Khadija رضي الله عنها Was Not 40 When She Got Married

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
  • Shaykh Uthman Ibn Farooq presents clear evidence from the classical texts of Islam to prove that Khadija رضي الله عنها was not 40 when she got married to Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, but rather she was around 25 years of age at the time of marriage.
    DISCLAIMER
    The individuals speaking in this video are solely responsible for their own views and opinions expressed, and they do not necessarily reflect the views of my channel.
    TikTok: @randomdawah
    Instagram: @randomdawah
    Twitter: @randomdawah
    Facebook: @randomdawah

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @arfatalam6122
    @arfatalam6122 Рік тому +4

    This is the reason I hold scholar of hadith most powerful people in destroying doubts and questions. And Fuqaha for giving right fatwa to ensure right ruling is established

  • @SamirSiraj8542
    @SamirSiraj8542 Рік тому +4

    Thanks for the information

  • @UmarIbnAlKhattab1
    @UmarIbnAlKhattab1 Рік тому +1

    The difference between the numbers of narrations for the two opinions is very significant. For the Forty-Year opinion we have three reports from Hakim bin Hizam, one from Nafisa bint Munya, and a report each from al-Zuhri, al-Muttalib bin ‘Abdullah bin Hantab, Hisham bin Muhammad al-Kalbi, Hisham bin ‘Urwa, Muhammad bin Salih, and ‘Abdul Rahman bin ‘Abdul ‘Aziz. On the other hand there are only two reports for the Twenty-Eight-Year opinion - one from Ibn ‘Abbas through the two Kalbis and another from Ibn Ishaq.
    All but one of the narrations for the Forty-Year opinion come through Muhammad bin ‘Umar al-Waqidi who, though severely criticized,[15] is known for his extensive knowledge and is recognized as indispensable when it comes to historical accounts about the biographic details of the companions and the campaigns of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).[16]
    For the Twenty-Eight-Year opinion, the narration from Ibn ‘Abbas comes through the notorious link “Abu Salih - Muhammad bin Sa’ib al-Kalbi” which falls in the “chain of lies.”[17]
    Furthermore, scholars have stated that al-Waqidi, despite the criticism he has received, is far better than the two al-Kalbis. Ibn Taymiyyah states:
    It is known that for people al-Waqidi is better than Hisham bin al-Kalbi and his father Muhammad bin al-Sa’ib and the likes of them.

  • @shareefafatimaal-saqqaf723
    @shareefafatimaal-saqqaf723 Рік тому +3

    As Salaamalaikom,am sorry to say Sir,Khadija (RA)age was 40 not 25.Infact Prophet Muhammad (SAW) age was 25.

    • @SamirSiraj8542
      @SamirSiraj8542 Рік тому +3

      Your source: Trust me bro

    • @SamirSiraj8542
      @SamirSiraj8542 Рік тому +2

      Great scholars like ibn kathir rh said she was (25-28). You are a layman. Your opinion doesn't matter

    • @abdullahassaffah
      @abdullahassaffah Місяць тому

      ​@@SamirSiraj8542you're a layman and not a scholar and majority scholars like ibn taymiyyah have said she was 40 and majority scholars disagreed with ibn Kathir on this matter and majority scholars declared the hadith of 25 and 28 weak and contain narrators especially the two kulbis ad being extremely weak and unreliable

    • @SamirSiraj8542
      @SamirSiraj8542 Місяць тому

      @@abdullahassaffah do you know that there are opinion that Khadijah ra was 28, some said 25 , some said 30, some said 35 , some said 40 , during màrriage. So, scholars differed. Even if I accept your majority claim. I am not obliged to accept it

  • @emmytones8311
    @emmytones8311 Рік тому +1

    How does this channel have 30k subs but less than 300 views in 9 days??? I've never seen such a high sub count but such low views. I'm not even trying to attack, I just find it very strange...

    • @hotlinestudios6058
      @hotlinestudios6058 Рік тому +1

      Cuz not everyone clicked on this video

    • @emmytones8311
      @emmytones8311 Рік тому +1

      @@hotlinestudios6058 that explains it. Thank you captain obvious.

    • @shabs047
      @shabs047 Рік тому +1

      Real reasons if you go through this channel you can see which type of content people see from this channel mainly shorts and almost every short video has 10k+ views so this may be the correct answer to your question

    • @shabs047
      @shabs047 Рік тому +1

      One thing more that this video is not SEO optimized it doesn't have any catchy or even the video title in the thumnail which is giving it no click and thats why YT is not recommending this video

    • @emmytones8311
      @emmytones8311 Рік тому

      @@shabs047 it recommended it to me. 🤷 But yeah that makes sense. I can tell how much Muslims love shorts because that's probably where they all get their same parroted, recycled, unoriginal arguments from them, but none of them have any idea about what they are actually talking about, like another Muslim I'm talking to as well. (Please don't think that I am saying the same about you. I want to make it clear that I am not.)
      1 He comments one verse from scripture.
      2 He asks if God said it.
      3 And demands that I refute a claim or argument, when he hasn't even made one. 🤦🤦🤦
      Thanks for answering my question honestly. It makes total sense.