People that UNALIVED Someone in Self Defense, what’s your story?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 лис 2024
- Welcome to Rufus Read It. We work extremely hard to make the best quality content for you. Each video takes a ton of effort time and energy to complete. It's a true labour of love but you all make it worth it. All the content in these videos are owned by us!
Our Work Process:
1. Ideation + Scripting: We research and come up with the best ideas to turn into videos, we write the scripts and refine our commentary.
2. Voice Recording: All our videos are recorded by a real human. No Ai Voice recording.
3. Gameplay: Every minute of captivating gameplay you see on the channel 100% recorded by us.
4. Audio Editing: Each video is audio engineered. We edit the pacing, flow and add audio effects to elevate viewer the experience.
5. Editing: We bring everything together here. We generate captions, sound effects and color correct to make each video unique.
6. Quality Control: Each video is meticulously fine tuned so that it holds up to our highest quality standards. If the video is not up to par we go back to the drawing board and make sure it is.
Thanks for watching :)
Rufus
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
The surviving robber in story one is only sorry because his target turned out to be armed. They're so full of bravado until someone gets shot.
Story 1: he was only sorry because his life was over. They came with deadly intent and lost.
But serving life for a breaking an entering is a bit excessive no?.
@@dandraedrummond7390still unsure what their intentions were. If things went wrong they could have killed him, and it also depends on if they were armed or not. Breaking and entering is one thing, if they were armed with anything that could be lethal, it's not just breaking and entering anymore.
@@dandraedrummond7390 didn't they shoot the dog? That says they came with violent intent
You make my days at work easier; thank you.
im glad i could help and what you do for work
Did that last person really expect anyone to not immediately catch that he's talking about Batman
Story 5: Wait, Wait, Wait so was it the ex who she asked for help that was banging on her door and terrorizing her?
I'm sure the last story is Batman's origin story😂😂😂
Why the hell did the person in story 6 get charged? It was self defense
Horrible District Attorney just trying to get more cases under his or her belt. They probably used some BS excuse saying that him using a weapon against an unarmed assailant was not an appropriate response to the level of threat or saying something like he could have run instead and that he was not in any true immediate life-threatening situation (I'm not saying this, these are just things they use to get you). And most likely due to a lack of money, the defendant was not able to fight it to the end and instead had to take a lesser sentence.
Corrupt judicial system laws these days PROTECT CRIMINALS INSTEAD OF THE VICTIMS
@@projectmack9133or just à différent country than usa with différents law. For example, in France, if the attacker was bare handed, you have no right to défend yourself with a knife
Bay area is in California. California has duty to retreat doctrine when in public. It also has proportional defense as a form of self defense. So if the guy punched him, he can only really punch him back. So using a knife would be a disproportional rise in defense. California self defense laws are ass and the DAs love making the victims the people who suffer most times.
Hot take: while teaching kids to solve their problems peacefully and to try to deescalate things is important I think we should not make self defense a taboo.
Be it shoving back a pushing and pushing bully in school or whacking an armed robber or ending a would-be assaulter. Defending oneself or others from an unlawful attack with appropriate means should never be a crime and as soon as the attacker is armed or reasonably stronger its safe to assume they are out to seriously harm their victim. So the victim using segnificant force or some kind of implement to amplify their defensive capabilities is justified. Also minors or other people who can't defend themselves being attacked or at risk if a fight is prolonged are a factor.
While it should be ruled out that someone is using the claim of self defense as an excuse to justify beating someone up the defending party should also be considered innocent until proven guilty.
Also... When police or other officials use force to defend themselves or others or to stop what they reasonably assume to be an armed person... Dont blame them! Would you rather have cops that stand and watch as someone stabbs multiple people or cops that shoot a guy who keeps running at them knife in hand who turned out to be drunk out of his mind?
The latter might be a tragic death but them assuming the least dangerous possible scenario isn't an option.
As well as with civilians killing in self defense checks and control instances are essential but it shouldn't be the case that the press immediately jumps to conclusions or that people start yapping about police cruelty.
Not me, but my cousin John. His ex wife had gotten promoted by the Nakatomi Banking Corporation. She was transferred to Century City in Los Angeles, CA. John was on the NYCPD and there was a backlog of cases, he couldn’t just pack up and move so they divorced and she took the kids to the west coast. One Christmas in the late ‘80s, John was accidentally invited to the big holiday party at Nakatomi Plaza, right as a group of international freelance terrorists were planning to rob the place, and John took them all down, to protect himself and the guests at the party.
All of these pretty much prove when SECONDS count the police are MINUTES away!
Stopping children being first 🎉
I just turned twenty-two today, sir.
Happy Birthday!
@vinnie7301 Thank you very much, sir.
Happy birthday!!
@onionbubs386 Thank you very much, sir.
🥳
Story 1 - "I don't have PTSD, I just changed my behaviours and am extra alert after as a result of what happened"
Interesting and cool vid.
33:02 that’s literally Batman. 💀
Something is off with Story 6. How did the person defending themself get prison time. Something is missing or a lie.
Nothing missing. No lie. This happened in California. California laws concerning self-defense are...not condusive to having a victim defend themselves and not suffer the consequences of thinking their saftey is more important than the aggression spent on them by an attacker.
I sleep like a baby.
Am i being gaslit? Cuz sounds to me like if the last story is real he should definitely be in jail for double homicide…
The last story is the origin of Batman, as if told from the perspective of the man who shot Bruce Wayne's parents.