Godot vs Unity: Can it be Used for Making Games?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2023
  • With all the testing that I did what I have found out is not everything is right or wrong.
    Support this Channel: / smartpenguins
    My PC Build: www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls...
    Discord: / discord
    Facebook: / smartpenguinsio
    Twitter: / smartpenguinsio
    Instagram: / smartpenguins
    Music by: www.bensound.com
    License code: 4JM2B6DTASIFP5N2
    Smart Penguins occasionally links to goods or services offered by vendors. Some of these may be affiliate links, meaning we earn a small commission if items are purchased. As Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @GlitchedCode
    @GlitchedCode 9 місяців тому +9

    I've heard a few times now from a few people about Godot crashing. The only time I ever had stability issues, was when I opt'd to use the alpha/beta incomplete versions so this has been interesting to hear from people 🤔

    • @SmartPenguins
      @SmartPenguins  9 місяців тому +1

      Yes, I had my game crash on me several times and I used the stable version, maybe because of stress testing it, but I hope it will not crash on the actual game.

    • @BanditLeader
      @BanditLeader 9 місяців тому

      Even in the 4.2 dev6 blog they said they fixed some crashes. So anyone who is crashing is their own fault for misusing the engine or writing bad code. Oh no I crashed my car into a wall, it's the cars fault not my bad driving

    • @rameynoodles152
      @rameynoodles152 8 місяців тому +1

      @@SmartPenguins I mean, I'm not trying to be mean, but when you say the "game" crashes... are you SURE it's just not something you did wrong in your code? Like, if I make a game from scratch in C++, I don't blame C++ when my game crashes, I look at my code and figure out where I screwed up. Now the editor, that's another thing. If the editor crashes, then obviously that's not your fault.

  • @Entikai
    @Entikai 9 місяців тому +4

    I wanted to use Godot 4 3D to make a game in my signature art style (see on my channel). But the problem I faced is that the "unlit shader" or "emissive" shader looks strange. The same 3D model looks fine in Godot 3, but looks off in Godot 4. There are some strange artifacts (like splotches) all over the 3D model. I can show a screenshot if someone wants to see. So I think I will wait for Godot 4 LTS before I dive in. Until then, I'll stick with Unity.

    • @SmartPenguins
      @SmartPenguins  9 місяців тому +1

      That is interesting, did you use StandardMaterial3D or ORMMaterial3D? or you tried both? I'll keep my eye on that.

  • @cryelectric
    @cryelectric 9 місяців тому +6

    Only when Unity becomes open source with an MIT license will I perhaps use it again.

    • @SmartPenguins
      @SmartPenguins  9 місяців тому +4

      Making something open source doesn't always mean that it will be better.

    • @cryelectric
      @cryelectric 9 місяців тому

      In the case of unity, yes.@@SmartPenguins

    • @Anthonyspartan514
      @Anthonyspartan514 9 місяців тому

      Blender comes to mind and open source allows for model design

    • @aladvs
      @aladvs 9 місяців тому

      @@SmartPenguins The pricing changes show that Unity is looking for new revenue methods, and while open source isn't always better, it allows the users to not have to worry about pricing changes.

    • @BanditLeader
      @BanditLeader 9 місяців тому

      ​@SmartPenguins it means if you have any issues, someone else has probably already made a fix. Unity is bloated with old and broken code on top of old and broken code. And if you find and report bugs, it takes months sometimes years sometimes NEVER for unity to fix them. Unity has project bricking bugs they haven't fixed in years. Open source doesn't have these problems, especially godot, because people fix them and old unused code is thrown out of the engine entirely.

  • @meosart1758
    @meosart1758 9 місяців тому

    Will it gonna be a 2d or 3d game?

  • @edward3190
    @edward3190 8 місяців тому

    godot can't export custom class/struct is a deal breaker for me.
    It is such a basic feature for an engine, and people have been asking for it for years, yet godot can't do it.

  • @lee1davis1
    @lee1davis1 8 місяців тому

    The fact godot does not support fbx files is a no deal for me. All my assets are fbx

    • @SmartPenguins
      @SmartPenguins  8 місяців тому +5

      Godot support fbx, that is what I used for the 3d fish import in my tests.

    • @jacksmith4266
      @jacksmith4266 8 місяців тому

      Lee1davis1 = Unity mole :D

  • @jesusmora9379
    @jesusmora9379 9 місяців тому +2

    People keep complaining about the lack of assets in godot like that's godot's fault.

    • @SmartPenguins
      @SmartPenguins  9 місяців тому +1

      No one is saying its godot's fault, that is just how it is.

    • @jesusmora9379
      @jesusmora9379 9 місяців тому +2

      @@SmartPenguins what i mean is, devs are supposed to provide the assets, make them themselves, hire someone or obtain them from the many online sources like thetextures or turbosquid.
      I never used the unity store, i made my own scripts and assets, precisely because i would own them and not have to deal with these kind of "problems". It always seemed very sketchy how tutorials and the even the docs would ask you to download some addon to get things like water or tileset tools.

    • @BanditLeader
      @BanditLeader 9 місяців тому +1

      Yeah anyone who complains about there not being a dedicated asset store is quite ignorant. You don't need a dedicated asset store. Godot supports all the industry standard formats, so any of the popular stores for assets work with godot. Your unity assets work in godot.

    • @jacksmith4266
      @jacksmith4266 8 місяців тому

      Using Unity Assets inside Godot might be against Unity's EULA.

    • @jesusmora9379
      @jesusmora9379 8 місяців тому

      @@jacksmith4266 are the assets yours or not? If you buy assets but its under the condition that they must be used in a specific software, then those are not your assets and you just wasted your money.
      Leave it to unity to put *microtransactions in the editor* .

  • @bsdrago
    @bsdrago 9 місяців тому +2

    Stick with unity until further notice =)

    • @nicefloweytheoverseer7632
      @nicefloweytheoverseer7632 9 місяців тому +2

      Bad idea, due to the per install fee.

    • @bsdrago
      @bsdrago 9 місяців тому +2

      @@nicefloweytheoverseer7632 Its not. I know math. Too much noise for nothing. When I knoledge more than my usual 15k or 20k copies (today) per game, I start to be worryed. If its more (by luck, hard work, some youtuber...), put the value in the price.
      The problem IS NEVER INSTALL FEE, but the lack of transparency. For now, its ok. Doesnt mean they dont screwup in the future. Right now, Im very ok.

    • @SmartPenguins
      @SmartPenguins  9 місяців тому +1

      You are right the fee is not a problem for me either, I'm fine with paying for a tool that makes me money as long as they continue to make it better.

    • @nicefloweytheoverseer7632
      @nicefloweytheoverseer7632 9 місяців тому +1

      @@SmartPenguins wait what?
      But Godot is free and open source!

    • @Anthonyspartan514
      @Anthonyspartan514 9 місяців тому

      @@nicefloweytheoverseer7632they are saying they are willing to pay unity for its tooks