i agree, however not fun for the car behind who doesn't have it fitted, and crashes into the back of Tiguan/Ateca and pushes the car forward, injuring the stupid person walking out onto the road
I think Volkswagen Tiguan is better because at the side impact the glass didn't break and at the front offset test the adult at the back didn't get such a big whiplash I think the safety belts at the back are tight so I think two cars are best
Seat wins. From a description of a frontal crash where both curtain airbags went off in a 2017 Audi Q7, "Then exiting the vehicle you have to push and duck under the bag to get out." HAVE TO. That means that in the Tiguan (with a similar side airbag system) you don't have the option, you are forced to contort your body and go under the curtain airbag (which might as well be a padded wall) to get out, whereas in the SEAT you can get out as normal. That means the side curtain airbag should only go off when it will provide benefit. Pole and side impacts? Absolutely, on the impacted side. Front offset? Maybe on the side the crash is on (in this case, driver side) because the body moves that way. Full frontal? A big fat heck no. The only people who are going to benefit from the side curtain airbag going off in the full frontal are people who don't wear their seat belts. And I don't want to have to contort my body in a crash to duck under an airbag which I didn't even use and that only went off because a few percent of dumbasses refuse to buckle up. Forget that, if I'm in a frontal crash and both side curtains go off I'm not ducking. I'm going to beat the hell out of that airbag or cut it and move it out of MY way. www.audiworld.com/forums/q7-mkii-discussion-211/deer-hit-2911619/ May 28, 2019 6:16 pm
The EuroNCAP videos can often be misrepresentative of the full testing, due to the fact they are not demonstrating all probes. or at least comparable views and probes under the exact same conditions. It seems they are omitting some probes in the presentation of the testing and annotate several aspects which cannot be straightaway comparable . For a standardized method they undergo in the testing, it shouldn't be equally hard for them to present standardized aspects of the procedure. As an example, in the AEB pedestrian probe part, the Ateca tested is shown under 30, 35, 45 and 60 km/h speeds, in comparison to the Tiguan shown in 30, 40 and 45 km/h speeds respectively. For one who hasn't paid attention to those details, the remark caption demonstrates that the Tiguan reduces more efficiently its speed to 11km/h whilst the Ateca to 30 km/h . Yes both siblings Tiguan and Ateca fail that specific testing, but the Tiguan likely gives the impression of being more efficient in reducing the pedestrian's injury impact though not under the same speed circumstances ie Tiguan's speed is 45 km/h and Ateca's up to 60 km/h.
they re not omitting anything, you just need to go to euroncap official page plus the system didn t fail, it reduced the speed. if the speed is to great, there is nothing it can be done except adding better brakes. the most impressive thing is that much much more expensive brands have nothing even similar.
Fail or no fail for the assessment itself of the specific vehicle, still the matter is that the euroncap videos - for some unknown reason - do miss the purpose of presenting results in a representative and objectively comparable way. One interested would expect to come and make some conclusions over the severity of the impact through comparisons made under the same terms. Euroncap videos are not meant purely for entertainment reasons.
no, euroncap presents in their website the results in an extreme clear and concise way. these are just the videos from the tests, not the results, you are throwing accusations without understanding what you are seeing
Haha... the lack of understanding stands for your interpretation of my words on the one hand, as well as on the other hand of the issue with the misleading presentation of euroncap results
Airbag is there mainly to protect you from hiting hard parts of interior, not to stop you (thats the job of seatbelts). So airbag in front of them would do literally nothing to help in crash.
+Autogefühl oha. gut, beim seitlich versetzen würde das ja sinn machen zumal das Auto ja auf die Seite katapultiert wird und der seitliche peitschenschlag reduziert wird. aber beim vollen frontalen ist das eigentlich zu viel des guten... übrigens danke für den vollen ateca-review! hat mich in der konfig für den neuen meiner Frau in der richtigen Wahl und was sinnvoll und wichtig für sie ist bestätigt. schade nur, dass es noch keinen Test eines 1.0er tsi's gibt, denn sie so nicht mehr. aber nachdem ihr aktueller altea xl auch der ganz kleine ist, der ateca aber einiges leichter und ein wenig stärker ist, wird der "motorische baby-ateca" (nicht in Bezug auf die gewählte Ausstattung ;-) ) doch ganz brauchbar sein als zweitauto...
the seat ateca is so beautiful!
It's fast as well. Well, the 2 litre diesel is.
The AEB Pedestrian thing is actually super impressive!
i agree, however not fun for the car behind who doesn't have it fitted, and crashes into the back of Tiguan/Ateca and pushes the car forward, injuring the stupid person walking out onto the road
I think Volkswagen Tiguan is better because at the side impact the glass didn't break and at the front offset test the adult at the back didn't get such a big whiplash I think the safety belts at the back are tight so I think two cars are best
3:52 The new Amarok
Hahaha good catch.
LOL =)
In ateca lane sistem is too i have i know
Seat wins. From a description of a frontal crash where both curtain airbags went off in a 2017 Audi Q7, "Then exiting the vehicle you have to push and duck under the bag to get out." HAVE TO. That means that in the Tiguan (with a similar side airbag system) you don't have the option, you are forced to contort your body and go under the curtain airbag (which might as well be a padded wall) to get out, whereas in the SEAT you can get out as normal. That means the side curtain airbag should only go off when it will provide benefit. Pole and side impacts? Absolutely, on the impacted side. Front offset? Maybe on the side the crash is on (in this case, driver side) because the body moves that way. Full frontal? A big fat heck no. The only people who are going to benefit from the side curtain airbag going off in the full frontal are people who don't wear their seat belts. And I don't want to have to contort my body in a crash to duck under an airbag which I didn't even use and that only went off because a few percent of dumbasses refuse to buckle up. Forget that, if I'm in a frontal crash and both side curtains go off I'm not ducking. I'm going to beat the hell out of that airbag or cut it and move it out of MY way.
www.audiworld.com/forums/q7-mkii-discussion-211/deer-hit-2911619/
May 28, 2019 6:16 pm
The EuroNCAP videos can often be misrepresentative of the full testing,
due to the fact they are not demonstrating all probes.
or at least comparable views and probes under the exact same conditions.
It seems they are omitting some probes in the presentation of the testing
and annotate several aspects which cannot be straightaway comparable .
For a standardized method they undergo in the testing,
it shouldn't be equally hard for them to present standardized aspects of the procedure.
As an example,
in the AEB pedestrian probe part,
the Ateca tested is shown under 30, 35, 45 and 60 km/h speeds,
in comparison to the Tiguan shown in 30, 40 and 45 km/h speeds respectively.
For one who hasn't paid attention to those details,
the remark caption demonstrates that the Tiguan reduces more efficiently its speed to 11km/h whilst the Ateca to 30 km/h .
Yes both siblings Tiguan and Ateca fail that specific testing,
but the Tiguan likely gives the impression of being more efficient in reducing the pedestrian's injury impact
though not under the same speed circumstances
ie Tiguan's speed is 45 km/h and Ateca's up to 60 km/h.
they re not omitting anything, you just need to go to euroncap official page
plus the system didn t fail, it reduced the speed. if the speed is to great, there is nothing it can be done except adding better brakes. the most impressive thing is that much much more expensive brands have nothing even similar.
Fail or no fail for the assessment itself of the specific vehicle,
still the matter is that the euroncap videos - for some unknown reason - do miss the purpose of presenting results in a representative and objectively comparable way.
One interested would expect to come and make some conclusions over the severity of the impact through comparisons made under the same terms.
Euroncap videos are not meant purely for entertainment reasons.
no, euroncap presents in their website the results in an extreme clear and concise way. these are just the videos from the tests, not the results, you are throwing accusations without understanding what you are seeing
Haha... the lack of understanding stands for your interpretation of my words on the one hand, as well as on the other hand of the issue with the misleading presentation of euroncap results
Giorgos Papaspyros
amazing how something so freaking simple is giving you so much trouble
Pretty impressive result for a non luxury category.
the driver back head crashes to the B column in case of a small overlap crash😣
This crash test is like comparing a vw to a vw.. The only difference is the badge
Someone needs to come up with something for the kids in the back, airbags in the back of the front seat?
Airbag is there mainly to protect you from hiting hard parts of interior, not to stop you (thats the job of seatbelts). So airbag in front of them would do literally nothing to help in crash.
AEB Pedestrian at 45km/h in Ateca is better than in Tiguan
I am buying the Seat Ateca soon.
Seen our full review? ua-cam.com/video/zFa9mNGowLE/v-deo.html
of course, and I liked it. THANK YOUU
It looks like when the side curtain airbags deploy on the first crash for the Tiguan, They lower 2 seconds after their deployed.
Can it be customized to activate side airbags even for the front impact? Watch the dummy, the head hit into the B column is terrible. And VW has it.
Hallo, ich glaube deutsch geht auch ;-)
was auffällt beim frontcrash: warum bläst der Tiguan auch die Kopfairbags auf und der Ateca nicht?
Hi! In der Tat, das war ein Fehler, der zum Punktabzug geführt hat!
+Autogefühl oha. gut, beim seitlich versetzen würde das ja sinn machen zumal das Auto ja auf die Seite katapultiert wird und der seitliche peitschenschlag reduziert wird. aber beim vollen frontalen ist das eigentlich zu viel des guten...
übrigens danke für den vollen ateca-review! hat mich in der konfig für den neuen meiner Frau in der richtigen Wahl und was sinnvoll und wichtig für sie ist bestätigt.
schade nur, dass es noch keinen Test eines 1.0er tsi's gibt, denn sie so nicht mehr. aber nachdem ihr aktueller altea xl auch der ganz kleine ist, der ateca aber einiges leichter und ein wenig stärker ist, wird der "motorische baby-ateca" (nicht in Bezug auf die gewählte Ausstattung ;-) ) doch ganz brauchbar sein als zweitauto...
gerne! Den 1.0er werden wird sobald möglich nachliefern
cool!
I am buying the Volkswagen passat is better than seat ateca because small overlap gets top safety pick +
Why on tiguan side air bag opens and on ateca doesn't?
+miha83 failure in this test
miha83 The system didn't fail. It just didn't feel the need to use side airbags in that instance.
Why can't the just us computers to simulate this ? I think this is why blew cars are so expensive?
because the computer wouldnt have let the head airbag NOT released