The Anthropology of the Right
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 вер 2024
- PDS Debt is offering a free debt analysis. It only takes thirty seconds. Get yours at PDSDebt.com/WH...
Link to my second podcast on world history and interviews: / @history102-qg5oj
Link to my cancellation insurance: becomepluribus...
Link to my Twitter- wh...
Link to my Instagram-www.instagram....
Bibliography
The Ruling Classes by Gaetano Mosca
The Rise of the West by McNeil
The Story of the Americas by Leland Dewitt Baldwin
Forgotten Continent by Michael Reid
American Nations by Colin Woodard
The WEIRDest people in the world by Joseph Heinrich
Why Nations Fail by Acemoglu and Robinson
War, Peace and War by Peter Turchin
The Art of Not Being Governed by James Scott
Seeing like a State by James Scott
The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by Shirer
The History of Philosophy by Bertrand Russel
Democracy the God that Failed by Herman Hoppes
Atrocities by Matthew White
The Origins of Political Order by Francis Fukuyama
The Soul of France by Fernand Braudel
A History of Civilizations by Fernand Braudel
The Best of Times and Worst of Times by Michael Burleigh
After Liberalism by Paul Gottfried
The Leviathan and Its Enemies by Sam Francis
Politics by Aristotle
The Pursuit of Power by McNeil
Tragedy and Hope by Carroll Quiggley
The Evolution of Civilizations by Carroll Quiggley
Enlightenment Now by Stephen Pinker
The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant
A Conflict of Visions by Thomas Sowell
Envy by Helmut Schoeck
Dominion by Tom Holland
The True Believer by Eric Hoffer
The Dictators by Richard Overy
Bloodlands by Timothy Snyder
Sapiens by Yuval Noah Harari
The Invention of Yesterday by Tamim Ansary
After Liberalism by Matthew Rose
Destiny Disrupted by Tamim Ansary
The Master and His Emissary by Ian McGhilchrist
Japan and the Shackles of the Past by Taggert Murphy
The True Believer by Eric Hoffer
Shadow World by Chandler
The Righteous Mind by Haidt
The Strange Death of Europe by Douglas Murray
Islamo Leftism by Philippe Fabry
Fire in the Minds of Men by Billington
Political Order and Political Decay by Francis Fukuyama
War in Human Civilization by Azar Gat
Impressive that "Rudyard" managed to make a 50 minute sequel to his left anthropology video in just 2 minutes.
He speed reads and talks fast. 😂
CoD QuickDraw perk enabled
it really makes you think...
He made them both at once .
No, really? How do you know?
For most of Western History, "Conservative" meant "Royalist".
You’re gay
For good reason too.
For most of Western History, there was no such thing as a "Conservative."
@@luan0020Religious-non-technical civilizations don’t see themselves as places were they linearly move forward morally nor technologically. This is why tradition was the norm. Back then wanting to conserve tradition wasn’t called out since things seem to be correct the way they were and risk wasn’t taken as productive for society.
Today is the opposite, as the society rushes forward to nihilism and the idea of a morally optimal unknown future.
Not for the Americas except for things like the Aztec or Inca monarchies. But for north America most societies were traditionally organized as tribal confederations the structure of which influenced some aspects of the American constitution.
I'm a straight white 37 year old male that has a wife, three kids and a dog.
*Far Right Extremist!!
;'-D
Ironically both left and right people just make up boogeymen to justify their perceived victimhood to them re-justify their beliefs.
80% of people are normal and know it ain’t that deep. They just spend their days staring at the 10% they don’t agree with on either end
I'm 32 with 1 kid and another on the way, I've been an atheist all my live but I'm starting to wonder if maybe militant catholicism is the way hahah
@@Legalizeasbestos That's why I don't like to debate politics online. People immediately start assuming the stereotypes of the 10% on your side apply to you.
@@smallpiper2
It is the way
I'm a gay white 22 year old that has a boyfriend and two cats
But I like guns
*far right extremist :(
UA-cam really showed their hand. This video has ads. The Anthropology of the Left does not have ads.
Opposite for me 💁♂️
You get ads? UA-cam just deletes my comments.
From what I’ve seen neither have them now, surprising absolutely nobody.
This literally doesn’t mean anything
Probably because he talked about anti-semetism for 10 minutes in that video and the algorithm flagged his video
The best part about having border security is not having crime.
The best part about being a conspiracy theorist is not having myocarditis.
You’re gay
People keep forgetting that COVID gave you a higher chance of myocarditis than the vaccines. Why would China or Russia do mass vaccine rollouts if they were terrible?
I do agree with the borders Point since I think you can't have a country without borders.
"not having myocarditis." Cries in double jabbed 😢
Yeah can't understand Rudyard calling the truth "conspiracy theory" all the time.
"What future do you want?"
Have you heard of Senator Steven Armstrong?
The righteous will succeed
You're not crazy....
YOU'RE BAT S#1T INSANE!
Or on the other hand, you can live in ignorance and purchase your happiness. When blood and sweat is the REAL cost, thinking ceases. The truth is lost.
@@hismajesty6272 those are the lyrics of phase 1 against him, phase 2 lyrics are raiden realising that he does have a point, he isn't exactly what he thought he was and they have things in common.
@bmetalfish3928 God, Metal Gear is such an autistic and based franchise.
Was literally just wondering why I haven’t had a new whatifalthist video in over a month. I’ve now been gifted with two.
Rudyard was too busy hitting the podcast circuit 😏
@@lucasglowacki4683 Rudyard loves the shorts
You’re gay
We don’t deserve him
Shining a light on both sides at the same time. This is the way Rudy. 🙂👍
The more I study politics, the more I thank God I found Him, because nothing humanity builds will ever last forever.
Amen 🙌
Indeed, there is no Utopia that mankind can create, here on earth. Every man-made ideology is flawed because of human nature and our corruptibility. Humans cannot be deconstructed and re-made in the image of another mans' ideals. We cannot put our faith in men and once we know this, God brings peace to our lives.
That is why we have room to improve upon It to make It better.
@@kkjppt5359 As a Muslim well yeah I kinda do that already, its in our religion.
Praise Yahweh made manifest in Jesus Christ
I like aviation, weight lifting, and running my own business. I'm clearly a dangerous, extreme far right mad man.
What?
Hitler is that u? Lol
@appa609 He means normal ordinary straight white males are all far right extremists that a threat to democracy. What’s so hard to understand about that?
Luftwaffe phenotype
Rudyard: A legitimately philosophical Christian Society involves demons being taught in psychology textbooks, adultery being illegal, and churches being the top social network.
Me: Don't scare me with good times
It's scary and unpallatable to the Western mind to think that adultary (or sexual license) in general should be actively discouraged by the state. Reality is that marriage is the foundation of a strong family. If we weren't endlessly propagandized by selectivepy portraying "needful" cases of divorce and "happy" divorce, the general perception would be that family breakdown tends to scar children who grow up to be scarred adults, and all things being equal, will become less capable of contributing to society as an adult. Marriage and families are yet another artefact to be offered up on the altar of freedom, praise be unto its name.
Yes those are the goals I assume everyone was pushing towards too.
I was basically in the “I was already for it, you don’t have to sell it to me” meme
Is a marriage held together by threat from the law really worthwhile? Better to have the truth known I think then to hold onto something that shouldn't be.
Deal me in. Sounds like a reasonable path towards this elusive “utopia” societies have been clamoring for.
Demons being taught about in school would be awesome.
It wouldn't be actual demonology or spooky occult stuff it would be some guy rambling about mental illnesses. Mental illnesses and things that are very real would immediately be reduced to "Satan magic" and we would never progress from that point. Remember, at one point some guy saying the Earth was round and rotated around the sun was considered blasphemous witchcraft. All the "fun"and informational modern things would be banned or heavily guarded by religious puritans. Modern conservatives are not ready to part ways with their own sinful ways no matter how much they complain about it on Twitter.
Don't worry they already do classes covering Reagan and Thatcher
It's called drag kids story hour.
Yes and tucker should be the teacher that’d be gold! Just picture him calling out all the tyrants and calling them demons while giggling in his classic laugh 😂
@bmx13andit52 Tyrants are the tools of demons, not demons themselves.
I don't want all these inventions, I just want freedom.
The rate of technological progress has slowed significantly since the 70s too except for communications. Right around the same time as the cultural shift.
Freedom to do what and for what purpose?
Freedom to be human??
Freedom is an oxymoron. Humans are domestic animals, you setting your own rules based on our domesticated society is just safely wandering rather than free will and “freedom”.
@@CristianmrWuno A free man lives by his own law not those of the government. Just the fact criminals exist show their are disagreeable people who are not "domesticated" and instead live by their own rules. The fact that people with the know-how can just exit society and live off grid is an act of freedom
So the choices are:
Monarchs, Merchants, and Marauders.
F in chat for humanity
Ws in chat for monarchy
I pick the monarchy. The king cares more than the merchant. The merchant only wants to make a quick buck. The King is held accountable for the wellbeing of the country and when a rebellion occurs they know who to overthrow.
@@hismajesty6272 Why doesn't the King of the United Kingdom currently care about his people?
@@jboss1073:D
@@jboss1073does he have a kingdom ? Does UK even matter ?
Essentially, it’s not the left versus the right, it’s the left versus everyone else
This just shows that, again, the right is more tolerant. There's many flavours on the right, and they can debate each other.
The left, is a religion, or a cult, if you don't comply fully to the doctrine, you're disfellowshipped.
"God Damm Liberals!!!"
@@briish4615F*cking hippies
Left versus left as well.
No, they're the pawns. Not the players
DOUBLE DROP LADS GET IN HERE
drop top
Present and accounted for.
German, and I'm tired of pretending otherwise
ew
Grüße aus Texas!!
Grüße aus Hessen
@@samuellblake oh hey look this guy is doing GSR right now lol
@@Guy-Mann shaming is a typical female trait but men also shame people.
Whatifathist is the best at dropping a video during the right political climate
Type shit
@@TioMogiyou’re both gay
Its criminal how Polish history and civilization is forgotten.
Forgive my ignorance, but isn't that largely because of its indefensible geography, it was constantly swallowed up by neighboring powers?
@@c63amgblack Twice. And the powers you mention nearly have broken Anglo-Saxon rule. Both cases involved a lot of effort by England and British Empire.
@@c63amgblack But since you have mentioned the geography. Isn't the fact of a semi independent Polish state in 2024 impressive enough, without even looking into the science and economics?
@@c63amgblackconstantly is a stretch. It was truly only “swallowed up” in 1795, but that did last 123 years ;)
@@marcingaladyk yes it is, when did the surrounding powers nearly break Anglo rule?
um yes, I do want the Christians to win...I want adultery to be outlawed and demons to be taught as real things. I want all that comes with it.
giga based exorcist chad detected.
@unscsSpartan1180Ni for adultery to be outlawed, it first has to be socially unacceptable. For it to be socially unacceptable, Fidelity has to be the socially desirable alternative. How can that be achieved?
@@user-pz4ir9rf6iinstilling it our children
@@UNSCSpartan118ONI a Spartan taht follow a Syrian ideology ....shame
while i dont agree with everything that would come from that i would take this over what the woke has planned 10000x over
After watching anthropology of the left I assumed this video would take a month to come out. We were spoiled today.
Edit: just wanted to say that British conservatism can absolutely create radicals willing to fight to the death. The promise of owning something is powerful to those that own nothing. I can very easily see fanatics fighting to destroy monopolies and big governments to take what they have, a sort of weird hybrid between communism and British conservatism.
Last thing: democracy’s tendency for equality can go in two ways. 1: nobody will own anything and so everyone will be equal. Or 2: everybody will own something and so everyone will be equal. The first was explored with communism. The second has yet to be explored, but seems to be the logical conclusion of a British conservative country like America.
reminds me of oversimplified part 2's
havent watched the video yet, hell I havent even finished the one on the left
In a recent History 102 interview, he even said he had a 3rd video ready to go, so the next one shouldn't be over a month away either
>The promise of owning something is powerful to those that own nothing.
This is probably what the next western revolution will be over, once some new counter-elite group decides to take it up as a cause (since all revolutions are performed by some form of elite seeking to usurp the existing elite, even if the cause is itself on behalf of non-elites). A whole generation of young men who will own nothing, no house, no land, just eternal rent-slavery to the ownership class. In such abhorrent conditions, why wouldn't they fight to own something?
Trudeau says "housing must retain its value" because it's the boomers' retirement fund. But that means zoomers and younger millennials will never own homes (since the government won't let the market correct) AND we know that our society is built around using a house (which we will never have) as a retirement fund which means we know we won't even get to retire.
America has played itself out. So, what comes next.
'the rich will get richer and the poor will get poorer.'
It seems to be inevitable, that even if we could balance wealth out equally at any given point in time, some would spend their given wealth quickly on consumable goods, while others would gather up durable assets and build wealth again. I don't think equality is ever possible, simply because of human nature and the different choices people would make for themselves.
Hallelujah 🙌🏻!!!!! Your channel has been a huge part of my transformation, God is good 🙌🏻🙌🏻. I was owing a loan of $49,000 to the bank for my son's brain surgery, Now I'm no longer in debt after I invested $11,000 and got my payout of $230,500 every month…God bless Ms Susan Jane Christy ❤️
Congratulations!! The scriptures clearly states there's going a transference of the riches of the heathen to the righteous. God keep blessings you
Hello how do you make such monthly??
I'm a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down🤦🏼of myself because of low finance but I still believe in God🙏.
Thanks to my co-worker who suggested Ms Susan jane Christy
She's a licensed broker here in the states🇺🇸 finance advisor.
After I raised up to 525k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸and also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.
I’d like a combo of “British conservatism” and Christianity. Respecting property rights while also being anti degeneracy to rule the right in the future. They would also ally with places like the Mises Institute.
Wait, have I seen you in Arthur Greenwood’s comment section before?
@@hismajesty6272 idk who that is so no
15 years old?
Personally I'd prefer an Orthodox or Baptist theocratic oligarchy.
The Old Testament pre-David shows what God's ideal form of governance is: government by prophets/priesthood. Get the right priesthood and you're gunna be ok.
I look forward to the next thousand years of colonizing space under this ideology. Or maybe it will only last a century because hyperdrives are completely fictional devices that can never exist.
No way you mentioned the fact radical Islam has marxist roots, i was reading a book stating radical Islam back then was a revolutionary ideology created by former-marxists in MENA. With the goal of creating a State based on Islam.
Politics makes strange bedfellows.
Modern Islamic leaders tend to be men with very close Western ties, often being born in an Islamic country but then being sent to liberal Western schools and universities.
Nonsense. Islam's normal state is radical. It has been radical since it was it was founded in the seventh century AD. Did you know that North Africa used to be entirely Christian? That was until Islam invaded.
Islam IS revolutionary.
I was reading about the baloch insurgency in Pakistan and was surprised to know that all of those rebel groups had names with "Marxist Leninist"
We need an anthropology of the up and an anthropology of the down.
So you’re proposing we make a S.O.A.D. parody band? I’m down.
anthropology of the forward and the backward
The Anthropology of the B
The Anthropology of the A
The Anthropology of the Start and The Anthropology of the Select
The Anthropology Konami Code!
Totally agree. As far as I can tell both Left and Right hardcore wilfully ignore/obfuscate the massive impact of Class. When you substitute "Class" for "Dollars" the incentive to hide it when you are wealthy or powerful is strong. It's not even a perverse incentive, just a straight-out incentive. The only historical solution that seems to have worked in having a broad set of competing power bases.
I disagree with your view on monarchism. Not that it is more stable in certain circumstances, but how it ended. It was due to the capitalists gaining so much wealth they were able to influence the populace. Monarchs and capitalists are at odds, as a capitalist would want the government to pass favorable regulations like we saw on Florence, Venice, and even today in the US. Monarchs cannot be bribed as they have no reason to accept a bribe. As a result, the capitalists fomented the rebellions that created republicanism. They were effectively counter-oligarchs to the oligarchs and the monarchs in the European monarchies.
Well, some monarchs can/got greedy ,were evil or just stupid. Yeah,by &large they can't be bribed.Reminds me of Sultan Abdul -Hamid the second ,the last Ottoman sultan who refused to sell Palestine to the zionists in late 1800s .I think non-hereditary monarchy can work in today's world
@@abdirahmanbadal781 the problem with that is no matter what, the monarch can be corrupt. In order to be elected as ruling monarch, you need help from others. That means you're going to owe people very big favors. This is where capitalists, aristocrats, and lobbyists can begin taking over de facto control of the country. In a hereditary monarchy, this is impossible as the heir is guaranteed the position at birth. The only way an elective monarchy can possibly work is if the monarch is a baby when elected, however it can end up like the Bush family with Bush Senior making his son pay his debt to the Saudis. No matter how you cut it, there is going to be a major issue. Do we accept that occasionally we will have a bad ruler who will rule for life, or do we adopt a more Republican style of governance where the oligarchs of society inevitably become the de facto rulers. It's an impossible situation.
The only times i can think of monarchs being susxepible to bribery is when the country is actively collapsing due to a fiscal crisis, such as Russia selling Alaska, or France selling Louisiana
Realistically theres very little you can bribe a monarch with that they cant just get for free anyway
A fellow Lavendar viewer?
@@hismajesty6272 I recently discovered him, but I was on the path to being in favor of monarchism for the last few years. He kinda pushed me over the edge
Him: they have no idea what a Christian takeover would look like. Proceeds to list 3 things I am perfectly ok with. Though likely the demons one would be tempered as one of the primary thing exercises are taught is to eliminate all natural solutions first. Similar to how miracles have to go through huge process to be confirmed.
47:14 "a Christian society involves demons in psychology textbooks"
yes
"Adultery being illegal"
Yes.
"And Churches being top societal networks"
YEEEEEEES! COME TO PAPA!!!!!!!
yeah tbh
@@scurvydog20 47:14 "a Christian society involves demons in psychology textbooks"
yes
"Adultery being illegal"
Yes.
"And Churches being top societal networks"
YEEEEEEES! COME TO PAPA!!!!!!!
I’m much the same. It’s important to remember he’s referring to the secular types who really don’t want Christianity, they want Christian Morality separated from Christian Dogma. Essentially they want the benefits of having a firm moral standard, but don’t want the added responsibility that comes with aligning oneself to that standard. A kind of Lukewarm Christian Institutionalism, where everything is based on Catholic social teaching but every actual reference to Catholic Theology is removed.
Believe me I’m all for everything he says. Demons are very, very real and need to be taken into account when dealing with certain kinds of afflictions. Certain obsessions and addictions can be diabolically influenced into happening. Adultery is terrible for society because it just adds incentives for men and women to hate each other so it should be at the very least heavily discouraged if not straight up illegal in writing. As for the last point, if the Church succeeded in gluing society together and fostering sanctity for all the years up to the Protestant Rebellion and even beyond it can fix the problems of today. We’d just need a people psychologically capable of actually comprehending its necessity.
I don’t think it should be tempered and that’s not me trying to be more “based” then you are. Demons don’t necessarily have to possess someone to cause mental distress or problems. And they’re methods of determining which is going on.
Being raised in an Amish-Mennonite community I don’t know what is right or left. This community is called communist because they share resources and labor. What really happened is they decided to skip the industrial revolution. If we believe that birth rates reflect happiness, they and other religious groups are the most happy people. Skipping right and left labels and simply skipping industrial civilization of capitalism and communism is the only hope for humanity.
@@tomconrad7091 I see the most attractive Mennonite women in my area in the hills of Northern California and I’ve completely had it with my social landscape with the pool of women to proper standards so small I’m like often joking or am I about becoming a Mennonite and marrying one having kids and living that life
They can only exist with in a larger industrial society that protects them though. Everyone reverting the pre-industrial living doesn’t work from a resource-management or a game-theory perspective.
@@fabsmaster5309 What a rediculous sentiment. Do you believe mankind was born with our economies and technologies in our hands?
No. They exist just fine without your stupid short sighted and utterly ignorant perspective. If all of our larger industry disappeared tomorrow, you would be starving and they would be laughing.
Being acommunist within your extended family is nothing like the kind of communism the left envisions.
Who maybe thinks a return to Christendom
The only option that even has a prayer of salvaging this. Christendom lasted undivided for almost 1500 years and fed our forefathers before the Protestant Rebellion. The current liberal order fell apart in under a quarter of a millennia because it incentivized people to put God anywhere other than first.
Ave Christus Rex ✝️🇻🇦
Me! (I’m an Eastern Orthodox Christian ☦️ Convert!)
As long as it keeps out of politics.
@@InfinitePlain no
Sanitized of superstition and based in epistemology and phenomenonology
Intro -- Previous explanaitions.
6:10 - Part 1: Peruvian Rightism
15:35 - Part 2: Britsh Rightism
25:41 - Part 3: German Rightism
36:24 - Part 4: Muslim Rightism
47:22 - Conclusions
Thank you sir
I think, out of all my years of studying, I've narrowed down what each political leaning is or fighting for in one word:
"Far"/Radical/Dissident Left: Equality
"Moderate"/Centre Left: Justice
Center: Freedom
"Moderate"/Centre Right: Truth/Honor
"Far"/Radical/Dissident Right: Beauty/Harmony
And if there's one HUGE distinction it's that the right wants to achieve complete unity with nature/god(s)/universe/cosmos/reality, while the left sees a problem with it. I think that's the biggest underlying aspect that I so often see in the patterns.
this is really interesting, but what do you mean when you say beauty and harmony? Also what would you say about the leftists that consider themselves christians and god lovers nowadays?
@@gangsupere Thanks.
My comment is obviously a vast oversimplification, but sometimes that is useful for certain discussions. Any of these groups can exhibit other values as well. I just think these values are what most adherents to each group value most on average, from what I can tell after years of layman studying, and out of evaluating what people are just saying.
As for beauty/harmony, I'll try to explain it the best I can. I can clearly in my mind see what I mean, but it's another thing articulating it 😂Think of how the anti-lgbtq is far more amplified the further right you go, or how further rightists will be anti-immigration more for racist or social harmony reasons unlike more center rightists that might cite economic factors. Think of how further rightists are far more politically incorrect when calling people UGLY or FAT, the polar opposite of beauty. Observe how admiration of typically beautiful art and music is more prevalent among further rightists, and how the left for example claims how that type of art and music sets "unrealistic" standards, is colonial and racist and white supremacist etc. By harmony it'd be more specifically like being more strict in enforcing and ensuring these beautiful standard, unlike more center rightists that are more compromising by acknowledging that someone else's perspective can also be true, and their honor among the wider group stops them from doing what further rightists want to do.
Freedom is best typified by the people that basically go: "Let me just grill and drink beer in peace."
Equality seeking is sort of like justice, but justice doesn't HAVE to have an egalitarian. It's more about reaching what can be perceived as a good compromise for most or all. Solely equality-seeking is much more militant, hence the "far" or radical left. It's best typified by the communist belief of all workers owning the means of production, and everything that has happened as a result of trying to achieve that historically, because it's impossible, but the equality-minded doesn't care because they want to equality.
This is why I think each of the most radical wings exhibit these more uncompromising values than the other groups.
I think Christianity can be (mis)used to justify a lot. Maybe it's their way of transgressing the Christian doctrine by claiming they are Christian themselves. It's a typical leftist tactic. But not sure.
Hi !
I don't see much of "beauty/harmony" sentiment on the far right. Instead, I think they are deeply bent on "Safety" as a core sentiment, which makes them hold on to traditions hardcore, just because it feels safe. What do you think ?
@@GaëtanKlein I disagree. To an extent all groups do their stuff to ensure what they perceive as their safety. But if for example you look at leftists they're very passionate about creating their own safe spaces. Right-wingers for example value safety so their societies are safe from criminality. But no ideological group uses "safety" as their core slogan. They're generally more idealistic than that, and use higher words to rally their supporters for. Contrast it if you used "fighting for safety" or "fighting for beauty" or "fighting for justice", the latter two sounds much more inspiring for their followers. And being far right today isn't really safe, yet people are so saying that's their primary value is just dishonest.
If you read my reply to @gangsupere maybe you'll understand what I mean by the "beauty/harmony" concept.
Your comment seems more like an attempt at a "gotcha" than a factual evaluation.
@@HuWhiteDeath yeah, I agree with you, I just didn't see your point about inspiration. But it is true safety is a catch-all, not specific to far-right.
47:16 he says this if it’s a bad thing.
*battle hymn of the Republic intensifies
47:14 "a Christian society involves demons in psychology textbooks"
yes
"Adultery being illegal"
Yes.
"And Churches being top societal networks"
YEEEEEEES! COME TO PAPA!!!!!!!
Yeah they’re not bad things. Demons are very real, adultery is terrible for society so it should be at the very least HEAVILY discouraged if not blatantly illegal and Churches were the glue that held society together for over 1500 years until the Protestant Rebellion. However actually living out life in accordance with Christ’s will requires one to seriously realign their worldview which most are generally unwilling to do. A lot of people want Lukewarm Christianity to continue existing because it asks nothing of them personally, but it simultaneously defends them by using those who are more zealous. Even I’m far from perfect in this and I’m a practicing Catholic, Latin and all.
I can’t imagine the more secular types would take the transition all too well. I made the transition from completely secular to focused on faith relatively smoothly because I already preferred belief in objective moral standards and already had a preexisting, self made honor code. All I had to do was tweak a few lenses and wipe off some grime to see clearer. Most people only do what serves their own interests and the idea of intentionally handicapping your own ability is seen as nonsensical. Those people would need an entire ideological rework to even begin the journey I took because from their perspective everything I’ve done would make no sense. Even my family who’re relatively similar to myself didn’t really understand the turn initially and I’ve had to re-catechize them from scratch. Thanks be to God they respect my judgment enough to actually listen, I’d be devastated if I lost them in the process.
Went here to comment this lol, he just described my ideal society
@@captain0ffd244 47:14 "a Christian society involves demons in psychology textbooks"
yes
"Adultery being illegal"
Yes.
"And Churches being top societal networks"
YEEEEEEES! COME TO PAPA!!!!!!!
Nice video. From a Hispanic libertarian regarding Peruvian conservatives, the majority of people in Latin America didn't embrace communism, communists became terr*rist guerrillas and k*lled a lot of people starting civil wars all over the region after 1959. Then the people begged the different military to take power and ext*rminate those guerrillas. That's why Pinochet, Videla, Bordaberry, and everyone else got into power.
However, after these military defeats, Castro came up with the idea of "21st-century socialism" to now use the renewed democratic system to take power and never go away. Now using ecologism, human rights, feminism, anti r*cism, etc. to trick people and win elections. That is how we got Chávez, Lula, AMLO in Mexico, the Kirchner Thieve marriage in Argentina, Evo Morales, Boric. And most of the people still vote for them. Even though they have the old terr*rists from the 60s and 70s in their ranks (the same people their grandpas asked the military to er*dicate)
The National Socialists definitely did have an idea of the human (or racial) soul.
Except that they severely underestimated their number 1 enemy.
They have an idea of an Aryan nature or soul and no concept of a universal human nature or soul.
@@jboss1073 How's that?
Yes, they certainly did. I was shocked when he said that.
@@christophersnedekerWell, they believed in others having their own culture and nature and destiny by God as a people. But, yes they believed in an European Aryan soul.
1. Demons in psychology textbooks? Based!
2. Adultery being illegal? Based!
3. Churches being the top social networks? Based!
I'm for the based American "fundamentalist" Christian state.
So, we need Capitalist Crusaders. Deus Vult and Free Markets combined. I like it.
Mammon is in opposition to that
That's called Objectivism.
Yes, as long as we also have chivalry and charity to widows and orphans and keep crony capitalism and lobbyists and corruption out of it. Respect the dignity of the legitimate poor, but do not enable the lazy and envious. Virtue, humility, charity, and diligence.
Capitalism, an idea so good it has to be mandatory.
@@Lusa_Iceheart capitalism is rejected by the Catholic Church in favour of corporatism and distributism
babe wake up whatifalthist just posted about the anthropologies of the left and right
Europa: The last battle.........Puts the modern world in a new light.
Where can you watch it?
@@TheP0dcastHub oldbitchute
@@TheP0dcastHub YT is at it again so 0ld. 8ite chut3. There are a few video site. YT, RUM, and two versions of the one I am refering to. The old one is best.
@@TheP0dcastHub 81t..........Chute........
@@TheP0dcastHub Sorry YT at it again.
2:55 so what you're saying is... the right is wayyyyyyy more diverse than the left and wayyyyyyy more accepting of all kinds of groups from all over the world....
In the age of scarcity, belonging to the group and loyalty to the group is the end-all be-all of your life to navigate and combat said scarcity. Be it the Frankish Empire, Mongols, Romans, Abbasids, Carthaginian, Aztecs, and many more (these civilizations are different in many ways, but similar in many others)
Even in the age where nationalism is still in its infancy, these people work the same way all around the world; that being trying to make sure your group flourish in spite of other group
That is why the right is as diverse as it gets, everyone's spawning point is scarcity, and it breeds in-group loyalty
The left, especially the modern left, works under the assumption of post-scarcity worldview in which in-group loyalty could be seen as something bizarre, thus said loyalty could be criticized and be labeled as something bad, like calling it fascism or nationalism or any other denomination
No. A Christian nationalist from Louisiana would never accept a Hindu nationalist from India.
A buddhist right winger from Burma will never want to cooperate with a Muslim right winger from Bangladesh
Only if you simplify the entire left as "communists"
"all Asians look the same"
Diversity is not a virtue and neither is being accepting.
"Demons being taught in psych textbooks, adultery being illegal, and churches being the top social network" sounds good to me.
Fine with me as long as we can still emphasize studying the Declaration of Independence.
Sign me up now
God Wills It!
@@CodyseusRex I personally don't think His big idea is government lip service but it's not like it would be the downward spiral we have now: ua-cam.com/video/j0xhu4KaLvw/v-deo.html
Lmao you don't actually believe demons are real right?
This is the best Monday we've had.
Nice pfp
nice pfp
"it's unmistakably a right wing group"
That statement about choosing Fascism, or Communism is so true.
I’ll chose the first because while it’s oppressive, it’s ideologically inconsistent and could eventually swing towards loosening up like Spain. Most of the Commie Bloc just collapsed for rights to come back.
@@hismajesty6272 its not inconsistent. You may have a flawed understanding of national socialsim.
To be concise, as a german who has had some deep insight into the german-style not only by history, but by family and personal experience, I believe that german-style...what is the point, let's just say a national type of socialism paired with a religious society is the optimal way forward.
Besides the cultural warfare, the biggest issue of these days is that unregulated capitalism is screwing the majority of the population, due to our economy being based on a ponzi-style model that is centralized banking. It is fundamentally designed to rob the poor and enrich the elite.
Before we discuss culture or religion, the economy must prosper or else revolution is inevitable in the long term. German type socialism aimed to create a functional economic system which worked EXTREMELY well for not only generating wealth, but especially raising the quality of life for the AVERAGE person. This brought a sense of spiritual unity and kinship which united our nation.
To break it down to the most fundamental level, a country needs moral values, a functioning economy and a culture that promotes unity to flourish.
Christianity provides moral values that not only prevent degeneracy but also unite a country culturally, as history has sufficiently shown.
German socialism supports similar values, such as being united culturally and helping each other, while also providing a functioning economic model (restricted capitalism) that generates wealth but prevents capitalism from straying too far and e.g. selling hazardous foods just for short term benefits, like the US is doing right now.
The pillars of the ideal society are therefore german socialism and christianity.
Let's not forget that culturally and economically, german socialism succeeded. It was not defeated because it was flawed. It was defeated by war.
That being said, some aspects clearly went too far and should be addressed and kept in check, but exactly that is Christianity's mission - to set moral boundaries.
Also you should not be so quick to dismiss a christian-ruled society, as even the CIA basically admitted that they dabbled into the supernatural with some success. Most of the greatest minds of history were convinced christians and very well read on esoteric traditions and the supernatural. Be a bit open-minded and don't dismiss everything immediately, just because you grew up hearing it was superstition.
The biggest problem is that it was based on a military economy and therefore needs enemies. To maybe make the economic model work u would need some non militaristic greater good with high industrial needs. In my opinion. The only thing that comes to my mind is space exploration and pushing for expansion there as well as building monuments like a Dyson sphere.
Because I am really afraid of the destructive powers the ideology can have as well as the ability to turn people into not thinking monsters.
Btw. Wenn ich fragen darf was ist deine Sicht auf die AFD?
Ye, pretty much. If Mr. Mustache was an actual Christian and not esoteric, occult fascist then the whole thing could work. Worst part is, there's even place for esoteric, occult Christianity which appeals to military. The thing is, it has to be limited to military and the state cannot be just the military. Exactly the SAME how state can't be just the church, look what happened with whole Papal fiasco, muddying waters and producing more schisms for hundreds of years. Or exactly how you can't have state be just the merchants, that just ends up in corpo dystopia down the line.
You gotta balance these things out, they don't have to be 1:1:1 but they sure can't miss whole third or even two out of three pillars of civilization. Great thing about Christianity, especially Orthodox kind, is that it's very much open ended. While Islam and Judaism really hamper down on "do this/don't do this" and are very much rules based, Christianity has rather small emphasis on day to day control of your behavior. What it often asks though, is to be involved in your decision making, to be constant chip on your shoulder. Basically, it doesn't remove agency, nor is it isolationistic. Issue with first monotheistic faith is that it's isolationistic and sort of "this is just for us" thing. Issue with last monotheistic faith is that it openly cannot exist unless it's 100%, and it will do that any means necessary.
Out of three (we're not counting Zoroastrianism lmao) monotheistic religions there's a clear "winner" for a moderate right person in the West. Similarly to that then, one should evaluate different branches, with them being Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox. Once again, the issues are clear, Catholicism is too strict and really insist on this whole Pope thing which is an experiment proven not to work, truly biggest social experiment of Europe, two steps behind though. Issue with Protestantism is the fact most people will answer "Which one?", which is a problem in itself. It's so loose and lackluster that there's zero way to reform it, unify it or do anything useful with it. Organized faith cannot exist in climate where you could get excommunicated in one part of your village, then proceed to build your own church three streets away. I won't even get in the whole no icons, churches that look like business or anything like, just looking at it from a practical stand point.
So what's the issue with Orthodoxy? Honestly, the orthodoxy. Best part about it is that it's the same Christianity from 3rd century, but that's also the worst part, it's very stagnant and inert. Neat part about it though, it's both modernizing in past 2 decades (only around 10 years ago Orthodox priests started using internet to actually proselytize) and there's cultural agreement (all be it , this is cultural, among the Greeks and Slavs) that it's not church's job to do the progress, but soothe the herd. This is why most eastern societies split into warrior and priest classes, with Darwinistic people running states while Christians run the moral background of the society. No idea how Orthodoxy could work with addition of merchants though, it has never been done as far as I know. Maybe you should look outside of Europe and find Orthodox Christians elsewhere, it's on the rise in US, China, Japan, South Korea, perhaps there one could observe how it interacts with merchants.
I want a fusion of German style warrior spirit and British style economic freedom with a Christian domination of morality.
Your dissection of Islam was quite illuminating. Kudos.
Is the stock market actually getting better or is this the Election time manipulation to entice new investors, I'm currently sitting on an inheritance of 300k and i'm wondering do I invest in stocks or Gold?
buy bitcoin! it is decentralized and most secure, thus healthy competition among many miners
market crash is inevitable, but there are actually strategies to mitigate risk and profit consistently, tho such executions are usually carried out by investment experts
Agreed, people often underestimate the role of financial advisors. Over 50 years of data reveal that those who work with advisors typically earn more than those who do it alone. I've been fortunate to work with one for 5 years now, resulting in a million portfolio.
i'm blown away! mind sharing more info please? i am a young adult living in Miami where i've encountered several millionaires, and my goal is to become one as well
*Layan Talia Chokr* is the licensed advisor I use. Just google the name and you'd find basic info. To be honest, I almost didn't buy the idea of letting someone handle growing my finance, but so glad I did.
As a non-American viewer of your work, I wish to see the reemergence of the German right.
And realistically, that's the only option around I see on the continent.
The is almost no Peruvian right left in Europe, Islam is foreign to our psyche, and we don't have much of the shopkeeper mentality developed in the British right. Basically, British right parties were astroturfed into Central Europe after WW2, but since the post war generation is now about to die off, the artificiallity of it all is clear to see. For the average German man, there is no incentive to join the establishment conservatives (CDU/ OVP/ SPD etc).
I'm 32 and somewhat out of my generation (I mostly mingle with 20somethings) and I see all of them being more and more open about being what you termed German right.
And I myself like the developements.
You are right about mainland Europe and British Right not being popular there.
That’s probably why we see the continual rise of “far right” movements across Europe.
The problem really is whether you are going to have enough population to support the German rightism movement. With the ethnic replacement happening in Europe right now I can imagine Islamic rightism being the only feasible option, and the German rightists converting to Islam in order to atleast secure a victory against the left and continue into a messianic Islamo-fascist hybrid
@@nessesseda yes wonderful to see. And it’s really common sense I see nothing far right it’s Asinine labeling. Islamic immigration is something only a feminist matriarchy would do or guilt ridden aspects being manipulated to accept cultural suicide. The powers the pre existed always were afraid of Germany and did anything to keep them down. All of Europe practically is Germanic, France by franks, England by Anglo saxons and then Norman’s, austrogoths across Austria Italy and east and Visigoth’s Spain and France, even the kieven Rus has Nordic origins. Love seeing Thuringia and saxony, but as we see in America or with marine la pen, these people are realllly pushing to keep this sane rational movement down
Good luck to you mate, because the Islamics will try to force their way by outbreeding you guys. Strike while the iron is hot, I believe in you and your people.
I don't want to see it.
Especially the Germans do not deserve such after what they have done and continue on doing under different ideologies.
German rightists, unite!
It's really the only of those 4 that was not defeated by arguments or culturally. It was only defeated by war. But war will topple any cultural model if the country loses.
And while it was implemented, it worked culturally and economically well.
@@hiriasbloodweaver8593 it prospered partially in Spain, well into 80s. It’s known to work.
Franco really was the goat
@@kezhaofficialFranquismo was quite different from the German model.
Also, econonomically didn't work in th first half of its reign. It did wonders in the later half though.
Also, its very tame compared to the German model.
@@hiriasbloodweaver8593 Interesting points. Putin's Russia seems to be gradually coalescing on a similar model in the modern day. China and Iran perhaps too.
The 12,000 lb grizzly bear that everyone loves to poke. This will end well 🇱🇷🙏
“All nations end up as a monarchy”🇺🇸👑
#legalizemonarchy
God Save the King.
@@hismajesty6272embarrassing
😂
@@hismajesty6272
We need an emperor
I grew up Jewish but have become Christian for some context. I would vote for British rights. Just looking at history I think makes it the clear winner. Even if I I doomed to eat itself, none of the other societies have created places that can remotely compare with the Anglo world. The best places to ever have lived were all British or former colonies. It's the only one to conquer lands and make them better.
I think its problem is that is created, not by human hands, but larger forces. Easy defensibility, bountiful lands, and a pre-established wealth.
Get your people to stop flooding the West with the third world
Angels rejoice when the natural branch is grafted back onto the olive tree
Please don’t get the British credit for making America great, lmaooo
America is Anglo, yes. But Britain had zero role in making America what it is today. Anglo-Sphere unite 🇺🇸
@@kcck7588 Its mostly the Saxon part that made America great and a little of the Franco part. Everything we accomplished was in spite of the Anglo
Hitlers Strength through Joy program was not putting a cap on the Working class living standards, but raised it.
yeah the segment about germany had some obvious flaws, perhaps my guy tried a bit too hard to find some negative points about this system.
@@hiriasbloodweaver8593 I still think his video overall was great, I appreciate his effort.
Starting a world war is something which tends to cap the working classes living standards.
@@luigimrlgaming9484 Hitler didn't want the war, and tried to stop it when it started. But okay
@@luigimrlgaming9484 was hitler the one who declared war on england and france? Of course not. if you actually knew anything about the germans and the world wars, you'd know that painter tried multiple times to reach for peace with the rest of the west. In which those pleads were ignored, and then they all declared war on him. Ask yourself why?
For the same reason I'd rather be right than wrong I'd rather be right than left.
You probably think that's clever when it just sounds stupid.
@@mrmadmartigan397 Aw so mad
Wow
@@mrmadmartigan397 when I read stupid crap I ignore it, so imo you didn't actually think he said something stupid you simply disagree with him ideologically...
You can only learn and grow as a person by being “wrong” and making mistakes. Kill your ego.
The only thing that would be "right" is Rudyard oiling up
Or if he LEFT his clothes on the floor.
Lets calm down guys
@@therealspicybadger5071 It puts the lotion on it's skin or else it debates vaush again.
TIKHistory has the definitive UA-cam’s on Socialism.
Agreed.
That man is very clever and has exceptionally deep knowledge of socialism and national socialism
New Crusade to save america? Antbody?
Deus Vult
🎶Glory, Glory, hallelujah!🎶
No use doing much for anybody else, America ain't Rome they don't have lions. But Texas does,
Unironically I’ve had an idea about creating what I can best describe as “military fraternities” structured, stylized and organized in a similar manner to the Knightly Orders of the Crusades. If possible I’d even want it officially on The Catholic Church’s roster of official orders. I was thinking of naming it “The Military Order of St. Michael the Archangel for Lay Persons”. In honor of the Archangel Michael, Prince of the Heavenly Host and the one who drove Satan out of Heaven. With a focus on recruitment from the laity.
The idea is twofold. First and foremost to give men access to the training and tactics of a modern military, without forcing them into the government system to do it. Hence the military part. The second half is to do what the military doesn’t, namely to incentivize true brotherhood and not the brotherhood used for the callous expenditure of human lives. As well as to offer education on matters of Faith as well as education in crafts and trades. Hence the fraternity half.
Combine the two together and you’d have an organization that prepares men for every part of life, making them equipped to handle both peace and war. As well as giving them a space to organize, find job opportunities, study various fields and possibly even enjoy leisurely activities should there be any space left. A society that does not adequately equip its men equips itself for naught but destruction.
I just know I’m 100% not the guy who is even remotely qualified to actually do any of this. I’m a broke ass bum from the south with zero military experience. This is merely an idea, a flight of fancy that doesn’t want to go away and I felt compelled to write it somewhere. I guess if you like the concept spread it around, maybe it’ll reach the ears of someone who is much better equipped to actually undertake the effort. Hell I ain’t looking for recognition, straight up steal the idea for all I care. I just want society to exist healthy and with God at the Helm.
@@My10thAccounta lot of this is naturally occurring irl at many churches wether prot, cath or ortho. Though I wouldn’t publicly speak about it irl or online unless you’re just discussing building fraternities to create unity between churches and clubs in the churches. A lot of guys are interested in military stuff and guns so it happens organically anyway
Monday double feature?! Rudyard, you’re spoiling us now.
Im a British rightist in good times and a German rightist in bad times.
I want my kids to feel confident in their ethnic heritage, a safe community, younger parents so we can give our kids more freedom to play on their own, an education system that serves them for history, and culture, math and art, and just take away some of the struggles I had growing up, such as.
White guilt, stupid gangster rap, black worship, over sexualized pop music, the annoying HR and evil DEI at the expense of competency.
what about rock? don't take away my rock music!
A society that rewards merit, embraces responsibility and accountability and works twards a goal bigger than one's self.
Far left and far right are about giving power to a minority, who those advocating for them believe will benefit them personally not society in general. Democracy in theory is an ideology that aims to please a majority often at the expense of minorities (that is the trade off). I have always found that if my fellow citizens are given all the facts they will make the best decisions for their society (see Brexit and Trump in 2016). i.e. democracy is an ideology that can adapt rather than trying to dogmatically apply one set of ideas over eons. All the problems we are seeing in the world are because elites are usually narcissists and believe that doing what plebs want is a threat to their power (which it often is). As Noam Chomsky said (not an endorsement of everything he says). "The answer to subversion of democracy is more democracy, more freedom, more justice". That is why we are being flooded with incompatible cultures. Democracy only works with homogenous societies (and borders). The minoritarians on both sides are trying (and succeeding) to create low trust societies where democracy is impossible.
Some far left ideologies like anrcho communism, libertarian socialism and market socialism are about giving power back to the people.
National Socialism is considered to be on “The Right”, but by all accounts it was a socialist movement, therefore the political axis system is largely invalid. Just a refresher, socialism means public control of the means of production, so please remember that. It’s true that there are noteworthy differences between Marxist Leninism and National Socialism, but it mainly comes from the fissures between National Socialists and International Socialists (Marxist Leninism). I hope you take the time to consider that. The origin of the “Right” and “Left”, comes from the French National Assembly, and where the Royalists and Anti-Royalist factions sat; nothing more, nothing less. Remember to avoid making the mistakes that our politicians make on a regular basis, because these words that echo out of their deceitful gullets, aim to divide and subjugate the people into their political camps, which-mind you-does nothing to defend the values that the settlers established for us.
The argument of origins of terminology is no magic bullet , a dictionary politics; the correct term that covers the whole problem is "Stateism" fascist or communist etc are all encompasses by it, look up Herbert Spencer "The Man versus the State"
Libertarian capitalism and globalist free markets is socially left wing while national socialism is socially right wing. The left right matrix is over simplified
@@elasticharmonyI agree that Statism is another definition that works best for describing the political system, you’re right. The main issue I have is that people are being constantly conditioned to believe that the political axis (in it’s current form), is applicable to diagnose policy, which it no longer is due to Marxist socialists and National Socialists refusing to accept that they’re both very much Socialist. If leaders on both sides use distorted terminology, that blurs logical reasoning. I think that the main ideological battleground of the 21st century will be Nationalism or Multiculturalism/Multinationalism. I suppose that everyone’s just mad because nobody understands what each other means anymore. I suppose I understand now, how nations die.
Um, no, not really. The Left and the Right originate from the French Revolution based on where members of the Assembly sat based on their overall views of the revolution and its ideals, thus generalizing the "Left", who supported the revolution, as representing equality, progress, secularism, and the like, while the "Right", who opposed the revolution, came to represent hierarchy, tradition, organized religion, and the like, and these are some of the defining tendencies of the Left-Right political spectrum that almost everyone has used since. Notice how state power or use is not, _never_ has been, and _isn't intended_ to be directly referenced by this spectrum, as it merely is a taxonomy of the values and worldviews that can inform one's use (or lack thereof) of state power. Thus, according to such a definition, due to Marxism being revolutionary, cosmopolitan, egalitarian, and the like, this firmly places it as an Left-wing ideology, while Fascism being reactionary, xenophobic, hierarchical, and the like, firmly places it as a Right-wing ideology. At most, you can call them both authoritarian or illiberal in how they go about implementing their values, but it is both theoretically and practically important to be able to recognize that they have not merely different, but mutually exclusive, worldviews.
@@thek2despot426 I believe we’re in accordance with regards to the original meaning of these terms, and I don’t have a problem with that. The issue is around the scapegoating and Ill-gotten support earned from distorting the meaning of these words. I don’t have the time to sit down and explain the nuance of The Socialist Schism, but if there’s something I think you ought to ponder: If the German regime instituted a NEW system of public control of the means of production via the Fire Decree of 1933 and ultimately the DAF, arguing for a new a (racially) equal system that enforces a state decree over the equality of labour, even uprooting the German Aristocracy, how that would not be considered a revolutionary state? If the Communist “left”, supports progress, and the “right” supports the old regime, how could Germany be considered a “reactionary” state?
UA-cam, please stop deleting my comments. I simply want to post racial slurs in peace.
I asked a wise English friend to explain English society in one sentence. He said, " Culturally Catholic with a hard core of classism."
They walked all over Catholicism in Ireland for decades.
England hasn't been Catholic since Henry the 8th.
@@johndeegan7696”Culturally”
Your friend is uneducated
You shared your favorite quote. So I shall share with you mine...
On principle, we should be suspicious of explanations for other people's beliefs and behaviors when those explanations imply they would believe and behave as we do, if only the were as mature and enlightened as we are. - Richard John Neuhaus
As long as the Christian radicals aren’t anti-intellectual and more like medieval Christianity that was the primary driver of progress, I am not only okay with, but enthusiastically support. I couldn’t begin to describe the war crimes I would commit in a civil war if it meant that America would embrace radical Christianity
So what exact;y are you trying to say?
That’s the kind I wanna push for. An intellectual led Christian state, based in Catholic social teaching.
Look up Patrick Deneen’s post liberalism. I think you’d like it.
@@hismajesty6272 Will do
@@hismajesty6272I think a range of Christian doctrines could work well on a societal level. I think a more spiritual perspective is needed to pump life back into the western world. While it can have some unexpected results, I think psychedelics are largely beneficial to spirituality. It would lead to many more genuine believers than forced conversions and avoids much of the bloodshed of executing unbelievers.
As long as the psychedelic revolution continues, I think atheism will continue to decline and we will see a very vibrant religious culture return to the western world. My one worry in a Christian society is that this revolution will be suppressed once again.
OMG we get a double feature! This is so friggin awesome!!!
I think most Western conservatives, at least North American conservatives, do want some form of classical liberalism/British conservatism. They want a robust middle-class, and for the government to have minimal control over their lives. The big question is, what is needed to support that?
It seems that the right is lacking in a shared story to unite them. Some want to unite around Christian values, some around ethnonationalism, and some have no concept of any uniting force beyond smaller government and freer markets.
And, of course, we see a lot of the ethnonationalists pushing a form of Christian ethnonationalism which focuses on Europe's Christian history, but ignores Christian values or the truth of the Gospel. I think similar to this is someone like Andrew Tate, who declared himself a Christian, then a Muslim, because he thought islam was a stronger and more masculine religion. I.e., his religious beliefs aren't based around truth, but power.
Islam has the momentum.
Islam also has an excellent record when it comes to dealing with the left once in power.
I want a British constitutional monarchy where the King is a genuine executive of the state, rather than just a figurehead, and where voting rights for for electing Members of Parliament are restricted to white property/ business owning family men of good character (with exceptions for exceptional people who would otherwise not qualify).
One thing about forms of State is that it depends on those who would act in these positions, today there are no laws restricting Charles from anything only his actions.
Hey what about poor working class family men, what what happens when they are not represented and organize a coalition against the elite? The only answer is repression. The problem with rightist ideology is its complete inflexibility to the will of others outside of its perceived elite. And the answer to your problems always leads back to repression with varying levels of brutality
@@bigkroner766 People who imagine these systems very rarely imagine themselves being outside of it.
What’s white mean?
I think AngloCeltic is the word you are looking for.
Pretty sure you don’t want masses of Eastern Europeans voting in the UK.
@@elasticharmony That's what Parliament is for.
Uncle A.H.'s speeches have been translated and are available for a listen. You're going to wonder why you've been kept from hearing it. ⚡️⚡️
I want to know which sources did you read for latin america? Because the church were allies of the indians against the common spanish colonial, and the king of spain worked actively to give better conditions that criollos (spanish born in america) were against it. This sound like the common anglo propaganda against Spain.
Rudyard seems to have a pretty strong anti-Catholic outlook.
Rudyard mentioned those things in his prior videos on Latin America. I don't know why he didn't include them in this one. To steelman his case, I'd assume he either forgot, omitted it for the sake of narrative clarity, or (what I suspect) he put church and state together since the marriage of church and aristocracy is usually how it works in the rest of the world, which allows him to make a clean "Peruvian conservative" category without having to subdivide it between Latin and non-Latin and such. I should also note that 19th-20th century Latin America was not wholly the same as Colonial Latin America in terms of power dynamics, so maybe he was talking moreso the post-independence juntas and anticommunist Cold War governments than he was the old colonial viceroyalties.
German style... we want German style.
Its not about what we want its about what we will get. and what we get is what the winner decides. That is reality. You have zero choice. Winner takes all.
If gravitate to the right because I felt God in their movement. I am not naive, I know most conservative are actually not christian, but its the one who is not actively working on building a "utopia" separated from the Lord. If its not from God, I don't want anything
Most of my life, the vocal Left has been militantly anti-Christian while the Republicans generally have payed lip service to God. On the one hand, I have a Left Wing that says I'm a fascist and theocratic for not wanting porn and condoms in schools. On the other hand, the "Far-Right" figures like Tucker Carlson are bringing on guests who say to spend less time on politics and more on prayer. Many conservative Christians are insincere, and many days, I fall into that insincerity too, but maybe we're God's useful idiots.
We shall unite under the new german right and fight for god and fatherland, just as we used to. Let us all stand together lest we all fall apart - united by Christianity.
The German Right was the only one which didn't fail on its own inadequacies and internal contradictions, but by overwhelming outside force. Long before it could even reach its final, pure Germanic form.
A tragedy the entirety of the West suffers existentially from today, even if it refuses to admit it.
I guess you could argue that it's greatest flaws were too much ambition, confidence and too little diplomatic acumen. It simply asked too much of its people at once and underestimated the sheer magnitude and ruthlessness of the forces arrayed against it. A classical fatal blunder in warfare and statesmanship.
Fascism is more of a centrist ideology.
Modern Germans aren’t even the same “Germanic” people from the past.
@@kcck7588The true Germanic will was bred and bled out of its populace. All that's left is ruin.
They did fall due to their contradictions. Their bravado and idiotic foreign policy of backstabbing and endless aggression created a system that became despised by the whole world and caused everyone to gang up on it. Similar to the Aztecs and Assyrians being too brutal for anyone to like.
Part of the reason the Nazis had to go to war was the economy would implode otherwise, and then the weakened German economy then had to support all of Europe which caused untold problems.
Keep in mind the Nazis spent a decade and a half in power, almost half the time as the Italians. Mussolini gets credited as the person who finally unified Italy so I think it sheds light on which one did better.
As a German who has studied the literature of the “conservative revolution” a lot in recent years, I have come to the conclusion that this very movement has a good ideological basis for the future of the right. German conservatism all the way.
“Conservative is to create things that are worth preserving.” - Arthur Moeller van den Bruck
Every knee shall bow, every tongue confess that Christ is Lord
There are no gods. Dream on.
@@glad777 bless you, I don't have such a high degree of faith that I could believe such things
I want Victor Orban European right wing that provides for its citizens minimizes mass migration and also wealth inequality. Hungary is the model.
Switzerland is a far better model
@@MisterWebb Switzerland 6% Muslim and accepting at rates similar to the European Union and the Uk. Hungary .04% Muslim and refuses to take in any
Switzerland is an aberration.
Orban's anti immigration stance is pretty much the only thing he deserves credit for. The economy is saddled with a kleptocratic oligarchy, so much for wealth inequality. All his meddling could not make a dent in the spiraling birth rate, it did help re-inflate the real estate bubble though..
@@MisterWebbgive it ten years, its going into the garbage bin.
Cant be a conservative and a satanist...
Styxhexandhammer may disagree
@@michaelwellen2866wolf in sheep clothing
@@thwooop9994 He's on the side of good.
ban the talmud, got it
Rightest know exactly what we want. Small government, low taxes, and no communism.
Hitler was a socialist. Not a conservative.
Always keep that in mind.
There is no such thing as “radical IsLame”, there is only IsLame
Jihadism is built into the religion and its law (Sharia)
You would have had your British supremacy if they just sided with Germany in W W 2
Had Mosley come to power WW2 never happens to begin with.
@@laszlokiss483 Exactly brother
Highly doubt It.
Germany at the time only had the interests on themselves, not others.
@@emilioperez6888 not starting a war with wider western Europe and defending Europe from communism aligned with their self interest though.
@@emilioperez6888 No, they said many times it was also to protect Europe and its civilization and culture from communism
Prussian socialism is more effective than Anglo-liberalism, as one can see in that the German war industry was seven times more effective than the British. The only reason Germany lost the world wars is that it was fighting the whole world because the elites of the liberal countries (communists are liberals too) were envious and feared for their own power, Germany was on its way too become the worlds biggest economy before 1912.
Nahh.
The germans destroyed their financial system by doing that
It's one of the reasons the revolution happened in Germany.
They played the inflation game harder and therefore lost harder.
This. It should be obvious, because while it allowed for the benefits of capitalism, it set moral boundaries to prevent the disadvantages.
Prussian socialism emphasizes seeing your people as your neighbours and friends, to stick together and help each other. So it's capitalism, but less of ruthless competition (USA) and more of a team project of working together and helping each other.
This is also why it was considered christian, it's literally built on christian values.
It's more about high trust ethnic homogeneous societies with a strong religion and heartland, the specific of the flavor of socialism, ideology and intellectualism isn't vastly over emphasized while race, criminality and family structures are underplayed for various reasons mostly being taboo to support
Guys, I think that’s just Germany being Germany. Even today, Germany is the biggest economy in Western Europe, it’s no doubt the heart of the European Union, and Germany for the longest time has been the heart of Europe. When Germany is unified, it’s immensely powerful, and it exercised this power by fighting every other major power twice in two world wars relatively well before succumbing to the pressure. The only reason Germany didn’t demonstrate such power before was because the Holy Roman Empire was never a very unified nation.
That’s probably why France was so powerful in the beginning, because it unified before any other European country could. They became the heart of Europe for a long time, before eventually being supplanted by the British and falling into disarray themselves during the revolution. After the brief stint with Napoleon, they basically fell into irrelevance and now we’re just one of the many European Countries and no longer very dominant anymore.
Your ideology lost. Get over it and pick a better one.
I want:
1. Distributed power bases
2. High social trust
3. Responsible citizenship
4. Unlimited liability
5. National service
6. Direct democracy (Swiss style)
7. Social mobility and opportunity
8. Social safety nets
9. Universal suffrage
10. Strong borders
11. Conservation of nature and resources
12. ... not sure how to say it, but strong participation in global organisations without compromising the sovereignty of the people... this one is real tricky, I think for any "rightist" this balance is the hardest thing to describe and get right
13. A Moral Code, or functional equivalent
just wants to go back in time, the future is now old man
You want Hans Hermann Hoppe Libertarianism.
As a leftist I have to say, based.
About half right. Direct democracy is dumb see Plato’s republic and his critique of it
@@MattieK09 Authoritarianism is dumb as people tend to govern in their own interests.
To answer your final question: I want beauty and victory, get rid of ugliness. I want HuWhite power, not kidding about that at all.
I don't care what color the 'power' is, I just want it to be Christian. I agree on beauty. I want order and wholesomenesss too, with a touch of chaos added in for interest in the form of natural events and minor forgivable human errors.
We will not achieve perfection this side of heaven and we should not expect to. But at the least, we can minimize ugliness and abject evil.
@@oneperson5760 You should care. The race you are is the one you should strive to be more powerful.
@@oneperson5760demographics is destiny. Hope you'll learn that one day.
@@HuWhiteDeath I am Christian, so I'm not interested in seeking power. I seek Jesus.
@@oneperson5760 He was powerful
Two!?
Mickey, you're too late.
Everybody gangsta till WhatIfAlthist goes into a Drive Form.
You mean Everybody gangsta till WhatIfAltHist starts shouting X-Blade.
Holy double feature Batman
As an Australian; Holy testicular Tuesday, Batman!
47:12 I understand, I want the Christians to win. May America remain a Christian nation ✝️
"remain"
America hasn't been a Christian nation for at least a century. America must be reclaimed or reformed.
@@sethd.8381 the United States has the highest population of Christians then anywhere else…..
Its very much a Christian country
If not the most
@@haydenkemp7193 Americas Christianity must be revived, we are in dire circumstances but we are the last best hope of the west. Christianity shall never die, the west might.
@@nickharmon2157 how are you in dire circumstances?
You have freedom to do whatever you want?
47:14 "a Christian society involves demons in psychology textbooks"
yes
"Adultery being illegal"
Yes.
"And Churches being top societal networks"
YEEEEEEES! COME TO PAPA!!!!!!!
Hello,a muslim here.These are few corrections i would like to bring to your attention :
1 "wahabism " was the original Islam .It is based on Quran,sunnah(ways of the prophet )&hadith(sayings of the prophet) .It is not that much different from the other "forms" of sunni Islam. Every muslim cleric knew /knows .I dnt know why people see it as a new thing or demonize it . The reason is wrongful association with "islamic " terror groups . Remember the "khadvidles" of 1600sAD in Ottoman empire &Ibnu tayymiyah of 1300s AD.
2. According to your map ,Somalia belongs to the African civilization but that is not the case .In fact ,it is the frontier of subsaharan Africa&the middle east(it is part of Arab league) .It is Culturally Islam ,with an afro-asatic language(Af somali) ðnically extends all the way to North Eastern kenya,eastern Ethiopia &Djibouti.
13:00 you are going to need a bit more of an explanation than: if society move fast stable thing can't last. In many ways, one person will be able to respond much faster and more effectively than an entire state apparatus. Monarchy lost it's foothold in the west with the decline in the power of the Church and the rise of leftism (which are, of course, linked)
Never have I felt so much sympathy and empathy for radical Islamic fighters
2 videos - 1 day. We are truly blessed
I can tell this will be a good one. In just 6 months I went from being a republican (little r) to being a postliberal traditionalist, so it’s fun to be part of the more dynamic side of politics.
Now you just need to unravel the obvious lies of Cuckstianity
What exactly is a postliberal traditionalist? Maybe I am one? I was a lapsed Catholic, tepid average american, but now I prefer the Latin Mass and wear a veil at church and want my children to get married young and have lots of babies. I used to be into some liberal sorts of ideas, but they leave a bad taste in my mouth now. So is that postliberal? I'm definintely trad.
@@oneperson5760based
@oneperson5760 Post liberalism is a rejection of the notion of capital L Liberalism, which is individualistic and afraid of limits and enforcing the common good. I’d recommend Eudiamonia’s video on it, or any lectures by Patrick Deneen (both traditional Catholics) for a more detailed explanation. As far as being a traditionalist, I don’t think there’s a good definition but I’d say I reject rationalism as an ideology, as we’re barely ever rational in new “innovation,” and I find it better to lean on cultural traditions and old ways and values. Another good critic of Liberalism who takes on that angle is Carl Benjamin, a British political pundit. If you’re a Latin Mass Catholic you’re probably mostly in line with Postliberal Traditionalism or almost there. God bless you
-a sympathetic Protestant
I think you're doing the Alternative for Germany movement dirty by lumping them in with National Socialism as the "German Right". They are different in terms of religion, foreign aggression, and economic policy. About the ONLY similarity they have is operating in the same culture while having (at least nominal) respect for that culture.
My answer for what the future of the right is... Crypto libertarians who believe in decentralization, individualism, and volunteerism.
Anarchists will always be conquered by those who can organize better.
It would be weak and eaten up by a more powerful and organized state. Individualism leads to isolation and isolation leads to weakness.
The answer is Hoppe.
@@hismajesty6272Your authoritarian fantasies will get us nowhere.
If you want to save the rhite wace you must oppose the state, because it has only ever been used to weaken us.
Your fantasy of harnessing it to benefit our people is idiotic. Look what happened to Germany: The people thought they were getting a Rightist who was on their side, but instead he destroyed their nation, established a certain state in the Levant and made racialism taboo forever.
The same thing will happen with Drumpf.
Have you considered ironic dystopian techno-fascism?
Who would win -
A religion that single handedly dominated the graveyard of empires
OR
A Chinese video app boi!
lol
The flaw most people make with putting the Nazis towards the right is that they look at the racial aspect, but don’t understand how Nazis understood race. They thought that compared to all others the German people could be perfected with social engineering (a very leftist ideal). They also believed that some groups could never be perfected and those groups would hindered the development of the ultimate society. Many early socialist-progressives had similar beliefs that certain groups would hinder the development of a utopia.
Very few of them believed in the "master race" nonsense. Hitler himself didnt. That was almost entirely Himmler's nonsense.
What they RIGHTLY believed was that human populations can be made BETTER through selection in the mating process.
The fact that people think this isn't true is insanely frustrating. These same people can fully understand how humans have bred plants and animals selectively to avoid bad outcomes, but the SECOND it involves a human it's suddenly different.
These are the same people who claim not to be religious, it's absolutely hilarious. Suddenly, humans become this entity that doesn't play by the rules of that EVERY OTHER LIVING ORGANISM PLAYS BY.
If it's an ethical problem they have with it, that's fine. That needs to be said, but what is so insidious is that they INSIST on obfuscating their beliefs and being as disingenuous as possible.
Which is fairly accurate if you consider Africa's development during the last 20,000 years.
36:36 After 9/11 I remember seeing a lot of left-wing Western cartoons saying that Islamic fundamentalism and Christian fundamentalism were identical. The only difference is that since Wokeism replaced the Feminist Left of the late 1980's and early 2010's that Islam has been seen as a "left-wing" issue in the West, being basically a weapon to use against the right.
Any religious fundamentalism is spiritually corrupt. God doesn’t want you to go around forcing people to believe in the same thing.
The alliance of the far left and Islamic radicals is not really a new thing
To be real, the British style of Rightism is the best the world has seen. Although it isn't perfect, it is the best system I think the world has had. We need to go back to more of those beliefs with some modern twists to update it a little.
Going from British and German rightism was a trip. I imagine that will continue for some time.
I’d like an Oswald Mosley Style Government to which we never got