Comparing The BEST 4 Cylinder Ford Ecoboost Engine Blocks

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
  • It's crazy to see the side by side differences between the two engines. The 2.0L block is very stout.
    To Support Karz Kreated, It Helps TREMENDOUSLY to Like This Video & Of course by Subscribing to the Channel if you haven't already done so!
    Thank you For Being A Fan! 🤘😎
    🔹Support The Karz Kreated
    UA-cam Channel with Official Merch
    ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
    www.etsy.com/shop/KarzKreated
    🔹Visit the Karz Kreated Blog
    ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️ ⬇️
    karzkreated.blogspot.com/
    🟣 Follow me on 🟣
    Facebook / karzkreated
    Instagram / karz_kreated
    A Special Thanks To
    @Mishimoto Automotive
    #fordmustang
    #ecoboost
    #engine
    #teammishi
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @bradj7205
    @bradj7205 4 місяці тому +12

    The difference in the casting finish and web thickness is because of a complete difference in casting technology. The 2.0 block you have is a sand cast block, hence the rough surface finish and need for thicker webbing and wall thickness. The 2.3 block is a metal diecast block, a much more modern technique. With metal dies, the surface finish is considerably smoother than sand cast. With metal dies, they can pump the molten aluminum in under pressure, and achieve a denser casting, and can even control grain direction. The webbing and walls don't need to be as thick, because they are stronger for a giving thickness. However, the only way to do a metal die block is with open deck. It's hard to tell because you have the strap ontop of the 2.3, but it looks like the newer casting that Ford changed to address the coolant leakage between cylinders 2-3. The original design had a slit between the bores that caused head gasket blow outs and wall cracking, the updated blocks have no slit and have a coolant hole drilled between the bores.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  4 місяці тому +1

      Great point!

    • @omarmoran3097
      @omarmoran3097 3 місяці тому

      What year of mustangs would that be with the issues?

    • @omarmoran3097
      @omarmoran3097 3 місяці тому

      I want to know for future reference

    • @juanluistejadarosario7116
      @juanluistejadarosario7116 2 місяці тому

      Where can I get an Updated block ? Im looking for it, part number o place where I can get it, Thanks ! Greetings from DR .

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  2 місяці тому +1

      @juanluistejadarosario7116 Unfortunately, Ford recently discontinued production of the block. Some should be floating around somewhere, but getting anything new from now on will be near impossible.

  • @NewEdgeDesigns
    @NewEdgeDesigns 7 місяців тому +7

    Bigger holes or higher volume passages aren’t always better, certain passages may be smaller for higher velocity (flow faster)

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +2

      Fair point. I didn't think about that.

    • @tomw.4255
      @tomw.4255 2 місяці тому

      Do you know how this relates to the 1.6L, 2.0L, 2.5L / 4 cylinder ecoboost sizes?
      2016 Ford Escape, for instance.
      Is it just basically more horespower? I would think the bigger engine would be less strain on the ecoboost and be better overall for longevity and overall better performance.

  • @linchester8464
    @linchester8464 7 місяців тому +3

    it looks like the holes where the old oil filter passage are for you to self tap fittings for a remote oil cooler and oil filter setup.
    a lot of Nissan RB engines will plugged off the old oil filter location and run a remote oil cooler/filter combo with longer oil lines for more oil capacity and more volume = better cooling.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому

      That was one possibility I was thinking about, though the rep at MAPerformance didn't mention anything about it. They claim everything that bolts to a 2.3L block, bolts to this one except the engine mount brackets. An oil cooler would be great to put on, but that will have to be down the road a little. I'm gonna have to call them and verify.

  • @JaceWebb-wy3lh
    @JaceWebb-wy3lh 13 днів тому

    Several comments here that are incorrect. the 2.3rs block is infact a discast block as earlier mentioned, but the 2.0 block is CGI(compacted graphite iron) which is why its lighter even though its thicker. CGI actually gets weaker when cast over .50 inches (iirc) which is why all the critical areas are all .40 and .44 etc. CGI is what ford uses in the 6.7 powerstroke block as well. Several super high HP capable blocks are made of CGI.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  13 днів тому

      Great information. Thanks for sharing!

  • @alexk7286
    @alexk7286 7 місяців тому

    assembly on the way 👍

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +2

      Soon! A little drama with ordering the head gasket. That issue in itself is worthy of its own video because the company is being really scummy.

    • @pedrob559
      @pedrob559 7 місяців тому

      Aww how sad

  • @benscanlan3223
    @benscanlan3223 23 дні тому

    My 2018 block warped at 55k, I have a lot more confidence in the 2020 block replaced under warranty.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  23 дні тому

      Oh jeeze. 😯 yeah, hopefully the new block holds up for you.

  • @angelakarner2976
    @angelakarner2976 Місяць тому

    Any chance you have a part number for the block or which years it came out of? Which head are you using?

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  Місяць тому

      I don't know the part number of the block. It's either a Focus ST specific block, or just a standard 2.0 block that you would find in a Ford Fusion from 2015 on up. Evidently, there's a difference between the two where they were casted, and the ST blocks are said to be stronger. The head is just a standard 2.3 head for a 2020 Mustang.

  • @rabidduck1089
    @rabidduck1089 7 місяців тому

    @karzkreated Yeah man you're a real trail blazer. I have a '22 2.3 HPP myself and am wondering what is possible. I was always wondering if the RS block of the HPP is sleeved or not and the head difference was. Looks like the air intake is much more open than the regular 2.3 head though. Not trying to make more than 400 flywheel HP and tq myself, but this kind of stuff makes me consider just how much the 2.3 HPP is safely capable of.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +1

      The HPP can easily handle 400 HP, and anything beyond that is questionable. It's never how much it can take, but how long it can take it. The RS stuff is better in the sense that it's stronger, but at the end of the day it's still a 2.3 with 2.3 limitations.

    • @rabidduck1089
      @rabidduck1089 7 місяців тому

      @@KarzKreated As long as it can take it for 6 years with no track time and just some spirited highway driving that's good enough for me. Not so young anymore and just looking for some fun here and there and for FFS I like the auto but man it's hunting and hesitation drives me nutz.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +1

      @@rabidduck1089 it should be at that power level. It's not that much higher than stock. And I know what you mean with the 10R80! The factory trans tuning is horrendous! After I tune the engine in mine, I'm doing a trans tune.

    • @rabidduck1089
      @rabidduck1089 7 місяців тому

      @@KarzKreated I plan on going through PD Tuning myself. I already have an Accessport, but I'm not bothering to run those canned tunes on it.

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +2

      I don't think the cobb canned tunes are all that bad, but a custom tune is definitely the way to go. I'm sure a basic E30 tune wakes these cars up big time. But a decently hot 93 tune should definitely get you to your power goal.

  • @lska7853
    @lska7853 5 днів тому

    I am wondering 2024 2 litre water pump failure does the coolant go into oil pan?

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  5 днів тому

      As far as I know, the 2L still has the water pump housing in the same place. The coolant in the oil problem was from ecoboost engines that used a water pump inside the engine that was driven by the timing chain.

  • @ruston723
    @ruston723 3 місяці тому

    wonder if thats why the RS uses 50 weight oil

  • @jasswear8911
    @jasswear8911 6 місяців тому +1

    I would rather have the 2.3 block with a Deck plate

  • @TheLazydavid
    @TheLazydavid 7 місяців тому

    Are these engines the new ford MPC engine?

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +1

      Not at all. Both are previous generation engines.

  • @santinobambino1053
    @santinobambino1053 7 місяців тому

    I just finished my 2.0 stroked block Mustang check my videos
    for the oil filter adapter I have 10000 miles on my fresh block no problems original 2.3 adapter on the 2.0 block

    • @santinobambino1053
      @santinobambino1053 7 місяців тому

      Built my self

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому

      Oh cool! Does your block also have the same circle ports for the oil inlet and outlet?

    • @4pexPredator
      @4pexPredator 2 місяці тому

      Hi guys,i m preparing 2.0 block for my rs cylinder head and as i saw many builders fullfill this oil/water? channel that rs head hasnt.Did you also did it?I said my cnc shop to fullfill it with aluminum foil

  • @Optix-Code
    @Optix-Code 7 місяців тому +1

    Well, how long till you blow this one up?

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +2

      This one isn't going to blow up. Built far beyond what I'm going to run with every precaution taken to mitigate sealing problems.

    • @Lifeof728
      @Lifeof728 7 місяців тому +1

      Until he pours an entire gallon of lucas oil in the gas tank 😂

    • @Optix-Code
      @Optix-Code 7 місяців тому

      @@Lifeof728 🤪😂

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому +1

      Nah 😂 We ain't gonna do that again! #nochances

    • @Optix-Code
      @Optix-Code 7 місяців тому

      @@KarzKreated good man I want this build to be good and I wish the best as I watch it.

  • @gbass7328
    @gbass7328 3 місяці тому

    Do you have solid evidence that in 2020 a new, stronger rod is used compared to the older 2.3 blocks?

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  3 місяці тому +1

      Google Gen 2 Ecoboost connecting rod. Gen 2 rods are physically thicker and stronger than Gen 1. Gen 2 rods will bend rather than break, which is the preferred worst case scenario.

    • @gbass7328
      @gbass7328 3 місяці тому

      Thx. Yeah what Ive heard. They all need to be built for any more than 350 tq for real reliability. Out of the platform now for that very reason. Not my concern anymore.

    • @Davido50
      @Davido50 Місяць тому +1

      They are excellent. Owned both gen1 & gen2- 2.0L GTDI Ecoboost an both served me well. Good basic maintenance goes a long way. Both ran Better than my GFs Rav4. She now has a Bronco Sport.

    • @Davido50
      @Davido50 Місяць тому

      ​@KarzKreated Though even that is quite rare. Owned both gen1 & gen2 - 2.0L GTDI Ecoboost an they served me well for near 200k mis. Both sold running well! Good basic maintenance i.e full synthetic oil every 5k mis /Motorcraft filters etc is wise on any vehicles esp turbo DI.

    • @Davido50
      @Davido50 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@gbass7328 Why not your concern? These are excellent, stoutly designed engines in every regard.

  • @shaungill8034
    @shaungill8034 7 місяців тому

    i have the 2012 2.0 Ecobest motor the best one don't like 2016 one

    • @KarzKreated
      @KarzKreated  7 місяців тому

      I've heard the newer ones don't hold up as well. Something about Ford out sourcing the casting to another company. I've also heard that Mazda's version Is also stronger than the later Ford 2.0 EB.

  • @Beezwax4052
    @Beezwax4052 6 місяців тому

    this is why i am seeing ppl changing over to the 2.0

  • @user-rh5wi9vk2v
    @user-rh5wi9vk2v 3 місяці тому

    Casted😮😂 wtf??