SAS Raid - Argentina 1982

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
  • In 1982, the the Falklands conflict, Britain had to stop Argentina's Exocet missile armed Super Etendard squadron and hatched a daring plan to eliminate them at their base in Argentina. Codenamed Operation Mikado, the first stage, insertion of an SAS observation post, was mounted, Operation Plum Duff. Find out what happened...
    Help support my channel:
    www.paypal.me/...
    / markfeltonproductions
    Disclaimer: All opinions and comments expressed in the 'Comments' section do not reflect the opinions of Mark Felton Productions. All opinions and comments should contribute to the dialogue. Mark Felton Productions does not condone written attacks, insults, racism, sexism, extremism, violence or otherwise questionable comments or material in the 'Comments' section, and reserves the right to delete any comment violating this rule or to block any poster from the channel.
    This video is not monetised and all images and film are used in accordance with Fair Use for educational purposes.

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @markashcroft465
    @markashcroft465 5 років тому +190

    Having served in the Falkands, the weather was atrocious.

  • @snook1249
    @snook1249 5 років тому +98

    I was a RAF technician supporting the aircraft that joined the fleet, the aircraft that bombed the runway and various 'other aircraft' during the Falklands conflict. I've never seen the footage you are showing. Thank you.

  • @Kayaz48
    @Kayaz48 5 років тому +43

    I felt so guilty after watching your videos so often, I just sent a small payment via PayPal. You are one of the best video producers on UA-cam, and whether you know it or not are making a MAJOR contribution to history with this. Deep respect.

  • @Jones7854
    @Jones7854 5 років тому +189

    France suspended deliveries when Argentina invaded the Falklands. Now imagine if Argentina had invaded the Falklands AFTER taking full delivery of the Super Etandards and the Exocet missiles!

  • @paulfrantizek102
    @paulfrantizek102 5 років тому +310

    Regardless of what you think of the politics, those Argie pilots had some serious stones, making those wavetop attacks in those Scooters. Some real ace stick-and-rudder work.

  • @richardk5246
    @richardk5246 5 років тому +15

    The tension in these videos is amazing, even though I knew Argentina had never sunk an aircraft carrier I was still on the edge of my seat. Thank you, great channel.

  • @kanagaway
    @kanagaway 5 років тому +16

    Coming home from work and excited to finally watch another excellent episode of Mark Felton's history documentaries!

  • @ThePilot4ever
    @ThePilot4ever 5 років тому +615

    With your info-diggings skills you could probably find Atlantis in two weeks

    • @villiestephanov984
      @villiestephanov984 5 років тому +11

      Peace of cake. No doubt.

    • @ronaldmcdonald3965
      @ronaldmcdonald3965 5 років тому +8

      clever

    • @annoyed707
      @annoyed707 5 років тому +10

      He already has. If you want to know where, it'll cost ya...

    • @rat_king-
      @rat_king- 5 років тому +3

      Dude its already been done mysteriousuniverse.org/2018/09/researcher-says-the-mysterious-eye-of-the-sahara-could-be-the-ruins-of-atlantis/

  • @markpointer2967
    @markpointer2967 5 років тому +8

    Yet again, Dr Felton, a superb production. Interesting, concise, to the point.... if only more history documentaries were made in this style, I think they would receive far more viewers.
    I recently saw a documentary about Operation Thunderbolt (the Israeli Special Forces operation in Ntebbe, Uganda, in 1976, mentioned in this film). It was 1.5 hours long. So, it must be amazing, right?? Wrong. It was SO full of repetition, padding, re-summarizing the story so far, and so on (this was excluding the endless commercials), that it made me realise just how good the Felton Production films are. It left me longing for a concentrated, 10 - 15 minute version. Awesome job Sir!!!

  • @germanpuricelli8958
    @germanpuricelli8958 5 років тому +16

    Nice video, thanks.
    I have read in the Argentine mass media articles that the "Seaking" helicopter was first detected (heard) by an Argentine oil extraction tower ignored by the SAS. The employees of this tower had reported the contact to the military authorities of Tierra del Fuego who alerted the coast guards about the incursion.
    There is another report of an Argentine patrol vessel detecting a small boat approaching the Argentine coast very close to Rio Grande. Apparently, the ship opened fire "blindly" following the radar "mark" at what, the boat (presumably British), noticing that it had been discovered, salied away.
    The Argentine Navy knew that the Super Etendards were important military targets and, every day, they took the airplanes out of the base and hid them among the houses of the city. Obviously, every day the place where each plane was hidden was changed.
    The "sensitive" sites of Tierra del Fuego (Argentine side of the island) and the border with Chile was guarded by, whatever was considered, the best troops of the Argentine Navy. The fear of a direct intervention of Chilean troops on the Argentine side of the Island of Tierra del Fuego caused that, neglecting the participation of these troops in the conflict, (there were many command groups of the Argentine Navy), any military attack on the Argentine side of the Island was very difficult.
    I have a couple of Argentine books about "mikado operation" seen with "Argentine eyes" but, saddly, I haven't had the time to read them yet. I promise to do that soon !!!

  • @_Matsimus_
    @_Matsimus_ 5 років тому +236

    Amazing work as usual!! 👍👍

  • @AirsoftReviewArgentina
    @AirsoftReviewArgentina 5 років тому +42

    Very good description on Operation Mikado. The Falklands/Malvinas War is such a short conflict that if any small incident was changed it could define a different aftermath. Respect from Argentina

    • @stirpsromana
      @stirpsromana 5 років тому +2

      @@nosnowflakezone3608 Malvinas is just the name they have in spanish. And you won them in the war, that's right.

  • @yashtee-v5084
    @yashtee-v5084 5 років тому +1681

    This channel is better than history channel thanks mark felton!!
    Thanks for 400 likes hahaha
    History channel is crap now aliens mysteries etc no lore history in it.

    • @u.h.forum.
      @u.h.forum. 5 років тому +12

      Rip the good old days

    • @robertfrench2807
      @robertfrench2807 5 років тому +7

      Bring back the military channel! I could watch that all day, even the repeats

    • @aestradarespeto
      @aestradarespeto 5 років тому +8

      Mr Felton does a historygraphycal work that simply History Channel do not consider take a worth. Good job, Sir.

    • @dusty4459
      @dusty4459 5 років тому +6

      Watching my kettle boil is better than watching the history channel!

    • @erlandnettum6680
      @erlandnettum6680 5 років тому +5

      History channel today is nothing but pseudo science. Total garbage.

  • @tonkerdog1
    @tonkerdog1 5 років тому +30

    My mums first boyfriend flew the remaining Chinook off the Atlantic Conveyor. Ironically he survived the war but died in the Falklands on exercise some years later, because of water contamination!

  • @kevken3293
    @kevken3293 5 років тому +21

    Jabber 1974, You do a disservice to the French, they kept stalling on delivery of previously ordered Exocets until the war was over. The Exocets used were old stock delivered when Argentina was still a British ally. Britain and Argentina were close friends until this incident.

  • @oveidasinclair982
    @oveidasinclair982 5 років тому +415

    That would have been one hell of a SAS assault on that Arge air field, most definitely would have went down into the history books.

    • @Lisandro-ym1sc
      @Lisandro-ym1sc 5 років тому +42

      Only if succeded, otherwise will be «classified» too...

    • @MrPhantom453
      @MrPhantom453 5 років тому +29

      White flags would have been popping up all over Argentina :-)

    • @MattGhii
      @MattGhii 5 років тому +64

      @@MrPhantom453 Why? The last time the British invaded Argentina with superior armament and troops (1806-1807) they where the ones to surrender lol, Argentinian people could be very dangerous tbh, they might not have the best weapons, but you should never underestimate an enemy

    • @Rudizel
      @Rudizel 5 років тому +14

      It would have had a high chance of failure, they were right to push against it.

    • @Lisandro-ym1sc
      @Lisandro-ym1sc 5 років тому +20

      @@MrPhantom453 Argentina is not México, you need to learn more about Geography...

  • @lennarthumpf8031
    @lennarthumpf8031 5 років тому +256

    Once a respected foe now a respected ally
    Greetings and respect from Germany to our British friends

    • @maxmullen6337
      @maxmullen6337 5 років тому +23

      Lennart Humpf. And thank you for all the help and support you Germans give to the British who simply want to be free of the EU. I don’t think.
      And thank you for refusing to do your share of protecting Europe from the Soviets, leaving it mostly to the Americans in NATO (with a little help from the British) while you make yourselves rich on a low value Euro while crippling weaker countries like Greece.
      A thousand years of history can’t be wrong. Continental Europe is more likely an enemy than a friend.

  • @slick4401
    @slick4401 5 років тому +438

    I know the Rio Grande base area well and let me tell you: It would have been extremely difficult for unsupported raiders to make it out of the landing strip. They might have caused some considerable damage because they were the SAS and who dares wins and all that, but on the whole they would have come out of the affair with quite a collection of holes each. For one thing, the landing strip itself was watched as much as the outlaying zone. A hostile landing inside the base had been considered a possibility, for obvious reasons, and there were literally dozens of bunkers and mutually supporting positions that looked both in and out.
    The Rio Grande base wasn't an improvised landing strip in the Libyan desert watched over by poorly led, poorly armed Italians. The area had been in fact a war zone during the entire seventies because of the leftist insurgency that had ravaged the country back then and constantly tried to assault military bases to steal weapons, kill soldiers and for propaganda purposes. So the place was not stranger to war. The perimeter of the base, which held critically sensitive materiel, was therefore quite beefed up, heavily mined and watched over by four battalions of Marines, perhaps the toughest soldiers we have outside the "Buzos Tácticos". Some of their commanders had in fact undergone training in the UK with the SBS and knew what to expect from the daring British. Also, unlike our starved, half-frozen conscripts in the islands, the Marines manning the defenses were well fed, well equipped and had decent bunkers and material support. The SAS brass was perfectly right when they called it a suicide mission. It would have been one more tragedy in an already tragic and unnecessary conflict.

  • @pendarricrolynd7444
    @pendarricrolynd7444 5 років тому +24

    Thanks Mr Felton, keep up the good work.

  • @kidslovef1155
    @kidslovef1155 5 років тому +637

    Why do all history UA-camrs have such good voices?

    • @SClerckx
      @SClerckx 5 років тому +141

      Because the ones that don't don't get popular

    • @gunner678
      @gunner678 5 років тому +1

      @@troo_story extremely well put!

    • @DirtyHairy1
      @DirtyHairy1 5 років тому +5

      Curiously, Drachnifiel has used TTS in the beginning and was able to build a reputation nevertheless
      but revealing his voice didn't hurt

    • @youtoob4life
      @youtoob4life 5 років тому +1

      They don't. I watched one a couple weeks ago, forgot who exactly, but he had a dull and boring voice. I'll try to find him

    • @iamejify
      @iamejify 5 років тому

      Kidslovef1 he sounds normal

  • @CarrickFoster
    @CarrickFoster 5 років тому +281

    Loving the Falklands videos, keep up the good work!

    • @Aren-1997
      @Aren-1997 5 років тому +14

      C4rr1ck I love Falklands war history, it’s super interesting but also super underrated

  • @danielmartin7756
    @danielmartin7756 5 років тому +7

    Many thanks Marc, as every post, highly interesting. This one in particular as I lived in AR at the time.

  • @pauliemc2010
    @pauliemc2010 5 років тому +20

    Lindybeige and mark both doing falklands war videos. Absolute winner !

    • @robinderoos1166
      @robinderoos1166 5 років тому +1

      As lindy pointed out, it was a conflict as neither side actually declared war...

    • @Wallyworld30
      @Wallyworld30 5 років тому

      @@robinderoos1166 Vietnam was also "just" a conflict.

  • @jeronimocanton9557
    @jeronimocanton9557 5 років тому +8

    Good video! The last Exocet misil was lunch in a combine attack with 4 Skyhawks that Argentina claim damages a carrier and England claim that hit the floating shell of the Atlantic Conveior.

  • @jasonrodgers9063
    @jasonrodgers9063 5 років тому +3

    I am REALLY enjoying your recent Falklands videos! Thanks!

  • @Not-TheOne
    @Not-TheOne 5 років тому +13

    Damn, interesting, never knew of this. Love the little facts behind larger stories. Also, firmly agree, awesome channel! You are great!

  • @wadeoct61962
    @wadeoct61962 5 років тому +3

    Mr Felton sir I just wanted to say thank you for your bringing all these interesting and overlooked stories to light. I emensly enjoy them and look very much forward to the next. I am a very proud ex member of the Canadian Armed Forces and as such I appreciate the significance of the stories. Ther are many Canadian stories as well I,m told we played a very important part in both wars. Thank you again sir . Cheers Wade

  • @howkamchiong6647
    @howkamchiong6647 5 років тому +22

    I’ve been watching your high quality videos since February,keep up the good work!

  • @Keplerb-od1lr
    @Keplerb-od1lr 5 років тому +27

    That footage at 1:50 of the Argentine jets flying low against the British ships is the hilight

  • @ericliu2753
    @ericliu2753 5 років тому +2

    Keep up the great work Mark. I always look forward to learning something new about our past when you upload.

  • @johnbeckman492
    @johnbeckman492 5 років тому +10

    The result of losing the Atlantic Conveyor was that troops landing in the Falklands had no overland helicopter transport and thus had to walk multiple days and fight their way to their target town.

    • @jeffwalters8552
      @jeffwalters8552 5 років тому +2

      I always wondered why they were marching all over, that would explain it!

  • @hrvojegrgic5111
    @hrvojegrgic5111 3 роки тому +1

    Another amazing video and piece of history. Thank you.

  • @ianrobson9601
    @ianrobson9601 5 років тому +5

    First time I've ever heard about this and I live in Hereford !! Great video Mark.

  • @househive707
    @househive707 5 років тому +2

    Considering the seeming crackdown on military history on UA-cam I'm very pleased this was on top of my feed when I got home from work.
    Keep up the good work, Mark. Cheers to you for these videos!

  • @ianturner7537
    @ianturner7537 5 років тому +23

    Well done mark another great video about the falklands war i would love to see one about the battle of port stanley and the argentinian invasion

    • @richardyoung4616
      @richardyoung4616 5 років тому

      There are several really good books that go into more detail. The Argentine suffered terribly, most were drafted and lived in tropic climate. They didn't give them enough clothing for the cold climate or food. Some of the locals had to feed them or they would have died.

    • @stirpsromana
      @stirpsromana 5 років тому +2

      @@richardyoung4616 Not tropical, an important number of conscripts from Chaco and Corrientes provinces were sent, not tropical but subtropical. Pretty dumb to not send the armies from Buenos Aires, Mendoza and Patagonia, but we had to keep them by the chilean frontier in case those coward chileans try something.

  • @bigblue6917
    @bigblue6917 5 років тому +203

    Interestingly the destruction of HMS Sheffield was down to fires started by the missiles engine rather then the warhead which did not explode. In fact if it was not for the fact that the sea water fire main was knocked out the ship could well have been saved.
    In the case of the Atlantic Conveyor there is no conclusive evidence that the warhead exploded and again it is possible the missiles engine caused a fire in the fuel and ammunition aboard the Atlantic Conveyor which burnt the ship out. So it is possible that even if the carriers had been hit, and assuming the fire control worked well, the may not have been knocked out.
    Argentina did try to obtain more missiles but the British Secret Service did set up a number of fake arms dealers to diverted Argentina from pursuing sources which could genuinely supply a few missiles. France, to its credit, stopped a supply of missiles going to Peru which they thought could have been diverted to Argentina. Though how much that was influenced by the fact that British intelligence knew what was going on would be interesting to know.

    • @OGPatriot03
      @OGPatriot03 5 років тому +6

      One might think the French sold purposely defective missiles, but to their credit they incapacitated both ships, I see no reason why the same wouldn't happen to one of their tiny carriers.

    • @jwenting
      @jwenting 5 років тому +32

      Argentina also tried to obtain Harpoon missiles from several sources but US pressure prevented that from happening as well. Initially it was however far from certain the USA would even support the UK, there was talk in Washington of remaining neutral or even siding with Argentina as the strategic importance of retaining Argentina as an ally in South America was deemed very important, more important than the expected damage to UK/US relations by some highly influential figures in the US State Department and congress.
      It was mostly the friendship between President Reagan and Mrs. Thatcher that meant the US stood firm with the UK.

  • @USER351
    @USER351 5 років тому +8

    My understanding from the Argentinian pilot’s testimony is that his target radar could not differentiate between the carrier and the transport ship as they were both large targets. He had detected both, and he just had to pick one.

  • @krennicsaspirations4883
    @krennicsaspirations4883 5 років тому +8

    I love the coverage of lesser known events in history. I feel The Battle of Castle Itter would make a great video, it's an incredible story that doesn't get enough recognition.

  • @vincewindeuycker3219
    @vincewindeuycker3219 5 років тому

    I love the mix of eras of history you portray on your channel ......loved to see this one..... Had only seen previously this described in one or two sentences.....nice to finally get the WHOLE story...... keep up the OUTSTANDING work!!!!!💂💂💂
    🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

  • @JonBowe
    @JonBowe 5 років тому +2

    Always good to see that History is not all being lost to Hollywood remakes, and historical facts are being kept intact. Thanks

  • @MillWheelDad
    @MillWheelDad 5 років тому +7

    Interesting video. Yes some fairly crazy things were considered during the Falklands conflict. Credit should also go to the Argentinian technical team that repurposed the MM38 ship launched exocet onto a truck, added a radar and successfully hit HMS Glamorgan on Jun 12 killing 14 crew. They had something like 30 missiles available from the navy. A week earlier and this small team of geeks might have changed the outcome of the conflict. Frustratingly I can find very little detail, but as they say victory is written by the victor.

  • @firefightergoggie
    @firefightergoggie 5 років тому +7

    Well credit where credit is due. The Argentine pilots showed some real guts. Can't deny that.

  • @MrBao-yt7bk
    @MrBao-yt7bk 5 років тому +22

    Long time subscriber, love your videos mark!
    ~cheers from Argentina

  • @bassoskat
    @bassoskat 5 років тому

    These videos are so addictive, always learn something new from them, thank you Dr Mark

  • @videodistro
    @videodistro 5 років тому +2

    As a low brass/trombone player, I approve of the theme music you use. Love that bass bone on the right channel!

  • @phbrinsden
    @phbrinsden 5 років тому

    Brilliant as always Mark. Less known incidents and always meticulously researched and presented. Thank you.

  • @henryatkinson1479
    @henryatkinson1479 5 років тому +1

    Best history channel on the platform, and yet another great video.

  • @bboxx069
    @bboxx069 5 років тому +16

    When you hear that intro music, you know it's going to be good.

  • @VoidHalo
    @VoidHalo 5 років тому +4

    I love it! So glad to see more on the Falklands from you.

  • @TheSunderingSea
    @TheSunderingSea 5 років тому +426

    Mark, would you consider doing a video on Ethiopian/African forces in the Korean War?

    • @Guhonter
      @Guhonter 5 років тому +32

      Oh yes pls, I love these niche stories overlooked in sake of the broader picture.

    • @FelixIsMyName
      @FelixIsMyName 5 років тому +27

      I never knew they were involved, so I second learning about this please Mark!

    • @CLK944
      @CLK944 5 років тому +12

      Holy moly I didn't know they even existed

    • @TheSunderingSea
      @TheSunderingSea 5 років тому +26

      To those in the comments, Ethiopian Emperor Halae salassie sent three Battalions to Korea as part of the UN forces in Korea, where they served with distinction. Salassie played an important role in the founding of the UN, given how the League of Nations failed to stop the Italian conquest of his country in 1936. Other troops from Africa included troops from South Africa and British Nigeria.

    • @philmcdonald4778
      @philmcdonald4778 5 років тому +4

      Or the Russian service men who died to put the nutcase regime in power

  • @the5thmusketeer215
    @the5thmusketeer215 5 років тому +31

    I recall being told at the time, that Argentina’s shocking success with their small stock of Exocet missiles, was viewed with such alarm and dismay by our Government, that immediate steps were taken to purchase all of France’s remaining stock of Exocet missiles, in order to prevent Argentina from getting their hands on any more!

  • @m4ckm4n59
    @m4ckm4n59 5 років тому

    Mark. I think this dude deserves one of you quality vids!! - Lachhiman Gurung

  • @archstanton6102
    @archstanton6102 5 років тому +140

    Dr Mark any chance of some Ghurhka history videos?
    Just visited the Ghurkha Welfare Trust nursing home in Pokhara which was very humbling.

    • @jeffwalters8552
      @jeffwalters8552 5 років тому +11

      @@rbeck3200tb40
      Ghurkas come from Nepal. They are legendary warriors that have fought for the brits for many years. Amazingly tough.

    • @tc1817
      @tc1817 5 років тому +4

      really? You saw the word spelled dozens of times I'm sure, and you still can't spell "Gurkha." Good job, dumbass.

  • @r2gelfand
    @r2gelfand 5 років тому +1

    Smashing video Mr. Felton!

  •  5 років тому +16

    You forgot two more missions. The air attack of 05/30/1982. On that mission, the Argentines claim to have hit the invincible or something. And the attack on 06/12/1982 with an exocet MM.38 (from the ground) that hit the Glamorgan.

  • @decimated550
    @decimated550 5 років тому

    Thanks for doing a video on this I’ve only read old websites and summaries. Never a multimedia presentation. Completely fascinating

  • @Shane-Singleton
    @Shane-Singleton 5 років тому +1

    Nice little history blurb. I actually have a model of an Argentine Super Etendard sitting on my desk that I built a few years back. It's aircraft 03.

  • @iamasmurf1122
    @iamasmurf1122 5 років тому +4

    The Skyhawk was one of the most agile aircraft ever made , light and could carry a huge payload and manouverability was outstanding and was one of the only aircraft of its size capable of carrying nuclear bombs

  • @Blyskawica1
    @Blyskawica1 5 років тому

    Fascinating and smoothly produced video as ever, only the raid itself an anticlimax!

  • @painmagnet1
    @painmagnet1 5 років тому +1

    These episodes leave me on the edge of my seat! More, please!

  • @duanequam7709
    @duanequam7709 5 років тому

    You are the new history channel. Great video and story.

  • @gwentchamp8720
    @gwentchamp8720 5 років тому +1

    Any day that Mark uploads is good day !!

  • @lightspeed72
    @lightspeed72 5 років тому

    Your narration really fits right into the documentaries. Thanks for not using robo voice!

  • @Willstangv6
    @Willstangv6 5 років тому +1

    Keep up the Falklands War vídeos if you can, very interesting and no one else seems to cover specific stories about it like you do. Most docs or info out there are about the war as a whole that everyone has heard of.

  • @rexcentx2254
    @rexcentx2254 5 років тому +5

    Epic mark

  • @tomascornejo7701
    @tomascornejo7701 5 років тому +9

    I would like to say that there was an another mission, against the HMS invincible with the last exocet missile, and a couple of A4-B bombing the carrier. But there are serious doubts about the result of the mission, with diferent versions from both sides. Apart from that, great video.

  • @youmaus
    @youmaus 5 років тому +71

    Mark please do one on the decoy mission that fended off the two exocets. Apparently they used sea kings like matador's capes pulling up above the maximum altitude of the exocets as the missles passed beneath them. I was aquainted with the proud father of one of the sea king pilots. The father was former SAS.

    • @zxbzxbzxb1
      @zxbzxbzxb1 5 років тому +14

      I've not heard that, was that the attack on HMS Ambuscade? I watched a documentary about Falklands war exocets. Argentina had 5 air launched one's, 2 destroyed Sheffield. 2 more were fired at HMS Ambuscade which deployed chaff causing the missiles to re-target and destroy Atlantic Conveyor. The 5th missile was shot down by AAA by HMS Glamorgan. The Argentines did have several land firing versions, one was adapted and fired at HMS Glamorgan causing its helicopter to explode killing 13. No others was used.

    • @youmaus
      @youmaus 5 років тому +12

      I heard this from my karate coach who was former SAS and had a son serving as a seaking pilot. What he told me was that they were instructed to fly at a certain distance from the ships at about the height of the ship's superstructure at a point that would give a couple of minutes of angle deflection from an incoming missle.As the exocet approached they were to climb. Apparently the exocet is designed to fly close to the water and does not climb very high or change course abruptly. The heleicopter that got hit may have been attempting this deflection.

  • @infinitysearcher8858
    @infinitysearcher8858 5 років тому +1

    Cracking story. I remember the events but had no idea on the details. Thank you very much.

  • @travisgamble8765
    @travisgamble8765 5 років тому

    I did not know of this not-so-little mission! Thanks Maek!

  • @TomasBelloXD
    @TomasBelloXD 5 років тому +8

    I love the SAS stories, specially during the Falklands war. You should talk more about Chile and his involvemt on it helping the UK.
    Greetings from Chile!

  • @danialkemp1
    @danialkemp1 5 років тому +1

    I really enjoy the videos on the Falkland Islands war. I am learning a lot.

  • @misterjag
    @misterjag 5 років тому +47

    The U.S. secretly offered to loan Britain an amphibious assault carrier in the event that one of her carriers was sunk.

    • @mh53j
      @mh53j 5 років тому +10

      misterjag have never heard that. Know US did offer repair facilities in Mississippi to repair Sheffield- of course, that was before true extent of damage was known.

  • @michaelswann8046
    @michaelswann8046 5 років тому +1

    Loving the Falklands videos Mark

  • @drpancakes7897
    @drpancakes7897 5 років тому +3

    Thank you Mark very cool!

  • @janetyeoman1544
    @janetyeoman1544 5 років тому +1

    The Atlantic Conveyor name was put on a new ship. I used it to send a wooden classic boat to Liverpool from Baltimore. The name on the shipping documents surprised me.

  • @colingibson8018
    @colingibson8018 5 років тому +2

    Good one Mark. I was down there during the scuffel but our part has yet to be acknowledged. However it's good to find out what other things were going on. People have no idea how complex an opporation the whole thing was. The fact that there were more supply ships than warships should be a clue. But!!!!

    • @sudonum3108
      @sudonum3108 5 років тому

      Ha, you’re a submariner. Thanks for your service ; )

    • @wideyxyz2271
      @wideyxyz2271 5 років тому

      Yup.....God bless all of them!

    • @mh53j
      @mh53j 5 років тому +1

      Colin Gibson when you stop to think what it took to get every man, bullet, howitzer shell, drop of aviation fuel, etc, etc down there in such a relatively short time, it was indeed a logistical feat. When you have to drop personnel, spare parts, equipment into the freezing ocean by parachute after a long C-130 flight-- somebody is committed to winning.

  • @meow1990_2
    @meow1990_2 5 років тому

    I am currently writing my bachelor's thesis about the Falklands War :) Nice video.

  • @russwoodward8251
    @russwoodward8251 5 років тому

    A hair raising turn of events. I am enjoying these Faulkland videos tremendously. Thanks.

  • @stocklee
    @stocklee 5 років тому +19

    Mark should've been my history teacher is high school

  • @Military-Museum-LP
    @Military-Museum-LP 5 років тому +2

    5 star Mark! Loved it.

  • @sigeberhtmercia767
    @sigeberhtmercia767 5 років тому +2

    What I read on the sinking of the Sheffield was the use of aluminium in the ship's construction caused some horrific incidents.

  • @rodrigosanchez4397
    @rodrigosanchez4397 5 років тому +5

    As always another Great Video! However, there was a last attack of the argentinian navy using the remaining exocet missile. There are two versions about it : the british claim that the missile was destroyed by Royal navy ships, while argentina declare that it hit the Invincible. Nevertheless both parts agree in that one more attack by super etendards did happen during the war. Thanks for the video!

    • @Foxtrottangoabc
      @Foxtrottangoabc 5 років тому +1

      If it did hit the invincible it definitely did not go off. I have never heard any first hand accounts from sailors who would have published that info to the press , not possible to sensor over time. I did see an argentine video claiming to have shot up the other helicopter or submarine ? that went missing with sas on board,, its a shame their is not solid info on those fellows

    • @eyesofisabelofficial
      @eyesofisabelofficial 5 років тому

      HMS Glamorgan was struck by a land based Exocet launched from a hastily converted truck trailer. Fourteen where killed but the ship survived.

    • @rodrigosanchez4397
      @rodrigosanchez4397 5 років тому +1

      @@Foxtrottangoabc Hi. Im inclined to agree that its difficult to hide something of that magnitude, altough I dont rejet the fact that may be an attempt existed but failed. I found the two versions of the events of May 30.
      www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/admiral-sir-hugo-white-commander-who-fought-off-exocet-attacks-during-the-falklands-war-and-was-9588010.html
      This is the argentinian, but it is in spanish
      www.infobae.com/sociedad/2019/06/01/doce-bombas-y-el-ultimo-exocet-el-ataque-al-invencible-el-buque-insignia-de-la-flota-britanica-en-malvinas/

  • @hshs5756
    @hshs5756 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for bringing us this coverage of the short, far away Argentine War. It was fascinating to read the news coverage at the time (made more interesting in that I was dating an Argentine woman then) and I've read an excellent book on the war, but I never heard of this attempted raid until now.

  • @Christopher-rw2bp
    @Christopher-rw2bp 5 років тому +5

    Wow! Released after I showered

  • @Carl_Gerbschmidt
    @Carl_Gerbschmidt 5 років тому +2

    Great video!!!

  • @saiga12commander
    @saiga12commander 5 років тому +25

    More More More...lovin the 80s conflicts...

  • @サンコサム
    @サンコサム 5 років тому

    Love the content, format, and your channel, truly appreciate what you do, thanks

  • @juanelorriaga2840
    @juanelorriaga2840 5 років тому

    I have always had a lot of interest in the Falkland War and you really go into amazing detail keep up the beautiful work.

  • @davidsanders1991
    @davidsanders1991 5 років тому

    Very good video. Very informative and fascinating. Keep them coming.

  • @davidsirett5560
    @davidsirett5560 5 років тому +1

    i wonder if things would have turned out differently during the Falklands conflict if the carrier HMS Ark royal R09 had not been scrapped in 1980.
    Buccaneer jets flown from the Ark royal would i think turn things more in our favour.
    terrific film as always Mark.

  • @geraldmiller
    @geraldmiller 5 років тому +1

    Nicely done!

  • @hugod2000
    @hugod2000 5 років тому +7

    interesting video, i had no idea. on a separate point. i know french advisers visited argentina during the war, i always wondered if they helped or hindered their war effort.

  • @MyLateralThawts
    @MyLateralThawts 5 років тому +28

    Alternate title: “The officer who didn’t dare ...and lost!” In this case, the Atlantic Conveyor!

    • @redcat9436
      @redcat9436 5 років тому +2

      It sounds lika Captain Legg lost his nerve.

    • @MrPhantom453
      @MrPhantom453 5 років тому

      Good point!!

    • @jptravers
      @jptravers 5 років тому +4

      There are surely many details not included here.

  • @JorgeUribe
    @JorgeUribe 5 років тому

    Great video! Regards from Punta Arenas.

  • @philshepherd4301
    @philshepherd4301 5 років тому

    Excellent video, well done sir!

  • @VenturiLife
    @VenturiLife 5 років тому +1

    I think there were some other problems around the Clansman radio frequencies and range which meant no comms, which meant not very useful observation.

  • @javiervonsydow
    @javiervonsydow 5 років тому

    Hello Mr Felton. I'm Argentine and was 19 at the time the war broke out and I remember the news about the Sea King having "lost its bearings" - as the British reported then- and landing in Chile. And the moment I saw this in the news I knew that you folks had landed Commandos in our mainland. Since nothing happened, it was assumed that it was for intelligence purposes, mostly to warn of air sorties in advance.

  • @rlemos5511
    @rlemos5511 5 років тому +1

    great videos buddy..keep going

  • @amesbancal
    @amesbancal 5 років тому +1

    Encore une excellente vidéo ! Merci

  • @Word187
    @Word187 5 років тому

    Like always an amazing video. I wish you were my history teacher back in the day