Apparently Seiko had always bad finishes! Darth Tuna SBBN011 Review & Insights

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @stevefox8605
    @stevefox8605 3 роки тому +13

    29 already!!! That's gone quickly!
    Seiko Tuna....I shouldn't like it - quartz, day/date, funny shape- but for me it's pretty much the definition of a tool watch & therefore really cool. Good choice, great review. Cheers 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +2

      :D 29, yup! time is indeed passing. Yup not a diver for everyone, but as you said, a genuine tool. Cheers.

    • @anthonysmith2982
      @anthonysmith2982 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, well said Steve.
      It just doesn't appeal to me. It's a taste thing. I didn't even get as far as considering the quartz mov't., and tbh, that might've put me off too?
      If I'm ever asked what type of watches I like the answer is re-issue tool & military pieces at ~$1K.
      So, in other words: watches like this.
      During the last few months I've started to realise how conservative my taste is, and I don't like thinking of myself as conservative!

  • @yaaxarr8977
    @yaaxarr8977 3 роки тому +9

    As Tuna enthusiast I learned to love high torque quartz and a great engineered movement. I have a girly wrist but with my SBBN017 never have to complain or suffer due Tuna’s specifications. Great beater watches! 👊🏻

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +4

      haha, that's the spirit, no matter the wrist size, uf you love it, wear it! i am with you here!

    • @yaaxarr8977
      @yaaxarr8977 3 роки тому +1

      @@BraveBeaters Ty Bro !! Please stay safe and keep the great work

    • @ph69jbl
      @ph69jbl 3 роки тому +1

      @@yaaxarr8977 My love for Tunas started with a sbbn017 and I was a bit afraid of that one given the paper dimensions. Later on I tried the darth and apart from the height (which you ll get used to it) from wearability perspective the 300m and 1000m (quartz not automatic…) wear fairly similar!

    • @anthonysmith2982
      @anthonysmith2982 3 роки тому +1

      Yeah, well said.
      I don't own a Tuna but I do own a Bulova Lunar Pilot and 'serious' quartz movements are frickin' incredible and no watch enthusiast should write off such mov'ts simply because they're battery powered.

    • @yaaxarr8977
      @yaaxarr8977 3 роки тому +1

      @@anthonysmith2982 Now, I am pointing to have my first Lunar Pilot with the new Limite Edition Titanium case. Yes, I speak quartz ! I should recommend you to have a Tuna with the 7C46 caliber the second hand hits every indexes so satisfying to see how accurate it is this movement.

  • @BobMarley-pm1xb
    @BobMarley-pm1xb 3 роки тому +2

    Excellent vid Andrei!

  • @alexstrat
    @alexstrat 2 роки тому +1

    Great review! I got the SNE557 and I love it.

  • @petermulhall2564
    @petermulhall2564 3 роки тому +2

    I love your videos man,very cool how you shoot them,thank you👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @cozminpreda
    @cozminpreda 3 роки тому +2

    Another great video, and very cool informations about Seiko's history!

  • @SoCalWatchReviews
    @SoCalWatchReviews 3 роки тому +3

    Another great video my brother 👏

  • @NPBJBJ
    @NPBJBJ Рік тому +2

    where to buy the red strap at 6:22

  • @nomadartist3772
    @nomadartist3772 2 роки тому +1

    Great job, informative and comprehensive !!! 👍 Just want this to be perfect !!! Apparently there is a typo. 😢 Darth Tuna 1 is "SBBN011", not "SBBN001" as shown in the description and mentioned with a graphic @7:07. SBBN001 is the JDM titanium Ashtray Tuna from 1986. I enjoyed it, well done, thanks.

  • @JasonTheWatchGuy
    @JasonTheWatchGuy 3 роки тому +4

    I'm a big fan of the Tuna, for all its faults it is fantastic to be fair.

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому

      Tuna is cool :) can't wait to add an iconic piece to my collection!

  • @larsstougaard7097
    @larsstougaard7097 3 роки тому +3

    Great video ⌚, is the music made by Seiko ? 😄

  • @jaybee1196
    @jaybee1196 3 роки тому +3

    excellent vid

  • @Matt-uq3in
    @Matt-uq3in 10 місяців тому

    Lovely tuna, I have tunas in my collection I'm looking for 013 at the moment 😊.

  • @adamigo1000
    @adamigo1000 3 роки тому +3

    I wonder if you wear this darth tuna on your wrist, do you often bump this watch on things in your surroundings?

    • @ph69jbl
      @ph69jbl 3 роки тому +2

      You tend to do that at first but in couple of days you get used to the thickness and wear her just like any other diver. And even if you do bump her of things around you, don t worry… “the things” will survive. Bruised, but alive :)

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +2

      Boom! Straight from the owner! Razvan had the watch during His vacation. was sending constant updates from the beach while i was making the video :D

  • @markwoods2800
    @markwoods2800 3 роки тому +2

    Great video. I'm not a fan of the Tuna but see it's merits as a design. I own a couple of the models you mention (including the SPB199J1) and a SKX013. I bought the SKX 013 recently at a sensible price. It is a great watch albeit with it's rudimentary movement. But that was always the charm of Seiko for me. It remains to be seen what will happen with the Seiko brand going forward. Is it the end of their entry level ISO rated divers? Yes. :( The legacy watches will continue to rise in price on the second hand market... perhaps to a level where people will begin to get them serviced... :D

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you for your thoughts, Mark! indeed, the end of an era for affordable ISO divers. and the beggining of celebration watches made for profit. But yes, From time to time, you can still find 6R Sarbs or non Prospex grails for decent prices.

    • @M3LTUP
      @M3LTUP 3 роки тому +1

      Believe you are correct. Seems like Seiko is making less ISO rated divers under $500. I believe most of the SKX series will be highly collectible in 5-10yrs.

  • @verykeen2please
    @verykeen2please 3 роки тому +3

    another great shirt

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +2

      ahahahaha, I wanted to connect a bit with the vacation vibe, I am currently on "vacation" filming divers on the beach :D

    • @ph69jbl
      @ph69jbl 3 роки тому

      @@BraveBeaters which ones??? :)

    • @verykeen2please
      @verykeen2please 3 роки тому

      @@BraveBeaters have a great time on holiday and I will look forward to the video

  • @M3LTUP
    @M3LTUP 3 роки тому +2

    I have the SNE498(Solar Gold Tuna). It has been a good watch. I believe it has been discontinued. But im not 100% sure on that.

  • @WesWatchRoom
    @WesWatchRoom 3 роки тому +4

    That's not good, shows what Seikos prioritise when it comes to making watches. Really great video.

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +3

      Thank you very much :) it is indeed a thing that they continue to make already for quite some years...

  • @pinkbono
    @pinkbono 3 роки тому

    Thx for the video, perfect as usual.
    This Tuna has absolutely zero sex appeal to me, zero vibration, zero emotion.

  • @watchroll3310
    @watchroll3310 7 місяців тому

    Brother for this type of watches try a divecore. they support 2.5mm springbars. They are something else.

  • @laszloszentirmai2280
    @laszloszentirmai2280 3 роки тому +2

    I've seen only one watch, what was perfect, I mean, with no imperfections. A Breitling Avenger 2 Seawolf with black Combat Dial. Owned and seen lot of watches, even Tudors and JLCs have imperfections, someways Breitlings are really good in this "not a simple dust particle on dial" point of view. :D

    • @michaelriera6277
      @michaelriera6277 3 роки тому +1

      I agree. Breitling takes tremendous care in quality control. Love my Colt 41 and Super Ocean.

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому

      Never experienced a brietling from macro level, but i assume, they finish the watches accordingly :)

  • @ericgrace9995
    @ericgrace9995 3 роки тому

    Seiko just brought out the ultimate "desk diver". It costs around $3000, has a truly beautiful dial...with a pair of matching cuff links
    Tool watch ??

  • @ph69jbl
    @ph69jbl 2 роки тому +2

    Guess who’s back in the collection … :)

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  2 роки тому +1

      Welcome back, Darth! :)

    • @ph69jbl
      @ph69jbl Рік тому

      Apparently I am going back in circles… :)))

  • @b.2221
    @b.2221 3 роки тому +2

    👍.

  • @anthonysmith2982
    @anthonysmith2982 3 роки тому +3

    Argh! Seiko...
    A frustrating brand. My Champagne Alpinist is one of my favourite pieces. On a Jubilee bracelet it has the elegance of a Datejust and the capabilities (... + double the WR) of an Explorer. It's a watch that I don't think I'll ever part with.
    And their recent 62MAS inspired pieces like the SPB143J really should be comparable to Tudors BB58. On paper they're very similar, both re-imagined classics, similar size, similar heritage, both all in house. The Tudor has a far superior mov't, but the Seiko has dia-shield coating and is half the price.
    The only reason the 2 aren't comparable is what appears to be Seiko's disregard for its customers.
    Comparable Swatch Grp brands like Mido, Certina and Longines would 𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟 allow watches to leave their facilities with the QC issues mid-range Seikos commonly hit the market with.
    And mov't wise? The 6R35 is rock solid once it's well regulated! I've never received a watch from a Swatch Grp brand with a badly misaligned bezel or a poorly regulated mov't, but each and every time one buys a Seiko of comparable price it's considered pure luck to receive it without QC issues!
    It's a joke and it's a shame. But Seiko don't seem that interested in the enthusiast market.
    Oh well... Fuck 'em.

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +2

      Great asessment Anthony! True the swisss brands evan though they aoutomated their processes they are careful on details. I guess that is the difference between japan and swiss.

  • @ph69jbl
    @ph69jbl 3 роки тому +2

    La asta stiu de ce ma uit din nou :)

    • @BraveBeaters
      @BraveBeaters  3 роки тому +1

      haha! trebuie facut unul cu toate 3

    • @ph69jbl
      @ph69jbl 3 роки тому

      @@BraveBeaters de ce nu toate 4? :) sau Tuna de 300 nu e worthy nefiind tuna?

  • @BlackWipeout
    @BlackWipeout 3 роки тому +1

    It’s not my style of watch...
    Great review ;)

  • @jeremiahlee6335
    @jeremiahlee6335 8 місяців тому

    Craftsmanship and Seiko don’t belong in the same sentence.

  • @ph69jbl
    @ph69jbl 3 роки тому +1

    Al doilea! ;)

  • @LARSENBISQUITS
    @LARSENBISQUITS Рік тому +2

    Poor video with a lot of misinformation. I would bet money that who ever opened up that watch to replace the battery in the past was sitting in his shed. All that crud on the dial and hands would not be there. You get what you pay for so don’t blame seiko for you not having enough money to buy a well taken care of example.

  • @bullsharkreef
    @bullsharkreef 2 роки тому

    Seiko's been making watches for 120 years, yet they still haven't learned how to align markers properly 🤣

    • @TomCorbett420
      @TomCorbett420 2 роки тому

      I have to 2 baby tunas and they are perfect. Stop lying lol

    • @bullsharkreef
      @bullsharkreef 2 роки тому

      @@TomCorbett420 I own 5 Seiko's, out of those, only 2 have their markers properly aligned, so I'd say that's a very poor average.

    • @TomCorbett420
      @TomCorbett420 2 роки тому

      @@bullsharkreef seiko 5 is the less expensive of all Seiko watches. I also own one that my mom brought from Dubai and it is correct for that price, i can do a video to show you if you want when i ll be at home.

  • @Dr_LK
    @Dr_LK 2 роки тому +1

    F*&k Seiko and their QC and inflated prices...

  • @trueseeker262
    @trueseeker262 4 місяці тому

    Come on reliability is more important l, BMW are badly built people still buy them.

  • @stephen255
    @stephen255 3 роки тому +1

    Love your videos. Do NOT like Seiko - at all. Just more junk from the far east. Ugly watches.

  • @roybatty6368
    @roybatty6368 Рік тому

    Trashy quality. I prefer ROLEX.