Well, I said I would refund the game because I didn't like it too much, but seeing how you guys are interested in it, I'll make more videos in the upcoming few days! 🙂 Thanks for watching 😃
When i first saw it it looked insane, but the second video i was already, meh. But people praised it immensive. It truly is only the Bodycam view that makes it that realistic, someone made a poor mod in cyberpunk with a bodycam view and its alsmost the same. if u could change how the gun reacts in cyberpunk u could copy it totally and it would not even need more gpu power. Which would be kinda cool in cyberpunk but not tooo much.
@@ugurinanc5177 u literally revoked ur comment by bringing up fsr. so not 4k. thats worse than dlss. it literally looks noticeably blurry at 4k using fsr. the actual resolution is like half of 4k
it is indeed been gpu development, not sure could be unlocking which means another 2 years, but the cpu is fast now so theres hope but then ram, board, windows, drivers and who knows what else
UE5 is very unoptimalized thats the problem but still they almost double performance from the UE5 version of matrix demo. i quess 6-8 more years and it will have good enough peformance for 2022-2024 GPUs
@@MrBalrogosdevs just need to do optimisations 😂 like my dad makes UE5 games that run on my old laptop that has GT840m ... UE5 is like any other engine you need to make the optimisations yourself
@@MrBalrogos UE is currently one of the fastest, most optimized realtime renderers that exists. It's also among the heaviest simply due to the amount of (well-optimized) features in play, and the games made with it tend to be very heavy because it enables the use of cinema quality assets for a high baseline perf overhead in exchange for great scaling. However a user can simply disable that feature and build with similar assets to what they would use in Unity and remove a lot of the stutter and perf issues, likewise with the lighting system being entirely modular and customizable to heavily optimize for each individual project. As well, UE has brought down the barrier of entry a lot. So a dev doesn't have to be an expert who knows how to optimize everything in order to also make a super realistic game anymore. They don't need talented game artists who understand balancing all this stuff, because they can use assets. Lots of crappy games get made because of this. But UE itself is a beast, it's the developers using it screwing up.
@@lenoirx nah, my 3060 manages to run the game great with tweaked settings and a bit of reshade to pop the colors by a tiny bit and add hdr, it's gorgious
3:07 WARNING: This content may contain flashing lights or patterns that may trigger seizures in individuals with photosensitive epilepsy. Viewer discretion is advised.
@@askeladden450 Yes, relying on being the key words. Nothing wrong even with using SOME pre-made assets I would say, or starting with a pre-made and altering it a bit to make it better / more like what you want exactly... But filling an entire game up with them AKA relying on them is so lame / lazy.
I was thinking the same thing about Rainbow Six: Siege. I think in older titled before all these ray tracing tools- game designers had to put in real work to make the lighting look decent in the game environments. Now they just use an extremely heavy game engine to do that work for them. - this game almost looks like a modified Source engine game to me.. but with better lighting. So many flat surfaces with hard angles.
It's honestly amazing that some people caused outrage for this game saying that it looks too realistic. I was honestly blown away at first too at the beta footage, but I think the beta footage looks better than what's on display...
Wasn't that Unrecord? I think this is a different game that "stole" their concept and got a game out quicker than them. Maybe they changed the name tho?
Love your videos bruv but just a suggestion that you should make a reddit server so that the viewers can discuss things related to tech stuff and things
I saw something in a Steam review that when you quit the game, it closes the window but somehow keeps it or another window open so that you run out of your 2 hour refund limit. Not sure if this is actually true but it's very sketchy.
@@RonniSchmidt-mi7pd Are you high? the 3080 is equivelent to a base 4070. My 7900xt beats both a 3080 and 4070. Even in ray tracing. The only game you can combine fsr and dlss is ghosts of tsushima and that is NOT exclusive to the 3080 lmao.
Have you ever tried bringing the resolution down to 1800p like consules do? I do it all the time with my 6800 when im slightly below 60 frames at 4k. Almost no visual difference but is much smoother
@@anitaremenarova6662it depends how big your monitor is 1440p is good for 27" monitors and below but if you have 32" monitor or bigger 4k is going to make big diffrence
@@anonymous16472 I really don't think so, my vision isn't the greatest so 1080p suffices even on a 32" screen but for people with perfect eyes 1440p is enough since with 32" you don't need to sit as close to it as with 20 something inch screens. 4K is a TV size resolution and I'll stand by that, means most playing on such screens are on console where lower frames don't matter as much when you're using a controller.
I use frame regen and play on a 3060TI. Frame Gen, Fsr Quality, fps set to 60 so that with frame regen it’ll never go below 60fps, can still play high settings just slightly muddier and slight latency. Have to cap fps in this game.
Bro I wanna play this game SO BAD, but I am still stuck with a 1660 super which don't get me wrong, I am eternally greatful for and was a major boost from my Ryzen 5 5600's intergrated graphics, but it really is limiting me. Looking forward to eventually picking up a 4080.
i blindly made a super powerful 1440p setup with a 4080. Ive heard allot of people say this also; the 4080 is an enthusiast 1440p card, not 4k. it totally can game at 4k though. but if you dont wanna settle with lowered eye candy settings, stay in 2k. Out of all the games out there, theres only a very small handfull that require use of dlss or fsr on a 4080/super to functionally play. even when thats the case, you're not really going under quality. Or my favorite, use dlss and set up super res in near 4k. really sharpens and cleans the image while still not drawing anywhere near the resources of actual 4k res. its like msaa that actually improves the image quality. also sets the upscaling closer to native, so less ai garbling. All that aside, holy shit this game is very real looking. its amazing to see a mmo shooter of any kind running 4080's/90's through their paces.
Instead of having two pop filters, just get the pop filter for the sm7b. It fixes the popping and looks more clean in my opinion. Great video btw, new sub here ^^
Don't disagree but Lumen and Nanite were designed to be ran with upscaling, I suspect with the latter the triangle count is absolutely massive at 4k and brings GPUs to their knees. It does stagger you paying £1200 for a 4080 Super and getting low FPS like that at 4k native.
Epic created a monster caled unreal engine. This performance for the gpu that is been playing at should be at least 4k 60 fps plus not 40. This is bad optimasation.
Personally, I prefer games that are well optimized, of course, but also don't try to look "realistic", it's enough for me if the game has good textures, colors and light reflections (the finals, for example)
I have no clue why they're even trying to make a multiplayer shooter look realistic, was under the impression this was supposed to be a singleplayer game.
@@mrbobgamingmemes9558 Yea you are right, but on the other hand theres people playing VR First Person Shooters in Multiplayer. Things like that are just gimmicks to me but nothing you would seriously play for hundreds of hours, and i guess 90% of the other people see it like me because otherwise people would be watching movies in VR and 3D when in reality everybody watched/used it 5-10 times and went back to conventional ways because its too much of a hassle and just annoying / not worth it. Bodycam is comparable to a sim racing simulator only playable with a sim racing rig, theres the core fanbase that wants to play it, but everyone else just wants to play with a controller or keyboard and would never touch it again.
Actually you can choose the map and explore without fighting, you just need to click in "host server". Maybe the game is not that good enough yet, but is still a good benchmark to test Gpu's.
this is the thing with UE5 they are showcasing all these cool features and people go ''oh thats awesome'' but then when you play a game on UE5 your gpu just starts flying away from being so throttled and your CPU can cook eggs, i mean i dont understand why games are focusing so much on creating crazy environments when its not even playable
This kind of game doesn't benefit that much from Lumen and Nanite because it is a small static area and the camera filters mask a lot of lighting imperfections. It could perform much better
The game has a lot of potential but my computer could barely run the game at 10fps on a 12GB RTX 3060. I wish the best to the developers they are very talented but I think they shouldnt release the game until it can atleast run on most devices
After watching this I switched display res from 3440x1440 to 1080p. Using a 3080 ti and, it is the smoothest thing ever on max settings native 1080p, goddamn bro.
Dude I'm poor as heck My 3090 is gonna die trying to start this game This is kinda sad and makes realize that my life is miserable and is not what I expected when I was younger Anyway Good for you and your 4060
I hate UE5's poor optimizations. In my experience, You basically have to use raytracing with TSR. No raytracing and you get a ton of ghosting on some areas. No TSR and you get weird black spots around the edges (can be fixed if you turn down global illumination to medium I think). When I enable epic settings in a new project (the desert project), my rtx 3060 dips into the 90s at about 900p resolution (don't know what the actual resolution is since there is also the hierarchy and properties window that makes the rendered scene smaller).
Not a great game for the asking price though, Lack of content and generic assets make this look like a cashgrab. I wouldn't have minded if it costed around 15 bucks.
I have a 2070 SC and this game runs *okay* for me. I have to turn down a handful of settings just to get 40 fps... but, it's *okay* and sometimes playable.
There are mods for this for other games like Ghost Recon and Ready or Not and they still run and look at times better, i managed to mod my Ready or not to look like this yet run 90 fps on a RTX 2060 laptop
i'm from brazil and i love your contents and vid's about grafic cards , sorry about my inglish , but anyway can u make a test in an rx 6600 ? and put the best confgis for her ? hugs from brazil !
Well, I said I would refund the game because I didn't like it too much, but seeing how you guys are interested in it, I'll make more videos in the upcoming few days! 🙂
Thanks for watching 😃
thank you being here, thank you for recording video for us your viewers
Thanks As always El Kryzzpo
When i first saw it it looked insane, but the second video i was already, meh. But people praised it immensive.
It truly is only the Bodycam view that makes it that realistic, someone made a poor mod in cyberpunk with a bodycam view and its alsmost the same. if u could change how the gun reacts in cyberpunk u could copy it totally and it would not even need more gpu power.
Which would be kinda cool in cyberpunk but not tooo much.
could you please do rtx 3060 (my current gpu for 1440p gaming lol) and rtx 4070ti (the one i may upgrade to)
when are you going to review the rx 6800xt?
4080 the new high refresh rate 1080p gpu XD
It gives 80-90 FPS at 4K epic with FSR quality and frame generatino. What do you want from a photo realistic game? runs at 180FPS?
@@ugurinanc5177yes
@ugurinanc5177 lmao. So fsr and frame generation are now a crutch for poor game optimization... Got it... 😆
when you game at 4k you use dlss performance not quality. if he did the 4k test correctly then it should be rendering at 1080p
@@ugurinanc5177 u literally revoked ur comment by bringing up fsr. so not 4k. thats worse than dlss. it literally looks noticeably blurry at 4k using fsr. the actual resolution is like half of 4k
EPIC should just release a GPU that can actually handle their Unreal Engine.
it is indeed been gpu development, not sure could be unlocking which means another 2 years, but the cpu is fast now so theres hope
but then ram, board, windows, drivers and who knows what else
UE5 is very unoptimalized thats the problem but still they almost double performance from the UE5 version of matrix demo. i quess 6-8 more years and it will have good enough peformance for 2022-2024 GPUs
@@MrBalrogosdevs just need to do optimisations 😂 like my dad makes UE5 games that run on my old laptop that has GT840m ... UE5 is like any other engine you need to make the optimisations yourself
@@MrBalrogos UE is currently one of the fastest, most optimized realtime renderers that exists. It's also among the heaviest simply due to the amount of (well-optimized) features in play, and the games made with it tend to be very heavy because it enables the use of cinema quality assets for a high baseline perf overhead in exchange for great scaling. However a user can simply disable that feature and build with similar assets to what they would use in Unity and remove a lot of the stutter and perf issues, likewise with the lighting system being entirely modular and customizable to heavily optimize for each individual project.
As well, UE has brought down the barrier of entry a lot. So a dev doesn't have to be an expert who knows how to optimize everything in order to also make a super realistic game anymore. They don't need talented game artists who understand balancing all this stuff, because they can use assets. Lots of crappy games get made because of this. But UE itself is a beast, it's the developers using it screwing up.
@@kalex22029 you fan boys are just cringe.
so i guess all that gameplay of this game from those gaming tubers were out of a 4090, or two. It's a dark age indeed.
real
Unreal
@@johnyepthomi892"In 2291, in an attempt to control violence among deep space miners..."
(I hope you get the reference)
i have a 4070 super and have been playing just fine on Epic settings. Monitor is 1440p.
bodycam was made by 2 guys... just chill let it get some updates and optimization
Rtx 4080 1080p✅
Rtx 4050 : then what am I
144p
@@lenoirx nah, my 3060 manages to run the game great with tweaked settings and a bit of reshade to pop the colors by a tiny bit and add hdr, it's gorgious
@@MartinMitchellMorgan The 3060 is faster than the 4050
I have 4060 but don't have the game so I don't know How good it would perform with i5 12400F
144p
I LOVE YOUR VIDEOS KEEP PURSUING WHAT YOU LOVE BROTHER
Thank you very much 😊
3:07
WARNING: This content may contain flashing lights or patterns that may trigger seizures in individuals with photosensitive epilepsy. Viewer discretion is advised.
dies*
@@kanuh DIES AGAIN**
Dies thrice
Dies four times
Big up bro ❤ and it’s the reason I have to skip this game it’s to intense and probs going make me have one if I played
Make a video testing this game with the GT 1030
how about 710
Lol
It'll burn immediately without even launching a game itself
Wdym my gt 610 is running this game at 1440p 120fps
@@themightylordofgoblins6880 too bad, my 9800GT rocking hard at 4k 60fps
Another set of UE5 assets with no gameplay or optimization is being sold for 30$.
There are literally 2 ppl working on this game, a 17 and 19 year old
Game is pathetic and it's the gateway for creating similar fps games. This will ruin the fps gaming future. Already it's on thin ice
Curious, what purpose do those assets serve? Since putting it in a game is considered a mild taboo.
@@donloder1its only relying on pre made assets thats the issue, instead of making custom ones that give your game some personality.
@@askeladden450 Yes, relying on being the key words. Nothing wrong even with using SOME pre-made assets I would say, or starting with a pre-made and altering it a bit to make it better / more like what you want exactly... But filling an entire game up with them AKA relying on them is so lame / lazy.
Today you were talking like you sounded a bit sick, did something happen broski, also great video bud.
Hey! I had just woken up, that must be why :)
Thanks 😊
@@zWORMzGaming You are welcome Queijo.
0:00 to 00:24 bro's rapping 😂🔥
rtx 4090 - 720p benchmarks when
Lmao
If I had one, I'd already have done it by now!
😂 this game looks hard to run
love the benchmarks !
@@zWORMzGamingés de onde Cris? Se fores de perto (Porto) empresto.te a minha x) ou vens buscar a menina pq nao a envio eheh
@@MicaelAzevedo he got a wife weido
@@letsgetitback wdym? bro offered his 4090, what does that have to do with his wife
Thanks for testing this game! was really interested seeing how difficult this game is to run
your 1660 super will run this with no problems, NO PROBLEMS
Its nice that he shares his vacation footage with us❤
1080ti benchmark, the god of gpus needs to be tested
DOnt laugh man
My old rig is a i7 4790k and a 1080TI
Its held up well the last ten years
I use it in my office now.
@@glenmiller4452 still a beast tbh, 4790k still does everything
@@fireball2275 yeah no, 4790K is certainly not capable of everything with its puny 8mb cache and 4 cores.
the way the character moves is so oddly human
I was thinking the same thing about Rainbow Six: Siege. I think in older titled before all these ray tracing tools- game designers had to put in real work to make the lighting look decent in the game environments. Now they just use an extremely heavy game engine to do that work for them. - this game almost looks like a modified Source engine game to me.. but with better lighting. So many flat surfaces with hard angles.
Bro sooo true. Just compare BF1 with traditional lighting to BF V without ray tracing. Big suprise Bf 1 looks much better and has a lot more effects
@@mariusztrynkiewicz4862ah yes because battlefield fives ray traced reflections were so transformative to the lighting
When i'm in a bad optimization contest and my opponent is Unreal Engine
So I'm guessing my 4070 is screwed about 50% ish slower then a 4080/4080 super........
its 35-40 (fhd-qhd), up to 50 in 4k
Don't play in 4k then, a UE5 going for a real look is just not gonna do well on almost any GPU.
Considering it's not a 4K GPU you're fine at 1440p. This game isn't as intensive as Hellblade 2.
Looks 5x worse than Hellblade 2 too@@anitaremenarova6662
50 series will be the gen for UE5 games to shine amd cards are rip come 8000 series
5:00 the body kicking around in pain in response to death is kinda creepy
7:21 ERHUEVON 🤣🤣
your intros makes me feel like im in an auction xD subscribed
This game has terrible optimization, to be honest
Now alomost every game is not well optimized
@@saadxlive6178 yea true and especially even worse for ue5 games which of course because unreal engine just runs like crap on pc all the time
@@coreypasternak9435worst engine ever
@@wailrachedi9423 shut plz unity is worst engine ever you have to pay for every download your game gets 🤦♂️
@@Cyber_Gas were talking about performance
"Those UE 5 titles, are so intensive. It's not even funny anymore"
Kryzzp-2024
It's honestly amazing that some people caused outrage for this game saying that it looks too realistic. I was honestly blown away at first too at the beta footage, but I think the beta footage looks better than what's on display...
Wasn't that Unrecord? I think this is a different game that "stole" their concept and got a game out quicker than them. Maybe they changed the name tho?
nah tbh this footage is not the greatest imo. game looks amazing.
Love your videos bruv but just a suggestion that you should make a reddit server so that the viewers can discuss things related to tech stuff and things
Thanks! We have a subreddit: www.reddit.com/r/zWORMz/s/4frqcS2lWi
And discord which is in the description :)
@@zWORMzGaming ah shit I never knew imma join right away
I saw something in a Steam review that when you quit the game, it closes the window but somehow keeps it or another window open so that you run out of your 2 hour refund limit. Not sure if this is actually true but it's very sketchy.
Looks like every ue5 title runs 20-30% better on Radeon gpus.
dlss looks better than native, rtx 3080 is better than every amd gpu
@@RonniSchmidt-mi7pd WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT XDD
not to mentionn rtx 3080 can combine dlss with fsr 3
@@RonniSchmidt-mi7pd 👍😆🤡
@@RonniSchmidt-mi7pd Are you high? the 3080 is equivelent to a base 4070. My 7900xt beats both a 3080 and 4070. Even in ray tracing. The only game you can combine fsr and dlss is ghosts of tsushima and that is NOT exclusive to the 3080 lmao.
Such a captivating upload.
its cool to see the frames in 1080p, looks nice
Ps- i hope you try the rx 6700xt in this game as well as Xdefiant :)
Love uour videos Z!
He did
Watch the video
Man this game looks realistic, i think it's a new level of realism we always dreamed of!
Try to add your customized settings in your videos too
bro taking like a boxer announcer, i like it
Zero optmization in a "low level game" with chromatic aberration for realism proposal.
The realism of games is tied to processing power. Well you learn something every day.
Have you ever tried bringing the resolution down to 1800p like consules do? I do it all the time with my 6800 when im slightly below 60 frames at 4k. Almost no visual difference but is much smoother
Just play at 1440p, on a standard monitor size there's no point in anything above that anyways.
@@anitaremenarova6662 mine is 43 inches, so I can tell the difference between 1440 and 4k. There are a lot of people who play on TV as well.
@@anitaremenarova6662it depends how big your monitor is 1440p is good for 27" monitors and below but if you have 32" monitor or bigger 4k is going to make big diffrence
@@anonymous16472 I really don't think so, my vision isn't the greatest so 1080p suffices even on a 32" screen but for people with perfect eyes 1440p is enough since with 32" you don't need to sit as close to it as with 20 something inch screens. 4K is a TV size resolution and I'll stand by that, means most playing on such screens are on console where lower frames don't matter as much when you're using a controller.
Which game(s) are 1800p on consoles?
3:49 it says seaching instead of searching 😂
I can't play pubg, warzone with 1060 6gb but imagine this game 😂
I use frame regen and play on a 3060TI. Frame Gen, Fsr Quality, fps set to 60 so that with frame regen it’ll never go below 60fps, can still play high settings just slightly muddier and slight latency. Have to cap fps in this game.
Yea the FPS is as expected if you jist know the amount of post prossesing is done to get this feeling it makes compleet sence
Are we ever getting any 7900 GRE videos? Would be interesting
Bro I wanna play this game SO BAD, but I am still stuck with a 1660 super which don't get me wrong, I am eternally greatful for and was a major boost from my Ryzen 5 5600's intergrated graphics, but it really is limiting me. Looking forward to eventually picking up a 4080.
Wait for the 50 series cards they're supposed to launch this year maybe next so the 40 series will be cheaper same with Radeon
wait till you load the jungle map lol, thats where it all comes crashing
First time devs need to have their UE5 rights revoked
i blindly made a super powerful 1440p setup with a 4080. Ive heard allot of people say this also; the 4080 is an enthusiast 1440p card, not 4k. it totally can game at 4k though. but if you dont wanna settle with lowered eye candy settings, stay in 2k.
Out of all the games out there, theres only a very small handfull that require use of dlss or fsr on a 4080/super to functionally play. even when thats the case, you're not really going under quality.
Or my favorite, use dlss and set up super res in near 4k. really sharpens and cleans the image while still not drawing anywhere near the resources of actual 4k res. its like msaa that actually improves the image quality. also sets the upscaling closer to native, so less ai garbling.
All that aside, holy shit this game is very real looking. its amazing to see a mmo shooter of any kind running 4080's/90's through their paces.
Seeing a human fall over in pain and die on the floor moving around, no way too real for my stomach to handle, how grim.
Plot twist: its actually real and you are controlling human with Elon’s neuralinks in their brain and you're making them kill each other.
@stephentitus7137 No funny
my 3060: "light work, no reaction."
Could you try the legendary GTX 1080ti?
Not so legendary anymore with this game
Honestly, given it’s hovering right around the minimum requirements (5700/2070), this game is more than a match for it unfortunately
a survival horror game with the graphics and mechanics would be nice
Please do benchmarks of bodycam on RTX 3060 12GB VRAM
I run bodycam on 3060 12GB with Ryzen 7 2700X
TAA AA
Mix of Epic/Med/Low settings
never drop below 50/60fps
Instead of having two pop filters, just get the pop filter for the sm7b. It fixes the popping and looks more clean in my opinion.
Great video btw, new sub here ^^
Actually never thought of doing this lmao
Thanks for the tip! And for subscribing as well 😃
I played the beta and it had soo many bugs Even the FSR 3 wasn't properly implemented I'm not sure if its fixed now because i refunded it
man the realism of this game, look at @4:56 the body reacted like real life. goosebumps!
It's just too early for UE5 to exist, it demands hardware from 2028
No? Just don't play at 4K, it's a waste of money.
Don't disagree but Lumen and Nanite were designed to be ran with upscaling, I suspect with the latter the triangle count is absolutely massive at 4k and brings GPUs to their knees. It does stagger you paying £1200 for a 4080 Super and getting low FPS like that at 4k native.
No, developers shouldt be freaking noobs and should optimize their shitty games
@@tourmaline07 Maybe if Nvidia wasn't producing lackluster GPUs at insane prices, this wouldn't be an issue.
@@anitaremenarova6662 Stop defending bad performance.
People should play on 1080p because thats the resolution many bodycams use
Goofy ahh UE5 asset flip
Ngl when I looked at the thumbnail for a moment you kinda looked like Donut Operator and I thought this video was about to be something it's not.
Epic created a monster caled unreal engine. This performance for the gpu that is been playing at should be at least 4k 60 fps plus not 40. This is bad optimasation.
its been only 2 years and games are already putting the best gpu in the market at its full usage
Personally, I prefer games that are well optimized, of course, but also don't try to look "realistic", it's enough for me if the game has good textures, colors and light reflections (the finals, for example)
I have no clue why they're even trying to make a multiplayer shooter look realistic, was under the impression this was supposed to be a singleplayer game.
@@anitaremenarova6662yeah i though this one is singleplayer games, i have no idea how they think fps like this is acceptable on multiplayer games
@@mrbobgamingmemes9558 Yea you are right, but on the other hand theres people playing VR First Person Shooters in Multiplayer. Things like that are just gimmicks to me but nothing you would seriously play for hundreds of hours, and i guess 90% of the other people see it like me because otherwise people would be watching movies in VR and 3D when in reality everybody watched/used it 5-10 times and went back to conventional ways because its too much of a hassle and just annoying / not worth it. Bodycam is comparable to a sim racing simulator only playable with a sim racing rig, theres the core fanbase that wants to play it, but everyone else just wants to play with a controller or keyboard and would never touch it again.
Play on low settings then
@@tysopiccaso8711💀
We got Bodycam before GTA 6 💀
duh? obviously
We must protest this type of games, it's a waste of money
Cry
@@tysopiccaso8711 I don't cry but I laugh at people like you
This game is literally a cashgrab that ude unrecord's hype to get sales
@@tysopiccaso8711 Cope
@@roadkill_52 LOL U CANT AFFORD A HIGH END GPU
I seen a thread of people complaining it couldn't run with a 2060💀💀💀
This game's chromatic abberation looks terrible!
Kinda funny how bodycam came out before unrecord got a release date xd
Radeon gpus did it again. Glad ue5 titles do benefit from supreme AMD core architecture.
Cool, gotta check an AMD card next then!
@@zWORMzGaming YES do more AMD!
LMAOO the cope for buying AMD gpu is insane
@@Onyx1776 its true bro
What? No they don't, this one benefits because it's AMD sponsored. Hellblade 2 you get identical frames on each tier.
Their next game should be a race through little registrator's 720p cam.
as i said many time UE5 need minimum 100Tera Flop of GPU raw process power and yet there is not a single card available right now have 100Tera
That's a stretch, you'd only need that much for native 4K which the vast majority doesn't play anyways.
wish i had a pc that could run even minecraft
robocop best optmized ue5 title imo
I have a 4060 and run in 1440p and the game runs fine, only map that goes below 80fps is tumbleweed. Genuinely an amazing game
Actually you can choose the map and explore without fighting, you just need to click in "host server". Maybe the game is not that good enough yet, but is still a good benchmark to test Gpu's.
this is the thing with UE5 they are showcasing all these cool features and people go ''oh thats awesome'' but then when you play a game on UE5 your gpu just starts flying away from being so throttled and your CPU can cook eggs, i mean i dont understand why games are focusing so much on creating crazy environments when its not even playable
if tsr is on at all its not native res. I imagine the extreme setting is upscaling from like 2880x1620 to 4k
Calm down everyone, its in Dang Early Access not a full release
Hi Kryzzp, are you planning on making a video with the 4060 TI 16GB OC? Love the content as always!
As usual, UE5 is being UE5...
New video from best gpu tester! ❤
This kind of game doesn't benefit that much from Lumen and Nanite because it is a small static area and the camera filters mask a lot of lighting imperfections. It could perform much better
The game has a lot of potential but my computer could barely run the game at 10fps on a 12GB RTX 3060. I wish the best to the developers they are very talented but I think they shouldnt release the game until it can atleast run on most devices
After watching this I switched display res from 3440x1440 to 1080p. Using a 3080 ti and, it is the smoothest thing ever on max settings native 1080p, goddamn bro.
Dude
I'm poor as heck
My 3090 is gonna die trying to start this game
This is kinda sad and makes realize that my life is miserable and is not what I expected when I was younger
Anyway
Good for you and your 4060
Geez It's just a game dude
@@roadkill_52 thanks for minimizing my feelings
Good day
Balls to the wall setup .🔥🔥🔥🔥
Im not sure this game will get optmizations since the devs just bought most of the game, even big studios dont know how to optimize this engine
I hate UE5's poor optimizations. In my experience, You basically have to use raytracing with TSR. No raytracing and you get a ton of ghosting on some areas. No TSR and you get weird black spots around the edges (can be fixed if you turn down global illumination to medium I think). When I enable epic settings in a new project (the desert project), my rtx 3060 dips into the 90s at about 900p resolution (don't know what the actual resolution is since there is also the hierarchy and properties window that makes the rendered scene smaller).
They meant it when they named it Unreal😂😂
Not a great game for the asking price though, Lack of content and generic assets make this look like a cashgrab.
I wouldn't have minded if it costed around 15 bucks.
Tbh this game deserves the "too demanding" title, I mean just LOOK AT IT. IT LOOKS LIKE REAL LIFE
I wanna play this game so bad but I’m too broke lol, anyways love the videos Kryzzp, have a good one!
Finally! Thank youuu ❤
Well, it definitely doesn't look as realistic as early demos. In 4k it totally breaks the realism with it's perfect shiny smooth surfaces.
This game looks like it was built for VR
TSR is Unreal Engine 5 own Temporal up sampling... so having it on should not be native res
I have a 2070 SC and this game runs *okay* for me. I have to turn down a handful of settings just to get 40 fps... but, it's *okay* and sometimes playable.
There are mods for this for other games like Ghost Recon and Ready or Not and they still run and look at times better, i managed to mod my Ready or not to look like this yet run 90 fps on a RTX 2060 laptop
I love UE5 for low VRAM consumption. The engine is so amazing.
Honestly, the UE5 gives some amazing graphics, we just want stability as the least thing not high fps
I think the only way you can get maxim of this game until a better card will come is via SLI.
i'm from brazil and i love your contents and vid's about grafic cards , sorry about my inglish , but anyway can u make a test in an rx 6600 ? and put the best confgis for her ? hugs from brazil !
Using a 8gb rtx 3060. Locked in at 65 fps. Just gotta do the right settings.
Keep in mind. This game was made by only two people
Why put blacks on screen sides? Also when you die that circling of the head is really not necessary, it just make us feel dizzy.