2.3 EcoBoost: The Details You Should Know

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 344

  • @jonathanpries2937
    @jonathanpries2937 Рік тому +10

    I absolutely love our 2.3. No oil pump BELT, and a canisters oil filter. Rather than a cartridge 2.7. Style

    • @cymerus2
      @cymerus2 6 місяців тому +1

      For those who are looking for the belt info, 2.3 ecoboost has an oil pump chain, not a wet belt (rubber belt) so it shouldn't cause those types of problems. However, 2.7 DOES have a wet belt (rubber belt) so that's a bizarre choice on Ford's part.

    • @neiljustinealmenor8854
      @neiljustinealmenor8854 3 місяці тому

      does this engine of yours used also on bronco 2.3l?

  • @amaksimchuk
    @amaksimchuk 2 роки тому +5

    My Toyota Aristo with a twin turbo inline 6 cylinder 2jz-gte (3 liter) from 1993 has oil squirters at the bottom of the block. Happy to also have a 2021 Ranger Tremor with the inline 4 2.3l twin-scroll. Great truck and a fantastically torque-y engine.

  • @jimmyr419
    @jimmyr419 2 роки тому +12

    Super cool review. I have a 21 ranger. I love it. Its so quick. So much fun to drive!

  • @Vidishish
    @Vidishish 2 роки тому +9

    Thank you I’m now confident in my 2.3 choice for my 2d Bronco.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      You’re welcome! It truly is a good engine you’re gonna be happy with it 🤠 in my opinion

  • @mark5862
    @mark5862 2 роки тому +8

    I had the twin plug 2.3 in a Ranger. Absolutely bullet proof engine. Something to be said for simplicity.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      Agreed. Those engines were among my favorite.
      Thanks for watching 👍

    • @billyboy4797
      @billyboy4797 2 роки тому +4

      The Ford 4.9L Strait 6 was the bullet proof engine on a whole other level. Too bad they they stopped making it.

    • @mark5862
      @mark5862 2 роки тому

      @@billyboy4797 I like straight sixes. When I was in college I had an early seventies AMC Hornet. Like most AMCs the body wasn't great but it had a fantastic straight 6 and its 3-speed auto tranny worked well too, never had any issues. It was pretty quick too, would peel out of you punched it. I believe the drivetrain was of GM origin. GM made come crap over the years, but they have also made some of the best drivetrains around.

  • @rjdavis7503
    @rjdavis7503 17 днів тому +1

    Really enjoy my 20 Ranger. Have modified it and have quite a bit of get up and go!
    The 10 speed tranny shifts smoothly too.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  17 днів тому

      @@rjdavis7503 awesome to hear. I don’t own one but a friend has a bronco with a 2.3 and it’s very impressive.

  • @niceguydmm
    @niceguydmm 2 роки тому +12

    I have the 2020 2.3 in a Ranger. I had heart burn going from a 5.3 V8 to a 2.3 pulling my boat but this 2.3 pulls the boat great and maybe better since it not as heavy of a truck. I still have a 2000 Ranger and couldn't resist the new one. I installed a catch can and change oil every 3K with Mobile1. Its just what I do. What is everyone doing to clean the GDI system? The catch can has some in it but very little. I hear Ford did something to help with a built in separator. GREAT VIDEO!!

    • @Davido50
      @Davido50 8 місяців тому +1

      Use Top Tier rated fuels only. Google top tier rated gas station brands. Run a good *full synthetic engine oil* & change every 5k mis MAX. Motorcraft filters always. Ford hasn't had carbon issues in there GTDI engines like other manufacturers. Wouldn't worry bout it. Gen2- 2.3L GTDI Ecoboost was named top5 best 4cyl engines in the world. Huge accolade. In fact gen2 - 2.0L/2.3L/ 2.7L/ 3.5L all excellent. Can't beat em!

  • @mattbeharry
    @mattbeharry 2 роки тому +4

    Just picked up my Bronco on Friday. 2dr 2.3l black diamond. It’s awesome. Very happy w the engine thus far, plenty of pep and feels great to me. Really happy w my choice

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      Congratulations! These Broncos are awesome

    • @iamroblesonyt
      @iamroblesonyt 9 місяців тому +1

      I've got 60k miles on mine. Same everything with the stick. Only mods so far is the flowmaster outlaw exhaust and it sounds insane bc it growls a bit more to push the 35's off 1'st gear 🛻💨

    • @mattbeharry
      @mattbeharry 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@iamroblesonyt 2 years on, still loving mine. no issues at all. have about 16k miles on mine only as I work from home, but still really enjoying it. I looked into the flowmaster as well, nice to hear your experience has been good w it. might be in my future as well!

    • @dagothodros641
      @dagothodros641 3 місяці тому

      Expect it to break down like Ford's do. Jeep will last while Ford break down.

  • @ddgish
    @ddgish 8 місяців тому +2

    This is a really great video. I'm an engineer and a gearhead. I have already picked out the Bronco I want to buy and this put my mind to ease with several of my questions. Thank you.

  • @resharddurdley6987
    @resharddurdley6987 3 роки тому +11

    Excellent info. I just brought my wife a 21 Explorer Timberline with a 2.3. I am extremely impressed with the low to mid range power, this Timberline really takes off and goes! I am assuming it's the same engine as the bronco??. In the explorer it's 300/310 torque with 91 octane I believe.
    Dealer, at my request,, put in Amsoil 5w30ss , amsoil transfer case , amsoil front/rear differential.
    We are also using Archoil ar6200 fuel additive .

  • @Haulass95gt
    @Haulass95gt 2 роки тому +3

    I have a full built on '18 Eco Mustang that I make over 400 wheel and 500 ft/lbs for over 60k miles just taking care of it doing standard maintenance, never had an issue.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +2

      Awesome! Good to hear. I really like the 2.3, so much upside with aftermarket as well

  • @petergradilone4784
    @petergradilone4784 3 роки тому +12

    Very helpful and informative review. I have a 2.3 Bronco on order, but was second guessing my engine choice, not knowing much about it, until I saw this video. Excellent tuitional on the 2.3. Thanks for the peace of mind!

  • @stevesguns
    @stevesguns 2 роки тому +3

    I love my 2.3L 7 speed.. i have the JB4, knn cold air , knn charge pipes and blow off with E50 blend. that thing smokes v6 branco all day

  • @megga118
    @megga118 2 роки тому +8

    I have a 21 Ranger with the 2.3l, thanks for the good info 👍

  • @ProjectFairmont
    @ProjectFairmont 2 місяці тому

    I have a ‘15 EB PP Mustang I bought new. It’s been a daily including WI winters and now set up for open track. It’s a solid and efficient engine, as is the entire drivetrain. Changes made for track duty include an upgraded intercooler and added an oil cooler, as it suffers from heat soak after so many laps. Change the oil, periodically replace the low side fuel pressure sensor and add an oil separator and the 2.3 EB will treat you well . Oh yea I have 2.3 7M Bronco on order. ❤

  • @mkbmj
    @mkbmj 3 роки тому +3

    My first order was a 2Dr Wildtrack with 2.7. I did not get a 2021 build date and was converted to a 2022. After seeing the videos on the various trims and what you really get for $55K Vice $38K I decided to save a few bucks. When I went to re-confirm my order I changed to a Black Diamond 2 Dr with the 2.3L. I’m not a big off-roader but I need 4WD for snow and beach. I’ll remove the crash bars, add 17x9” wheels and 33x12.50 Nitto Ridge Grapplers and see how things go. Hopefully the little 4 does me a solid.

  • @javiermarante5344
    @javiermarante5344 2 роки тому +52

    I actually have a 2021 ranger with the 2.3l and at first I was kinda regretting it bc of the bad reputation the first gen 2.3l on the focus rs had blowing head gaskets but after doing some research I found out that Ford revised this engine and made it somewhat “BULLETPROOF”

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +16

      Agreed. You have a good engine in that Ranger 👍

    • @javiermarante5344
      @javiermarante5344 2 роки тому +14

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors thank you sir! Glad I made the right choice, and now working at a Ford dealership I am even happier bc I don’t see any 2.3l go in for repairs

    • @bryan70546
      @bryan70546 2 роки тому +12

      I just picked up a 22 ranger with the 2.3, the car I traded in on it was a 485hp 21 charger. I got to admit the little ranger rips. so far, I'm loving it. especially the MPGs.

    • @Heiserton
      @Heiserton 2 роки тому +4

      That was due to a factory assembly error they were using the wrong gaskets, which was fixed shortly after.

    • @simbyote8755
      @simbyote8755 2 роки тому +3

      I have the Ranger also; very cool truck. Been modding it and getting some good results. Contrary to popular opinion we also have a very good trans in the 10R80.

  • @lynch42
    @lynch42 2 роки тому +2

    Good thing I'm doing my research on these engines. I am building my bronco and hopefully next year I'll have it.

  • @ad8881
    @ad8881 9 місяців тому +1

    I have the 2.7 ecoboost in an F150 it drives great. I get 26 mpg lifetime average after 35k miles 500 boat towing. I was surprised the bronco gets less with the smaller 2.3.

  • @BarryMDHo
    @BarryMDHo 2 роки тому +4

    Fantastic description of 2.3 4 cyl motor in the Bronco! Very informative and helpful. Thank you!

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you for watching!

    • @BarryMDHo
      @BarryMDHo 2 роки тому

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors I meant to ask, I'm considering adding power programming to my Bronco's 2.3 adding 30-60 hp depending on vendor. Thoughs?

  • @jsutty7530
    @jsutty7530 3 роки тому +5

    cummins diesel engines use piston cooling nozzles in the block under the pistons to cool…have for a long long time

  • @jrdorcak1478
    @jrdorcak1478 29 днів тому

    Great 3.2 ecoboost engine explained. Any advice on minimizing carbon build up. Just got a 2024 Ranger XLT FX4 4X4 with 3.2 ecoboost. Just love it. Soo many opinions on carbon build up etc...
    Great listening to someone who knows what he's talking about.
    JR

  • @cjfazio3012
    @cjfazio3012 4 місяці тому +2

    Enjoyed the video. I was worried about my 2.3 and the longevity of it. I spent a pretty penny on my bronco and want it to last! First vehicle I own with a turbo so looking up all the information on it that I can obtain!!

  • @Deerslayer369
    @Deerslayer369 Рік тому +2

    Great video and very informative! I just purchased a 2022 Explorer Timberline with the 2.3. Plenty of power and very smooth.

  • @garygurniak7156
    @garygurniak7156 Місяць тому +1

    Great video on the 2.3 I only use amsoil signature series full synthetic 5w30👍

  • @BarryMDHo
    @BarryMDHo 2 роки тому +3

    Great detail! Thx! Just got my Black Diamond Sasquatch 2.3, 4 dr., and very impressed with the 2.3 power. My '21 F150 Ltd Powerboost has 430/570 hp/tq so used to lots of power. May even add a power pack upgrade for another 40 hp or so. Thanks.

  • @bigseff23
    @bigseff23 2 роки тому +4

    Actually a lot of motorcycle engines starting in the '80s have piston oil jets that spray a mist of oil underneath there to keep them cool. Because when you're at 10k to 12k RPMs that build up a lot of heat

  • @MudMonsterRacing4
    @MudMonsterRacing4 3 роки тому +19

    Great video. Seems like both engines are great options. I drove a 2.3 bronco in a sasquatch and non sasquatch. If we were getting the sasquatch package I would go with the 2.7 but the non sasquatch was surprisingly quick with the 2.3. The 2.3 was adequate for the sasquatch bronco but I think it needs that extra torque. It got up to speed fine, but it just didn't feel like the non sasquatch. We're going black diamond 2.3 auto non sasquatch.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +2

      Thanks for watching! If you want maximum torque than the 2.7 is your selection.

    • @MudMonsterRacing4
      @MudMonsterRacing4 3 роки тому +5

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors Were good with the 2.3 and the 32 inch tires on the non sasquatch . Plenty of power.

    • @JohnDoe-ks4id
      @JohnDoe-ks4id Рік тому +1

      I’m getting the same thing. Manual transmission.

    • @MudMonsterRacing4
      @MudMonsterRacing4 Рік тому +2

      @John Doe we ended up with a 2.7 non sasquatch black diamond 😆

    • @JohnDoe-ks4id
      @JohnDoe-ks4id Рік тому +1

      @@MudMonsterRacing4 hopefully we like the black diamond 2.3. I ordered it in green. All research indicates that the 2.3 is very good.

  • @k_neil
    @k_neil 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you. I can sleep ok now with my 2.3 order

  • @leonardootero7719
    @leonardootero7719 6 місяців тому +3

    Thank you so much. That really helps you have a great channel. And I'll support you however I can.!!

  • @davevisse
    @davevisse 2 роки тому +9

    Impressive overview. Learned a lot. Thanks for making it. Looking forward to my 2dr Badlands luxe Squatch 6spd. I was a bit nervous on the 2.3, not now.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      Awesome! Thanks for watching!

    • @FloridaDeere
      @FloridaDeere 2 роки тому +2

      I have a 2.3L 6 speed Badlands as well, awesome truck, awesome motor.

  • @bruth6138
    @bruth6138 2 роки тому +4

    The new 2.3 is a great motor. Not super complicated. Pretty good power and the valves dont appear to be crumbling like the 2.7.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      The 2.7 has a limited amount of failures compared to total produced. I have 2 with no issues and don’t expect any. I do like the 2.3 a lot. Don’t forget in the mustang it had a short issues with head gaskets early on that they resolved.
      Thank you for watching our channel 👍

    • @Fin.mint.
      @Fin.mint. 2 місяці тому

      ​@@DrivenWildOutdoorsThe 2.3 Ecoboost in the mustang is a different engine, and has been discontinued. Now the 2.3 from the RS( used now in the Ranger/Bronco) is the only one produced.

  • @goldiewulf
    @goldiewulf 7 місяців тому +1

    21 2 door with the 2.3 L in manual is dangerously fun

  • @parkerrichard1091
    @parkerrichard1091 2 місяці тому

    Oil change very important with small oil filter. The oil gets dirty very quickly, even with the large amount of oil used.

  • @blackericdenice
    @blackericdenice 2 роки тому +2

    I had a 89 2.3 Mustang and it was a great low 88 hp engine. It should have made 110 hp.

  • @jamescaldwell5
    @jamescaldwell5 Рік тому +1

    Great video. I have a 2.3 Bronco. I’m looking for the video you mentioned about properly maintaining a turbo engine.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  Рік тому +1

      Thank you for watching!
      Here is the Turbo Etiquette video. ua-cam.com/video/aeVh0zVYXPc/v-deo.html

  • @PureCountryof91
    @PureCountryof91 2 роки тому +2

    Lima can be found all the way to 2000, in rangers. In 01, the duratec had all but replaced it. The duratec had plenty of problems in the ranger due to poor maintenance, leading to timing chain failure and subsequently requiring replacement of the whole engine.

  • @richardsnyder3900
    @richardsnyder3900 2 роки тому +1

    I installed the factory tuner it adds 45 hp and 60 pound-feet torque and does not void warranty if installed by dealer. You will need to run 93 octane but my intown mileage went from 17 mpg to 22.5 except when my foot gets heavy. I live in Florida so most of driving is done on flat land.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      Awesome! Can you keep us posted and let us know how it continues to perform and if any extra maintenance long term?

    • @TomRupp
      @TomRupp Рік тому

      How has factory tuner been?

    • @ufbeeker
      @ufbeeker 9 місяців тому

      Could you give some details on the factory tuner?

  • @patriciogarza6370
    @patriciogarza6370 2 роки тому +4

    I bought a Base 4Dr Non Sas with a 2.3 Power Plant, this engine can definitely handles the 33s tires with steelies like a champ, I wonder if using 94 oct fuel will increase my mpg, but yeah I don’t regret it at all, great video! Learned great information on these engines 🙌

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you! If Ford says you can then you sure could try it. All I run is 93 octane in my 2.7

  • @leonardootero7719
    @leonardootero7719 6 місяців тому +2

    Great video. Great info. Question is this the same engine in the Ford Ranger? I believe italso how to these 10 speed transmissions hold up in the Ford Ranger.? Thank you

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  6 місяців тому

      Yes, same engine unless there has been some updates for 24 that’s not published. As far as I know the 10r60 is a good transmission at least in my experience owning two of them I have not had any issues

  • @cy9nvs
    @cy9nvs 2 роки тому +9

    Very interesting video, got a Focus ST with the 2.3 Ecoboost.
    Been holding off for a while thinking it's a problematic engine due to the head gasket issues that plagued the Focus RS, but from what I understand that was an issue exclusive to early models of that specific car only. Been hearing a lot of good things about it other than that, people get crazy performance out of them with software and very little hardware upgrades to the exhaust system and cooling.

    • @davidholt7126
      @davidholt7126 2 роки тому +2

      The ST has a 2.0 ecoboost, not a 2.3.

    • @cy9nvs
      @cy9nvs 2 роки тому +2

      @@davidholt7126 well that kind of weird because my new 2022 model with 280 hp happens to have the 2.3l engine..

    • @Kevin93til
      @Kevin93til 2 роки тому

      @@cy9nvs what county are you in? The Focus was discontinued in North America for the current generation.

    • @cy9nvs
      @cy9nvs 2 роки тому +3

      @@Kevin93til I'm in germany. In Europe, Asia and Australia there's a 4th gen, and the ST has the 2.3L Ecoboost.

  • @sinepari9160
    @sinepari9160 3 місяці тому +1

    You broke this down better than a Ford engineer 👊

  • @kookie389
    @kookie389 2 роки тому +6

    Just purchased a 2021 big bend with the 2.3 L and this video is amazing, thank you for taking the time to break down this engine! Could you recommend what oil and fuel type you would use for the 2.3 L engine that would be awesome, thank you!!

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      Ford Recommends 5w-30 synthetic blend. I would stick to their recommendations. I will be changing our oil every 4 to 5 k miles.

    • @INVERTEDBUKAKI
      @INVERTEDBUKAKI 2 роки тому +1

      I'm sorry but that was the only bad thing about the bronco. Walk in the dealer. Excuse me sir, may I get the Big Bend me over package?

  • @walterlynch4820
    @walterlynch4820 3 роки тому +2

    Love your videos. I say the 2.7L discussion last week...which is what I am getting in my Bronco build. I am definitely following you. I enjoy hearing any expert speak on their expertise and this is an area I am very interested in.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому

      Thank you for the kind words! Thank you for watching, we have a lot more to come 👍

  • @RSDX99
    @RSDX99 3 роки тому +6

    Great info about my engine. I traded my F150 Coyote ( more garage room) for a Ranger 2.3 and just by the seat of the pants, the Ranger feels just as quick as the F150. I anticipate ordering a Bronco soon and have been thinking about which engine to choose and your information has convinced me to stay with the 2.3. BTW I am getting 24MPG with the Ranger so maybe the Bronco will be similar in MPG.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +1

      Awesome! The ranger is definitely a nice truck. Thanks for watching our video there’s more to come 👍

  • @rtkl13
    @rtkl13 2 роки тому +3

    Although that engine is done nicely for sure, the bronco is a pretty girthy vehicle to be powered by an all aluminum foundation in my opinion. Unless of course you play with the gearing. Also having a 1.58 rod ratio creates a little more concern ( piston oiling upgrade is understandable ). Once again for lighter vehicles I think nothing but good but I don't like the idea of using the little engine that could in a big girl like the bronco

  • @TSWest
    @TSWest 2 роки тому +8

    That was a very informative video and much appreciated. I just purchased the 2021 Ranger Tremor and wanted to acquaint myself with it's EB 2.3L Turbo engine. From my pre-purchase research I read that it was a proven and reliable power plant but I would like to know what you recommend for maintaining it at peak performance. I'm getting close to 2400 miles and I've been using the 87 octane fuel (Shell) specified in the manual. I was wondering if I should be using any type of fuel additive, type of oil (synthetic vs blend) and interval (3k vs 5k). The truck is stock with no performance tune. I only ask because clearly you know what you are talking about. Thanks in advance and subbed.

    • @champinsoccer9
      @champinsoccer9 2 роки тому +4

      not sure about additives but i have a 2020 ford ranger and from my research, additives aren't recommended. change the oil 3-5k miles, rear diff and tranny @ 30k then 50k thereafter. same as transfer case and front diff, 50k. i change my oil every 3k miles or below. i also have added a mishimoto catch can for the carbon build up. i watch ford boss me, and ford tech makuloko, and powerstroke tech talk for my ford info. i love my ranger for almost 3 years. i have 22k miles and its a monster

  • @kamryn7496
    @kamryn7496 5 місяців тому +1

    I’m thinking of buying a 2022 2.3L ford ranger XL with only 4800 miles on it I was wondering if these engine are reliable I’m the type of person to keep a vehicle for 150k plus miles I hope it would at least last that long

  • @pullnin
    @pullnin Рік тому +2

    I’ve got a 2.3 in my 2022 Bronco 2 door black Diamond manual. Love the combination. Liked and subscribed 👌looking forward to your tips on longevity with the turbo . My question would be with the Air filter I do a lot of driving in this vehicle both on and off road . Would you recommend a K&N Air filter system if it’s offered ? My fuel mileage is around 18.9 -21 mpg depending on tire pressure . Much better at 47 psi . What can you tell me about the high pressure cooling system and how often should it be flushed ?Thank you in advance for your great information 💪

    • @Persocondes
      @Persocondes Рік тому

      don't get k&n, it's too porous and will let fine dust through and score your bearings.

  • @davedunkelberger7050
    @davedunkelberger7050 2 роки тому

    A lot of people run oil catch cans because it’s direct injection. And they do collect quite a bit of oil

  • @davidhill8437
    @davidhill8437 3 місяці тому +1

    I feel much better about my 2024 Ranger reliability now.

  • @18droc
    @18droc 2 роки тому

    I have a 2.3 and you talked about a video on turbos. Just trying to find that video. Thanks

  • @DUNEATV
    @DUNEATV 3 роки тому +3

    My buddy’s 4cyl eco boost just “windowed” the block driving home from work. Connecting rod blew a hole straight through. Just a fluke I guess…

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +3

      Sorry hear that. Under boost or cruising?

    • @DUNEATV
      @DUNEATV 3 роки тому +3

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors Driving in traffic…approaching a red light here in North Phoenix AZ. The motor is in a Mustang not a Bronco just to be clear…

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +2

      @@DUNEATV there is something called low RPM detonation, in my opinion if a rod broke at low RPMs it would be some sort of preignition detonation issue

    • @DUNEATV
      @DUNEATV 3 роки тому +1

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors Yeah, probably. He said he remembered hearing a rattle at startup about a week before it happened.

  • @travishaskie7879
    @travishaskie7879 5 місяців тому

    2022 bronco outerbanks Sasquatch with 36,000 miles so far. Motor is doing great so far. What kind of mileage can we expect till the motor needs to be replaced?

  • @that1guyonpoint213
    @that1guyonpoint213 3 роки тому +2

    Great video! I know this isn't a bronco engine but you should do a video talking about the 3.5 ecoboost. Very interesting engines.

  • @KevinSweeten-r7i
    @KevinSweeten-r7i Рік тому

    You mention better fuel efficiency with the 2.7 on a Sasquatch machine. How about a 4 door a Black Diamond with plans on adding 33” tires? I currently have a 2.3 on order with no build date.

  • @micahrichey5335
    @micahrichey5335 3 роки тому +2

    I have been anxiously awaiting this video. Your video on the 2.7l was great, this one is too.
    I have a 4-door 2.3l/7MT Badlands Sasquatch on order and I am driving myself crazy. I really want the 7MT but I want to be sure that the 2.3l will be okay for me considering that I anticipate putting it through the ringer. I have 2 kids and live near the mountains so this Bronco will be loaded up and traversing steep grades often. I like the control of the MT but I want enough power. Ford why won’t you let us have the 7MT with the 2.7l?!?!

  • @kevinthibodeaux-watts3188
    @kevinthibodeaux-watts3188 Рік тому +1

    Hello my nameis Kevin and I have a 96 ford ranger it has a 2.3 I believe it is a short block I have been looking into the 2.3 eco boost motor as an upgrade .from some of the forms I have read thus far say that the 2.3 eco boost motor is a long block my question That I have is can the short block 2.3 top end be mounted on the 2.3 long block so I wouldn't have to mess with the electrical from the stock motor or would it be better to find a complete 2.3 eco boost and gut all yhe stock electrical out and hook up the 2.3 eco boost in full or what is your opinion on this project

  • @ammar5878
    @ammar5878 3 роки тому +3

    Can you talk about the 10 speed automatic transmission 10R60. I heard they had a lot of issues

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +3

      Yes, I will be reviewing it on our channel soon.
      Thanks for watching!

  • @vicp2645
    @vicp2645 2 роки тому +3

    Anyone know if there are differences between this 2.3 and the 2.3 in the explorer?

  • @infinityoff-road
    @infinityoff-road 3 місяці тому +1

    Perfect explanation! Thank you

  • @johnranney1708
    @johnranney1708 2 місяці тому

    The upper limit to the 2.3 was the Focus RS. 350 HP

  • @johnmajane3731
    @johnmajane3731 2 роки тому

    I am thinking about a new truck. The 2.3L ecoboost turns me off. To complicated, the milage is not much better then my 4.0 L SOHC in my 2011 Ranger. I get 22 mpg @ 70 mph with it and average 19 mpg. Truly bullet proof, 272,000 miles on it now and it runs fine. Doesn't use an appreciable amount of oil between 5000 mile changes. Going with a Tacoma this time around, still has a nice normally aspirated V6.

  • @samcipparone3637
    @samcipparone3637 2 роки тому +1

    Absolutely outstanding explanation!

  • @williamdkelly
    @williamdkelly Рік тому +1

    Which engine is the best ? The 2.3 or the 2.7?

  • @kirkeric
    @kirkeric 2 роки тому

    I just put a deposit down on a 2.3 for a Big Bend due in in May-Jun. I'm not 100% committed yet and the engine is/was one of the things along with it being a manual and not sure I really want to deal with a manual transmission. This video makes me feel a lot better though. I currently have and have had 4 Runners for years and oddly, the V6 has 270HP and 300 Torque yet a 5k towing capability. This is 300/330 and 3500. I don't think the towing is so much a factor but.....a thought. Appreciate any advice. My key reservation is going from my known reliable 4 runner to a 4 cylinder and a stick.

  • @cameronwingate7477
    @cameronwingate7477 6 місяців тому

    I wonder if you ever mentions if the current 2.3 for 24 and 25 is water cooled as well as oil lubricated

  • @simbyote8755
    @simbyote8755 2 роки тому +1

    Great video; thank you for sharing your knowledge.

  • @laurahunt5146
    @laurahunt5146 5 місяців тому +1

    piston no 1 failed around the skirt the oil control ring broke apart the level of difference that forged pistons and rods have is without a doubt what this engine should of had

  • @erikdahl3171
    @erikdahl3171 2 роки тому +1

    My only complaint is that you can't get the 2.7 with a manual transmission. Jeep did the same on the 392.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      I understand, Ford just doesn’t have a driveline that they’ve paired up with a manual and a 2.7. If they were to offer a manual in the F1 50 with the 2.7 they could justify the R&D and a manual unique for that driveline

    • @micahrichey5335
      @micahrichey5335 2 роки тому

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors I think Ford could sell a lot of manual transmission F-150’s since they would be the only manufacturer with one. Just mentioning this so that maybe Ford will hear it.

  • @michaelbergman6441
    @michaelbergman6441 2 роки тому +1

    Would you purchase the Ford chip upgrade for the 2.3l. significant horse and torque gains. This is the ford approved upgrade. I have a 2022 Ranger.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +1

      If I was looking to grab some more performance out of the engine I absolutely would. As long as it was from Ford 👍

    • @michaelbergman6441
      @michaelbergman6441 2 роки тому +1

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors you will find the approved upgrade on ford accessories I believe.

  • @KennethHarbin-o1w
    @KennethHarbin-o1w 4 місяці тому

    I'm interesed in what you think about the 2.7 v6 in the Ranger XLT? what would be the avg. fuel milage going w/18" wheels? and what about the wet belt on the oil pump, any reports of it being a problem?

  • @ritchiethomas986
    @ritchiethomas986 Рік тому

    I’m planning to get the ‘23 Everest which comes here with a 2.3 Eco-Boost Petrol engine. Can you advise if this would be an under powered engine for the Everest considering the weight about 2-2.5 tons. My drives are on steep hilly roads and I’m not sure how the Everest would perform. Apart from that I love the new Everest

  • @vcc1534
    @vcc1534 2 роки тому +1

    Curious to now how familiar this motor is to the FoMoCo 2.3 liter in the 2007 Mazda Speed 3...

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      The 2.3 ecoboost has lineage to the Mazda L engine. So some similarities are possible

  • @johnsimms818
    @johnsimms818 8 місяців тому

    I had an older ranger with two spark plugs per cylinder with a five speed toughest little truck there is . I'm getting ready to buy a 2019 - 2022 ranger . I keep hearing in the comments about a catch can .what is it , what does it do and why would i need it ? Thanks in advance.

  • @josephdarco8677
    @josephdarco8677 3 роки тому +1

    Great info, thank you! Some visual aides to show parts you are discussing would be even better!

  • @jushoward26
    @jushoward26 2 роки тому +2

    I Help build them at Cleveland engine. Its a great set up powerful and efficient.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      I agree! What an awesome job you have.
      We have been super impressed with them in the mustang and now the Bronco!

  • @jayhawker03
    @jayhawker03 2 роки тому +1

    I wouldn’t say the 2.0 Twin Scroll EB and 2.3 EB are radically different. You can directly bolt on all of the 2.0 accessories to a 2.3 block in all the same places. In a transverse configuration, the 2.0 and 2.3 look completely identical.

  • @howardriggins4010
    @howardriggins4010 2 роки тому +1

    Wow. Impressive knowledge, subscribed

  • @roberte.bennett8327
    @roberte.bennett8327 2 роки тому +1

    When you talked about getting more HP from higher octane gas, were you talking about the 2.7L or 2.3L or both? I've got the 2.3L in my 2021 Ford Ranger Lariat FX4. I didn't think higher octane would improve torque/horsepower.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +3

      Both engines. When Ford announced the horsepower for both the 2.3 and the 2.7 in the Broncos they upped it by about 15 hp later after they noted that if you ran a higher octane.
      The 2.7 in the bronco is 315 hp on 87 and 330 on 93

  • @idontknow2217
    @idontknow2217 Рік тому

    I like youre videos alot of information that interests me i was wondering if you know how compatible parts are between 2020 ford ranger 2.3 eco boost and 2020 ford explorer xlt 2.3 eco boost i been looking online for performance parts and only been finding them for the ranger

  • @86309
    @86309 2 роки тому

    I like it! Is this the same engine in the Ranger now -the 2.3, is there any significant difference? Is the Bronco rated at 270/310 same as the Ranger? Also does it have the top oil reservoir above the turbo bearing, like on the Raptor? Passive oiling post shutdown as it spools down?

  • @brianr1899
    @brianr1899 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the very knowledgeable videos.
    In your opinion, which engine 2.3 or 2.7, will be more reliable and require the least maintenance for long term ownership?
    Thanks for your time and effort.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +2

      I like them both. But between the two I will take the 2.7, with the dual injection helping to keep the intake valves cleaner, and more torque which equates to less strain on the engine and in my in my opinion better mpg then2.7’is my engine

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +3

      But to be clear, the 2.3 is a solid engine with more upgrade options available, the eco boost mustangs have created a huge after market supply of performance parts

  • @recognizelife8397
    @recognizelife8397 7 місяців тому

    So the 2.3 ecoboost in the bronco and ranger has a chain driven oil pump and the 2.7 liter ecoboost has a wet belt driven oil pump?

  • @rvHotRod
    @rvHotRod 2 роки тому +1

    Great video! I am seeing a lot of folks putting oil catch cans on the 2.3 and 2.7. Would you recommend this on the 2.3?

    • @MuhName
      @MuhName 2 роки тому

      Not if you are using quality oil and gas.....

  • @sealoftheliving4998
    @sealoftheliving4998 2 роки тому +1

    I have some question is this engine 2.3L ecoboost same as the Ford Explorer 2021 currently selling in the Philippines that is redesign to make to make to durable and reliable engine?

  • @laurahunt5146
    @laurahunt5146 5 місяців тому

    i went with a 2.0 block and 2.3 internals stronger block same power and torque no down side

  • @scout159
    @scout159 2 роки тому

    Exactly how does engine know the octane? I figure it advances until it knocks? 10-1 compression in 1975 was high compression ----Last --can I go to auto store and put octane booster in 87 octane to get a cheap way to extra HP? Or---put in ethanol blend--isnt ethanol about 125 octane?

  • @LinusScrubTips
    @LinusScrubTips 2 роки тому

    My main problem is the aluminum. People can say over and over it’s ok, but I don’t know. I’m a big LS guy, and the L33 V8s are not as reliable as the iron block counter parts like the LM7 V8s. There are plenty of LM7s with 400K-500k on them, while L33s struggle to make it to 200-300. I just can’t see a little aluminum 2.3 that’s constantly being pushed so hard on big huge ATs lasting 300K+ miles. Maybe others have a different opinion, but an engine is trash if it doesn’t last 300k-400k miles.

  • @xhdultrawalk
    @xhdultrawalk 2 роки тому +1

    Great vid, what are your thoughts on vent to atmosphere BOV vs the stock recirculating BOV on this 2.3 engine? I tried a turbosmart dual port 50% VTA 50% recirculating BOV and it felt sluggish so I removed it.

  • @LoveBandit1000
    @LoveBandit1000 Рік тому +2

    I was torn between the Ecoboost Mustang and the Hyundai Genesis Coupe (348hp). Amazing how different the engines are for the similar specs they share. The Ecoboost has loads of low end torque and almost feels like a V8 but sounds like crap (IMO). While the Hyundai Lambda motor makes good power to 6500 but it's torque peak is way up at 5200 RPM so it is a jewel of a motor but you gotta rev it up to get the goods! I ending up choosing the Hyundai Genesis coupe with a 6 speed manual but I liked both cars...

  • @georgestewart1042
    @georgestewart1042 3 роки тому +1

    Do you build engine's? Thanks for the info! I almost changed our order for a 2.3 because of constraints, but before I could I got a build date with the 2.7 and can't wait!

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +1

      I have many in the past, my son wants to put one together so it looks like I’m back in the game! Lol

  • @andylarson3547
    @andylarson3547 2 роки тому +1

    Wow, great video. Awesome technical information. Any issues with engine? Or mods you would do for regular use such as a catch can?

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      no large-scale issues, both the 2.3 and 2.7 are really good engines. I don't have an issue with adding a catch can, however, you should ask your dealer if you add one, will it void the warranty. I will be adding one in the future to ours. As far as mods for the engine, I will be leaving everything else factory.

  • @bradroecker6541
    @bradroecker6541 3 роки тому +6

    Thanks for the great video. I'm considering getting the 2.3 for better MPG's but my only concern is no fuel injectors in the intake manifold to help reduce carbon buildup. In your opinion, is this anything to worry about, and is there much difference in fuel economy between the two engines. I'm getting a four door non-sas. Thank you!

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +6

      Watch for my oil change video, you can now buy oil that is made for GDI engines and especially the ecoboost engines

    • @RandomlnternetGuy
      @RandomlnternetGuy 3 роки тому +5

      OIL CATCH CAN (Air/Oil seperator). It does NOT void the warranty and it reduces intake carbon build up a surprising bit!

    • @Paper.Power.Politics
      @Paper.Power.Politics 3 роки тому +8

      That’s why I bought a upr dual valve oil catch can! Problem solved no carbon build up! Lots of people don’t know this is the solution to that.

    • @jacobstrutner8232
      @jacobstrutner8232 2 роки тому +3

      There's never been a single verified Ecoboost heads coated in oil to date shown on the internet. It's all just scarry nonsense. The ones out there are jaguars or other brands

    • @Paper.Power.Politics
      @Paper.Power.Politics 2 роки тому

      @@jacobstrutner8232 your right!! I’m getting a ecoboost built and I’m using a built 4 port head that does come off the Jaguar/Range Rover evoque

  • @jimsiegrist2620
    @jimsiegrist2620 2 роки тому +1

    I am thinking about changing my 21/22 order from 2.7 to 2.3 because of the latest reports of dozens of 2.7 engine failures. I would pick the 2.3 and stick shift. But Im not sure yet. Your thoughts?

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому

      I have 0 concerns about the 2.7, if you read up on a 2.3 they had a short run of head gasket issues early on which they since resolved.
      The report that a lot of people are referring to on the drive is technically old news, if you look at the millions of 2.7 eco-boost engines on the road it is a very small percentage. They both are very good engines, I picked 2.7 for more torque and ultimately fuel efficiency.
      But you definitely have to pick what you’re more comfortable with

  • @kashg.5973
    @kashg.5973 2 роки тому +1

    Great details. What's your honest take on the reliability of the 2.3? I'm coming from two Toyotas including one with the 22RE - dang slow, but dang bulletproof.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  2 роки тому +6

      The 2.3 is a solid engine, even the ones that are run hard. There’s a lot of parts from in the aftermarket world but I think if you buy one and drive it with a little respect it’ll last a long time and hold up very well. The only thing I would say is like any other boosted Direct injection engine I would just keep an eye on carbon buildup and do proper maintenance

  • @CarStory
    @CarStory 3 роки тому +1

    I read about someone with Bronco and 2.7L motor dying after only 1000 miles. Metal shavings found in oil pan and in turbos. Very upsetting to hear since I ordered my Bronco with it.

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +4

      It happens. There are millions of ecoboost in use, I’m not worried yet 😎

    • @Bacnow
      @Bacnow 3 роки тому

      You worry too much! That’s a one in a million occurrence!

    • @fernarias
      @fernarias 3 роки тому +2

      But you have to ask, how did they drive it? Did they break in the engine in the first 500 miles? I purchased a sport motorcycle when they were all the rage. I kept hearing of people buying them and burning out their engines. I followed the factory break in and mine lasted 20 years and did 150k miles (sold it because I moved with no place to park).

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  3 роки тому +3

      @@fernarias agreed. Some think that break-in periods are no longer needed. I disagree, every engine I have built or owned from new has been run easy until 1500 to 2k miles.

    • @frandanco6289
      @frandanco6289 2 роки тому

      @@DrivenWildOutdoors BMW has you bring in your M car and they dump ALL the fluids at 1,200 miles, to keep your Warranty going..
      You have to do this, and I believe it makes great sense...
      A Long time ago, they did this 1200 mile process on ALL their Bimmers, and of course, that number got so high, they had to say stop... :)
      But for sure the M cars they want to be brought in..

  • @thinkingape7655
    @thinkingape7655 7 місяців тому +1

    Excellent video thank you!

  • @keithfitterer6899
    @keithfitterer6899 Рік тому +1

    How often should you change the oil in a 2.3l engine?

    • @DrivenWildOutdoors
      @DrivenWildOutdoors  Рік тому

      I change my 2.7 every 4 to 5k, the owner's manual says up to 10k, however, I will never let any engine of mine go that far.

  • @Passion4Stuff
    @Passion4Stuff Рік тому

    i'M PICKING UP A NEW BADLANDS SASQUATCH 2.3. I live in a seasonal location...tough winters, warm summers. Should I swap out to a full synthetic 0W? Also, why hybrid synthetic vs. full synthetic?