📺 It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'TIMELINE' bit.ly/3PvogHo
Vive nôtre Empereur Napoleon Bonaparte et sa Grande Armée. Best Conquerer of Europe and Greatest Strategic Military Genius in History with 56 battles won (rumors say 70 battles won) Yet, still remain the Best General in the World after his death which was 200 years ago He made our country France a Superpower. 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 Tremblez enemis de la France ! Sachant vaincre ou sachant périr ! Un Français doit vivre pour elle ! Pour elle un Français doit mourir ! Vive la France ! 💪🇫🇷🇫🇷🐎👊Victory is ours !
Napoleon is often portrayed as a tyrant that just kept on warring to satisfy his ego but he did try to find settlements with the Austrians and Russians several times and was then betrayed by them. As a self made person his path is far more impressive than any regent born into riches and power.
No that's British propaganda nonsense. Napoleon was fighting for France's right to self-determination. They decided they wanted to be a republic, and the boys' club.of European monarchs decided they didn't want that
Went to Edinburgh Castle in Scotland. If you go inside you can see the actual standards flown by Napoleon that were captured by scottish units of the British army at Waterloo. The actual Flag.
Among the greatest men to ever lived and history’s greatest General , imagine admiring Alexander the Great, Hannibal , Caesar in your childhood , reading about them and then when you’re an adult beign able to say I was better than them. From admiring your heros to surpassing them .
@@adamsnow4979 The same way Lucifer , the greatest of the Angels fell from Heaven, because they forgot that their unique greatness was a gift and responsalibity given only by God , During his lifetime Napoleon was the most powerful man in the world , never before or never again has so much power in one man been seen in history , a SelfMade man from rags to riches purely because of merit and talent . At the end the human nature got the best of him and God grew tired of him and thus his downfall , He achieved in one life what others wouldn’t in 10 lives
@@ernestoA.1999 as great as he was he made many tactical errors like the invasion of Spain and Russia also his legacy wasn’t everlasting. For me the greatest man to ever live was Muhammad a man who started as persecuted street preacher would conquer the entire Arabian peninsula and his disciples would defeat the Sassanid and Byzantine empires and within 100 years after his death the caliphate would stretch from south france to borders of China. If you want to talk about the greatest general then napoleon can have that but not the greatest man
The entire subject of napoleon is complicated. He is controversial but also hypnotically charismatic. He did some stuff wrong but also did a lot right. He has changed the world and cemented himself in the same vain as Alexander and Ceaser. In general, i see him as a truly incredible man. Someone whose legend is legitimately intimidating.
Like all tyrants, he lost and got his comeuppance. There are ultimately two types of revolutions... The American, respecting God and His sovereignity.... And the French godless, and leading unto a worse tyranny than before.
@@spartakos3178lol have u seen the USA We have trans everywhere. What’s down is up what up is down. We have no morals in this country rn. U say our revolution was behind god etc. where is that now? I bet they used god as they did in Britain. A tool for control. They killed they raped etc. the same Europeans came over here. Then what? Ya we all know the history. Also, French godless? Lol Please enlighten me
@@spartakos3178 god has literally been used to start war and ignite hate more than once. We see that in America how a mad man like Trump was able to get elected by conservatives on the basis of Christian values. The bootlicking of the church needs to stop.
Yeah he is a really complex figure. In some ways he was remarkably progressive and forward-thinking for his era, in terms of his legal reforms and advances in civil rights, but he was also a tyrant who imposed his will on France and all of Europe by force.
Good ol' Napoleon entrusted money on his death to the failed assassin of the Duke of Wellington. I love Napoleon but that man definitely knew how to hold a grudge.
@@goldman77700 bulkshit , he was a man of excessive mercy , he forgive many men who bretrayed him , or attempted against his life , he should’ve executed them all , instead he let them go .
@@ernestoA.1999 Except Napoleon really did leave money in his last will specifically to one of Wellington's failed assassins-Officer Cantillon. It's even on NapoleonDotORG. "Napoleon's Last Will and Testament". Look it up yourself I dare you.
@@rickycalais3356 Sure but he was also defending France against half of the Europe, he was not a saint for sure but you can't compare him to washington. USA was nothing during this time compared to what it is now, they had no great power compared to Europe. USA made a lot of small colonial wars after that to conquier what was basically forests and deserts (with peoples slaughtered). Europe had centuries of history and was at a time were you had a lot of ideological changes. France was considered has a threat because of the killing of Louis XVI and the arrival of the Republic. France was threatened way before Napoleon was a Consul or an Emperor.
People either love him or hate him. I see a man who was a great opportunist and understood how the world works. Tell me how he is worst than the institutions run today by men but hide from their bunkers? He fought with his men, gave epic speeches and rewarded his staff and troops greatly. He gave men a reason to live, even if self motivated. When I listen to people (British) who hate him, they sound envious. Yes, he plunder the Church but didn’t kill any clergyman- which is uncommon in war. Historians hide behind the “but the crown was corrupt so the revolution followed.” No bro. Power, wealth will always be corrupt. These people wanted violence for free healthcare, take a hike. Napoleon was no saint. But I rather my country be an empire lead by a patriot than some international court!
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼I AM A FAN OF NAPOLEON! I cannot read any history about Napoleon that is written by an English person or from a British perspective. They always vilify him… and wrongfully so. I guess the saying is true, the victor gets to write history… The churches were being plundered long before Napoleon came along, it was all part of the revolution that was sweeping through France.
but in the end--- he was a loser. A Corsican thug who was lucky the Brits didn t stretch his neck...think of the hundreds even millions of deaths he caused; the millions of $$$ and loss of property... to what end ? who is next to have his crimes white wash ed? should we re-Hab the Mad Hatter Adolf ?? poor mis understood failed artist> with a stupid imitation Chaplin moustache?
This is beautifully said-it comes to the quote, “History is written by the victors.” I am of the opinion that a more authoritative system is often more effective, and Napoleon effecting countless new laws and raising an army larger than any ever seen before only proves that. Corruption always comes about in any system, but it definitely says a lot that Napoleon’s men refused to arrest him when sent against him upon his return from exile. Patriotism gives people an identity and a rally point, what would be a welcome difference from the division down the aisle we see today (here in the U.S. it’s pretty bad at least, but definitely at least somewhat in other countries under republics or parliaments as well).
To be ranked amongst many other mass murdering narcissists. Over half a million died in his Russian campaign alone to absolutely no end. The Spanish campaign was similar. His establisment of the french education system and builing of infrastructure was indeed impressive (to me), but his love of war you can keep.
@@davids4313He brought forward radical reforms in law, which to this day remain the cornerstone of legislative systems across the world, built up the foundations of modern human rights and spat on needless archaic tradition He still lived in savage times and behaved savagely, waging war from the Atlantic to Moscow, but so is history. His feats remain remarkable and his realm would have produced a Pax Francorum if it wasn't for the emperors of Europe who absolutely despised Napoleon, because at the end of the day he wasnt just an enemy warlord: he was an enemy warlord who brought the ancient regimes to its knees and just by breathing, he represented a threat to each and every one of them.
For people who want to read about Bonaparte there is a couple books by David Chandler in English that are out of print but if you can find them they are the best books on Napoleonic ere 👍
@@David-lr4kc Dude, that is a GREAT documentary! If you like the battles look up “Epic History Napoleon” and click any of the battles. That channel made me fall in love with anything Napoleon. Appreciate the suggestion buddy! Going to go watch that again tonight. ✌️
Were they buried at over there wit Nate turner,, Harriet Tubman and Harriet Tubman and the make believe plots cemetery these all sound like drunk people stories to me now.
What’s utterly baffling to me in discussions about Napoleon & whether he’s good or bad is only Napoleon is discussed. There is essentially no insight on his enemies, who they were, & what they were fighting for. How is anyone to determine a reasonable view on the man with only half the story always told?
I don’t think this is the case at all, what about the two Russian Tsars Paul and Alexander, what about Austrian Emperor Francis and his daughter, the wife of Napoleon. Never heard about Metternich? What about his former general Bernadotte who became the King of Sweden. What about King Frederick William III of Prussia or Bavarian King Maximilian I. There are many well known British leaders of that time as well: Admiral Nelson, George III and IV, Wellington, Castlereagh, …
Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte is the greatest commander in history. His biography and battles are truly brilliant. He was a strategic planner and I am one of his biggest fans. I advise everyone to watch this video and read his story.
For those who have seen and remembered Napoleon as a military man,a generale,an emperor,a historical figure,my sympathies are with them.But whoever has read and remembered Napoleon as a Philosopher........... 👍. 🙏.
You can also see the Napoleonic standards in St. Petersburg Russia, at the church our Lady of Kassan. In the church, is a sarcophagus of the Russian general who defeated Napoleon, and took his military standards.
To everyone involved with History Hit’s (including Timeline), THANK YOU!🥰🌻 I can not tell you how wonderful it is to have all these incredible videos. I chose to care for my loved ones over finishing my greater education and find myself living a meager lifestyle. I wouldn’t change a thing, it was the right choice. That is why I am so grateful for the content you create. In the vast sea of useless shows that disintegrate sense, you are my life raft. 💗
@@treyyoungley6171 it was actually care for my grandma. Then back to school and my father needed me then back once more and my other grandmother died. After 3 death’s I am not going back to school for the few credits that print a piece of paper with a stamp. And my stepson’s are grown. I really am just a nerd at heart. I also watch many lectures on archaeology of the first century and earlier, geology, DNA studies and most museums around the world have UA-cam channels too. I am also old. LOL😊But I am sure the stay at home mom thing would have been great
Your education on earth continues day by day as we are all students in life. The best comes from your mind within books, human relations, documentaries, museums, etc no amount of classroom can replace this!
The good thing about yt is that I fell asleep 5 minutes in to the video and it went to ads for what can only have been 25 minutes, I had a 30 min sleep timer. Woke up, checked how far in I was to the video, 5 mins and some gaffot mincing on my phone for 25.
A wonderful video that tells the story of a famous French ruler who achieved many accomplishments during his reign, but many were also killed during his reign
no, you can already see delirium and bastardism. there was in the trailer how Napoleon's troops fired at Egypt, this is complete nonsense. Napoleon was the one who started such a deep research work in Egypt. Also, the cast is incompetent. The roles are wrong. In short, a film for the layman
@DC "Alexnader will prove you wrong". Why? Because he rode a horse over the huts of a buncha primitive tribesmen? LOL Napoleon outmaneuvered the British armies during the peak of the imperial period in increasingly complex but non mechanized warfare from canada to india. Caesar couldn't even conquer the anglo saxons lol.
@DC "ATG never lost" is like a child's metric of measuring a general's greatness while making choo choo noises with action figures. He never lost cause he tucked tail and ran back the moment he saw the first Indian kingdom. You know, the same sub-continent that the British and the French used as their play thing during Napoleon's time.
Calling Alexander GOAT is almost a right of passage for rookies getting into warfare. Napoleon was the pinnacle of strategy at a time of modern warfare with increasingly complex maneuvers (but without benefit of mechanized warfare, so the human element still reigned supreme). Against the might of the Coalition Armies during the peak of European imperialism with the entire modern world as their tabletop. Alexander rode his horse over the huts of a buncha primitive nomadic tribesmen and tucked tail the moment he saw elephants lol. It's like comparing Michael Jordan to your office rec league champ.
Napoleon Bonaparte was a fascinating figure whose life was filled with ambition, strategy, and profound impact on world history. From his rise through the ranks to become Emperor of France, his innovative military tactics, and the sweeping reforms he introduced, Napoleon left an indelible mark that shaped Europe and beyond. A well-made history documentary on him would not only capture the intense battles and alliances but also delve into his vision, leadership style, and even his eventual downfall. A must-watch for anyone interested in understanding the complex layers of one of history’s most influential leaders
Nobody talks about this but Napoleon was very good at math at a time when cannons were fewer as just big guns he instead would figure out the angles and distance and take out the key strengths of his enemy with artillery
5:40 - 6:30. Please don't interrupt a documentary with a "check out our other documentaries". It seriously disrupts the flow for viewers. There is a time and a place for that. The place is in the video description.
historians say that Napoleon avoided touching or even confronting plague patients to avoid infection, and that his visits to the sick were an invention of later Napoleonic propaganda. An example of Napoleon's propaganda in this regard, after a period of the campaign, was the propaganda painting "Bonaparte Visiting the Plague Victims in Jaffa in 1804" by Antoine-Jean Gros. The painting showed Napoleon touching the body of a sick man, as he was depicted as one of the "royal healers". This was no accident, as 1804 was the year Napoleon Bonaparte crowned himself Emperor.
An other version is that he did approched and touched plague patients but because he thought he was unvulnerable. The only thing sure is that historians are unsure about what Napoleon truly did and what were his intention at Jaffa and we will probably never know.
@@Anton-kp3mi He did touched them , As a man of genius he knew that the Plague did not expand so to physical touch . The plague was not countagious due to touch .
Actually it’s not propaganda , Napoleon did visit the sick and even raised one of them , but he knew that the plague wasn’t countagious due to physical touch
@MokA all the privileged aristocrats were just mad a man who came from nothing had destroyed there fantasy bourbon world. He rose based on ability not his blood like many of the snobs who ruled back then. Remember the french revolution kick started democracy !!
His decline started in Spain and Portugal and then his decision to overstay his welcome in Russia. He took 600,000 men to russia and only came back with 90,000.
I always marvel at how matter-of-fact some of the speakers are in some documentaries, sounding as if they were in fact, present during those periods of history, witnessing things first hand lol
"...and there stood Napoleon, making a peanut butter sandwich with his sword, as his wife yelled from the laundry room, 'You have to stop getting blood on your uniforms, Nappy!!!'"
Napoleon was a great and brilliant Italian leader. French by nationality, Italian by blood. He was a student of the Roman Empire and modeled many of his tactics after Julius Caesar.
More like 18th century French military theorists as de Bourcet, du Teil and de Guilbert since Caesar tactics are kinda outdated obviously. He got a fully french military education at the military school at Brienne and then at Paris.
@@TolerantAcceptingModernCommuni There is plenty of data to support this claim. One example is that the average height in the UK increased by 10cm in the 20th century.
@@TolerantAcceptingModernCommuni yes there is lol, the avarage height of a dutch guy in `1810 was 165 cm, the avarage height of the avarage dutch guy now is 185 cm. thats 20 cm in about 200 years.
My 5th Great Grandfather Phillip was lucky enough to be talked to by Napoleon when he was a young boy. His father was in the Commissariat Division of the British Army and they followed Wellington through Spain and Portugal from 1812-14. He got to see the aftermath of the battle at Badajoz, which he described as; "a dreadful sight, men all torn and trampled on, and horses wandering lame and mutilated among the wounded". The encounter happened in Bayonne, when troops were leaving the city and Phillip went to go watch with a German baker. He wrote that a man had pulled up next to them before a wine shop in a "bottle-green frock coat and a cocked hat" and "riding an iron grey horse". Phillip was admiring the trappings of the horse when Napoleon came out and patted him on the head, calling him "Bon Garcon", before he continued onwards.
Sush... Propaganda has slowly rewritten over the decades Napoleon's history and life trying to hide his connection to Italy (as a geographic and cultural territory, not as a political entity that did not yet exist) which, however, remains in old nineteenth-century books that can be consulted in French-language libraries. He had an Italian accent and in the last century it became "Corsican accent" (he spoke in Tuscan dialect with his parents which was the most cultured Italian language in Napoleon's time) He never learned to write well in French but in the last century in every book about Napoleon: "he was fluent in French" His last words before he died were "head of the Army" heard by 4 witnesses but 20 years after his death one of the witnesses added: "France and Josephine" to make it more dramatic and start making him a national myth. Any criticism against Napoleon today is deemed "English propaganda" but the same French historian and intellectual Hippolyte Taine, one of the most representative figures of the European cultural world of the 1800s, wrote: "Napoleon, far more Italian than French, Italian by race, by instinct, imagination, and souvenir, considers in his plan the future of Italy, and, on casting up the final accounts of his reign, we find that the net profit is for Italy and the net loss is for France.“ Taine wrote this in his work "Les Origines de la France Contemporaine," published in 1875-1890. Taine was critical of Napoleon's rule and saw him as more interested in advancing his own personal ambitions and promoting the interests of Italy than in serving the interests of France. This quote reflects Taine's belief that Napoleon had a strong affinity for Italy and that his policies were often motivated by his desire to promote Italian nationalism and culture. (This is why the acculturated French don't love Napoleone Buonaparte...) I personally don’t believe that Napoleon had Italy's interests at heart, ditto France. He was interested in achieving personal glory. Napoleon was a pragmatist, rational, not sentimental about peoples, his main goal was power and his rise to it and France was only the right place for him at the right time. Napoleon was only interested in Napoleon's greatness.
This video assumes a lot. For example, that Napoleon wished for revolution to start because it was the only way he saw how to satisfy his ambition. That's just suppositions. In what way was it possible to predict that revolution would come, or that it wouldn't be crushed, or that it would grow in such a way??? Another thing, it was stated that Napoleon was smitten with Josephine, and yet... almost in the same sentence it was said that because she had connections, it was advantageous for him to marry her; thus almost negating the smitten portion. (By the way, were her connections really that great? Considering that she spent time in prison because she was who she was and had been married to who she'd been married to.) You claim that Napoleon feels entitled to bein treated as an emperor in Italy and even resides in a mention, but because he goes back in a normal uniform he is playing games. And maybe there are evidence to suggest this. But without that evidence this seems only like an opinion. Why not say that he needed to show strength while in foreign lands, and in those days strength was also shown in all the pomp and circumstance; around him there were monarchies everywhere after all. But after he was done, he went back as he really was??? Why assume this ambitious, megalomaniac personality??? I could g on and on, but let's just say, to sum it all up - you assume a lot of his motivations without showing real proof that he was actually this nefarious figure who did nothing but plot his own rise to power. p.s. ANd especially you need to provide proof that Napoleon's brother manipulated the election. Maybe it's just me, but this documentary seems very biased against Napoleon
It's just a documentary video it's not a presentation of all historical proof and research done to come up with it. If you want to go deeper into it you can, but it isn't a college lecture.
“In a world of 1780s in France, which is highly aristocratic. Napoleon is the kind of person who is stewing his own ambition in a society which is deeply hierarchical and isn’t ever gonna let someone like him ascend to greatness.”
Napoleon Bonaparte was of Italian descent. Napoleon's family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family that emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a minor Genoese noble family.
If you're Polish or American, Napoleon was a great guy. Poland emerged after many years of being divided. Jefferson bought a third of the US from France, the Louisiana purchase. France sold the USA indian land, which the USA paid for with a loan from the UK. So France paid for future wars against the UK, with UK money in exchange for land they didn't really own and couldn't afford to garrison. Nappy always had a plan, I think Nay cost him that victory at Waterloo.
Vive nôtre Empereur Napoleon Bonaparte et sa Grande Armée. Best Conquerer of Europe and Greatest Strategic Military Genius in History with 56 battles won (rumors say 70 battles won) Yet, still remain the Best General in the World after his death which was 200 years ago He made our country France a Superpower. 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥 Tremblez enemis de la France ! Sachant vaincre ou sachant périr ! Un Français doit vivre pour elle ! Pour elle un Français doit mourir ! Vive la France ! 💪🇫🇷🇫🇷🐎👊Victory is ours !
Napoleon c 'est aussi des centaines de milliers de gens envoyés a la mort pour rien , des erreurs incroyables , une fin misérable sur un cailloux au milieu de l 'atlantique et au final ,une France completement laminée .
too bad this ends at his rise, it was just getting good! I take issue with saying his hold on power was "short lived". The was emperor for a decade during one of the most turbulent periods in European history...
Crazy life story. Starting from Corsica, being exiled, rising to emperor exiled again to Elba coming back to power only to end up on a miserable island of St Helena. Can't make it up.
my ancestor sent him there and sign is redition...and return all kings of Europe and defeat the ottoman empire ...and no single history on him ...but thry do good docu on loser trying to make us believe he his à heroe
The Austrians were not taken by surprise by the crossing - both sides had spies reporting enemy movements. Melas, who had defeated the French at First Marengo the year before, was already concentrated around Turin and then withdrew part of the siege force from Genoa, before marching east to Alessandria. Marengo is barely a hamlet, let alone a town. He was spread out due to being partly misled by the Piedmontese double agent Carlo Gioelli. Melas was not overconfident in winning - he was wounded, 72 years old and probably suffering from Parkinson’s. He had handed comma to FZM Kaim. The Consular Guard had already been crushed by Austrian cavalry by the time Melas left the field. This has been in the public domain since 2000. Must try harder.
Napoleon is indeed one the great generals of military history and one of my favorites for sure. However, he was completely outmatched at sea by the British Navy under the command of Admiral Horatio Nelson, particularly at the Battle of the Nile (1798) and the Battle of Trafalgar (1805). I believe Nelson was killed in the Trafalgar naval battle. Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812 was not well planned and turned out to be a complete disaster. I believe that he was almost captured by Cossack Horseman (who constantly harassed his baggage train). Napoleon was also defeated by the Allied forces of Austria, Russia, Sweden and Prussia at the Battle of Leipzig (1813). This battle (also called the Battle of the Nations) marked the beginning of the end for Napoleon. The end finally came for Napoleon two years later when Allied commanders of the Seventh Coalition, (one of those commanders being British Army Commander Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington) defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo (1815). This battle, as we know, was a resounding defeat for Napoleon and it resulted in the end of his military campaigns.
@@lvl1_feral_druid - Maybe I didn't word my comment properly. I'll admit that much. But I didn't say that Napoleon actually faced Admiral Nelson. However, Napoleon's Navy was indeed outmatched and defeated at the Nile and at Trafalgar. Those are historical facts. And Waterloo is not overrated. The Allied forces not only outnumbered Napoleon but the Commanders had already became quite familiar with his tactics. At that point in his career, Napoleon had become predictable. And by the way, Wellesley (1st Duke of Wellington) never lost a land battle. I believe he had 32 victories to his credit. That is impressive. And let's also keep in mind that one of the Prussian officers (Chief of Staff) campaigning against Napoleon at Waterloo, was none other than Karl von Clausewitz, author of On War. An absolute masterpiece on virtually every aspect of war.
@@barrybarry-bb28 "However, Napoleon's Navy was indeed outmatched and defeated at the Nile and at Trafalgar" - Oh you are totally right about that, it would not be serious of me to deny it. Interesting facts also, is that Napoléon's orders to relocate the fleet were ignored by admirals at those 2 battles, I sometime think about it, could it have changed history - Waterloo is overrated to me and it overshadows the battle of Leipzig, the one causing the dissolution of the confederation of the Rhine, that is the actual battle that ended the French empire and even if the French had won at Waterloo, the forces were just too strong to win against the seventh coalition. - I did not followed Wellington's military career and what odds he faced, I've heard that he was a defensive general but I can't tell. At Waterloo however, he had the ground advantage, and still, was about to collapse if it wasn't because of Blucher's arrival. Napoléon didn't have the best marshals anymore to fight with and he wasn't at his most formidable health neither. Anyway, we lost and here we are today, forced to talk English with our hideous incompatible french accent, and fighting over fishes.
Rave. Napoleon defeated Russia militarily. It just didn't work politically. Borodino, Smolensk and many other battles were defeated by Napoleon. Also, Napoleon Bonaparte did not manage the fleet during the Egyptian Campaign. And the company of 1814 was lost only because of Tyleran, who surrendered Paris. (On the company in Russia, I refer to the historian Yevgeny Ponasenkov for his monograph on the war of 1812.)
No way. Alexander incorporated foreigners into his army and gave them high positions, married on of them( and had his generals marry them also) and adopted their style of dress. He was so progressive that his more conservative army almost mutinied at the thought of treating barbarians as equals
@@davyroger3773 Read more about Bonaparte..his legal code.scientific .expeditions to Egypt.. his disdain of the church. Alexander's empire didn't last a few weeks after his death. Napoleon legacy lives on in above
📺 It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service and get 50% off using the code 'TIMELINE' bit.ly/3PvogHo
Vive nôtre Empereur Napoleon Bonaparte et sa Grande Armée.
Best Conquerer of Europe and Greatest Strategic Military Genius in History with 56 battles won (rumors say 70 battles won)
Yet, still remain the Best General in the World after his death which was 200 years ago
He made our country France a Superpower.
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
Tremblez enemis de la France !
Sachant vaincre ou sachant périr !
Un Français doit vivre pour elle !
Pour elle un Français doit mourir !
Vive la France ! 💪🇫🇷🇫🇷🐎👊Victory is ours !
What is the background tune around 07:50-8:20
Y⁷Your ⁷
7
Please delete my order
Napoleon is often portrayed as a tyrant that just kept on warring to satisfy his ego but he did try to find settlements with the Austrians and Russians several times and was then betrayed by them.
As a self made person his path is far more impressive than any regent born into riches and power.
The British didn't like anyone else to have a parliamentary monarchy
@@caniblmolstr4503 they're hero Wellington probably grew up with a silver spoon in his mouth.
Winston Churchill was the greatest of them sll
No that's British propaganda nonsense. Napoleon was fighting for France's right to self-determination. They decided they wanted to be a republic, and the boys' club.of European monarchs decided they didn't want that
@@arthurdewith7608 I agree 💯
Went to Edinburgh Castle in Scotland. If you go inside you can see the actual standards flown by Napoleon that were captured by scottish units of the British army at Waterloo. The actual Flag.
That's cute. The French had thousands of standards.
@@TheColombiano89 not anymore. They're now in Edinburgh Castle.
👍
@@matthewh.9544 lmao
Where are you from
Among the greatest men to ever lived and history’s greatest General , imagine admiring Alexander the Great, Hannibal , Caesar in your childhood , reading about them and then when you’re an adult beign able to say I was better than them. From admiring your heros to surpassing them .
How can the greatest man ever die as a loser
@@adamsnow4979 The same way Lucifer , the greatest of the Angels fell from Heaven, because they forgot that their unique greatness was a gift and responsalibity given only by God , During his lifetime Napoleon was the most powerful man in the world , never before or never again has so much power in one man been seen in history , a SelfMade man from rags to riches purely because of merit and talent . At the end the human nature got the best of him and God grew tired of him and thus his downfall , He achieved in one life what others wouldn’t in 10 lives
@@ernestoA.1999 as great as he was he made many tactical errors like the invasion of Spain and Russia also his legacy wasn’t everlasting. For me the greatest man to ever live was Muhammad a man who started as persecuted street preacher would conquer the entire Arabian peninsula and his disciples would defeat the Sassanid and Byzantine empires and within 100 years after his death the caliphate would stretch from south france to borders of China. If you want to talk about the greatest general then napoleon can have that but not the greatest man
@@ernestoA.1999 Napoleon didn’t come from rags. He was born into Corsica nobility.
Impoverished Corsican Nobility , he made himself a General due to Merit and personal ability
The entire subject of napoleon is complicated. He is controversial but also hypnotically charismatic. He did some stuff wrong but also did a lot right. He has changed the world and cemented himself in the same vain as Alexander and Ceaser. In general, i see him as a truly incredible man. Someone whose legend is legitimately intimidating.
Like all tyrants, he lost and got his comeuppance.
There are ultimately two types of revolutions... The American, respecting God and His sovereignity.... And the French godless, and leading unto a worse tyranny than before.
@@spartakos3178lol have u seen the USA
We have trans everywhere. What’s down is up what up is down. We have no morals in this country rn. U say our revolution was behind god etc. where is that now?
I bet they used god as they did in Britain. A tool for control. They killed they raped etc. the same Europeans came over here. Then what? Ya we all know the history.
Also, French godless? Lol
Please enlighten me
@@spartakos3178 god has literally been used to start war and ignite hate more than once. We see that in America how a mad man like Trump was able to get elected by conservatives on the basis of Christian values. The bootlicking of the church needs to stop.
Don't forget Genghis Khan
Yeah he is a really complex figure. In some ways he was remarkably progressive and forward-thinking for his era, in terms of his legal reforms and advances in civil rights, but he was also a tyrant who imposed his will on France and all of Europe by force.
Who’s here after the Napoleon trailer?
Need to be able to pretend I know what's going on when I go see it in theaters 😂
Yup lol
Me too.
Me!
The trailer looked really good. Didn’t think I’d get excited to watched a Napoleon movie.
It's crazy that queen Victoria was only 2 years old when he was still around
"A true man hates no one." -Napoleon Bonaparte
Good ol' Napoleon entrusted money on his death to the failed assassin of the Duke of Wellington. I love Napoleon but that man definitely knew how to hold a grudge.
@@goldman77700 bulkshit , he was a man of excessive mercy , he forgive many men who bretrayed him , or attempted against his life , he should’ve executed them all , instead he let them go .
@@ernestoA.1999 Except Napoleon really did leave money in his last will specifically to one of Wellington's failed assassins-Officer Cantillon. It's even on NapoleonDotORG. "Napoleon's Last Will and Testament". Look it up yourself I dare you.
"I have no enemies" -Napoleon Bonaparte
Did he say that to Toussaint?
Absolutely crazy to think Napoleon and George Washington both rose to power at the same time. Savage days.
I would not in any way use Napoleon and George Washington in the same sentence. Napoleon was always pursuing his own personal glory and power.
@@rickycalais3356 Sure but he was also defending France against half of the Europe, he was not a saint for sure but you can't compare him to washington. USA was nothing during this time compared to what it is now, they had no great power compared to Europe. USA made a lot of small colonial wars after that to conquier what was basically forests and deserts (with peoples slaughtered). Europe had centuries of history and was at a time were you had a lot of ideological changes. France was considered has a threat because of the killing of Louis XVI and the arrival of the Republic. France was threatened way before Napoleon was a Consul or an Emperor.
@@rickycalais3356 I don't really see how that's a completely horrible thing for a commander.
@@rickycalais3356 Napoleon was much greater than George Washington ever was - in every single way.
And one refuse to be made king and the other crowned himself emperor…who was the better man.
People either love him or hate him.
I see a man who was a great opportunist and understood how the world works. Tell me how he is worst than the institutions run today by men but hide from their bunkers?
He fought with his men, gave epic speeches and rewarded his staff and troops greatly. He gave men a reason to live, even if self motivated. When I listen to people (British) who hate him, they sound envious. Yes, he plunder the Church but didn’t kill any clergyman- which is uncommon in war.
Historians hide behind the “but the crown was corrupt so the revolution followed.” No bro. Power, wealth will always be corrupt. These people wanted violence for free healthcare, take a hike. Napoleon was no saint. But I rather my country be an empire lead by a patriot than some international court!
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼I AM A FAN OF NAPOLEON! I cannot read any history about Napoleon that is written by an English person or from a British perspective. They always vilify him… and wrongfully so. I guess the saying is true, the victor gets to write history… The churches were being plundered long before Napoleon came along, it was all part of the revolution that was sweeping through France.
but in the end--- he was a loser. A Corsican thug who was lucky the Brits didn t stretch his neck...think of the hundreds even millions of deaths he caused; the millions of $$$ and loss of property... to what end ? who is next to have his crimes white wash ed? should we re-Hab the Mad Hatter Adolf ?? poor mis understood failed artist> with a stupid imitation Chaplin moustache?
This is beautifully said-it comes to the quote, “History is written by the victors.” I am of the opinion that a more authoritative system is often more effective, and Napoleon effecting countless new laws and raising an army larger than any ever seen before only proves that. Corruption always comes about in any system, but it definitely says a lot that Napoleon’s men refused to arrest him when sent against him upon his return from exile. Patriotism gives people an identity and a rally point, what would be a welcome difference from the division down the aisle we see today (here in the U.S. it’s pretty bad at least, but definitely at least somewhat in other countries under republics or parliaments as well).
Facts. Based comment sir!
I wonder whether Bernard Cornwell “Sharpe” will write any novel on Napoleon from France perspective.
An absolutely fascinating analysis of an historic figure
I'm so happy napoleon is getting the recognition he deserves. Truly a great of man of human history
To be ranked amongst many other mass murdering narcissists. Over half a million died in his Russian campaign alone to absolutely no end. The Spanish campaign was similar. His establisment of the french education system and builing of infrastructure was indeed impressive (to me), but his love of war you can keep.
@@davids4313He brought forward radical reforms in law, which to this day remain the cornerstone of legislative systems across the world, built up the foundations of modern human rights and spat on needless archaic tradition
He still lived in savage times and behaved savagely, waging war from the Atlantic to Moscow, but so is history. His feats remain remarkable and his realm would have produced a Pax Francorum if it wasn't for the emperors of Europe who absolutely despised Napoleon, because at the end of the day he wasnt just an enemy warlord: he was an enemy warlord who brought the ancient regimes to its knees and just by breathing, he represented a threat to each and every one of them.
@@davids4313life has a balance to it. The men who do the greatest good usually have an evil just as great
ya…. not a great legacy
gods disciple
“The generals of Napoleon” episode is really good too.
Very well done.
This beats TV any day.
For people who want to read about Bonaparte there is a couple books by David Chandler in English that are out of print but if you can find them they are the best books on Napoleonic ere 👍
David G. Chandler
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_G._Chandler
The Campaigns of Napoleon is still in print…and available on Kindle.
and whats wrong with reading Napoleon's and his very own diary? i would start there first.
@@Hammerli280 my copy of campaigns is from the 1980s or 90s
I beat everyone at chess!
Timeline is the gift that keeps on giving. First all the incredible WW2 documentaries and now a Napoleon documentary! Keep up the fantastic work!!! ❤
If you want an epic Napoleon documentary watch ‘epic history Napoleon March of the eagles’ then part two ‘downfall’. You will not be disappointed
@@David-lr4kc Dude, that is a GREAT documentary! If you like the battles look up “Epic History Napoleon” and click any of the battles. That channel made me fall in love with anything Napoleon. Appreciate the suggestion buddy! Going to go watch that again tonight. ✌️
Martin wasn't talking about no damn nepolian Bornapart of the great lie fam
Were they buried at over there wit Nate turner,, Harriet Tubman and Harriet Tubman and the make believe plots cemetery these all sound like drunk people stories to me now.
Karen knock it off
What’s utterly baffling to me in discussions about Napoleon & whether he’s good or bad is only Napoleon is discussed. There is essentially no insight on his enemies, who they were, & what they were fighting for.
How is anyone to determine a reasonable view on the man with only half the story always told?
I totally agree!
Napoleon changed the world by erasing the history of so called black ppl globally....that's y u don't hear of his real enemies!!!
as the old saying goes history is written by the victors.
I don’t think this is the case at all, what about the two Russian Tsars Paul and Alexander, what about Austrian Emperor Francis and his daughter, the wife of Napoleon.
Never heard about Metternich?
What about his former general Bernadotte who became the King of Sweden.
What about King Frederick William III of Prussia or Bavarian King Maximilian I.
There are many well known British leaders of that time as well: Admiral Nelson, George III and IV, Wellington, Castlereagh, …
@@CodyMapping NADA QUE VER CON LA VIDA Y LA ÉPOCA DE NAPOLEÓN.
!! YA EMPEZAMOS A SACAR LAS COSAS DE SU SITIO !!
Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte is the greatest commander in history. His biography and battles are truly brilliant. He was a strategic planner and I am one of his biggest fans. I advise everyone to watch this video and read his story.
He started the Russian campaign with 600.000 soldiers and come back with 40.000, you think he was always great?
Thank you so much for uploading this video. It is helping me get through the pandemic!
Where are you from?
For those who have seen and remembered Napoleon as a military man,a generale,an emperor,a historical figure,my sympathies are with them.But whoever has read and remembered Napoleon as a Philosopher........... 👍. 🙏.
Titles?
And he was a mathematician
You can also see the Napoleonic standards in St. Petersburg Russia, at the church our Lady of Kassan. In the church, is a sarcophagus of the Russian general who defeated Napoleon, and took his military standards.
Napoleon Bonaparte is a legand
👍
Based
Racist also
@@zoezoe3301
Racist racist racist...... everyone's racist. So annoying already.
@@zoezoe3301 Yeah seriously. enough already.
To everyone involved with History Hit’s (including Timeline), THANK YOU!🥰🌻
I can not tell you how wonderful it is to have all these incredible videos. I chose to care for my loved ones over finishing my greater education and find myself living a meager lifestyle. I wouldn’t change a thing, it was the right choice. That is why I am so grateful for the content you create. In the vast sea of useless shows that disintegrate sense, you are my life raft. 💗
So well put. The life raft part was hilarious. 😂 But God if it isn't the absolute truth.
Oh yeah I'm sure that's why Kari. Definitely not so you can be a stay at home mom
@@treyyoungley6171 it was actually care for my grandma. Then back to school and my father needed me then back once more and my other grandmother died. After 3 death’s I am not going back to school for the few credits that print a piece of paper with a stamp. And my stepson’s are grown. I really am just a nerd at heart. I also watch many lectures on archaeology of the first century and earlier, geology, DNA studies and most museums around the world have UA-cam channels too. I am also old. LOL😊But I am sure the stay at home mom thing would have been great
♥️
Your education on earth continues day by day as we are all students in life. The best comes from your mind within books, human relations, documentaries, museums, etc no amount of classroom can replace this!
Who’s here after the Napoleon movie?
I should have viewed this video first.
This video masterfully captures Napoleon's incredible journey and his influence on modern history
Why is this video so good- there’s nothing we can do
The good thing about yt is that I fell asleep 5 minutes in to the video and it went to ads for what can only have been 25 minutes, I had a 30 min sleep timer. Woke up, checked how far in I was to the video, 5 mins and some gaffot mincing on my phone for 25.
shouldn't have lost Europe. Imagine him taking over the world. Unimaginable reforms he could've done.
A wonderful video that tells the story of a famous French ruler who achieved many accomplishments during his reign, but many were also killed during his reign
I hope the new Napoleon movie coming out stays true to genuine history
no, you can already see delirium and bastardism. there was in the trailer how Napoleon's troops fired at Egypt, this is complete nonsense. Napoleon was the one who started such a deep research work in Egypt. Also, the cast is incompetent. The roles are wrong. In short, a film for the layman
Superb documentary, well done TimelineChannel and History Hit.
This documentary is 10000 times than the Napoleon movie that came out recently. 👏
" If someday someone makes a movie about my life, I want Joaquin Phoenix to play me"
Napoleon Bonaparte.
Please. A combo I didn't know I needed
"87.33% supposed facts on the Internet are untrue." Napoleon 1828.
his most famous quote Lol
@@tonywilliams7152Rose from the grave just to say that, truly inspiring.
@@SirSaladAss he was an amazing man
I’m enjoying the magnificent artwork accompanying this wonderful documentary.
Please do one on Thomas-Alexandre Dumas and his love-hate relationship with Bonaparte
Greatest general of all time.
Alexander the Great?
@@GIBBO4182 wins vs loses Alexander is behind him
@DC "Alexnader will prove you wrong". Why? Because he rode a horse over the huts of a buncha primitive tribesmen? LOL Napoleon outmaneuvered the British armies during the peak of the imperial period in increasingly complex but non mechanized warfare from canada to india. Caesar couldn't even conquer the anglo saxons lol.
@DC "ATG never lost" is like a child's metric of measuring a general's greatness while making choo choo noises with action figures. He never lost cause he tucked tail and ran back the moment he saw the first Indian kingdom. You know, the same sub-continent that the British and the French used as their play thing during Napoleon's time.
Calling Alexander GOAT is almost a right of passage for rookies getting into warfare. Napoleon was the pinnacle of strategy at a time of modern warfare with increasingly complex maneuvers (but without benefit of mechanized warfare, so the human element still reigned supreme). Against the might of the Coalition Armies during the peak of European imperialism with the entire modern world as their tabletop. Alexander rode his horse over the huts of a buncha primitive nomadic tribesmen and tucked tail the moment he saw elephants lol. It's like comparing Michael Jordan to your office rec league champ.
Napoleon Bonaparte was a fascinating figure whose life was filled with ambition, strategy, and profound impact on world history. From his rise through the ranks to become Emperor of France, his innovative military tactics, and the sweeping reforms he introduced, Napoleon left an indelible mark that shaped Europe and beyond. A well-made history documentary on him would not only capture the intense battles and alliances but also delve into his vision, leadership style, and even his eventual downfall. A must-watch for anyone interested in understanding the complex layers of one of history’s most influential leaders
Nothing beats the 4 part mini series by PBS on Napoleon!
I have that on dvd. Epic!
"Knowing things is very lower class". Wow, not a good prescription for keeping you place in the aristocracy.
I was thinking the same thing
Napoleon was an absolute lad!
Ugh
37:40 mistress were common and weren't some sort of shock for the upper class, this woman is reaching
♥️
Women most affected
@@FazeParticles LOL
Nobody talks about this but Napoleon was very good at math at a time when cannons were fewer as just big guns he instead would figure out the angles and distance and take out the key strengths of his enemy with artillery
5:40 - 6:30. Please don't interrupt a documentary with a "check out our other documentaries". It seriously disrupts the flow for viewers. There is a time and a place for that. The place is in the video description.
historians say that Napoleon avoided touching or even confronting plague patients to avoid infection, and that his visits to the sick were an invention of later Napoleonic propaganda. An example of Napoleon's propaganda in this regard, after a period of the campaign, was the propaganda painting "Bonaparte Visiting the Plague Victims in Jaffa in 1804" by Antoine-Jean Gros. The painting showed Napoleon touching the body of a sick man, as he was depicted as one of the "royal healers". This was no accident, as 1804 was the year Napoleon Bonaparte crowned himself Emperor.
Correct. He was crowned himself Emperor at Notre Dame in 1804.
An other version is that he did approched and touched plague patients but because he thought he was unvulnerable. The only thing sure is that historians are unsure about what Napoleon truly did and what were his intention at Jaffa and we will probably never know.
@@Anton-kp3mi He did touched them , As a man of genius he knew that the Plague did not expand so to physical touch . The plague was not countagious due to touch .
Actually it’s not propaganda , Napoleon did visit the sick and even raised one of them , but he knew that the plague wasn’t countagious due to physical touch
@MokA all the privileged aristocrats were just mad a man who came from nothing had destroyed there fantasy bourbon world. He rose based on ability not his blood like many of the snobs who ruled back then. Remember the french revolution kick started democracy !!
This is a very British take on Napoleon.
nice doc to prepare for Napoleon film 🤓
Not long enough,there's far more to tell about this genius.
From victory to victory till the final defeat but out of the ordinary.
His decline started in Spain and Portugal and then his decision to overstay his welcome in Russia. He took 600,000 men to russia and only came back with 90,000.
@@joshua6207that damn cold weather lol
Could you guys do a comprehensive documentary of the French Revolution. I haven't found a really good one yet.
Revolutions Podcast by Mike Duncan
Check out John Merriman Yale Lectures on Robespierre, the Philosophe ,and Napoleon
@@murasakinomorado7210 the best
Check out Ashe logos channel. He has a great one
I always marvel at how matter-of-fact some of the speakers are in some documentaries, sounding as if they were in fact, present during those periods of history, witnessing things first hand lol
"...and there stood Napoleon, making a peanut butter sandwich with his sword, as his wife yelled from the laundry room, 'You have to stop getting blood on your uniforms, Nappy!!!'"
He was definitely ambitious, I’ll give him that.
He gave it all for our Motherland France even though he was Corsican.
Vive l'Empereur 🟦⬜🟥🇫🇷
@@christophermichaelclarence6003 “he was Corsican by blood , French by education, and Italian in everything else “ Will Durant.
@@ernestoA.1999 Yep I know all of that
@@christophermichaelclarence6003 Italy > France?
♥️
Crazy video. Ending was unexpected - congratulations
19:16 What are the odds that Napoleonic warfare would start the same time as Napoleon's first time in command?
i love Napoleon Bonaparte and his legacy
Napoleon was a great and brilliant Italian leader. French by nationality, Italian by blood. He was a student of the Roman Empire and modeled many of his tactics after Julius Caesar.
More like 18th century French military theorists as de Bourcet, du Teil and de Guilbert since Caesar tactics are kinda outdated obviously. He got a fully french military education at the military school at Brienne and then at Paris.
You could say he made his Roman ancestors proud.
Ridiculous. Don't be jaleous. He loved the French, not the Italians.
Napoleon is one of the greatest men to ever exist
Imagine Hannibal , Napoleon, Alexander the Great, and Attila the Hun going at it all at once with equal levels of weaponry. Just intense !
Napoleon was an absolute lad!. Not long enough,there's far more to tell about this genius..
I fell into a deep slumber an Autoplay brought me here tbh
I love learning more n more about these great men
Great video, even if Professor David Andress' anti-Bonaparte bias is on display.
Can’t help himself, can he?
He's insufferable
Interesting video - don't know why they needed string quartet distracting us in the background through the whole broadcast.
I gotta watch this before the movie comes out
French history presented by Brits. Nothing wrong here.
☠️
Ahahahahahahahahahahahah
We had to because all the French were either dead or POWs
Any actual criticisms of what's on display, just outta curiosity ?
You speak French?
Thanks for waking me up with your ad..
Remember guys Napoleon is definitely average height on his time
@Thoth Al Khem We are absolutely getting taller as a species . Plenty of scientific evidence to support this.
@@adarmus4768 yeah no.
We've got no evidence to make such absolute statements.
@@TolerantAcceptingModernCommuni There is plenty of data to support this claim. One example is that the average height in the UK increased by 10cm in the 20th century.
He was the average height. Calling him short was those damn British Propaganda
@@TolerantAcceptingModernCommuni yes there is lol, the avarage height of a dutch guy in `1810 was 165 cm, the avarage height of the avarage dutch guy now is 185 cm. thats 20 cm in about 200 years.
Very interesting! Thanks for this video.
Great man
Great documentary of Bonaparte, pre Emperor, really well put together.
Vive l'Empereur !!
My 5th Great Grandfather Phillip was lucky enough to be talked to by Napoleon when he was a young boy.
His father was in the Commissariat Division of the British Army and they followed Wellington through Spain and Portugal from 1812-14. He got to see the aftermath of the battle at Badajoz, which he described as; "a dreadful sight, men all torn and trampled on, and horses wandering lame and mutilated among the wounded".
The encounter happened in Bayonne, when troops were leaving the city and Phillip went to go watch with a German baker. He wrote that a man had pulled up next to them before a wine shop in a "bottle-green frock coat and a cocked hat" and "riding an iron grey horse". Phillip was admiring the trappings of the horse when Napoleon came out and patted him on the head, calling him "Bon Garcon", before he continued onwards.
Wow
Super Video!
Bounaparte was his real name. Changed it to sound more French.
Sush...
Propaganda has slowly rewritten over the decades Napoleon's history and life trying to hide his connection to Italy (as a geographic and cultural territory, not as a political entity that did not yet exist) which, however, remains in old nineteenth-century books that can be consulted in French-language libraries.
He had an Italian accent and in the last century it became "Corsican accent" (he spoke in Tuscan dialect with his parents which was the most cultured Italian language in Napoleon's time)
He never learned to write well in French but in the last century in every book about Napoleon: "he was fluent in French"
His last words before he died were "head of the Army" heard by 4 witnesses but 20 years after his death one of the witnesses added: "France and Josephine" to make it more dramatic and start making him a national myth.
Any criticism against Napoleon today is deemed "English propaganda" but the same French historian and intellectual
Hippolyte Taine, one of the most representative figures of the European cultural world of the 1800s, wrote:
"Napoleon, far more Italian than French, Italian by race, by instinct, imagination, and souvenir, considers in his plan the future of Italy, and, on casting up the final accounts of his reign, we find that the net profit is for Italy and the net loss is for France.“
Taine wrote this in his work "Les Origines de la France Contemporaine," published in 1875-1890. Taine was critical of Napoleon's rule and saw him as more interested in advancing his own personal ambitions and promoting the interests of Italy than in serving the interests of France. This quote reflects Taine's belief that Napoleon had a strong affinity for Italy and that his policies were often motivated by his desire to promote Italian nationalism and culture. (This is why the acculturated French don't love Napoleone Buonaparte...)
I personally don’t believe that Napoleon had Italy's interests at heart, ditto France. He was interested in achieving personal glory. Napoleon was a pragmatist, rational, not sentimental about peoples, his main goal was power and his rise to it and France was only the right place for him at the right time.
Napoleon was only interested in Napoleon's greatness.
Definitely here brushing up on the facts before the movie comes out! So excited 🎉
Napoleon Was American 🇺🇸
This video assumes a lot. For example, that Napoleon wished for revolution to start because it was the only way he saw how to satisfy his ambition. That's just suppositions. In what way was it possible to predict that revolution would come, or that it wouldn't be crushed, or that it would grow in such a way???
Another thing, it was stated that Napoleon was smitten with Josephine, and yet... almost in the same sentence it was said that because she had connections, it was advantageous for him to marry her; thus almost negating the smitten portion. (By the way, were her connections really that great? Considering that she spent time in prison because she was who she was and had been married to who she'd been married to.)
You claim that Napoleon feels entitled to bein treated as an emperor in Italy and even resides in a mention, but because he goes back in a normal uniform he is playing games. And maybe there are evidence to suggest this. But without that evidence this seems only like an opinion. Why not say that he needed to show strength while in foreign lands, and in those days strength was also shown in all the pomp and circumstance; around him there were monarchies everywhere after all. But after he was done, he went back as he really was??? Why assume this ambitious, megalomaniac personality???
I could g on and on, but let's just say, to sum it all up - you assume a lot of his motivations without showing real proof that he was actually this nefarious figure who did nothing but plot his own rise to power.
p.s. ANd especially you need to provide proof that Napoleon's brother manipulated the election.
Maybe it's just me, but this documentary seems very biased against Napoleon
It's just a documentary video it's not a presentation of all historical proof and research done to come up with it. If you want to go deeper into it you can, but it isn't a college lecture.
Awesome content man 👍🏾
the British talking about unpleasant occupation of people...that's rich...
That's whataboutism, French empire was massive and oppressive, its that simple.
I can't get enough of the man.
@@Endgame707 lol no he wasn't, italy didn't even exist at this time. he was a french from corsica.
There’s nothing you can do
“In a world of 1780s in France, which is highly aristocratic. Napoleon is the kind of person who is stewing his own ambition in a society which is deeply hierarchical and isn’t ever gonna let someone like him ascend to greatness.”
2am I’m sick in bed .this is perfect
We need a movement like that in the continental US.
lmao someone voted for trump
@@electronicsworkshawp me too. Enjoy your tds.
@@electronicsworkshawp 🤡 sure did how is Biden doing in that last CNN poll? 1% approval look it up
@@electronicsworkshawp vote for whoever you like. The system is corrupt.
@@cornpopwasabaddude4188 THAT is the truth. Democracy is a failed experiment in it's current form.
The greatest general that has ever lived.
Napoleon Was Portuguese 🇵🇹
@@Retro77691 Is that true? Cause I am portuguese lmao
@@Jp19981 alright i admit i was joking 😆 he was French 🇫🇷
Napoleon Bonaparte was of Italian descent.
Napoleon's family was of Italian origin. His paternal ancestors, the Buonapartes, descended from a minor Tuscan noble family that emigrated to Corsica in the 16th century and his maternal ancestors, the Ramolinos, descended from a minor Genoese noble family.
Lol
@@Comprends-ton-Dim Not sure what is funny, but the Idiocracy never disappoints with their 37 IQ follow-up comments. That’s all true.
Who's here after Napoleon passed away?
If the French Revolution taught anything is never disarm yourself
Thank you all for your support!! Love this channel
If you're Polish or American, Napoleon was a great guy. Poland emerged after many years of being divided. Jefferson bought a third of the US from France, the Louisiana purchase. France sold the USA indian land, which the USA paid for with a loan from the UK. So France paid for future wars against the UK, with UK money in exchange for land they didn't really own and couldn't afford to garrison. Nappy always had a plan, I think Nay cost him that victory at Waterloo.
Who's here after watching the movie 🎉
Vive nôtre Empereur Napoleon Bonaparte et sa Grande Armée.
Best Conquerer of Europe and Greatest Strategic Military Genius in History with 56 battles won (rumors say 70 battles won)
Yet, still remain the Best General in the World after his death which was 200 years ago
He made our country France a Superpower.
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜🦅🦅⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
🟦🟦🟦🟦⬜⬜⬜⬜🟥🟥🟥🟥
Tremblez enemis de la France !
Sachant vaincre ou sachant périr !
Un Français doit vivre pour elle !
Pour elle un Français doit mourir !
Vive la France ! 💪🇫🇷🇫🇷🐎👊Victory is ours !
Napoleon c 'est aussi des centaines de milliers de gens envoyés a la mort pour rien , des erreurs incroyables , une fin misérable sur un cailloux au milieu de l 'atlantique et au final ,une France completement laminée .
♥️👍
Yes the greatest french was italian, cool! 😆😆😆
@@frank_zapping Corsica is French since 1768 and he is born in 1769 so no, he is french.
@erwann Hervé Ouais ça fait un peu beauf c'est vrai mais au moins il follow pas Usul 😂
Came here after the movie Napoleon because I was disappointed and wanted to learn the real history behind this man
Thanks to Oversimplified I can now keep up w these documentaries 🤣
True 😂😂
👍
Napoleon was indeed average height for the time.
Napoleon is a great legend
too bad this ends at his rise, it was just getting good!
I take issue with saying his hold on power was "short lived". The was emperor for a decade during one of the most turbulent periods in European history...
Crazy life story. Starting from Corsica, being exiled, rising to emperor exiled again to Elba coming back to power only to end up on a miserable island of St Helena. Can't make it up.
my ancestor sent him there and sign is redition...and return all kings of Europe and defeat the ottoman empire ...and no single history on him ...but thry do good docu on loser trying to make us believe he his à heroe
❤
@@palataledicorcelles I would love to hear more of that story.
even women were not consider as humans under is rule....the woman life dépended 100% on men will
@@doe729 it is all hidden in history cus the cultist are jealous bad People that hide the reality to the large population...
The Austrians were not taken by surprise by the crossing - both sides had spies reporting enemy movements. Melas, who had defeated the French at First Marengo the year before, was already concentrated around Turin and then withdrew part of the siege force from Genoa, before marching east to Alessandria. Marengo is barely a hamlet, let alone a town. He was spread out due to being partly misled by the Piedmontese double agent Carlo Gioelli. Melas was not overconfident in winning - he was wounded, 72 years old and probably suffering from Parkinson’s. He had handed comma to FZM Kaim. The Consular Guard had already been crushed by Austrian cavalry by the time Melas left the field.
This has been in the public domain since 2000. Must try harder.
His greatest foe according to Napoleon was Sir Sydney Smith.
@@junesilvermanb2979 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidney_Smith_(Royal_Navy_officer)
A True Man Hate's No One love that Napoleon quote
Napoleon is indeed one the great generals of military history and one of my favorites for sure. However, he was completely outmatched at sea by the British Navy under the command of Admiral Horatio Nelson, particularly at the Battle of the Nile (1798) and the Battle of Trafalgar (1805). I believe Nelson was killed in the Trafalgar naval battle. Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812 was not well planned and turned out to be a complete disaster. I believe that he was almost captured by Cossack Horseman (who constantly harassed his baggage train). Napoleon was also defeated by the Allied forces of Austria, Russia, Sweden and Prussia at the Battle of Leipzig (1813). This battle (also called the Battle of the Nations) marked the beginning of the end for Napoleon. The end finally came for Napoleon two years later when Allied commanders of the Seventh Coalition, (one of those commanders being British Army Commander Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington) defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Waterloo (1815). This battle, as we know, was a resounding defeat for Napoleon and it resulted in the end of his military campaigns.
Nelson never faced Napoléon
Wellington wasn't near his egal
Waterloo is overrated
@@lvl1_feral_druid - Maybe I didn't word my comment properly. I'll admit that much. But I didn't say that Napoleon actually faced Admiral Nelson. However, Napoleon's Navy was indeed outmatched and defeated at the Nile and at Trafalgar. Those are historical facts. And Waterloo is not overrated. The Allied forces not only outnumbered Napoleon but the Commanders had already became quite familiar with his tactics. At that point in his career, Napoleon had become predictable. And by the way, Wellesley (1st Duke of Wellington) never lost a land battle. I believe he had 32 victories to his credit. That is impressive. And let's also keep in mind that one of the Prussian officers (Chief of Staff) campaigning against Napoleon at Waterloo, was none other than Karl von Clausewitz, author of On War. An absolute masterpiece on virtually every aspect of war.
@@barrybarry-bb28 "However, Napoleon's Navy was indeed outmatched and defeated at the Nile and at Trafalgar"
- Oh you are totally right about that, it would not be serious of me to deny it.
Interesting facts also, is that Napoléon's orders to relocate the fleet were ignored by admirals at those 2 battles, I sometime think about it, could it have changed history
- Waterloo is overrated to me and it overshadows the battle of Leipzig, the one causing the dissolution of the confederation of the Rhine, that is the actual battle that ended the French empire and even if the French had won at Waterloo, the forces were just too strong to win against the seventh coalition.
- I did not followed Wellington's military career and what odds he faced, I've heard that he was a defensive general but I can't tell.
At Waterloo however, he had the ground advantage, and still, was about to collapse if it wasn't because of Blucher's arrival. Napoléon didn't have the best marshals anymore to fight with and he wasn't at his most formidable health neither.
Anyway, we lost and here we are today, forced to talk English with our hideous incompatible french accent, and fighting over fishes.
Rave. Napoleon defeated Russia militarily. It just didn't work politically. Borodino, Smolensk and many other battles were defeated by Napoleon. Also, Napoleon Bonaparte did not manage the fleet during the Egyptian Campaign. And the company of 1814 was lost only because of Tyleran, who surrendered Paris. (On the company in Russia, I refer to the historian Yevgeny Ponasenkov for his monograph on the war of 1812.)
Your Bias is showing filthy Brit! 😉
He wasn't even French, was born in corsica but italian from both sides.
Lucky us he got a French military education otherwise he would have been submitted to those old Austrians generals.
@@lvl1_feral_druid modern Italy existed only from 1861, before that Italy wasnt an united country..
Im a big fan of Linoleum Blownapart.
I’m a big fan of yourmom suckmycart 😂
👍😍
I can only respect him, Napoleon Bonaparte is a great leader
The first truly modern man
@MokA and what of the napolenic code? And scientific experiments in Egypt..
And he treated Josephine fair and square
👍♥️
No way. Alexander incorporated foreigners into his army and gave them high positions, married on of them( and had his generals marry them also) and adopted their style of dress. He was so progressive that his more conservative army almost mutinied at the thought of treating barbarians as equals
@@davyroger3773 Read more about Bonaparte..his legal code.scientific .expeditions to Egypt.. his disdain of the church.
Alexander's empire didn't last a few weeks after his death. Napoleon legacy lives on in above
@@sanjaysharma-jf8fv Alexander’s empire led to hellenisation Greek culture blended into existing cultures.
“Napoleon drinking a glass of water is a quintessential napoleonic move”- every historian