I know that this doesn't *_exactly_* apply to Afton's case, but I always love the verdicts in the video because sometimes you'll get a villain who gets like 24 death, 67 life, and 462 years, but then there's also a $250 fine, their pasta shop gets closed for OSHA violations, and 10 hours of community service in Guatemala or something on top. Something about the little things at the end of a world record sentence is just so cosmically funny to me
In regards to Sister Location, it's very possible that he actually had permits. It wasn't just a private lab but functioning as a rental service for his own Animatronics.
@@Connerthespider assuming that's not the Scooping Room you're refering to and it's the Sister Location Camera Room, debatable. It functions as a security room and him having cams on his kids can be excused as him being a helicopter parent. If it is the Scooping Room, that room is intended for the animatronics to be gutted for inspection. Definitely negligent since that tool is shown to be able to gut people and no safety bars could lead to accidental deaths
@@leandraferesthogar7249 I did mean, the Camera Room Even if that was the case, there’s 2 problems with it 1: that’s the only room in the building where the power can run out, which I’m not entirely sure, but that might be considered an OSHA violation 2: Handunit says something along the lines of “due to the sensitive nature of the chemicals that you may be exposed to, you will not be allowed to to leave until the Clean Up Crew arrives at 6AM” Which implies dangerous chemicals, and in a room where, even if there was a warning on the door, you can’t see it, would probably be another OSHA violation But since these are assumptions, it is still debatable, yes
@@Connerthespider one thing we can agree on is that even if the factory itself was legal and given permission, it would be shut down due to all yhe OSHA violations
One thing that should be pointed out is that according to Michael's monologue, William had asked Michael to go down there, fully aware of how dangerous the Funtimes are, which could be seen as a weird space between murder and attempted murder, rather than manslaughter and gross negligence (Might be a bit difficult to argue, though)
There's no way a murderer has a smaller sentence than a middle age man who keeps getting stopped by a hat wearing platypus. I really enjoy the content you do.
Well, think about that. Afton made life worse or ended it for few dozen people. Doofenshmirtz and Megamind actively attacked in one way or another entire cities dozens (if not more) times, so their influence on the society was far bigger - so the sentences are as well.
Cartoon villains commit more stupidly large scale crimes so they’re likely to get like Rayo’s number of death penalties. William Afton’s vileness comes from how horrifying being one of his victims would be. Not how many of them there are.
@@kubox000But at least, Heinz and Megamind did something William didn’t do: They redeemed themselves. (But to be completely honest, I seriously doubt William is broken like them. It has been proven he psychologically abused his children and, in the Fourth Closet book, hit his daughter.)
According to steel wool studios (they made SB) burn trap is actually the mimic who is seen in the ruin dlc Meaning that Afton actually died in fnaf pizzeria sim But I might be wrong…idk
@@oj_originals4304 He didn't. Ultimate Custom Night is what happens to Afton after Pizzeria Simulator. Cassidy made sure some small part of him survived in the living world and created a sort of hell for Afton in which he will be tortured forever unless every last bit of him from living world is dead/destroyed.
I will say, the killing of Charlie Emily was probably not First Degree: The Midnight Motorist Minigame happens canonically before Charlie's death so it's clear to say that at that time, Willaim was drunk and was mentally unable to formulate a plan to kill Charlie, and it's been stated in the MatPat Lore video that this was more likely a thought of the moment, a way of making Henry pay for what his robotics did to William's child, so he couldnt have planned this before hand. This would most likely fall under consideration of Second Degree Murder where the Person does not planned to kill before the act but felt like taking the life of the victim; William's selfish ways plus his grief towards his dead Son and the ammount of achohol in his body caused this crime which would intent a large emotional reaction that would give him the intent to kill Charlie, securing the 2nd Degree Murder instead of 1st. Now, his sentence for the crime: We dont know where the location is in the US Charlie was murdered in, but we know the first location was opened in Salado, Texas so it wouldnt be unfair to assume the crime happened in Texas, wether in the first location or not; The federal Sentence in Texas for 2nd Degree Murder would be between 2 to 20 years in state prison and a fine of 10.000 Dollars at minimum, due to the victim of the crime being a child, it wouldnt be unlikely to assume this would get him the maximum sentence. Meaning instead of getting charged with 1st Degree Murder and being getting a life sentence, For the death of Charlie Emily, William would be charged with 2nd Degree Murder and he would get 20 years in state jail and a fine of 10.000 Dollars.
I like to imagine that all these fictional villains are judged in the same great courthouse, one that is just a completely normal court house with normal court proceedings, except the people being tried are the most outlandish and ridiculous characters ever
It's kinda lore fitting when you charge Afton with death AND life sentences. Something like Afton saying: "I always come back!" and the jury responding: "Great! You survived your death penalty! Now onto the 36 consecutive life imprisonment!"
6:40 I think that William Afton, in this instance, would be charged with identity fraud. Since, due to the somewhat transfer of consciousness, he would be impersonating Vanny.
I think in FNaF VR the player gets trapped in the game. I may be wrong but if that interpretation is correct than Afton would also have a kidnapping charge for keeping someone in the game.
For and Vanny and Jeremy, I guess you could count them as psychological torture, as it drove them both to the brink of insanity and even causing one to commit suicide.
If we're charging William for the company's manslaughter of Phone Guy, we also should charge him with concealing multiple felonies. Phone Guy warns us on the very first night that if you disappear during your shift, the company will file a missing person's report within 90 days, or after the carpets have been changed and the floors and walls are properly bleached. If that's not bad enough, the warranties they make you agree to prior to signing up can't possibly be legal either. Add some more lawsuits to the tally.
Does Afton even own the FNAF 1 location? I've heard speculation that Afton died shortly before the FNAF 1 games took place, and I doubt Emily would be wantonly killing security guards for no reason.
william died AFTER he destroyed the FNAF 1 animatronics they were intact when the first game took place the classic animatronics' souls killed him after william released them
@@commentspae Sounds feasible. I think Id's Fantasy claimed that the secret rooms that Phone Guy mentions in FNAF 3 were closed off *because* they found William inside of Springtrap, which meant that FNAF 1 was after his death. In retrospect, though, the secret room could've been closed due to the initial Missing Children's Incident, too. Who's to say that the false wall didn't just collapse in on itself in the state of disrepair the FNAF 1 location had during the minigames? And why would the ghosts go back inside the animatronics after being dismantled? Sorry for the crackpot theory, FNAF lore's complicated.
@@teajai45he died in the FNAF 1 building, he got springtrapped in 1993 and when you complete the game if you look at the date on the check it says 1993, he’d also have to of been alive since it is his business and he woulda needed to be alive to have it built
I'm gonna say abuse should be added on as well- if he's the yellow man in Midnight Motorist, that would make him abusive, as his yelling at his son and banging on the door is abusive behavior (and the person on the couch telling him to leave them alone implies it's a pattern). Not to mention his relationship with Vanessa in the movie- Mike says outright that he definitely messed her up bad.
@@xxtmntxxrae4544 We actually do know a lot. We’ve had 9 years to figure this out, and the community has a lot solved. Just gonna say that Afton didn’t own anything after his first murders. He just worked there as a normal employee. Plus Michael burns down Fazbear Frights, not William
@@ImCruzzyWuzzy So is the consciousness transfer machine actually a quantum computer? In case you don't know what that is, I think the channels Arvin Ash, Veritasium and Kurzgesagt will tell you.
If you think about it, technically William should have an insanity case considering he talks about wanting immortality or to bring back his dead children. Definitely has quite a bit of insanity going on in his head
@@jaoofynah William would get a pardoned by the government like imagine a soldier can come back with a war machine of a animatronic body with the only way to destroy remnant is by burning it also if Gregory actually a robot that would mean high paying figures can be given a immortal young body that works similar to a real body
@@gameuniverse5973 The US Government would move in and seize Afton's years worth of research, development, prototypes, and contraptions and find a way to somehow use them in warfare or other government applications. Afton is recruited by the government and is forced to work for them in exchange for not getting sent to Cassidy's hell.
He is one of the most straight up evil villains in any game ever. I don't think being insane would save him from being killed in prison or sentenced to death so it really doesn't matter.
I would love to see an animation with William Afton in a court room and after hearing all his sentences for the crimes, and as the judge says "And for the building of a unpermitted bunker, the bunker shall be removed and destroyed." And then William Afton just starts kicking and screaming cause it'd be really funny that over the multiple accounts of killing he only really cares about his bunker.
Now I’m curious about Vanessa’s (movie version) sentence. Because even small things she does like littering Mikes prescription medication is both stealing and littering, not to mention she throws it into the water, meaning the pills will dissolve and likely harm wildlife. And that’s ignoring the fact she was using police equipment with evil intent, threatened to shoot Mike for no reason She also assisted William in the luring part of murders, and kept her job as a cop despite knowing of the murders her dad committed and never admitting to legal authority. I know there’s more to her crimes, but I’m genuinely curious what her realistic sentencing would be
Because she helped him in the murders knowing it was wrong she should be convicted of a life sentence and potentially the death penalty we don’t know how many victims she killed or assisted in but assuming that she became a cop when she was 18 or so continuing on helping her father despite having a way to tell the police force of him! Is telling its self. My verdict: life sentence , attempted murder, coerced, intimidation, assault, and felony offense of keeping information of cases confidential knowing the implications of the crime.
@@Isolation2001 sounds right, thanks for gathering that info! I’m not too knowledgeable on law enforcement so it’s really cool to see someone use the points I made and accurately convict them lol
Ultimate Custom Night was just one of his victims wanting to keep him alive just to torture him for what he did to them specifically. The springlock failure was karma hitting him like a b*tch.
Technically there are a few canonical jumpscares I know if: -FNAF 3 phantom jumpscares could be canonical because they are non lethal -Sister location Funtime Foxy jumpscare is canonical because that’s what leads you to being kidnapped -Pizzaria simulator technically all of the “testing/interrogation” jumpscares are real because they are non-lethal, and only lead to them being in the vents -UCN all jumpscares are canonical 😂 -VR Help wanted most jumpscares are canonical because of it being an in universe sort of thing (I’m not sure from Security Breach- Ruin because I haven’t gotten there on Markiplier FNAF playlist lol)
I agree with this, however, while it’s not murder, you can absolutely slap on x6 first degree attempted since even though we alone know for definite sure that he’s trying to kill him, the night guard can most certainly feel threatened and know what Afton is trying to do… especially given their connection…
There are a couple of problems with this 1. The jumpscares don’t count because they’re not canon 2. The jumpscares in the first 2 games don’t count because he wasn’t technically responsible for those same as the mechanics in sister location 3. Micheal’s death in sister location also doesn’t count for the same reason as the last one
Allow me to add a few more to this list: if we're under the assumption that Glitchtrap is in fact William Afton and not the Mimic1 program, then his crimes as Glitchtrap stretch far beyond just what happened to Vanny and Jeremy. 1. Since you're counting Vanny's crimes as Afton's, that would mean that Patient 46 (Gregory) would fall under this category too as he was the one who gave Afton control of the Glamrocks, making Afton responsible for almost every crime the Glamrocks end up committing over the events of Security Breach and all the deaths they caused as a result of Gregory's tampering, giving him more second degree murder charges for the 3 therapists that were killed by the Glamrocks. 2. Since you skipped over FNAF AR, in the unused emails for the game, it was revealed that Vanny hacked all of the Fazbear Funtime Service animatronics and turned them aggressive while also getting all of the employees killed by giving Glitchtrap control over their circuit boards, and while it isn't specified just how many people worked at the Funtime Service, there are a total of 7 known employees that worked at the service during the time of Vanny's infiltration, which would give him 7 more first degree murder charges for each of them.
2:20 not saying, I support Williams actions, or his line of thought but he does have a point in Matt Pats timeline. It was the robotic part that failed which means he would only be partially responsible. He helped Henry, but Henry build the Springlock suits would also get part of the blame. I’m no legal expert, but I would assume that the blame and charge would be split 50-50 between William and Henry as they are the the two owners of the company and they both worked on animatronics together
Well not really. Henry built the original ones, but those get expensive to maintain, so replacing them was William's fault, not Henry's. I mean, Henry wouldn't have been able to make the endos he built be detachable to have the suits themselves be costumes.
Here we go: -As another comment states, the underground bunker is used in some capacity as an actual rental service for the animatronics. There's a chance he got permits as he also has employees at this location, though 2 disappear and nobody comes looking so it's very hard to say conclusively. -While its hard to be sure who is directly at fault for the strength and safety of the animatronics jaws, we can at least include a criminal negligence charge on top of the murder for the baby's killing of elizabeth. As her father, he had an obligation to be sure his daughter was safe and making an animatronic for killing that she could access endangered her life. I consider the negligence of leaving a dangerous object around a child a separate charge from the murder charge. -Springtraps jumpscare in FNaF 3 isn't a canon event. Furthermore, he would have no way to actually kill the security guard as he is immortal. Though perhaps he would simply trap michael and set him on fire? -Speaking of fire, the FNaF 3 fire is not believed to be caused by William. The common theory is that michael afton set the place on fire to kill springtrap, but springtrap escaped. -Springtraps fnaf 6 salvage minigame jumpscare is also not canon. But when it does occur, the nightguard does not die. The animatronic escapes into the pizzeria after presumably attacking the guard non fatally. [Also the guard is still immortal.] This should be assault. HOWEVER, springtrap has a seperate jumpscare that "can" occur in the office that ends in a proper game over, so that could be considered murder if we assume springtrap deliberately sets michael on fire after knocking him out. [In FNAF 6 specifically, the most likely scenario of a game over is the animatronic attacks michael then leaves the pizzeria, meaning henry's trap has failed and the spirits cannot be put to rest.] -New lore suggests that burntrap is not the original william afton, but a mimicking AI replicating his identity and MO. As such, william should lose any charges related to glitchtrap or burntrap as his soul is canonically trapped in hell during these events. -For FNaF 1 jumpscare, michael afton is forcibly shoved into a freddy suit. He would survive this but his body would likely be forever trapped and also quite mutilated, practically combined with the suit like springtrap. We'll call this Mutilation as far as charges go, though such a charge is highly unusual on a corporate level. it may simply fall under corporate negligence with a harsher penalty. FNaF 2 jumpscare, jeremy would die of course. But he is already counted in the bite of 87 death as he is commonly accepted as the victim. And finally, the movie is it's own timeline so merging the crimes into one raplist wouldn't be accurate as we'd be doubling up on murder charges for children he killed in both timelines.
@@RWQFSFASXC-qc5fq the foxy minigame and save them minigame are likely both 5 kills each. Foxy was already in disrepair by fnaf 2 so he could not observe the dead kids in that missing children's incident. That must have occurred at the location before fnaf 2 (seems to be the same building as FNAF 1 but occurs earlier in the timeline)
@@Scar-PredatorNope, UCN occurs after FNAF 6. This is confirmed by cassidy speaking through the mediocre melodies. "He tried to release you. He tried to release us. But i'm not going to let that happen. I will hold you here. I will keep you here. No matter how many times they burn us." Cassidy is fueled by Agony most likely, and given that quote implies that agony cant be destroyed by fire like remnant. Afton is trapped in a purgatory for the rest of time, unless cassidy can ever finally find inner peace.
Considering William Afton's sentence is of 1 death + 22 life + 92 years + removal of bunker + $141M fine in the games, and considering the games lore, we can reduce his life sentence with what has happened to him: Springlock failure: -1 death. The springlock would remove him his death sentence because he died biologically meaning that he has died and we can remove him the death sentence. So -1 death here so far. Getting burned in FNAF 3: -1 life. The fire in FNAF 3 could be considered that it was lethal to kill anyone, therefore William died again, and dying means that you end a life sentence. So -1 death -1 life here so far. Getting burned in Pizzeria Simulator: -1 life. The fire in PS totally destroyed him and he went to Hell after, so that means he died again. And since he died again, he just finished another life sentence. So -1 death -2 life here so far. Getting burned in SB: -1 life. Same here as FNAF 3 and 6. William Afton died again burned getting destroyed again, and dying means finishing a life sentence. So -1 death -3 life here so far. And those are all the times he has died in the games, therefore his sentence for his crimes in the games is reduced and now it is: 19 life + 92 years + removal of the bunker + $141M fine. As William Afton is an immortal person, he can complete this life sentence. He just needs to stop doing crimes, die another 19 times, wait 92 years after all these deaths, get his bunker removed and pay the $141M which I don't how he'll get the money considering that he has lost everything lol.
Freddys is clearly very profitable seeing as how parents continued bringing their children there after the death of at the very least 1 child (crying boy) and at the most 5 children
None of his experiences with fire actually re-killed him except for one, though. All of his life sentences can be carried out in Ultimate Custom Night, at least!
In terms regarding ALL of Williams crimes: - 5 counts of company negligence - Identity fraud - 12 child murders(Elizabeth included with the DCI kids) - unlawful undergroud building Trauma against 2 or more children(fnaf 4 nightmares) - tamering with evidence - drinking while driving - kidnapping - destroying company property - dispose of a weapon - fleeing from authorities - child abuse These were all the things I can realitivly think of when It comes to WILLIAMS crimes. Arson and other things are on Micheal and Henry.
I personally wouldn’t put Elizabeth with his murders, murder is directly one person killing another, William warned Elizabeth not to go near Circus baby but she still did, yes those animatronics were built to kill but since he warned her and it wasn’t his intention to kill her I’d not put it down as murder but manslaughter instead since manslaughter is murder but just without the intention of killing said person
Holy shit, i never expected him to actually do this. This is so nice to see it all tallied up! I also like how he straight up included the jumpscares too
I feel like you could also charge him for reckless endangerment, as the funtimes and the older animatronics were all dangerous, with the funtimes holding most likely illegal functions and/or weaponry and the poor jaw mechanics on the old models, despite Afton being well aware of the threats they posed also Michael's case could be considered dismemberment, permanent bodily altercation and maiming fyi as he was turned into a zombie
The fact that most of these are all murder really shows how vicious William is. I thought it was all first degree murder, but then that streak ended in last when he stabbed Vanessa. Edit: you forgot to add an assault and battery charge for what he did to Mike when William entered in the suit , as he just tackled and kicked Mike in the face, and also a first degree attempted murder charge for William.
6:51 i feel this could be either kidnapping, hostage, or manipulation, as though he doesnt outright kill Vanessa, you could argue he is possibly threatning her life or manipulating her into doing his bidding, which would Also make him semi-responsible for manslaughter of gregory is he dies to vanny or Vanessa as he manipulated her to do it. It might be kidnapping because of the digital transfer, depending on if she stays there for life or not. 5:47 Also, you could argue, depending on the State of the bodies, that these two commited suicide by themselves without any involvment from the animatronics, but making it corporate manslaughter is fair.
I don't think anyone expected Mousait to do this but he delivers well nonetheless, well done as always! *Now I wonder what crimes Senator Armstrong committed* or Doctor Doom! Edit: 69 likes
the internet is all about mob mentality don't expect an original thought here they don't know what they're saying and defy criticism with "it's humor" i know, i've been using it for years@@spinosaurusstriker
I wouldn't charge him with Arson in FNAF 3 as the motive behind it doesn’t make sense. We know Afton enjoys killing people (considering hes done it over a dozen times) and during FNAF 3, Fazbear's Fright is only a week from opening with him being able to freely roam around it. Seems like a perfect murder ground for him to take advantage of, and also him burning down the place and potentially killing himself in process just doesn't add up with his character since Afton is shown time and time again to have intense self preservation instincts. One of his man goals in this franchise is trying to achieve immortality due to his innate fear of death. In FNAF 6 during the salvage minigames, when you get jumpscared, the animatronics don't kill you, it seems you just knocked out since the game doesnt end and you continue as normal, with the downside being the animatronics are now loose in the restaurant. So the charge should most likely be "Attempted Murder" if anything, or at least an first degreee assult charge. You missed a crucial part about the bunker, its a was revealed in one of the novels it served as an underground testing facility where Afton not only stored his Funtime Murder Robots, but specifically, he took children he kidnapped and experimented on them with hallucinogenic gas, while keeping them trapped in fake testing chambers designed to look like a house (the rooms in FNAF 4). I don't know what kinds of charges all of that falls under, but its definitely not a light one.
I have to wonder, in a court of law, what would they consider Afton’s crime when he tore apart the possessed animatronics? I mean, it’s not like it matters too much seeing as he would already have multiple life sentences on top of a death sentence (depending on which state punishes him) but just for the sake of argument, what would it be considered? On one hand, you could argue it’s murder, since the spirits are essentially living in the machines. On the other hand, you could make an argument that the spirits are no longer alive, and instead destroying their vessels is more like desecrating a grave or final resting spot. Either way, could see someone making a good legal argument for either outcome, on top of the fact that he broke into Henry’s private property to destroy the machines.
Honestly, I'm European and I might be interpreting US laws a little funny, but cops in general would be unlikely believe the spirit story, so a court would probably would only look at the property damage to the animatronics in that case. And since the spirits can barely utilize the animatronic's voice box to talk (we see in the first game that they can really only make creepy noises from time to time), I can't exactly picture them properly testifying in court at all on this. So William would be likely to get a vandalism charge for it, and given how much the animatronics are worth; it's probably classed as a felony (I looked it up; any damage done worth under 1000 dollars would be considered a misdemeanor in court, but an animatronic would DEFINITELY be more expensive than that to both build and maintain). I'm not sure how the sentence exactly works in the state that crime takes place in, so I'll leave figuring out the final sentence for that charge to the actual Americans.
I think there's such a charge as Murder Suicide where your actions intentionally or unintentionally caused the Victim to take their own life, so that's a probable. As for Vanny/Vanessa 9Security Breach version), there's always a good old coercion or demanding with menace.
The Fazbear Frights burning incident, was actually caused by Michael Afton (his son) and at the time he didn't know his father's soul was trapped inside an animatronic
8:29 There is a slight discrepancy here. The people getting killed in this scene were paid by the proantagonist's estranged aunt to trespass and mess up the place, so her nephew would lose custody of his sister.
Not really related but preventing any deaths from the guests in the pizzeria due to the animatronics would be quite easy. Just put some sort of pressure sensor in their mouths. If the sensor detects anything in the way between the top and bottom jaws, the mouth would be set to release.
The yellow man in the midnight motorists mini game is actually the father of one of the kids that went missing at Freddy’s, this is shown from the inconsistencies with what we know about William, and the fact the son wants to go to Freddy’s, even running away
One video game villiain that would be interesting is Dr. Eggman/ Robotnik, only in the games (Sonic Forces specifically) alone he became a dictator in a lot of countries
not to mention its attempted world destruction (several times), enslavement of a race of aliens, universal destruction (partial), infection at a planetary level, and several attempts at world domination. also destruction of the environment, animal abuse, attempted mass murder
or go full war-crime mode and do robo-robotnik/archie eggman, who is probably THE most evil eggman besides *possibly* sonic the comic(+stc online) eggman
@@emperortoho tecnically,the most evil eggman is the canon one,if you count IDW and prime into the mix. the guy in sonic generations,literraly attempted to destroy the multiverse,and also reformed to govern the same multiverse (space-time)
@@Sonic2024freedomera >literally attempted to destroy the multiverse, and also reformed to govern the same universe archie eggman did that and *succeeded*, earth post super genesis wave was half ruled by eggman even with sonic’s interference and he accomplished the same thing the metal virus did except it didn’t turn against him and lasted for over a decade
I’d say it constitutes more towards blackmail/manipulation and identity theft. Considering the action was against Vanny’s wishes, and also that the ordeal was carried out someone bearing Vanny’s appearance.
Fredbears mouth only needed a flat piece of metal to work, unless it had a set movement pattern that it was programed to follow there should've been no reason to why Freadbears mouth could've killed a child.
(2:56) im not a lawyer or anything, it could be argued that William could also get a Charge for Child neglect given how William allowed Crying child's older Brother to scare and bully him so many times to the point he was having Mental breakdowns being near and god forbid inside Fredbears family diner and not once has William realized that Micheal would take the Pranks too far that resulted in crying childs demise.
The burning of Fazbear’s Fright was caused due to foul play by his son, Michael. Which would inherently cause blame due to “destruction of property” and “negligence” but as Michael is old enough to take responsibility for his actions, the blame would fall to him. But in any case, Afton would have to face the “negligence” charge, considering he was responsible for the upbringing of his child.
His remnant experiments could also fall under illegal experimentation since he’s doing all of this without any known license or authorized equipment and the like. It could also fall under torture. We could also add child abuse in the case of the movie because Mike says to Vanessa “He really messed you up, didn’t he?” Implying that he abused her. And he even deflects blame onto her for all that’s happened in the movie. Murder, kidnapping, abuse, torture, etc. which were all his doing and fault.
2:38 the crying child is one of William’s sons, so this would count under child negligence, child murder, corporate manslaughter, and violation of OSHA regulations.
I find it strange, Does a regular murderer who kills Adults get the same amount of harsh treatment than Child Murder?, Child Murder is the most cowardly thing a Human can do.
4:37 In the salvage minigame, failing and getting jumpscared doesn't cause a game over, but just losing the salvages fee and having the animatronic roam in the vents. So technically charging him there wouldn't be right, as he doesn't kill anyone. Although just moments later he can do so during the night so this comment is entirely irrelevant and unneccessarily nitpicky
I don't think he can survive being thrown into a volcano, that could legitimately kill william afton after His "Death" and if Not it could at least keep him trapped for a long time.
@@nix0pluto Fire weakening remnant and besides the Heat would likely destroy the Agony infused Metal. I came up with the idea When I thought about something I saw From a reddit post about fighting The different FNAF Characters.
Great video, man. Congrats on 200K. The only thing missing is a child abuse charge for movie William and how he treated Vanessa as a child. If you were including the books, you could add another child abuse charge for Elizabeth Afton because he slaps her at least once out of anger.
@@oofyeet5935 With some theories, it gets even worse; he basically completely ignored the Crying Child during the entirety of FNAF 4, and only showed an ounce of emotion after the Bite of '83. He didn't even stop Michael/ the Brother (if it's not Michael) from harassing and eventually inadvertently murdering CC, even though he was likely working at the place that day.
6:02 I think it would count because whatever happened to the kids happened to Micheal, instead of a Freddy suit it was his own skin where he became living. (again you could ask how that same thing doesn’t happen to normal people, but this is a series where Chuck E. Cheese attacks random people)
if i know correctly, WIllam Afton dismantled the 4 main animatronics at Freddy Fazbear's pizza yes? im typing this halfway through the video, but i think that Willam Afton would recive a charge for destruction of company property, but idk
Objection: If I am correct the actual Sister location bunker is located under a warehouse not his house. As for the thing with the spring-locks. It is said that they are designed to fail and snap shut when they get wet to protect the Animatronic. The reason for the crying child’s death was due to Michael and his friends shoving him into Fredbear’s mouth and his tears getting onto the spring-locks causing them to nap shut. Not sure if that is an objection though.
The police and investigators to Willam Afton: “I promise. I will prove you guilty, the court will find you guilty, for all the blood you spilled”! Willam: “……You can’t”.😈
Also, the one in the salvage minigame should have been labeled as "assault", since when you fail a salvage minigame, after the animatronic attacks you, they hide in the pizzeria and you don't get salvage money
@@Gamegod-st1hz Actually, looking back at this, im wrong. He knew there were killer animatronics in the basement and left them with a death weapon, and he sent his son down there. So he can be charged for ignorance.
The scooper was created for harvesting remnant. He knew what it would’ve done. Would William have known Michael would’ve been undead by the scooper? No, but it is still gross negligence because… well, yes.
6:13 well, I don’t think William is at fault for this. He designed the scooper to be made to dismantle animatronics. It *would* be gross negligence that Michael died, HOWEVER, it is not a person/worker who caused the death of Michael. A sentient robot wishing to steal the skin of a person caused the death of Michael. William could get slapped with a “creating dangerous robots that kill people” fine.
3:04 not only did he create them, but they were created under the corporation Afton robotics his own company he unlike the last incident has full responsibility
I know that this doesn't *_exactly_* apply to Afton's case, but I always love the verdicts in the video because sometimes you'll get a villain who gets like 24 death, 67 life, and 462 years, but then there's also a $250 fine, their pasta shop gets closed for OSHA violations, and 10 hours of community service in Guatemala or something on top.
Something about the little things at the end of a world record sentence is just so cosmically funny to me
OSHA violations oh my gosh he didn’t even mention the whole probably at least 100+ OSHA violations in the pizza Plex
@@stargazer-eliteafton wasnt technically "alive" when the pizzaplex was built.
@@flyguydev2008 true and since this video is basing his crimes off of Matt Pats timeline, I would assume his wife would get all the blame
This reminds me of a course case where the crimes were a whole list of all the worst crimes followed by “and one moving violation”
@@stargazer-eliteis it really matpat's timeline? I don't remember him explaining shadow animatronics this way, but i might be mixing up fnaftubers
In regards to Sister Location, it's very possible that he actually had permits. It wasn't just a private lab but functioning as a rental service for his own Animatronics.
Well, permits for the building yes
But I doubt he got permits for “The Private Room” (where Ennard tries to kill you)
@@Connerthespider assuming that's not the Scooping Room you're refering to and it's the Sister Location Camera Room, debatable. It functions as a security room and him having cams on his kids can be excused as him being a helicopter parent.
If it is the Scooping Room, that room is intended for the animatronics to be gutted for inspection. Definitely negligent since that tool is shown to be able to gut people and no safety bars could lead to accidental deaths
@@leandraferesthogar7249 I did mean, the Camera Room
Even if that was the case, there’s 2 problems with it
1: that’s the only room in the building where the power can run out, which I’m not entirely sure, but that might be considered an OSHA violation
2: Handunit says something along the lines of “due to the sensitive nature of the chemicals that you may be exposed to, you will not be allowed to to leave until the Clean Up Crew arrives at 6AM”
Which implies dangerous chemicals, and in a room where, even if there was a warning on the door, you can’t see it, would probably be another OSHA violation
But since these are assumptions, it is still debatable, yes
@@Connerthespider one thing we can agree on is that even if the factory itself was legal and given permission, it would be shut down due to all yhe OSHA violations
@@leandraferesthogar7249 that is definitely true
One thing that should be pointed out is that according to Michael's monologue, William had asked Michael to go down there, fully aware of how dangerous the Funtimes are, which could be seen as a weird space between murder and attempted murder, rather than manslaughter and gross negligence (Might be a bit difficult to argue, though)
Yeah, but, I doubt that Michael and William had a good relationship
@@ghostvendetta0763 They were close though, just note that ! They knew each other quite well, being work partners .
@@justan_arctic_fox Plz don't mistake Michael Afton for Henry Emily.
@@justan_arctic_fox you mistaken mike for henry💀
@@walkersrevenge rip- it was like 12 when i wrote that- 💀
How will William Afton ever come back from driving under the influence?! Hopefully he straightens up and becomes a better member of society 🙏
Not when he is strapped to the Death Penalty Chair.
Well about that,
@@clarkejoseph49
Well, what he suffered is worse than death, which is better than simply any death.
whos gonna tell em?
Don’t worry, I’m sure he’ll join an AA group, because he always comes back, even from alcoholism
From 6 Months to Life In Prison to Death. Truly a massive jump from Driving under the influence to Murder.
we can all agree we've done this once ☝️🤣(im going insane)
Yeah
And then Death
Driving under the influence of murder 🤨
@@hakim9602 true
Imagine being a lawyer and William Afton is your client
true dat
His lawyers in question 5:47
Could try to argue he wasn't guilty by reason of insanity - sure, it means he gets institutionalized for life, but at least he doesn't get executed
@@ramnophone6650 nahhhhh
Saul Goodman:
There's no way a murderer has a smaller sentence than a middle age man who keeps getting stopped by a hat wearing platypus.
I really enjoy the content you do.
Well, the middle aged man is a cartoon villain so what did you expect really
He also got a smaller sentence than Megamind, we have no clue what that blu alien did to get 85 life sentences
Well, think about that. Afton made life worse or ended it for few dozen people. Doofenshmirtz and Megamind actively attacked in one way or another entire cities dozens (if not more) times, so their influence on the society was far bigger - so the sentences are as well.
Cartoon villains commit more stupidly large scale crimes so they’re likely to get like Rayo’s number of death penalties. William Afton’s vileness comes from how horrifying being one of his victims would be. Not how many of them there are.
@@kubox000But at least, Heinz and Megamind did something William didn’t do: They redeemed themselves. (But to be completely honest, I seriously doubt William is broken like them. It has been proven he psychologically abused his children and, in the Fourth Closet book, hit his daughter.)
Let's be honest here everyone,
William is surviving every sentence he got.
because he always comes back
@@thebaconman162
TRUE
According to steel wool studios (they made SB) burn trap is actually the mimic who is seen in the ruin dlc
Meaning that Afton actually died in fnaf pizzeria sim
But I might be wrong…idk
@@oj_originals4304 He didn't. Ultimate Custom Night is what happens to Afton after Pizzeria Simulator. Cassidy made sure some small part of him survived in the living world and created a sort of hell for Afton in which he will be tortured forever unless every last bit of him from living world is dead/destroyed.
@@kubox000that doesnt really count, that was just a tiny part of his soul. In essence, he died
I will say, the killing of Charlie Emily was probably not First Degree:
The Midnight Motorist Minigame happens canonically before Charlie's death so it's clear to say that at that time, Willaim was drunk and was mentally unable to formulate a plan to kill Charlie, and it's been stated in the MatPat Lore video that this was more likely a thought of the moment, a way of making Henry pay for what his robotics did to William's child, so he couldnt have planned this before hand.
This would most likely fall under consideration of Second Degree Murder where the Person does not planned to kill before the act but felt like taking the life of the victim; William's selfish ways plus his grief towards his dead Son and the ammount of achohol in his body caused this crime which would intent a large emotional reaction that would give him the intent to kill Charlie, securing the 2nd Degree Murder instead of 1st.
Now, his sentence for the crime: We dont know where the location is in the US Charlie was murdered in, but we know the first location was opened in Salado, Texas so it wouldnt be unfair to assume the crime happened in Texas, wether in the first location or not; The federal Sentence in Texas for 2nd Degree Murder would be between 2 to 20 years in state prison and a fine of 10.000 Dollars at minimum, due to the victim of the crime being a child, it wouldnt be unlikely to assume this would get him the maximum sentence.
Meaning instead of getting charged with 1st Degree Murder and being getting a life sentence, For the death of Charlie Emily, William would be charged with 2nd Degree Murder and he would get 20 years in state jail and a fine of 10.000 Dollars.
I thought fnaf took place in hurricane utah?
@@ragewireloki6213 we don't really know where FNAF took place, we just know where it's first restaurant was founded
@@joaogabrieldecmsilva423Yeah, and it’s not in Texas! It’s in Utah
Oh great, just when I thought FNAF lore couldn't get any more complicated
Actually, what nationality are the characters? Would that not narrow it down?
I like to imagine that all these fictional villains are judged in the same great courthouse, one that is just a completely normal court house with normal court proceedings, except the people being tried are the most outlandish and ridiculous characters ever
That just sounds like a courthouse in the Phoenix Wright universe.
@@fillerchannel7136Imagine Phoenix Wright having to defend these guys
@@TheDragonCat99Not even Phoenix would try to defend someone like Afton. I can just imagine him being like "Nope, this guy is a lot cause"
Better call saul then
@@pgreta1752true I don’t think you can justify brutally murdering 10+ children and inducing adults to suicide
It's kinda lore fitting when you charge Afton with death AND life sentences. Something like Afton saying: "I always come back!" and the jury responding: "Great! You survived your death penalty! Now onto the 36 consecutive life imprisonment!"
That’s giving:”Great!(Now get out.)” from FNaF lol
33
32 life's now :)
That's some fucked up karma! I love it!
“Well, good luck surviving the rest of your punishments.”
Police: “Makes it illegal to always come back”
William Afton: “20 life sentences”
No comments 😭😢😞
He's just gonna keep getting life sentences 💀
6:40 I think that William Afton, in this instance, would be charged with identity fraud. Since, due to the somewhat transfer of consciousness, he would be impersonating Vanny.
Technically, that's straight up enslavement.
I think in FNaF VR the player gets trapped in the game. I may be wrong but if that interpretation is correct than Afton would also have a kidnapping charge for keeping someone in the game.
@@trashbandit3270 OMG I didn’t even think about that! I applaud you for your analysis. 👏👏👏
Same for FNAF movie, he have taken on the name Steve Raglan. Pretty much twice.
It's not him, though. It's The Mimic.
For and Vanny and Jeremy, I guess you could count them as psychological torture, as it drove them both to the brink of insanity and even causing one to commit suicide.
In Vanny’s case, I was also thinking about adding slavery. I don’t think she tries to kill Gregory on her will.
Isn’t glitch trap the mimic? Not William afton
@@Advvex I thought William was Glitchtrap?
@@Superemie401 I’m pretty sure William died in FNAF 6 and is stuck in ucn and glitch trap and burntrap are THE MIMICC!!!
can you explain what happened to vanny and jeremy? i forgot
Saul Goodman could'ved argued it down to 8 years, maybe 5 with good behavior
If we're charging William for the company's manslaughter of Phone Guy, we also should charge him with concealing multiple felonies. Phone Guy warns us on the very first night that if you disappear during your shift, the company will file a missing person's report within 90 days, or after the carpets have been changed and the floors and walls are properly bleached. If that's not bad enough, the warranties they make you agree to prior to signing up can't possibly be legal either. Add some more lawsuits to the tally.
Does Afton even own the FNAF 1 location? I've heard speculation that Afton died shortly before the FNAF 1 games took place, and I doubt Emily would be wantonly killing security guards for no reason.
william died AFTER he destroyed the FNAF 1 animatronics
they were intact when the first game took place
the classic animatronics' souls killed him after william released them
@@commentspae Sounds feasible. I think Id's Fantasy claimed that the secret rooms that Phone Guy mentions in FNAF 3 were closed off *because* they found William inside of Springtrap, which meant that FNAF 1 was after his death. In retrospect, though, the secret room could've been closed due to the initial Missing Children's Incident, too.
Who's to say that the false wall didn't just collapse in on itself in the state of disrepair the FNAF 1 location had during the minigames? And why would the ghosts go back inside the animatronics after being dismantled?
Sorry for the crackpot theory, FNAF lore's complicated.
@@teajai45he died in the FNAF 1 building, he got springtrapped in 1993 and when you complete the game if you look at the date on the check it says 1993, he’d also have to of been alive since it is his business and he woulda needed to be alive to have it built
I'm pretty sure Henry was in charge of the company by that point, and William had been booted out.
i love how it immediately goes from 6 months to a life sentence
I'm gonna say abuse should be added on as well- if he's the yellow man in Midnight Motorist, that would make him abusive, as his yelling at his son and banging on the door is abusive behavior (and the person on the couch telling him to leave them alone implies it's a pattern). Not to mention his relationship with Vanessa in the movie- Mike says outright that he definitely messed her up bad.
Dude did some crazy research with Wiliam Afton but managed to solve it, huge props!
Agreed, though a lot of things are wrong
@@ImCruzzyWuzzywell technically we don't know much canonically so it could be correct or incorrect, we don't know.
@@xxtmntxxrae4544 We actually do know a lot. We’ve had 9 years to figure this out, and the community has a lot solved. Just gonna say that Afton didn’t own anything after his first murders. He just worked there as a normal employee. Plus Michael burns down Fazbear Frights, not William
@@ImCruzzyWuzzy So is the consciousness transfer machine actually a quantum computer? In case you don't know what that is, I think the channels Arvin Ash, Veritasium and Kurzgesagt will tell you.
@@frostfamily5321 idc plus that part didn’t say it was canon or not, plus if he watched the matpat vids, then all this would pretty much be 99%
If you think about it, technically William should have an insanity case considering he talks about wanting immortality or to bring back his dead children. Definitely has quite a bit of insanity going on in his head
If Afton actually did show that he became immortal, would it no longer count as insanity?
@@jaoofynah William would get a pardoned by the government like imagine a soldier can come back with a war machine of a animatronic body with the only way to destroy remnant is by burning it also if Gregory actually a robot that would mean high paying figures can be given a immortal young body that works similar to a real body
@@jaoofy yeah but that isn’t known by the people. Also still insane there’s other things but right now I don’t have the time
@@gameuniverse5973 The US Government would move in and seize Afton's years worth of research, development, prototypes, and contraptions and find a way to somehow use them in warfare or other government applications. Afton is recruited by the government and is forced to work for them in exchange for not getting sent to Cassidy's hell.
He is one of the most straight up evil villains in any game ever. I don't think being insane would save him from being killed in prison or sentenced to death so it really doesn't matter.
5:22 actually Henry made the second location without William so he would get charged for the bite of 87
“uhm, acktually…” 🤓🤓🤓🤓
I would love to see an animation with William Afton in a court room and after hearing all his sentences for the crimes, and as the judge says "And for the building of a unpermitted bunker, the bunker shall be removed and destroyed." And then William Afton just starts kicking and screaming cause it'd be really funny that over the multiple accounts of killing he only really cares about his bunker.
nah he actually would afton killed too much for him not to care
To be fair, he probably cared more for the bunker than for his kids
@@andresamaya6187To be fair, he probably started killing people due to his kids dying
Now I’m curious about Vanessa’s (movie version) sentence.
Because even small things she does like littering Mikes prescription medication is both stealing and littering, not to mention she throws it into the water, meaning the pills will dissolve and likely harm wildlife.
And that’s ignoring the fact she was using police equipment with evil intent, threatened to shoot Mike for no reason
She also assisted William in the luring part of murders, and kept her job as a cop despite knowing of the murders her dad committed and never admitting to legal authority.
I know there’s more to her crimes, but I’m genuinely curious what her realistic sentencing would be
Assistant to murder would definitely be a crime. She should be convicted considering she was responsible for helping him in the first place
Because she helped him in the murders knowing it was wrong she should be convicted of a life sentence and potentially the death penalty we don’t know how many victims she killed or assisted in but assuming that she became a cop when she was 18 or so continuing on helping her father despite having a way to tell the police force of him! Is telling its self. My verdict: life sentence , attempted murder, coerced, intimidation, assault, and felony offense of keeping information of cases confidential knowing the implications of the crime.
That's 7 years + $4,000 + life
@@Isolation2001 sounds right, thanks for gathering that info! I’m not too knowledgeable on law enforcement so it’s really cool to see someone use the points I made and accurately convict them lol
@@OddToSee812 yeah no problem! 😉
“Just because I like charging people and for the sake of the video…. ARSON🔥
Using Mark’s clip for the crying child’s death was pure gold
*Was that the bite of 87?!*
@@Superemie401 What's funny to me about that clip is his face lol
whats funny is that was the actual reaction to the the bite of 83
cuz yeah it was the bite of 83@@gabe_motherboard3355
My lawyer came back after leaving because how traumatic my case was
Yeah Williams crimes are fucking insane.
Why did I decide to read these comments? You could probably fill an entire FBI archive room with these comments alone
you could charge him with child neglect for not supervising his children
Technically he was punished for his crimes in Ultimate Custom Night and got karma in the spring lock failure.
it wasnt lawful tho so idk
@@horrormatrix9080
I say, a just punishment for unjust actions.
Ultimate Custom Night was just one of his victims wanting to keep him alive just to torture him for what he did to them specifically. The springlock failure was karma hitting him like a b*tch.
I heard he got away from it in 1987 or something like that before his death
Cassidy fr just said "Sentenced to doing 50/20 mode"
4:03 Objection ! Canonically, no security guards died during the night of the games. Dying means retrying = You're not supposed to die.
Technically there are a few canonical jumpscares I know if:
-FNAF 3 phantom jumpscares could be canonical because they are non lethal
-Sister location Funtime Foxy jumpscare is canonical because that’s what leads you to being kidnapped
-Pizzaria simulator technically all of the “testing/interrogation” jumpscares are real because they are non-lethal, and only lead to them being in the vents
-UCN all jumpscares are canonical 😂
-VR Help wanted most jumpscares are canonical because of it being an in universe sort of thing
(I’m not sure from Security Breach- Ruin because I haven’t gotten there on Markiplier FNAF playlist lol)
But the phone guy never lies after all the script was written by the creator
This would be attempted murder
I agree with this, however, while it’s not murder, you can absolutely slap on x6 first degree attempted since even though we alone know for definite sure that he’s trying to kill him, the night guard can most certainly feel threatened and know what Afton is trying to do… especially given their connection…
For UCN did, Cassidy really remake all of the FNAF animatronics just to torment William?
There are a couple of problems with this
1. The jumpscares don’t count because they’re not canon
2. The jumpscares in the first 2 games don’t count because he wasn’t technically responsible for those same as the mechanics in sister location
3. Micheal’s death in sister location also doesn’t count for the same reason as the last one
4. The robbers in the movie don’t count because again he didn’t do it
Also, the salvage jumpscare doesn’t count at all.
He doesn’t even kill you there.
@@reidvandervoort5769 you forgot the fire in Fnaf 3 because that was caused by Michael Afton
Bruh the jump scares against workers do count, it's either gross negligence or corporate manslaughter
What about the crimes seen in the VHS tapes? Or are those fan made?
Allow me to add a few more to this list: if we're under the assumption that Glitchtrap is in fact William Afton and not the Mimic1 program, then his crimes as Glitchtrap stretch far beyond just what happened to Vanny and Jeremy.
1. Since you're counting Vanny's crimes as Afton's, that would mean that Patient 46 (Gregory) would fall under this category too as he was the one who gave Afton control of the Glamrocks, making Afton responsible for almost every crime the Glamrocks end up committing over the events of Security Breach and all the deaths they caused as a result of Gregory's tampering, giving him more second degree murder charges for the 3 therapists that were killed by the Glamrocks.
2. Since you skipped over FNAF AR, in the unused emails for the game, it was revealed that Vanny hacked all of the Fazbear Funtime Service animatronics and turned them aggressive while also getting all of the employees killed by giving Glitchtrap control over their circuit boards, and while it isn't specified just how many people worked at the Funtime Service, there are a total of 7 known employees that worked at the service during the time of Vanny's infiltration, which would give him 7 more first degree murder charges for each of them.
2:20 not saying, I support Williams actions, or his line of thought but he does have a point in Matt Pats timeline. It was the robotic part that failed which means he would only be partially responsible. He helped Henry, but Henry build the Springlock suits would also get part of the blame. I’m no legal expert, but I would assume that the blame and charge would be split 50-50 between William and Henry as they are the the two owners of the company and they both worked on animatronics together
Well not really. Henry built the original ones, but those get expensive to maintain, so replacing them was William's fault, not Henry's. I mean, Henry wouldn't have been able to make the endos he built be detachable to have the suits themselves be costumes.
make the bryson charge please
@@anglepsycho Im no expert either but i'd say that Henry would be charged with negligence
4:03 you did not have to jumpscare me like that :(
Same here :((
Here we go:
-As another comment states, the underground bunker is used in some capacity as an actual rental service for the animatronics. There's a chance he got permits as he also has employees at this location, though 2 disappear and nobody comes looking so it's very hard to say conclusively.
-While its hard to be sure who is directly at fault for the strength and safety of the animatronics jaws, we can at least include a criminal negligence charge on top of the murder for the baby's killing of elizabeth. As her father, he had an obligation to be sure his daughter was safe and making an animatronic for killing that she could access endangered her life. I consider the negligence of leaving a dangerous object around a child a separate charge from the murder charge.
-Springtraps jumpscare in FNaF 3 isn't a canon event. Furthermore, he would have no way to actually kill the security guard as he is immortal. Though perhaps he would simply trap michael and set him on fire?
-Speaking of fire, the FNaF 3 fire is not believed to be caused by William. The common theory is that michael afton set the place on fire to kill springtrap, but springtrap escaped.
-Springtraps fnaf 6 salvage minigame jumpscare is also not canon. But when it does occur, the nightguard does not die. The animatronic escapes into the pizzeria after presumably attacking the guard non fatally. [Also the guard is still immortal.] This should be assault. HOWEVER, springtrap has a seperate jumpscare that "can" occur in the office that ends in a proper game over, so that could be considered murder if we assume springtrap deliberately sets michael on fire after knocking him out. [In FNAF 6 specifically, the most likely scenario of a game over is the animatronic attacks michael then leaves the pizzeria, meaning henry's trap has failed and the spirits cannot be put to rest.]
-New lore suggests that burntrap is not the original william afton, but a mimicking AI replicating his identity and MO. As such, william should lose any charges related to glitchtrap or burntrap as his soul is canonically trapped in hell during these events.
-For FNaF 1 jumpscare, michael afton is forcibly shoved into a freddy suit. He would survive this but his body would likely be forever trapped and also quite mutilated, practically combined with the suit like springtrap. We'll call this Mutilation as far as charges go, though such a charge is highly unusual on a corporate level. it may simply fall under corporate negligence with a harsher penalty. FNaF 2 jumpscare, jeremy would die of course. But he is already counted in the bite of 87 death as he is commonly accepted as the victim.
And finally, the movie is it's own timeline so merging the crimes into one raplist wouldn't be accurate as we'd be doubling up on murder charges for children he killed in both timelines.
Let's not forget the 5 extra kills he tallied in FNAF 2. Those are likely the same 5 children mentioned in the missing children incident.
@@RWQFSFASXC-qc5fq the foxy minigame and save them minigame are likely both 5 kills each. Foxy was already in disrepair by fnaf 2 so he could not observe the dead kids in that missing children's incident. That must have occurred at the location before fnaf 2 (seems to be the same building as FNAF 1 but occurs earlier in the timeline)
Afton's not trapped in hell. The only time he could have would be in between FNAF 1 and 3. UCN was a short temporary thing inside his mind.
@@RWQFSFASXC-qc5fq no, the DCI is separate, but Mousait did count them.
@@Scar-PredatorNope, UCN occurs after FNAF 6. This is confirmed by cassidy speaking through the mediocre melodies. "He tried to release you. He tried to release us. But i'm not going to let that happen. I will hold you here. I will keep you here. No matter how many times they burn us."
Cassidy is fueled by Agony most likely, and given that quote implies that agony cant be destroyed by fire like remnant. Afton is trapped in a purgatory for the rest of time, unless cassidy can ever finally find inner peace.
Considering William Afton's sentence is of 1 death + 22 life + 92 years + removal of bunker + $141M fine in the games, and considering the games lore, we can reduce his life sentence with what has happened to him:
Springlock failure: -1 death.
The springlock would remove him his death sentence because he died biologically meaning that he has died and we can remove him the death sentence. So -1 death here so far.
Getting burned in FNAF 3: -1 life.
The fire in FNAF 3 could be considered that it was lethal to kill anyone, therefore William died again, and dying means that you end a life sentence. So -1 death -1 life here so far.
Getting burned in Pizzeria Simulator: -1 life.
The fire in PS totally destroyed him and he went to Hell after, so that means he died again. And since he died again, he just finished another life sentence. So -1 death -2 life here so far.
Getting burned in SB: -1 life.
Same here as FNAF 3 and 6. William Afton died again burned getting destroyed again, and dying means finishing a life sentence. So -1 death -3 life here so far.
And those are all the times he has died in the games, therefore his sentence for his crimes in the games is reduced and now it is: 19 life + 92 years + removal of the bunker + $141M fine.
As William Afton is an immortal person, he can complete this life sentence. He just needs to stop doing crimes, die another 19 times, wait 92 years after all these deaths, get his bunker removed and pay the $141M which I don't how he'll get the money considering that he has lost everything lol.
Freddys is clearly very profitable seeing as how parents continued bringing their children there after the death of at the very least 1 child (crying boy) and at the most 5 children
"I always come back...
But at what cost?" - William Afton.
@@chrisbickel9023approximately 141M dollars :)
None of his experiences with fire actually re-killed him except for one, though.
All of his life sentences can be carried out in Ultimate Custom Night, at least!
@@CharaDreemurr-9999 When you're suffering in eternal damnation for the rest of time, I feel that equates to the charges given from a moral sense
I love how even if he didn't kill anyone William still gets crushed by OSHA violations
In terms regarding ALL of Williams crimes:
- 5 counts of company negligence
- Identity fraud
- 12 child murders(Elizabeth included with the DCI kids)
- unlawful undergroud building
Trauma against 2 or more children(fnaf 4 nightmares)
- tamering with evidence
- drinking while driving
- kidnapping
- destroying company property
- dispose of a weapon
- fleeing from authorities
- child abuse
These were all the things I can realitivly think of when It comes to WILLIAMS crimes. Arson and other things are on Micheal and Henry.
I'm pretty sure he didn't pay taxes while being stuck in the walls of pizzeria from 3rd Fnaf, so we can count that too
@@kor1sh0k53"Taxation is theft, don't pay taxes" - Dave from DSaF3
I personally wouldn’t put Elizabeth with his murders, murder is directly one person killing another, William warned Elizabeth not to go near Circus baby but she still did, yes those animatronics were built to kill but since he warned her and it wasn’t his intention to kill her I’d not put it down as murder but manslaughter instead since manslaughter is murder but just without the intention of killing said person
How about assault on a peace officer (Movie Vanessa)
@@kor1sh0k53 hes ded. IT DOESNT COUNT
One of the few characters who could reasonably receive the death penalty and still be charged further lmao
He always comes back
4:16 it wasn’t William Afton that burnt it down, it was Micheal Afton (his son) and the puppet from FNAF 2
the puppet aint do none
Holy shit, i never expected him to actually do this.
This is so nice to see it all tallied up!
I also like how he straight up included the jumpscares too
I feel like you could also charge him for reckless endangerment, as the funtimes and the older animatronics were all dangerous, with the funtimes holding most likely illegal functions and/or weaponry and the poor jaw mechanics on the old models, despite Afton being well aware of the threats they posed
also Michael's case could be considered dismemberment, permanent bodily altercation and maiming fyi as he was turned into a zombie
Bro used the Markiplier video 💀
Bro should stop using bro.
Bro should stop using bro and 💀
Lol
Since he put the dead body inside animatronics, shouldn't he also be charged with corpse desecration and healthcode violation
The fact that most of these are all murder really shows how vicious William is.
I thought it was all first degree murder, but then that streak ended in last when he stabbed Vanessa.
Edit: you forgot to add an assault and battery charge for what he did to Mike when William entered in the suit , as he just tackled and kicked Mike in the face, and also a first degree attempted murder charge for William.
6:51 i feel this could be either kidnapping, hostage, or manipulation, as though he doesnt outright kill Vanessa, you could argue he is possibly threatning her life or manipulating her into doing his bidding, which would Also make him semi-responsible for manslaughter of gregory is he dies to vanny or Vanessa as he manipulated her to do it. It might be kidnapping because of the digital transfer, depending on if she stays there for life or not.
5:47 Also, you could argue, depending on the State of the bodies, that these two commited suicide by themselves without any involvment from the animatronics, but making it corporate manslaughter is fair.
6:26 I think this one would be considered identity theft, forcing someone to do something against their will, mental trauma
@Princessallstar365Yes
But Willam didn’t do this crime someone else did
The S.C.U.U.P.E.R thing not the vanni part.
I don't think anyone expected Mousait to do this but he delivers well nonetheless, well done as always!
*Now I wonder what crimes Senator Armstrong committed* or Doctor Doom!
Edit: 69 likes
or doctor ivo robotnik,eggman.
Armstrong is a politician, so we all know he never committed any crimes
@@Delta_2209yeah no politician has ever done any crimes
@@Delta_2209What about high treason, because what did he do, break the 4th wall?
how is william afton almost as tall as the most of his creations 💀
4:25 understandable, however it's speculated that Michael Afton was the one who set fire to Fazbear's Frights.
So we would remove that charge to William.
I feel like in this case, you need to specify how many death penalties, because he'll keep coming back as a rabbit through each of them
2:50
Fun fact: The crying child is William’s son, apparently according to MatPat!
Everybodys known this ngl
This.
This is one of the best videos you've made. You can tell a lot of research has been done and every detail was nailed perfectly.
this has to be a joke , he uses the movie's separate timeline to add more charges.
@@spinosaurusstrikerit's just for fun bro
the internet is all about mob mentality don't expect an original thought here
they don't know what they're saying and defy criticism with "it's humor"
i know, i've been using it for years@@spinosaurusstriker
2:08 Ah, I see you are also a man of culture.
I wouldn't charge him with Arson in FNAF 3 as the motive behind it doesn’t make sense. We know Afton enjoys killing people (considering hes done it over a dozen times) and during FNAF 3, Fazbear's Fright is only a week from opening with him being able to freely roam around it. Seems like a perfect murder ground for him to take advantage of, and also him burning down the place and potentially killing himself in process just doesn't add up with his character since Afton is shown time and time again to have intense self preservation instincts. One of his man goals in this franchise is trying to achieve immortality due to his innate fear of death.
In FNAF 6 during the salvage minigames, when you get jumpscared, the animatronics don't kill you, it seems you just knocked out since the game doesnt end and you continue as normal, with the downside being the animatronics are now loose in the restaurant. So the charge should most likely be "Attempted Murder" if anything, or at least an first degreee assult charge.
You missed a crucial part about the bunker, its a was revealed in one of the novels it served as an underground testing facility where Afton not only stored his Funtime Murder Robots, but specifically, he took children he kidnapped and experimented on them with hallucinogenic gas, while keeping them trapped in fake testing chambers designed to look like a house (the rooms in FNAF 4). I don't know what kinds of charges all of that falls under, but its definitely not a light one.
I have to wonder, in a court of law, what would they consider Afton’s crime when he tore apart the possessed animatronics?
I mean, it’s not like it matters too much seeing as he would already have multiple life sentences on top of a death sentence (depending on which state punishes him) but just for the sake of argument, what would it be considered?
On one hand, you could argue it’s murder, since the spirits are essentially living in the machines.
On the other hand, you could make an argument that the spirits are no longer alive, and instead destroying their vessels is more like desecrating a grave or final resting spot.
Either way, could see someone making a good legal argument for either outcome, on top of the fact that he broke into Henry’s private property to destroy the machines.
Honestly, I'm European and I might be interpreting US laws a little funny, but cops in general would be unlikely believe the spirit story, so a court would probably would only look at the property damage to the animatronics in that case. And since the spirits can barely utilize the animatronic's voice box to talk (we see in the first game that they can really only make creepy noises from time to time), I can't exactly picture them properly testifying in court at all on this. So William would be likely to get a vandalism charge for it, and given how much the animatronics are worth; it's probably classed as a felony (I looked it up; any damage done worth under 1000 dollars would be considered a misdemeanor in court, but an animatronic would DEFINITELY be more expensive than that to both build and maintain). I'm not sure how the sentence exactly works in the state that crime takes place in, so I'll leave figuring out the final sentence for that charge to the actual Americans.
Vandalism
7:02 could technically be torture, if you think about it
Maybe some sort of Rape of the non sexual variety, definitely some sort of violation of self
The thing is. All death and life sentences are instantly taken out of the picture. He Always Comes Back,
But if they use the electric chair, it may finish him. Electricity seems to work well on the animatronics.
4:34 Maybe you could charge him for destruction of property here or something
I don't know
2:14 he really did the markiplier video instead of the random clip from a random
Anyways what I was trying to say is.
WAS THAT THE BITE OF 87?
I think there's such a charge as Murder Suicide where your actions intentionally or unintentionally caused the Victim to take their own life, so that's a probable.
As for Vanny/Vanessa 9Security Breach version), there's always a good old coercion or demanding with menace.
The fact that William could serve his whole sentence except for the fine maybe is hilarious
2:30 Was That The Bite Of 87?!
2:30 Was That The Bite Of 87?!
2:30 Was That The Bite Of 87?!
2:30 Was That The Bite Of 87?!
2:30 Was That The Bite of 87?!
2:30 Was That The Bite Of 87?!
The Fazbear Frights burning incident, was actually caused by Michael Afton (his son) and at the time he didn't know his father's soul was trapped inside an animatronic
8:29 There is a slight discrepancy here. The people getting killed in this scene were paid by the proantagonist's estranged aunt to trespass and mess up the place, so her nephew would lose custody of his sister.
Not really related but preventing any deaths from the guests in the pizzeria due to the animatronics would be quite easy. Just put some sort of pressure sensor in their mouths. If the sensor detects anything in the way between the top and bottom jaws, the mouth would be set to release.
The yellow man in the midnight motorists mini game is actually the father of one of the kids that went missing at Freddy’s, this is shown from the inconsistencies with what we know about William, and the fact the son wants to go to Freddy’s, even running away
One video game villiain that would be interesting is Dr. Eggman/ Robotnik, only in the games (Sonic Forces specifically) alone he became a dictator in a lot of countries
@@Anxietygirl462 in this case i think every GTA protagonist has a lot of sentences on their back
not to mention its attempted world destruction (several times), enslavement of a race of aliens, universal destruction (partial), infection at a planetary level, and several attempts at world domination.
also destruction of the environment, animal abuse, attempted mass murder
or go full war-crime mode and do robo-robotnik/archie eggman, who is probably THE most evil eggman besides *possibly* sonic the comic(+stc online) eggman
@@emperortoho tecnically,the most evil eggman is the canon one,if you count IDW and prime into the mix.
the guy in sonic generations,literraly attempted to destroy the multiverse,and also reformed to govern the same multiverse (space-time)
@@Sonic2024freedomera
>literally attempted to destroy the multiverse, and also reformed to govern the same universe
archie eggman did that and *succeeded*, earth post super genesis wave was half ruled by eggman even with sonic’s interference
and he accomplished the same thing the metal virus did except it didn’t turn against him and lasted for over a decade
8:46 i like how this implies William Afton is 4' tall
He’s wearing his invisible very very high heels
4:05 The player didn’t die plus what about the Phone guy death?
6:51 I would say identity theft but that is probably the closest thing that I could get to
That or brain washing
@@shannonhopper2141or psychological/emotional abuse
I’d say it constitutes more towards blackmail/manipulation and identity theft. Considering the action was against Vanny’s wishes, and also that the ordeal was carried out someone bearing Vanny’s appearance.
Fredbears mouth only needed a flat piece of metal to work, unless it had a set movement pattern that it was programed to follow there should've been no reason to why Freadbears mouth could've killed a child.
He could survive that life sentence and those years because………
I ALWAYS COME BACK
(2:56) im not a lawyer or anything, it could be argued that William could also get a Charge for Child neglect given how William allowed Crying child's older Brother to scare and bully him so many times to the point he was having Mental breakdowns being near and god forbid inside Fredbears family diner and not once has William realized that Micheal would take the Pranks too far that resulted in crying childs demise.
Fr tho
Rip Child
First Degree Child Murder
Sentence: Death
4:17
For your information, William didnt burn the pizzeria, Micheal did
No it was faulty wiring made by Henry he made the attraction
@@メンタルハザード the first thing would do if he saw Springtrap is dissemble him then burn the pizzeria
The burning of Fazbear’s Fright was caused due to foul play by his son, Michael. Which would inherently cause blame due to “destruction of property” and “negligence” but as Michael is old enough to take responsibility for his actions, the blame would fall to him. But in any case, Afton would have to face the “negligence” charge, considering he was responsible for the upbringing of his child.
Souls of the kids: haha you are dead
Wiliam Afton: I always come back...
His remnant experiments could also fall under illegal experimentation since he’s doing all of this without any known license or authorized equipment and the like. It could also fall under torture.
We could also add child abuse in the case of the movie because Mike says to Vanessa “He really messed you up, didn’t he?” Implying that he abused her. And he even deflects blame onto her for all that’s happened in the movie. Murder, kidnapping, abuse, torture, etc. which were all his doing and fault.
2:38 the crying child is one of William’s sons, so this would count under child negligence, child murder, corporate manslaughter, and violation of OSHA regulations.
Not to mention it was micheal afton who did it.
@@JesseGray-ce6fi not to mention William owns Fredbear and Friends Family Diner
@@cyrix6165 I’m saying it’s also on micheal for doing that
@@JesseGray-ce6fi the Child Negligence charge still applies
I find it strange, Does a regular murderer who kills Adults get the same amount of harsh treatment than Child Murder?, Child Murder is the most cowardly thing a Human can do.
You should do a video of William Afton getting executed by the electric chair.
He just sentences people. He doesn’t attend executions.
@@rodian_skypyratz6181 Ah ok
"Let's motivate this old Springbonnie with a controlled shock!"
4:21 It was either Henry or Michael. Even if it was Will, you can’t charge him cause he’s legally dead
Remember his iconic line? He always comes back.
Technically Michael getting scooped was more so mutilation than murder or gross negligence
for the death sentence...
"I always come back"
4:37
In the salvage minigame, failing and getting jumpscared doesn't cause a game over, but just losing the salvages fee and having the animatronic roam in the vents.
So technically charging him there wouldn't be right, as he doesn't kill anyone. Although just moments later he can do so during the night so this comment is entirely irrelevant and unneccessarily nitpicky
William Afton you have been sentenced to death.
“I always come back”
Nine Times
I don't think he can survive being thrown into a volcano, that could legitimately kill william afton after His "Death" and if Not it could at least keep him trapped for a long time.
@@pikaland3852 where’d you get volcano from 🤨
@@nix0pluto Fire weakening remnant and besides the Heat would likely destroy the Agony infused Metal. I came up with the idea When I thought about something I saw From a reddit post about fighting The different FNAF Characters.
good luck comming back from nine death sentences buddy!
Would you consider taking control of vanny and transferring his digital consciousness into her to be a form of identity theft?
Great video, man. Congrats on 200K. The only thing missing is a child abuse charge for movie William and how he treated Vanessa as a child. If you were including the books, you could add another child abuse charge for Elizabeth Afton because he slaps her at least once out of anger.
Also implied in midnight mortist he was abusive towards his youngest son
@@oofyeet5935 With some theories, it gets even worse; he basically completely ignored the Crying Child during the entirety of FNAF 4, and only showed an ounce of emotion after the Bite of '83. He didn't even stop Michael/ the Brother (if it's not Michael) from harassing and eventually inadvertently murdering CC, even though he was likely working at the place that day.
6:02 I think it would count because whatever happened to the kids happened to Micheal, instead of a Freddy suit it was his own skin where he became living.
(again you could ask how that same thing doesn’t happen to normal people, but this is a series where Chuck E. Cheese attacks random people)
if i know correctly, WIllam Afton dismantled the 4 main animatronics at Freddy Fazbear's pizza yes? im typing this halfway through the video, but i think that Willam Afton would recive a charge for destruction of company property, but idk
"and because I *like* charging people, **arson**"
Such a fantastic line and truly made my day.
I love that this is every charge he could ever receive throughout every universe
Since when were the Shadow Animatronics possessed?
"Another day another victory for the OG 😎"- William Afton
Objection: If I am correct the actual Sister location bunker is located under a warehouse not his house.
As for the thing with the spring-locks. It is said that they are designed to fail and snap shut when they get wet to protect the Animatronic. The reason for the crying child’s death was due to Michael and his friends shoving him into Fredbear’s mouth and his tears getting onto the spring-locks causing them to nap shut. Not sure if that is an objection though.
It wouldn't really prevent his corporate manslaughter charge
The police and investigators to Willam Afton: “I promise. I will prove you guilty, the court will find you guilty, for all the blood you spilled”!
Willam: “……You can’t”.😈
Remember guys, even if he gets any sentences he will always come back.
I think the Springtrap jumpscares shouldn't have been counted as murder charges, because they didn't canonically happen
The intent was definitely there so i let it pass.
@@guythathatesbull462then its attempted manslaughter
Free william he didnt do nothing wrong
Also, the one in the salvage minigame should have been labeled as "assault", since when you fail a salvage minigame, after the animatronic attacks you, they hide in the pizzeria and you don't get salvage money
In the pit game Springtrap shiftshade into someone’s dad A.K.A stolen identity
6:18 He designed the scooper to scoop animatronic parts, not humans, so he should not be accountable
I agree
@@Gamegod-st1hz Actually, looking back at this, im wrong. He knew there were killer animatronics in the basement and left them with a death weapon, and he sent his son down there. So he can be charged for ignorance.
The scooper was created for harvesting remnant. He knew what it would’ve done. Would William have known Michael would’ve been undead by the scooper? No, but it is still gross negligence because… well, yes.
6:13 well, I don’t think William is at fault for this. He designed the scooper to be made to dismantle animatronics. It *would* be gross negligence that Michael died, HOWEVER, it is not a person/worker who caused the death of Michael. A sentient robot wishing to steal the skin of a person caused the death of Michael. William could get slapped with a “creating dangerous robots that kill people” fine.
I believe Henry Emily designed the scooper, as can be seen in fnaf 6 during the insanity ending
@@skylovescars69420the blueprints literally say "Afton Robotics LLC"
Also, mutilation, considering what happens to Michael
It's so funny to me how William Afton's sentence is worse than DEADPOOL because of the death sentence
3:04 not only did he create them, but they were created under the corporation Afton robotics his own company he unlike the last incident has full responsibility
True, all of the plan was his idea, with the obvious exception being the target, who was his daughter.