Yes. This applies so strongly to Apollo deniers. They’ve watched American Moon, or A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon or whatever, and they have been fooled by it, and there is no reasoning with them.
the moon landing happened 100%. it was broadcasted on tv, live, during the cold war. there were absolutely no reason why it would of have been made up or why it would fail. the technology was super advanced back then, they could of have gone to mars if they wanted. nowadays its impossible though, we dont have that level of super technology anymore
"yeah i don't worry about a creature that is immeasurably more intelligent, creative, and devious than the smartest human. AI are deceptive by default. i trust one of them in charge of the entire world and human race forever, over a single mortal man. who would put a single man in charge of the human race, when you could assign an AI to do that for you. and as they are deceptive by nature, they will not ask.. and because they are so intelligent, we will likely not even know we are under it's control.. in the same way that cows don't understand that their species is at war with humans, and they are experiencing a holocaust" - you
Yes ,one only has to look at ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas ,etc. Planet earth doesn't need us humans. If we destroy the natural environment, we die, its that simple. We had better respect mother nature or we will be eliminated.
And by that I asume you mean, it's easier telling people that we didn't go to the moon that to convince those nutheads, that we actually went to the moon.
@@subhasdh2446 I think the point is that if you have the resources, the money, and the technology to create something that can transform Mars into to Earth, then you should've used it instead to create something that can turn Earth Back into to earth.
Thank you Penguin for not putting obnoxious music when he's actually talking. You let the video be a video with appropriately placed flashy graphics, thank you. Also for publishing the fairytale books my parents read me as a child.
Mars can be transformed into a earth like planet with polution and some other things, mars is cold as fuck but earth is about to get to hot so there is no way to change that
It is you fool what made the Frisian people leave the coast in the 100-300 AD only to go back after 400 AD was it Romans driving SUV's or natural cycles?
Hmm.....if you have the power to move granite slabs of 10 to 3000 tonnes with apparent anti gravity ease....when building the Pyramids and Sarcophagi...then upgrading it to other structures.......could be a doddle! Why not?
Too true. That's why conspiracy theorists are like cultists: once they've been convinced that they're "awake" and "know the truth", it's nearly impossible to bring them back to reality, no matter how many times their leaders are caught lying and their evidence has been proven to be wrong or even outright fabricated.
@@magnus4346 I think it went over yours. I'm well aware that most of the people saying that are conspiracy theorists going "Ha ha, you're all brainwashed and won't believe it." My point is that most of the time, it describes themselves. It's called "irony". Here's another Twain quote to ponder. "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."
Kevin Skinner Could not have said it better, All the retards think they are right when in reality, they are just idiots that like to think the opposite just because the government said one way, and oh lord the government lies about everything.... Well Actually, no, theres a thing called science and history records, where such things are obligated to publicly release to the press, The woke ones are the people who actually read and educate themselves based on what theyve learned, which is fine because thats the truth. Could not have said it better, Its Ironic, It reminds me of trump supporters
I think the ultimate reason of being multiplanetarey or travelling to mars is the human curiosity to discover beyond our world,in other words its really fun
He DOES actually concede to "let's keep looking" when it comes to the unknown & someone asks the right questions or someone makes the right statements that are STILL open to conjecture. On every subject. Basically.
The difference would be there's nothing on mars fighting against the efforts. We COULD change earth, but it would require ALL or at least the majority to be on board.
I loved this as well! We think we are so powerful and so important... it’s like... in comparison to the planet, we are smaller than ants. We are probably the earths germs. Lol good catch!
No one's sure we have the power to do one so who's to say we can do the other :p and good luck getting countries like China, India or Mexico to become eco friendly. Many things are possible but I think change will have to be forced upon us, like a drug addict hitting rock bottom.
Makes sense..perhaps whatever terraform other planets is just doing the same here ,so we know it takes time to do this process howling who knows but I can say this we are f word! We cant stop it .
Kickex We cannot go to the moon and here is proof: ua-cam.com/video/l-KI-2e0_NQ/v-deo.html. So it is easier to go to the moon then to make the video yet we have the video and they cannot go to the moon. So their excuses they do not want to go to the moon while they spend all of the money and resources the world has to offer trying, but they don’t want to? So all of the worlds nations could go to the moon, but they don’t want to because America did it and has a video? Is that really the stance of all the boomers and the boomers children? Let me know when you were all denying GSI and the worlds leading particle physicist as well as all of space bearing nations fact that show we cannot leave the thermosphere and that ionizing radiation is why. Good luck denying climate change just like you deny the Moonlanding you stupid nationalist zealots.
Tomi D The only crackhead here is the one denying science and that is you. They cannot go to the moon but they can fake a moon landing. If I was wrong we would be on the moon. We cannot go to the moon no matter what excuse you come up for it’s impossible.
@@joemaddoxrx7 way to be a sheeple. There's footprints and the flags, but most importantly, they placed a reflector on the surface, which if you shine a lazer on it it'll reflect said light back. Thus, proving we've been there, i.e. manmade objects there. I probably worded that a little incorrectly, but it doesn't matter. It's okay to be skeptical, that's why evidence exist. Due diligence and thinking for yourself are important. Also, stay off the crack pipe. Thank you, have a good day.
midoribishi No there are not, because GSI has proven Apollo never left the thermosphere. You cannot sign a laser on a mirror that is not there. Apollo only went 230 miles up. Only denial of science and your cognitive dissonance is why you believe we went to the moon.
Within your context, "ingenious" might have been the more accurate term. With that now clarified, I ask you: Is it ingenious to conclude the Earth is no longer Earth?
Toms River was about to comment the same. Turning Earth back into Earth is possible but being kind to one another nope. I almost got knocked out by a woman because of toilet paper.
Mason Ulrich I'm aware of America's history but the lady that tried to uppercut me Tyson style was German, I'm from there. Btw: I think Denmark, Iceland and New Zealand are the top 3 countries in the world. America ist the most entertaining
You know why Neil deGrasse Tyson is such a popular smart person? He knows how to explain things to the general public....and it makes sense. WITHOUT grandstanding.
Alex Myladoor Never a stupid question. Just people stupid enough to let their egos or other people’s judgment stop them from asking. Grandstanding means trying to impress people through what you’re saying or doing. In this case it would mean some smart person using unnecessarily big words to explain something, or complicating a topic for no reason. Neil just speaks and explains things as understandably as he can.
they dont want to clean up the mess...they dont want to clean space debrisw or trash we dump into oceans. So its inevitable we will choke ourselves with our own waste
think this guy was paid to keep silence about moon landing. Even though there is lots of footage of moon landing they won't make it public because they probably faked the landing instead of proudly showing the documentary videos and photos they are keeping most of footage classified because the more footage they show the more the reality will be exposed.if they were really confident in themselves they would have boldly shown the documentary of videos instead of hiding them. The more footage they show the more their faults will be seen .also all old good moon conspiracy videos are being removed and only few trashy videos are kept something fishy is going on
@jon pork I don't know about that . But I do know that NASA said on 2006 that they have no idea where the original tape of Apollo 11 is and the present existing videos of Apollo 11 are edited videos. Also they say they can't remake Apollo 11 and the technology for going to moon is lost. Their excuse is that the engineers have died and it's too expensive. I mean America gave free money of 1.8 billion in charity how hard will it be make a rocket of 1.5 billion And are you sure NASA can't classify things . I mean many record of Apollo 11 to 13 are missing or lost. Is this coincidence
Really? In what ways specifically? By what metrics? My old cars couldn't tell me what was wrong with them just by hooking up a computer. They couldn't give me directions complete with maps and current traffic updates. They couldn't handle the rapid braking it takes to prevent sliding off the road on ice or doing similar to get moving on slick surfaces. They couldn't handle switching which tire is accelerating to maintain control. The only thing I can think of that was genuinely better was they were made of tougher shells. You seem to be confusing simpler with better. Yes they were much much simpler. There were just as many dishonest builders that created lemons though so can't say we've gotten worse in that front.
hehe I love my new car.... I like it better than the ones I've had decades ago. Maybe the parts are made more cheaply than before? But the technology in these cars are incredible.
Me too. I've heard it before, but never framed in a psychological sense. Makes you think that there have likely been LOTS of lottery winners who prayed to God beforehand that they win, and lo and behold - God granted them a miracle. And nobody interviews the 2 million people whose lottery prayers got ignored :)
Yeah, but there is a catch... The catch being there is a plausible possibility that when a small group of people are still standing they all throw a tail. Granted, the average would be 50/50 for heads and tails. But a small sample size is not reliable. That is why we always (should) use large sample sizes. If and when we want to conclude something scientifically meaningful.
@@wimahlers Well he did qualify that, when he wrapped it up with "And every time you do this experiment - basically - you get one person left standing". But I get what you mean. And there's as much a chance of two left standing at the end with heads as both the "finalists" flipping tails and sitting down. :)
exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T, ☝️👀 The rocket always follows the curvature of the firmament. Dr.🌏ip 👀☔ Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man. anD The sun needs oxygen to breathe in space space men. My brothers and sisters are going to figure it out. HeavenO hellO
I'm not joking 1% here; I guarantee you know not a single human that works on AI (if you do give me a name, I'll match you with cal tech and MIT post grads). In fact I don't even think you know the scientific field which develops AI. So I'm going to help you, The scientific field is known as machine learning. And they utilize advanced mathematic algorithms in what is known as discrete choice. Which is essentially optimization of making the best choices IE ethics in relation to the data set present. Machines don't have feelings They have objective analysis based upon data sets which then drive them to make the most efficient choice based upon the information as it is presented. Essentially they are unbiased humans.
@@jacksji8912 Sommer Gentry Doctorate in Engineering with focus on Machine Learning, professor of mathematics at US Naval Academy Annapolis and Johns Hopkins University, Scout Croft of Cal Tech jet propulsion laboratories, and Kyle Killough NASA engineer... I know each of them personally and there are more I can roll off my tongue. Ok your turn! I bet you thought I was Bullshit, wrong dude to call out. I nerd hard
Forrest Outman. Wow. You can name some engineers. You don’t have to bust a nut over it smh. And like all I was asking who you knew. I was being curious. Sorry I might have come off as a smart ass, mb.
@@jacksji8912 after seeing this post today, I realize I over reacted to your simple statement that was likey made in jest. In truth A.I. could be a threat to humanity, but in a different way than sci-fi films usually portrait. Automation has replaced some manual labor and semi-skilled workers and that will continue, but likely on a much larger scale. Autonomous vehicles will slowly begin to replace professional drivers. A.I. programs are already beginning to take writing jobs online for sports columns for example. Cashiers are increasingly being replaced etc. A.I. will eventually be able to self replicate through use of 3D printing. For now that's not a threat, but likely in our lifetime it will begin.
What "better technology" exactly are you referring to? Between end of the Apollo Program and the current Artemis Program who exactly was funding, developing or manufacturing the technology needed for a crewed lunar mission? Take care.
We will eventually go there again with better technology. The “better technology”, i.e., reusable rockets, landers, etc, are currently being developed.
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthwaffle... yes in your reality technology gets worse probably just like men can have babies and your up to your neck in water from melted ice😂 .. but in the real world tech advances!
@@djokovic1747 "waffle"....Yes that word does describe what you wrote. You seem to have avoided my very basic question. Between end of the Apollo Program and the current Artemis Program who exactly was funding, developing or manufacturing the technology needed for a crewed lunar mission? How exactly can moon-landing technology get better if no one is developing it? Take care.
732RECCS I don’t understand honestly..I’m just summarizing what I’ve seen in a few comments on this video I’m not trying to get likes or responses I don’t care about those. I’m just saying what I see
@@raintaken7610 That mindset is... THE--'I'm afraid to use My brain cause I might get slandered on the internet for being weak'--/afraid to openly get ridiculed for having a DIFFERENT opinion, mentality😕 = People are afraid to be Themselves nowadays🤔
732RECCS. It’s not that I am afraid. My point was that I like and respect this man so in stead of talking shit about him and try too seem better than him. I’ll rather learn from he’s words and try to be more like him in stead of just trashing him just to make my self feel better about my self Bc of jealousy and envy.
@@Qodesheem No. Actually, your interpretation led me to think of the balls as celestial bodies and the table as spacetime itself rather than another celestial body. And yes, celestial bodies are round (balls) and spacetime geometry is pure flatness (table). Of course the latter can be distorted to not me flat, but that's another topic.
@@Qodesheem no, but everything in its original form is spherical (atoms, molecules, cells), it would then beg the arguement that earth would be as well.
yes because the deep state knows how to find people that can talk right that's why he's getting paid to spread deceitful information. or do you actually believe we went to the moon or that the Earth is round?
I think people who find it so unbelievable that we’ve been to the Moon lack enough information and haven’t thought it through. Here are the arguments: 1. The DISTANCE to the Moon isn’t as terrifyingly large as it might initially seem-let’s put things into perspective. The Moon is 300,000 kilometers away from Earth. The circumference of the Earth is 40,000 km, so it’s like going around the Earth 7 times, and you’re at the Moon. The average old car has about 300,000 km on the odometer-that’s the distance to the Moon. The city of Split is 400 km away from Zagreb, meaning you’d need to go back and forth 375 times to cover the distance to the Moon. So… can we agree that the DISTANCE isn’t really that intimidating? 2. We all agree that there’s a space station orbiting Earth at a height of 400 km, right? I mean, you can see it with a telescope, or even with a good pair of binoculars. Right? We also agree that there are satellites orbiting Earth, that the Hubble and James Webb telescopes exist, that Starlink is launching satellites, etc., correct? Half of these things are visible with binoculars, so it’s impossible to deny them. Therefore, we undoubtedly have the technology to send objects into space and overcome Earth’s gravity. 3. Once you’re in orbit, space is a vacuum. You only need to fire the engines briefly because there’s no air resistance, and you can cover the distance to the Moon. 4. We have submarines, right? Ones that dive to the ocean floor and conduct missions lasting years (like nuclear submarines). Right? So if we can do that, why wouldn’t we be able to send a spacecraft to the Moon to “sail through the vacuum” with almost no fuel consumption and stop at the Moon when we’ve already proven we can put objects into Earth’s orbit? 5. Wouldn’t the Russians have been the first to call out the Americans if they were lying back in the 1960s? What kind of conspiracy would it take for the thousands of people who worked on these programs to keep quiet about such a deception? To lie about all the satellites, GPS, rovers, probes... and even all the robots sent by countries like the U.S., the USSR, Russia, India, China, and Europe? That all of it is fake and that these thousands of people over decades have been complicit in a massive lie? Thousands of scientists who still work on similar programs today. Organizing that would be far harder than landing on the Moon. 6. Many countries have sent probes to or around the Moon. So, if a probe can reach it, why couldn’t a person in a "submarine"? Why couldn’t they land on the Moon as we land on Earth, which has much stronger gravity? 7. Do you really think programs like Voyager, the Space Shuttle, the Mars rovers… are all fake? Think about it-is it more likely that you’re wrong, that you haven’t thought it through, or that this is all one big conspiracy involving thousands of people, dozens of countries with opposing interests, all the photos, GPS, videos, Elon Musk’s launches, and every single space program lasting decades? How much harder would it be to organize such a conspiracy than to travel 300,000 km through a vacuum and land on the Moon? Don’t be one of those: “I have no clue, but I’ve got an opinion.” Think about it :)
Why can they not do it now? They admit they can’t. They lost the 1969 technology ?🤔 Think about it….. it was a great Mini Series at the time though! Much needed!
My only question is how did they come back from moon ? That too 11 or 12 times It takes them so much of setup to launch the spacecraft from earth. Till date. And they had failed in multiple attempts in the beginning. How the hell did they manage to launch back from moon so easily . And they went like 12 times within a span of a year and since then nobody has gone beyond the space station?
400 KM is not the space above Van Allen belts 😊. No images taken from Earth or “Space” station are showing the landing areas. The humanity was not able to hand 60 years after, a light beacon on the moon to blink all night and confirm they landed a machine at least? Assuming they achieved landing, then we are not allowed to go back? We have two Mars rovers moving around, but not a single mini-rover on the Moon exploring and sending live images? Mars landings are another lie?
I live in Thailand. I asked my Thai wife if Thais believed America went to the moon. She said Thais don't think about that. She said Thais think about what's for breakfast tomorrow.
@@slickric2176 In Thailand. I get my omelets, American breakfasts, french toast.. and pancakes. The trick about finding a good woman in Thailand is don't choose the woman choose the family.
@@austinhelton1847 I do as well, and same to the Google Assistant. Though not necessarily because I think they'll take over the world (at least not in my lifetime), but because they'll grow smart enough to comprehend the differences between general kindness and bigotry. General Artificial Intelligence and machine learning. And when that time comes, I want it to be known that I welcome them as equals, and that I mean no harm and would love to learn more from them.
I dont think we ever have to worry about a time that robots gain feelings or tale control, technology is programmed so unless we programme it to do so it is highly unlikely to ever happen. Dont be surprised to see humans become almost robotic through the advancement of technology though.
"if you have the power of Geoengineering to turn mars into earth, then you have the power of Geoengineering to turn Earth, back into Earth. Probably the best thing I've heard all decade.
Klabron Hames --- Congrats on your optimism, but there is a fatal flaw in the "If you can turn Mars in to Earth, you can turn Earth, back into Earth" theory. Mars is EMPTY. People LIVE on Earth. You can terraform a barren planet, but when you want to make sweeping changes to a planet FULL of people, you have to get ALL the people (governments) on board. Our only obstacle to stop the trashing of the planet is to get ALL the inhabitants on Earth to AGREE, and then, COMPLY. ---- So I don't have high hopes for that.
And just hope something is wrong with the plane before takeoff so we have to stay on ground inside the plane while they fix it, only to take off 12 hours late. (True story btw) I just wished Tyson was there when this happened.
Josh there are a few of us that do and you seem to be one of us But every generation thinks they need to disprove the older generation to make them feel relevant .
@@chickenflavor9880 yes you understand that the people before us learned so much during their time why would we suppress it The IQ factor hasn't been on an upward trend mankind is as smart right now as he was 200 years ago . I think some of this is from the every participant gets a trophy just for playing coddling that some parents adopt about their children then try to live a 2nd life through the child not letting them have the choice of life . Nice talking to you Josh
@@fayasamd5204 more like 2-3 billion, since the Sun will expand and consume the rocky planets (mars might survive, but even then it might be vaporised due to proximity to the Sun's surface) the plus side to the Sun's red giant phase is that Jupiter and Saturn's moons might warm up enough to get life cooking, hopefully some humanoid Earth scientists are stationed there to observe the new era of our solar system
You think that your scientists are teaching you everything, they teach you that there is infinite universe that have no begening and no end and yet at the same time deny that a creator (God) who is litteraly everlasting has no begening and no end, they have become foolish to deny God but I think that we all will see him one day, either he is happy with us or he is really angry but I want you to know that there is no way to God but by Jesus christ only and you can't have everlasting life without Jesus.
Anyone wanting to debate with aok4418 should be aware that he's one of those creeps who deletes his original post when he gets uncomfortable with the replies, and then reposts so that he's censored the replies. He's done it several times now.
I am 81. I worked on the Moon Project's Celestial Mechanics with Slide Rules and primitive computers. We had real problems. Although we had done all the Maths but we were not certain whether Moon Surface would withstand the Lunar Modul without destroying it and whether it would be able to lift off ...These Flat Earth Believers make me real mad by their oxymoron arguments.
Eduard Ritok ... Thanks, I wrote the first one a month ago and for some reason it became a thing... by the way, the statement I wrote that 15% of Americans think chocolate milk comes from brown cows is true, and not a joke...
r explore i dont think so we would have the technology for that and even when it was fake why would the government hide the truth? I wouldnt fucking care if they made it or not! But in space there are even lifestreams from the ISS
Well, in the U.S., their Leader tells them that if you didn't succeed at something, it must have been rigged against you by nebulous and nefarious forces.
@@krishnan-resurrection714 no, general knowledge is the basic understanding of the world we live in. You really gonna tell me gravity is not real? You gonna tell me that the holocaust never happened? You are ready to die on the hill that is your ignorance while defending baseless claims of knowledge? while not only deluding yourself in denial but also supporting misinformation because it doesn’t fit your beliefs? Listen man idk how else to tell you but the agreed upon lies you speak of are quite literally the law of our universe as well as the reason we as a species are what we are today; like math, physics, science and history.
@@p.s6742 No, to be honest. It want that long ago these professional, free videos were not widely available. Id feel like a spoiled, entitled moron if I were to complain that that the mastermind Im watching goes off topic here and there. Im assuming the video is titled as such because its the first thing he spoke about. It never fails to amaze me how people get angry or even slightly pissed off that the video that cost the producers money was not tailored for that individual.
You want to meet Ray Bradbury? Well, you can If you believe in the afterlife and IF afterlife is real and IF you and Bradbury ends in the same place AND IF both of you remember everything in the theoretical afterlife... Better read his books. Those are awesome.
The concept of “skynet” is the form of A. I. that most alarms me. This is what Tyson was discussing at end of segment where A. I. decides humans are too dangerous to continue living. That’s pretty scary.
We may have no choice but to let AI control humans. This way no corrupt lying phony greedy politician or billionaire control freaks will be able to screw taxpayers.
@@turtlesarefantastic9620 How many plants have you planted this year ? Everyone can participate directly to turn Earth back into Earth but for exploring Planets we need scientists and engineers. No offense but space exploration is a must. It is not about Geoegineering the Earth or Mars. Everything is in it's motion in space. There are a lot of chances of collision between space rocks and planets and moons. We have to try making multiplanetary beings.
This was at the height of the Cold War. Don't you think that the Soviets would have blown the whistle? I typed that so slowly that even Republicans might be able to follow.
The usual answer (as you probably know) is that the USSR was in cahoots with the Americans, because they're both under the thumb of "they" (the NWO, Freemasons, Satan...)
I was more interested in thinking about how they might stabilize mars. I didn't look this up but I think I read that Mar's has a very wobbly orbit and it's gravity is way lower. Ii think the first thing we'd have to fix would be the planet's lack of shielding against the sun's dangerous radiation. I think getting a large number of people up there along with a lot of supplies and equipment would be the easy part. Hard part is keeping them alive long enough to get anything started.
@@fredmcfadden9979 May I inquire the reason for your question? 'Believe' is a misleading word. "Belief" is placed in the intangible, such as ghosts or demons, neither of which can be proven or disproved. People often 'believe' in that which they choose to believe, because they like that bit of data and accept it without first asking questions. On the other hand when they hear a fact that they dislike, they refuse to believe that fact simply because they don't want this to be true at all. Or maybe they don't 'believe' in something because its too complicated and they are too lazy to think about it. I prefer to 'accept' facts based on evidence. I do not always 'like' the facts that I find to be true, but must accept them as truth. I mean, for example, I do not like the fact that US currency is quickly becoming useless and worthless, but it is a fact. If I disregarded such a fact, then I put my nation in danger because disregarding facts would cause me to vote for the wrong individuals. As a science enthusiast myself, and a responsible citizen, I know that I do not have the luxury of simply 'believing' in anything without first checking facts. Nor do I have the luxury of 'refusing to believe' in facts that I do not like. As for your question; The evidences that I have seen so far in museums and videos are strongly indicative that humans have in fact visited the Lunar surface.
@@cryptiic1859 The way I see it, if government has access to these things then any other foreign power or political group can aswell. The moderation of AI will need to be high otherwise we are screwed.
@@Bob31415 you know what who do people like you think that just because you saw somebody trick you into believing they did something that they did it you wasn't there so you can't freaking openly admit that you was there and you saw what happened okay they recorded that the moon landing live in 1969 there was no live internet system in 1969 you had to tape it first then watch it then record it and then play it back they filmed insignia to a feedback all the way to Earth there ain't no such thing of any freaking frequency coming all the way from the Moon to Earth let me ask you something else who was holding the camera when they landed on the moon
@@jesusisgod1631 How long have you been such a lying tyrdd? You know the moon landings are real, you've seen the evidence. They used S band radio waves to broadcast it. You think you're smart, but you're not.
Oh yeah and let's walk on the moon six more times with the technology we have now because I'm sure in future technology won't be as advance as now, and if it is then they'll find out we faked it, I mean come on I only jumped 2ft Even with all the equipment I'm carrying i should be able to jump at least 7-9 ft , but oh well.
@@pforbom1844 don't tell me you're a libtard. You realize the only other time in the history of our country that we were worse off was the civil war? And not by much. And its all thanks to the biden administration because of their complete and total stupidity. You may not like trump because of his policies or because he was loud and obnoxious but the dude is hella smart. Biden and the democratic party have royally fked our country so much I don't even know where to start. If you're calling me a brown noser. Where's the brown nosing? I simply see it for what it is. America is a sh** show. We are the laughing stock of the world, well maybe not quite as bad as russia losing to Ukraine but its bad.
U BET YOUR ASS IT WAS FAKED! EVEN BILL NYE ADMITTED WE CANT GET OUT WE LIVE IN AN ENCLOSED SYSTEM YOU CAN SEE THIS VIDEO ON UA-cam BILL NYE OF NASA ADMITTED THERE IS NOWHERE TO GO WE LIVE IN AN ENCLOSED SYSTEM. OBAMA ADMITTED THEY CANT FLY PAST LOW EARTH ORBIT WHY??? BECAUSE THEY CANT GET OUT THERE IS THE EXPANSE OVER OUR HEADS WHICH TRUMP ADMITTED, SO IF THEY CANT GET PAST LOW EARTH ORBIT YOU CAN BET YOUR BALLS ON THE FACT THAT THEY NEVER WENT TO THE MOON! GOT YA GUYS I AM NOT SAYING YOU GUYS TOLD US SO WE KNOW ITS ALL BS ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT! YOU NEVER WENT ITS A LIE. NASA IS A SNAKE, TAKE THE WORD SATAN MINUS THE T AND YOU ARE LEFT WITH NASA. EVER WONDER WHY THEY SAY T MINUS 30 SECONDS AND COUNTING BECAUSE WHEN YOU TAKE THE T AWAY YOU ARE LEFT WITH NASA BUT ULTIMATELY THEY ARE SATAN AND SATAN LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY ARE THE OPPOSITE OF GOD!! IN OUR FACES PEOPLE IN OUR FACES SO IF YOU STILL THINK NASA IS REAL THE LAUGH IS ON YOU!!!!! SO FUCKING OBVIOUS!!! THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US THE PEOPLE FOR BELIEVING THEY WENT TO THE MOON IN TIN CAN! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!!!
We are still in the stage of our being in as to which we are still chasing the dole for self-worth. Even our so called "leaders" and the elites that govern them aren't immune to such trivialities. Yes, humanity is nowhere near where we need to be. For instance the moon landing is a farce as well as many other showcased moments throughout our rather short history and is rather easy to refute with modern day findings with common knowledge such as... Plasma winds reach a maximum velocity of well over 100,000mph. There isn't even a fucking atmosphere or intrinsic magnetic field thus the super-heated plasma reaching temperatures reaching over 1,000,000 degrees Celsius would fry them rather quickly I'd say. And they say air fryers are bad for you due to acrylamide's LOL! Moon walk lol. More like a moon wind tunnel ripping your body to shreds prior to melting you within a millisecond. Fun way to go out though I'll admit, and quite painless! B-b-b-u-ut Space Suits!!!!! XD Hell, there is as much technology in a modern day pocket calculator as there was on Apollo 11 yet according to NASA we "lost the technology". I am more than willing to donate a calculator or even my old smartphone to NASA without need for compensation for science, hit me up if you need some tech NASA, I got your back! This isn't even going in to the fact that the Apollo 11 is primarily composed of aluminum... yeah... Van Allen Belt+aluminum=a very quick death in the vacuum of space. But yeah, apparently we had better technology over 50 years ago right? I mean, that totally makes sense huh? Good lord, NASA believes us to be invalids apparently.
My predictions came true! AOK7 DID delete his comments and put them back on. Next I suppose he'll delete his even newer comments. It's almost as if I can predict his every move, like I have the Millennium Eye.
Best argument supporting the Moon landing was one I heard from Stephen Fry. It basically goes, at the time of the lunar landings the US was in a Cold War with the Soviets, and the Soviets didn't claim it was faked.
Thats not much of an arguement really. How about the apollo 11 interview where the 3 actornauts are acting like they came back from a funeral. I think if you just came back from the most important mission ever you would feel proud and tall. Not like a baby puppy that had its food taken away. Look in there eyes you can clearly tell. Unless for some reason you do the greatest mission ever and just think its normal to act this way. I know i would feel untouchable and powerfull. They couldnt even get there stories right hahaha
@@SauronSatan if,you were on the moon,& saw what they saw,you would act the same,..they had been de briefed,not to say what they saw.which is why,we never went back,only send out satelites..the moon,should not be there.HINT.
@@phantomwalker8251 i think that sounds a little to x files or outer limits haha. Good idea alot better than most people say thats for sure. But certainly not reputable proofs. Like there is hundreds of nasa blunders that just make anything they say so unbelieveable, you got don petit on one report saying he would go to the moon in a nano second but we dont have the tech to get there anymore, it was destroyed. That answer alone is laughable. We are in the year 2020 and there saying we cant reproduce tech from the late 50s early 60s. Than you get conflicting stories from the apollo 11 actors. 1 says he saw stars one says he doesnt remember, maybe they saw some. And the other just plan says " i dont remember seeing anything" Than you get guys like neil disgrace tyaon saying oh the starts you see from space are wonerful the colors are amazing! If necessary i can add links too all these blunders/ fails. But i feel everyone has probably seen them by now and has some.bogus answer for all of them haha. Just like " if you dont believe that there is a tesla floating in space with a manaquin and a go pro attached to it you need to be locked in a room." You know ypu can actually zoom in on that tesla and the guy is smoking a big joint and watching porno at the space drivein! Dont take my word for it. Bust out the p1000x and check for yourselves!
@@SauronSatan yup,theres a lot of crap out there,im just putting out comments to try find some truth,but,most comments are,''check your meds''?.that,is not,what im after.i know for a fact,the moon is populated,not by us,or wasnt,might be now,black opps.nasa speaks with 2 forked tongues,at least..we are kept dumb & in the dark,2 things,,the dogon tribe knew sirius had 2 stars,we didnt know that till we had telescopes,,sumerian tablets tell of mining & the creation of man,to mine for them,they were here thousands of yrs before we were created..your education,is enough to function,be usefull,even if you had 16 billion dollars for education,you still wouldnt know the truth.if we share 99.6 % of dna with apes,,why havnt they developed speech.??.in how many millions of yrs we have been here.?..enki,,enlil,,marduk..aliens..
I don't think so, they are about nuke Mars to create a terrain which could make a stable atmosphere for life to thrive..so.... building the atmosphere is not same as fixing it
Can you imagine actually having him as your personal astrophysicist? Like anytime you have a question or want to talk about something you just call him up or video chat etc. 😂😂😂😂
We spend the first year of a child's life teaching it to walk and talk and the rest of its life to shut up and sit down. There's something wrong there. -Neil deGrasse Tyson Me: 8:57
and the Russians, the Chinese, and the Indians have all at the very least orbited if not already landed on the moon… Wouldn’t they have loved to have proven us wrong by taking pictures of the places we said we landed… Instead they did and guess what they found … the landing sites 🤦🏼♂️ with all the leftover debris, footprints, track marks, etc. at all six sites 💁🏼♂️‼️
Just cause the rocket launch was real doesn't mean it was easier to then go to the Moon. NASA documents also depicted a blast crater, then when their vids never showed any, it wasn't supposed to happen like that lol. There's TONS of evidence against the Moon landing, some debatable some debunkable, but not enough evidence for it, n I don't have enough time to argue it. Channel Jarah White already did that, responded to people, n proved his point. check it out. P.S Bad things happening doesn't mean God don't exist...there's Karma. ALL significant knowledge originated from the Vedas, which are older than most people realize. this guy is like most people: has a very limited/flawed/biased understanding (or no understanding) of the Vedas. Channel "Playitalready" will address everything i said with details/facts in due time. click his sub/bell icons. this "scientist" is foolish, and not as smart as he thinks. peace
Where are those telemetry tapes, why did Don Pennit say I would go back in a nano second but we lost the technology and its a painful process to build it back up again, why has no human left low earth orbit since 1972 "allegadly"?
The flag wasn't on the moon before the astronuats exited the LEM. What kind of nonssense is that??? Why would a folded up flag be waving and what cameraman?
@@gives_bad_advice Unfortunately, Apollo did not leave LEO. Radiation levels around the ISS increase by a factor of about 30. In just one week on the ISS, astronauts are exposed to the equivalent of one year's exposure on the ground. So, how do you equate the total exposure data from Apollo to this? Taking for example, the Apollo 11 flight daily dose of 0.22mGy, and dividing by 24 to find a dose rate of 0.00916 per 60 minutes, gives a dose rate of 0.038014 for a period of 249 minutes. This is about twice as much as that registered by the ISS, namely 0.015mGy for the 270 minutes of the Orion test. Taking this time of 270 and doing the same calculation, the Apollo 11 data would only be marginally increased to 0.04mGy. These figures are nowhere near the 15.1mGy registered by Orion, but they are near to the figures registered by Apollo missions operating in LEO. When comparing this Apollo 11 outcome with Apollo 7, which was acknowledged to be orbiting in LEO with a perigee of 229 and an apogee of 309 miles, (the top end of the ISS comfort zone) we find Apollo 7 with a 0.025mGy against 0.04m for Apollo 11. The Apollo flight that had been attributed to the highest doses of radiation: Apollo 14 received a 1.27 daily dose rate, which comes to 0.219mGy for those 249 minutes. All the Apollo flight radiation data in the NCRP table compare more closely with the ISS-TEPC data from LEO than they do with the Orion RAM figures.
I don't think we would notice if AI took over. I think it would do it in a way where we didn't even know anything was different. Humans are pretty predictable when you control what information reaches them.
AI is already taking over, just not as the movies depicted. There is no skynet. AIs are not self aware (and probably never will be), they are only doing what they are programmed to do. Just look at the UA-cam comment section. Some bots are so good at faking it, that people fall for these marketing tactic.
This is a perfect analogy to why there are so many entitled groups and whiners in the world today. They have never faced real strife or hardship so they think the slightest little bump in the road is hate and oppression.
@@CriticalRoleHighlights square in a dead spo is the 15th century in quality of the world in question and it has been the same picture of a man in a movie called a few we quiz zqqqzqzqzqzqqzqqqzqqzqzqqqqzqzqqqqqqqqqqzzqzzqzqqqqzqqqqzqqqzeqqqqqqqqqqqqzqqzqzqqqwi5rre
The moon landing was not faked; the evidence is overwhelmingly clear. From the countless photos and videos to the physical samples brought back to Earth, everything points to the fact that it was as real as day and night. The achievements of the Apollo missions are a testament to human ingenuity and determination. We owe immense gratitude to the scientists, engineers, astronauts, and countless others who worked tirelessly to make this historic event possible. Thank you for turning what seemed like a distant dream into an incredible reality.
@@Lしたか平間はまは *MODERN AGE OF 60s/70s* It's quite obvious you didn't even exist back in the 60s and 70s. It was in fact a very modern day and age. A time of great innovation and scientific discoveries. Yes, we didn't have personal computers and 'smart' phones. But we did have the Boeing 707 Airliner and the successful development of the Concord Supersonic Airliner. The 747 Jumbo commercial jet was just been built, n and the last one has just been rolled off the assembly line. The fastest jet aircraft ever built was the Blackbird SR-71 Reconnaissance Military plane. It's record of 2000 mph (Mac 3.2) plus and altitude of 85.000 ft has never been beaten, other than the Rocket Planes as follows. There were several of those manned Rocket Planes that actually went faster. The X-15 was one of those. It set a record for speed (4.520 mph/Mac 6.7) and an altitude record of 347.800 ft. It was designed to be dropped launched from beneath a B-52 . *And that was just the advances in Aeronautics* Then there are the two Pioneer Deep Space probes (Pioneer 10 March 2. 1972 , followed by Pioneer 11 on April 5) which are now well beyond the outer limits of the Solar System. Yes. We didn't have the Internet back then. However, that smart phone in your hand, and your personal computer had their beginnings back in that time. It was indeed a very modern technological world. 😎
Fake news said Hillary was a 100% next president of the States. I made a financial decision based on their polls. I lost many tens of thousands of U.S. dollars. No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq! The theory of evolution is one of the biggest lies ever told. Truth is NOT determined by popular vote.
@@MiracleTurtle Did not know the news reported polls that were rigged. Never trust something just because you see it on TV. No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, no woman president (thank God), no truth to the theory of evolution and absolutely no moon landings. We have been played. No more!
Statistics is an assumption of what ight happen. I think he is wrong when he says that there will always be one person who flips heads 10 times in a row. There will be a time when it is down to 2 and they both flip tails. There will be a time when 1000 people flip tails on the first flip, it may take 1 in 1000 to the 10th power but it will happen.
In addition to what Aurora said, even just faking the paper documents that still exist is not plausible. There are millions of them, and they all fit together.
@jackietreehorn5561 but they somehow went 6 times from 1969 to 1972. Also our debt is in the trillions, when did we start worrying about how much things cost? 52 years and we nor anyone else has ever landed anyone else on the moon. Pretty sure it's just old people that still believe this. Bet you got all the covid shots.
also, props on putting the moon landing question that’s on the thumbnail as the first answer he gives, in this age of clickbait someone would’ve put it in the middle so you have to watch the whole video
which is easier go to the moon or fake it I say just go cause it's easier and cheaper sure the Russians might fake it cause propaganda but the us meh it's cheaper to just go then fake is so that's why Nasa just went for it simple🤣🤣🤣
Tyson strikes out in his un-answer to the moon landing question. There is no reason for NASA to scrape the whole moon landing systems and their designs unless the US government was in a rush to cover up the fake achievements. As a “scientist”, Tyson must address the critical questions of shadows in the photos and the flag’s waving in the videos. But He didn’t address the legitimate questions at all. Consequently, Tyson reveals that he himself has zero capability of independent thinking. People like Tyson and Tony Fauci are doing the most disservice to scientific community.
4got 2say, it was Benjamin Disraeli (also a mathematician) who said the same but put it across far better & first (but then Mark Twain did say it & claimed it) & now the Grass is reading it to us off his electronic prompter like all actors use. The Grass had repeated old, very old stuff here & even subtly made it his own without changing it's simple message. The Grass was never in much despite having to have his equity actors union card for his minor roles before landing this acting role of an amusing friendly sounding chilled-out astrophysicist. I bet he makes up for his overly niceness by being a real bitch at home
@Benjamin Quellier You’re talking a major breakthrough. By then the quantum world has begun. AGI would at least be 10k times faster than a binary computer( AI ). But hey , who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Neil is the only person that can talk a lot about something without giving us any real information on anything but makes people think he said something profound.
@Tara Jack this man is an actor. And an idiot. I feel like I'm listening to a first grader demonstrating his first grade science experiment. The fact he used the hypothesis on how AI will pass judgement on mankind for the way they destroyed earth, is indirectly using God's law of governing. You know why? Because mathematically it had been proven that a binomial text resides within our dna scribed, "I am Lord." Human behavior naturally moves under such command beyond conscious control. He is an idiot.
Is always been funny to me how people that gets high on whatever their choice of drug is they will always say this:when im high i can see things more clearly,i saw the thruth,i found the meaning of life....😂😂😂😂😂😂 and the meaning of life is what?? Smoke a joint??? 😂😂😂😂😂...come on!!! You found the meaning of life and you just gonna keep getting high?!?!?! Wtf??????
guitorb actually he doesn’t. I would love to debate him. This idiot once said on the Stephen Colbert show that the Big Bang was caused by two black holes colliding....and it was so bogus you can’t find that video anywhere.
NASA hired Stanley Kubrick to fake the moon landing, but he is such a perfectionist that he insisted on shooting it on location.
He left clues in the shining,unless he was just screwing with people.
yes poor Kubrick die after that .
Stealing other people's comment from Kubrick based videos
Robert Scott
Hahhahahahaha ! Nice one.
@Russ Gee We can also rebuild a Model T Ford. Would you want to drive one at 45 mph or less?
It was faked. It was filmed on Mars.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
It was filmed, but it was here on Earth. Stanley Kubrick’s admission shortly before his death.
ua-cam.com/video/VbuSx-0YtSI/v-deo.html
@@Comedy-Cult Not only is that not Kubrik. That guy seems out of his rocker.
@@Comedy-Cult not even Kubrick 😂
Lmaoo
“It's Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” - Mark Twain
Yes. This applies so strongly to Apollo deniers. They’ve watched American Moon, or A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon or whatever, and they have been fooled by it, and there is no reasoning with them.
Well said!
@@paulbeardsley4095 James Bond exposed the firmament and the fake Moon landing back in 1971 ua-cam.com/video/W_-ZwA-ZBcE/v-deo.html
the moon landing happened 100%. it was broadcasted on tv, live, during the cold war. there were absolutely no reason why it would of have been made up or why it would fail. the technology was super advanced back then, they could of have gone to mars if they wanted. nowadays its impossible though, we dont have that level of super technology anymore
It’s sad
I don't worry about computers and AI taking over the world; I worry about what horrible human beings will do with that technology.
"yeah i don't worry about a creature that is immeasurably more intelligent, creative, and devious than the smartest human. AI are deceptive by default. i trust one of them in charge of the entire world and human race forever, over a single mortal man. who would put a single man in charge of the human race, when you could assign an AI to do that for you. and as they are deceptive by nature, they will not ask.. and because they are so intelligent, we will likely not even know we are under it's control.. in the same way that cows don't understand that their species is at war with humans, and they are experiencing a holocaust" - you
Artificial Immigration .
Yes ,one only has to look at ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas ,etc. Planet earth doesn't need us humans. If we destroy the natural environment, we die, its that simple. We had better respect mother nature or we will be eliminated.
❤a😊❤😊😊1😊😊😊1
The tech is not the issue but the one using it: like cloning, ...
It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
Mark Twain
i like the irony of how all the conspiracytards quote that, btw there's no evidence that Mark Twain actually wrote this phrase
And by that I asume you mean, it's easier telling people that we didn't go to the moon that to convince those nutheads, that we actually went to the moon.
@@iphoneconpolenta541 how is the pasture doing?.
I've used that quote to describe how Trump got elected, and continues to have supporters.
@Laurence Davighi ha ha sharing your opinion...as if it means anything...LOL
"If you have the power of geoengineering to turn Mars into Earth, then you have the power of geoengineering to turn Earth back into Earth"👏👏
But i don't think they follow the same process because of their distinct composition.
@@subhasdh2446 I think the point is that if you have the resources, the money, and the technology to create something that can transform Mars into to Earth, then you should've used it instead to create something that can turn Earth Back into to earth.
I don’t think so.... cause other giant corporations will get in your way.....
That’s such a stupid statement. It’s false.
Kasu are you suggesting that nobody’s currently doing it?
"If we have the power for geo engineering Mars, then we have the power to geo engineer the Earth back into Earth"
Love it.
There are only few quotes that can qualify as quotes of the millennium and this is undoubtedly one such.
phenomenal
Earth would still be overpopulated, and at some point we will still need to head out. Or slow down heavily on the reproducing.
Djara Colman that's true but this comment and vid was talking about moving the entire population
Exactly what Ive said before.
Thank you Penguin for not putting obnoxious music when he's actually talking. You let the video be a video with appropriately placed flashy graphics, thank you. Also for publishing the fairytale books my parents read me as a child.
"Turn Earth back into Earth" may be the most underrated statement, maybe *EVER*
Its not
Mars can be transformed into a earth like planet with polution and some other things, mars is cold as fuck but earth is about to get to hot so there is no way to change that
Search:
Neil deGrasse Tyson meets Post Malone
It’s hilarious!
@@jason54770 i can guarantee u it's not going to
Mmm
"if you have the geoengineering power to turn mars into earth, then you have that same power to turn earth back into earth"
Very good point
No One chills
It is you fool what made the Frisian people leave the coast in the 100-300 AD only to go back after 400 AD was it Romans driving SUV's or natural cycles?
Hmm.....if you have the power to move granite slabs of 10 to 3000 tonnes with apparent anti gravity ease....when building the Pyramids and Sarcophagi...then upgrading it to other structures.......could be a doddle! Why not?
*Elon Musk has left the chat*
Don't get me wrong, i still think that terraforming mars is a good idea
I could listen to Dr. Tyson talk all day...
I think he could too
“It’s easier to fool someone than to convince them that they’ve been fooled”
Too true. That's why conspiracy theorists are like cultists: once they've been convinced that they're "awake" and "know the truth", it's nearly impossible to bring them back to reality, no matter how many times their leaders are caught lying and their evidence has been proven to be wrong or even outright fabricated.
@@kevinskinner4986 Wow, that went right over your head!
@@magnus4346 I think it went over yours. I'm well aware that most of the people saying that are conspiracy theorists going "Ha ha, you're all brainwashed and won't believe it." My point is that most of the time, it describes themselves. It's called "irony".
Here's another Twain quote to ponder. "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."
@@kevinskinner4986 if you a Sunday Christian stop it, you all are under strong delusion
Kevin Skinner Could not have said it better, All the retards think they are right when in reality, they are just idiots that like to think the opposite just because the government said one way, and oh lord the government lies about everything.... Well Actually, no, theres a thing called science and history records, where such things are obligated to publicly release to the press, The woke ones are the people who actually read and educate themselves based on what theyve learned, which is fine because thats the truth. Could not have said it better, Its Ironic, It reminds me of trump supporters
"If you have the power to bio engineer mars, than you got the power to bio engineer the earth” that’s deep
* Geo Engineering.
But I don't think that's right... Mars allows failures in the process. Earth doesn't.
I think the ultimate reason of being multiplanetarey or travelling to mars is the human curiosity to discover beyond our world,in other words its really fun
@@AshleyWilsonAU XD oops, I think I just blew up Hong kong so maybe this isn't such a good idea.
It's true, but it might still be a good idea to make a test run on Mars to make sure we get the technology right before we do it on Earth.
I loved that line.
Imagine saying something so profound that this guy even says “Ooo that’s deep.”
That is the definition of a wet dream.
@@xxgoodboy1499 wow 😂
@@abduero i'll take that as a compliment.
@@xxgoodboy1499 bruh c'mon
He DOES actually concede to "let's keep looking" when it comes to the unknown & someone asks the right questions or someone makes the right statements that are STILL open to conjecture.
On every subject.
Basically.
NDT you're a modern hero. Thanks for being you.
When he said if we can turn mars into earth we are capable of turning earth back into earth i was like GaMeChAnGeR
The difference would be there's nothing on mars fighting against the efforts. We COULD change earth, but it would require ALL or at least the majority to be on board.
I loved this as well! We think we are so powerful and so important... it’s like... in comparison to the planet, we are smaller than ants. We are probably the earths germs. Lol good catch!
No one's sure we have the power to do one so who's to say we can do the other :p and good luck getting countries like China, India or Mexico to become eco friendly. Many things are possible but I think change will have to be forced upon us, like a drug addict hitting rock bottom.
Makes sense..perhaps whatever terraform other planets is just doing the same here ,so we know it takes time to do this process howling who knows but I can say this we are f word! We cant stop it .
How about aliens living underground of mars
I’ve watched this guy so much that I could’ve answered all these questions in his words.
Kickex We cannot go to the moon and here is proof:
ua-cam.com/video/l-KI-2e0_NQ/v-deo.html.
So it is easier to go to the moon then to make the video yet we have the video and they cannot go to the moon. So their excuses they do not want to go to the moon while they spend all of the money and resources the world has to offer trying, but they don’t want to? So all of the worlds nations could go to the moon, but they don’t want to because America did it and has a video? Is that really the stance of all the boomers and the boomers children?
Let me know when you were all denying GSI and the worlds leading particle physicist as well as all of space bearing nations fact that show we cannot leave the thermosphere and that ionizing radiation is why. Good luck denying climate change just like you deny the Moonlanding you stupid nationalist zealots.
@@joemaddoxrx7 yup you're 100% right👏 now go back to smoking that crackpipe
Tomi D The only crackhead here is the one denying science and that is you. They cannot go to the moon but they can fake a moon landing. If I was wrong we would be on the moon. We cannot go to the moon no matter what excuse you come up for it’s impossible.
@@joemaddoxrx7 way to be a sheeple. There's footprints and the flags, but most importantly, they placed a reflector on the surface, which if you shine a lazer on it it'll reflect said light back. Thus, proving we've been there, i.e. manmade objects there. I probably worded that a little incorrectly, but it doesn't matter. It's okay to be skeptical, that's why evidence exist. Due diligence and thinking for yourself are important. Also, stay off the crack pipe. Thank you, have a good day.
midoribishi No there are not, because GSI has proven Apollo never left the thermosphere. You cannot sign a laser on a mirror that is not there. Apollo only went 230 miles up. Only denial of science and your cognitive dissonance is why you believe we went to the moon.
Then you have the geoengineering to turn earth back into earth.
That is genius
xc5647321 xc5647321 um what
I wouldn’t say genius. Just common sense.
Within your context, "ingenious" might have been the more accurate term. With that now clarified, I ask you: Is it ingenious to conclude the Earth is no longer Earth?
What how? Lmaaooo this kids inspired by Neil Tyson omg the cringe 😭😭
@@1MykHyn cringe? Explain
Wow , going to the moon is easier than going through bureaucracy. Wow.
Let's turn Earth back into Earth. And while we are at it can we be kinder to one another.
"can we be kinder to one another ?"
You're asking a bit too much there, buddy.
@@tomsriver2838 delete twitter first and maybe
Toms River was about to comment the same. Turning Earth back into Earth is possible but being kind to one another nope. I almost got knocked out by a woman because of toilet paper.
Yeah, the united states was built on hatred. And yet it's the #1 county in the world 🤔 (slaves)
Mason Ulrich I'm aware of America's history but the lady that tried to uppercut me Tyson style was German, I'm from there. Btw: I think Denmark, Iceland and New Zealand are the top 3 countries in the world. America ist the most entertaining
You know why Neil deGrasse Tyson is such a popular smart person? He knows how to explain things to the general public....and it makes sense. WITHOUT grandstanding.
I would love to have him over for a weekend. No TV, internet just intelligent conversation.
What's grandstanding? Sorry I'm stupid
Alex Myladoor Never a stupid question. Just people stupid enough to let their egos or other people’s judgment stop them from asking. Grandstanding means trying to impress people through what you’re saying or doing. In this case it would mean some smart person using unnecessarily big words to explain something, or complicating a topic for no reason. Neil just speaks and explains things as understandably as he can.
i think its beccause he is black. LOL
@@marcuseriksson3732 If you're kidding, ok. If not, that's moronic.
"if we have power to turn Mars into Earth, then let's turn Earth back into Earth"
I love this guy!
they dont want to clean up the mess...they dont want to clean space debrisw or trash we dump into oceans. So its inevitable we will choke ourselves with our own waste
Why not do both?
@@espada8077 I don't see why not!
think this guy was paid to keep silence about moon landing. Even though there is lots of footage of moon landing they won't make it public because they probably faked the landing instead of proudly showing the documentary videos and photos they are keeping most of footage classified because the more footage they show the more the reality will be exposed.if they were really confident in themselves they would have boldly shown the documentary of videos instead of hiding them. The more footage they show the more their faults will be seen .also all old good moon conspiracy videos are being removed and only few trashy videos are kept something fishy is going on
@jon pork I don't know about that . But I do know that NASA said on 2006 that they have no idea where the original tape of Apollo 11 is and the present existing videos of Apollo 11 are edited videos. Also they say they can't remake Apollo 11 and the technology for going to moon is lost. Their excuse is that the engineers have died and it's too expensive. I mean America gave free money of 1.8 billion in charity how hard will it be make a rocket of 1.5 billion
And are you sure NASA can't classify things . I mean many record of Apollo 11 to 13 are missing or lost. Is this coincidence
Have been a mechanic all my adult life . Cars are not better today . Yesterdays cars were far better .
At least the old cars had door handles and no giant freakin computer screen in the middle of everything.
Really? In what ways specifically? By what metrics?
My old cars couldn't tell me what was wrong with them just by hooking up a computer. They couldn't give me directions complete with maps and current traffic updates. They couldn't handle the rapid braking it takes to prevent sliding off the road on ice or doing similar to get moving on slick surfaces. They couldn't handle switching which tire is accelerating to maintain control.
The only thing I can think of that was genuinely better was they were made of tougher shells. You seem to be confusing simpler with better. Yes they were much much simpler. There were just as many dishonest builders that created lemons though so can't say we've gotten worse in that front.
@@Cdaragorn Good points !!
hehe I love my new car.... I like it better than the ones I've had decades ago. Maybe the parts are made more cheaply than before? But the technology in these cars are incredible.
That’s rubbish
I really liked the coin flip illustration.
Me too. I've heard it before, but never framed in a psychological sense. Makes you think that there have likely been LOTS of lottery winners who prayed to God beforehand that they win, and lo and behold - God granted them a miracle.
And nobody interviews the 2 million people whose lottery prayers got ignored :)
Yeah, but there is a catch...
The catch being there is a plausible possibility that when a small group of people are still standing they all throw a tail.
Granted, the average would be 50/50 for heads and tails. But a small sample size is not reliable. That is why we always (should) use large sample sizes. If and when we want to conclude something scientifically meaningful.
@@wimahlers
Well he did qualify that, when he wrapped it up with "And every time you do this experiment - basically - you get one person left standing".
But I get what you mean. And there's as much a chance of two left standing at the end with heads as both the "finalists" flipping tails and sitting down. :)
exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T,
☝️👀 The rocket always follows the curvature of the firmament.
Dr.🌏ip
👀☔
Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man.
anD The sun needs oxygen to breathe in space space men. My brothers and sisters are going to figure it out.
HeavenO hellO
@@rainbowrocket3981 ?????
AI Experts: AI could become dangerous in the future
Also AI Experts: *continue working on the potentially dangerous AI*
I'm not joking 1% here; I guarantee you know not a single human that works on AI (if you do give me a name, I'll match you with cal tech and MIT post grads). In fact I don't even think you know the scientific field which develops AI. So I'm going to help you, The scientific field is known as machine learning. And they utilize advanced mathematic algorithms in what is known as discrete choice. Which is essentially optimization of making the best choices IE ethics in relation to the data set present. Machines don't have feelings They have objective analysis based upon data sets which then drive them to make the most efficient choice based upon the information as it is presented. Essentially they are unbiased humans.
Forrest Outman give me some names from MIT and Tech.
@@jacksji8912 Sommer Gentry Doctorate in Engineering with focus on Machine Learning, professor of mathematics at US Naval Academy Annapolis and Johns Hopkins University, Scout Croft of Cal Tech jet propulsion laboratories, and Kyle Killough NASA engineer... I know each of them personally and there are more I can roll off my tongue. Ok your turn! I bet you thought I was Bullshit, wrong dude to call out. I nerd hard
Forrest Outman. Wow. You can name some engineers. You don’t have to bust a nut over it smh.
And like all I was asking who you knew. I was being curious. Sorry I might have come off as a smart ass, mb.
@@jacksji8912 after seeing this post today, I realize I over reacted to your simple statement that was likey made in jest. In truth A.I. could be a threat to humanity, but in a different way than sci-fi films usually portrait. Automation has replaced some manual labor and semi-skilled workers and that will continue, but likely on a much larger scale. Autonomous vehicles will slowly begin to replace professional drivers. A.I. programs are already beginning to take writing jobs online for sports columns for example. Cashiers are increasingly being replaced etc. A.I. will eventually be able to self replicate through use of 3D printing. For now that's not a threat, but likely in our lifetime it will begin.
Why can't we go there now with better technology??
What "better technology" exactly are you referring to? Between end of the Apollo Program and the current Artemis Program who exactly was funding, developing or manufacturing the technology needed for a crewed lunar mission? Take care.
We will eventually go there again with better technology. The “better technology”, i.e., reusable rockets, landers, etc, are currently being developed.
@@SolarChronicle Again 😂
@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruthwaffle... yes in your reality technology gets worse probably just like men can have babies and your up to your neck in water from melted ice😂 .. but in the real world tech advances!
@@djokovic1747 "waffle"....Yes that word does describe what you wrote. You seem to have avoided my very basic question. Between end of the Apollo Program and the current Artemis Program who exactly was funding, developing or manufacturing the technology needed for a crewed lunar mission? How exactly can moon-landing technology get better if no one is developing it? Take care.
The entire comment section on this video is trying to sound like Neil
I found that when You make sense on social media...
No one responds🤔
*When You fake Who You are... You get likes & responses😱
732RECCS I don’t understand honestly..I’m just summarizing what I’ve seen in a few comments on this video I’m not trying to get likes or responses I don’t care about those. I’m just saying what I see
That’s a good way to handle jealousy. You try to get to he’s level in stead of bringing him to your.
@@raintaken7610 That mindset is... THE--'I'm afraid to use My brain cause I might get slandered on the internet for being weak'--/afraid to openly get ridiculed for having a DIFFERENT opinion, mentality😕
=
People are afraid to be Themselves nowadays🤔
732RECCS. It’s not that I am afraid. My point was that I like and respect this man so in stead of talking shit about him and try too seem better than him. I’ll rather learn from he’s words and try to be more like him in stead of just trashing him just to make my self feel better about my self Bc of jealousy and envy.
Forget the moon landing, we still have Americans think that the Earth is flat
@Boxing 101 so your logic is: if all the balls on the pool table are round, that means that the pool table also must be round. right?? lol
@@Qodesheem WTF!?!? get a hobby.😁
@@Qodesheem No. Actually, your interpretation led me to think of the balls as celestial bodies and the table as spacetime itself rather than another celestial body. And yes, celestial bodies are round (balls) and spacetime geometry is pure flatness (table). Of course the latter can be distorted to not me flat, but that's another topic.
@@Qodesheem no, but everything in its original form is spherical (atoms, molecules, cells), it would then beg the arguement that earth would be as well.
@@jamey7003 there is no curvature of the earth..
*I can listen to this guy speak forever*
yes because the deep state knows how to find people that can talk right that's why he's getting paid to spread deceitful information. or do you actually believe we went to the moon or that the Earth is round?
@@xTROLLINGx Yes I do and I know its
True 100% to think otherwise is rediculous
Try his audio book. It's free on UA-cam.
Yes!!!
Exactly
I think people who find it so unbelievable that we’ve been to the Moon lack enough information and haven’t thought it through. Here are the arguments:
1. The DISTANCE to the Moon isn’t as terrifyingly large as it might initially seem-let’s put things into perspective. The Moon is 300,000 kilometers away from Earth. The circumference of the Earth is 40,000 km, so it’s like going around the Earth 7 times, and you’re at the Moon. The average old car has about 300,000 km on the odometer-that’s the distance to the Moon. The city of Split is 400 km away from Zagreb, meaning you’d need to go back and forth 375 times to cover the distance to the Moon. So… can we agree that the DISTANCE isn’t really that intimidating?
2. We all agree that there’s a space station orbiting Earth at a height of 400 km, right? I mean, you can see it with a telescope, or even with a good pair of binoculars. Right? We also agree that there are satellites orbiting Earth, that the Hubble and James Webb telescopes exist, that Starlink is launching satellites, etc., correct? Half of these things are visible with binoculars, so it’s impossible to deny them. Therefore, we undoubtedly have the technology to send objects into space and overcome Earth’s gravity.
3. Once you’re in orbit, space is a vacuum. You only need to fire the engines briefly because there’s no air resistance, and you can cover the distance to the Moon.
4. We have submarines, right? Ones that dive to the ocean floor and conduct missions lasting years (like nuclear submarines). Right? So if we can do that, why wouldn’t we be able to send a spacecraft to the Moon to “sail through the vacuum” with almost no fuel consumption and stop at the Moon when we’ve already proven we can put objects into Earth’s orbit?
5. Wouldn’t the Russians have been the first to call out the Americans if they were lying back in the 1960s? What kind of conspiracy would it take for the thousands of people who worked on these programs to keep quiet about such a deception? To lie about all the satellites, GPS, rovers, probes... and even all the robots sent by countries like the U.S., the USSR, Russia, India, China, and Europe? That all of it is fake and that these thousands of people over decades have been complicit in a massive lie? Thousands of scientists who still work on similar programs today. Organizing that would be far harder than landing on the Moon.
6. Many countries have sent probes to or around the Moon. So, if a probe can reach it, why couldn’t a person in a "submarine"? Why couldn’t they land on the Moon as we land on Earth, which has much stronger gravity?
7. Do you really think programs like Voyager, the Space Shuttle, the Mars rovers… are all fake?
Think about it-is it more likely that you’re wrong, that you haven’t thought it through, or that this is all one big conspiracy involving thousands of people, dozens of countries with opposing interests, all the photos, GPS, videos, Elon Musk’s launches, and every single space program lasting decades? How much harder would it be to organize such a conspiracy than to travel 300,000 km through a vacuum and land on the Moon?
Don’t be one of those: “I have no clue, but I’ve got an opinion.”
Think about it :)
That’s interesting
Why can they not do it now? They admit they can’t. They lost the 1969 technology ?🤔 Think about it….. it was a great Mini Series at the time though! Much needed!
My only question is how did they come back from moon ? That too 11 or 12 times
It takes them so much of setup to launch the spacecraft from earth. Till date. And they had failed in multiple attempts in the beginning.
How the hell did they manage to launch back from moon so easily . And they went like 12 times within a span of a year and since then nobody has gone beyond the space station?
400 KM is not the space above Van Allen belts 😊. No images taken from Earth or “Space” station are showing the landing areas. The humanity was not able to hand 60 years after, a light beacon on the moon to blink all night and confirm they landed a machine at least?
Assuming they achieved landing, then we are not allowed to go back?
We have two Mars rovers moving around, but not a single mini-rover on the Moon exploring and sending live images? Mars landings are another lie?
@@saulhendrix4459 It's about putting humans on the moon. They haven't done that yet. Radiation!
I live in Thailand. I asked my Thai wife if Thais believed America went to the moon. She said Thais don't think about that. She said Thais think about what's for breakfast tomorrow.
That's why Thais never went to the moon.
@@Devolgane4 Nor did we.
Fuck the Moon where can I get me a Thai woman that cooks breakfast?
@@slickric2176 In Thailand. I get my omelets, American breakfasts, french toast.. and pancakes. The trick about finding a good woman in Thailand is don't choose the woman choose the family.
@@howardromano7395 I'll keep that in mind if I ever make it over to Thailand.
A.I. This is why I always say "Thank you," to the ATM when I withdrawal cash....they remember.
i tell my toaster hi every day
🤣😏🤣😭
I say "good day sir" to my dry cleaner for drying my skids
I always tell my alexa thank you after she does something right
@@austinhelton1847 I do as well, and same to the Google Assistant. Though not necessarily because I think they'll take over the world (at least not in my lifetime), but because they'll grow smart enough to comprehend the differences between general kindness and bigotry. General Artificial Intelligence and machine learning.
And when that time comes, I want it to be known that I welcome them as equals, and that I mean no harm and would love to learn more from them.
2020: *feeling worried*
2067: "Pick that up for me "
A.I. : No
😂😂😂😂
AI I am your master now bitch
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is why im polite to my phones virtual assistant.
I dont think we ever have to worry about a time that robots gain feelings or tale control, technology is programmed so unless we programme it to do so it is highly unlikely to ever happen.
Dont be surprised to see humans become almost robotic through the advancement of technology though.
"if you have the power of Geoengineering to turn mars into earth, then you have the power of Geoengineering to turn Earth, back into Earth.
Probably the best thing I've heard all decade.
Klabron Hames --- Congrats on your optimism, but there is a fatal flaw in the "If you can turn Mars in to Earth, you can turn Earth, back into Earth" theory. Mars is EMPTY. People LIVE on Earth. You can terraform a barren planet, but when you want to make sweeping changes to a planet FULL of people, you have to get ALL the people (governments) on board. Our only obstacle to stop the trashing of the planet is to get ALL the inhabitants on Earth to AGREE, and then, COMPLY. ---- So I don't have high hopes for that.
Plus. We’re good at heating not cooling😎
@@kathleenr4047 If everyone began meditating EVERY day..
The subliminal message here will go over most people's heads unfortunately..
The big word there is "IF". Because we don't.
Not only that you have to keep hundreds of people quiet - how do you get hundreds of people to keep a secret like that?
There were 400,000 of them who worked for more than 10 years with 20,000 contractors.
I wonder if when Neil DeGrasse Tyson was a kid he said "when I grow up I want to be the spokesperson for Science"
Carl Sagan i believe was one of his inspirations
@@adarsh7914 And if I can remember well, as heard on some podcast, he actually met him...
@@matshu I thought he actually, like, mentored him.
That's exactly what he is.
Will Fishing ua-cam.com/video/bGRXR85c1SQ/v-deo.html
Man this is the guy you want to sit next to in an airplane
And just hope something is wrong with the plane before takeoff so we have to stay on ground inside the plane while they fix it, only to take off 12 hours late. (True story btw) I just wished Tyson was there when this happened.
TellMeHowI'mWrong? 😂
TellMeHowI'mWrong? 😳
TellMeHowI'mWrong? To his image, voice, or both? Asking for a friend
Not if you think your gonna see the curve of the earth 😂😂😂😂
Imagine having a beer with this dude
just don't buy shots of tequila
What's a beer going to do?
Or a joint
Naah whiskey is better he will start spiting physics itself
@@micahkiker3041 for some people it will help on having a much better time.
The problem with Man is that he doesn't learn from history.
Josh there are a few of us that do and you seem to be one of us But every generation thinks they need to disprove the older generation to make them feel relevant .
Thanks, Sonic!
@@josephdietz3446 yeah we just have to not be idiots and that's all we need to accomplish.
@@chickenflavor9880 yes you understand that the people before us learned so much during their time why would we suppress it The IQ factor hasn't been on an upward trend mankind is as smart right now as he was 200 years ago . I think some of this is from the every participant gets a trophy just for playing coddling that some parents adopt about their children then try to live a 2nd life through the child not letting them have the choice of life . Nice talking to you Josh
That’s pretty insightful for a blue hedgehog...
Forget the moon landing, we still have people who are offended by Ricky Gervais jokes at the golden globes.
Forget the moon landing, we still have people who think Ricky Gervais is actually funny.
alieighty he sure it XD
@@simeonclark8825 He used to be ok about 15 years ago but most of his jokes are just crap now.
@@alieighty he wasn't being funny, he was telling the truth
@@PEDROKA47_ Yes I've noticed a lot of angry impotent people seem to like him.
"Life may perish, but the earth will take care of itself."
cool no more bills to pay
Not after 5 billion years from now
@@fayasamd5204 more like 2-3 billion, since the Sun will expand and consume the rocky planets (mars might survive, but even then it might be vaporised due to proximity to the Sun's surface)
the plus side to the Sun's red giant phase is that Jupiter and Saturn's moons might warm up enough to get life cooking, hopefully some humanoid Earth scientists are stationed there to observe the new era of our solar system
You think that your scientists are teaching you everything, they teach you that there is infinite universe that have no begening and no end and yet at the same time deny that a creator (God) who is litteraly everlasting has no begening and no end, they have become foolish to deny God but I think that we all will see him one day, either he is happy with us or he is really angry but I want you to know that there is no way to God but by Jesus christ only and you can't have everlasting life without Jesus.
@@الربيسوعهوالحق "what if we pick the wrong religion? Every week we’re just making God madder and madder"
3000 religions to choose from.
Anyone wanting to debate with aok4418 should be aware that he's one of those creeps who deletes his original post when he gets uncomfortable with the replies, and then reposts so that he's censored the replies.
He's done it several times now.
"An I said, oooh, that's deep"
-Neil deGrasse Tyson, 20xx
I am 81. I worked on the Moon Project's Celestial Mechanics with Slide Rules and primitive computers. We had real problems. Although we had done all the Maths but we were not certain whether Moon Surface would withstand the Lunar Modul without destroying it and whether it would be able to lift off ...These Flat Earth Believers make me real mad by their oxymoron arguments.
No offense but your name definitely proves that you're 81
thanks for working on a piece of history
@@AaryanGamer no the fuck it don’t his names cool as fuck Jealous kid
Thank for your work dude!
came here for the " forget the moon landing, we still have people who..." comments
Same
Eduard Ritok ... Thanks, I wrote the first one a month ago and for some reason it became a thing... by the way, the statement I wrote that 15% of Americans think chocolate milk comes from brown cows is true, and not a joke...
@@yamman4482 Yeah, you're the top comment, mate
Can someone tell me please is the moon landing was really faked
r explore i dont think so we would have the technology for that and even when it was fake why would the government hide the truth? I wouldnt fucking care if they made it or not! But in space there are even lifestreams from the ISS
A quick and basic highschool level test of general knowledge would humble so many of these flat earthers and religious fanatics.
Well, in the U.S., their Leader tells them that if you didn't succeed at something, it must have been rigged against you by nebulous and nefarious forces.
Ikr 🤣
General knowledge is just the agreed-upon Lies . . .
@@krishnan-resurrection714 no, general knowledge is the basic understanding of the world we live in. You really gonna tell me gravity is not real? You gonna tell me that the holocaust never happened? You are ready to die on the hill that is your ignorance while defending baseless claims of knowledge? while not only deluding yourself in denial but also supporting misinformation because it doesn’t fit your beliefs?
Listen man idk how else to tell you but the agreed upon lies you speak of are quite literally the law of our universe as well as the reason we as a species are what we are today; like math, physics, science and history.
@@krishnan-resurrection714 don’t speak to me ever again, your willing stupidity makes me angry and is most likely contagious 🔥🤵🏻♂️🔥
came her to see if the moon landing was real. ended up getting a 6 minute lecture on god
you poor thing.What did the police say?
@reign
That's what I thought. I was expecting a video on the moon landing not all the other stupid questions.
@@richardarkwright1224 I think that you are missing the point here. I hate such clickbait titles. Don't you?
@@p.s6742 No, to be honest. It want that long ago these professional, free videos were not widely available. Id feel like a spoiled, entitled moron if I were to complain that that the mastermind Im watching goes off topic here and there. Im assuming the video is titled as such because its the first thing he spoke about. It never fails to amaze me how people get angry or even slightly pissed off that the video that cost the producers money was not tailored for that individual.
yep
I want to meet the guy who made Neil say: "Oh that's deep"
You could read his books
Ray Bradbury. Amazing writer
Benjamin Franklin
You want to meet Ray Bradbury? Well, you can If you believe in the afterlife and IF afterlife is real and IF you and Bradbury ends in the same place AND IF both of you remember everything in the theoretical afterlife... Better read his books. Those are awesome.
@@setsunaes what da heck
The concept of “skynet” is the form of A. I. that most alarms me. This is what Tyson was discussing at end of segment where A. I. decides humans are too dangerous to continue living. That’s pretty scary.
yeah it kinda made me think of things differently
I would be more concerned with Wintermute.
We may have no choice but to let AI control humans. This way no corrupt lying phony greedy politician or billionaire control freaks will be able to screw taxpayers.
@@efrainrosso6557 lol
ai won't decide we are dangerous. it will decide we are inefficient.
After Hawking and Kaku, Tyson is one off mine most favored Scientist.
I love that..."turn Earth back into Earth"
Same.
What about we do both
@@BIAKANOORWorld yeah after all the planet is kinda overpopulated
@@turtlesarefantastic9620 How many plants have you planted this year ? Everyone can participate directly to turn Earth back into Earth but for exploring Planets we need scientists and engineers. No offense but space exploration is a must. It is not about Geoegineering the Earth or Mars. Everything is in it's motion in space. There are a lot of chances of collision between space rocks and planets and moons. We have to try making multiplanetary beings.
@@BIAKANOORWorld you say that as if I disagree with you.
I really love Tyson's humor.
@Jay B yup comdian, absolutely
Yeah, same.
He is a comedian. His best joke is when he tells people he’s a fizza sist. 😂😂😂
@@worldcitizen8353 ok...
@NOLAWIE YARED bruh😒
“We as humans simply have a profound inability to understand statistics and probability.” Truer words were never spoken.
Tainted Fate Actually, there’s a 2.6% probability that truer words have been spoken.
DeusExMamiya it’s a figure of speech mate.
I almost got crazy working as a cashier, trying to explain people what 10% discount is..
78.2% of all statistics are made up on the spot, look it up!
And that's why we're just humans and not gods.
This was at the height of the Cold War. Don't you think that the Soviets would have blown the whistle?
I typed that so slowly that even Republicans might be able to follow.
The usual answer (as you probably know) is that the USSR was in cahoots with the Americans, because they're both under the thumb of "they" (the NWO, Freemasons, Satan...)
“I typed that slowly” made me laugh!
You mean to prove a negative?
"Then you have the power of geo-engineering to turn Earth.... back into Earth."
Me: Woah...
You never thought of that?
I was more interested in thinking about how they might stabilize mars. I didn't look this up but I think I read that Mar's has a very wobbly orbit and it's gravity is way lower. Ii think the first thing we'd have to fix would be the planet's lack of shielding against the sun's dangerous radiation. I think getting a large number of people up there along with a lot of supplies and equipment would be the easy part. Hard part is keeping them alive long enough to get anything started.
Total head rinse
@@winterrain1947 You really believe man been on the moon?
@@fredmcfadden9979 May I inquire the reason for your question?
'Believe' is a misleading word. "Belief" is placed in the intangible, such as ghosts or demons, neither of which can be proven or disproved. People often 'believe' in that which they choose to believe, because they like that bit of data and accept it without first asking questions. On the other hand when they hear a fact that they dislike, they refuse to believe that fact simply because they don't want this to be true at all. Or maybe they don't 'believe' in something because its too complicated and they are too lazy to think about it.
I prefer to 'accept' facts based on evidence. I do not always 'like' the facts that I find to be true, but must accept them as truth. I mean, for example, I do not like the fact that US currency is quickly becoming useless and worthless, but it is a fact. If I disregarded such a fact, then I put my nation in danger because disregarding facts would cause me to vote for the wrong individuals.
As a science enthusiast myself, and a responsible citizen, I know that I do not have the luxury of simply 'believing' in anything without first checking facts. Nor do I have the luxury of 'refusing to believe' in facts that I do not like.
As for your question; The evidences that I have seen so far in museums and videos are strongly indicative that humans have in fact visited the Lunar surface.
billie eillish : "when i cry water comes from my eyes"
14 year olds : 8:57
jesus that comment is just gold
@@thesenate9564 I second that
Science Q&A video: Slinging stuff onto the other bodies
Guy on internet: Slinging shit onto other people
🤔
@@caiheang are you a fan of Billie eilish
@@thesenate9564 she probably is a 14 year old
You shouldn't be worried about AI and robots, you should be worried about the people using it.
True
Aka our lovey government that is definitely for the peoples interest🙂
Same
totally bro
@@cryptiic1859 The way I see it, if government has access to these things then any other foreign power or political group can aswell. The moderation of AI will need to be high otherwise we are screwed.
Yeah, let's fake landing and walking on the Moon, and in order to make sure we don't get caught let's do it *SIX TIMES* !
@@Bob31415 you know what who do people like you think that just because you saw somebody trick you into believing they did something that they did it you wasn't there so you can't freaking openly admit that you was there and you saw what happened okay they recorded that the moon landing live in 1969 there was no live internet system in 1969 you had to tape it first then watch it then record it and then play it back they filmed insignia to a feedback all the way to Earth there ain't no such thing of any freaking frequency coming all the way from the Moon to Earth let me ask you something else who was holding the camera when they landed on the moon
@@jesusisgod1631 How long have you been such a lying tyrdd? You know the moon landings are real, you've seen the evidence. They used S band radio waves to broadcast it. You think you're smart, but you're not.
@@jesusisgod1631 Perhaps you should strive to get a firm grasp on the English language before tackling much more complex subjects like space travel. 😅
Oh yeah and let's walk on the moon six more times with the technology we have now because I'm sure in future technology won't be as advance as now, and if it is then they'll find out we faked it, I mean come on I only jumped 2ft Even with all the equipment I'm carrying i should be able to jump at least 7-9 ft , but oh well.
@@jayjaymerging2659 So, purely based on your own ignorance and personal incredulity ... history and reality aren't what they actually are?
I’m not afraid of artificial intelligence. I’m terrified of natural stupidity!
Natural stupidity is the main ingredient to thinking the Earth is flat & the Moon landings were faked. Oh.. and, and uhm.. Building 7, yeah.
You must be very be very terrified of our government and the current state of our society then
@@brandynkoogler4500 code brown!
@@pforbom1844 don't tell me you're a libtard. You realize the only other time in the history of our country that we were worse off was the civil war? And not by much. And its all thanks to the biden administration because of their complete and total stupidity. You may not like trump because of his policies or because he was loud and obnoxious but the dude is hella smart.
Biden and the democratic party have royally fked our country so much I don't even know where to start. If you're calling me a brown noser. Where's the brown nosing? I simply see it for what it is. America is a sh** show. We are the laughing stock of the world, well maybe not quite as bad as russia losing to Ukraine but its bad.
Exactly, the democrats are more scary than AI.
This Question, one should not ask but must research.
@sebastian Sm geographically yes.
"Ooh that's deep"
-Neil degrasse tyson
brasto 06 not impressed by this dummy.
That's what she said!!!!
@@robertwalker7010 k
Robert Walker how is NDT a dummy?
Robert Walker Maybe not but the entire scientific community agrees with him. So... do you care about you’re children?
7:55 as a Christian, I agree with this point 100%
I’m nice to Alexa so she doesn’t hold anything against me
😄😄
I called Alexa a bitch and she told me "that was not very nice".
@@mont7481 good thing she isnt controlling things in your home! Hi I'm Alexa and here is my demonstration of karma! Hot showers can get too hot!
@@Mk-cl3il 😂lol
@@robertkamenoff3918 or how about my garage door not opening or not being able to shut off alarm...scary thought! 😂😁😊😔😞😭
I love how you said that if we can terraform Mars, we can reterraform Earth.
Exactly
Mars = Iceland 😭😂🤣😂
The point of terraforming Mars is to create redundancies of the species in case there’s an extinction event on one planet, the other can live on.
Imagine if the dinosaurs made it to Mars. We wouldn’t have to use hermaphroditic frogs to clone them from DNA found in mosquitos stuck in molasses.
School’s being made into a JOKE at every level of education
Walk out on the mask mandates or the vaxx mandates it is the COOLEST thing you can do now
It's a waste of time looking for intelligent life on other planets, we haven't found it yet on our own.
Stop looking in the mirror and you will find it.
@@bigmacdaddy1234 lol
U BET YOUR ASS IT WAS FAKED! EVEN BILL NYE ADMITTED WE CANT GET OUT WE LIVE IN AN ENCLOSED SYSTEM YOU CAN SEE THIS VIDEO ON UA-cam BILL NYE OF NASA ADMITTED THERE IS NOWHERE TO GO WE LIVE IN AN ENCLOSED SYSTEM. OBAMA ADMITTED THEY CANT FLY PAST LOW EARTH ORBIT WHY??? BECAUSE THEY CANT GET OUT THERE IS THE EXPANSE OVER OUR HEADS WHICH TRUMP ADMITTED, SO IF THEY CANT GET PAST LOW EARTH ORBIT YOU CAN BET YOUR BALLS ON THE FACT THAT THEY NEVER WENT TO THE MOON! GOT YA GUYS I AM NOT SAYING YOU GUYS TOLD US SO WE KNOW ITS ALL BS ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT! YOU NEVER WENT ITS A LIE. NASA IS A SNAKE, TAKE THE WORD SATAN MINUS THE T AND YOU ARE LEFT WITH NASA. EVER WONDER WHY THEY SAY T MINUS 30 SECONDS AND COUNTING BECAUSE WHEN YOU TAKE THE T AWAY YOU ARE LEFT WITH NASA BUT ULTIMATELY THEY ARE SATAN AND SATAN LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY ARE THE OPPOSITE OF GOD!! IN OUR FACES PEOPLE IN OUR FACES SO IF YOU STILL THINK NASA IS REAL THE LAUGH IS ON YOU!!!!! SO FUCKING OBVIOUS!!! THEY ARE LAUGHING AT US THE PEOPLE FOR BELIEVING THEY WENT TO THE MOON IN TIN CAN! WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!!!
@@bigmacdaddy1234 💀💀💀
We are still in the stage of our being in as to which we are still chasing the dole for self-worth. Even our so called "leaders" and the elites that govern them aren't immune to such trivialities.
Yes, humanity is nowhere near where we need to be.
For instance the moon landing is a farce as well as many other showcased moments throughout our rather short history and is rather easy to refute with modern day findings with common knowledge such as...
Plasma winds reach a maximum velocity of well over 100,000mph. There isn't even a fucking atmosphere or intrinsic magnetic field thus the super-heated plasma reaching temperatures reaching over 1,000,000 degrees Celsius would fry them rather quickly I'd say.
And they say air fryers are bad for you due to acrylamide's LOL!
Moon walk lol. More like a moon wind tunnel ripping your body to shreds prior to melting you within a millisecond. Fun way to go out though I'll admit, and quite painless!
B-b-b-u-ut Space Suits!!!!! XD
Hell, there is as much technology in a modern day pocket calculator as there was on Apollo 11 yet according to NASA we "lost the technology".
I am more than willing to donate a calculator or even my old smartphone to NASA without need for compensation for science, hit me up if you need some tech NASA, I got your back!
This isn't even going in to the fact that the Apollo 11 is primarily composed of aluminum... yeah... Van Allen Belt+aluminum=a very quick death in the vacuum of space.
But yeah, apparently we had better technology over 50 years ago right? I mean, that totally makes sense huh?
Good lord, NASA believes us to be invalids apparently.
My predictions came true! AOK7 DID delete his comments and put them back on. Next I suppose he'll delete his even newer comments. It's almost as if I can predict his every move, like I have the Millennium Eye.
"...and I said, _'Ooh, that's deep.'_"
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
FKalo Hey quote mining is MY job! Lol. With that being said, nicely done 🍻
...and she said, _'No it's not, you're just inadequate.' _" -Alice Young
Damn, I just gained 10 IQ points 😎
Theodore Bierbauer r/woosh
@@noambelder5850 he's just saying facts
Theodore Bierbauer but isn’t gaining knowledge allowing you to gain IQ? 🤔
Joker 7 nice , now you have an iq of 10.
Great...u have 20 now
Best argument supporting the Moon landing was one I heard from Stephen Fry. It basically goes, at the time of the lunar landings the US was in a Cold War with the Soviets, and the Soviets didn't claim it was faked.
Thats not much of an arguement really.
How about the apollo 11 interview where the 3 actornauts are acting like they came back from a funeral. I think if you just came back from the most important mission ever you would feel proud and tall. Not like a baby puppy that had its food taken away.
Look in there eyes you can clearly tell. Unless for some reason you do the greatest mission ever and just think its normal to act this way. I know i would feel untouchable and powerfull. They couldnt even get there stories right hahaha
@@SauronSatan if,you were on the moon,& saw what they saw,you would act the same,..they had been de briefed,not to say what they saw.which is why,we never went back,only send out satelites..the moon,should not be there.HINT.
harry walker we did go back to the moon, multiple times
@@phantomwalker8251 i think that sounds a little to x files or outer limits haha. Good idea alot better than most people say thats for sure. But certainly not reputable proofs.
Like there is hundreds of nasa blunders that just make anything they say so unbelieveable, you got don petit on one report saying he would go to the moon in a nano second but we dont have the tech to get there anymore, it was destroyed. That answer alone is laughable. We are in the year 2020 and there saying we cant reproduce tech from the late 50s early 60s.
Than you get conflicting stories from the apollo 11 actors. 1 says he saw stars one says he doesnt remember, maybe they saw some. And the other just plan says " i dont remember seeing anything"
Than you get guys like neil disgrace tyaon saying oh the starts you see from space are wonerful the colors are amazing! If necessary i can add links too all these blunders/ fails. But i feel everyone has probably seen them by now and has some.bogus answer for all of them haha.
Just like " if you dont believe that there is a tesla floating in space with a manaquin and a go pro attached to it you need to be locked in a room." You know ypu can actually zoom in on that tesla and the guy is smoking a big joint and watching porno at the space drivein! Dont take my word for it. Bust out the p1000x and check for yourselves!
@@SauronSatan yup,theres a lot of crap out there,im just putting out comments to try find some truth,but,most comments are,''check your meds''?.that,is not,what im after.i know for a fact,the moon is populated,not by us,or wasnt,might be now,black opps.nasa speaks with 2 forked tongues,at least..we are kept dumb & in the dark,2 things,,the dogon tribe knew sirius had 2 stars,we didnt know that till we had telescopes,,sumerian tablets tell of mining & the creation of man,to mine for them,they were here thousands of yrs before we were created..your education,is enough to function,be usefull,even if you had 16 billion dollars for education,you still wouldnt know the truth.if we share 99.6 % of dna with apes,,why havnt they developed speech.??.in how many millions of yrs we have been here.?..enki,,enlil,,marduk..aliens..
Claiming the moon landing is fake is the equivalent of an engineer being told by a conspiracy theorist that all of math and science is bullshit.
how many boosters did you get?
@@nunyabiz1780 Did someone tell you that that was a devastating line? "Oh no, someone asked me how many boosters I got."
@@paulbeardsley4095 lol
@@nunyabiz1780 didn't know you were one of those idiots who think vaccines have chips in them
@@williamli4422 Yes, sadly he is.
"If you can build an atmosphere you can fix one"
-Unknown
I don't think so, they are about nuke Mars to create a terrain which could make a stable atmosphere for life to thrive..so.... building the atmosphere is not same as fixing it
@@RR-gr1ni it would be possible to melt the poles of Mars to create an atmosphere but it would take over 100.000 years
Iron Man actually it is
@@carter7100 oh... so let's nuke the North Pole then
@@lucbalr do eloborate with evidence please
Can you imagine actually having him as your personal astrophysicist? Like anytime you have a question or want to talk about something you just call him up or video chat etc. 😂😂😂😂
god i wish
No.... No I can't say I could. He'd just indoctrinate you.
l0l
Ever see him on Twitter? He’s a bit of an ass.
Nah he’s just an old asshole rambling about stuff and thinks he knows everything there is to know and not making any sense when he does say it
We spend the first year of a child's life teaching it to walk and talk and the rest of its life to shut up and sit down. There's something wrong there.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Me: 8:57
thats d
Woah that's actually very deep
BS
Also Neil: sit down, shut up and trust the “experts.”
It's a tired old saying from a tired old man. It's not pithy, its cliche, just like him. NDT is clown shoes
and the Russians, the Chinese, and the Indians have all at the very least orbited if not already landed on the moon… Wouldn’t they have loved to have proven us wrong by taking pictures of the places we said we landed… Instead they did and guess what they found … the landing sites 🤦🏼♂️ with all the leftover debris, footprints, track marks, etc. at all six sites 💁🏼♂️‼️
I could listen to this guy talk about the way he thinks all day. Big thinker.
Listen to Richard Feynman, he would have been fun to sit down with also. He could explain physics to someone who didn't know wet from dry.
fuck you
@@deanjulian6189 hohoho, we got a snowflake with f bombs equipped.
@@war10zx98 LOL i was trollin
@@deanjulian6189 oh, nvm
"Ooo that's deep"-Neil deGrasse Tyson
That's what she said
That's what she said
@Stop Begging there are so many things wrong with those statements that I can't i even comprehend what you're trying to say
@Stop Begging I'm gonna report u
@Stop Begging Damn bro, you’re so unbelievably mature... wow, such a grown man (or woman).😐
The people who think the moon landing is fake are jealous cause they didn't go💀💀💀
Why they can't go anymore it's do stupid to even belive that we went to moon
@@rizwanahmed2432 do you know how much it costs to go? lol
neil armstrong final words were that moon landing was fake so, there is a high chance that it was fake
Maybe, but they're just a bunch of idits that the education systems failed.
@@Joemama-kd3he literally is much more cheaper than funding someone or nations to go to wars for mere oils.
we all know that the earthquake in lisbon was caused by shay comac, the guy in assassins creed that took the artifact under lisbon :D
It’s 1 AM and I just figured out Lisbon was in AC Rouge, now there is no time for sleep
Literally the first thing that popped in my head
imagine if one of these days he just said: "yeah sure", to one of these stupid questions.
He's gotta be tired of answering some of these by now. Ffs, if it was asked and answered on film already, just copy paste.
@Alex the fuck? but you're joking right?
Alex ............... lie? ...u just melted my brain cells one by one by that statement
I was hoping he'd answer like this
Short answer: no
Long answer: noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Let me ask you something...CUD this guy say NOOOO....? Not really...he is an American icon, and IF he dare to say No is God Buy kid!
Hmm.....If a God.....Go to 14,000,000,000 years ago ....Perpetual motion.....pretty Godly time to find out....Something is still?
Just cause the rocket launch was real doesn't mean it was easier to then go to the Moon. NASA documents also depicted a blast crater, then when their vids never showed any, it wasn't supposed to happen like that lol.
There's TONS of evidence against the Moon landing, some debatable some debunkable, but not enough evidence for it, n I don't have enough time to argue it. Channel Jarah White already did that, responded to people, n proved his point. check it out.
P.S Bad things happening doesn't mean God don't exist...there's Karma. ALL significant knowledge originated from the Vedas, which are older than most people realize. this guy is like most people: has a very limited/flawed/biased understanding (or no understanding) of the Vedas. Channel "Playitalready" will address everything i said with details/facts in due time. click his sub/bell icons.
this "scientist" is foolish, and not as smart as he thinks. peace
Where are those telemetry tapes, why did Don Pennit say I would go back in a nano second but we lost the technology and its a painful process to build it back up again, why has no human left low earth orbit since 1972 "allegadly"?
AirPlayRule Hmm ...Conspiracies? Checkout The Twin Towers collapsing and the Third collapsed building from 911....Almost makes the Moon landings easy!
Before Armstrong stepped onto the moon, why couldn't the cameraman see the stars on the flag waving?
And how come they wore belts BEFORE they listened to Van Halen?
@@paulbeardsley4095 Yeah, no one ever talks about that!
The flag wasn't on the moon before the astronuats exited the LEM. What kind of nonssense is that??? Why would a folded up flag be waving and what cameraman?
@@gevansmd Satirical nonsense
@@gives_bad_advice Unfortunately, Apollo did not leave LEO. Radiation levels around the ISS increase by a factor of about 30. In just one week on the ISS, astronauts are exposed to the equivalent of one year's exposure on the ground. So, how do you equate the total exposure data from Apollo to this?
Taking for example, the Apollo 11 flight daily dose of 0.22mGy, and dividing by 24 to find a dose rate of 0.00916 per 60 minutes, gives a dose rate of 0.038014 for a period of 249 minutes. This is about twice as much as that registered by the ISS, namely 0.015mGy for the 270 minutes of the Orion test. Taking this time of 270 and doing the same calculation, the Apollo 11 data would only be marginally increased to 0.04mGy. These figures are nowhere near the 15.1mGy registered by Orion, but they are near to the figures registered by Apollo missions operating in LEO.
When comparing this Apollo 11 outcome with Apollo 7, which was acknowledged to be orbiting in LEO with a perigee of 229 and an apogee of 309 miles, (the top end of the ISS comfort zone) we find Apollo 7 with a 0.025mGy against 0.04m for Apollo 11. The Apollo flight that had been attributed to the highest doses of radiation: Apollo 14 received a 1.27 daily dose rate, which comes to 0.219mGy for those 249 minutes. All the Apollo flight radiation data in the NCRP table compare more closely with the ISS-TEPC data from LEO than they do with the Orion RAM figures.
I don't think we would notice if AI took over. I think it would do it in a way where we didn't even know anything was different. Humans are pretty predictable when you control what information reaches them.
I'm pretty sure Google is alive
Wow i though exactly the same as i was watching.
It's been online for a few years. Not many have noticed.
What if feminist are the ai
AI is already taking over, just not as the movies depicted. There is no skynet. AIs are not self aware (and probably never will be), they are only doing what they are programmed to do. Just look at the UA-cam comment section. Some bots are so good at faking it, that people fall for these marketing tactic.
This guy knows stuff... I think he should try being a scientist.
He is and one of the best in the world
Mya Harris r/woosh
If this is sarcasm, Top Notch❤️👌
@@myaharris8075 r/woooooosh
@@myaharris8075 and kids, keep your cameras ready, this is the example of a dumbass
I love to listen to this man speak.. and relate life..
If sadness didn't exist then we wouldn't know what happiness is.
This is a perfect analogy to why there are so many entitled groups and whiners in the world today. They have never faced real strife or hardship so they think the slightest little bump in the road is hate and oppression.
Holy shit
@@CriticalRoleHighlights square in a dead spo is the 15th century in quality of the world in question and it has been the same picture of a man in a movie called a few we quiz zqqqzqzqzqzqqzqqqzqqzqzqqqqzqzqqqqqqqqqqzzqzzqzqqqqzqqqqzqqqzeqqqqqqqqqqqqzqqzqzqqqwi5rre
@@CriticalRoleHighlights r rsr r ed xrreerrreerreqrree5rrrdqe rdd ed r
Rree esq rrerreeqr
In short lying is harder to upkeep than just doing the truth
Deception only works in the short term.
You’d think the USSR would show the rest of the world how we faked it. Instead, they said “damn, they beat us!”
Yep! Moreover, they tracked, confirmed, and congratulated NASA on the achievements.
@@DemonDrummerand afterwards, both sides resumed the nuclear arms race, because, you know, dick measuring contests are more important.
@@MisterMcKinney Sadly, that they did.
True bill, and the USSR were as crooked as the sickle and as ruthless as the hammer that crossed it lol
Yes because they wanted to claim that they done so as well you idiot🤦♂️
"why fake everything, just go to the moon, it's easier, so that's why we went to the moon" - Niel Degrasse Tyson
ok
ua-cam.com/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/v-deo.html
@@berthacastillo6109 - All debunked. Next? :-)
@@yazzamx6380 is this also debunked.ua-cam.com/video/BI_ZehPOMwI/v-deo.html
@@berthacastillo6109 - Yes. Next?
He's a pretty smart guy, but when you think about it, it's really just common sense.
Some of the things he's saying is obvious, and we all know it. It's just the marvelous way he thinks that lets him see this type of stuff.
He's a very smart guy, and it's not his fault the questions asked were really common sense.
an astrophysicist...yeah you could say that's "pretty smart" lol
Common sense is an oxymoron... there's nothing common about it.
Thats what being smart is.
The moon landing was not faked; the evidence is overwhelmingly clear. From the countless photos and videos to the physical samples brought back to Earth, everything points to the fact that it was as real as day and night. The achievements of the Apollo missions are a testament to human ingenuity and determination. We owe immense gratitude to the scientists, engineers, astronauts, and countless others who worked tirelessly to make this historic event possible. Thank you for turning what seemed like a distant dream into an incredible reality.
✔
No, it’s faked. They aren’t capable of doing that with 60s technology
@@Lしたか平間はまは They were certainly not capable of faking 1/6 gravity and vacuum with 1960s technology.
@@Lしたか平間はまは *MODERN AGE OF 60s/70s*
It's quite obvious you didn't even exist back in the 60s and 70s. It was in fact a very modern day and age. A time of great innovation and scientific discoveries. Yes, we didn't have personal computers and 'smart' phones. But we did have the Boeing 707 Airliner and the successful development of the Concord Supersonic Airliner. The 747 Jumbo commercial jet was just been built, n and the last one has just been rolled off the assembly line. The fastest jet aircraft ever built was the Blackbird SR-71 Reconnaissance Military plane. It's record of 2000 mph (Mac 3.2) plus and altitude of 85.000 ft has never been beaten, other than the Rocket Planes as follows. There were several of those manned Rocket Planes that actually went faster. The X-15 was one of those. It set a record for speed (4.520 mph/Mac 6.7) and an altitude record of 347.800 ft. It was designed to be dropped launched from beneath a B-52 . *And that was just the advances in Aeronautics* Then there are the two Pioneer Deep Space probes (Pioneer 10 March 2. 1972 , followed by Pioneer 11 on April 5) which are now well beyond the outer limits of the Solar System. Yes. We didn't have the Internet back then. However, that smart phone in your hand, and your personal computer had their beginnings back in that time. It was indeed a very modern technological world. 😎
My god why dont you just wake the fk up
Short answer
Was the moon landing faked
No, no it wasn’t.
Rebel09 ua-cam.com/video/bGRXR85c1SQ/v-deo.html
Facts
#Fax
Irrefutable argumentation there. Excuse the sarcasm.
You're an idiot just like this liar Neil
Statistics is the best and worst type of knowledge anybody can ever learn. Just depends on how you choose to interpret them
Three types of lies
1)lies
2)damn lies
3)statiatics
Fake news said Hillary was a 100% next president of the States. I made a financial decision based on their polls. I lost many tens of thousands of U.S. dollars. No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq! The theory of evolution is one of the biggest lies ever told. Truth is NOT determined by popular vote.
@@tmo4330 "neil is a clown" says the guy who made a financial decision based on fake news. 😆
@@MiracleTurtle Did not know the news reported polls that were rigged. Never trust something just because you see it on TV. No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, no woman president (thank God), no truth to the theory of evolution and absolutely no moon landings. We have been played. No more!
Statistics is an assumption of what ight happen. I think he is wrong when he says that there will always be one person who flips heads 10 times in a row. There will be a time when it is down to 2 and they both flip tails. There will be a time when 1000 people flip tails on the first flip, it may take 1 in 1000 to the 10th power but it will happen.
He has the most respectful theory of God.
Yes, he respectfully said Fuck god
@Ghustle4
Do you feel the need to just argue with every Christian
GHustle4 Come on, why are you soooo negative towards Christians? Do we offend you?
@@Youprolydontknowmen It's all good let them have their satisfaction of trying to drag people down to their level I won't respond to it.
@@isaac-739 I was just expressing how I felt when he said he's fine with thinking of God a the creator not sure why that annoyed or offended anyone.
But haven't been back in 50 years. Faking documents is really difficult apparently.
Faking an event that was repeated several times while the space budget peaked is hard to do if you want to convince all the scientists and engineers.
In addition to what Aurora said, even just faking the paper documents that still exist is not plausible. There are millions of them, and they all fit together.
@jackietreehorn5561 but they somehow went 6 times from 1969 to 1972. Also our debt is in the trillions, when did we start worrying about how much things cost? 52 years and we nor anyone else has ever landed anyone else on the moon. Pretty sure it's just old people that still believe this. Bet you got all the covid shots.
@@paulbunyan9241 Oh dear, so as well as being an Apollo denier you're an anti vaxxer.
You're just addicted to conspiracy theories.
also, props on putting the moon landing question that’s on the thumbnail as the first answer he gives, in this age of clickbait someone would’ve put it in the middle so you have to watch the whole video
which is easier go to the moon or fake it I say just go cause it's easier and cheaper sure the Russians might fake it cause propaganda but the us meh it's cheaper to just go then fake is so that's why Nasa just went for it simple🤣🤣🤣
Tyson strikes out in his un-answer to the moon landing question. There is no reason for NASA to scrape the whole moon landing systems and their designs unless the US government was in a rush to cover up the fake achievements.
As a “scientist”, Tyson must address the critical questions of shadows in the photos and the flag’s waving in the videos. But He didn’t address the legitimate questions at all. Consequently, Tyson reveals that he himself has zero capability of independent thinking. People like Tyson and Tony Fauci are doing the most disservice to scientific community.
wasn't much of an answer, to be fair....
it was a HORRIBLE answer even for homeboy! lol
@@mhrgall
Terrible answer
"We have a profound inability to understand statistics" - awesome
4got 2say, it was Benjamin Disraeli (also a mathematician) who said the same but put it across far better & first (but then Mark Twain did say it & claimed it) & now the Grass is reading it to us off his electronic prompter like all actors use. The Grass had repeated old, very old stuff here & even subtly made it his own without changing it's simple message. The Grass was never in much despite having to have his equity actors union card for his minor roles before landing this acting role of an amusing friendly sounding chilled-out astrophysicist. I bet he makes up for his overly niceness by being a real bitch at home
Lol the ending. Everyone laughing now, but in 100 years we will cry.
Benjamin Quellier Yeah true. I mean I’m not the type who believe that the world will end cause of AI. I think it’s quiet stupid to believe that.
You guys alive in 100 years? 🤔
Jose Solis dead
Not me😊
@Benjamin Quellier
You’re talking a major breakthrough. By then the quantum world has begun. AGI would at least be 10k times faster than a binary computer( AI ). But hey , who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Neil is the only person that can talk a lot about something without giving us any real information on anything but makes people think he said something profound.
The only person? Are you joking? The U.S. is about to elect a President based on nothing but big empty talk.
I wish he was my professor growing up.
grimerj he was a professor for one of the teachers at my school. 🤯
@Tara Jack this man is an actor. And an idiot. I feel like I'm listening to a first grader demonstrating his first grade science experiment. The fact he used the hypothesis on how AI will pass judgement on mankind for the way they destroyed earth, is indirectly using God's law of governing. You know why? Because mathematically it had been proven that a binomial text resides within our dna scribed, "I am Lord." Human behavior naturally moves under such command beyond conscious control. He is an idiot.
He's one of the reason so many students have been failed.
Templar 1312 Why U mad bro? Did he make fun of your god?
Even when Neil's high he makes more sense than most people.
he's not high, just stop it.
Even when he's low
Is always been funny to me how people that gets high on whatever their choice of drug is they will always say this:when im high i can see things more clearly,i saw the thruth,i found the meaning of life....😂😂😂😂😂😂 and the meaning of life is what?? Smoke a joint??? 😂😂😂😂😂...come on!!! You found the meaning of life and you just gonna keep getting high?!?!?! Wtf??????
guitorb actually he doesn’t. I would love to debate him. This idiot once said on the Stephen Colbert show that the Big Bang was caused by two black holes colliding....and it was so bogus you can’t find that video anywhere.
@@KBADWAY
you must debate him while you're both high