WATCH PARTY: 2024 Players Handbook REVEAL??
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 чер 2024
- OSQ Dice! ► www.awesomedice.com/collectio...
Support the Channel! ► / oneshotquesters
SUBSCRIBE for all the Nat 20 luck ► / @oneshotquesters
📱 FOLLOW OSQ SOCIALS 📱
► beacons.ai/oneshotquesters
► / discord
🎥 EDITORS 🎥
► / @swordplaysorcery
📧 BUSINESS INQUIRY 📧
► business@osqtv.com
One Shot Questers is a comedic channel dedicated to tabletop role-playing games, encompassing a range of titles such as Dungeons and Dragons 5th Edition 2014 & 2024 (DnD 5e), Baldur's Gate 3 (BG3), Pathfinder (PF 1, PF 2), and DC20. Our content covers a variety of TTRPG topics, including news, class or character stereotypes, guides & how to’s on gameplay, rules, tips, tricks, and much more, all presented in a humorous and entertaining video. For a quick taste of our most popular content, check out our short-form videos on platforms like TikTok, UA-cam Shorts, and Instagram Reels. - Розваги
Just to clarify, what they said in this about mixing 2014 and 2024 is that the new rules do not support taking a 2014 subclass and grafting it onto a 2024 class or taking a 2024 subclass and grafting it onto a 2014 class. Nor should you be using 2024 feats for a character designed with 2014 rules.
You can still play a 2014 character alongside a 2024 party or vice versa. You can still play encounters/adventures designed using 2014 rules with your 2024 characters or vice versa. There's just a bit too much friction between the two versions to allow for mixing and matching individual character options across both versions on a single character. So a 2024 fighter cannot use the old Great Weapon Master for example, the class and subclasses are balanced around them using the new 2024 Great Weapon Master.
DND 5.5
Plus, D&D has always kind of just been "here's a framework that you can use however works for you". That's why homebrew and flavor-text are such large parts of it. If you really want to mix and match, you aren't going to die or be arrested. They're just talking about how the system is made to run.
For example, if you use 2024 character creation but a 2014 background, you won't get any ASI even though the rest of the 2024 system is written to account for an ASI from your background, thus you might find yourself with lower stats than someone who uses *only* 2024 rules. If you really don't care and find it funny/narratively-satisfying for your character to fail more often than other characters, then go for it... But that isn't how they made the game. If you want to keep the ASI, just find a background that gives you the bonuses you want and flavor text all of it to suit the story you want to tell with your character. People have been doing it for years, but for some reason they forget about that any time WotC make an announcement about new content.
Love the art on the covers of the book! Venger looks so cool on the DMG!
Sneak attack to knock out a enemy has already been a thing you just declare that the damage is non lethal thatvway if it goes down to 0 then they are not killed but knocked out.
As previously defined, only *weapon* (and unarmed strike) damage could be nonlethal. Sneak Attack dealt the same type of damage as the weapon, but was itself not actually weapon damage and therefore could not be nonlethal.
sneak attack can't be nonlethal RAW, though most DMs would probably let it be anyway
Cunning strike allows you to KO them when they are at full HP
@@phntmthf5505 Not quite - any *melee* attack could be nonlethal, so by RAW that also includes spell attacks.
"Sometimes an attacker wants to incapacitate a foe, rather than deal a killing blow. When an attacker reduces a creature to 0 hit points with a melee attack, the attacker can knock the creature out. The attacker can make this choice the instant the damage is dealt. The creature falls unconscious and is stable."
@@JohnvanCapel Oh, neat. Sneak attack’s still not an attack in itself, tho
My favorite name for this edition is 5E revised, otherwise known as FIVER
(not my idea, saw it on Reddit but think it's fun)
We need a tldr video for this
The big take away from this im getting is that 2024 ruleset will not be actively considering interactions with the 2014 ruleset moving forward so those looking to blend things based on the 2014 ruleset into 2024 ruleset will have to adjudicate things for their own table on a case by case basis
Starting at first or third level (or higher) depends on the experience of the party, as a suggestion. Lower levels gives players more time to learn how their character and the game works instead of dumping more abilities or maybe enemies with more abilities on them right away.
I'm calling it re: 5e
It makes sense.
You can drive your older 2014 Nissan on the new 2024 roads and go 65 mph down the highway. Or you can drive the new 2024 Nissan down the 2024 roads. They are compatible.
But it would be less fun to drive your 2024 Nissan down the old 2014 roads at 35 mph and hit all the potholes and traffic lights.
Basically, that old route 66 is drivable with both cars, and Lightning McQueen might find some new friends, but he is made for that new highway and the highway is made for everybody.
if its gonna be that incompatible.. they should just call it D&D 6e instead of insisting its 5e new
Thanks for the Live stream.
👍👍👍👍😎😎😎😎
Truly wild
Well I just recently purchased all three 2014 core rule books but it seems redundant now?
I’m new to this game and can someone clarify or simply what this means please.
I have no idea what will happen in regards to having to buy these new books, or if they'll just remove and replace them, however, what I do know is you still have time before this edition rolls out so, you still have a decent time before those books come out
This new edition isn't out for a few more months and even then it will take (I assume) a few years before the majority of players transfer over. It might have a short uptake of people trying it and then going back to 2014 5e.
unfortunately you bought them at a bad time but you can continue to use them.
I want to leanr about a revised mystic class.
You’re in Texas? Cheers from Dallas.
I'm just a bit worried that all the 3rd party stuff (Humblewood, Dark Matter, Floral Dragons, Ryoko's Guide, Dalriada, etc) that I got to expand 5e will be incompatible when it comes to subclasses. This is where the "you can play 2014 characters with the 2024 rules" helps, but how off will it be?
Glad to hear they buffed abberarent mind sorcerer, really the sorcerer subclass that needed the most attention out of all the others ☺☺☺☺☺☺
Thank you for covering the D&D announcement whilst Nintendo had their Direct ❤
so I do homebrew, it's been my most enjoyable way to explore the realms of TTRPG's to their fullest. 40 years now, i was thinking, would players and GM enjoy a system that isn't built around the rules, more maps, places, things lots and lots of things, but all built to be dropped into any rule system, you build the characters kinda things and decide the rules you want to use for those characters and then they can take those characters into a place that is open to almost any style of play. do you think it would work, you talked about putting your throwing it back Pally and AddBarian to a system, they would work in my world
Correct me if I'm wrong, but with all the beginner text added, graphic design changes, Greyhawk added and bunch of pictures added, isn't the amount of text content actually shorter than 5E books?
What makes you think that? We don’t have the book
I preordered all the books like if you did to
Do we know if the new player's handbook is going to replace the old one in dndbeyond? I feel like they would just get rid of it to make room for the new one but idk
Hope they give cats night vision
Omg yes please. I've had to hombrew this for YEARS!
Does this put the PHB, Xanders, and Tashsas all together or those stay separate. And this add more to base PHB.
Nvm. They said it.
Why is Chris Perkins there? He says maybe 20 sentences…
He the face
@@ruick78 His DMing for Acquisitions Incorporated is a thing of beauty.
@@ruick78No more the face than Jeremy. Jeremy’s just all wound up and Chris is letting him run with it.
Oh and I absolutely hate Bastion. Why was it needed to be part of core rules?
Just felt like I should note for those claiming that this looks like "D&D Baldur's Gate Edition";
Mike Mearls made those parts of BG3 happen, not the leftovers.
That announcement felt like a video game light dive into features, just an airplane overhead view of something with almost no actual info. Good job in trying to make that engaging.
NGL. Fey Step looks kinda crap. Warlocks are squishy and bampfing around the battlefield isn't going to matter in terms of strategy.
You'd be far better off taking Spell Sniper feat and staying in cover away from the bbeg. Even if this ability is a bonus action, 30 ft isn't going to stop a Raging Barbarian from clobbering you.
I invested a decent amount of effort into figuring this out because I wanted to offer it to a new player and playtest it. I have a 50+ hr workweek and thought it'd be exciting. I hope they've got something better in mind.
Before you at me: I've put this together because I'm running Candlekeep Mysteries and there's an Archfey boss. The ability is named "Fey Step." They mention "moving around on the battlefield" in the video. Also, if I'm not mistaken, it's the same team who worked on Candlekeep.
is he wearing a yamaka or is his hair just looking weird?
Have they mentioned anything about how DNDBeyond is going to react to the new changes? Am I going to log in one day to find all my 5e characters ported to 6e? Will there be a toggle in character creation to make a character 5e vs 6e?
Well it will probably be in the character sheet you can pick between X class 2014 and X class 2024 as separate class options as an example. Though only if you own that older content like how they did when they updated race options
They released the subclass list on X and they are cutting out a huge amount of stuff.
I mean we have known this for ages, ever since during UA they announced all classes would only get 4 Subclasses. Cleric and wizard hopefully their cut Subclasses updated at somepoint.
Reading the comments in both the video and Twitch chat just made me realize, you lot can complain about literally anything 🤣
No one likes you.
I'm sticking with Pathfinder because I can't stand WotC, but I hope this ends up being an upgrade for everyone playing DnD
I've heard good things about it, I've been playing 5e but might start with pathfinder also.
The PHB preview makes me want DC20 more. This really did a disservice to D&D
How is it a disservice this the new phb sounds cool
DC20 LETS GOOOO
@@kjmudkipzofthemudkipdynast2657 They said so many words that meant almost nothing. Then ended the stream saying come back tomorrow (and every day after) for the things we should have said today. All we got today was very pretty art and promise of future hype.
@@SacredGrunty they will be updating us all week with smaller videos rather than a broad overview this interview kinda serves as a teaser
Personally this live stream has me interested and the other stuff they may have changed and what new things are in there
@@kjmudkipzofthemudkipdynast2657 Fair enough. I’m not telling you not to like it. I still feel like they did not sell D&D 2024 very well
anyone with a half a brain will want to use the 2024 content.. if a a rule, fea, spell, sublcass etc has been REWRITTEN use the NEW RULES, otherwise you cna sue any old subclass that hasnt bene rewritten with the new classe,s and SURE! you cna play an old class, but why would you given the choice?.. COMPATIBLE does nto mean balanced.. the new rules ar ejsut bette,r they offer better balance, rules clarifications and quality of life improvements...its your choice but poeple need to use their heads.. you can drive an old car or a new car, and they BOTH run on GASOLINE but YOU WANT THE NEW CAR... duh :D