Win Every Criminal Case From Now On!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 вер 2024
- Listen to this clip by the late Rick Shramm from the On Point II seminar telling you how corrupt state court is and what you can do about it to WIN every time!
Also check out shop.freedomfro... to get private tags and dashcams to prove your claim when you sue in Federal court for damages for violation of rights. You can also find 15 minute blocks of consult time available here if you are interested in learning about how you can sue whoever violated your rights! shop.freedomfro...
Thank you and God bless you all!
if cops were truley public servants they would arrest every judge
They should arrest each other for not upholding the Constitution after they took an oath to uphold the Constitution. After an auto body repaiman stole my car and put the vin number into a salvaged, flooded pile of crap , couldn't get the cops to look at it or write a report, or get my door back for evidence. I finally sent them a report, didn't do any good. It's been 13 months and still hasn't been reported to any agency by them because "they do not know how to report a car stolen if I still have one with the same vin in it" They better not stop me for any measly infraction because I'm totally fed up with their ineptness. And it doesn't stop there, it's been that way all the way up the line. I've never seen so many agencies point their finger to some other agency to handle it.
"not upholding the Constitution after they took an oath to uphold the Constitution." ruhihan sd, consider for a moment that "the People" referred to in the constitution may not be referring to you and me, but refers to the name of a private trust, the beneficiaries of which are not you and me...
Rod Ciferri bullshit. It refers to the people of this country in general. All that private trust bullshit is made up nonsense by some internet con man.
They're all foreigners due to filling a FARA form
They don't arrest fellow masonic brotherhood members, that's why cops don't turn on cops
I went to traffic court for a jaywalking ticket not too long ago. I had just learned about this 'legal fiction' stuff, so I decided to use this opportunity to test it. I sat in the gallery of the courtroom, and when the judge called my name I stayed seated and stated that i was representing the legal fiction of Anthony Forwood. The judge asked me to step forward into the court area. I asked if it was a common law court. He said no. I refused to budge, saying that I did not recognize his jurisdiction. A sheriff started to get up, asking the judge if he should arrest me. The judge stopped him and banged his gavel, dismissing the case.
I don't remember signing the ticket. I doubt that I did because the pig was being a pig and I don't comply with pigginess. I remember I tore it up as soon as I got it, hoping he'd give me a second one for littering. No luck there.
A common law court is where they deal with non-criminal things.... city bylaws, etc. Traffic court is common-law court.
No, it was a common law court. The judge was lying when he said it wasn't. He was trying to convince me of his authority. He already knew where I was going with the legal fiction thing so he tried the next trick, by pretending that there wasn't any such thing as common ;law. But he still had no jurisdiction over me at that point because I hadn't entered into his court yet. I was still in the gallery. If I had entered past the gate into the court area, he would have had jurisdiction and it would have been much harder for me to deal with the situation because it would have been on the court's terms, where they can use all sorts of other tricks to legally entrap me. My refusal to enter the court led the judge to the safest option he had, and that was to dismiss the case before things got worse, because he didn't know how much of this secret information I might know about. I might have known enough to continue to deflect their tricks until they were forced to give up, so the judge just dismissed the case before it got that far. It just wasn't worth it to him for a jaywalking ticket.
So I should try this?
Young Shrine Depends. What are you challenging? If it's a criminal matter, I wouldn't try it for the first time. If it's a bylaw infraction, have at it! Bylaws are common law, non-statutory, so you aren't risking much anyway. But it will give you an opportunity to test this.
I hope that if you do, you'll post a report of the results, good or bad?
So traffic tickets including a no license and no insurance would be considered bylaw infractions?
Yes it works in criminal courts as well. Never enter the BAR (stay seated in the gallery) or answer their questions unless it is with a question. Ask if it’s a criminal matter. Their answer will be yes. There are two types of criminal charges 1. In Equity or 2. In Law. (Say: as As I am the beneficiary, as well as, the Grantor of the JOHN DOE Trust. Who is the injured party in this matter? I ask the alleged judge, prosecutors, police officers et centers if he/ she/they have a claim against the John Doe Trust or if they have been injured by the John Doe Trust. If they say the STATE is the injured party. Then for the record as I am the beneficiary here holding court in good faith for settling any claims against the John Doe Trust bring forth the STATE for cross examination otherwise it’s here say and this matter is discharged. The prosecutor will say that he/she is there representing the STATE. I say: that I object and protest. Do you have first hand knowledge in this matter? His/ her answer is always NO. Is the STATE here for cross examination. The answer is no as the STATE is a fiction. Then for the record this matter is not in Equity then it must be in Law. If it’s in Law then as I am the beneficiary in the matter of the John Doe Trust. We demand the original International Contract bearing wet ink autographs be entered into the record otherwise this matter is discharged as there is no injured party nor is there an International Contract in dispute. We authorize My Honor/the alleged judge) to pay any verifiable valid claim that has been entered into the record as he/she is the appointed fiduciary with a duty and obligation for protecting our property in this matter. This matter is discharged nunc Pro tunc ab initio. Again never enter their BAR, never testify and only answer questions with a question. Object and protest to anything that they declare unless it’s in your favor. Yes I have done this myself and it works. Ps: anything that comes out of an prosecuting attorney mouth object to as its always here say. Ask over and over if they have first hand knowledge in this matter or are they an injured party in this matter or if they have a claim against the John Doe Trust or You. Sincerely Morpheus
does this work at trial or would you need to do this at plea?
It didn't work out for Darrell Brooks 🤣
@@isabelrosas4454 Crooked judges are everywhere.
Say I challenge jurisdiction.
Of course they cannot PROVE jurisdiction.
Also, if you are stuck, you have the absolute right to face your accusers and call any/all witnesses against you.
If it is the STATE of (whatever), then subpoena the entire STATE.
Every man and woman and child.
The people comprise the State.
Obviously they will deny that request. Then you have grounds for appeal due to want of prosecution witness.
What kind of cases have you successfully used this in?
@@jbear6947 Three years of crickets later ... nothing.
If the judge enters a plea for someone, they are practicing law from the bench. And that is against the law, and you can sue that judge in the next highest court.
wrong, you are either guilty or not guilty and if you fail to plead guilty to be sentenced then you are asking for a trial before a Judge or Jury to determine if the plaintiff proved their case against you or not. The defendant doesn't have to say or do anything but sit at the defense table for the Judge or Jury to render a decision for or against you based on the facts of the case per the rules of evidence and if yer not schooled in law, you do yourself a disservice as you may not be able to present your evidence if you don't know when and how to do it. Review the Darrel Brooks criminal case as Darrel had nothing to lose by defending himself as the evidence was irrefutable against him and he was going to prison for life w/o parole even if he had a public defender. lol
@@deborahhershey3045 Wow Karen! Unhinged much? What you just outlined is the basic court procedure, nothing that suggests practicing law from the bench. You need to do some homework before launching such an indictment. It would save you some undue embarrassment, but first you need to work on not making decisions from heightened emotional states. That is the biggest problem most women have yet they don't see it and wonder why their lives are in the shape they're in. SMGDH! 🙄
@@deborahhershey3045 Most crimes are not even crimes. Such as victimless crimes.
You are totally wrong, darryl brook acutally commited a crime@deborahhershey3045
I can't say what "needs" to be in a affidavit but here is what I carry ...
LEGAL NOTICE
Affidavit
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal
Be it known to all that I, Weyman P Cochran own a 1994 Toyota Camry vin # JT2GK12E4R0015601, it is private property consumer goods not equipment . As per UCC 9-109 (1)
Under USC Title 42 §1982. Property rights of citizens …, further evidences the above position that the City or State cannot take land because DO NOT have Jurisdiction. It states that federal or state
governments / agencies MUST have a monetary or proprietary
interest in your real private property in order to have
jurisdiction over it (if your land has no government
grant/funding or is not a subsidized government project, then
agencies have neither). DEMAND any public servant/said agencies
to provide the legal document that allows any federal or state
agency to supercede and/or bypass Title 42 USC §1982 and/or §1441. Title 42 §1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights …, further protects Declarant’s private property.
"... In one of the so-called elevator cases, that of Munn v. Illinois,
94 U. S. 113, [24 L. Ed. 77], it is said: 'When, therefore, one devotes
his property to a use in which the public have an interest, he in
effect grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to
be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the
interest he has thus created.' But so long as he uses his property for
private use, and in the absence of devoting it to public use, the
public has no interest therein which entitles it to a voice in its
control.
"The use to which an item is put, rather than its physical characteristics,
determine whether it should be classified as ``consumer goods'' under UCC 9-109(1) or ``equipment'' under UCC 9-109(2)." Grimes v
Massey Ferguson,
Inc., 23 UCC Rep Serv 655; 355 So.2d 338 (Ala., 1978).
"Under UCC 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for personal use and those purchased for business use. The two are mutually
exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be
considered as determinative." James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv 1028; 266 Cal.App.2d 384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).
"The classification of goods in UCC 9-109 are mutually exclusive." McFadden
v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273
A.2d 198 (1971).
“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, -‘life, liberty, and the pursuit
of happiness;’ and to ‘secure,’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted.
That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these
limitations: first, that he shall not use it to his neighbor’s injury, and that does not mean that he
must use it for his neighbor’s benefit: second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the
public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation.” Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892).
“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than
according to the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20. And;
“In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may”
exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis
means that they “must” exempt them.” State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6
C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
As far as having it registered ...
“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, ...it is
NOT a vehicle that is
REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code
“Passenger vehicles which are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation or
profit, and housecars, are not commercial vehicles”
“a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.”
and; NOT type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. And;
“It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based upon a by reasonable classification, and does not involve any unconstitutional discrimination, although it does not apply to private vehicles, or those used the owner in his own business, and not for hire.” Desser v. Wichita, (1915) 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22.
What must happen …
In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must” exempt them. State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this the _____ day of _______ in the year ___
Weyman Cochran how can I find this online
freedomfromgovernment.org
No law requires you to register your automobile pfd
That's pdf ...
misterunder stood , sorry I'm late ...
Yes it is nation wide ..
I put it together from the site I have listed below or above
Ty
"i don't answer questions" and silence
That’s dishonorable and gives them jurisdiction
A judge can't enter a plea on your behalf if you refuse to enter one,he's practicing law from behind the bench and it's not legal.
So what is he suppose to do? From what I have seen the default decision is not guilty (based off the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty). So if a person refuses to say anything, then is makes sense that they are not admitting guilt therefore are pleading not guilty.
No a plea means you're acknowledging the bullshit jurisdiction the court is trying to imply it has over you. The court and ALL its' constituents are the ones who need to enter into a plea guilty or not guilty of the following: HARRASSMENT, MOLESTATION, RAPE, TYRANNY, THEFT, TRESPASSING, FRAUD, etc. against THE MAN representing the legal entity summoned and on trial. THE MAN the agent of the fictitious entity summoned has charges against THE MEN the agents of the court.
Then challenge jurisdiction if you want. Saying you are not guilty is not saying they had jurisdiction over you. It is saying you don't believe the charges brought against you are not justifiable. Either you believe they are or you believe they aren't.
Judges do it all the time , They dont practice law since the constitution is thrown out . The bill of rights is thrown out . There are on codes and statutes as a corporation for profit . When you participate you volunteer for jurisdiction .You volunteer to be the all capital letter entity and lie along with them . Its all enslavement right there on the spot . Started at the birth certificate . Be your natural self not the fictition , uphold the original constitution , We have to learn more about how to not contract in ! Peace .
'A judge can't enter a plea on your behalf if you refuse to enter one,he's practicing law from behind the bench and it's not legal.'
maybe one assumes a judge entering a plea is practicing 'law'
when it's only 'legal' process? terms different as night and day
Those 99 people that are on top here that do not like this video are probably attorneys
we need more ppl like yall in society.I want to do this too,we are not crimminals.ppl needs to stand up against government harassment.
Jaco, are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Loads of trials move forward without the defendant's participation. You will only pick up contempt charges.
Error! Does not compute! Does not compute! [Judges head explodes]
all countries need to ditch the government systems
Mark Kennedy I totally agree on that 👍
Jaco Jonker so did JFK look what he got railroaded by good ole Georgie bush and LBJ the fed hasn't owned an ounce of gold since 1931 and fort Knox is basically a house of mirrored they move one stack where ever they need to photograph it or the use duct tape to hold up the countries names
Mark Kennedy the District of Columbia is only a 10 square mile area. It is not America! It's codes/statutes don't apply to true Americans but to UNITED STATES Citizens and its employees, only unless you consent to its jurisdiction which would be foolish. Challenge jurisdiction on your first court appearance or anytime before the final phase. You are not the legal name that the court is after. Never claim the name because it is not a man or a woman, but a fictitious entity. These courts operate under a DEFACTO government and can't deal with a living soul, which is why this evil usurped the government and created birth certificates which are persons,"corporations"! They can only deal with contracts and for a contract to be lawful it has to have "FULL DISCLOSURE "! The birth certificate is fraudulent and not ur's, but it belongs to its creator which is the state, not ur parents or you. It's styled in all caps which makes it a corporation. Look up"The truth about the birth certificate " and "The truth about the UNITED STATES ", and you will be enlightened
Mark Kennedy it's the federal reserve system owned and controlled by private foreigners. The UNITED STATES is NOT America but foreign and it's the District of Columbia . It's NOT America !!! Act of 1871. Look it up
Jamie Anderson federal reserve is a problem ate corporation separate from the united States of America they have filed bankruptcy so many times that's why the series of bills changes on the paper money
Look! There is a misunderstanding being promoted, here. Not in the video but with people saying that Traffic Court is a "Common law court!" *IT IS NOT!* And, the video clearly says that it is a *Tribunal.* That means that the "Jurisdiction" is a being held under Military/Maritime law, and they identify that by having an Army, gold fringed flag in all of that type of courtroom: Military/Maritime Commercial law.
Even that is a Fraud, since the state, county and city use One party contract law, and where you are the only signor of that "contract" and the state demands "damages" for infractions of the supposed contract as the injured party ... who did not sign any of those "contracts."
"Common law" courts are held under Constitutional law, and playing "Absent" won't work on those cases, because it is either a common law commercial jurisdiction (two party or more to the subject Contract for damages,) or a criminal jurisdiction, and where an actual crime was alleged; e.g., murder, felonious assault, armed robbery, and even shop-lifting, among a host of other criminal offenses too numberous to name.
When you see a gold fringed flag, do not enter the court, and since it is obviously a military tribunal, but using Maritime commercial law fraudulently....
If you don't enter they put a warrant out for failure to appear
If judge enters a plea for you , isn't that practicing law from the bench which is illegal because the judge is only there to hear the evidence.
No.
Anyone who is in sound mind is allowed to represent themselves. They also have the right /ability to have council at the time. Given they are for advice only. If at any time the attorney speaks for them or on their behalf. The person looses all rights.
It is not practicing law from the bench. There is a specific rule that mandates that the judge enter a plea of not guilty on behalf of the defendant if he refuses to enter a plea.
A friend's son, who claims to be in with the ill-umiNaughty, appeared in court for a speeding ticket. When called he said, “I, (his name), am the living beneficiary of the trust and I appoint you, (the judge) a public servant, as trustee and instruct you to conclude these proceedings in a manner that most benefits me and pay me....” At which point the judge interrupted him, dismissed the charges, brought down the gavel and quickly left the courtroom.
stopdemockery where is the video?
stopdemockery o
right
He left so he could "reenter" and gain jurstriction back over you (if still there) and to the rest of the "people"!!
Try that in Massachusetts ! Your ass will get handed to you toot sweet! Along with a free stay at the crow bar inn!
If you don't participate then the judge will issue you a bench warrant!
Exactly
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
I have been arrested 2 years ago without a license, plate and no insurances, I told the police I wasn't participating, he took my name by looking at my medical insurance in Canada (that is illegal for him to do), I told him I did not accept his ticket and did not sign anything. I received a register mail about 2 weeks later but did not get it cause I did not provide any ID cards. So when I when to verified my old license number cause I needed an ID to take a flight within Canada (Obligated now), I had nothing on my account, no ticket or fee at all. I never when to court neither. So, I found out that way that if I don't give any paper and don't accept them, they have nothing! :)
Unelady Anything you say or do will be used against you in a court of law. Therefore, never show ID or answer questions including volunteering a name...cover up the VIN too. No injured party, no crime...no crime, no argument, no argument no case. Cheers!
Unelady in the United States when a officer gives you a ticket, they make you sign the ticket or they lock you up for not signing it, that right there means you are in distress, when the officer physically threatens you to signing the ticket
Archangel 68 bullshit. At least in the US. If you are at the wheel on a public road and a cop pulls you over you are required to give your license. The courts have upheld this.
That nonsense about no victim no crime comes from some idiots misunderstanding the term corpus delicti.
It means the body of the crime. The principle is you can't charge someone with a crime if you can't prove a crime was committed. It has nothing to do with whether there is a victim or not.
@@wideglide19661 I recently learned that you can write: UCC 1-207 on the ticket and then sign it, but I wouldn't sign it.
@@jayess9752 I seem to recall a Texas case where some hispanic got pulled over for no plates, or expired plates, or inspection out of date or something like that, and his pickup was searched and the cops found dope of some sort for which he was arrested, tried and convicted. Upon appeal, the court said that since the dude was not in any commercial activity for which he needed plates or inspection, the vehicle was not of the type that needed them so the cop had no legal reason to pull the dude over in the first place, so any dope that was found was by an illegal search, and the conviction was overturned. Can't think of the name of the case offhand, but I believe it was within the latter part of the 20th century. Texas vs. Garcia? Garza? Check around from the 50's to the end of 20th century (more likely 60s or 70s though).
Maybe I am misunderstanding what he is trying to say, but, if he is making the claim that if you're not there, and the trial goes on, you can have it done away with he is wrong. They will try your case in your abscence in criminal courts and it will stand.
"I wasn't there but I was there. I made an appearance without making an appearance." This makes sense to this guy, and many others. Why are so many people today going completely insane?
Ask the judges.. thats THEIR logic. I guess Jesus was right."woe unto them that call good evil and evil good"
ARE EWE ABLE TO GRASP A STRAW MAN ?
@@MrTopcat3333 STRAW MAN.....a person regarded as having no substance or integrity. Yep, that pretty much describes this guy who is lying to people about some magic get out of jail free card. It's pathetic.
@@MrTopcat3333 get away from the strawman. Check out alphonse faggiolo
@@jandrefelix3577 No that is not the Judges logic as to make an appearance in court, you must be HEARD on the record and the only places that have microphones are at the Judges' bench, the witness box, and the plaintiff and defense tables who can share a podium. The rules of the Court allow for only 1 to speak at a time in order for the tranSCIPTionist to capture each word spoken for 'the record' Modern technologies provide us with VIDEO live streaming that prevents human error and should replace the cost of transcripts that are $1/page for pro se's and free for members of the BAR who work for FEDeral, stATE or local gOVERnMEnt$ as they represent the PUBLIC as a whole and all of its parts which includes gOVERnMEnts$ lol so whilst Lady Just ICE is suppose to be BLIND to race, religion, age, gender and creed it is a system created by huMANs who are not GOD as power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely and why NO ONE is to be ABOVE THE LAW .... and why we can appeal any Judge's decision and petition our reps to make new laws based on 2/3's vote for Judges to follow which cancels out the MOB rule that 51% can rule over 49% ...
I understand what you are saying ,but won't the case stay open and valid, as long as you don't admit your name, and then you will have to answer for the warrant
"I'll take Things the public school system will never teach for $1,000 Alex". Love the info. A reenactment would so help with visuals of the affidavit (example) and how to submit said paperwork.
@@Will_JC sure, what about?
@@tooshay7396: DON'T TAKE THE BAIT STAY AWAY FROM: (@Will JC "AND" Hannibal Rex).. THEY'RE "GOV. PAID WHORES AKA GOV. TROLLS/SHILLS": . SERIOUSLY....
I don't need the money, I just enjoy teaching others how to obtain freedom. If you are still looking for info, I've got plenty to give: how to beat EVERY/ANY charge; and even if one is already charged and/or convicted, I can teach them how to get kicked out of prison or jail with ALL charges and parole, etc. being dismissed. And you don't even have to file anything with the courts
@@rebelwithacause5402 I would like to hear about this. Can you send me some things so I can learn
@@cassaracraig9415 NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL; NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
"Any judge (or official) who does not comply with … the Constitution of the United States … is engaged in acts of treason"(Cooper v. Aaron), and "as per Ryder v. United States Supreme Court, I am required to initiate a direct challenge to the authority of anyone representing himself, or herself to be a government officer or agent prior to the finality of any proceeding in order to avoid implications of de facto officer doctrine, [and] when challenged, those posing as government officers and agents are REQUIRED to Affirmatively PROVE whatever authority they claim."
So, I must DEMAND to see a current and valid copy of your Constitutional Oath of Office and the "CERTIFICATION" of "CONSTITUTIONALITY" on any and ALL instruments that you present or intend to present to me as a flesh and blood living soul.
I am not required by Law to identify my physical body in any way, shape, or form, and if you are "DEMANDING" to see some sort of "Identification", then you are infringing upon my 5th and 4th Amendment Right to Remain Silent, Still, and to be Let Alone, and you have intentionally engaged in a preplanned Act of Terrorism subject to CRIMINAL charges under U.S. Code 18, Section 2381 -- TREASON.
"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them"(Miranda v. Arizona). "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of a Constitutional Right" (a.k.a. my Right to Remain Silent and let alone)(Sherar v. Cullen). "If the State converts a liberty into a privilege (by demanding to see some sort of "Identification", a Fifth and Fourth Amendment violation), the citizen can engage in the right with impunity"(Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham). "The Right to be let alone is the most comprehensive of Rights, and the Right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment"(Olmstead v. U.S.; 4th Amendment to the Constitution).
Under Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, I have the Right to NOT Contract with you, and I will not be "Contracting" with you. "Every man is independent of all laws except those prescribed by Nature. He is not bound by [the rules and regulations] of any institutions formed by his fellowman without his consent"(Cruden v. Neale), and I DO NOT CONSENT.
im in the uk. Aint none of this shit working ere cuss the judges wud just throw u bk in jail.
Jamie Cropper a couple magistrates acting as judges have been dragged kicking and screaming
After understanding the Act of 1871, everyone should read Hepburn v. Griswold, 75 US 603 (1869), which refused to allow paper money to be legal tender due to the constitution stating nothing but gold and silver could be legal tender. The Act of 1871 was in response to Hepburn, which was a fatal blow to the bankers dreams of enslaving humanity. After the Act of 1871, and just two years after Hepburn, SCOTUS overruled its own Hepburn decision in Knox v. Lee, 79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457 (1871). If you actually read it, you will see Knox is a gigantic (well over 200 pages) logical fallacy in the form of a circular argument. The circular argument cannot be confirmed until near the end of the opinion. Be warned - if you read Knox - you will be enraged when you get to the end. Knox was extremely important to the history of this county. At the same time the Act of 1871 set up a secret tyranny, Knox made it clear that all the units of government would pretend that nothing really changed. SCOTUS has been a complete and utter abomination since the "legal tender cases" (Knox being one of them).
Peter schiff was talking about this ....interview with valuetainment
I don't have access to lexus nexus. What's a good source for Knox and Hepburn cases to enforce tender of payment, payment by check or money order and public law 73-10? Thax
@@washitawanu Do a general internet search of the case citations within quotation marks - US Supreme Court cases come up no problem at the top of the list. For Knox, cut and paste this into your search field "79 U.S. (12 Wall.) 457" For Hepburn, search this "75 US 603" For tougher to find cases, search for and use google scholar.
@@rodciferri9626 appreciated!
The three people who thumbed this down are probably prosecutors or judges who are mad you are sharing this information 😁
No, more than 51% of the population laughs at what's called the "sovereign citizen" who protects themselves by actually knowing what's really going on, and especially knows what's going on inside of the criminal justice system. The legal 1789 Constitution does 2 things, limits government and protects the sovereign citizen from an out of control government. That 51% don't deserve what the Creator endowed to them and deserve all the punishment Bar Association attorneys hand them. Obama's justice department thru the FBI sent a memo to law enforcement to declare the sovereign as domestic terrorists. Meanwhile, the FBI has jurisdiction to investigate civil rights violations. Doesn't make much sense, they're on both sides of the fence.
ExcessInModeration it's because if ur sovereign then ur not a citizen. Only use sovereign !!!
Just Me funny you say the courts won't allow you to operate without an attorney--I did just that this last Wednesday, and got the outcome I wanted.
Just Me. can you please explain to me exactly how claiming sovereign is a waste.
Just Me, what is to deal in fiction
They always need you to identify as the thing held in trust, if the controversy is the use of that name, so who is bringing the claim of controversy? May I meet the claimant to settle in private? We are always the ones making the claim to that title or name which causes the controversy, the error in the name is irrelevant if the body is certain, don't put your body in place of the name for surety, it's your name that's making the claim, that's who the prosecutor is, he is using your name for profit, and when you answer your making a claim to the same name as the prosecutor which causes controversy, that's why people who bring the birth certificate sometimes have success because they have a superior claim using an endorsed certificate, the prosecutor can not get past that because he can't get your certificate, you are always the prosecutor even when your the defendant, the bid bond, payment and performance bonds all have your name as the principal, the prosecution is using them to bond the case and fund the restitution as a state contractor, but it's also used to discharge the charges when you win
Jim Flask m
It is a trust that they're holding you under...
Tell the judge that you're the beneficiary to the named trust that they called, and that makes the judge the trustee, and the prosecutor is the administrator... watch how fast the judge throws it out... no-one ever wants to be the trustee... they make you assume that role when you're ignorant to that fact... they're playing a game with you, but they're not telling you the rules, or the roles in which you're all playing...
Especially if they ask you if you "understand", and you agree... you've just agreed to "stand under" their rules...
A.K.A "WHOS THE CLAIMANT?" THANK YOU !! Well said.
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
Sf24-91
Show us your factual evidence that any of this worked,Im sure you cant.
I can confirm it does work. been to court twice now and done it on both occassions, they need you to be the debter for your corporation name that the crown own, I say I go by my name and i have no second name, no man is a name.
the 2nd time i went they tried a few tricks to get me to claim the corporation name. they left my case till the end cus they dont want anyone else to see what i do, then they asked me to leave the court room, i sat in the hallway by myself while more police and lawyers piled into the court (the usual attempt to try to intimidate ppl to do what they want you to do) then 20 mins later the court announcer guy pops his head out the door and shouts "Mr ****** (surname), the court is ready for you now". a blatent attempt to try and get me to enter the court as the corporation. i did not move, again 5-10 mins later he pops his head out avoiding looking at me and shouts the same thing even though I am only 2 feet from him and the only person in the hall. again i did not move as i was wise to their deceit. another 5-10 mins go by then 3 police come out to me and say i am free to go, so knowing that talking to police is never a wise thing to do i said ok and left.
I know some find doing this difficult but all you have to remind yourself of is that these people are all crooks, the defraud millions of people all around the world every day just to maintain power over them, they make the rules and they are made to siut them but as with any rules they work both ways. never ever claim to be anything other than the name you were given, your MR or MRS and surname are property of the crown, do not claim to be it or they own your ass, thats why police always want your corporate name, so they can exploit you.
@@hippyhappyhobo369 Were both of your court cases due to traffic infractions? Did you try right to travel? did you just show up cause the policy enforcer write you tickets for breaking a statue or code? I would really like to try this myself.
@Brian Lile I'll have some proof. I go into court September 17 and I will live stream this on my phone. Then you will get your "proof" you are so desperately asking for.
No experience no opinion, soz.
@Brian Lile Go try it for yourself instead of telling others they are full of crap
After waiting for an eternity they finally called my name, I stood up and I asked the judge if this: was a common law court, he asked me if I could repeat myself, so I asked again he told me it was such and such district courts, in said city and state of the United States of America I then “said in all due respect I do not recognize your jurisdiction and authority over this case...... “. he grabbed his gavel slammed the gavel down and said 30 days! He instructed to court officers to take me away!
Hey, I'm going to court tomorrow for a traffic ticket and was planning on copying exactly what you said to the judge....Please be honest; did you really end up staying in jail for a month? How did your case end up?
Aven Louis I was transported back to the same court and judge 14 days later where after a half a day into court hearings my name was called, , where the judge said to me .. " you might have had a bad day , or you were not on top of your game the last time you appeared in this court,,, so I'm giving you a chance to apologize to myself and the people of this court ". At that point I went into my detailed explanation of how I distrust the system and how the little guy is always the one getting screwed and paying into the system and at that point I gave a half hearted apology .. After a long pause ... He dismissed the charges ! I then asked if they could be without prejudice .... And he allowed that ! He also said " I hope you learned something today " ... Biting my tounge. I said " yes sir. ". And off I went.
Aven Louis let me know how you make out. @. Freddfixer@gmail.com Good luck
@@fearlessfred89 Thanks for the explanation and well wish....Maybe you just mistyped, but from what I just looked up, "without" prejudice means that the dismissal of charges is only temporary....
@@fearlessfred89 Although, Id like to get out of this $300 speeding ticket, it's not worth me risking spending 2 weeks in jail.
My friend witnessed prisoner rapes and fights with newcomers at jail near Tampa. I hope your stay was safe and peaceful....
What city were you in and what would you do differently if you could redo the initial court appearance?
I went to court to test this out too...I asked who was the trustee of the account, twice, said I was here on this matter....magistrate didn't answer me and said if I didn't leave the court I would be thrown out! Ahaaaa...they sent me a letter stating the amount of the fine for the parking ticket...now I am going on March 29th to appeal...I will then ask for their jurisdiction over me....see how that goes.
Will you lose a day's pay to fight a parking ticket? Are you guilty? If the answer to these ?'s is yes, then you deserve to lose a day's pay and pay the ticket + court costs. To go to traffic court and ask for proof of JURISdiction is an oxiMORON as the JUDGE is the JURISdiction over disputes between the plaintiff and the defendant who is the accused offender. Juris is a Latvian variant of the name George, which is of Greek origin. Juris means “farmer” or “earthworker” (from ancient Greek “gê/γῆ” = earth/soil + “érgon/ἔργον” = work). Who toils the soil? CAIN who is GOD of the hqrVEST. DICTION is a choice of words especially with regard to correctness, clearness, or effectiveness. There is nothing effective in the choice of words soveREIGN SHITizens choose to abUSE lol as they confuse criminal and civil laws; cherry pick from case laws that may win at the lower court level but fail in higher courts but most do not understand legal language to comprehend what they read in case laws and they all FAIL to read the 10th AMENDment that gives each state SOVEREIGN RIGHTS to govern w/in their STATE borders and everyone in it that is not specified by the Bill of Rights that protects our race, religion, gender, age and creed as established by the FATHER of the new jerUSAlem is GEORGE Washington who's name is derived from the English place name. Region of origin. ENGLAND and if you read the TREATy between GEORGE WASHINGTON and KING GEORGE III > 3 of ENGLAND, we did not get our INDEPENDENCE from ENGLAND lol and WASHINTON DC and lonDON are the 2 twistED cITies$ on the hILLs$ of jeRIChO for the MESS I AH to cHANGe US back to A rePUBLIC of JUDE [o CHRISTians] as the GOVERNing reLigION/LION reig
Proto-Indo-European root meaning "stretch; be stretched; be stiff"
It forms all or part of: reach; rigid; rigidity; rigor.
It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Sanskrit rjyati "he stretches himself," riag "torture" (by racking); Greek oregein "to reach, extend;" Latin rigidus "hard, stiff, rough, severe," rigēre "be stiff;" Lithuanian raižytis "to stretch oneself;" Old Irish ringid "torture," rigim "I stretch;" Middle High German ric "band, string;" Old High German reihhon, Old English ræcan, ræcean "to reach, achieve," on notion of "to stretch out."
@@deborahhershey3045 That was magnificent. It was like watching a redneck speak perfect Mandarin to a street vendor in Shanghai.
@@deborahhershey3045
*CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA*
*CIVILITER MORTUUS*
You should have challenged jurisdiction
What a bunch of B.S. Anyone who has ever been in real trouble with the law knows that this type of crap is just an Express ticket to prison.
Evan Snow Yeah the only reason why it is working is because the people doing this have only been charged with something like Jay walking or going 5 miles an hour over the speed limit. You start talking like a sovereign citizen in court when you’re charge is so little the judge is just going to get annoyed and throw it out so he doesn’t have to listen to your mouth. If you were getting charged with something big like robbery or manslaughter, there is too much money for the court to make off of you and they want to send you to prison. This will not work on charges like this you will be found in contempt and be thrown in jail instantly if you’re not already in jail and they will give you the max sentence if you’re found guilty because of the trouble you gave the judge in your case.
It works I've used this several times for several different charges including dui.
RevRSleeker - never underestimate what can be accomplished by being a supreme pain in the !@s to petty tyrants - they want to fleece the sheep rather than the wolves - just like anyone else they're going for the easy money!
"Express ticket to prison" - Evan Snow - unless everyone did it. Then it's not BS - it's law that works perfectly!
tankapples, thank you very little for your gratuitous and useless comment.
If you know what your doing the Judge will respect that.
I've heard of people refusing to give their name because it's hearsay evidence.
Once you challenge jurisdiction, the court has to stop right there and address the challenge. They cannot move an inch.
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆The team above can help you
Hire a good team to get you concrete evidence on the case you don't need to depend all alone on your lawyers with a private investigator you can simply get all the evidence you need and provide it's to your lawyer and don't just sit there and do nothing and waste all this money for nothing
Michael, are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Absolutely wrong. You have to file a motion and it will be denied unless the case needs to be tried in a different jurisdiction.
What does he say at 1:42? "Let the record reflect [garbled].."
Its called cause of action. Which gives a court jurisdiction. There are 3 elements to have cause of action in a court of law. Claiming damaged property, damage to person, or violation/deprivation of an inalienable right. Without the majority of these elements a court cannot preside of cases without the jurisdiction to do so.
A cause of action in LEGAL terms is a set of predefined factual elements that allow for a legal remedy. The factual elements needed for a specific cause of action can come from a Constitution, Statute, Judicial Precedent or Administrative regulation and all 4 are gOVERnMEnt as in YOU and ME who are CITIZEN CAiN > I CAN REDress grievances against fellow citizens or any enTITy that serves the PUBLIC which means I CAN win or lose in CoUrT as a plaintiff or defendant .... in a criminal or civil matter. THE 10th AMENdMent states that The Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people ... not the person nor group w/less than 2/3's vote ... thus, unless Sovereign Citizens are 2/3's of the voting population in any given state to set aside the 10th Amendment, STATES' rights not delegated to the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION of These United States go back to the people of the state and the majority of people in all states do not proSCRIBE to soveREIGN SHITizen CULTure of driving w/o a license, registration and proof of insurance in case of accident/s so yer SOL as we have our wild west days to look back to the days when Americans were soveREIGN as there ware no State gOVERnMEnts back in the days of cowboys v AMERICAN INDIANS and GOoD cowboys v bad cowboys at the OK CORRAL where the winner lives and loser dies via a gun fight . lol
The judge enters a plea? Isn't that fraud? Practicing law from the bench?
I have been waiting for years to watch all these “victories”. Everyone be sure to post your videos, so others can be witness to your success. 👍👍
Seeing this two years later.
And now we know why the injustices happen
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
Half correct. I had those same Private tags on what I thought l was my car but the police took/towed the car. I was charged with 8 criminal offense. I beat all of them and expunged the charges because of my affidavit. I was not allowed to get the car back because if it’s in an all caps name, that is STATE property.
So how do you prevent that?
@@divulgewithchip1099 Register your car in a foreign trust so they can't administer over it
I would say fictitious name and then copyright your name. Then you own it. put a fee schedule when you record it at the clerks office. Thats what i am setting up. I the living man, will own nothing but my vessel will. I will be in behalf of my corporate name. Then my Estate/Trust will control that entity. Then i will get a foreign grantors trust to control the that...3 layers...
NEVER REGISTER YOUR PROPERTY WITH THE LEGAL FICTION KNOWN AS THE 'STATE', THAT MAKES IT A PROPERTY MAYTER, AND ONE-SIDED CONTRACT, WHICH IS ALSO ILLEGAL.
TO BE LEGALLY BINDING, ALL CONTRACTS MUST BE MUTUALLY AGREED TO, NOT 'SURPRISE'!
YOU ARE NOW LEGALLY BOUND BY THE TERMS LAID OUT, EVEN IF YOU WERE NEVER TOLD ABOUT THEM, TOO BAD.
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
This is basically a go-to guide on how to get arrested.
Everytime.
Yeah its not for cowardly slaves. Just take the mark when It's time.
Long Jenkins lmfao!!!! 😂 😂 🤣 😂 That reply is awesome!!! 😂 😂
@@marvelousmitch972 god gave me a premonition of this...scary shit these sheep dont even know their own soul and that's why they are cowards totally afraid to "die"
My son has been jailed for over 6 weeks now someone entered a plea not guilty. He's 36 never been I trouble he and a friend were ambushed by 4 Hispanic in Florida. One held my son and one beat him unconscious the others held back his friend. After my son was on the ground unconscious and still being brutally beat his friend managed to pull his gun and shot at the surrounding 4 men. He tried not to kill or hurt them just didn't want them to kill my son which they were obviously attempting. The 3 not hitting my son received minor injuries from fragments on leg and arm I believe. In hospitals Friday out Sunday. They told the cops some story about it not being their fault. They were let go my son and friend in jail no bail set they have not seen any judge. The bailiff or whoever says bail or not. Apparently via the lawyer assigned to my son 5 weeks in she says he's not even supposed to do it and he almost always says no bail the place is so crowded sleeping on floors. My son has horrible headaches they did not take him into the hospital. He is not doing well he's I'm sure lost his job by now. Apartment too. How can I get him out. Please help me on what I can do. Going this week will be the 7th week. It was self defense. My son was black and blue his head was so out of proportion in his mug shot I almost didn't recognize him. This is bull. So wrong.
Great story, now how about you post up the court evidence of what you are claiming !
10 months on and no response - LOL - you know he made it all up.
Proof of claim is EVERYTHING! May be true, may not work for YOU! if it doesn’t what’s your plan?
seen someone get arrested for failure to comply in court a few years back. He tried the same thing. never answering their questions. Don't know whatever came of it.
Don't they do judgement by default in the US? Here in Germany, if a man goes to a court where the judge a person and the man states he's not the person, he's the man, they make a default jufgement against the person and with that they damage the man, the substance...
Move where? Any suggestions? I do love Texas, but even though I do have friends there who would appreciate my presence, the governemt will not grant the privilege of a permanent VISA, leave alone the harassment at the border and the TSA prior a flight.
Ryan Smith where are you free at? United States ? Lol. Are you a United States citizen?
Yes, yxcmk. If you are to appear in criminal court, and do not, the trial will continue anyway and you will be found guilty .
Im a lawyer in mexico and I would say the main difference is that Germany has a civil law system (same as mexico, if you try that here i can asure you will be convicted), whereas the U.S has a common lawsystem. In a civil law system, the judge has an inquisitorial role. It is his or her job to establish the facts of the case and to apply the statutes of the applicable code.
Don't listen to banamia, all court are connected u.c.c. laws are international law, u.n. connects it all its all corporation look up USC 28 ARTICLE 6 CHAPTER 176 SUBPARAGRAPH A SUBSECTION 3002, 15 (a) United States means federal corporation, birth certificate makes the state owner of the estate ( your name in all capital letters which isn't you but you think it is) and you say yes that's me in court lol
Can you elaborate about your affidavit. I'm not clear on that
Brandon Lee , it's something I put together from ... "no law requires you to register your automobile .pdf"
Brandon Lee ,
LEGAL NOTICE
Affidavit
Notice to the principal is notice to the agent
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal
Be it known to all that I, Weyman P Cochran own the 1994 Toyota Camry vin # JT2GK12E4R0015601, it is private property consumer goods not equipment . As per UCC 9-109 (1)
UCC 9-102 ..definitions ..
(23) "Consumer goods" means goods that are used or bought for use primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
And so ,
“A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a “consumer goods”, ...it is
NOT a vehicle that is REQUIRED to be REGISTERED under this code
“Passenger vehicles which are not used for the transportation of persons for hire, compensation or profit, and housecars, are not commercial vehicles”
“a vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.” and; NOT type of vehicle required to be registered and “use tax” paid of which the tab is evidence of receipt of the tax.” Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv. 1021, 236 A2d 484, UCC PP 9-109.14. And;
“It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is based upon a by reasonable classification, and does not involve any unconstitutional discrimination, although it does not apply to private vehicles, or those used the owner in his own business, and not for hire.” Desser v. Wichita, (1915) 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso. v. Railroad Comrs., 75 A.L.R. 22.
Jurisdiction over private property
What’s necessary for jurisdiction ,
In Wheeling Steel Corp v. Fox , 298 U.S. 193 (1936) it states: Property taxes can be on tangibles or intangibles. In order to have a situs for taxation (a basis for imposing the tax), tangible property (physical property) must reside within the territorial jurisdiction of the taxing authority, and intangibles…
Under USC Title 42 §1982. Property rights of citizens …, further evidences the above position that the City or State cannot take land because they DO NOT have Jurisdiction. It states that federal or state governments / agencies MUST have a monetary or proprietary interest in your real private property in order to have jurisdiction over it (if your land has no government
grant/funding or is not a subsidized government project, then
agencies have neither). Title 42 USC §1982 and/or §1441. Title 42 §1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights …, further protects Declarant’s private property.
“Men are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, -‘life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness;’ and to ‘secure,’ not grant or create, these rights, governments are instituted.
That property which a man has honestly acquired he retains full control of, subject to these limitations: first, that he shall not use it to his neighbor’s injury, and that does not mean that he must use it for his neighbor’s benefit: second, that if he devotes it to a public use, he gives to the public a right to control that use; and third, that whenever the public needs require, the public may take it upon payment of due compensation.” Budd v. People of State of New York, 143 U.S. 517 (1892).
"... In one of the so-called elevator cases, that of Munn v. Illinois,
94 U. S. 113, [24 L. Ed. 77], it is said: 'When, therefore, one devotes
his property to a use in which the public have an interest, he in
effect grants to the public an interest in that use, and must submit to
be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the
interest he has thus created.' But so long as he uses his property for
private use, and in the absence of devoting it to public use, the
public has no interest therein which entitles it to a voice in its
control.
Classification is determined by use ,
“Thus self-driven vehicles are classified according to the use to which they are put rather than
according to the means by which they are propelled.” Ex Parte Hoffert, 148 NW 20.
"The use to which an item is put, rather than its physical characteristics,
determine whether it should be classified as ``consumer goods'' under UCC 9-109(1) or ``equipment'' under UCC 9-109(2)." Grimes v
Massey Ferguson,
Inc., 23 UCC Rep Serv 655; 355 So.2d 338 (Ala., 1978).
"Under UCC 9-109 there is a real distinction between goods purchased for personal use and those purchased for business use. The two are mutually
exclusive and the principal use to which the property is put should be
considered as determinative." James Talcott, Inc. v Gee, 5 UCC Rep Serv 1028; 266 Cal.App.2d 384, 72 Cal.Rptr. 168 (1968).
"The classification of goods in UCC 9-109 are mutually exclusive." McFadden
v Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 8 UCC Rep Serv 766; 260 Md 601, 273
A.2d 198 (1971).
What must happen …
In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervising officials “may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must” exempt them. State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 6 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.
You have been given knowledge ,
Please act accordingly ...
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this the _____ day of _______ in the year ___
That affidavit tha the states u were in court thay day. Not that right to travel pdf
Weyman Cochran
This is dumb
Now, this is interesting information but I'd love to see the affidavit to file in these cases.
Copper Aboriginies Same!!!
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
Where's the video of this working? Please post it? Thank you.
When you consent to being prosecuted for profit without any human rights as a PERSONS allowed privileges , that's what the conflict of interest will do to YOU/YOURNAMEHERE.
where can I get some of those plates piss out cops people on earth
Whaa? But I have a warrant for my arrest, do I still have to go to court? (traffic related, I am not under the contract with the dmv, so they trying to pin me with no license, running red light, no insurance, running stop light)
Jeffrey Angel ,
freedomfromgovernment.org
Study , you need to know what you are doing good enough to explain it to idiots .
My car is my profile pic
Young Shrine PERSONS go to court to be prosecuted for profit . without any human rights or freedoms . (period) and if you/YOU/YOURNAMEHERE does not know any better , and has no idea how to be and prove you are able enough to "Be a Man" / prove you're human , than a slave/PERSONS you will remain . You / YOU need to learn the difference . And DON'T let separatists talk you in to "sovereign citizens" . That is just ridicules.
and look in to getting a "Verified record of birth" A.K.A a Long Form Birth Certificate (not a birth certificate)
Thy Horror SO should I give them an affadavit of truth?
In Australia the court clerk demands your name before going into the court room. All corrupt
Everyone has the right to remain silent. The devil hast to get your voluntary consent.
Update: Nope. The method does not work. If a defendant refuses to enter a plea or if a defendant organization fails to appear, the court must enter a plea of not guilty.
@@thefirm9746 - actually if not a single word comes out of your mouth, the magi will dismiss the case before he asks how you plead.
@@goldrushpro Not true at all. The rules specifically provide otherwise. I've seen idiots try this many times, and literally not one succeeded. And when I sat as a judge pro tem, it didn't work with me, either.
Even if you have no experience, just use common sense. If this worked, everyone would do it and anyone could commit any crime they wanted without consequence.
@@thefirm9746 - it doesn't work on crimes.
That's a totally different court and I know you know that.
@@goldrushpro This video is entitled "Win Every Criminal Case From Now On!"
And if we weren't talking about crimes, we wouldn't be worrying about how to plead. You don't plead in a civil case.
yea not in louisiana
where I live they read all the names on all the tickets that day to be heard. They read them 2 times in the morning, then 2 times at lunch...if your 'not there' they find you guilty and put a warrant out on you
Lindsay Truempy right..thats whats conflicting with me. What happens after you are there and they call your name in the calender and u say what hes talking about saying..your there but not there..i mean i dont want to make it worse
where I live they will stick you in the jury box with handcuffs..make you wait all day till 5pm...send you across the street to the jail until a doctor can be gotten [about 3 days later] to see if your nuts..off to the 5th floor you go till the next court date and you'll have the jail cell, the food, the doctor, the hospital, the transport cost all to pay for
I have gotten 3 tickets in my life. The 1st I went to driving school..the 2nd when ask to plea I said I don't plead to anything because there is no witness against me [the cop wasn't there] the 3rd time I proved the cop was wrong I had insurance
The idea being the Affidavit proving you were there. I wouldn’t try it myself
What if you walk in the courtroom and suddenly become confused and can't remember who you are.....because of your amnesia issues......................................
not sure who I am. ........ ............................
..
.......................
I went in for a bs traffic ticket and decided to run some game up in that court.... I told them that my name wasn't John Joe but John of the the Doe family. they just resquedualed me for about two month in a row so I decided to claim the name and set up to a court date. Told the judge I didn't consent to the processing. she got furious and kicked me out of the court. then a guard came out and told me it was dismissed. that process didn't work in the last court I was in tho
You never know what will happen. Different judges, different outcomes.
Clearfield doctrine makes it clear that it's a corporation appearance. So your honor, I require the prosecution's commercial indemnity bond put in record evidence file.
It's a commercial not a living being. So who owns the commercial entity and that is who is responsible. End of matter.
I guess you have to say "The Magic Words" correctly ! :>))
Truth is not magic, it's the opposite
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
when you get a citation. When you mail it in on the same letter plea not guilty on paper through the mail. You just saved 250.00 arraignment fee. Send the letter to the judge, prosecutor, clerk, chief of police, and clerk. If you live further than 50 miles from the court you can do all your court through the mail. Make them do paper work, make them go out of their relm.
What if you’ve plead already at arraignment can you still use right of subrogation at trial or at any point afterwards?
Go check out alphonse faggiolo
Recind
If, for whatever the reason, this guy wasn't able to help his own son with his legal issues, what are the chances that his advice would work for you?
Cases are not won by using law but rather by using the color of law and whom ever presents the best case will win.
Pay very close attention to the time frame of 3:40 and up
Mr. Nobody what do you mean?
I don't know what Huckleberry town this was, but try this in Riverside California... You would be arrested, and as you "resisted" , "tried to bite", "threatened to kill them".... Oh trust me, you will have done everything they say you did... And once your locked in there loony jail you won't leave until you say the words they want. Then your original "expired tags or license" ticket will sound great...
They need you to give it to them
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
How can I get a hold of this person I have a court date
Frank, are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
Look up Karl Lentz common law i use his way in the uk and it works a treat just keep things simple and short
Sovereign citizens actually believe this crap. This dumb shit will get you thrown in jail for sure.
He sounds very much like Karl Lentz! The patter is almost identical, and equally as vague. Many cases are heard, tried and decided in absentia. Happens all the time. Where's the evidence that this works? Case numbers, courts and dates? Without that it's what they call - hearsay.
good information... very good information but I'm not spending money just to talk for 15 mins about something that can be looked up easily. like I said very good information but people shouldn't have to pay to be enlightened
EXACTLY! You want me to answer your question/s with my years of experience, you need to compensate me. My time is valuable. What do you do for a living? Are you compensated for your work?
Wouldn't this be considered activism though? Are activists compensated for their activism? Or do they do it for a good cause?
larry benton
@Freedom from Government You took the time to respond to his post. Are you now going to send him an invoice????
Truth is not something that you should be putting a dollar value on. I'm offended that you would post this response at all. As it stands here, you're just acting as another member of that secret society known as the Law Society.
"Truth is not something that you should be putting a dollar value on"
With that rationale then anyone who gives advice (truth) on any topic should (according to you) have to work for free. If you want to find your solution yourself that is perfectly fine with me, but if you would like to tap in to my years of experience and avoid a bunch of pitfalls and other traps then you may find it in your best interests to schedule a consultation with me. I have been doing this for around 30 years now, and I also bill at $135 an hour to troubleshoot computer problems, so don't give me this crap about "truth should be free".
Truth is free, my time and expertise is not.
"Let every one employ himself in what he knows."
"He at whose risk a thing is done, should receive the profits arising from it."
For municipal court it's very easy...Just do not plead and make them answer this question. Is this a civil matter or criminal matter? And say you need to know because proceedings are different between the two of them. They can not say criminal because they do not offer a jury trial so if they say criminal they will be admitting that they are violating your rights so they definitely won't say criminal. When they say civil then you just make a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdictions because civil matters are held in the county courthouse not municipal court. And even better yet..besides civil court being held in the county courthouse... You must get served in a civil case...it must be handed to you or someone else has to take it on your behalf. You can not just mail it...its called the service of process...and after serving someone then proof of service must be filed by the server to the court to confirm that they did serve the defendant... And what many people don't know because they have never filed a civil suit themselves is that on the paperwork when you file the complaint there is a box to check if you want the case to be heard by a jury.. So in a civil case it's the opposite of a criminal case where the plaintiff decides if they want a jury to hear the case.. Not many people know that.
METO U hmmm so according to you , "municipal courts" CANNOT hear neither Civil cases NOR criminal cases 🤔 so WHY are the Municipal courts even there ??? Lol fyi Municipal courts hear Small civil cases where the controversy doesn't exceed $15,000 and also function as PRE-LIM courts for Criminal cases !!!! Go research about the topic if you don't know, but I guess you Research comes from the Dumbfuck SovCit websites 😂
What about a DUI? They didn't pull me over. They showed up later at my house and gave me a breathalyzer.
I think just saying your the authorized representative for that legal fiction and only here to balance the equities. I'll come up but I'm bringing the land with me. Admirlaty law is on the sea. The Judge should know he has no jurisdiction on the land. One woman used this and the judge wouldn't even allow her to approach. Case dismissed. No affidavit needed.
I got my brother out of a ticket without even having to go to court. We were coming back from a job we did and his cell phone rang and he made the mistake of answering it while he was driving. The officer was nice and I was nice back. I told him, were coming in to fight this, not because he didn't violate the law by being on his phone but because I told him I had just read the entire law on that subject the day before and the only thing it says was your 1st violation is 20 dollars. No where in the entire body of that particular law does it say you can add county fees, city fees, court fees, and any other fees to that 20 dollars and I'm bringing in the entire body of that law with us when we come to court. The officer must of just ripped up the ticket after we left because when we went to court, he wasn't even on the docket. The officer probably didn't want the hassle of coming in when I knew the law.
There's more than one way to skin a cat.
Jeff Pansini it is possible that you might avoid the penalty for a minor crime by appearing to be mentally challenged and too much effort to deal with. It's not something I would be proud of.
Btw the rule against answering the phone isn't to make money for the court but to stop idiots running over children.
The court doesn't care about children, quit lyin.
Your Honor, that man is present in this court room here today at this time, so will the prosecutor please identify the accused for the the record as that is not our burden.
*CLASSY CHECKMATE*
🎯👀✅
If I give you my name, you will use it and I won't have one, I talked myself out of a jaywalking ticket, by giving the definition of society and statute, I was then victim of terroristic threats, operating under duress I was extorted to give information against myself which my servant attempted to contractually rape me with that information, I refused to agree I was "in the state of" or "in United States" denying jurisdiction, he then instead of running my name over the radio he used his cell phone, after couple minutes he come back with a completely different attitude, he was being very nice and respectful to me and gave me a warning
It's jaywalking, not a triple murder.
This is insanity
If you refuse to identify in court the judge will rule you failed to appear and issue a bench warrant for your arrest.
That's what the affidavit is for. That someone was there for your case. They can't prove that you weren't if you don't give them your name
@@poncethegayboi Um... yes they can. If you don't give your name that means you did not appear.
@@poncethegayboiwhat is an affidavit? How do i get one
@theadl3681 😂😂😂 you make one
@@Moneyman-lx3nw care to elaborate?
I was arrested for drunk in public. I spent 3 days in jail before I could bail out. Now I have to go to court to "settle" the case. How do I get my bail money back and have it stricken from the record?
Does this include child support
Child Support is one of the biggest scams our "government" has perpetuated against men. There are video here on YT that explain it in detail. Do a search.
NO! you will get a default judgment against you, awarded to the plaintiff. Child support is a Civil case not criminal
They need you to play their game (legal game) if you don't play, then there is no game...
The way to win is to not play...that's why it's called a COURT room... the "court" is a game room...
They can't force you to play...they need your consent, which almost everyone gives away without objection...
GAME OVER BEFORE IT STARTED!
Are you okay with emailing me? I want to talk about something privately, but if you’re uncomfortable with emailing, I have a NON-email option you can consider.
If you do not identify yourself in court then the judge will promptly issue a warrant for your arrest. So doesn't this technique make matters worse?
Ric Cohen right..i damn show dont want that..
Ric Cohen did you not hear the whole video? Play it again over and over because he addressed that
what did he say about if you get a arrest warrent to send to the court a notice of afidavid?
how can we learn more?
Try using Google.
banhuevos Marc Stevens and eternally aware and a few more on UA-cam
I have a friend who is a expert subject matter on this. He's not available right now due to the fact that he's in jail....lol.
Jails are full of foolish people who take this tactic. Literally everything this guy says is wrong. Absolutely wrong.
you don't need a driver's license
the us supreme court said you do not need a driver's license
Did you read the whole case or just the part where the judge said you didn't need a drivers license. I just read the whole decision from the case Thompson v. Smith, 155 Va. 367 - Va: Supreme Court 1930 (available via Google Scholar). To put it simply without downloading the whole decision. "In other words, the court held that although the use of public roads is a right which citizens enjoy, local authorities may nonetheless regulate such use (including imposing a requirement that motor vehicle operators obtain licenses) so long as such regulations are reasonable, not arbitrary, and apply equally to everyone." David read the one thing people don't do today, they only see the part they want to see.
Don’t know what state your in but check out surrendering your license
On the state DOT website where you are located it is pretty simple
Then follow through with the other
things they have made available for one who seeks to be free be free
And do not fall prey to the scandalous contracts the ptb illegally engage and bind the unwitting into being a ward too so that they can legally rape and pillage your estate
thank you and God Bless you yours and all you touch
You don't need a driver's license you cannot issue a driver's license what on something that's already a right it just can't be done fishing license hunting license gun license driver's license any kind of license you cannot give a license to somebody that's already have it right
RevRSleeker
You would rather live as slaves and give up your freedom without a fight. That's why Americas "liberty" shrinks everyday.
David Hamlin you only need one if you plan to operate a self propelled machine on a public road.
Your information is incorrect. The courts have ruled that you do need one.
Perhaps you can cite the actual court case you are referring to.
How do you go about getting an affidavit???
Dude Get Speech Therapy!
I got arrest for traveling Private Plates and told them everything they have no Right
How or where do I obtain that "Private" plate?
Barry&Dee World hell yeah thats what i need to know lmao
I seen his video, and the guy made it himself.
They just entered Failure to Appear for me missing "Jury Trial" .. smh i dont knwo where to start .. rescind signatures or motion to dismiss with prejudice on grounds of lack of judication
Once I went to court for running a red light.
This was back before I knew any law. My
case stated was that there were NO cars
and the light was taking too damn long &
so I proceeded (ran it). Case dismissed
and I was free to go but not before a PIG
lecture on "safety" first from the high and
might self righteous Loser judge LMAO:)
ua-cam.com/video/G2S71sA2F8Y/v-deo.html
i don't understand. ..what happens when the judge says im ordering you to stay and then you say let the record reflect. ...then what?? can you clarify please? ?
This all works assuming 1. The court is a court of record or recording anything. In many cases the court has the microphones on and the lights on for "the Show". and 2. There is such a thing as an honest judge. Where I live the only "honest" looking judges are on after the other court shows. The method involves a process that will get most people held in contempt and tossed in jail! Wear them down and piss them off. Not cool at all. I have traveled all over in my car, no state plates and most importantly no stops or drama. Those plates are like shooting the finger at every cop as you pass them, armed with nothing. There is a much better way and it starts with proper public NOTICE.
Who and what roles and ENTITIES do you address this public notice to?
and what is to be covered in this public notice?
What's the process for this?
Hey it's Rick Shramm!
Do you have the full audio series?
Ironically lost the audio in a police raid of my home...
To understand the new world order and governments and the legal system you need to study the King James Bible and research the history of Nimrod and Semiramis and Tammuz and Mystery Babylon and theosophy and the Hegelian dialectic system.
or the Sumerian tablets where every one got that stuff from .
Why can't you just tell him that your the authorized representative and secured party creditor for that corporate fiction and your bringing the land with you?
this is what I done in criminal court for attempted burglary .judge asked my name I stated John doe and I do not agree to inter any contract or be bonded to this court's proceedings .my case was dismissed .did you all so know district attorney prosicuter office judges .and yes wall Mart are the biggest Byers of junk bonds . they consist of criminal convictions in a court room the more people found guilty the more they proffit from .now I ask you this question why would Wal-Mart one of the biggest Byers of junk bonds bye junk bonds .for criminal convictions
Because Walmart ceo's are criminals, and the entire company treats its employees like they have no Rights, no say so on any matter. Dictatorship. Any possible way to make money at others' expense.
LOL No, you weren't. You people posting this bs should be kicked in the head for lying like this.
Duane Anderson A good tip is not to be a thief in the first place. I think the Muslims have the right idea here with cutting one hand off.
Your actual story is gibberish.
Panikos Of Grays here's a better tip I wasn't guilty of nothing just walking my dog and got arrested .but u go on thinking everyone is a thief .and cops don't look to fuck with innocent people . so don't be so judgmental with out the facts .you have a blessed day okay
Duanethattard You've done nothing, other than crynig like a little bitch, with your made up story. You were not charged with burglary and had it dimsissed because your bullshit claims. You morons and the spreading of such bs is why you people are so stupid.I know the law, and how ti works. You don't get a chrge dismissed by doing what you claimed. Welcome to reality. Keep crying, bitch boy
The easiest way to get out of trouble is to say you forgot that it was against the law
I’m just gonna get Montana registration instead. $87.50 and I have registration for the rest of my life.
How do you enter the Affidavit into the court?? Should you do it in court or go to the clerk of court??
People - it's not about being right about the law - you are dealing with pirates who want to be seen as doves. Don't underestimate what can be accomplished by simply embarrassing them by exposing their lack of understanding of their own rules...
I don't care who does not believe because I won my case in Jacksonville FL challenging subject matter jurisdiction and venue and not contracting with the court or the jurisdiction thare of I can say it works because it did for me but everyone has thare own remedy u have too find the one u can remember and like using
Good for you, Tequisha, your blow against the tyrants helps all of humanity!
Okay none of this in ANY of these Videos about beating Court Cases make any sense...if a warrant is put out for you then you will LOOSE YOUR FREEDOM. Go TO Jail....The Point Of Beating the System,The Reason For Fighting For Your RIGHTS IS SO YOU DONT GET LOCKED UP... You did not win Anything
Your legal skills are amazing! Doing seminars too, are ya?
Trent's sock accounts claim he's amazing as that is what he thinks of HIMself lol Trent has no legal skills et al and not evidence of any of his own cases that have prevailed using his own BS website for the guilty to prevail as only a GOoD lawyer can get the guilty set free. lol
i guess I'll just walk either way along side the freeway, not sure if I should go to Ione, San Diego, or Chico. Thanks for the senseless feelings.