can feel the separation between the elements.
Sounds the best to me.
Just wowwww!!!
I liked Master B best! Thank you for this review. ✨
Master A. It's Just more natural to my Ears the Analog
What if I told you Master A is fully digital?
I have a really hard time hearing the tiny, tiny, differences. What is the best way to train that?
Same here
Possibly better headphones
I preferred A , nicer lows/mids, B sounded a bit lacking in lows/mids and a bit bright , could be a matter of taste in music though , i love dark stuff lol , but both sounded great, and for some one mastering there own tracks at home then something like Master plan is a great option.
It's definitely a matter of preference in a lot of cases... 100
Master B sounds better but has some slight harsh, metallic sound, it's probably Master Plan. That's what I don't like about it, Exonic Ai Master is similar, sounds fantastic but there is some metallic sound that it introduces that I hate. Slate FG-X 2 still rules the roost IMO, followed by Ozone.
A is paid master when you play Verse section is very clean ... But In chorus for me hard to understand.... Thank you for your videos bro ...... I have reqst can you make a video how to master a song meaning the metering things lufs and the number things is very confusing for me .... When I upload my master audio on any social media it' ll distorted and became very dynamic less.... Can you help me
Nice! I’ll definitely consider it
Master A 👍🏽
So cool
I might be alone on this, but I preferred A.
Master B sounds a bit sharper to me. I would not really care though, as the both sound good.
I have to agree with you here, they both sound dope. Very hard for me to pick the one I want to upload to distro
Master B has more character or presence to it and Master A has more low end punch . I prefer yours
Master A sounds more professionally mastered, clean, balanced, and really radio ready! 🔥💯
That’s the one that out on all platforms!
Master B sounded wider and I'm not too sure the song called for that. I choose A now I unpause
Master A is better to my ears. It's less harsh, fuller and more natural sounding.
I preferred Master B sounded more open vocals sounded great
B,. Everything pops more
Crazy huh??
Dude I feel a deep need to call you on a two way line.
Just don't you DARE call me on a 3-way line...
2:08 that sounds kaputt to me
A sounds better especially in the chorus. It doesnt sound as tinny in the 2-4k range especially noticeably if u listen on phone
Yea, I'm pretty careful with that 2k-4k area... But I also like that area for clarity in a mix. I don't know if you know who Bob Horn is, but most his mixes have that clarity in the 2k area. It's all preference.
I personally think b sounds a bit over saturated but I’m sure that is to your taste. The engineer’s sounded a bit more spread out and clean imo.
A sounds good on mobile phone
both sound good but A suond more focus 100%
I like b bc it’s big and still airy
Yea!!
A is way better to me. B is harsher, flatter, too bright. Not a knock on the plugin, there are probably settings that would help it fare better.
Master B sounds more together and full. I’m voting for master B
master B's low end/low mid are clearer and tighter. I prefer B. God damn..
Craaaazy huh?
nice music
B has more clarity and bite... A has a touch of muddinesss. Prefer B but I'd make it slightly warmer.
Preferred master A. Just sounded smoother and less hyped.
@@edmcguire4926 to me the “smoother and less hyped” can also sound “flat and less exciting”
Master A sound slightly better than Master B. Master A lets the transients slap a tad harder. (Yes I know Master B is Master Plan 1.5)
MusikHack's other plugin FUEL in conjunction with MasterPlan would have tied or surpassed Master A.
B=a bit louder and fuller sounding to my ears.
That’s what’s up
If price is an issue, 90% of music listeners are layman
Master B is more defined to me!
I prefer B😮😮. The engineer used Master Plan too😂😂😂
lmao... Nah, he has like $500k in analog outboard!
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood 😵💫😵💫😵💫
@@elcantantejr1wild… I know
master B i like
"So what can you learn from this...."
That some day in the near future we'll all be ok with having sex with robots...
Thank you for the video Bradley. Great comparison, great video as always.
PS- this will sound absurd, but.... on mix B, monitored on a phone held sideways, the horn and flute flourishes in the track extended to give a binaural effect.....it was literally extended placement hard L/R and slightly behind.... it was very very cool...
Lmao!! So… Not ALL of us… Sinner..
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood cmon yo, of course I meant everybody else.... but me.... obviously :)
@@druhawks Excluding present company... Of course!
bro master B sounds 10x better made the song way more hype
A is better. tamed and controlled vibes for me. on B there is obvious harshness.
A sounds not open. B HAS CLARITY AND MORE WIDER
A is better and solid overall, the B is airy and not that solid in my ears but music is subjective
B sounds a touch better!
i like master B better, Master A sounds a little bit Dark and blanketed
Master B
master A sounds more open
🤔 What are you listening on?
A sounded better to me, chose it before the reveal
master B us the better one
Master A for sure - sounds less synthetic than B
🤔
master b got more depth
B
Prefer B.
Nice! Why though?
@@RadiumRecordsHollywood Great question. I thought the low end was a little too bumpy on the other version, and that B was a tad more balanced and smooth in the highs, although I would have dialed back that mid band .5db. Overall though I preferred the overall balance, lows, and high end of B (again, I'd dial back that mid band a tad though).
Master B 😂
Do we have to call it master b? Let’s say master 1 and 2. Stop saying master b.
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
My mom is better.
Ain’t that the truth! 😍
You should have spent time trying to match or best the $300 job, instead of winging it out on master plan, because your ears obviously prefer a fatter duller sound.
That may be the fault of your monitors, or really what your ears prefer.
I think you got this opposite…
After watching and now pausing I chose master B as the analog high end Grammy award winning master and…I was wrong. Now I gotta hear this in the studio and I’ll update my findings but on my tv B was just a bigger sounding record. Great job and thank god I’ve got master plan 1.5 😮💨🫡
Master B