Quentin Tarantino reacts to the work of David Cronenberg. Source: Eli Roth's History of Horror Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast... Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/4djlRs0...
Same VideoDrome is my favorite movie of all time and Cronenberg is my favorite director and I watch it at least once a month Cronenberg is amazing especially his early work Long Live The New Flesh
The way Tarantino talks about the actors, mentioning their names, creating connections with other similar actors and explaining that he has seen them in other films. Jeez, that guy is a true encyclopedia of cinema.
Well, that's possible for that era, as there wasn't internet, home video, or home porn channels, yet. You literally had to go to a theater to see porn, then. Tarantino was only about 10 when "Behind the Green Door" came out. He likely HADN'T seen her in much, yet.
I just watched Rabid for the first time a couple of months ago and I can't believe it is as unknown as it is. A terrific movie with Cronenberg written all over it.
I love Tarantino's take on movies. I'm about the same age as him and his experiences going to some of these movies really takes me back. Back in the day you had to see these on the big screen (prior to home video) and it made films more memorable, for sure.
Rabid was the first time Cronenberg really showed what he would become. Such cool, atmospheric photography. Perhaps I'm alone in this, but my favourites are some of the more "commercial" ones. The Fly and A History of Violence are so good.
Ya I'm with you on that...I like low budget but only when its really tightly edited. The celebration. Blair Witch, Evil Dead. The later Cronenburg with better financing are much better films. I agree on: the Fly, History of Violence....both so memorable.
DC has never made a bad film, ever. If you were strict, you could say his career amounted to a mixed bag of highs, lows and in-between, but his consistency over the past 50 years (give or take) has been pretty astounding and no other filmmaker comes to mind that you can really say that about.
I can do that, too. I remember thousands of films I've seen over the decades. But I haven't got a shred of Quentin's own talent, unfortunately. Our love of films and remembering them well is where the similarities end, LOL.
That's true. I think that's due to the fact that it came out very, very close to other good/great virtual reality and neo-noir movies like The Matrix, and Dark City, and the 13th Floor. Basically, The Matrix overshadowed the other three movies (eXistenZ, 13th Floor, Dark City)
Scanners is better than The Fury indeed, but Taratino doesn't seem to get that they're very different movies besides the mental powers thing. De Palma's movie is spectacularly filmed, but it's a more typical thriller about government conspiracies. Cronenberg's movie, on the other hand, is tematically more interesting because it deals with the consequences of medical research in private corporations, among other things. It also has a stark, cold atmosphere that I really like. On the other hand, I agree with Tarantino about Marilyn Chambers in Rabid. She was very good in that movie.
@@fmellish71 😂Well maybe they should've watched more of her movies. She emotes passion , fury and a nuanced touch of vulnerability in all of her films. In my view she should've been an Oscar winner for her work in Lusty Busty Fantasies. A pure cinematic masterpiece!
Cinephiles are well aware of Brian De Palma's status and appreciate him, but when you look at the status of his friends, Scorsese-Lucas-Spielberg and Coppola, the four of them are well appreciated and they have received awards for their achievements but when I say underestimated, I think even De Palma underestimated himself. While he is the most powerful in filmmaking and does what Cronenberg and Carpenter Scorsese are known for as well and maybe better.@@oedipamaas2067
My bro bought me the blu ray criterion Scanners for xmas years back. I hadn't seen it at the time. He just asked me what I wanted and I told him criterion blu rays. No specific ones, just surprise me. I am glad he picked Scanners though because I really enjoy it. The criterion copy also has probably the coolest box art next to repo man and silence of the lambs, both of which are also in my collection.
Villeneuve is crap .... Every movie I try to watch of his feels so hollow but disguised as something profound and artsy. He reminds me of Christopher Nolan except boring. I don't like Nolan either, ... but I don't find him boring .. just frustrating.
I was kinda forced into watching The Brood on vhs video in 1979 when I was 8. I can't watch it again as it affected me (especially the scened when the mother ripped open her stomach to pull a baby out).
Cronenberg is a master of horror cinema. And hearing Tarantino talk about him is just so unbelievable and awsome for me. (Also thank you James Whale Bake Sale for this channel and especially this video)
I don't know, man. I generally agree with Tarantino's takes but calling Scanners The Fury part 2 is a bit weird. Carrie, The Sender, Scanners, The Clairvoyant, Dreamscape? All are featuring people with psychic powers and horror elements. It's just a microgenre that comes and goes like any other.
But all the stuff that Quentin is championing in Rabid was already present in Cronenberg's first feature, They Come from Within/Shivers. Infection spreading and everything. When I first saw Rabid I was disppointed because I'd already seen that stuff in Shivers and I thought that was the rougher and more interesting film. Quentin's not wrong about Rabid, but I'm shocked he hadn't seen Shivers.
@1:43 "Toronto is in flames..." Rabid (and Shivers) were both shot and set in and around Montreal. It wasn't until The Brood did he start shooting in Toronto
Easily my favurite director, so many incredible movies in his mid period that have left a mark on me: Scanners, Spider, Videodrome, Dead Ringers, Crash, eXistenZ,The Fly. All perfect. His son's movies are fantastic too.
Naked Lunch is one of his very best films. People often forget about that one, as it was quickly pulled from theaters (like Crash) for being too commercially unappealing.
Oh man. Cronenberg was an important part of my childhood. It was like, I knew I was going to get some body horror, but I didn't KNOW what I was going to get. And it was always wrapped inside a pretty intelligent premise or story so it never felt like just pure exploitation.
Seeing Rabid so many years ago and Marilyn Chambers absolutely had an actors presence, with some more acting chops she could have certainly excelled in that art in a big way.
Cronenberg´s best movie will always be The Fly. It´s one of the best remakes ever made, better than the original. People don´t like to assume that because it´s a remake.
Cronenberg doesn’t pad time in his films w/ long-winded conversations that have nothing to do w/ the main plot. Unlike the guy offering his opinion of Canada’s excellent export.
Dead Zone is awesome …but it was def not a tv movie ..you may be thinking of the long running tv show of the same name with Anthony Micheal Hall..he plays the Walken character 😎
Cronenberg's horror movies were a subset of what I call Infection Films. Rabid is an obvious example. However even films like The Brood and Scanners though not specifically about infections deal with a sort of internal disorder. Infected minds really.
"And im like, HEY, this is gettin kind of rough!" - I wish I could watch a film in a theater sitting next to Quentin. I swear, he could probably charge $5,000.00 a ticket..........
A History of Violence is good, but it’s not better than his best horror movie stuff before that point. It’s also not the first time he moved outside of horror.
Videodrone or A history of Violence, Eastern promises is not bad either. Scanners is really only good for the first 20 minutes I definitely agree with that. The Fly is also pretty good but I’m sticking with Videodrone for the win “Long live the new flesh”
Please explain what there is to like about this movie? I just don’t get it. It’s One of the worst and dumbest films I’ve ever seen in my life. It’s filled with plot holes, totally unbelievable, he did absolutely no research whatsoever and it’s filled with senseless violence just for the sake of it - he literally built the entire film around that stupid bath-house scene. Vigo’s character was the only slightly interesting/redeeming quality of the film. Otherwise it was a hot steaming pile of garbage. I want two hours of my life back.
@@walkerhull8405I love every shot of Easetern Promises so it will be difficult for me to summarise. I love the way on first viewing you feel like Vigos character is a good guy despite tons of evidence to the contrary, and on repeat viewings you can focus on the lengths to which he is going to remain undercover. Also the graphic violence and sex scenes are filmed in such a way that i feel like i understand the gravity of each situation whereas in most films i would just remain desensitized.
no mention of Videodrome is simply absurd, which makes sense, considering this is Tarantino. "best part of Scanners is that whole opening 20 minutes, where all the agents are out there trying to kill each other." of course that's your favorite part of the movie, Tarantino, of course LOL
Frank Moore doesn´t look nothing like John Savage. He looks like Christopher Walken. Quentin Tarantino´s eyes are only good to steal from others it seems.
I had to look this director up, Videodrome gave me the feeling Quentin had when I was a kid. I'm not a movie person at all, hardly watch anything since 1995. Naked Lunch (liked movie better than book, hardly ever have said that), The Dead Zone and Videodrome were interesting to me. Seen The Fly but that didn't catch me, may have to look at a few more. Did see scanners as well.
@@fnordiumendures138 but I think that's exactly the point. You see, anyone who has seen his earlier bizarre, surrealist films would find movies like Eastern Promises or A History of Violence as offbeat for him, but he did them and he was great. I felt they were truly mature work, not by its content but by artistic values.
Do people here think that because Tarintinos films are entertaining that makes them not as good as serious movies or what? Just a little advice for you, people who actually like proper cinephile arthouse films find those films entertaining too. And they also find Tarintino movies entertaining because their entertaining, just because his films are irrevant or not entitely serious doesnt make them less artistic in fact it makes them more so. Pulp Fiction is a more artistic film then cronenberg has ever made, your used to its structure so you think it's not that impressive but find a film that does the same thing that Pulp Fiction does. And in fact look at all the films that tried and failed in the late 90s early 00s.
Cronenberg is a genius. His entire career is full of masterpieces.
DEAD RINGERS does me in every time. What a performance by Jeremy Irons
My heart will always belong to Videodrome
Long live the new flesh!
@@GoomiesBeat me to it!
I think it gets a little bit silly near the end
Same VideoDrome is my favorite movie of all time and Cronenberg is my favorite director and I watch it at least once a month Cronenberg is amazing especially his early work Long Live The New Flesh
Long live the new flesh
Cronenberg's The Fly is one of the best sci-fi/horror remakes of all time.
Fly is sublime. Goldblum is peerless there. Never bettered.
Most horror remakes suck
@@markoragnos6757if the flys sublime what's La Dolce Vita
Along with The Thing and Invasion Of The Body Snatchers (Jeff Goldblum again)
Yes it was perfect horror
The way Tarantino talks about the actors, mentioning their names, creating connections with other similar actors and explaining that he has seen them in other films. Jeez, that guy is a true encyclopedia of cinema.
I could listen to Tarantino talk about movies all day.
I could watch him talk about radio all night too!
"I barely knew who Marilyn Chambers was." Riiiight
Well, that's possible for that era, as there wasn't internet, home video, or home porn channels, yet. You literally had to go to a theater to see porn, then. Tarantino was only about 10 when "Behind the Green Door" came out. He likely HADN'T seen her in much, yet.
Q knew who Marylin was. His right hand knew.
Scanners really blew my mind. 😏
Pivotal achievement of a thought, this film is
Leading actors' performance in Scanners always made me think of how a human answering machine would sound and interact with its surroundings.
I just watched Rabid for the first time a couple of months ago and I can't believe it is as unknown as it is. A terrific movie with Cronenberg written all over it.
I love Tarantino's take on movies. I'm about the same age as him and his experiences going to some of these movies really takes me back. Back in the day you had to see these on the big screen (prior to home video) and it made films more memorable, for sure.
Not directed by Cronenberg, but he plays in it: _Nightbreed_ (1990). Directed by Clive Barker. Never seen anything like it, very awesome.
Also, it is an example of a film where the studio cut is vastly superior to the director's cut.
Rabid was the first time Cronenberg really showed what he would become. Such cool, atmospheric photography. Perhaps I'm alone in this, but my favourites are some of the more "commercial" ones. The Fly and A History of Violence are so good.
Ya I'm with you on that...I like low budget but only when its really tightly edited. The celebration. Blair Witch, Evil Dead. The later Cronenburg with better financing are much better films. I agree on: the Fly, History of Violence....both so memorable.
First time I saw Rabid you could “see” the Cronenberg dread and His signature unhappy ending.
DC has never made a bad film, ever. If you were strict, you could say his career amounted to a mixed bag of highs, lows and in-between, but his consistency over the past 50 years (give or take) has been pretty astounding and no other filmmaker comes to mind that you can really say that about.
@@michaelcruz8312 Scorsese.
he had his style down from the beginning... crimes of the future and so on
A History of Violence deserves more respect &Kudos
Nah that shiii a$$
It's so great to have this addition to the public "infected people movie" dialogue!
Tarantino's ability to remember so many scenes from a million movies is quite staggering!!
That's how he is such a great writer, he said he remembers a lot of weird stuff people say
I can do that, too. I remember thousands of films I've seen over the decades. But I haven't got a shred of Quentin's own talent, unfortunately. Our love of films and remembering them well is where the similarities end, LOL.
Rabid just doesn't get enough love. Glad QT mentioned it.
So what that QT mentioned it ? Has the world of cinema changed ?
Existenz is a highly, HIGHLY underrated little known David Cronenberg movie
That's true. I think that's due to the fact that it came out very, very close to other good/great virtual reality and neo-noir movies like The Matrix, and Dark City, and the 13th Floor.
Basically, The Matrix overshadowed the other three movies (eXistenZ, 13th Floor, Dark City)
Brilliant movie, only just now getting some recognition
@@jf1573Dark City was dope. Love that flick.
Scanners is better than The Fury indeed, but Taratino doesn't seem to get that they're very different movies besides the mental powers thing. De Palma's movie is spectacularly filmed, but it's a more typical thriller about government conspiracies. Cronenberg's movie, on the other hand, is tematically more interesting because it deals with the consequences of medical research in private corporations, among other things. It also has a stark, cold atmosphere that I really like. On the other hand, I agree with Tarantino about Marilyn Chambers in Rabid. She was very good in that movie.
You know movies more than the guy that made Pulp Fiction definitely
Yea QT is full of shit
Marilyn should've made more mainstream movies ... But Rabid has nothing on her seminal films Insatiable 1 and 2. Pure artistry.
@@Fiveash-Art Well, I'm sure she was unfortunately not very highly considered due to her porn career
@@fmellish71 😂Well maybe they should've watched more of her movies. She emotes passion , fury and a nuanced touch of vulnerability in all of her films. In my view she should've been an Oscar winner for her work in Lusty Busty Fantasies. A pure cinematic masterpiece!
Cronenbergs videodrome is my favorite
Brian DePalma had done so many incredible stuff before Scorsese and Cronenberg. UNDERRATED FILMMAKER
Cinephiles are well aware of Brian De Palma's status and appreciate him, but when you look at the status of his friends, Scorsese-Lucas-Spielberg and Coppola, the four of them are well appreciated and they have received awards for their achievements but when I say underestimated, I think even De Palma underestimated himself. While he is the most powerful in filmmaking and does what Cronenberg and Carpenter Scorsese are known for as well and maybe better.@@oedipamaas2067
Stuff is already plural
I love 'Shivers'! (As does Clive Barker.)
"Wow, this is getting a little rougher than I was expecting". Tarantino has boundaries.
Holy crap, what a treat it is to hear virtuosos talk about craft.
My bro bought me the blu ray criterion Scanners for xmas years back. I hadn't seen it at the time. He just asked me what I wanted and I told him criterion blu rays. No specific ones, just surprise me. I am glad he picked Scanners though because I really enjoy it. The criterion copy also has probably the coolest box art next to repo man and silence of the lambs, both of which are also in my collection.
Videodrome and Naked Lunch
are my favourite movie of all time.
He is like Denis Villeneuve of the 80's.
The only thing Villeneuve and Cronenberg have in common is that they were born in Canada.
Videodrome is Incredible
Villeneuve is crap .... Every movie I try to watch of his feels so hollow but disguised as something profound and artsy. He reminds me of Christopher Nolan except boring. I don't like Nolan either, ... but I don't find him boring .. just frustrating.
I was kinda forced into watching The Brood on vhs video in 1979 when I was 8. I can't watch it again as it affected me (especially the scened when the mother ripped open her stomach to pull a baby out).
Forced into watching the Brood at 8. Bro that's not ok at all. Those movies are disturbing even for an adult mind.
Cronenberg is a master of horror cinema. And hearing Tarantino talk about him is just so unbelievable and awsome for me. (Also thank you James Whale Bake Sale for this channel and especially this video)
Slight correction, Rabid is shot and set in Montreal, Quebec and not Toronto, Ontario.
Scanners is a masterpiece
Love this show. I love cronenburg but I need more, guess I will need to see quentins recommendations.
love the call out to Famous Monsters of Filmland
I don't know, man. I generally agree with Tarantino's takes but calling Scanners The Fury part 2 is a bit weird. Carrie, The Sender, Scanners, The Clairvoyant, Dreamscape? All are featuring people with psychic powers and horror elements. It's just a microgenre that comes and goes like any other.
My head canon is that Cronenberg read some X-Men comics on a bunch of acid and then wrote Scanners
But all the stuff that Quentin is championing in Rabid was already present in Cronenberg's first feature, They Come from Within/Shivers. Infection spreading and everything. When I first saw Rabid I was disppointed because I'd already seen that stuff in Shivers and I thought that was the rougher and more interesting film. Quentin's not wrong about Rabid, but I'm shocked he hadn't seen Shivers.
Would anyone consider "Rabid"the first "28 Days Later"?
The Fly or Videodrome are my favourites
@1:43 "Toronto is in flames..." Rabid (and Shivers) were both shot and set in and around Montreal. It wasn't until The Brood did he start shooting in Toronto
Naked Lunch is my favorite Cronenberg film
It's cause it doesn't feature his dialogue lol
I love Scanners. It is the movie that is closest to witnessing a recorded dream/nightmare than any other movie for me. Deliciously creepy.
Cosmopolis is one of my favourite movies and I still have no idea why
Tarantino films have always had the same style of lighting and color saturation as Cronenberg films, kind of somber but intense.
Easily my favurite director, so many incredible movies in his mid period that have left a mark on me: Scanners, Spider, Videodrome, Dead Ringers, Crash, eXistenZ,The Fly. All perfect. His son's movies are fantastic too.
Naked Lunch is one of his very best films. People often forget about that one, as it was quickly pulled from theaters (like Crash) for being too commercially unappealing.
Oh man. Cronenberg was an important part of my childhood. It was like, I knew I was going to get some body horror, but I didn't KNOW what I was going to get.
And it was always wrapped inside a pretty intelligent premise or story so it never felt like just pure exploitation.
I thought I’d pretty much seen it all ….until Crimes of the Future came along…….still processing it a year later 😮
Seeing Rabid so many years ago and Marilyn Chambers absolutely had an actors presence, with some more acting chops she could have certainly excelled in that art in a big way.
In the DVD commentary, he said he was surprised she didn't try to build on the success of the film. She just went back to what she knew.
I'll never forget watching Crash, MY first Cronenberg film, when I was like 12 or so.
Needless to say, it made QUITE an impression on me lol
Never got the big deal about Crash
you watched that when you were 12??!!!
Haha. 12?!??! Watching "Crash"?!?!?
I have the criterion and still haven’t watched it......
It made an impression on me too. I can't get hard unless I see a car accident
History of violence is my favorite cronenberg
The Brood was phenomenal
Cronenberg´s best movie will always be The Fly. It´s one of the best remakes ever made, better than the original. People don´t like to assume that because it´s a remake.
Cronenberg doesn’t pad time in his films w/ long-winded conversations that have nothing to do w/ the main plot. Unlike the guy offering his opinion of Canada’s excellent export.
Naked Lunch was a masterpiece.
Yes. That film and Crash was Cronenberg at his most cutting edge. Both had very short theatrical runs as they were too commercially unappealing.
Love Scanners and can’t remember The Fury….for what that’s worth. Which one is better? Hmm.
Scanners. The effects are more startling, and The Fury has a great cast but it’s a VERY stupid movie.
Naked Lunch and The Fly are my favourite Cronenberg movies, but I also have soft spot for Dead Zone, even tho it’s a tv movie
Dead Zone is awesome …but it was def not a tv movie ..you may be thinking of the long running tv show of the same name with Anthony Micheal Hall..he plays the Walken character 😎
"SCANNERS would be better than THE FURY, if it wasn't for Stephen Lack." Haha ! and quite true too !
Cronenberg's horror movies were a subset of what I call Infection Films. Rabid is an obvious example.
However even films like The Brood and Scanners though not specifically about infections deal with a sort of internal disorder. Infected minds really.
"And im like, HEY, this is gettin kind of rough!" - I wish I could watch a film in a theater sitting next to Quentin. I swear, he could probably charge $5,000.00 a ticket..........
Would've been nice to see Michael Ironside in a Tarantino film
Agree, he would have to fire an Uzi from the hip and get his arms chopped off though
A.k.a. Sam Fisher!
Hell yes!
"What the fuck is this guy?!" --summarizing all audience reaction to Stephen Lack's performance in Scanners.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'd love to know his opinion about Brandon Cronenberg and his films, that would be a lot of fun to listen to, I'm sure.
A history of violence shows Cronenberg is more than just a horror director.
He's a genius when it comes to film.
A History of Violence is good, but it’s not better than his best horror movie stuff before that point. It’s also not the first time he moved outside of horror.
Eastern Promises is very good, too.
What about Shivers man, an underrated masterpiece
I Adore Shivers!
Crap.
Isn’t shivers Rabid ?
Montreal, not Toronto.
Videodrone or A history of Violence, Eastern promises is not bad either. Scanners is really only good for the first 20 minutes I definitely agree with that. The Fly is also pretty good but I’m sticking with Videodrone for the win
“Long live the new flesh”
Always thought Frank Moore in Rabid looks & sounds a lot like Dennis Hopper.
Ray-bid, please!
That’s Micheal Ironside!!!!!!
(Thumbnail)
It wasn't Toronto. It was Montreal.
There’s only one thing QT does better than make his own movies and that’s talk about other people’s movies.
Cronenberg definitely has a way of disturbing me more than most other film makers.
These are too short! Let them go for over 3 minutes!
I'd say Frank Moore looks more like Christopher Walken than John Savage.
How was this movie not pushed all over the place during Covid?
Should have finished Babadook. Pretty tame ending.
Funny that he calls out Stephan Lack. I felt he was a bit...well...lacking.
I just rewatched rabid great movie. Cronenberg has lots of classics love scanners and eastern promises. History of violence.
I think eastern promises is his best
In my top 3 favourite films.
Like M. Butterfly or A History of Violence, Eastern Promises is a compelling drama but it’s not what one typically classifies a “Cronenberg film”.
Please explain what there is to like about this movie? I just don’t get it. It’s One of the worst and dumbest films I’ve ever seen in my life. It’s filled with plot holes, totally unbelievable, he did absolutely no research whatsoever and it’s filled with senseless violence just for the sake of it - he literally built the entire film around that stupid bath-house scene. Vigo’s character was the only slightly interesting/redeeming quality of the film. Otherwise it was a hot steaming pile of garbage. I want two hours of my life back.
@@walkerhull8405I love every shot of Easetern Promises so it will be difficult for me to summarise. I love the way on first viewing you feel like Vigos character is a good guy despite tons of evidence to the contrary, and on repeat viewings you can focus on the lengths to which he is going to remain undercover. Also the graphic violence and sex scenes are filmed in such a way that i feel like i understand the gravity of each situation whereas in most films i would just remain desensitized.
@@walkerhull8405 Those are a lot of words with no substance. You didn't like it because "it was dumb" and "it's garbage".
Wow, what a critic 🤡
man it's difficult to follow him sometimes. his thoughts are all over the place
THE BROOD \m/
"The Fury" is fun, but not well thought out. "Scanners" is a better script.
no mention of Videodrome is simply absurd, which makes sense, considering this is Tarantino. "best part of Scanners is that whole opening 20 minutes, where all the agents are out there trying to kill each other." of course that's your favorite part of the movie, Tarantino, of course LOL
I would have much rather of seen a Chronenburgers then Walburgers? Chronenburger with cheese hold the fly and an order of Rabid McNuggets please.
To me he's more like a poor mans Christopher Walken.
its called rabid not rabbit
Frank Moore doesn´t look nothing like John Savage. He looks like Christopher Walken. Quentin Tarantino´s eyes are only good to steal from others it seems.
Scanners started out good then became very boring.
The John Savage looking guy 😂
Scanners is boring as hell but the ending fight scene is pretty amazing with that Howard Shore music.
I had to look this director up, Videodrome gave me the feeling Quentin had when I was a kid. I'm not a movie person at all, hardly watch anything since 1995. Naked Lunch (liked movie better than book, hardly ever have said that), The Dead Zone and Videodrome were interesting to me. Seen The Fly but that didn't catch me, may have to look at a few more. Did see scanners as well.
Videodrome
The movie where people get off by getting into car wrecks
Crash.
The Fury sucks. Scanners is the good version of The Fury.
Very forgettable. I will never forget Scanners
Sounds like the Mouth of Madness
A History of Violence is Cronenberg's best film.
Preach
Crash or Spider, for me.
I would say Naked Lunch is his best film
I don't know. It's hard to compare his earlier surrealist films to the later realistic ones. And kind of pointless.
@@fnordiumendures138 but I think that's exactly the point. You see, anyone who has seen his earlier bizarre, surrealist films would find movies like Eastern Promises or A History of Violence as offbeat for him, but he did them and he was great. I felt they were truly mature work, not by its content but by artistic values.
Chinese waiter
Do people here think that because Tarintinos films are entertaining that makes them not as good as serious movies or what? Just a little advice for you, people who actually like proper cinephile arthouse films find those films entertaining too. And they also find Tarintino movies entertaining because their entertaining, just because his films are irrevant or not entitely serious doesnt make them less artistic in fact it makes them more so. Pulp Fiction is a more artistic film then cronenberg has ever made, your used to its structure so you think it's not that impressive but find a film that does the same thing that Pulp Fiction does. And in fact look at all the films that tried and failed in the late 90s early 00s.
Sorry to say folks but I was never a fan of Cronenberg. That whole body horror stuff just wasnt my thing
Hi❤🙂 Tarantino sucks
Scanners was WAY BETTER than Fury by the way
this is what the cronenbergs in Rick and Morty are based on? I learned something. LOL
Watch David Croenenburg's The Fly, that's where Croenenburg's body horror is best known from
Yep. Cronenberg really is that guy.