Sigma 100-400 vs Sigma 150-600 - which telephoto lens is the best for you? 🤔
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- In this video I will compare the Sigma 100-400 against the Sigma 150-600. If you are not sure which telephoto lens to get, you may find the solution here. Have fun 😉
The lenses were tested with a Sony A7IV under the same conditions.
Sigma 100-400mm: amzn.to/3Z3osU8
Sigma 150-600mm E-Mount: amzn.to/3Z2DERz
My Setup:
Sony A6400: amzn.to/3sJr0L5
Sony A6100: amzn.to/45Cyn5K
Sony A6700: amzn.to/3qW022y
Sony A7IV: amzn.to/3L7Q8l0
Sony A7RIII: amzn.to/3qVgakI
Sony A7II: amzn.to/3L6KeB0
Sony A7C: amzn.to/3R50wOw
Sony 16-35 F4: amzn.to/44GK61H
Sony 24mm F1.4 GM: amzn.to/3OTOQve
Sony 24-105 F4: amzn.to/47QicmO
Sony 70-300mm: amzn.to/3YZbZkC
Sony 70-350mm: amzn.to/47SxaZL
Sony 50mm F1.8: amzn.to/3EkTNIy
Sony 50mm F1.8 OSS: amzn.to/3PomgUm
Sony 55-210mm: amzn.to/44JbQTK
Sony 85mm F1.8: amzn.to/47Za57r
Sony 16-50mm: amzn.to/3L6KbVQ
Sony 24-70 F4: amzn.to/3R5eVtX
Sony 90mm F2.8 Macro: amzn.to/3R2VSjW
Sony LA-EA4: amzn.to/3P4S0w2
Sigma 16mm F1.4: amzn.to/3R6mQay
Sigma 56mm F1.4: amzn.to/3L4GeAE
Sigma 18-50 F2.8: amzn.to/44FOZIu
Sigma 24-70 F2.8: amzn.to/3P3WVgQ
Sigma 28-70 F2.8: amzn.to/3YZqBAm
Sigma 100-400mm: amzn.to/3Z3osU8
Sigma 150-600mm E-Mount: amzn.to/3Z2DERz
Sigma 150-600mm Canon: amzn.to/3L254S0
Sigma MC-11: amzn.to/3qVLboG
Tamron 17-70 F2.8: amzn.to/3PlWZJh
Tamron 28-75 F2.8: amzn.to/3OYuTn3
Tamron 28-200: amzn.to/3L8TRPn
Tamron 70-300: amzn.to/45T8TRd
Samyang 12mm F2: amzn.to/3PkDnpY
Samyang 14mm F2.8: amzn.to/3OZiD5D
Manfrotto Tripot: amzn.to/44CJP03
Rollei C5i Tripot: amzn.to/45YByEN
Oregon Minitrack Startracker: amzn.to/45YBBAt
Rode NT-USB Microphone: amzn.to/45yWsdL
Sandisk 128GB Extreme Pro: amzn.to/45r2e0V
Sandisk 128GB Micro: amzn.to/3YYvMAH
Sandisk 256GB Extreme: amzn.to/3Z2h0c7
All are affiliate links. :-)
Hello bird lovers. I have both lenses. 150-600 perfect for a tripod. Hard to carry. 100-400 light to hand. The photos from both lenses are beautiful. Greetings from Poland.
Thanks for your comment. 👍 You're right, both lenses are very good in their own way. That's why I still own both and haven't been able to part with either lens. Greetings from Germany.
I bought the 100-400mm purely for the weight reason. No point having a lens that’s too heavy to carry around. True the background blur isn’t as good as the 600mm but if you get the right background it doesn’t matter too much. Sometimes for tracking birds in flight you don’t want to be too tight in framing as you can loose track if they change direction. The main advantage of the 600mm is for the tiny birds like Robins, finches etc.
Thanks for your comment. The 100-400 is also one of my favorite lenses. it is very light and compact for the focal length. above all, it is also very sharp
Thinking about getting the 100-400mm. It has greater versatility imo. The 100-400 converts to 150-600 on an APSC sensor or in crop mode on my A7R IIIa. WIth the 150-600 you cant really reverse it PLUS the weight difference.. 1.7 kg is A HUGE difference!! so def more prone for the 100-400mm and it is my impression that people reach out for this lens more often than the other due to its versatility. But great vid buddy, thanks!
Thank you for your comment. 👍 I never know which one to take with me. I love the look of the 150-600 but it's just so big and heavy. That's why I often take the 100-400 with me and live with some compromises.
This is the exact video i was looking for. I'm wondering which of the two to get, and I'm now closer to a decision. I really liked the side by side zoom useful to get a clearer idea of the differences in focal length.
Thank you for your comment👍 I'm happy that this video was helpful for you. What is your favorite lens now? 😉
Just the right video for me. The 150-600 is a bit heavy for hiking. Thinking about the lighter Sigma 100-400. I easily held my old Leica 100-400 for micro 4/3, and it was just a bit lighter than the Sigma 109-400.
Thank you very much for your comment. 👍 I am happy that this review helped you. 😊
Excellent comparison. I thought the extra 200mm would make a much bigger difference! I think I’ll buy the 100-400 today for my a6100, found a good used deal.
Thank you for your comment. 👍 I wish you a lot of fun with your new lens. 😉
@@dawa5581 Thanks mate! I bought it and it should be arriving today. Got it for half price of what it’s currently selling as new, so pretty happy about it. I’m taking it with me to shoot some nature and animals on a road trip to the western coast of Norway, in my gf’s old T3 van. First time shooting wildlife. And yeah I’m on a6100 so getting that extra 200mm’s reach. Could you ask for more?? Stoked!
@@kristiangurholt59 congratulations for this very good price. I also use this lens sometimes on my A6400. 😉
It’s an awesome combination, but the camera looks sometimes very tiny behind this big lens 😄
Thanks for this video as I am debating between both of these lenses. I would prefer the lens that is less weight but I also want the extra distance and focus. Tough decision for sure! Well done with your points on this video,
Thank you very much for your comment. 👍 if you’re not a bird shooter, I would take the 100-400 lens 😉
I made a bunch of tests on my own and came to this conclusion:
The sigma 100-400mm at 400mm f/6.3 is not sharp enough to make use of higher sensor resolution than about 24MP. Through many different tests I could conclude that at 400mm f/6.3, I could never see any difference in detail (when pixel peeping) between photos taken with sony a7c 24MP and photos taken with sony a7c ii 33MP. However, if I switched to my Sony 35mm f/1.4 GM lens, I would easily see difference. This means that at 24MP and higher, the lens was the bottleneck. So just a heads up, if you want to make the most out of e.g. Sony A7IV or Sony A7RV, the Sigma 100-400 is not sharp enough at 400
Thank you for your comment. I used a Sony A7RIII with 42 MP for this test and I'm really impressed with the quality. But I also have to say that there are some differences in the quality testing of sigma and tamron. I also made a video about this on my channel. The differences in quality are sometimes frightening.
Yes I have both lenses for my APS-c camera. However I just got a Lumix S5 and will need one or both of these. Weight is the deciding factor. The 100-400 is an everyday lens for landscape and wildlife for me. The 600mm is heavy to lug around. I have used it for bird photography handheld, with success, but looking for rests where possible. Suits a tripod. So I'm getting the 400mm next and followed by the 600mm noting that these are around £1000 each for good used. Video is excellent and very helpful. (I do have an adapter for my existing lenses but I get vignetting)
Thank you very much for your comment 👍 I see it the way like you do. I have use also the 150-600 for bird and wildlife photography but only once or twice a year and the 100-400 is smaller, lighter and I am using it more often.
Hola, ya que tienes los dos objetivos, cual de los dos dirias que que es mas nitido, yo dudo si uno o el otro para mi a 6700 para fauna.
@@josemanuelnovo725 los dos objetivos son muy buenos, pero cuando lo quieres usar en el A6700 100-400 será más mejor porque pesa menos.
I recently purchased Panasonic S5 IIX with kit lens 20-60 and 50mm f1.8
Now planning to add telephoto lens between Panasonic Lumix S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Macro O.I.S. Lens or may be Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3 DG DN OS Contemporary Lens (Leica L)
Thank you for your comment. I've never shot with Panasonic and unfortunately don't know the lenses. I can only say that the Sigma 100-400 is a very good and sharp lens and you won't regret buying it. ;-)
Thanks for this video. Sigma makes great lenses!
Yes that’s true. Sigma makes very good lenses.
Can you do a review on the sigma 70-200 vs sigma 100-400
I will try to make a comparison video in the near future. 😉
@@dawa5581 👍🏼. Right now I have the sigma 100-400 but I'm also considering getting the 70-200
@@christianmbabazi9722 a very good choice, but did you already tried the Tamron 28-200mm? I’ve sold my 70-200 Sony lens for this one. I have made also a comparison video about it.
Very helpful video, thank you brother.
Thank you for your comment, you’re welcome 👍
Hola, tengo una canon m50 y estoy en busca de un lente para fotografiar surf, cual de los dos recomiendas considerando que el sensor es aps-c.. Muchas gracias por tu video. Saludos
Y que opinas para grabar? Saludoa y gracias nuevamente!
Gracias por su agradable comentario. Yo recomendaría el Sigma 100-400mm. Con Canon APS-C tiene un recorte de 1,6x y puede acercarse aún más al sujeto. Saludos
Hello, I use an APS-C camera, and I started with a Tamron 70-300, but I would like to take a leap in quality and go for something better, which one would you recommend? I like photography of animals, whether they are birds or others. Which of these two is better? Should I buy something other than any of these?
thank you and very good video
Thank you for your comment 👍 In my point of view for APS-C the Sigma 100-400 is very good. I have also other test-videos on my channel with other Tele lenses on APS-C. Maybe these will help you too in your decision 😉
Can u recommended me which lens do I buy, I am using APS-c not full frame, is the sigma 100-400mm lens on APS-s totally enough taking photos of bird??? And you have a very good comparison!!!
Thank you for your comment. 👍 If your main topic are birds, than I would go with the Sigma 150-600. You will get a better reach and of course also a better bokeh.
I’ve also tested the sigma 100-400 on APS-C on my channel a few times. Maybe these videos will help you too 😉
@@dawa5581 thanks for replying 🙏😊 let me check your reviews!!
@@user-ro4pr9xw2n you’re welcome 😉
Great video , i have been using 100-400 mm sigma for just over 2 years and recently been contemplating getting a 150-600 mm. Is it worth having both ?
@@darshantalawadekar1296 thank you for your comment 👍
I still have both but I use the 100-400 more. To be honest, I’m using the 150-600 only for birds or a little wildlife ones or twice a year.
A menos que uses apsc el 100-400 queda como el 150-600, menos peso más compacto 😎
Así es, cuando lo usas en APS-C no necesitas el 150-600. 😉