KURT RUSSELL Pro or Against Gay Marriage?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 80

  • @josefmassey3389
    @josefmassey3389 7 років тому +28

    take the word, "marriage" from marriage equality, and you have everything kurt russel represents.

  • @kameron454ci
    @kameron454ci 10 років тому +64

    why would you ask someone who has been with the same person over 30 years now and never been married a question about marriage?

    • @requiemforamerica8432
      @requiemforamerica8432 9 років тому +19

      +kameron454ci bc most socalled journalists are just looking for political correctness and trying to catch anybody being politically incorrect so they can write up about it and make their libtard mainstream career

    • @Salakert
      @Salakert 6 років тому +6

      I had not idea they were not married...clearly proves (with 50% of divorces) marriage is NOT a guarantor of fidelity!

    • @kimmyhawk5530
      @kimmyhawk5530 3 роки тому +2

      I think he was married at one point. To his oldest son's Mother..

    • @wingitprod
      @wingitprod 3 роки тому +1

      @@requiemforamerica8432 that sums it up.

    • @Barnaclebeard
      @Barnaclebeard 2 роки тому +2

      To generate this clickbait title.

  • @tex757
    @tex757 9 років тому +37

    He articulates his point perfectly.

  • @xanderathome
    @xanderathome Рік тому +9

    He is an actor not a politician so why is shecasking this ?
    But that said he gave a great answer.

  • @davsny5
    @davsny5 2 роки тому +20

    Considering he has been with Goldie Hawn forever and has not gotten married, what was the point of the question?

  • @dmacrasur3183
    @dmacrasur3183 3 роки тому +19

    Kurt is a principled and smart dude. Speaks his mind without be offensive. ..except to snowflakes..they're offended by everything.

  • @ermertieplug
    @ermertieplug Рік тому +5

    Basically, he doesn't want to talk about it

  • @Blueridge1
    @Blueridge1 Рік тому +6

    Well I couldn't get him on the first question so let me try again.....Kudos Kurt

  • @danielspringsteen3287
    @danielspringsteen3287 8 років тому +15

    I think he means tax benefits

  • @JoeKerr420
    @JoeKerr420 Рік тому +12

    As a Libertarian I don't think people should have to ask permission from the government to love someone (aka marriage license)

  • @al-bot1094
    @al-bot1094 3 роки тому +9

    I'm with Kurt.

  • @wideawake5630
    @wideawake5630 Рік тому +5

    Bad job indeed. Not at all what he said

  • @franklinjackson3637
    @franklinjackson3637 3 роки тому +4

    Should never be a state issue. Why does the government have anything to do with marriage?

  • @WilliamBeaver-tb9nt
    @WilliamBeaver-tb9nt 4 місяці тому +1

    I'm against it 💯 percent. Marriage should be between man and woman.

  • @C0MMAND3RK33N
    @C0MMAND3RK33N 9 років тому +15

    "Are you a commie or a patriot?" that's all I'm hearing these days. "Are you with us or against us?" "Are you good or EVIL?" How's about I'm not against you so stop making me your enemy. I could care less about controlling your life so stop trying to control mine. If you can't be content with your own decisions and opinions about life and need validation from everyone else and can't stand the fact that someone's going to disagree with you, then you need to seek professional help.
    "Get a new President."
    -Snake Plissken

    • @Salakert
      @Salakert 6 років тому +1

      absolutely brilliant. insecure people seeking, as you say, validation, are just hungering to get angry at the world!

    • @akfreed6949
      @akfreed6949 Рік тому

      Never forget equality for everyone NOT JUST THE RICH . The rich never had it so good . Laws passed to benefit rich people and only the rich people .

    • @douglasmcclure9492
      @douglasmcclure9492 9 місяців тому

      Your good and right

  • @flynnparish9833
    @flynnparish9833 8 років тому +16

    you marry the person you love. it is between two consenting persons. the government shouldn't decide which two types of persons they should be in favored of being legally married.

    • @231mac
      @231mac 4 роки тому +2

      Marriage is a union _before_ GOD.

    • @ka1ta0
      @ka1ta0 4 роки тому

      @@231mac god isn't real 🥰🥰

    • @231mac
      @231mac 4 роки тому +1

      @@ka1ta0 Except He is. And this is rich coming from a person who idolizes playing pretend on a stage, lol. SMH....

    • @ka1ta0
      @ka1ta0 4 роки тому

      @@231mac ur just mad because you don't have the talent to be an actor/actress, especially not one for broadway💖💖💖

    • @231mac
      @231mac 4 роки тому +1

      @@ka1ta0 Yeah... considering you have zero clue to who I am and what I can do; combined with your infantile attempt at being passive-aggressive, I'll just have to deduce that you're simply very insecure and blame society for your lack of talent. Toodles, cupcake! ;)

  • @johnhud2536
    @johnhud2536 Рік тому +2

    Hahahahha Kurt and Goldie have been living without a ring for 30 years

  • @jamesfarrington9030
    @jamesfarrington9030 Рік тому +2

    My top five 5 favorite actors.

  • @Salakert
    @Salakert 6 років тому +7

    Yes, BRILLIANT! Consistent libertarian!Does not matter who decides to marry or get shacked up, it is none of the regimes business to decide who should do what! As Kurt said, they got it messed up! Celebrating constitutional violations and selling themselves out to a let a regime decide how ANYone should live!

  • @timehaley
    @timehaley 10 місяців тому +1

    That's one for the books.

  • @smc1942
    @smc1942 2 роки тому +3

    This is why journalism isn't respected....
    Notice at the end, how she tries to twist his words into being against marriage in general???
    Kurt NEVER said anything like that!!!
    He was stating how Laws are written concerning marriage. And how the Law gives special, specific benefits to married people over unmarried people. (There is an Industry in Divorce Courts alone!)
    He's saying there should be _no difference_ in the Law between married and unmarried people.
    But "journalist" love to twist words!!! Which is why I hold them in _complete contempt._

    • @TraipsingThruFilms
      @TraipsingThruFilms  2 роки тому +1

      interesting way to interpret the exchange - but you are correct that some journalist, like Fox News should be held in contempt. Thank you.

    • @smc1942
      @smc1942 2 роки тому +1

      @@TraipsingThruFilms ;
      It's not just fox, and you know it. The entire Industry is owned by 5 families! They control ALL of American Media; tv, movies, radio, and print!
      Read the article "The Illusion of Choice", and bear in mind, when it was written, 6 families owned it all. Today, as I said, it's 5. There is good reason they all sound the same; they all use the same script!!
      If you want to know the Oligarchs who own them, you will have to dig through layer upon layer of companies, but you can find them. And if you cross reference them with the major backers of a certain political party, you'll learn the world is not what you've been told! I did! You just have to want to look.
      But cut the 🐂💩 that fox is the only bad one! _They're ALL rotten to the core!!!_
      I don't like having my words twisted either!
      SMH 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

    • @punisher67100
      @punisher67100 2 роки тому +3

      And CNN and CBS and ABC and MSNBC and every last one of them. They all have there little ax to grind.

    • @joeibarra4134
      @joeibarra4134 Рік тому

      @@TraipsingThruFilms And you, dummy

  • @wingitprod
    @wingitprod 3 роки тому +3

    Kurt doesn't pull punches.

  • @sarahhodges3866
    @sarahhodges3866 5 років тому +6

    Love my Kurt

  • @Cybopath
    @Cybopath 11 років тому +4

    Why do people ask actors questions like this and worse why do audiences judge actors on their beliefs? If an actor is good, he's good that's it! It doesn't matter if he agrees with your political views. If a baker thought differently from you would you stop buying his bread?

    • @Salakert
      @Salakert 6 років тому

      unfortunately they demand he bake what he doesn't want to ;(

    • @akfreed6949
      @akfreed6949 Рік тому +1

      I agree . Listen to the commentaries with John Carpenter and Kurt Russell . Kurt stated his libertarianism in a commentary and John talked about him being more liberal but they're still the best of friends .

  • @KalaschniKlown
    @KalaschniKlown 20 днів тому

    Even as someone who openly supports the rights of all sorts of sexualities and gender identities, I do think it’s a bit strange asking Kurt for his input.
    From what I’m seeing here, he knows it’s not any of his business to speak about and that’s probably the most respectful way to put it.

  • @butchknouse8316
    @butchknouse8316 9 років тому +1

    I think this should be decided at the state level, BUT, the states that don't allow it must recognize gay marriages from other states.

  • @jpx8793
    @jpx8793 3 роки тому +2

    Kurt rocks.

  • @nicolejennings8389
    @nicolejennings8389 Рік тому +2

    Kurt isn't even married lol. He's been dating Goldie for 50 years.

    • @sydwelglobal1439
      @sydwelglobal1439 5 місяців тому

      They’re not dating! They’re life partners genuise😂

  • @rcadenow7543
    @rcadenow7543 Рік тому

    the Snake...a legend.

  • @joeyjosephs
    @joeyjosephs 6 місяців тому

    What he means is the word equality should be taking out of it

  • @dalenope5237
    @dalenope5237 8 місяців тому +1

    Bad reporter....practice on friends/family for awhile....get the nuances down before interviewing pros.

  • @neildummer9313
    @neildummer9313 Місяць тому

    Help Kurt Russell keeps on making good comments to tell the truth about how it really isn’t life. It’s too much political crap too many people complaining young generation is whining too much.

  • @ronaldjoness6289
    @ronaldjoness6289 9 місяців тому

    💯 Agree 💯

  • @schmellyfannie6871
    @schmellyfannie6871 7 років тому +3

    Seems like a roundabout way of saying 'no'
    Political correctness strikes again.

  • @joedavis6524
    @joedavis6524 9 років тому +3

    It was a bad jump, but it was actually two jumps. a) That because you don't get a gov't advantage, he therefore thinks marriage is pointless/bad and b) That he thinks his point of view should be imposed on everyone else.

    • @Salakert
      @Salakert 6 років тому +1

      Where did you get that? He said NONE should get an advantage and never even entered into imposing

    • @ambroseburnside5764
      @ambroseburnside5764 6 років тому +3

      Yeah, but he doesn't. She asked for his opinion, and he gave his opinion on the subject. Not really imposing his view point on everyone else. He just doesn't give a fuck about marriage.

  • @neildummer9313
    @neildummer9313 Місяць тому

    And Mary it should be only between a man and a woman like God meet us to be in there should not be any doctors giving sex changes to people over 18 but don’t let them make their own choices under 18 which is very disgusting and should be against the law, whoever made these laws that you put into prisonmen and women getting body parts changed it’s very disgusting

  • @douglashandy908
    @douglashandy908 6 місяців тому

    Talk about aging gracefully OMG,he could make a straight man turn gay lol just not me lol😂

  • @iusedyourtowel6765
    @iusedyourtowel6765 10 місяців тому

    Yes, but he dodges the fact that heterosexual couples did get benefits and homosexual couples did not. Well played.

  • @TraipsingThruFilms
    @TraipsingThruFilms  11 років тому +2

    while he's talking hypothetically, gay families & their children are being denied 1100 civil rights and protections, and do not have his "advantage" of a choice.

    • @Salakert
      @Salakert 6 років тому +1

      denied by whom? the state...why depend on their validation. There are plenty of homosexuals today (and friends) who can provide a support group. That is enough

    • @231mac
      @231mac 4 роки тому +2

      Absolute bullshit. Ever wonder why you haven't amassed even _one_ like in over 6 years? Smh...