NASA APOLLO LUNAR SPACE SUIT DEVELOPMENT & FUNCTIONAL TESTS 1960s FILM XD10014z

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
  • Want to support this channel and help us preserve old films? Visit / periscopefilm
    Visit our website www.PeriscopeFilm.com
    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration presents this film from the late 1960s and the administration’s logo is the image that is shown in the opening sequence at 0:20. The U.S. Government and NASA present information about the lunar space suits and how they protect each astronaut, specifically using "Astronaut Andy" as an example at 1:14. The film uses cartoon depictions to portray an astronaut in a lunar space suit to illustrate what happens in space and how the suits perform to keep flight crew safe from hazardous conditions (1:15-4:04). Actual astronauts or stand-ins are shown wearing the real suits while the narrator describes safety and functional features from the first to the last layers of the materials (4:05-7:25). Components including a constant wear garment, a liquid-cool undergarment, a pressure garment assembly (including a helmet and gloves), a portable back pack life-support system, and a thermo micrometeriod garment are worn by a model astronaut throughout the film (4:18-4:39). Apollo flight crews will wear these suits and the film describes all the instruments as well as the process of each layer. A functional test is described for purposes of evaluation of temperature controls (6:00-6:20). The film provides a great deal of information and details about the lunar space suits for potential flight crew training purposes. At 8:00, a schematic shows the suit capabilities in simple format to illustrate its mechanisms for usage in missions. Backup safety features are also described for the potential wearer of this garment set, inlcuding a secondary emergency oxygen supply system (9:30). Multiple tests are performed, detailed, and an analysis of the results and any design changes are described (12:50-14:00). The Manned Spacecraft Center of NASA constructed portions of the suits. This educational video for astronauts and other NASA affiliates provides an in-depth analysis and review of the lunar space suits.
    We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
    This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFi...
    We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
    This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFi...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 320

  • @cblizz730
    @cblizz730 Рік тому +4

    66 years prior to this documentary there wasn't even indoor plumbing or electricity. Crazy how fast we innovated in such a short time.

  • @MrGrace
    @MrGrace 2 роки тому +8

    RIP Andy Astronaut 🙏🏿

  • @mpersad
    @mpersad 2 роки тому +16

    Another wonderful archive film. Thank you for all the work you do to bring these historic and important documentaries to a wider public via UA-cam.

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 2 роки тому +1

      NASA are bunch of deceivers watch David Weiss interviews his channel is DITRH

    • @the18thdoctor3
      @the18thdoctor3 2 роки тому +1

      @@flat-earther
      Incorrect. Stop shilling for conspiracy conmen.

  • @nursesteve2004
    @nursesteve2004 2 роки тому +18

    back in the early '60's when NASA had a bottomless budget and we had a clear goal of a man on the moon by 1969, NASA was hiring engineers of all varieties right out of college. A group of them were called together and told they would be manning the new Space Suit Division, and tasked with designing the space suits the astronauts would ned to work in space and on the moon. They told the NASA Exec "But we don't know anything about space suits!" The exec told them "Guess what? Nobody else in the world does either, so you guys will be the first."

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому +2

      NASA shills love posting corny evidence-free anecdotes like this. Pure cringe 😂

    • @84homey
      @84homey 11 місяців тому

      Interestingly NASA did NOT design the Apollo missions space suit. Instead they hired those well known space engineers and cutting edge astro physicists Playtex (you know.. the bra manufacturer). We are told by NASA that weight reduction for the mission was so important that every thread on the suit was counted. However, this did not stop them providing a sunglasses pocket - presumably for those "right in your eyes and in no atmosphere too" moments. Of course we wouldn't recommend taking off your helmet to put them on, but at least you knew you had them with you. Seriously, you couldn't make this stuff up!

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@84homey There's a video of them supposedly on the way to the moon where they're not even wearing spacesuits, they just disappeared 😂

    • @kamakaziozzie3038
      @kamakaziozzie3038 3 місяці тому

      @@papalegba6796you are correct Sir.

  • @zaphodb9213
    @zaphodb9213 2 роки тому +5

    Awesome. Simply awesome.

  • @Reverenz88-14
    @Reverenz88-14 Рік тому +1

    He'll be trading in his astronaut wings for a more PERMANENT variety - good Lord, that was a terrifying statement, good thing Andy's immortal

  • @3xfaster
    @3xfaster 2 роки тому +7

    Andy is like 60% head and part cherub 👼
    Awesome piece, probably for an audience of junior high or middle school students.
    Yeah that helmet port was definitely dropped, possible point of failure.

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 4 місяці тому

    Amazing piece of engineering 👍🚀

  • @mikem5043
    @mikem5043 2 роки тому +7

    I'd like to know more about how those cables and pulleys worked in the shoulder region

    • @heintmeyer2296
      @heintmeyer2296 2 роки тому +3

      ask and you shall receive: ua-cam.com/video/Eq--Mfit0LY/v-deo.html

    • @mikem5043
      @mikem5043 2 роки тому

      @@heintmeyer2296 Thank you for that link! Enjoyed it very much

  • @archenema6792
    @archenema6792 2 роки тому +9

    Thanks!
    I can't get enough of these NASA animated public releases!

    • @flat-earther
      @flat-earther 2 роки тому +5

      NASA is only here to deceive watch David Weiss interviews his channel is DITRH

    • @cybercat1531
      @cybercat1531 2 роки тому +3

      @@flat-earther OF COURSE.
      Unlike you rando who is a totally trustworthy source.
      Get lost LMAO

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 2 роки тому +4

      @@flat-earther Be gone, flerf! The adults are watching history here.

    • @slowjoy9
      @slowjoy9 7 місяців тому

      ​@@jacksons1010cartoons 👍

  • @rosepitts3274
    @rosepitts3274 Рік тому +1

    I wonder if there is any clothing sold that use that cooling tech? It would be so handy in AZ summers

  • @spaxspore
    @spaxspore 2 роки тому +15

    Lets see how it does in a vacum

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 роки тому +6

      First tested in March 1969 on Apollo 9.

    • @ericephemetherson3964
      @ericephemetherson3964 2 роки тому

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver This film about the space suit is another big lie which is a part of The Biggest Lie pulled on mankind. The space suit here depicted has the heat exchange unit and the narrator talks about the astronaut being in direct sunlight. So, what happens when an astronaut suddenly finds himself in the shade where the temperature drops 300 F instantaneously? Where is the heating unit? The PLSS suit shown here did not have one. Even if the PLSS suit had both cooling and heating units, how would they switch their operation upon sudden temperature change? Another bull shit is pressure inside the suit. Did you notice the man inside of that suit and his posture after blowing that suit up with oxygen or mixture of oxygen and nitrogen? He looked like a bubble with limited movements of his extremities. Look at the glove fingers. They are stiff as a hard rubber pipe because the inside presssure inhibits the thumb touching the index finger. Radiation easily penetrates the lining of the kind shown here. Cosmic rays are so potent that only a layer of our atmosphere can stop most of it even though some do reach the surface of the Earth but not as harmful as in pure space. This suit absolutely does not protect human living cells against powerful cosmic radiation. And why was the suit put under the test in a chamber with a mannequin and not a real human in it? Where are the suit tests with men in it? How can one believe that on the alleged Moon Armstrong put on the space suit for the first time in his life after it was tested in the chamber without anybody in it? A MANNEQUIN will not feel any damn thing. The damn doll will not tell if it's comfortable or if anything is leaking or not working properly. Was the temperature switched from blasting heat to instant cold within 2-5 seconds in that chamber? And back, too? Were people scared to wear that suit and step into the chamber? This test of suit alone does not prove that the suit was good. And all films with people on fake Moon look in those suits like in swimming suits that don't hinder one of their movements. They hold screws and bolts just as if they were on Earth (they are on Earth in a studio). The pick up very small parts with their gloves. They operate the camera shutter with ease. They use tools and other contraptions requiring fine tunning with fingers. None of the suits look puffed up. The wrist and elbow areas look like the suit is simply worn loosely on body. They have no difficulties bending, getting up when they fall or kneeling. Landing on the Moon is pure crap. Compare this film with alleged films from the Moon of alleged people on the alleged Moon. There is such an enormous difference in technological portrayals. I cannot believe that people are so gullible and believe that man was on the Moon. There was absolutely no ONE on the Moon. The suit and other things in Apollo program were faked on unbelievable scale.

    • @EdwinDekker71
      @EdwinDekker71 2 роки тому

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver research DITRH, you're being lied to

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 роки тому +3

      @@EdwinDekker71 No, explain it.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 2 роки тому +1

      They did well as you know

  • @Chris_at_Home
    @Chris_at_Home 2 роки тому +8

    A friend that lived near me in the early 60s Dad was an engineer on the backpack environmental system. My Dad worked on the RL 10 rocket engine for a year in West Palm Beach and then the Apollo fuel cell in Connecticut.

    • @christopherhughes2211
      @christopherhughes2211 2 роки тому

      Did he pass on anything interesting , or worth sharing?
      At this point the guys working on the early space programs have moved on to a better place.
      We’ll never have another generation like these guys. Some of that is because of the absolutely criminal defunding of our public schools and making college outside of lower and middle class families financial capabilities. It is utterly contemptible how far we have fallen in compared to every Western European countries standard of education, health care, and standards of living. It is criminal how far we have fallen from our former place of imminence the video shows. Shame! Shame on all of these self centered and corrupt politicians from both parties. To hell with BOTH parties!

    • @timmoles9259
      @timmoles9259 2 роки тому

      No way can we make a 50lb backpack that can handle -330 F to 256 F and provide the power not only to run the heat exchangers but provide atmospheric life support systems to include all the power for the recirculation pumps. Former US Navy deep-sea fleet diver. We ran recompression chambers and compressor systems and I can tell you it is impossible.

    • @the18thdoctor3
      @the18thdoctor3 2 роки тому

      @@timmoles9259 84 pounds, actually, plus the 41 pound backup system. Do some research.

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@the18thdoctor3 this video says 50 pounds. NASA are such liars 😂

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@timmoles9259 I like how in this video they didn't show the actual interior workings of their miracle back pack, just a crude drawing 😂

  • @longboardfella5306
    @longboardfella5306 2 роки тому +6

    Fantastic! Learned some new things like hire they knew the astronauts could get up again if they fell down. And we actually saw them do it during Apollo. Wasn't easy but imagine that first design being used.

    • @Jimmyzb36
      @Jimmyzb36 2 роки тому

      I may or have not viewed this many moons ago. Thanks for sharing!!!!

  • @nitsudocsicnarf347
    @nitsudocsicnarf347 Рік тому +1

    No man has left the magnetosphere. All have been unmanned machines only.

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому +1

      Are you living under a rock? Never heard about the Apollo missions?

    • @slowjoy9
      @slowjoy9 7 місяців тому

      ​@@julesdomes6064 there is a vast group of people that question those missions, for good reasons.

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 7 місяців тому

      @@slowjoy9 Conspiracy theorists "question" everything:
      - Jet contrails are mind control poisons
      - Nuclear weapons are fake
      - The late Queen of England was a shape shifting reptilian
      - Michelle Obama is a man
      - Earth is flat
      - Etc etc..
      But they can never present a single piece of evidence for their claims

  • @josephstevens9888
    @josephstevens9888 2 роки тому +8

    NASA designed a lunar EVA suit in the 1960's; why are they having so much trouble designing a lunar EVA suit for the Artemis Program?

    • @nursesteve2004
      @nursesteve2004 2 роки тому +10

      because the new space suits have to be able to deal with lunar regolith, the lunar dust. Studies made on the spacesuits worn by Gene Cernan and Jack Schmitt, who both spent more time on the lunar surface than any pervious missions, showed that the lunar dust was so deeply embedded in the suits that they were dangerously close to failing, because the regolith's microscopically sharp edges were beginning to wear down the outer layers and compromise the seal. Clearly a new suit designed to be worn outside on the surface for days at a time is needed.

    • @MrEh5
      @MrEh5 2 роки тому +5

      @@nursesteve2004 plus they want the suits to be more flexible.

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@nursesteve2004 The outer suit isn't sealed tho 😂

  • @mebels4529
    @mebels4529 Рік тому +3

    It’s amazing people bought this 😅

    • @ericephemetherson3964
      @ericephemetherson3964 Рік тому +1

      People did. But some did not:
      ua-cam.com/video/sDggkBUSZl8/v-deo.html

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому +1

      Sane people believe in reality.
      Paranoid conspiracy theorists do not.

  • @mthury4532
    @mthury4532 2 роки тому +3

    At 13:10 early LM mock-up. It had the round entry hatch. Presently in a museum on Long Island.

  • @jonathanzivan1885
    @jonathanzivan1885 2 роки тому +4

    Very timely given today’s SpaceX announcement. Adds lots of background understanding of exactly what the challenges are. So amazing what they accomplished with 1960’s tech. Those guys were amazing!

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 роки тому

      Is Elon going again to the Moon by the end of the year?

    • @jonathanzivan1885
      @jonathanzivan1885 2 роки тому

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver baby steps! Going to high orbit with an EVA outfit!

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 роки тому +1

      @@jonathanzivan1885 Elon said in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 that he'd be to the Moon by year's end. I note he toned it down a lot once he got that fat USA contract.

    • @jonathanzivan1885
      @jonathanzivan1885 2 роки тому

      @@RideAcrossTheRiver
      SpaceX is a whole lot closer to going to the moon than anyone else! So exciting to see progress!

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 роки тому +2

      ​@@jonathanzivan1885 Closer? Half-a-dozen nations have working probes at the Moon and the USA sent nine manned missions there. Musk's 'plan' has been all along to sell to the USA gear he had manufactured by investor money. There's no profit in 'going to the Moon' and Elon is a profiteer.

  • @stekra3159
    @stekra3159 2 роки тому +1

    Yes astronauts are lquid coolded

  • @indigohammer5732
    @indigohammer5732 2 роки тому +2

    Nice one! Thanks.

  • @kamakaziozzie3038
    @kamakaziozzie3038 3 місяці тому

    If gravity is real, why can it only be observed and predicted…but not directly measured?

  • @pgakagi
    @pgakagi 2 роки тому +5

    Is it a Neil Armstrong on 0:36 mark?

    • @deanhirasawa1414
      @deanhirasawa1414 2 роки тому

      I noticed the same thing. It sure looks like him! How ironic and appropriate!

  • @blakedblake6143
    @blakedblake6143 2 роки тому +3

    Great find. I can't get enough of this stuff. Such a nerd.
    Late 60's!? This feels, "prototype/proof of concept taken to the first trials," in its timeline. They must have made huge strides in those last couple/few years before final design that we all know and love. Never did get the mobility issues ironed out though. Causes me to wonder how much improvement they have made for the new ones. Its a real concern. These folks need really good mobility so they don't fatigue too quickly. I would imagine moonwalking is a lot different then your standard spacewalk.

  • @tomstamford6837
    @tomstamford6837 2 роки тому +9

    You watch this and marvel at how much science, thought and design has gone into just this one part of space exploration and then some jackaloon, wiping the drool off their chin as they pull their snout out of a bag of cheetos, comes up with... that's all BS, never happened, can't be done.

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +7

      @Occult Ocelot based on your profile I'd say you are a conspiracy enthusiast. So your opinions are most likely invalid due to insanity.

    • @tomstamford6837
      @tomstamford6837 2 роки тому +3

      @Occult Ocelot Nah... I'm obviously fake. I don't really exist, like the voices in your head feeding you conspiracies.
      Oh damn, I wasn't supposed to admit that!

    • @parttime9070
      @parttime9070 2 роки тому +2

      @Occult Ocelot Jones fluffer logic..

    • @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245
      @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 2 роки тому +3

      @Occult Ocelot which of the thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the data and samples from the Apollo missions have you proven fake?

    • @andrewfarrow4699
      @andrewfarrow4699 2 роки тому +1

      Jackaloon. I like that word. ,,🙂

  • @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow
    @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow Рік тому +2

    Oh the space suits that do up with zippers..... How did they test that in the Tor Level of the Moons vaccum?

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому +2

      Vacuum chambers. It isn't magic, just engineering.

    • @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow
      @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow Рік тому

      @@kitcanyon658 not the Tor level of the moon however.

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому +3

      @@NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow : Vacuum chambers easily replicate extremely low pressure levels 24/7 on planet earth.
      As an engineer, you'd understand that a suit is about the forces involved. Pressure inside the suit at less than 4psi and the difference in pressure outside the suit, essentially 0psi.
      The force on zippers, material, or stitching is no different if the outside test pressure is 1 Torr or 1x10-7 Torr.
      Do the calculations yourself. Unless you have zero knowledge of engineering and in that case, go ask a real engineer.

    • @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow
      @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow Рік тому

      @@kitcanyon658 NASA built a vaccum chamber for high Tor values but only after the moon missions.

    • @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow
      @NeilPeelParanormalPeepShow Рік тому

      @@kitcanyon658 oh there is this University engineer guy that uses Vaccum chambers but he says the suits are pure fantasy.

  • @coonhoundqueen9216
    @coonhoundqueen9216 2 роки тому +4

    That was a really neat one...how is it even as adults we seem to retain more information from a cartoon lol ?

    • @robertusa1234
      @robertusa1234 2 роки тому +1

      Most of the films where sent to school.

    • @coonhoundqueen9216
      @coonhoundqueen9216 2 роки тому

      @@robertusa1234 ..didn't think of that but makes sense thanks for the comment

  • @sprtplt
    @sprtplt 2 роки тому +9

    Clearly, in light of today's understanding of physics and technology, the purported tech used to land and stay (days in later landings) could not possibly have happened. Many of the obstacles have not been solved to this day.

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому +3

      You are wrong. Don't believe stupidity based conspiracy theories.

    • @dalek14mc
      @dalek14mc 9 місяців тому +2

      Then why don’t modern physicists deny the moon landings?

    • @slowjoy9
      @slowjoy9 7 місяців тому

      ​@@dalek14mcwhy didn't they warn you about experimental mandates? NDA

    • @dalek14mc
      @dalek14mc 7 місяців тому

      @@slowjoy9 And, of courses, the denialist has to change the topic to vaccines. What does that have to do with physicists, you numpty?

    • @oceanic8424
      @oceanic8424 7 місяців тому

      And you’re also assuming that the Soviets were willing participants in this so-called monumental hoax. That in of itself is extremely unlikely bc the US embarrassed and humiliated the USSR by being the first to land humans on the moon. 1960’s space exploration technology was the absolute summit of the tech of its era. Too many ppl are still falling for the fake moon landings conspiracy theories.

  • @lordjim6323
    @lordjim6323 2 роки тому +15

    Mahahaha... What a joke😂😂😂

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 2 роки тому +4

      Translation: you don’t understand any of this, and assuming yourself to be intelligent you conclude it must be nonsense. 🙄

    • @mattdavis4701
      @mattdavis4701 2 роки тому +6

      @@jacksons1010 wake up.

    • @lordjim6323
      @lordjim6323 2 роки тому +1

      @@jacksons1010 Yes, I guess it must be my Donner - Kruger syndrome....

    • @ericephemetherson3964
      @ericephemetherson3964 2 роки тому +2

      This film about the space suit is another big lie which is a part of The Biggest Lie pulled on mankind. The space suit here depicted has the heat exchange unit and the narrator talks about the astronaut being in direct sunlight. So, what happens when an astronaut suddenly finds himself in the shade where the temperature drops 300 F instantaneously? Where is the heating unit? The PLSS suit shown here did not have one. Even if the PLSS suit had both cooling and heating units, how would they switch their operation upon sudden temperature change? Another bull shit is pressure inside the suit. Did you notice the man inside of that suit and his posture after blowing that suit up with oxygen or mixture of oxygen and nitrogen? He looked like a bubble with limited movements of his extremities. Look at the glove fingers. They are stiff as a hard rubber pipe because the inside presssure inhibits the thumb touching the index finger. Radiation easily penetrates the lining of the kind shown here. Cosmic rays are so potent that only a layer of our atmosphere can stop most of it even though some do reach the surface of the Earth but not as harmful as in pure space. This suit absolutely does not protect human living cells against powerful cosmic radiation. And why was the suit put under the test in a chamber with a mannequin and not a real human in it? Where are the suit tests with men in it? How can one believe that on the alleged Moon Armstrong put on the space suit for the first time in his life after it was tested in the chamber without anybody in it? A MANNEQUIN will not feel any damn thing. The damn doll will not tell if it's comfortable or if anything is leaking or not working properly. Was the temperature switched from blasting heat to instant cold within 2-5 seconds in that chamber? And back, too? Were people scared to wear that suit and step into the chamber? This test of suit alone does not prove that the suit was good. And all films with people on fake Moon look in those suits like in swimming suits that don't hinder one of their movements. They hold screws and bolts just as if they were on Earth (they are on Earth in a studio). The pick up very small parts with their gloves. They operate the camera shutter with ease. They use tools and other contraptions requiring fine tunning with fingers. None of the suits look puffed up. The wrist and elbow areas look like the suit is simply worn loosely on body. They have no difficulties bending, getting up when they fall or kneeling. Landing on the Moon is pure crap. Compare this film with alleged films from the Moon of alleged people on the alleged Moon. There is such an enormous difference in technological portrayals. I cannot believe that people are so gullible and believe that man was on the Moon. There was absolutely no ONE on the Moon. The suit and other things in Apollo program were faked on unbelievable scale.

    • @EdwinDekker71
      @EdwinDekker71 2 роки тому

      @@jacksons1010 visit DITRH and do the research....it's fake

  • @Speedracer415
    @Speedracer415 Рік тому +2

    Power supply for the suit is where. LoL. What size of battery. In there

    • @zounds010
      @zounds010 Рік тому +2

      The battery was a 279 (later 380) Wh zilver-zinc battery that was swapped after every EVA.

    • @Speedracer415
      @Speedracer415 Рік тому

      @@zounds010 the silver -zinc battery never went to space. Such use in space was thanks to nickel-candium batteries only. Silver never went to space. So who is lying here.

    • @zounds010
      @zounds010 Рік тому +4

      @@Speedracer415 That is incorrect. I have NASA documents that indicate both the LM and the PLSS were powered by silver-zinc batteries.

  • @Mrmusha53
    @Mrmusha53 2 роки тому +16

    Never went to the moon

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 2 роки тому +1

      Of course you didn't. That required an education past elementary school, bro.

    • @parttime9070
      @parttime9070 2 роки тому

      The moon is flat.!

    • @rastersoft
      @rastersoft 2 роки тому

      @@parttime9070 And made of cheese!

    • @tjlovesrachel
      @tjlovesrachel 2 роки тому +1

      I went to your sisters house tho

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 2 роки тому +2

      Never learned critical thinking?

  • @Bradonomous
    @Bradonomous 2 роки тому

    A L W A Y S H A S B E E N

  • @papalegba6796
    @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

    The helmet has a hole in it 😂

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому +1

      And...? You think there would be a hole when it is used in space?

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@julesdomes6064 It definitely has a hole in it, blind chatbot bro 😂

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому

      @@papalegba6796 And you are the only one who has discovered it.
      You must be super smart and special. The rest of the world must be super dumb.

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@julesdomes6064 it's literally in the video, blind chatbot 😂

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому

      @@papalegba6796 Yes, there is a port that can be opened.
      What is your point?
      No, it is of course not opened in the vacuum of space.

  • @JamesHawkeYouTube
    @JamesHawkeYouTube 2 роки тому +5

    Heat exchangers don't work in a vacuum.

    • @ericephemetherson3964
      @ericephemetherson3964 2 роки тому +1

      Sir ! There was no man on the Moon. This siut is crap. I'll write in the public place about it.

    • @ericephemetherson3964
      @ericephemetherson3964 2 роки тому +1

      This film about the space suit is another big lie which is a part of The Biggest Lie pulled on mankind. The space suit here depicted has the heat exchange unit and the narrator talks about the astronaut being in direct sunlight. So, what happens when an astronaut suddenly finds himself in the shade where the temperature drops 300 F instantaneously? Where is the heating unit? The PLSS suit shown here did not have one. Even if the PLSS suit had both cooling and heating units, how would they switch their operation upon sudden temperature change? Another bull shit is pressure inside the suit. Did you notice the man inside of that suit and his posture after blowing that suit up with oxygen or mixture of oxygen and nitrogen? He looked like a bubble with limited movements of his extremities. Look at the glove fingers. They are stiff as a hard rubber pipe because the inside presssure inhibits the thumb touching the index finger. Radiation easily penetrates the lining of the kind shown here. Cosmic rays are so potent that only a layer of our atmosphere can stop most of it even though some do reach the surface of the Earth but not as harmful as in pure space. This suit absolutely does not protect human living cells against powerful cosmic radiation. And why was the suit put under the test in a chamber with a mannequin and not a real human in it? Where are the suit tests with men in it? How can one believe that on the alleged Moon Armstrong put on the space suit for the first time in his life after it was tested in the chamber without anybody in it? A MANNEQUIN will not feel any damn thing. The damn doll will not tell if it's comfortable or if anything is leaking or not working properly. Was the temperature switched from blasting heat to instant cold within 2-5 seconds in that chamber? And back, too? Were people scared to wear that suit and step into the chamber? This test of suit alone does not prove that the suit was good. And all films with people on fake Moon look in those suits like in swimming suits that don't hinder one of their movements. They hold screws and bolts just as if they were on Earth (they are on Earth in a studio). The pick up very small parts with their gloves. They operate the camera shutter with ease. They use tools and other contraptions requiring fine tunning with fingers. None of the suits look puffed up. The wrist and elbow areas look like the suit is simply worn loosely on body. They have no difficulties bending, getting up when they fall or kneeling. Landing on the Moon is pure crap. Compare this film with alleged films from the Moon of alleged people on the alleged Moon. There is such an enormous difference in technological portrayals. I cannot believe that people are so gullible and believe that man was on the Moon. There was absolutely no ONE on the Moon. The suit and other things in Apollo program were faked on unbelievable scale.

    • @ericephemetherson3964
      @ericephemetherson3964 2 роки тому

      This film about the space suit is another big lie which is a part of The Biggest Lie pulled on mankind. The space suit here depicted has the heat exchange unit and the narrator talks about the astronaut being in direct sunlight. So, what happens when an astronaut suddenly finds himself in the shade where the temperature drops 300 F instantaneously? Where is the heating unit? The PLSS suit shown here did not have one. Even if the PLSS suit had both cooling and heating units, how would they switch their operation upon sudden temperature change? Another bull shit is pressure inside the suit. Did you notice the man inside of that suit and his posture after blowing that suit up with oxygen or mixture of oxygen and nitrogen? He looked like a bubble with limited movements of his extremities. Look at the glove fingers. They are stiff as a hard rubber pipe because the inside presssure inhibits the thumb touching the index finger. Radiation easily penetrates the lining of the kind shown here. Cosmic rays are so potent that only a layer of our atmosphere can stop most of it even though some do reach the surface of the Earth but not as harmful as in pure space. This suit absolutely does not protect human living cells against powerful cosmic radiation. And why was the suit put under the test in a chamber with a mannequin and not a real human in it? Where are the suit tests with men in it? How can one believe that on the alleged Moon Armstrong put on the space suit for the first time in his life after it was tested in the chamber without anybody in it? A MANNEQUIN will not feel any damn thing. The damn doll will not tell if it's comfortable or if anything is leaking or not working properly. Was the temperature switched from blasting heat to instant cold within 2-5 seconds in that chamber? And back, too? Were people scared to wear that suit and step into the chamber? This test of suit alone does not prove that the suit was good. And all films with people on fake Moon look in those suits like in swimming suits that don't hinder one of their movements. They hold screws and bolts just as if they were on Earth (they are on Earth in a studio). The pick up very small parts with their gloves. They operate the camera shutter with ease. They use tools and other contraptions requiring fine tunning with fingers. None of the suits look puffed up. The wrist and elbow areas look like the suit is simply worn loosely on body. They have no difficulties bending, getting up when they fall or kneeling. Landing on the Moon is pure crap. Compare this film with alleged films from the Moon of alleged people on the alleged Moon. There is such an enormous difference in technological portrayals. I cannot believe that people are so gullible and believe that man was on the Moon. There was absolutely no ONE on the Moon. The suit and other things in Apollo program were faked on unbelievable scale.

    • @PDZ1122
      @PDZ1122 2 роки тому +5

      Wow! Did you think of writing to NASA to let them know? I'm sure they would appreciate a UA-cam physicist letting then know they don't know what they are doing. Thank dog for UA-cam!

    • @EdwinDekker71
      @EdwinDekker71 2 роки тому

      The 2nd law of thermodynamics is violated by "gas balls forming in space" (star formation) and the idea of having any kind of pressure system without containment. The globe is a lie. Research at DITRH

  • @fourtyfivefudd
    @fourtyfivefudd 2 роки тому

    Does anyone know why, if these suits smaller more flexible suits were already developed, then why did we use those massive bulky and clumsy white suits we still use today?

  • @bartgriffin5259
    @bartgriffin5259 2 роки тому +3

    Lmao.

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 2 роки тому +2

      Stupid people are easily amused. Laugh away, dummy. 🤡

  • @jeep250es5
    @jeep250es5 2 роки тому +5

    When can we stop pretending we went to the moon?

    • @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245
      @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 2 роки тому +3

      Which of the thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the data and samples from the Apollo missions have you proven fake?

    • @jeep250es5
      @jeep250es5 2 роки тому

      @@thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 I've been looking, I can't seem to find the telemetry data from from the Apollo missions.

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +5

      @@jeep250es5 you can't? It's on the Space Science Data Coordinated Archive. The relevant data is also available in each Apollo mission report. I'd eat my shoe if you even knew what telemetry data actually is.

    • @jeep250es5
      @jeep250es5 2 роки тому +3

      @Casanova Frankenstein Telemetry data mostly concerns aircraft/engine performance, gathered from an array of dozens of sensors. In an aircraft it consists of the data recorded by the flight data recorder or “black box”. It’s a stream of endless and boring numbers with things like data/time, altitude, attitude, airspeed, engine power, fuel levels, voltage levels, status of various control inputs, and dozens of other pieces of data. It’s useful only for analyzing a failure of the vehicle. What was the engine, fuel system, electrical system, doing right before the failure? What was the altitude, position, attitude, speed of the craft? What were the control inputs from the pilot
      I hope you enjoy the flavor of your cheap Wal mart shoes

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +1

      @@jeep250es5 nice copy and paste you elitist dum-dum.

  • @jaminova_1969
    @jaminova_1969 2 роки тому +2

    NASA not only wanted to get Astronauts to the Moon, they wanted to bring them home too!

  • @o3xygen610
    @o3xygen610 2 роки тому +1

    Certified amogus

  • @obaidashafai1797
    @obaidashafai1797 2 роки тому +6

    So you are telling me that the gasses inside the human body will expand in vacuum but the gasses and air trapped in the magic suit will not, according to your explanation he should look like a balloon, what a load of crap and lies

    • @bullshitlatinname1243
      @bullshitlatinname1243 2 роки тому +5

      the gasses in the suit do expand, and it is called "Ballooning". the reason why it doesn't pop is due to how the suit is built. lots of dens criss crossing fabric like layers of aluminum, Mylar, Dacron, nylon, and Teflon. all serving the purpose of protecting the astronauts from lunar dust, extreme temperature, the vacuum of space and allowing the suit to expand whilst still allowing the astronauts to move somewhat comfortably. think of it like a backwards deep dive suit.

    • @EdwinDekker71
      @EdwinDekker71 2 роки тому

      @@bullshitlatinname1243 the mind control is strong

    • @the18thdoctor3
      @the18thdoctor3 2 роки тому +2

      @@EdwinDekker71
      Why do you refuse to do any research at all?

  • @markhollander1201
    @markhollander1201 2 роки тому +3

    I don't believe in Santa Claus anymore then I believe in this Walt Disney production called NASA (National Academy of Space Actors).

    • @MrGrace
      @MrGrace 2 роки тому +4

      No one cares.

    • @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245
      @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 2 роки тому +6

      Which of the thousands of peer reviewed scientific papers on the data and samples from the Apollo missions have you proven fake?

    • @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245
      @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 2 роки тому +5

      @Occult Ocelot go to your nearest university library and read the January 30,1970 issue of Science and its 144 papers on the data and samples from Apollo 11, then get back to us.

    • @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245
      @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 2 роки тому +6

      @Occult Ocelot the continuing question, believe every relevant scientist on the globe or random ignoramus on the internet?

    • @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245
      @thegrumpyoldmechanic6245 2 роки тому +5

      @Occult Ocelot which of the many Nobel Prize winning physicists who have studied the Apollo samples and data have you proven fakes?

  • @richardbailey3343
    @richardbailey3343 Рік тому

    So how were scientist able to demonstrate their is no breathable air in space did they expose biological air breather s to that environment?.
    Regards

    • @kitcanyon658
      @kitcanyon658 Рік тому +1

      All they have to do is measure the pressure. No pressure, or extremely little amount of it, proves a human cannot breathe there. Also, they could take samples and figure out the make up of any atmosphere sample.

  • @peacefulinhabitant3033
    @peacefulinhabitant3033 2 роки тому +5

    NASA = never a straight answer

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +1

      Please give one example of this. Just one would be fine.

    • @peacefulinhabitant3033
      @peacefulinhabitant3033 2 роки тому

      @@casanovafrankenstein4193 ok you asked for it lol here is what some say take it for whatsoever entertains one i find it fascinating
      ua-cam.com/channels/qjHW3sIVWspvEw9yRW_Hcw.html
      and this as well
      ua-cam.com/users/ConspiracyMusicGuru
      enjoy another view point on where we live
      what ever ones does or dont do have fun peace

    • @EdwinDekker71
      @EdwinDekker71 2 роки тому

      Not A Space Agency

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 2 роки тому +1

      @@EdwinDekker71 Awww... ❤️ That's so super smart and special! 😀
      Must feel good to be the smartest guy on Earth.

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +1

      @@EdwinDekker71 we got another genius on our hands here. Watch out. Big brain Ed coming through!

  • @longbone6416
    @longbone6416 2 роки тому +7

    If you believe this..your no engineer

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 2 роки тому +3

      Wrong. I am an aerospace engineer, and I know it makes sense and is true.

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +2

      Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Thanks for the laugh. Oh man...

    • @longbone6416
      @longbone6416 2 роки тому +2

      @@julesdomes6064 sure you are

    • @longbone6416
      @longbone6416 2 роки тому +3

      @@julesdomes6064 did they test the suit in a vacuum chamber...just once for 15seconds before tester passed out..no more tests..but in workked perfect in space

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 2 роки тому +2

      @@longbone6416 Yes, I am an aerospace engineer. And I work in the satellite industry.
      What kind of engineer are you?

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas3477 7 місяців тому

    Here's a special something for people who think we didn't land on the moon. 💩

  • @hulahands7833
    @hulahands7833 Рік тому

    🤣🤣🤣

  • @robertusa1234
    @robertusa1234 2 роки тому +3

    Address every problem but the most obvious. Bathroom brake ishues

    • @richardhead8264
      @richardhead8264 2 роки тому

      _That's the main reason I would never be an astronaut._
      _Imagine filling your suit with diarrhea in zero gravity!_

    • @robertusa1234
      @robertusa1234 2 роки тому +2

      @@richardhead8264 they have s very old method to deal with it. A good old fashion diaper

    • @jacksons1010
      @jacksons1010 2 роки тому +2

      @@richardhead8264 They wear something akin to Depends undergarments for EVAs.

    • @tomstamford6837
      @tomstamford6837 2 роки тому

      @@jacksons1010 I love the name given to them, the Maximum Absorbency Garment

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      So they got diapers on & off under that tight fitting inner suit? Don't think so 😂

  • @peacefulinhabitant3033
    @peacefulinhabitant3033 2 роки тому

    how did they pop and pee?

    • @tomstamford6837
      @tomstamford6837 2 роки тому +2

      There's a more technical answer, but basically they had diapers on. The Maximum Absorbency Garment is part of the Fecal Containment System they had developed. So when they had to go... they went.
      On top of that, they had low residue diets that minimised the need to poop.

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      There's no diapers in this film tho. Could it be you just made that up?😂

  • @mattdavis4701
    @mattdavis4701 2 роки тому +1

    Too much truth in my comment. It got taken down and definitely followed community standards. All scientist agree when you censor the ones who don't.

    • @ThomasKundera
      @ThomasKundera 2 роки тому +3

      What was that supposed "truth" about?

    • @casanovafrankenstein4193
      @casanovafrankenstein4193 2 роки тому +5

      @@ThomasKundera I'm sure it was some stupid shit about people being sheeple, Freemasons, or something equally ridiculous.

  • @michaelclanton1152
    @michaelclanton1152 2 роки тому

    I would think that Kevlar is used in the suits of today for puncture protection.

  • @tadeumigoto8788
    @tadeumigoto8788 2 роки тому +1

    watching these old movies about man going to the moon, I'm even more convinced that they didn't go to the moon.

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 2 роки тому +9

      Sorry to hear you fell for stupidity based conspiracy theories.

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@julesdomes6064

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому

      @@papalegba6796 Actual engineer spending some time debunking nonsense on YT.

    • @papalegba6796
      @papalegba6796 11 місяців тому

      @@julesdomes6064 Sure 😂

    • @julesdomes6064
      @julesdomes6064 11 місяців тому

      @@papalegba6796 Exactly. And way more useful than being a willfully ignorant conspiracy theorists posting demented nonsense.

  • @Speedracer415
    @Speedracer415 Рік тому

    Funny how the hole the, he says unknown, unknown, unknown oh but we know the moon's gravity... LoL bs

    • @zounds010
      @zounds010 Рік тому +1

      Lunar gravity is easily predictable from Earth using its size and orbit.

    • @kamakaziozzie3038
      @kamakaziozzie3038 3 місяці тому

      Perhaps the dome that keeps air leaking out into space not only surrounds the firmament but the moon as well 😉