Розмір відео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показувати елементи керування програвачем
Автоматичне відтворення
Автоповтор
Heck yeah, I’d love to do this to my 9-3!
Μπράβο sifi
Oh that's nice
How much work was it to get the standalone ECU to communicate with the rest of the car? I have a Vectra C with the same engine and would like to go to a modern aftermarket solution to get around some of the limitations with the original Trionic8.
when You compare modded 2.0 9-3 to 2.3 engine on 9-5, which do You think pulls better from lower rpm?
He does not have a clue.....
460bhp maybe? Moves quite decent tho!
I think it's 516 from the other video on the channel
@@heinzketchup3323 Dont wanna be an jerk, but seems like an high figure in comparison to the acceleration time with the known weight of these😅
@@ArturssonEngineering no worries, I’m just guessing it’s the same car as the last video (also a Saab, 516hp)
@@heinzketchup3323 He said that was crank power so 450 or so would be a good wheel horsepower figure to base off of
@@nikdelano oops, missed that, you’re right!
Heck yeah, I’d love to do this to my 9-3!
Μπράβο sifi
Oh that's nice
How much work was it to get the standalone ECU to communicate with the rest of the car? I have a Vectra C with the same engine and would like to go to a modern aftermarket solution to get around some of the limitations with the original Trionic8.
when You compare modded 2.0 9-3 to 2.3 engine on 9-5, which do You think pulls better from lower rpm?
He does not have a clue.....
460bhp maybe? Moves quite decent tho!
I think it's 516 from the other video on the channel
@@heinzketchup3323 Dont wanna be an jerk, but seems like an high figure in comparison to the acceleration time with the known weight of these😅
@@ArturssonEngineering no worries, I’m just guessing it’s the same car as the last video (also a Saab, 516hp)
@@heinzketchup3323 He said that was crank power so 450 or so would be a good wheel horsepower figure to base off of
@@nikdelano oops, missed that, you’re right!