Christopher Darden Closing Argument - O.J. Simpson Murder Trial - Part 2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
  • Chris Dardens prosecution Closin argument at the O.J. Simpson Murder Case. Part 2

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @NaeM2024
    @NaeM2024 8 років тому +5

    It's October 25th, not October twenty five. It's defenDENT, not defenDANT...Chris is a horrid example of what not to be like when it comes to people trying to become an attorney.

  • @Rasslinwithracism
    @Rasslinwithracism 5 місяців тому

    Why would Nicole want a random stranger living with her children?

  • @Shellshock361
    @Shellshock361 3 роки тому

    The motive in this case is so clear cut. That even before the blood etc, people would've assumed he'd done it.

  • @sl33pyn4y3
    @sl33pyn4y3 3 роки тому +2

    It’s horrible that he got off but the LAPD are to blame you reap what you sew always! And that Mark Furhman wasn’t the only bad apple he talked of what him and his cop buddies did. There are so many blacks that can tell you horrible stories about the LAPD. They feel superior and blacks weren’t so they did what they wanted to do. Mark furhman said he pleads the 5th when asked if he ever planted evidence and forged things in this trial. If he didn’t he would have said NO. So blame the LAPS for this.

  • @Twp205
    @Twp205 5 років тому +2

    Chris Darden is so damn boring!! I'll bet the jury was over there asleep!😪😴

  • @johnbaker7048
    @johnbaker7048 7 років тому +6

    Any American citizen willing to convict this man on faulty and quite frankly contaminated evidence is not a true American.
    If you are American you would KNOW that this kind of belief went against OJ's constitutional rights and had he been found guilty he would have appealed and the appellate court would have reversed the trial court's decision.
    The appellate court would have either did one of two things, Free him or grant him a new trial. Either way, those who believe OJ to be guilty would have still lost either way so thank God the jury used common sense and recognized the facts of the evidence created reasonable doubt in this case.
    Aside from all that, let's look at the evidence. Many of those who believe OJ is guilty swear they're scholars because they claim to have watched the whole trial from beginning to end.
    Many of these people continuously stipulate that Mr. Simpson is guilty on the premise of his blood being remotely found at the crime scene on Bundy to say HE'S GUILTY without taking into account that first and foremost you had a racist cop on the force name Mark Furhman who admitted on tape to "planting" evidence on people of color who he hates as well as his EVIL twin brother of "deception" Philip Vannatter a veteran detective who decided it was a good idea to have both the victims blood and the accused blood vials in his possession while seen on camera walking around Mr. Simpson property the day after these brutal murders.
    Mr. Simpson is INNOCENT and was "clearly" FRAMED for these brutal murders and that's why the Jury "rightfully" ACQUITTED him of double murder over 20 years ago.
    CASE CLOSED!!!
    WELCOME HOME JUICE... 😃👍

    • @oliviachacon6000
      @oliviachacon6000 6 років тому +2

      John Baker
      Hes guilty as fuck. He then commits a federal offense of assault & robbery claiming those were his things. He lost them to the Goldmans in the civil trial. Which they never received. So you still think this bitch was innocent?

    • @Twp205
      @Twp205 5 років тому +1

      @John Baker...... Well said!!!

    • @Factsworld_001
      @Factsworld_001 3 роки тому +1

      @@oliviachacon6000 I don't think he was innocent but The percecution could not prove it beyond Reasonable Doubt.

    • @7thswordsmenofthemist
      @7thswordsmenofthemist Рік тому

      So who committed the murder then? There were no other suspects🤷‍♂️