Right to Travel Marion County, Oregon MUST SEE!!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 вер 2024
  • You never know what is going to happen until it happens! The man who sent me this video says that they do not bother him or his wife anymore. All you have to do is know your stuff and stand your ground and you too can travel in your car away from 6 cops like this guy did! Please go and sub to his channel!
    Original video: • Marion County egregiou...
    Visit shop.freedomfro... to get the awesome travel tools used in this video!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @erikhawes5489
    @erikhawes5489 2 роки тому +51

    You have to have a valid driver's license to drive in the United States.

    • @TrentGoodbaudy
      @TrentGoodbaudy  2 роки тому +42

      That is not in dispute here. I agree with you I don't want any unlicensed drivers out on the roads.

    • @erikhawes5489
      @erikhawes5489 2 роки тому +10

      @@TrentGoodbaudy I don't understand what his grounds for not showing his drivers license.

    • @TrentGoodbaudy
      @TrentGoodbaudy  2 роки тому +107

      @@erikhawes5489 why would you need to show a drivers license if you are not acting in the capacity of a driver transporting persons or cargo for hire? It is not smart to contract away your God given inherent right to travel by applying for a drivers license privilege unless you are planning on participating in commerce. Privileges can be taken away, rights can't. That is why this guy with a suspended license got to use his car to leave. Have you ever read the 4th amendment? Google it right now.

    • @erikhawes5489
      @erikhawes5489 2 роки тому +21

      @@TrentGoodbaudy because it's a state law in Oregon that every person driving on a public road must have and provide a driver's license. Respect the state or don't visit. We, the people of Oregon, elected officials to keep us safe. We don't want our law enforcement powerless against criminals.

    • @TrentGoodbaudy
      @TrentGoodbaudy  2 роки тому +97

      @@erikhawes5489 was he transporting persons or cargo for hire? If he wasn't getting paid to be behind the wheel he wasn't driving. Prove me wrong. The state can ONLY regulate commerce. It can't make laws against me moving my body or private property with a machine, it would violate my rights. The Amish have won this argument many times. Just because they don't usually use cars doesn't mean that they don't have a right to use the roads without begging government. You feel free to apply with the state to drive and trade your natural, inherent, God-given, constitutional right to liberty for a privilege that can be taken away that is your choice to make, but don't try to tell me that using a machine to move my body on a public thoroughfare without begging for permission is against the "law" because it isn't. It is a classic case of government overreach and it is time for the trafficking of free people to end.

  • @TheHANDLEYMAN
    @TheHANDLEYMAN 2 роки тому +49

    This is what it takes to get our freedom back

    • @UnrealNarcissist
      @UnrealNarcissist 3 місяці тому

      You are not free to operate a self-propelled conveyance on our public roads without a license, registration and insurance.
      I understand you want your freedom to do whatever you want, well move to a place where the sovereign "We the People" does not require such.

    • @nicholasfink6170
      @nicholasfink6170 2 місяці тому +1

      What is government a dictator a religion or a cult or a slave master or a union or a corporation ?

    • @UnrealNarcissist
      @UnrealNarcissist 2 місяці тому

      @@nicholasfink6170 a government is in this case an elected body of people, charge by the true Sovereign of this nation, We the People to organize under our federal and state constitution to create laws, execute laws ands adjudicate laws equally for all. By virtue of your presence on our soil you have consented to be subject to our laws ands jurisdiction and failures may result in fines or incarceration. You are free to stay or leave in which case you no longer owe obedience to the sovereign. This is not rocket science. A government is not a corporation, certainly not in this country. A government entity may be considered a corporation for limited purposes but alas that has confused some foolish people to conclude that it is only a corporation. Religion is a belief in one or more deities to whom we owe obedience and while people in a government may be religious, it is not a requirement under our constitution which serves to separate state and church power our constitution. While religious organizations may allow or disallow membership, in most cases you’re free to leave. Also, religions may have tribunals which may address violations of their canons. Of course these Religions have no power over those outside their membership and only serve by mutual consent. In your case, you have consented to the jurisdiction of the government by residing within its territory and if you consider that unfair, a dictator, a religion or whatever else, that’s just your silly belief. All that matters is that you are free to leave or when you stay you will abide by our rules. Just like when you reside in someone’s home. Since we can however not evict you from our nation in most cases, you will face monetary penalties or incarceration in accordance with the powers granted to our government and with your implicit consent as you reside on our soil.

  • @Danwilsey
    @Danwilsey 2 роки тому +195

    If everyone would take this action immediately, I believe we could start getting a few of our God given rights back & start to turn this around.

    • @jeremy072579
      @jeremy072579 2 роки тому +20

      And put the Division of Motor Vehicles, Inc. out of business.

    • @jackstiles458
      @jackstiles458 2 роки тому +4

      @@jeremy072579 how can a legal entity claim to own something other than what it can only "issue" for the use of, by law? Departments and Agencies of government will not surrender or "issue" liability. "Claim to own nothing control everything."

    • @keekee3385
      @keekee3385 2 роки тому +6

      Right! If look up the definition of the United States= It's a corporation not a country!!!!!! And how is the United States called Amerikkka too??🤔🤔

    • @michaelblake2280
      @michaelblake2280 2 роки тому

      stop saying god gave these rights. god did not do anything. men writes laws clown!!

    • @ia7277
      @ia7277 2 роки тому +1

      One reply deleted out of four.

  • @matthewridgeway9250
    @matthewridgeway9250 2 роки тому +12

    Intimidation through threat of property damage. Awesome bandits.

  • @doglatin8763
    @doglatin8763 2 роки тому +38

    The cop says in the state OF Colorado you have to produce your driver's license.
    I don't care what the CORPORATE state of Colorado says, I don't work for it!

    • @gamersanonymous4me131
      @gamersanonymous4me131 2 роки тому +5

      Ask the cop for the definitons of the terms he is using "silence equates to fraud if you have a moral duty to speak (court decision). What is a driver, what is a motor vehicle, they cant answer these questions and if you are using terms that you dont know the defintion of then you are incompetent to tesify and your testimony is null and void. Does he work for the State of Colorado? Yes, when did you meet or talk to the State of Colorado last? The State of Colorado is your imaginary friend right?

    • @doglatin8763
      @doglatin8763 2 роки тому +9

      @@gamersanonymous4me131
      You're right...the state of whatever is fiction/The Matrix and only exists in your mind.

    • @anotherworldviewispossible
      @anotherworldviewispossible 2 роки тому +1

      @@gamersanonymous4me131 That ruling about silence is a good catch. Thanks for that.
      In Court, the Cop will just rattle off the "legal" definition of those terms, from the Code, and argue that it all applies to you. But under your Evidence Code, the Court takes Judicial Notice of the Federal Law - which has its own definitions - upon which you can rely, while Traveling. If you can get State (STATE) Employees to actually fall silent - then you'll know that you've done the job. And in a Court of Record - you could use the fact of their default or non prosequitur to your advantage. The problem is getting to one of those.

    • @exposeevil5492
      @exposeevil5492 2 роки тому

      @@darrene.vonbraun4421 invalid? You more on they cite common law works in the dictionaries. They cite Blackstone's commentaries and Edward Coke's common law works. Lmbo nice try!

    • @exposeevil5492
      @exposeevil5492 2 роки тому +1

      @@randycraft3166 You are the definition of lost!

  • @EdHotin
    @EdHotin Рік тому +26

    “I’m suggesting that you do not drive but you’re free to go”. Now that says everything right there.

    • @jimgalle1371
      @jimgalle1371 9 місяців тому +3

      define DRIVE

    • @Davidsmith-uu4bl
      @Davidsmith-uu4bl 7 місяців тому +2

      The United States is a federal corporation not a country , but people don't know that

    • @Davidsmith-uu4bl
      @Davidsmith-uu4bl 7 місяців тому +1

      Are you a u s. Citizen ? Or one of the people of the republic united stares of America ? 2 completely different .1 a corporation established in 1871 where you have no rights the other is a county established in 1776 where you have right that can't be taken a way modified or changed in anyway .so where do you live ? It's not what you been told

    • @Davidsmith-uu4bl
      @Davidsmith-uu4bl 7 місяців тому +2

      Is it the state of Ohio or Ohio state big difference in the 2

    • @Davidsmith-uu4bl
      @Davidsmith-uu4bl 7 місяців тому

      What flag is in court room ? Does it have 3 or 4 colors 4 I bet red white a blue with gold or yellow f4ing on 3 sides that's the flag of the corporation that you a a slave to called the United states

  • @BloodTar
    @BloodTar 2 роки тому +60

    *PLEADING* is something you do in court. You tell an officer that you're *INVOKING* your 5th Amendment right to remain silent/not self-incriminate.

    • @WayTruthLife2100
      @WayTruthLife2100 2 роки тому +6

      I had not heard this before. I appreciate you taking the time to clarify the two options.

    • @OOspazOO
      @OOspazOO Рік тому +3

      Wrong. Speaking legalese is something you do in court. Having an interaction with the police out in public is not a courtroom, like you correctly state and you are in no way obligated to speak in such a precise way. Whether the gentleman says pleading, invoking, using, or anther simile hardly matters. what matters is intent and mutual understanding. Because, no judge or jury in the land would rule in favor of someone arguing something like 'welp, the driver said pleading instead of invoking so when the officer forced him to incriminate himself it doesn't count.'

    • @BloodTar
      @BloodTar Рік тому +6

      @@OOspazOO I'm referring to using correct English and grammar__using correct words when one speaks. Yes, I'm playing the part of the 'Grammar Police.'

    • @AECRADIO1
      @AECRADIO1 Рік тому

      ODD HOW UNCONSTITUTIONAL EMPLOYEES BELIEVE THEY ARE OUR MASTER!
      WHERE DOES THE CONSTITUTION STATE THIS?

    • @lukekoleas3378
      @lukekoleas3378 Рік тому

      God Wins. Fatality.

  • @kenlane9402
    @kenlane9402 2 роки тому +77

    My two cents .. when a cop lights you up, immediately turn on your emergency flashers, so you can explain that you weren't running, but looking for a safe place to pull over. Then go to the next safe exit or parking lot for both you AND the cops safety. Then you can say it was for his safety.

    • @bluesky6985
      @bluesky6985 2 роки тому +15

      Try and find private property so your theft case is easier to prove

    • @miman-ck9jv
      @miman-ck9jv 2 роки тому +5

      👍😁

    • @nancy8219
      @nancy8219 2 роки тому +11

      good Patriot advice that's what we need to see it's us against them there are more of us we can win this it's going to take a little time and a lot of effort and a lot of b******* but in the long run we're going to be free'er then we've ever been before in our lives and our children are going to know things we never knew we are strong enough we can do this we stay strong for all the b******* in the world please please stay strong for true freedom it'll be better than we ever dreamed

    • @noblephoenix6151
      @noblephoenix6151 2 роки тому +5

      It's actually "illega", in most states, to have your emergency flashers on in a moving vehicle. Just fyi.

    • @caseykelso1
      @caseykelso1 2 роки тому +2

      ONLY IF YOUR RECORDING AND DICTATE THAT INTO YOUR PHONE.

  • @pd2468
    @pd2468 2 роки тому +46

    See that’s what’s matter with this country when the citizens learn their rights law enforcement doesn’t like it because their revenue goes right out the window

    • @juspete5527
      @juspete5527 2 роки тому +1

      Citizens dont have right but only privileges. Look into the 14th amendment.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      You do realize that everything the driver is saying to the police is not only wrong but also made-up nonsense?

    • @jreavestheleader8255
      @jreavestheleader8255 Рік тому

      @@juspete5527 yea that’s cuz they changed it

  • @scottmatznick3140
    @scottmatznick3140 2 роки тому +111

    The gall of the cop to say "I'm honestly just trying to get home safe" to excuse accosting a man who is just trying to get home safe.

    • @sasquatch2753
      @sasquatch2753 2 роки тому +4

      Hmmmm interesting how the TRAVELLER states innthenlast 30 seconds of clip after told free to go, When talking to his mom he is DRIVING home not travelling. By his own admission he is DRIVING not travelling and therefore liable to pay all fines.

    • @Joe-mad
      @Joe-mad 2 роки тому +9

      @@sasquatch2753 who cares? All that matters is how the word is defined when it comes to the law. Why don’t you look it up, it’s very clear. Blacks law dictionary is where you’ll find it.

    • @saiamun3607
      @saiamun3607 2 роки тому +10

      @@sasquatch2753 his mom isn't a extortionists collection agent either, so there's that huge important nugget

    • @douglashoward9616
      @douglashoward9616 2 роки тому +3

      But the knight is taught his life is more important than all of ours.

    • @douglashoward9616
      @douglashoward9616 2 роки тому +3

      @@sasquatch2753 the word driving has been declared not owned by commerce. But the word Motorvehicle is as apposed to automobile.

  • @jw2691
    @jw2691 2 роки тому +25

    Emergency lights are only supposed to be used during emergency

    • @kristiblack1428
      @kristiblack1428 2 роки тому +4

      Very 1st thing to ask (as-king): Where's and/or what is the emergency officer? 🤔

    • @dieselscornerandthefurfami3365
      @dieselscornerandthefurfami3365 2 роки тому +5

      Yep they just committed a felony pulling you over for a non emergency .

  • @eugenevanloggerenberg1889
    @eugenevanloggerenberg1889 2 роки тому +32

    This is the first time I've heard anyone asking the the man in the suite "what is your bond no". This is crucial, establishing the fact that they are operating statutes and act as the corporate vehicle without a valid license/bond to do so.
    Now if the matter goes to court, you can claim against the men/women wearing the suite in the private capacity. If you learn THEIR legal code, then you can hold them accountable. You never derive rights from THEIR code. Their code is only applicable to them and hold them accountable.
    Would like to see more people do this but as the very first step. The very first question you should ask is, do you have publuc liability bonding cover and is it current and up to date?

    • @locus2639
      @locus2639 2 роки тому +2

      interesting ill read up on that

    • @MrInformYou
      @MrInformYou 2 роки тому +1

      Right on... Watch my full video

    • @MrInformYou
      @MrInformYou 2 роки тому

      @@locus2639 Yes, do just that.

    • @locus2639
      @locus2639 2 роки тому

      @@MrInformYou i would like to,could you send me a link?

    • @MrInformYou
      @MrInformYou 2 роки тому

      @@locus2639 just click on my avatar

  • @MaranathaMetal
    @MaranathaMetal 2 роки тому +14

    Man these revenue collectors really need to find a real job. Mcdonalds is always hiring.

  • @gamersanonymous4me131
    @gamersanonymous4me131 2 роки тому +42

    In California you can file a form 142 (at least I did a decade ago) and revoke, recind and terminate the Drivers license, the DMV will send confirmation of your election to terminate the license. IF you dont do this they will place a DL in suspension and think its still a contract (even though it isn't) but I heard dispatch talking to the cop that pulled me over after the revocation and she said "he voluntarily revoked the license (so not in suspension). In Cali you have to re apply for a new license every 5 years but... even if you dont reapply they record the license as being in suspension, so... do the revocation, so they cant claim its in suspension. The veh code in Cali states that the "retention and possession of the DL makes the holder liable for compliance with all the Veh codes.
    I would carry a couple of doc.x that state you are a state national per !NA (congressional Immagration and Naturalization Act) section 101, (a) 21 lists the status as a "person who allegiance to a state" instead of (a) 22 which states a person who allegiance to the United States or is a United States person. A B.C. from a state gives you that status if you claim it. But....be wary as most states are currently subsidiaries of the U.S. so I make it clear that the state I have allegiance to is The State of California accepted by Congress on September 9th 1850, so its California (1850) and just putting the year in is enough to ID the state as not the STATE OF CALIFORNA with its fake 1879 Constitution (made after the civil war). All states have re done their Constitutions after the Civil war to be "inseparate from the Untied States of America" which language does not exist in the 1850 Constitution. I can prove that I am not a 14th amendment U.S. citizen because the 3 elements required cannot be met by me : 1) I am not a statutory "person", 2) I was not born in the U.S. as geographically it is the land known as Washington D.C. shown on multiple definitions in code and UCC, and 3) I am not subject to the U.S. Congress jurisdiction (Scotus decisions prove this along with Art., sec. 8 cl 17 of the Fed Constitution.
    I put in the definitions of driver and motor vehicle showing they are 'for hire" terms and state that the officer will be "knowingly putting in false infomation on his report or accusatory instrument (ticket) which is a misdemeanor Penal code 118.1 punishable by 1, 2, or 3 years in jail as he is now aware of the correct definition of those terms and if he did not have any factual evidence I was 'for hire" at the time of the unlawful arrest (detention, siezing, arrest and custody are all denials of the right to liberty look up Blacks law 4th, definition of arrest). And show the Department of Justices own website notice of 18 USC 242 : www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law print the DOJs page and state that the officer is violating the 4th amendment by siezing you without a warrant based upon probable cause that you committed a crime. IF they take your property (car) then it is a denial of the 6th amendment (due process) because due process requires at minimum a notice and opportunity to disput the taking in court and you never recieved any notice (and notice is not given at the traffic stop and if they claim it is then they are taking the property without your opportuntiy to dispute it in a court before the taking. Actually impounds are under civil asset forfeiture and are in rem proceedings in Admiralty and no state can opperate in Admiralty on the Federal government can invoke Admiralty and its only for acts committed at sea and not for acts commited on land.

    • @Dat_Sun
      @Dat_Sun 2 роки тому +9

      I voluntarily surrendered my driver's license in the state of Kentucky 1999. No longer contracted with the state.

    • @EYESLAPJEWS
      @EYESLAPJEWS 2 роки тому +8

      Great info brother that's what I've been telling people is to surrender their driver's license revoke the contract

    • @twatdidusay304
      @twatdidusay304 2 роки тому +2

      How do I go about revoking my license?

    • @Dat_Sun
      @Dat_Sun 2 роки тому

      @@twatdidusay304 Take a number at the license branch. They will help you through the process.

    • @twatdidusay304
      @twatdidusay304 2 роки тому +2

      @@Dat_Sun cool, so I can just let them know what I want to do and they'll guide me through it? Nice! Thanks man👍😁!

  • @andrewgilblom1741
    @andrewgilblom1741 2 роки тому +42

    I give this young man a lot of credit, he knows his rights but needs to learn more about the law!! He's a brave young man to say the least!! The more he does this the better he will get for sure!! We ALL must take this seriously, I have been TRAVELING without their government demands since 1987!! I've learned a lot over the year's!! I have 4 set's of Trent's plates, I have botten two traveler's packages, well worth it guy's!! I have learned a lot from Trent for sure!! Safe travels EVERYONE.

    • @mightyweapon
      @mightyweapon 2 роки тому +9

      Statutes arent actually law is thats what your meaning. They are nothing more than rules of commerce. But if you mean that he was arguing tuen yes needs to learn more, as soon as you argue you are at war and acting in dishonor. The one in dishonor is the one in the wrong, best way is they ask a question you answer with asking a question that put them in dishonor or hints to them the crime they are committing.

    • @anotherworldviewispossible
      @anotherworldviewispossible 2 роки тому

      @@mightyweapon Rules of commerce = "PUBLIC Policy". Are you part of a "Body Corporate", or "Body Politic"..? If not, then "Public Policy" may be foreign to you, and the actual place, that you happen to live.

    • @kevinswinyer3176
      @kevinswinyer3176 2 роки тому +3

      @ Andrew Gilblom, how do I go about doing what you have been doing since 1987 ? Who do I need to send notice to, and in what way do I need to do it ? I drive commercially for a living, so I need to keep my CDL because of my job, but how do I go about deregistering my NON COMMERCIAL PRIVATELY OWNED METHOD OF CONVEYANCE with the Government ? Do I need to keep insurance once I deregister, or no ?

    • @anotherworldviewispossible
      @anotherworldviewispossible 2 роки тому +2

      @@kevinswinyer3176 That sounds like a fairly complex legal situation... I'm not sure who you'd want to go to for advice with that - or who would want to give it.
      So looking at this, big picture... it's time to get to know who and WHAT, your "Strawman" is. Is that you - or just some property..? Who owns it? If that's you, who owns it...and you're not the "US citizen" fictional entity ("transmitting utility") that it represents... Then you could conceivably use it to bring your RIGHT to earn a living - whether the STATE classifies that as a "privilege"/"benefit", or not.
      When you're just travelling freely, in your household goods - as we've seen in several videos...you can refuse to engage that fiction, in the manner that they would prefer.
      I know that it isn't Trent's thing - but declaring yourself as one of the people of your state, an "American National", or "Non-citizen National" in their terminology, to the Secretary of State, might be part of the way forward, for you.
      That, combined with Commercial Registry control over the "Strawman", and full knowledge of the related concepts, would likely be a decent way to proceed ...
      As to the Declaration to Antony Blinken - a guy named Roger Sayles seems to have that pretty well figured out - if you want to go that way. And he seems to like Trent's tags for your car, unlike Ms. Von Reits and her "Z" plates ...

    • @Dustin-yc4lx
      @Dustin-yc4lx Рік тому

      It's a fundamental right you will not find in the Constitution but the supreme Court upholds it

  • @JEHERETIC
    @JEHERETIC 2 роки тому +29

    My uncle was pulled over and told that because part of the license plate was blocked it was obstruction of state property, I told him he should return state property and get it off his truck

  • @trueamericanpatriots79
    @trueamericanpatriots79 2 роки тому +36

    "This is the bald one so he's probably gonna be extra hands on" - priceless lol

  • @Paygelove
    @Paygelove 2 роки тому +12

    They are just bullies. They don’t even know their OWN LAWS.

  • @HealingYouNow
    @HealingYouNow 2 роки тому +37

    Then they came armed and dangerous to instill fear. This is crazy.

  • @tkd4zgqg
    @tkd4zgqg 2 роки тому +39

    Yeah this is awesome that he stood up for his constitutional rights but we need to know what happened with the court appearance to complete this event.

    • @killercuddles7051
      @killercuddles7051 2 роки тому +6

      Exactly. I tried this. Ended up in court. Explained to the judge. He laughed and said, you can appeal it.
      I just paid the extortion fee. It was cheaper

    • @Paygelove
      @Paygelove 2 роки тому +9

      @@killercuddles7051 because you probably went and agree to being your strawman dude. You need to know how to follow up BEFORE you try it.

    • @MoeHawka
      @MoeHawka 2 роки тому +3

      The detective that contacted me about my complaint suddenly stopped talking to me. Then I got a letter saying my motion was denied without explanation (as expected). Then the pirates started avoiding me. They can do what they will so I'm not worried about what they do with their "driving" record

    • @killercuddles7051
      @killercuddles7051 2 роки тому

      @@Paygelove by answering a question in court?
      Idk man... I just pay the fees. Every single human I know has told me I'm wrong and discouraged me.

    • @seekndistroyjuggalonews
      @seekndistroyjuggalonews 2 роки тому +1

      The wrestler Val venis does it in Arizona and wins

  • @kenlane9402
    @kenlane9402 2 роки тому +12

    That would be perfect to have a loud speaker, and to be addressing your grievances with your government officials. While they are attempting to violate your rights. Then you could be engaged in a protest.

  • @JIBMONEY
    @JIBMONEY 2 роки тому +5

    I live in Oregon and all the police do here is violate the citizens rights. End qualified immunity from all public officials.

    • @Danwilsey
      @Danwilsey 2 роки тому

      Get rid of the commys

  • @djsdaddlimitededition9809
    @djsdaddlimitededition9809 2 роки тому +15

    What's wrong with natural law? You know the naturally instinctual law of nature that people don't have to go to school for half a lifetime to figure out.
    These guys want to hang their hats on the fact that some more cunning individual than they decided that it was ethical to violently demand papers and payment from innocent people who have no affiliation or obligation; instead of using their own brains and determining what is righteous and what is evil😞

  • @MaranathaMetal
    @MaranathaMetal 2 роки тому +17

    'Listen sir, I don't read or listen I just need you to be an obedient drone AND GIVE ME YOUR PAPERS NOW.' 'Dispatch he's exercising his right to remain silent instead of accepting gubment privileges! I need back up! 😫'

  • @trickmustang1994
    @trickmustang1994 Рік тому +4

    I no longer contract with the state. I have turned my driver's license, and tag back to the dmv and my social security number back as well. Cutting all ties with the state. I have been pulled over severtimes in the 8 years that i have done this. One time a few officers got hands on with me and i sued the city and won my law suit. It was enough that i retired 7 years early.

  • @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant
    @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant 2 роки тому +11

    "We got one they can see", I love the the
    " they live", reference

  • @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant
    @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant 2 роки тому +14

    It's actually illegal for someone to stop you from traveling while in a disguise.

    • @AECRADIO1
      @AECRADIO1 Рік тому +1

      IT IS A FEDERAL CRIME, ALSO.

  • @jamesalbright4666
    @jamesalbright4666 2 роки тому +3

    All I see is too many deputies endangering the roadways unnecessarily.

  • @HealingYouNow
    @HealingYouNow 2 роки тому +38

    Great job on showing others truth about the illegal laws.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 роки тому +5

      About the illegal Laws? Please read this: "America" is the name of a CONTINENT, where are 35 countries. Our Country doesn't even have a name. And the concept of: United States (US), describes a Model of Political Organization. US, is NOT a name. Anyway. Our Country is called “America”, cuz it is on the North American Continent. But the name "United States of America" is a Foreign Corporation located in a 10 mile piece of the North American Continent. The land it occupies was back before the Civil War part of two States inside of the so called "AMERICA", THE COUNTRY. They were Virginia State, and Maryland State. The "Act of 1871", took those parts and created the District of Columbia, a City State Country. One of only 3 in the WORLD! And now for the facts that can be looked up on line. Do you know that the UNITED STATES is not a Country? It is a Foreign Corporation. Located in the Foreign City State Country know as the District of Columbia! There are three such City State Countries. 1).- The VATICAN CITY, in Rome, Italy, but not a part of Rome, nor Italy, 2).- The CITY OF LONDON, in London, U.K., but not a part of London, nor the United Kingdom. 3).- The DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (D.C.), in North America, but not a part of any State in North America, nor the Country of “America”. You need to look this up, maybe you are claiming to be a U.S.A. citizen. For if you make that claim, U R saying that you are (then), are a citizen/employee/slave of the corporation who's on paper name when it was registered in the Foreign Country City State District of Columbia is in actuality the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION COMPANY INCORPORATED". And all of the States in North America the country that are "Incorporated", (that includes, Cities, Counties, and Corporations. Are all registered as such in the Foreign City State Country of the District of Columbia). This all took place when in 1871, when the Congress was looking for the money it needed to "RECONSTRUCT" America, after the war between the norther States of America called the Union, and the southern States of America , called Confederacy. They were both inside America Continent, what you call Country. At any rate the banker's would only finance “America”... IF the Congress would give the banker's some considerations. 1).- Take land, and give it to the banker's by forming a FOREIGN CITY STATE COUNTRY called the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, (the name didn't matter to the banker's as long as it was not still "USA" property). 2).- They must then form a corporation and register it as the "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION COMPANY INCORPORATED". The banker's demanded that this name must be the name used! (You will find out why later). So Congress did it! They knew they would get the money to Reconstruct. When they did this, they also knew that it was a treason against the Country, and the Citizens of North America to do so. So, to cover there treachery the bankers had this country America, USURPED by there corporation call the United States of America Corporation Company Incorporated in the foreign city state country of the District of Columbia. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in fact, is just there Corporation that runs the Country, from the FOREIGN COUNTRY the District of Columbia. And the reason it's registered name is U.S.A. CORPORATION COMPANY INCORPORATED is so that it can have franchises outside of there own Foreign land. For instance: In the country of "America" you have States. Florida State is one of them. The Foreign Corporation has a Company Incorporated in that State, but is not a part of that State, just like it is with the Vatican City not being part of Rome, nor Italy, there corporate franchise company in Florida is called the State of Florida. This is a Corporation registered in and for a FOREIGN CITY STATE COUNTRY, the District of Columbia. (For this reason, the State of Florida is NOT called the State; it is called REPUBLIC: The Republic of Florida). Well, this corporation registered It has nothing to do with "America" the Country nor the land mass of America the Continent. It is only a piece of paper in a filling cabinet in the Foreign Country the District of Columbia. The same goes for the Counties, Cities, and all the incorporated agencies. Like the police, jails, and court's in, but not a part of the country. They too have been USURPED by there corporation counter pats. Take notice: the Law of the Country "America" is COMMON LAW! Where the LAW of the CORPORATION U.S.A. CORPORATION is Admiralty Law of the Sea, COMMERCIAL LAW. Just when was the last time you appeared in a Common Law Court? NEVER! All the court's have been usurped in the country of North America by the FOREIGN CORPORATION IN THE COUNTRY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA'S counter parts. A place where JUSTICE, has been REPLACED by there corporation's JUST-US SYSTEM. And you my friend, are not a part of there "us", and nether are there CORPORATE citizen/employee/slave's!… And now, you know why they are fighting so hard to take away your guns! The Second Amendment to the first real Constitution was for the governing body, NOT FOR THE PEOPLE! It told the company/governing body what WE THE PEOPLE expected of them! They were given by we the people certain Rights! One that comes to mind, and has been changed for there benefit is the Right to regulate commerce. This in no way gave them ANY RIGHT TO REGULATE ANYTHING ELSE! Like taxes on WE THE PEOPLE! Nor Licenses for the people not conducting commerce! Corporation's citizens from doing so. Why? Cuz they are all Foreigner's on American Land. If American's go to the District of Columbia, they must follow the rules and regulations and statutes of that Foreign Country. (Amendment 14 Section 1 covered that, it also turned Corporations into People. So when they say “We The People”, That does not include us. Unless you are part of the Corporation or a special interest group within the Corporation. That Constitution was written for and by Masons, the Corporation, Special interest Groups. It was not written for the common people of America, or as they call us, “Non Essential”). This ends your lecture on the differences between the two DISTINCT AND DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, AND THERE CORPORATIONS. (And something extra to add: “Paying for your Driver Licensed is a "Privilege Tax" and nothing else. ALL we have the Right to TRAVEL. Travel is FREE. Now, Commerce Driving has to be Licensed, cuz in this case: "We Drive and not just Travel". We don't pay attention nor stand up for our Rights cuz someone of authority told us to do so. My authority says NO you have no Right to push me around with your authority that I didn't authorize in the first place. John Doe might be playing to be a President but, I am not authorized to obey him cuz he's a figure of so called “Authority”. Keep your power. Don't give it away to authority that only wants to control your every breath!. Rights do Not depend on the OPINIONS of other people. That is why they are called RIGHTS. We don't exercise them only when someone else gives permission). The End. I sure hope you have gained some wisdom from this lecture, and by all means look every bit of it up! You will be surprised by what you find here in Internet. You will never learned in CORPORATION SCHOOLS. In conclusion: There is no Country called AMERICA; there is a private Corporation called the United States of America. Now. It was necessary to add a couple of facts regarding your Country "America". (With the Pandemic I have a lot of time to search the web). Here we go: Did you know that your Country is the most indebted in the world? Astronomical quantities. Impossible to pay. Adding up all the debt of Latin America and Africa, it would only be one sixth of what “America” owes to the United States of America Corporation Company Incorporated (USA-Co. Inc. District of Columbia). Why? Cuz "America" does not have its own money; we do not OWN our money. The true and only owners of the dollar is the Federal Reserve, governed by appointed members, not elected nor supervised, since the Federal Reserve is NOT part of the Gov’t. and it is not "Federal" either. FedRes It is Cartel Bank, and part of the USA-Co .Inc. Your Country, my friend, exists within the fait accompli, but does not exist in formal legality or in compliance with International Law. Your country is made up of Independent Republics. Republic of Virginia; Republic of California; Rep. of Florida, or Tennessee, etc. With its own laws and flags and their legal shields. Even with their own money. Legally! (In the case of the Republic of Texas, they have their money legal tender and it is SILVER 99.9% purity). ALL Republics. United, yes, but NOT TO FORM a single Republic nor a Country. (For example the Right to have a Flag: All countries in the world are made up of States, Provinces or Counties, but NONE OF THEM has a Flag. Mexico, for example, is made up of 32 States but none has a flag. In the US, all the States of the Union have their own Flag, cuz they are "Republics"). And this is the reason why our nation does NOT have a name, but rather we have a Model of Political Organization, or a Political Status as a name: USA.

    • @mightyweapon
      @mightyweapon 2 роки тому +2

      Statutes areny laws! Theu are rules of commerce. Hence the legal aspect, not lawful. Hence the citations or infringements depending on countries, and not being crimes. If you commit a crime that is unlawful! If you get an Infrigements or citations that is illegal.

    • @douglashoward9616
      @douglashoward9616 2 роки тому +1

      @@salvadorvizcarra769 all of what you're saying being true. Your time lines are a little off. The district of Columbia was created in 1801. When the founders got together and declared. We give this land of Rome Maryland for if the federal government is allowed to own property outside this region. Property rights will cease to exist for the common man.
      Teddy Roosevelt ended that and in 1913 under wilson alodial titles to land were removed from the people. In 1871 the corporation the THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was created. And much more that wasn't written about.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 роки тому

      @@douglashoward9616 Here's a precision: According to Wikipedia: "The District of Columbia was founded on July 16, 1790, and in 1791 a new city called "Washington" was made official within the District, to the East of the already existing city of Georgetown..." Now: "In 1871, the Gov'ts of these two cities and the rest of the towns in the District were unified into a single entity call: "D. C." It was precisely in this year (1871), that the Bankers demanded to seize this territory in exchange for lending the money for the "Reconstruction of America", destroyed by almost 5 years of Civil War. In fact, did you know that the Capitol building was SOLD at one time to solve financial problems? It was able to be sold cuz the building does NOT belong to the country "USA"... Then, it was paid for, and the building was recovered again.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 роки тому

      @@douglashoward9616 And by the way Mr. Douglas Howard, the official Capital of the United States, is NOT Washington City. The official Capital of the United States is "THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA". And this urban sector is the only place where no US citizen can vote, and yet D.C., It has two representatives in the Congress of the Union. The Capitol Building was Mortgaged by President Andew Jackson, to Mr. Daniel Tromelin, (Dutch Banker, Amsterdam), for 10 years, and with that money Jackson resolved financial problems that CORRUPTION within the Government had caused.

  • @chuckiepeoples
    @chuckiepeoples 2 роки тому +4

    Strength in numbers. If the peasantry would just stand up against tyranny.

  • @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant
    @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant 2 роки тому +6

    Also, if you have insurance then you agreed to follow their commercial rules of the road.

    • @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant
      @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant 2 роки тому

      Also you didn't ask for your license to be revoked it's currently suspended.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      Not the "commercial" rules. Just the rules of the traffic laws.

    • @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant
      @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant Рік тому +1

      @@Colgate64 There is no such thing as traffic laws it's traffic acts or codes.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      @@ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant You are mistaken. Codes are simply a collection of laws. Federal laws are contained in the "United States Code".

    • @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant
      @ThinkingDoesMakeMeImportant Рік тому

      @@Colgate64 The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act was enacted in the United States in 1966 to empower the federal government to set and administer new safety standards for motor vehicles and road traffic safety.

  • @divisiveness3223
    @divisiveness3223 2 роки тому +4

    18:55 it’s like saying city ordinance trumps the constitution ;like Hitler’s orders Trump law and the constitution “I’m following orders” 🤡🤡🤡
    Last excuse in the book

  • @jw2691
    @jw2691 2 роки тому +5

    Tell them to read there own handbook

  • @anotherworldviewispossible
    @anotherworldviewispossible 2 роки тому +5

    16:09 Cop: 'I'll be able to hear you better (but still not actually listen) once you're in the back of my cruiser'.

  • @kevinswinyer3176
    @kevinswinyer3176 2 роки тому +12

    I counted at least 7, if not more felonies committed by Police in this Stop, and one misdemeanor. The first felony was when the first Police Officer activated his emergency lights. The only legal time they can legally activate their Emergency lights, and/or sirens is if, AND ONLY IF there is a LIFE, OR DEATH situation occuring. Traveling on the roads without Government Issued Tags or plates in a NON COMMERCIALLY USED PRIVATELY OWNED AUTOMOBILE IS NOT A LIFE, OR DEATH SITUATION. Then 5 more Armed Policy Enforcers also activated their lights as well, so there is 6 Felonies committed by these Armed Policy Enforcers, and Felony number 7 came when the one Armed Policy Enforcer threatened to break the Traveler's Window, and yank him out for not aiding the Armed Policy Enforcer's so called "Investigation" by refusing to provide his ID. Lying is a Misdemeanor during Traffic Stops, and the Armed Policy Enforcer blatantly lied to the traveler several times. These Armed Policy Enforcers that say they are "Protecting, and Serving" the Citizens is a lie, because they are not Protecting or Serving the Citizens when they are doing what they did in this case, the only ones they are Protecting, and serving is the Almighty GOVERNMENT, period, end of discussion. When the one Policy Enforcer stated that he "just wanted to get home", that was a lie, because if he really wanted to be home, he would have taken a vacation day, or personal day, and stayed home, but the truth is, he is being paid to enforce policies made by Government Officials, even when it calls for him to blatantly violate his oath to protect, uphold, and defend the US CONSTITUTION !!!!!

  • @hueysimon2726
    @hueysimon2726 2 роки тому +5

    When cops pull you over, you should also put on a mask to hide your face so they can't attempt to identify you that way.

  • @iRedacted
    @iRedacted 10 днів тому +1

    *_END THE LICENCING SCAM! THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL IS GUARANTEED_*

  • @georgeparrault9945
    @georgeparrault9945 2 роки тому +3

    Yes The 5th Amendment, in Part Means Citizens Do Not have to Answer Questions, and 1st Amendment Says Citizens Can Ask Questions, as Well Answer Questions if We Want To. ( Citizens Discretion )

  • @PamL.A.W.
    @PamL.A.W. 2 роки тому +5

    I don’t need a license to TRAVEL in my personal property 💥I can’t wait to see how it goes for me . 🇺🇸💪🏼👊🏼💥

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      Be sure to let us know how much the fine you pay is.

    • @PamL.A.W.
      @PamL.A.W. Рік тому +3

      @@Colgate64 it’s not illegal look up the amendments, it’s not a privilege to travel it’s our RIGHT . Please educate yourself & know I do not contract with the government, police . I am a FREE woman of The Land , Air & Water . Research it all it can do is help you . 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      @@PamL.A.W. Traveling is a right. Driving is not. It's a privilege which can be modified, suspended or even taken away. And you have not "contracted with the government" as it applies to getting a driving license. And that is my professional opinion, given as an attorney who has practiced law for 33 years.

    • @PamL.A.W.
      @PamL.A.W. Рік тому +2

      @@Colgate64 wrong maybe you should go back to law school & it’s NOT a privilege & yes it’s our right to travel freely . 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸😊Have a great life .

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому +1

      @@PamL.A.W. Driving a vehicle is not travelling. Driving a motorized vehicle on the state or country roadways requires a license. Getting a license is a privilege, not a right. The state can refuse to give you one, condition the license and amend it or revoke it. The physical license itself is not yours - it's the property of the state that issued it.

  • @deeannafreshwaters3282
    @deeannafreshwaters3282 2 роки тому +3

    I know that at least one Marion County Oregon officer will, has and does lie in court!

  • @matthewridgeway9250
    @matthewridgeway9250 2 роки тому +2

    Wearing a gun make every request a demand. Extortive behaviors. Highway robbery.

  • @georgeparrault9945
    @georgeparrault9945 2 роки тому +5

    It’s Bad when there’s Those that Attack Citizens when there’s No Crime and Nobody is in Danger of the Citizen being Attacked.

    • @americafirst6492
      @americafirst6492 2 роки тому

      Is Nathan Lake from Oregon, as they say you don't have a State Tag?!¿ 🤔😬😝

  • @pdionne03901
    @pdionne03901 2 роки тому +2

    The detainment was over 20 minutes and therefore is considered unlawful according to SCOTUS.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      Please provide a cite to this Supreme Court case

    • @shrconstruction
      @shrconstruction Рік тому +1

      ​@@Colgate64 Rodriguez v United States......look it up...basically long enough to write a ticket.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      @@shrconstruction Rodriguez doesn't say what you think it says

    • @shrconstruction
      @shrconstruction Рік тому +1

      @@Colgate64 I can read....I'm good. This isn't even the only case covering it.....thus says the Supreme Court thus is law.....thus the US Constitution says as it confirms the highest court in the land/law.....beyond appeal, period.

  • @kimdearrington258
    @kimdearrington258 2 роки тому +17

    By you standing up to them they were not able to intimidate you into doing everything they wanted you to do, which was to give up your Rights to a gang of tyrant thugs!

  • @petesfeeder
    @petesfeeder 2 роки тому +7

    "Just comply serf! You're endangering my life! If you give me your stuff it'll all going to go my way which is the best." Says all tyrannical road pirates.

  • @EdHotin
    @EdHotin 2 роки тому +3

    It's not easy to get through to the people that have been indoctrinated for so long.

  • @creese706
    @creese706 2 роки тому +3

    All cops have to have a SURETY BOND they don't want you to know it bc you can file a lien on it. Without a BOND there isn't a pd that will hire them. Even ghost officers have to be bonded.

  • @davehall3147
    @davehall3147 2 роки тому +8

    Immediately ask for a Warrent. Them using the red and blue lights is for emergency only. They already committed a felony. They stop you means you are under arrest. NOW ask for your ramenda rights to be read. Okay i choose remain silent. I will not aide you in giving you anything used against me and i terminate this interview NOW. DO NOT say your name they match you to plate and citation. COVER your vin #

  • @NH_RSA__
    @NH_RSA__ 2 роки тому +2

    Q. What crime is worse than practicing law without a license?
    A. Practicing law with a license.

  • @ShadovvV
    @ShadovvV 2 роки тому +3

    "To Protect and to Serve".. more like 'To Oppress and to Arrest'.

  • @iqcops
    @iqcops 2 роки тому +6

    6:34 "We've got one who can see! Oh my god! We need to get all the gang members out here!" 🤣 Movie quote from THEY LIVE (1988)

  • @LeDoctoer
    @LeDoctoer Рік тому +1

    Freedom to travel has nothing to do with operating a motor vehicle on the public roads.
    You're free to operate a motor vehicle on private land. You're also free to travel anywhere you wish.
    However when you operate a motor vehicle on public roads you must follow the state laws as per the tenth amendment.

    • @AECRADIO1
      @AECRADIO1 Рік тому +1

      FOLLOW LAWS, AND NOT INFRINGE ON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS WHILE DOING SO.
      LICENSES ARE A TAX AN ILLEGAL TAX.
      THE PEOPLE OWN THE NATION, AND THAT INCLUDES EVERYTHING WITHIN ITS BORDERS, INCLUDING OUR ROADS!

  • @bornfree3124
    @bornfree3124 2 роки тому +4

    Good job kid,
    ask them if any of the information they are requesting can be used in a court of law against you,
    For some pointers look up (Eddie Craig traffic stop script),
    Be good to ask these policy enforcer's if their abiding by their oath and the constitution, and if you are under arrest ( custodial arrest ) and if you are, ask them to read you miranda, then you would like your attorney present, and you are invoking all your fundamentally protected right's including your right to remain silent, and for the record officer no law is valid if it requires you to in anyway to waive any fundamentally protected right in order to exercise any other right or alleged privilege, and no law can convert the free exercise of any right into a crime.

  • @jd2931
    @jd2931 2 роки тому +9

    I wouldn't call this a victory at all he gave the cops all the information they needed. His strategy was totally terrible no formula whatsoever. If we want this stuff to work we have to show class as we do it so that when people watch these videos they won't think we are belligerent people.

    • @ohfingers5194
      @ohfingers5194 2 роки тому +1

      Couldn't agree with you more. And as much as I would support everyone's rights not to be persuaded by gangster cops, if the premise of his argument is that he is allowed to do any speed whatsoever as long as he considers himself non commercial not making money not carrying passengers for The purpose of earning money that he is simply traveling unfortunately he puts my life in danger And at that point his argument fails.

    • @solofourohsixgaming
      @solofourohsixgaming Рік тому

      @@ohfingers5194 You are misinformed. Whether driving or traveling "everyone" must abide by speed limit, traffic lights ect. Nobody is saying he doesn't have to follow traffic laws. Edit: The argument is not needing a license plate, license, insurance or registration for traveling.

    • @ohfingers5194
      @ohfingers5194 Рік тому

      @@solofourohsixgaming absurd commentary
      You missed the point entirely

    • @davincidanielson928
      @davincidanielson928 Рік тому

      ​@@ohfingers5194
      no victim=
      no crime.
      Putting your life at risk by his speeding is not a crime.
      Just as you stuffing your mouth full of bacon everyday is not a crime.
      Even though it puts your life at risk.

  • @brettmoore3194
    @brettmoore3194 2 роки тому +7

    Like I tell every veteran , thank you for your service

  • @livingsoul-notacorporateen7248
    @livingsoul-notacorporateen7248 2 роки тому +5

    Great job. This takes courage.
    HOWEVER! You got a ticket for being in dishonor young man. You have to take care of that suspended license.
    Pay the fee to have license contract restored then CANCEL IT! I found a form here in AZ to cancel the license. It wasn't easy to find, but you can also create your own cancelation NOTICE. Then you hand them back their property if you still have it.
    You have to properly cancel that license contract because if you don't they will continue to tax, charge, and assess a fee to that contract because it is in dishonor.
    Once it's canceled they'll have no license number to charge or assess a fee to. But that is still an open contract man and you must get it out of dishonor or they'll hold that shit over your head as long as it's open.
    You still have a valid contract with them so you are not totally private and out their jurisdiction.
    I'm repeating because I really hope you take care of that suspension and properly cancel that license contract.....

  • @kenlane9402
    @kenlane9402 2 роки тому +5

    He's not free to leave because he's under faults arrest. Make them mirandize you.

  • @matthewridgeway9250
    @matthewridgeway9250 2 роки тому +3

    Never say 'thank you'. Never say 'sir'.
    Humanity is made of equally valued human beings.
    Reply using term that reflect their employed role.
    Not officer or mister or deputy.
    Use 'police person' that way you cover all of them no matter where you are or who they are.
    Make respect embrace rquality.
    Ask them to remove their weapons and put them in the rear of there vehicles before you answer questions. Demand to be treated as an equal and as an unarmed person, the balance of power must be respected.
    Demand to be respected.
    Demand to not be a statistic in policing quota insanity and violence.
    Ask them for their daily quote requirements before you answer any quetions.
    If they respond with figures, then respond by saying that quotas deliver corrupted policing outcomes and that from thst point forward, the stop is considered a corrupt and unleaful action.
    Ask the police how many warrants they acted upon that day, how many citations, how many stops, how much time for each stop. How many times they made a stop while armed.
    Fill their time with answers you demand to be answrred before you give ANY information out. Have a laminated list of the questions and use a white board marker to take noyes. Record everything. Record your dash board.
    Collect as much info as you can. Fit rear facing radar to catch speeding cops too.
    Go at them far stronger than thay can go at you.
    Git panic or "Stop" buttons that allert police auditors to your being stopped, on foot ot in a vehicle.
    Create far too much evidemce, make the courts bring sanity to policing by flooding the courts with police aggression and corruption.
    YOU
    CAN
    DO
    IT
    AMERICA
    !!!!!!

  • @s21killah
    @s21killah 2 роки тому +2

    13 minutes...best!. I want to get home to family gives the cop the right to threaten our life?

  • @hueysimon2726
    @hueysimon2726 2 роки тому +4

    Cops don't even know the difference between a request and a demand. So, if I go to his house, and ask for his money and threaten to kidnap him if he doesn't give me his money, am I demanding his money or requesting it?

  • @nodemediocrecy
    @nodemediocrecy Рік тому +1

    The court is on the side of the road and if your defending your private property then you are within common law jurisdiction and protected by their oath which is part of your pleadings for the Judge. Common law is Inherent and attached to LAND not civil STATUS!

  • @HealingYouNow
    @HealingYouNow 2 роки тому +3

    The bald heads. No offense to anyone that has a bald head but Bob Marleys song “chase those crazy baldheads out of our town” came to my head when I saw the po lice.

    • @kristiblack1428
      @kristiblack1428 2 роки тому +1

      Lol...God bless Bob Marley! He sang it like was and is!

  • @davidbryan8794
    @davidbryan8794 Рік тому +1

    While listening to this I wonder why the state would want you to have insurance. Because the state does not own my vehicle.

    • @chaddelong998
      @chaddelong998 3 місяці тому

      technically, the state does own your vehicle. via registration, and the fact you paid with fiat to acquire it. (dollars are debt notes. you can NOT own anything if you use debt to acquire the "thing".)
      that is how they are screwing us. there is no lawful currency in circulation. America has no assets, the UNITED STATES is bankrupt.
      EVERYTHING is debt. THEY hold the titles to EVERYTHING.
      so, if you want to be technical, the state is responsible for ALL repairs to the vehicle. you're just renting it, for a fee. (called tax)
      when the vehicle is sold from the original dealer, the dealer pulls the original title and send it to the state as registered property. (corporate vehicle)
      this original title just keeps getting renamed to who is the renter/taxable entity/driver.

  • @okiebear
    @okiebear 2 роки тому +7

    When you ask them if he needs the third amendment. You should’ve flipped him off and asked if he can read

  • @socialisolation370
    @socialisolation370 2 роки тому +1

    "I've got one that can see"
    The 1988 THEY LIVE film is a documentary cleverly disguised as a Sci Fi movie...

  • @sumatrican5990
    @sumatrican5990 2 роки тому +5

    The Nazi’s thought they were justified in their actions as well. This will never end unless we get the judicial branch on the side of individual rights. Safe travels everyone

  • @FlatEarthSovereign
    @FlatEarthSovereign 2 роки тому +2

    Contract law rules supreme. Over state and federal laws. If he has a fee schedule for rental of time, unlawful detainment (any detainment) on public record he has a binding contract.

  • @MB-tj8un
    @MB-tj8un 2 роки тому +3

    Plays Great Milenko at the end HAHAH love it!

  • @paulsartin8366
    @paulsartin8366 Рік тому +2

    I like what he said about wishing he had a microphone outside. I bet the body cam footage would be embarrassing for the blue line gang members

  • @liquorinfrontpokerinrear3271
    @liquorinfrontpokerinrear3271 2 роки тому +5

    Tell them your schedule fee of $10,000 for every 15 minutes you detain me. And ask them for there business card, there bond # and underwriter on the bond!

    • @ElWisdom
      @ElWisdom 2 роки тому

      Well said Brother

  • @eyesonwashington1
    @eyesonwashington1 2 роки тому +2

    Excellent job!!! Very well done sir! I love how you point out how they’re about to violate your rights again after violating your rights for stopping you in the first place, then remind them of the oath they swore to uphold that they’re violating by keeping you there instead of letting you go about your way. I also like how this video shows how you don’t need to go on and give the normal speech we see whenever a person has tried to do this in the past, and you only remind them of their duties under the constitution and it’s enough to get them to sort of uphold their oath’s and send you on your way. With a bs citation but freely on your way at least. Great job well done!

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      What "rights" did the police violate?

  • @virginiacazares9883
    @virginiacazares9883 2 роки тому +3

    In addition, lock all doors and both hands on the steering wheel.

  • @9yearsago733
    @9yearsago733 2 роки тому +1

    They never got a good look at Nathan Lake.
    Nathan Lake always runs.
    Nathan Lake doesn't bow to the pirates.
    Nathan Lake is a good man.
    Be like Nathan Lake.

  • @64maxpower
    @64maxpower 2 роки тому +2

    They let him drive away with no license or tow his car? Wow, they were being kind whether he knows it or not

    • @Lemonarmpits
      @Lemonarmpits Рік тому +1

      They let everyone go with a ticket the thing is he left with a ticket, if they let him go without a ticket he's actually done something.. hope he keeps trying

  • @liquorinfrontpokerinrear3271
    @liquorinfrontpokerinrear3271 2 роки тому +1

    A "Motor Vehicle?" Prove that this a motor vehicle in the commission of a Crime?

  • @Paygelove
    @Paygelove 2 роки тому +3

    How can he not have a bond? How is he insured?

  • @jakeneal5659
    @jakeneal5659 8 місяців тому

    I'm glad the occupant of that recreational vehicle didn't get "officer safetied".

  • @dougoverhoff7568
    @dougoverhoff7568 2 роки тому +3

    I just can't get over how these officers have such little concern for our Constitutional rights. Even worse is they don't seem to know the laws that they are sworn to uphold! Pathetic. Collecting revenue and exercising their authority seems to be their main concern.

  • @gbpatriot2
    @gbpatriot2 2 роки тому +1

    Officer Engstrom was pumped up to break your arm as he dragged you out of the car, slam you face down on the road and punch the crap out of you. I Imagine he took it out on his wife later? You were lucky not to have all the gang putting their fists and boots in. It was a close run thing, so keep an eye out for Engstrom retaliating in the future, he looks like a bully boy who bears a grudge.

  • @nancy8219
    @nancy8219 2 роки тому +8

    I am so proud of you that was f****** scary and I was only watching the video I would have been s******* my pants in my seat and I've been arrested so it ain't no thing but I want to say thank you to proven how strong we can stay even in the middle of extreme fear and I haven't had a car in a minute but I'm going to be buying one and you have inspired me to be strong cuz I need to be that strong right now thank you again and keep on keeping on I want the guy in the video to please see this comment if possible by the way I just subscribed to your channel yesterday thank you very much

  • @rodciferri9626
    @rodciferri9626 2 роки тому +2

    What's really needed is a video showing someone successfully executing their own common law judgment against the government - or even successfully selling such a judgment. Anyone have link showing that?

  • @matthewridgeway9250
    @matthewridgeway9250 2 роки тому +5

    Charge them $150 for every ten minutes of unlawful detainment.
    Make a device like a taxi meter to show how much they will be sued as they detain you and a flag fall of damages and unlawful acts the courts should impose.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      You do understand that you can't bill the police (or anybody else) for your 'time' on a traffic stop?

    • @shrconstruction
      @shrconstruction Рік тому

      ​@@Colgate64 you wanna bet?...it's in federal code.

    • @Colgate64
      @Colgate64 Рік тому

      @@shrconstruction Please provide the CFR number for that code

  • @robertlacaille7359
    @robertlacaille7359 4 місяці тому

    You have inspired me and shown me great information.
    I turned my tags in. I put bumper stickers to put them on notice and made a trifold.

  • @rentiap
    @rentiap 2 роки тому +3

    Consumer goods. Not home goods. UCC 9-102 (23) "Consumer goods" means goods that are used or bought for use primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.

    • @hankwilliams105
      @hankwilliams105 2 роки тому +1

      The Courts in some of their decisions ruled cars, trucks, vans are house hold goods and or Consumer Goods. Slight error which is understandable when surrounded by Murders and Thieves that may make up a violation of one of their Statutes Codes Ordnances Regulations and Policies and shoot to kill and kill you. Home goods is wrong and he should use the term you stated or household good. Hopefully he will learn that from your comment.

  • @billstatenational6005
    @billstatenational6005 Рік тому +1

    He should request the county sheriff

  • @42roadsforman
    @42roadsforman 2 роки тому +4

    Asserting rights these oathbreakers sort uphold is always referred to as being uncooperative. By their own statement they admit that they are trying to intimidate you out of your rights or to waive your rights. Their definition of cooperation is waving your unalienable rights

  • @matthewridgeway9250
    @matthewridgeway9250 2 роки тому

    Unless they are all unarmed, questions are not questions.

  • @503i.d.tyrantsexsposed9
    @503i.d.tyrantsexsposed9 2 роки тому +9

    Hey I know this guy lol. We have done a cop watch together. Lol. He is a great guy. I'm glad to see him featured on somebody's page he deserves it

    • @americafirst6492
      @americafirst6492 2 роки тому +1

      Nathan Lake* The new example name- phantom Fleer! 😂😝

    • @503i.d.tyrantsexsposed9
      @503i.d.tyrantsexsposed9 2 роки тому

      @@americafirst6492 unfortunately maybe not unfortunately I do not know Nathan Lake LOL

  • @chaxs36
    @chaxs36 Рік тому +3

    This is the most delusional comment thread I have ever seen😂😂😂 how hard is it to get a DL?? I got mine when I was 15 bruh y’all trying to make things so much more complicated then it needs to be 🤣

    • @AECRADIO1
      @AECRADIO1 Рік тому

      SHEEP BOW TO THEIR CORPORATE MASTERS!
      RID THE IGNORANCE FROM YOUR MIND, AND RID YOURSELF OF ALL THE CRIMINAL DEMANDS MADE UPON YOU BY UNCONSTITUTIONAL PEOPLE!

  • @williambixby3785
    @williambixby3785 2 роки тому +1

    So you can literally do any drug in Oregon… but they send the whole force out on this guy?!?

    • @JIBMONEY
      @JIBMONEY 2 роки тому

      Yep, living in Oregon is a police state. The OSP, Sheriffs and city police are all rights violators here. This is a Democrat stronghold by a tyrannical government controled in Salem. All law enforcement here in Oregon are not oath keepers they are rights violators.

  • @coleford4258
    @coleford4258 Рік тому +1

    Driving as a term doesn't solely apply to commerce. Use whatever legal dictionary you want, but the term driver or driving refers to the act of operating a motor vehicle. If you operate a motor vehicle you're required to have a valid driver's license, you're required to register/plate your vehicle properly, and you're required to have insurance. You don't get to ignore the law because you think it somehow doesn't apply to you or because you don't agree with it. That's why you lot tend to lose in court, and keep getting your vehicles impounded, fines assessed, and jailed. You aren't standing up for any rights, you're making a mockery of instances where people actually have their rights violated or times when the government absolutely abuses its power. You do a disservice to the rest of us by spreading misinformation, and promoting false interpretations of the law.

  • @jinnidog5480
    @jinnidog5480 Рік тому +1

    All the gang intemidation, yet then they won't go after their own Who s committing the crimes of violating God given rights.

  • @ericmartin6657
    @ericmartin6657 3 місяці тому

    This is why We need class action lawsuits to change the state laws in all states that are violating our Constitutional Right to Travel! I I'm going to do it myself if no one gets to it before me!

  • @libertyfighter76
    @libertyfighter76 Рік тому

    The bald headed cop was dying to go hands on with the driver, his cold and mean looking stares told a very clear picture in my opinion.
    I commend the man, he was brave and ready to face the bad music, have his vehicle's window smashed in and then be dragged out, cuffed, arrested and taken to jail.
    Some people might comment and say that the guy was foolish, deliberately awkward, obstructive and wasted police time and resources, but I felt differently about the traffic stop and wished more American people would stand up for themselves and their Constitutional rights.
    The reason why the US government and law enforcement are trampling over every American citizen today is because they are not fighting for the Constitution and what they believe in, which is true liberty, the pursuit of happiness and to be free from unnecessary government interference and state corruption, tyranny, lies and oppression.
    If the US government can create and enforce laws that are profit based for them, then they'll do it, any way to bleed an American citizen of their hard earned dollars.
    This video proved that law enforcement are corrupt and tyrannical, they had a man in detention who was disqualified from driving and in their minds was clearly breaking the law, but they instead wrote him a citation for driving on the road while disqualified and then allowed him to go free.
    These cops had the lawful authority to forcibly smash the driver's window, drag the guy out of his vehicle if he failed to step out and comply, cuff, arrest and then transport him to jail, but they didn't...the hypocrisy stinks.

  • @anotherworldviewispossible
    @anotherworldviewispossible 2 роки тому +1

    Note to "Nathan Lake" - never run... It makes you look guilty ...

    • @americafirst6492
      @americafirst6492 2 роки тому +1

      Nathan Lake needs to sue for using his name * as 'Suspect Runner! 😳👍💯

    • @anotherworldviewispossible
      @anotherworldviewispossible 2 роки тому +1

      @@americafirst6492 😂. He may have a case. He hasn't been convicted, has he?

    • @americafirst6492
      @americafirst6492 2 роки тому +1

      @@anotherworldviewispossible ~ 🤔 Justin* Case, he should be warned. 😂

  • @brandoncummins9994
    @brandoncummins9994 Рік тому +1

    The red and blue lights along with the sirens are EMERGENCY lights and sirens strictly meant for emergency purposes only. No man nor woman needs to pull over when emergency lights and sirens are activated... the only action needed when emergency lights and sirens are seen behind you is to get out of the way of the emergency vehicle.

  • @patrickcarter8417
    @patrickcarter8417 Рік тому +1

    Learn your Constitutional rights 1st amendment 2nd 3rd , 4th , 5th read them all ) also know your > ( Inalienable rights as an American citizen ) read all of your rights so you understand

  • @UnrealNarcissist
    @UnrealNarcissist 4 місяці тому +1

    State v. Howard, NH: Supreme Court 2022
    To the extent that the defendant argues that RSA 263:1 violates the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the United States Supreme Court has explained that the Supremacy Clause "is not the source of any federal rights and certainly does not create a cause of action." Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Ctr., Inc., 575 U.S. 320, 324 (2015). Nor has the defendant cited any case in which the United States Supreme Court has held that citizens have an unfettered right to drive motor vehicles for non-commercial purposes on public roads. Rather, the Court has recognized that "the movement of motor vehicles over the highways is attended by constant and serious dangers to the public, and is also abnormally destructive to the ways themselves." Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U.S. 610, 622 (1915). "In the absence of national legislation covering the subject, a state may rightfully prescribe uniform regulations necessary for public safety and order in respect to the operation upon its highways of all motor vehicles "those moving in interstate commerce as well as others. And to this end it may require the registration of such vehicles and the licensing of their drivers." Id.

  • @solofourohsixgaming
    @solofourohsixgaming Рік тому

    Listen carefully, the cop said "A license, is property of the state." Meaning you have no obligation to contract with the state unless you are driving for commerce. Please, learn your rights.

    • @hunterpinson807
      @hunterpinson807 Рік тому

      Operation of a motor vehicle without a license is a crime, please try to reinterpret that for me

  • @erikbostrom.9318
    @erikbostrom.9318 2 роки тому +1

    "..if you don't... ..yer gonna go to jail."
    Threat to do violence.