And he's completely right about it! But those arrogant idiots he complains about will be gone from their posts in 3 months. And with them their "green" laws and regulations.
Mr O should NOT make too much noise. He chose to go with an all boeing fleet so he has to deal with the associated risks thereof. Its like an investor on the stock market constantly moaning and complaining about bad investments. There are risks and rewards and you have to deal with consequences. Observations from South Africa
O'Leary is correct in his appraisal of Boeing, Boeing cut corners and to hell with safety and killed 346 people. MCAS was a "surprsie". Obvious WN did the same. Fleet commonaltiy is not logical...?
I just wanted to say the same, but you said it for me. If he thinks he can get the same amount of money on "other markets" then he shall go there, most probably other airlines will be capable of replacing him. It's not like he's delivering his services for free, ot that he's irreplaceable...
There is never anything "huge" on DJ's "Huge update" videos... Never. Just exaggerating to get views and that is the reason why this was the first video I watched from him in more than 4 months
It doesn't but then don't ask why there is no competition in Germany and why the prices for tickets are so high. But who know, maybe this is what the government wants ?
@@r0dani3lb Please explain why lower gate fees would increases competition. All airlines pay the same. There is no cost reduction number that would magically make a flight more profitable for one airline and not the other. If at all, Ryanair with it's pure 737 fleet should be only profitable airline that can fly to German airports, if the fees are SO HIGH.
@@Psi-Storm I am not sure what fees is Ryanair talking about but I am sure of one thing, the airports they are leaving from will have lower competition. A company doesn't leave a route or an airport unless it's not profitable anymore (or not profitable enough). Ask Ryanair for the tehnical reasons, I am just stating what's going to happen based on the events which are occuring.
Ryanair cuts flights to and from Germany. The reason is not high prices in Germany, London, Paris and Amsterdam are more expensive than Frankfurt, bur unavailability of aircraft and crew. The aircraft availability one squarely point to Boeing as cause, but crew availability is RyanairÐs own fault. They were to eager to fire to cut costs in covid times and have not been able to hire all of them back, or replace them.
I would have been considerably cheaper to have done the job properly in the first place. Now Boeing’s name is mud and suffering everywhere. This is what you call an own goal.
The FAA allowed Boeing to operate rogue. This is one example of a marriage between companies and government, a bad marriage and the debacle with Boeing is the result. FAA is doing damage control they are culpable also.
Boeing’s inability to certify the MAX7, MAX10, and 777X 3-4 years after each of them were all supposed to enter service is both frustrating and deserved. As an aviation enthusiast I view this as Boeing paying its dues for negligence, but also I was really looking forward to these planes entering service and now I doubt that they’ll ever enter service at all.
And this lesson (especially its outcome/effects) shall be remembered by the next generation of beancounters, to PROPERLY compute the price of failure at some decisions... Some effects/costs are not immediate and hard to compute, but still are immense...
The FAA has oversight over Boeing planes. The FAA said the max was safe. I doubt one FAA person was fired or jailed for lying. The FAA had 1 job and they failed.
@@PInk77W1 The problem was that the FAA outsourced their oversight duty to the very people they should have been overseeing, i.e. Boeing. What the hell do you expect when you put the foxes in charge of the henhouse?
Although I fly on Boeing airplanes, including the Max, as well as Airbus, I’ve never seen a company cock up its reputation the way Boeing has. They still make great products, almost in spite of themselves.
"I’ve never seen a company cock up its reputation the way Boeing has. They still make great products... " I could say exactly the same about The British Leyland motor-car company. The Montego I owned in 1986 was a good product - just dreadfully put together - with some faults still in place after I'd been driving it for two years. Boeing take note. Your future existence is not guaranteed.
Our regional airport had consultations with Ryanair a long time ago. In the end Ryanair was told what they intended was not sustainable for the airport. One of the very few regional airports which never had a presence from Ryanair. Asking someone from the airport they said that in hindsight they were lucky not to have given taxpayer money to Ryanair, as airport expenses would have been far higher than what Ryanair would have paid.
It's streamlining. Most budget carriers do that. EasyJet only use Airbus. Norwegian and Southwest Airlines also only use Boeing 737s. Until a few years ago, the 737 had a stellar reputation and most 737 in service perform reliably and efficiently for their model. O'Leary is more outspoken, but his views are actually fairly common. Don't kid yourself. Other airlines are just as willing to play hardball, it's just that RyanAir has more clout due to its size.
Yesterday I was talking with my family in Germany and they asked if I would fly Ryanair to get there.... Obviously, I won't. Then, they were commenting on how this summer due to the computer bug they were forced to cancel a Ryanair flight and fly German Wings (Myself, I never flew German Wings) and they stated "well, if Ryanair quits Germany but German Wings get their place, we won't mind. They are so much better." That says it all. Oh! By the way, before someone accuses us of nationalism and all that, none of us is German.
He is absolutely RIGHT about that! The Green ideologists in the German (still) government are trying everything to hinder air traffic. But they will soon be gone and the new government will pursue a completely different policy. O'Leary just needs a little patience.
The aircraft industry is having its issues, these substantial problems with Boeing and the big problem with the Pratt and Whitney engines used on the Airbus 320 series. There are many airlines around the world with aircraft without engines for more than a year while P&W address the problem. In my small country , New Zealand, AirNZ have 10 aircraft out of service.
1:20 How can anyone have the gall to call the Boeing / FAA relationship healthy? By that standard, I guess slave ovners and slaves have a healthy relationship.
Not only the airline needs to earn money the Germany Government also needs to collect money to pay there salaries for the people working on the airports in order to allow that the airline can operate from those airports
It is up to governments to decide what are fair taxes for everyone, not for companies to decide what is fair based on how much money can be paid out to shareholders.
Ryanair is not comited to countries, airports, own workers or any of their clients. Its all about manipulacion, dark rules and making profits. So nothing new is being said.
O'Leary once said in an interview on Irish television that anyone who bought a holiday home on the basis that Ryanair flew to the local airport was, in his own words, 'extremely stupid'.
Yeah Ryanair, the company that That lied saying it flew into frankfurt when it really flew into Hahn Which is not even in the same county as frankfurt, Needs to shut up about germany.
Pretty good all round, faa is stepping up, Boeing is being forced to build safe aircraft, Germany is cracking down on aviation in general forcing people to think twice before stepping on a plane. I'll never, ever, get on a Ryanair plane. People need to vote with their choices.
The Max 8 and Max 9 were certified before the MCAS incident. Now, the FAA is being extra cautious about certifying additional jets from Boeing. Having similar jets just means the certification process is easier than a clean sheet design
Ryanair is in a pickle. They need those aircraft being made and certified by EASA which I doubt will happen anytime soon whatever happens with the FAA.
Boeing is in trouble because CEO had one task- Keep share price UP. He was not tasked with keeping the PLANES UP. Never mind, next year when Elon Musk closes down the FAA as "a waste of money that interferes with business" Boeing won't have to bother with silly things like flight controls that crash planes or doors that fall off.
Every downturn will have an upturn, when a company leaves a market, another company will fill its place. If There is still a demand. other companies will get their chance.
For work, I did 9 different flights this fall in Europe ( US citizen). All tickets were Priority type, with seats in row 2 or 3, one large suitcase checked in, 1 overhead bin bag and personal item. Almost all had priority check in, priority security and priority boarding. The most expensive one was the Munich-Torino (one way) that cost me 400% more than any other ticket, because it was with Lufthansa, not a budget airline. No budget airlines options at MUC for my flight.
Taxpayers paying the airport bills is Ryanair's business model. Those airports which accepted it hoped that Ryanair would attract more customers and especially airlines. But I don't know a single case where this worked out. However, the raised costs at airports in Germany are true, even LH cut down regional connections lately.
O'Leary might be controversial, but he's usually spot-on in his observations. Germany is in rapid and drastic decline. Over the last twenty years, the succeeding German governments have been making own goal after own goal. German industry is in rapid decline. The German medical system is in rapid decline. German carmakers are in rapid decline. German engineering is in rapid decline. Now, German tourism is on the verge of the same. O'Leary has been the most outspoken, but his views are not unique. I divide my time between Germany, the UK and the US. I make a point of avoiding German airports because they're more expensive to use and their product quality is appalling. Comparing Copenhagen and Berlin is like comparing night and day. Copenhagen is efficient, user-friendly and competitively priced. Berlin is a sh*tshow. Hamburg is just as bad, but even more expensive. Germany is going to have to learn the hard way that it is not special. Airlines in general, not just Ryanair, are cutting back. The problem is that Germany is so arrogant, so fundamentally incapable of admitting that they're wrong about anything, that they're going to keep running themselves into the ground until it's too late. I'm sure I'll get angry responses from Germans which miss the point completely.
RYAN Air is a Tax-avoiding stinker and became thrown out of Denmark by our Trade Unions, wanting decent pay for its employees. They wanted to just pay low Irish Wages in an upcoming Hub in Cph. I think as a First they became convinced that they had to pay a Salary for getting work done! They still fly from Cph. but now from ordinary conditions, as any other Company!
@@JohnJones-k9d A lot of Airlines operate from Cph. without going bust. We still have Airbus 380 landing also! I flew to Egypt one time, changing in Frankfurt from I think Lufthansa, and the treatment on the three legs, till I changed to SAS when going home, were considerably better than the last. So it is more likely a fault of SAS, which hasn't been able to attract High Paying Customers, wanting to pay ½ a year's salary for me, to fly First or Business Class!
That's why SAS opened a second division in order to pay lower Irish wages and benefit from Ireland's weaker worker protection laws! Absolutely hilarious comment!
@@Bunnyroo7 Of course! Don't expect a Scandinavian Company to behave any better than most, if not kept in line by Strong Unions! If The Irish started working in their own interests, they could also obtain decent work conditions by forming Unions, but with a Government trying to attract Companies through low taxes and - low wages, they are a little lost for now. Ryan Air learned, I think as a First, the "Hard Way" how to behave in Scandinavia, but it took many years and many hard fights for the workers in Scandinavia to come that far! We are standing on the shoulders of those! And we are only indirectly able to inspire other countries to do the same!
You are actively promoting layziness and incompetence in Scandinavia. Denmark and Norway not so much, but Sweden is. I have a personal experience working for SAS, and while some people worked hard(the one with knowledge), some, and system allows it, did nothing or a bare minimum, and we all got almost equally paid. There is no punishment for fuckups, no fear for work at all. Benefits for workers are ok, until it is a systematic misuse of a system.
My prediction is costs will reduce, if the Chinese can certify their airplane for the EU. Budget companies like Ryanair would definitely not worry about the aircraft coming from someone who is not Airbus or Boeing. And Ryanair customers might say their concerned about it being Chinese but then still fly on it.
Ryanair is heavily hit with Boeing's inability to fulfill their orders, anyway. Besides, they are not the only low cost carrier around, who, BTW, cannot rely indefinitely on governments subsidizing second-tier airports.
Great job, I enjoy your Boeing updates, they have to find a way to get along with O’Leary and Tim Clarke. They must get things right with the 777X and get it together quickly or the 797 is doomed.
Ryanair as stated would love to invest in the German market but in my opnion Lufthansa has done a sterling job of undermining Ryanair over the years. Many Germans would not contemplate using Ryanair as a result of the negative propaganda spread by Lufthansa. Harsh yes and stupid yes but that is the reality of the current situation.
The little Elf with the over-sized mouth has never bought aircraft from AIRBUS because they wouldn't sell their aircraft to him at the price he wanted to pay, so he bought from Boeing as they build aircraft down to the price airlines wanted to pay.........like the shoddy tailor, "never mind with the lack of the material's quality, feel the width you are getting".
Isn't there a concept called price elasticity? If you charge too much for your landing slot, you will lose revenue, perhaps equivalent to what the price hike was supposed to generate per use. Result zero net growth. Mr. Greedy strikes again😢😮
This isn’t about landing slots, I think they are negotiated in the beginning, and are fixed with incremental increases over the years . This is more about the passenger movement charge, which would cover things like security screening , and perhaps ground handling like baggage handling.
Mr O is complaining, because Berlin cuts subsidies for tourism and infrastructure related. So small airports, linked to small counties, are increasing airport fares to cover the balance sheet
Boeing needs to have its all of its upper leadership replaced! Its the Leadership culture that broke Boeing, All of them need to go. And we need Employee elected Board members of 25% of the board. Chosen from inside the Company. They need to be honest and come out with a statement. That the era of Stock buybacks is over. And Investors should be prepared to not receive any dividends for the next 5 years, but it will help make it more profitable in the future.
Since the FAA used the Max 7 to recertification of Max back into service after grounding it makes no sense that it is not yet certified! And how is the FAA going to work with certification of AB in the future 🤔
If it were me I'd have nationalized Boeing and got proper management going, fix the company from the ground up, made sure corners stopped being cut and retained a controlling stake to make profit for US citizens. At this point you can't rely on the company to fix itself. And to be clear, Boeing does a lot with national defence so it makes sense to just step in and say enough is enough. Handing them any money is too risky.
Anyone else disturbed by the B roll of the workers at Boeing (or subcontractor) wearing Hawaiian shirts etc… no standards, over weight slobs and generally unprofessional looking?
Boeing delays stem from their own internal problems, Airbus delays stem from supply chain issues and the fact there are 3000x more A320 family members ordered than 737 Max's
literlay saying put taxpayer money to use to push boeing in the right direction - money well spend? i dont think so in my opinion - it sends the signal if i fail hard enough the gouverment is dicking me out with taxpayer money
The US taxpayer should be buying Boeing, not bailing them out. The company needs to be put under conservatorship to clean up corruption and greed just like we did with GM fifteen years ago.
Let’s not forget that the a320 had 4 fatal accidents in its first 5 years of operation. This is worse than the max, but you guys seem to forget that as you trash Boeing and the max.
Well we all know the reason was MCAS, and a lack of proper pilot training on how to use it. So what was Airbus’ fatal flaw on the A320 when it was released, then?? 🤔🤔
The US taxpayer should be buying Boeing, not bailing them out. The company needs to be put under conservatorship to clean up corruption and greed just like we did with GM fifteen years ago.
O‘Leary accuses others of arrogance. LMAO
Exactly, I laughed my ass out when I heard that one! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
And he's completely right about it!
But those arrogant idiots he complains about will be gone from their posts in 3 months. And with them their "green" laws and regulations.
He has a right to be arrogant, he grew Ryan air from 2 planes to what it is today.
Mr O should NOT make too much noise. He chose to go with an all boeing fleet so he has to deal with the associated risks thereof. Its like an investor on the stock market constantly moaning and complaining about bad investments. There are risks and rewards and you have to deal with consequences.
Observations from South Africa
O'Leary is correct in his appraisal of Boeing, Boeing cut corners and to hell with safety and killed 346 people. MCAS was a "surprsie". Obvious WN did the same. Fleet commonaltiy is not logical...?
I just wanted to say the same, but you said it for me.
If he thinks he can get the same amount of money on "other markets" then he shall go there, most probably other airlines will be capable of replacing him. It's not like he's delivering his services for free, ot that he's irreplaceable...
Makes no difference on aircraft type if the country (Germany) charges tax on those landing their planes in that country. The don’t tax by type!
He has no choice, since he tried to use Airbus to get a better price from Boeing. Airbus will now never sell to O'Leary.
@@FrewstonBooksairbus has no reason not to sell to him.
If he decides to buy Airbus, Airbus will sell him planes, just not at a discount. 😅
There is nothing "HUGE" about the Boeing update.
another pop corn story..oh well
There is never anything "huge" on DJ's "Huge update" videos... Never. Just exaggerating to get views and that is the reason why this was the first video I watched from him in more than 4 months
been having a rough week and the statement "Ryanair is angry" made me laugh way too hard. Thanks for unintentionally making my day
Why does Germany need to reduce taxes in order to boost Ryanair's profits?
It doesn't but then don't ask why there is no competition in Germany and why the prices for tickets are so high. But who know, maybe this is what the government wants ?
Because Michael O'leary is the greediest CEO in the business.
@@marcom2248 Nah, that goes to Boeing's CEO... Ryanair will do anything, but never to compromise safety.
@@r0dani3lb Please explain why lower gate fees would increases competition. All airlines pay the same. There is no cost reduction number that would magically make a flight more profitable for one airline and not the other. If at all, Ryanair with it's pure 737 fleet should be only profitable airline that can fly to German airports, if the fees are SO HIGH.
@@Psi-Storm I am not sure what fees is Ryanair talking about but I am sure of one thing, the airports they are leaving from will have lower competition. A company doesn't leave a route or an airport unless it's not profitable anymore (or not profitable enough). Ask Ryanair for the tehnical reasons, I am just stating what's going to happen based on the events which are occuring.
O'Leary complaining is like someone farting loudly in public
Ryanair cuts flights to and from Germany. The reason is not high prices in Germany, London, Paris and Amsterdam are more expensive than Frankfurt, bur unavailability of aircraft and crew. The aircraft availability one squarely point to Boeing as cause, but crew availability is RyanairÐs own fault. They were to eager to fire to cut costs in covid times and have not been able to hire all of them back, or replace them.
I would have been considerably cheaper to have done the job properly in the first place. Now Boeing’s name is mud and suffering everywhere. This is what you call an own goal.
The FAA allowed Boeing to operate rogue. This is one example of a marriage between companies and government, a bad marriage and the debacle with Boeing is the result. FAA is doing damage control they are culpable also.
Friends in D.C.
I'm happy that I have never flown Ryanair.
The FAA has to do what the government tells them.
Politics and business, Corporate America is just another model of oligarchy.
Boeing’s inability to certify the MAX7, MAX10, and 777X 3-4 years after each of them were all supposed to enter service is both frustrating and deserved. As an aviation enthusiast I view this as Boeing paying its dues for negligence, but also I was really looking forward to these planes entering service and now I doubt that they’ll ever enter service at all.
And this lesson (especially its outcome/effects) shall be remembered by the next generation of beancounters, to PROPERLY compute the price of failure at some decisions... Some effects/costs are not immediate and hard to compute, but still are immense...
The FAA has oversight over Boeing planes. The FAA said the max was safe.
I doubt one FAA person was fired or jailed for lying.
The FAA had 1 job and they failed.
777x and 737-10 too important to ditch. 737-7 though might be axed though.
@ I thought SWA
Ordered 200 max 7 ?
@@PInk77W1 The problem was that the FAA outsourced their oversight duty to the very people they should have been overseeing, i.e. Boeing. What the hell do you expect when you put the foxes in charge of the henhouse?
Although I fly on Boeing airplanes, including the Max, as well as Airbus, I’ve never seen a company cock up its reputation the way Boeing has. They still make great products, almost in spite of themselves.
And the FAA lied and said the max was safe.
Not one person in the FAA got any blame.
"I’ve never seen a company cock up its reputation the way Boeing has. They still make great products... "
I could say exactly the same about The British Leyland motor-car company. The Montego I owned in 1986 was a good product - just dreadfully put together - with some faults still in place after I'd been driving it for two years. Boeing take note. Your future existence is not guaranteed.
Boeing
Seattle
Woke
Go
Broke
What do Ryanair expect when they committed to 100% 737s? And why are they always complaining about fees when their competitors all pay the same?
Our regional airport had consultations with Ryanair a long time ago. In the end Ryanair was told what they intended was not sustainable for the airport.
One of the very few regional airports which never had a presence from Ryanair.
Asking someone from the airport they said that in hindsight they were lucky not to have given taxpayer money to Ryanair, as airport expenses would have been far higher than what Ryanair would have paid.
It's streamlining. Most budget carriers do that. EasyJet only use Airbus. Norwegian and Southwest Airlines also only use Boeing 737s. Until a few years ago, the 737 had a stellar reputation and most 737 in service perform reliably and efficiently for their model. O'Leary is more outspoken, but his views are actually fairly common. Don't kid yourself. Other airlines are just as willing to play hardball, it's just that RyanAir has more clout due to its size.
Yesterday I was talking with my family in Germany and they asked if I would fly Ryanair to get there.... Obviously, I won't.
Then, they were commenting on how this summer due to the computer bug they were forced to cancel a Ryanair flight and fly German Wings (Myself, I never flew German Wings) and they stated "well, if Ryanair quits Germany but German Wings get their place, we won't mind. They are so much better."
That says it all.
Oh! By the way, before someone accuses us of nationalism and all that, none of us is German.
As long as they don’t fly into a mountain.
@albedo0point39 do you always like your own comments?
Why would they do that. That's stupid.
I would never fly on a Boeing, and I would never fly with Ryanair, even if they flew Airbuses.
Ryanair bullying countries again.
He is absolutely RIGHT about that!
The Green ideologists in the German (still) government are trying everything to hinder air traffic. But they will soon be gone and the new government will pursue a completely different policy. O'Leary just needs a little patience.
The aircraft industry is having its issues, these substantial problems with Boeing and the big problem with the Pratt and Whitney engines used on the Airbus 320 series. There are many airlines around the world with aircraft without engines for more than a year while P&W address the problem. In my small country , New Zealand, AirNZ have 10 aircraft out of service.
1:20 How can anyone have the gall to call the Boeing / FAA relationship healthy?
By that standard, I guess slave ovners and slaves have a healthy relationship.
Not only the airline needs to earn money the Germany Government also needs to collect money to pay there salaries for the people working on the airports in order to allow that the airline can operate from those airports
It is up to governments to decide what are fair taxes for everyone, not for companies to decide what is fair based on how much money can be paid out to shareholders.
O'Leary is simply the LCC version of Al-Bakr
"Streamlining" the certification process is the last thing that should be done with Boeing.
No worries. Boeing already have the rubber stamps ready 🤣
Ryanair is not comited to countries, airports, own workers or any of their clients. Its all about manipulacion, dark rules and making profits. So nothing new is being said.
O'Leary once said in an interview on Irish television that anyone who bought a holiday home on the basis that Ryanair flew to the local airport was, in his own words, 'extremely stupid'.
Yeah Ryanair, the company that That lied saying it flew into frankfurt when it really flew into Hahn Which is not even in the same county as frankfurt, Needs to shut up about germany.
WN has the same MO
I think that's mainly the airport's fault though, they call it "Frankfurt-Hahn Airport"
Well that isn’t too bad by Ryanair standards. It is in the same country. They did market flights to “Copenhagen” which landed in Sweden.
@@davidwright7193 😂😂😂
@@davidwright7193to be fair, I have done the reverse: fly into Copenhagen and hop on a train to an appointment in Malmö. Works great.
If Ryan air doesnt want to fly into and out of Germany other carriers will
The search for better product quality will increase production costs. Will Boeing be able to continue to sell off its planes to Ryanair?
Is their anything o'leary doesn't complain about.
Pretty good all round, faa is stepping up, Boeing is being forced to build safe aircraft, Germany is cracking down on aviation in general forcing people to think twice before stepping on a plane. I'll never, ever, get on a Ryanair plane. People need to vote with their choices.
“We’ll leave your country! Unless… Unless you cut my taxes!!!”
Never gets old
UK Air paasenger duty for Band C, over 5,500 miles from April 2025 will range from £94 to £673. Which I believe is a lot more than Germany charge.
I do not understand how the 737-Max7 is not certified when it was used to certify the Max8
The Max 8 and Max 9 were certified before the MCAS incident. Now, the FAA is being extra cautious about certifying additional jets from Boeing. Having similar jets just means the certification process is easier than a clean sheet design
I’ve never flown on a Max since I don’t trust Boeing and have no intention of doing so. I’ll stick with Airbus
ok.explain me why ryanair flight whatever just landed safely then
Ryanair is in a pickle. They need those aircraft being made and certified by EASA which I doubt will happen anytime soon whatever happens with the FAA.
Boeing is in trouble because CEO had one task- Keep share price UP. He was not tasked with keeping the PLANES UP.
Never mind, next year when Elon Musk closes down the FAA as "a waste of money that interferes with business" Boeing won't have to bother with silly things like flight controls that crash planes or doors that fall off.
Remember the time O’Leary was considering the Comac C-919 ?? What ever happened to that idea ?? 😂😂
Boeing envelope arrived full of filthy cash, Allegedly
Every downturn will have an upturn, when a company leaves a market, another company will fill its place. If There is still a demand. other companies will get their chance.
i hate to say it but i just wouldn't fly on the max, too much has gone on for me to even put myself on a seat on one of them.
In France taxpayers are subsidising Ryanair at regional airports because Ryanair boss is a stingy bastard
For work, I did 9 different flights this fall in Europe ( US citizen). All tickets were Priority type, with seats in row 2 or 3, one large suitcase checked in, 1 overhead bin bag and personal item. Almost all had priority check in, priority security and priority boarding. The most expensive one was the Munich-Torino (one way) that cost me 400% more than any other ticket, because it was with Lufthansa, not a budget airline. No budget airlines options at MUC for my flight.
No that is happening because of the politicians.
Taxpayers paying the airport bills is Ryanair's business model. Those airports which accepted it hoped that Ryanair would attract more customers and especially airlines. But I don't know a single case where this worked out.
However, the raised costs at airports in Germany are true, even LH cut down regional connections lately.
You are amongst friends, don't be afraid to say what you mean 😂
Boeing will just offer O’Leary more discounts to keep him as a customer.
O'Leary might be controversial, but he's usually spot-on in his observations. Germany is in rapid and drastic decline. Over the last twenty years, the succeeding German governments have been making own goal after own goal. German industry is in rapid decline. The German medical system is in rapid decline. German carmakers are in rapid decline. German engineering is in rapid decline. Now, German tourism is on the verge of the same. O'Leary has been the most outspoken, but his views are not unique. I divide my time between Germany, the UK and the US. I make a point of avoiding German airports because they're more expensive to use and their product quality is appalling. Comparing Copenhagen and Berlin is like comparing night and day. Copenhagen is efficient, user-friendly and competitively priced. Berlin is a sh*tshow. Hamburg is just as bad, but even more expensive. Germany is going to have to learn the hard way that it is not special. Airlines in general, not just Ryanair, are cutting back. The problem is that Germany is so arrogant, so fundamentally incapable of admitting that they're wrong about anything, that they're going to keep running themselves into the ground until it's too late. I'm sure I'll get angry responses from Germans which miss the point completely.
scrap the MAX and stick with the - 700 powered by RR BR 700 and the -800 powered by CFM 56
Go away, Ryanair.
RYAN Air is a Tax-avoiding stinker and became thrown out of Denmark by our Trade Unions, wanting decent pay for its employees. They wanted to just pay low Irish Wages in an upcoming Hub in Cph. I think as a First they became convinced that they had to pay a Salary for getting work done! They still fly from Cph. but now from ordinary conditions, as any other Company!
But sas is doing well isn’t oh wait, it went bust.
Might be something to do with overpaid Dane’s and being in efficient?
@@JohnJones-k9d A lot of Airlines operate from Cph. without going bust. We still have Airbus 380 landing also! I flew to Egypt one time, changing in Frankfurt from I think Lufthansa, and the treatment on the three legs, till I changed to SAS when going home, were considerably better than the last. So it is more likely a fault of SAS, which hasn't been able to attract High Paying Customers, wanting to pay ½ a year's salary for me, to fly First or Business Class!
That's why SAS opened a second division in order to pay lower Irish wages and benefit from Ireland's weaker worker protection laws! Absolutely hilarious comment!
@@Bunnyroo7 Of course! Don't expect a Scandinavian Company to behave any better than most, if not kept in line by Strong Unions! If The Irish started working in their own interests, they could also obtain decent work conditions by forming Unions, but with a Government trying to attract Companies through low taxes and - low wages, they are a little lost for now.
Ryan Air learned, I think as a First, the "Hard Way" how to behave in Scandinavia, but it took many years and many hard fights for the workers in Scandinavia to come that far! We are standing on the shoulders of those! And we are only indirectly able to inspire other countries to do the same!
You are actively promoting layziness and incompetence in Scandinavia. Denmark and Norway not so much, but Sweden is. I have a personal experience working for SAS, and while some people worked hard(the one with knowledge), some, and system allows it, did nothing or a bare minimum, and we all got almost equally paid. There is no punishment for fuckups, no fear for work at all. Benefits for workers are ok, until it is a systematic misuse of a system.
I’m thinking this Germany raising taxes is going to have bigger legs Thai originally thought. I expect larger carriers to have similar messages soon
Just some more aviation news for you. easyJet is opening two new bases in Italy, Milan linate and Rome Fiumicino
My prediction is costs will reduce, if the Chinese can certify their airplane for the EU. Budget companies like Ryanair would definitely not worry about the aircraft coming from someone who is not Airbus or Boeing. And Ryanair customers might say their concerned about it being Chinese but then still fly on it.
Thanks for this update Dj!!
Germany should not allow itself to be bullied by Ryanair on taxes and fees.
O'Leary upset!! Oh Dearie me !! Something must be done. Can't have Michael upset, can we. What a tosser.
O’Leary..schadenfreude.😂
Michael O'Leary, may be a Marmite/Vegimite character, but as a leading Airline Executive, I totally agree with his points of view,
Jeez I hope Boeing can rebound from where they are rn
Ryanair - always quick to lecture the governments of the counties where they've taken market share as soon as things don't fit their business model!
WHO cares if Ryan air leaves Germany. It‘s anyhow only a tax dodger
Ryanair is heavily hit with Boeing's inability to fulfill their orders, anyway. Besides, they are not the only low cost carrier around, who, BTW, cannot rely indefinitely on governments subsidizing second-tier airports.
It doesn’t matter if Michael O’Leary is liked or disliked, lower taxes mean lower prices. Play the ball and not the man.
The delays are in the FAA
Great job, I enjoy your Boeing updates, they have to find a way to get along with O’Leary and Tim Clarke. They must get things right with the 777X and get it together quickly or the 797 is doomed.
Ryanair as stated would love to invest in the German market but in my opnion Lufthansa has done a sterling job of undermining Ryanair over the years. Many Germans would not contemplate using Ryanair as a result of the negative propaganda spread by Lufthansa. Harsh yes and stupid yes but that is the reality of the current situation.
Wait. What huge Boeing news?
The little Elf with the over-sized mouth has never bought aircraft from AIRBUS because they wouldn't sell their aircraft to him at the price he wanted to pay, so he bought from Boeing as they build aircraft down to the price airlines wanted to pay.........like the shoddy tailor, "never mind with the lack of the material's quality, feel the width you are getting".
Loved that tv prog from years ago
"Never mind the Quality, Feel the Width".
If Ryanair is angry then I'm happy!
Isn't there a concept called price elasticity? If you charge too much for your landing slot, you will lose revenue, perhaps equivalent to what the price hike was supposed to generate per use. Result zero net growth. Mr. Greedy strikes again😢😮
This isn’t about landing slots, I think they are negotiated in the beginning, and are fixed with incremental increases over the years . This is more about the passenger movement charge, which would cover things like security screening , and perhaps ground handling like baggage handling.
@paulsz6194 well made point. I think he is mouthing off.
Mr O is complaining, because Berlin cuts subsidies for tourism and infrastructure related. So small airports, linked to small counties, are increasing airport fares to cover the balance sheet
They are coming very soon,be patents.
Boeing needs to have its all of its upper leadership replaced!
Its the Leadership culture that broke Boeing, All of them need to go. And we need Employee elected Board members of 25% of the board. Chosen from inside the Company.
They need to be honest and come out with a statement. That the era of Stock buybacks is over.
And Investors should be prepared to not receive any dividends for the next 5 years, but it will help make it more profitable in the future.
Ryanair is a third rate airline operating third rate planes.
When comes to my safety and even ultimate financialwell being I'll trust the German government over Ryanair everyday of the week.
Since the FAA used the Max 7 to recertification of Max back into service after grounding it makes no sense that it is not yet certified! And how is the FAA going to work with certification of AB in the future 🤔
You are not following
@ I know 7&10 are now holding do to engine cowl material. For de icing. But that surfaced later.
AB if Airbus, Certified in Europe
Still needs FAA to fly to US and other areas.
@@stevesmoneypit6137 FAA certification is for USA market, other countries have their own agencies.
Never fly Ryanair
Millions do, and millions wouldn't if it wasn't for Ryanair.
If it were me I'd have nationalized Boeing and got proper management going, fix the company from the ground up, made sure corners stopped being cut and retained a controlling stake to make profit for US citizens. At this point you can't rely on the company to fix itself. And to be clear, Boeing does a lot with national defence so it makes sense to just step in and say enough is enough. Handing them any money is too risky.
Sounds like he's being strangled! And he tries to use more complicated words than are necessary. Not successfully!
If we do not support our industries, we wonb't have any.
China smiles and waves...
Anyone else disturbed by the B roll of the workers at Boeing (or subcontractor) wearing Hawaiian shirts etc… no standards, over weight slobs and generally unprofessional looking?
Noticed that too
well,surprise surprise,airlines are angry at airbus delays as well!
Boeing delays stem from their own internal problems, Airbus delays stem from supply chain issues and the fact there are 3000x more A320 family members ordered than 737 Max's
Boring…
A green German govt! LOL. Ryanair could fly to Holland and bus pax to Germany!
I think Boeing are going into lawnmower repairs in the near future.
You want to get your grass cut correctly right😂?
Nooo .... there knives and other dangerous moving parts in a lawnmower.
He runs a bucket shop airline. Fleecing customers left, right and centre. Always moaning when things don’t go his way.
literlay saying put taxpayer money to use to push boeing in the right direction - money well spend? i dont think so in my opinion - it sends the signal if i fail hard enough the gouverment is dicking me out with taxpayer money
Switch to airbus, if it’s Boeing- I’m not going…
The US taxpayer should be buying Boeing, not bailing them out. The company needs to be put under conservatorship to clean up corruption and greed just like we did with GM fifteen years ago.
Let’s not forget that the a320 had 4 fatal accidents in its first 5 years of operation. This is worse than the max, but you guys seem to forget that as you trash Boeing and the max.
All 4 caused by pilot error, not by major design flaw of the aircraft.
And how many a320neo planes were lost? 0, ok.
Well we all know the reason was MCAS, and a lack of proper pilot training on how to use it. So what was Airbus’ fatal flaw on the A320 when it was released, then?? 🤔🤔
I expect Boeing to recover quickly now it’s dumped DEI. If they sack the DEI hires as well it will happen sooner.
What about having LOST the baseline of doing the jobs safely and correctly for the last 2 decades.
Get Elon Musk on it!
😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣
Twiiter -X shows otherwise
The US taxpayer should be buying Boeing, not bailing them out. The company needs to be put under conservatorship to clean up corruption and greed just like we did with GM fifteen years ago.