Making The Identical Game On The Oldest VS Latest Versions Of Godot
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
- Making The Same Game On The Latest Version Of Godot And Oldest, What Could Go Wrong ? So Apparently Core Concepts Of Godot Engine Have Remained The Same, Like Scenes, Nodes, Resources And Stuff Like That BUT OH MAN! It Was Much Easier To Make The Same Game In Godot 4.2.2, also better graphics.
** Also since this is not really a tutorial, a lot of things have been done probably not in their best way, so if you choose to follow anything in this video just know it's not tested or the best way and might have bugs and performance issues. ***
Now I had to use 3 omni lights in godot 1.1, because I couldn't get shadows working properly with directional light. that's why it looks kinda darker than godot 4.2.2
In This Video We Will Make A Game In Godot 1.1 And Godot 4.2.2, Which is the latest version of godot at the time of recording this video.
original godot logo ( Godot 4.2.2 ) in the thumbnail by Andrea Calabro, license (CC BY 4.0 International): creativecommons.org/licenses/...
#godot #gameengine #game #indie
Sorry for the typos, the word complete should definitely not have been typed "Compeletely"...
Also since this is not really a tutorial, a lot of things have been done probably not in their best way, so if you choose to follow anything in this video just know it's not tested or the best way and might have bugs and performance issues.
Now I had to use 3 omni lights in godot 1.1, because I couldn't get shadows working properly with directional light. that's why it looks kinda darker than godot 4.2.2
Привет сможешь выложить исходный код игры на godot 4.2.2 которую ты сделал в этом видео?
Hi, can you upload the source code of the game on godot 4.2.2 that you made in this video?
Sorry it's just a test now, it needs a lot work before it could be called complete...
@@Code_It_All Ты все еще можешь это сделать?
Your channel is really interesting Mabel you should consider making tutorials on how to make games like this
bonus: make a game using the godot-precursor: Larvita3
first you would have to compile it 😂
what's larvita? I only find pokemon
larvita is one of the earliest versions of what eventually became godot
Next video: using Blender 1.0 with Godot 1.1
I was expecting it to be more like Blender where the original release was fundamentally different and borderline unusable.
tried using blender 2.78 and my respect for 3d modellers in the past has increased
@@Okarabouzouklis bruh 2.78 wasn’t that bad
@@potatofuryy nopd
I"m very surprised how similar to modern godot it is. I thought it would be completely different.
I wish you had shown a gameplay comparison.
Interesting! I didn't realize Godot's 3D capabilities were that sufficient back in 1.x.
From what I remember Godot was intended to be a mainly 3D engine, so it makes complete sense
@@MrKubaxius Yeah, it seems to have a reputation as a 2D engine, though. I jumped in using 3D at 3.0, so I thought maybe the earlier releases were more focused on 2D.
Your timing of saying to sub is very well placed i only lnow if i like the vid half way through
wait what how does this video not have more views? This was the most interesting video I've seen this month, great job!
Thank you!
"i see.."
8:42 you should be able to hit the "local to scene" checkbox for the material instead of needing to readd a material every time you call the scnee
You can project a label2d into 3d using camera3d with unproject_position() . Also you can hide it with is_position_in_frustum() when it's no longer in the frustum, may need raycasting to actually hide when it's occluded with another 3d object
Also the Label3D node is just a short hand for adding a label to a subviewport and displaying it with a sprite.
super good video, now i want to play this game, it looks like so much fun haha please make a mini release
Thanks! there's no levels and such so it'll get boring very soon
Okay thats bad, for me it seem like a lot of fun 😅
@@Code_It_All Release
Great video to see the evolution of Godot.
Have a wonderful day.
BTW : 1:55 remkae
2:22 10 Yeras ago
2:37 be compeletely honest
Haha, I was so tired editing this video that I forgot to check for typos, thanks for informing!
Great concept 😊😊😊
3:50 I always recommend using png images over jpg images anyway
You spent 4/5 of the video not talking about much :( makes it hard to watch.
Wish you the best though.
It's actually very interesting that most of the core ideas around the engine were exactly the same back then.
The likes were at 696 when I started watching XD
that font in the 1.1 IDE is insane
Make snake 🐍 in Godot 1.1
cs?
i tried compiling 1.0 but it fails as my msvc build tools are way too recent, does anyone here want to attempt this on linux using gcc?
Why not just set the build tools to v140 or whatever it requires?
@@Sergonizer Older versions are locked behind a Microsoft subscription. Either way I have already found a repo containing very old builds (even pre-1.0) but UA-cam seems to have auto deleted that comment
@@swarkin huh? Probably because I had community msvs 2015 installed before 2019 and 2022 I have them available, but does it really require a subscription now?
I don’t know if it’s pronounced the way you say it or go-dot
its pronounced guh-do by the people that made it
Tbh it doesn't really matter most people know what you mean anyway. You could say "goo-doot" and you might make sense lol
Godot 1 has better UI TBH. I love the lightning in Godot 1.1 too
That's just the default lighting, you can easily get Godot 4 to look like that by changing some settings
I used three omni lights for godot 1.1 since I couldn't get shadows work properly with directional light. So lighting might look different also I didn't add any World Environment node for 1.1
@@Code_It_All looks great
Underated Channel Great Vid
Godot's 1.1 GUI looks so much better man...
I disagree. Icons are inconsistent. Color looks bad. Including the code. Text instead of things that should just be icons. 3 looks the simplest and easiest. 4 looks the best
@@RenderingUser why are you bashing on him for an opinion, if you want to say you disagree just say that and stop there. its all opinions afterall.
@@box_speedruns bruh. Should I not elaborate on why I disagree? Nothing of value is contributed by just stating I disagree.
Second, he didn't say specifically whether it's his opinion or a claim to objectivity. So you're basically working off a assumption.
And lastly, I simply shared my own option and elaborated on that. That's a far cry from bashing
@@box_speedrunshe wasn’t bashing anyone though?
@@RenderingUser read your comment back, from how i percieved it the way you were "disagreeing" looked to be very objectively oriented since you were litteraly just saying "that looks bad, that also looks bad, that aswell looks very bad." the entire time.
second of all humans work on assumptions and if we didnt assume conversations would be 100% questions since if we dont want to assume we would need to ask the other person if they said every single word right and then ask again since what if they were talking to someone else? if you dont ask again you would be assuming and over and over. working off of assumptions is neccessary so bringing that up as a point doesnt really work, stuff you dont think your assuming are assumptions. you assume your mother is your mother and your dad is your dad. if they look exactly like them and in the context you very much think its them, you dont ask them. you dont ask your parents every single time you meet them if they are your parents or just a random person that looks 1:1 to them, and same with basically everything. you assumed his comment wasnt a joke aswell.
and then of course last of all, bash (bashing) from the dictionary google uses (oh shocker assumptions its right???) says that bash means to critisize severely, which if you read it back once again really sounds like what you were trying to objectively do bringing up so many points.
then again, im now accidently bashing you, but thats not the point here.
finally, for the last time, your first message to the other guy doesnt give value anyways (referring to): "nothing of value is contributed by just saying i disagree" what was the noticeable value in saying that you think the gui is worse than the latest one. even if hes going to make his own ui for anything, 1 person is not even anywhere CLOSE to enough to determine if its a good all around change according to even a minority.
Hmm
Typo 2:23
1:56 too (I think it’s intentional but eh)
Really 2:22 but yeah
Uyt
Uy4
Am I the only one who thinks that the new Godot appearance looks weird and not serious or childish as opposed to the old version?
You have complete control over the appearance
@@aden2427 can I make it look like in this video? 😅
@@TheSunriseGames I bet you can get it pretty close. Just go into the editor settings and play around with it. But also you can google around for editor themes that are already made.
Latest: 4.FIREINTHEHOLE
ok
not funny
Seriously, "fire in the hole" is everywhere in geometry dash 2.2
@@notChocoMilk i have allergic reaction on milk
Not funny