Star Citizen: Should you buy the Tumbril Storm?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 чер 2023
  • New concept tank, likely to be in game soon, but what do we know? Is it worth picking up this concept? Learn about it here and if it's worth your money!
    New to the game and want to start with 5000 extra credits? Help me and you out by using the code below to join up:
    tinyurl.com/yx3ezjdq
    Support the channel and get some great perks in two ways:
    Patreon - www.patreon.com/user?u=241758...
    UA-cam - / @stlyoungblood
    Tobii Eye Tracker Discount Available: tobii.gg/STLYoungblood
    Want to join a friendly community with over 1,500 of my friends? Check out the Planet Express Crew. We plan to have weekly operations and training events: planetexpresscrew.com
    Twitter:
    / stlyoungblood
    Twitch:
    / stlyoungblood
    Intro:
    Template (Hyper Indent) purchased and licensed via videohive
    Cinematic Intro 8, Slow woosh flying through, & Whooshes 3 - pack of 12 from Audiomicro.com
    Licensed, Used with Permission, Royalty Free
    *Full Disclosure: I am a Star Citizen Fan BUT am not paid or contracted by CIG in anyway other than I am an Evocati Member and as such am under a NDA during closed tests.
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 74

  • @STLYoungblood
    @STLYoungblood  Рік тому +2

    If you're looking for a referral code, get one from here (my randomizer): tinyurl.com/yx3ezjdq
    Speaking of that, my supporters earn my referrals, so if you want to support the channel and hopefully get free stuff, consider signing up at one of these: www.patreon.com/STLYoungblood
    ua-cam.com/channels/x8fzdrJcPQLY7luxo-2Mkg.htmljoin

  • @qoohenqoo1153
    @qoohenqoo1153 Рік тому +21

    you should do a state of the game update for those of us who haven't been following for the last two years

    • @000NULL
      @000NULL Рік тому +1

      There’s more things to do, there are connectivity issues and performance is hit or miss.

    • @brianrogers6225
      @brianrogers6225 Рік тому +1

      This would be awesome! Especially since 3.19.1 is looking to be very stable and will likely bring a big resurgence or at least a good chunk of new/returning players

  • @Sparkp1ug
    @Sparkp1ug Рік тому +6

    A tank that opens in the FRONT with no ground clearance and a mechanically operating seat so I can get shot while sitting through an exit/entrance animation?!? That's gonna be a 'no' from me, dawg. 🤣

  • @Spike.SpiegeI
    @Spike.SpiegeI Рік тому +8

    biggest bonus of this vs nova is you can solo this, I don't typically have another person available to use the nova. I think it'll be great to roll up to bunkers when you can't land your ship close by.

    • @Draxel
      @Draxel Рік тому +4

      The Nova driver has access to the main gun via a Remote Turret option, so it's very much soloable.
      Not sure if it was like that at release, but it is now 👍

    • @Arbiteroflife
      @Arbiteroflife Рік тому

      @@Draxel I think it was always like that.

    • @Stormyy6310
      @Stormyy6310 Рік тому +1

      You're never rolling up to bunkers with that as it is massive, you'll need a C2 or something like that to transport it, also why would you wanna take an unpractical tank to bunkers as the turrets don't shoot you, better take a cyclone imo, cheaper and can be transported by anyone, as for the solo value, I don't know who would attempt to solo things like JT using a ground assault

  • @friendlyspacedragon7250
    @friendlyspacedragon7250 Рік тому +3

    A correction: The Storm has one size 3 gun. It's just dual-barreled like the attrition series of guns.
    The pilot seat is front-accessible probably because so CIG could use ship entering animations that already exist. And yes, the width is a big deal. If you can't fit the Storm in anything that couldn't fit a Nova you might as well take the Nova.

  • @DawnstealerGaming
    @DawnstealerGaming Рік тому +7

    Yeah, if this thing can't fit in a Valk, something went wrong in the design

  • @generalrendar7290
    @generalrendar7290 8 місяців тому

    There are so many IFVs, light tanks, infantry fire support, and light scout vehicles to draw inspiration from and CIG released this thing. It isn't more transportable than Nova, doesn't have rocket munitions, and has a bifold door between the pilot and very highpowered weaponry. They should have brought in an outside consultant for this vehicle.

  • @ozramblue117
    @ozramblue117 Рік тому +1

    Hard missed opportunity for an actual Light tank the size of an Ursa. I’d have given it a bespoke railgun.

  • @Sanjarih
    @Sanjarih Рік тому

    I was tempted to get it as it looks a lot like the Tumbler from the Nolan Batman movies,

  • @dugggins
    @dugggins Рік тому

    Being ground vehicles, they aren't constrained by weight, so they should balance the downside of being vulnerable with much bigger components. Give it size 3 components. Then it would make sense why the driver has a tiny cockpit vs the rest of the size of the thing.

  • @kaollachan
    @kaollachan Рік тому

    i wish we could have a strom version that would be like the lightning of planetside 2 equiped with the DCA flak canon , that was pretty fun to use back then

  • @herbaceousboredom9584
    @herbaceousboredom9584 Рік тому +1

    The Lyran Commonwealth knows that the Nova is a perfectly acceptable scout tonk; the Storm and Cyclone are therefore unnecessary :D

    • @likeorasgod
      @likeorasgod Рік тому

      ALL Nova is a Stiener Scout Lance.

  • @fmartingorb
    @fmartingorb Рік тому +3

    The Tonk fits width wise in the Valkyrie and Carrack comfortably. The Storm with the gun tucked in should fit in no problem

    • @fmartingorb
      @fmartingorb Рік тому

      @@realRorschach the tonk has room to spare. It is a tight fit. Like I said, the only reason the tonk does not fit is its height

  • @foiblegilneas1777
    @foiblegilneas1777 Рік тому

    Since it is likely that this vehicle would see more combat that most land vehicles, is it worth getting it with the extended insurance?

  • @andreprado5953
    @andreprado5953 Рік тому

    It may have it´s chance to be a chess piece of an army , or to be used inside those future gigantic bunkers(as CIG stated) which could be explored with vehicles. Best way for use it would be : buy it´s LTI(securing it´s $70 price) , melt it, close your gap CCus(and buy a cheap $5 CCu to it too), and if you really like it, buyback it´s LTI. If you dont like it, you´d have a somewhat but not so much expensive LTI Token

  • @Teizan0
    @Teizan0 Рік тому

    Disregarding the point of the video (should you buy);
    The Storm, compared to the Nova, is Fast. That's a given. Might even be Cyclone Fast or something.
    The Storm is _also_ a completely solo ground vehicle. That's a strong plus.
    Finally, you should _not_ be using the Storm alone. Given the common Hercules' capacity for 2 tanks, it is a Storm + Nova or at least Storm + Storm duo that you scale up.
    (In the current environment, also add both types of Anvil AA vehicles as a matter of course because of course this has to be a group effort).

  • @Jamie-666
    @Jamie-666 Рік тому

    I want to sit half out on top on the Tonk like Rommel.

  • @FiveCrazyGamer
    @FiveCrazyGamer 11 місяців тому

    Pls a new Video about the Polaris i bought it recently and want to know ure opinnion about the ship

  • @d3m3n70r
    @d3m3n70r Рік тому +1

    As long as CIG doesn't confirm this thing will fit in a Valk, I am definitely not into this.
    From the measures we currently have, it won't go past the hydraulics.

  • @SwedishYouthHumanist
    @SwedishYouthHumanist Рік тому

    It doesn't have 2xS3 laser weapons, only one S3 remote turret. It can therefore either have 2xS2 or 1xS3.
    Though I don't think you should be able to lock ground targets, they should have only a few hundred meters detection range and they should have tons more armor than ships, for balance.

  • @elfwyn8707
    @elfwyn8707 Рік тому

    I expect that Star Citizen Gameplay and Economy will facilitate a balance of power more akin to the real world than for example World of Warcraft. While Warcraft has a linear progression with rising levels and wealth with absolutely no way to revert the progress that will definitely be the case in Star Citizen. Meaning that "Setbacks" are a thing. Insurance is not meant as a savepoint where you can never loose a thing. As in the real world most Insurance will come with a heavy running cost, especially if it is unreasonable. (Like life insurance for a terminally ill patient or insuring the paint job on a crash car)
    So I do not share the idea that "we will all be rich someday". I think it is more likely that based on skill and effort most people will have "their ship" they will take out to "work" and upgrade it from time to time. At some point a ship will need replacement or a total overhaul to keep it spaceworthy, so some money needs to be saved up for that.
    Those with superior skill in their trade will be able to expand on a different level, hiring other players or NPCs to proceed on a higher level, but theres is always the possiblility of a catastrophic loss that will set operations back for month or even years making it necessary to scale back oeprations again.

  • @marcmiddleton2277
    @marcmiddleton2277 11 місяців тому

    This should have a couple missiles to deal with 2 or 3 armor and escape.

  • @firstjayjay
    @firstjayjay Рік тому

    i wish CIG would release a ship every day, than we would get a STL vid every day :D

  • @Anachroschism
    @Anachroschism Рік тому

    I like the idea of a small, compact, solo tank, but I've not seen a need to buy ground vehicles or light fighters, as they're very cheap in-game.

  • @vonrosphe3098
    @vonrosphe3098 Рік тому

    I think the storm looks very cool. But it's very useless. For a scout it should be much smaller or need a interior and special scanning abilities.
    With it's size it should have an interior and NEVER a exit to the front. Why not a traditional entrance from above if CIG don't want an interior for it.
    And it's way to big for such a little main gun.
    I think CIG should equip it with a large gun (maybe S7) and call it a tank destroyer. Like a Ares but as a ground vehicle.

  • @bitrunner2000
    @bitrunner2000 Рік тому

    bought one - i might tool around in it for a while, but really bought it as a token...

  • @johna1186
    @johna1186 Рік тому

    I have only one question. Does it come in black?

  • @kobrapromotions
    @kobrapromotions Рік тому

    im like 1800 in and i dont need anymore ships/vehichles or spending just SQ42 and a more persistent game, I was an evocati wave 1

  • @bevanjonsson2284
    @bevanjonsson2284 9 місяців тому

    Wow its really been a long time since anything's been released

  • @ethnine2692
    @ethnine2692 Рік тому

    I was tempted. But I think I will pass and just buy it in-game. And maybe it will release with more ground assault combat gameplay content when it does eventually come out.

  • @Quickb3n
    @Quickb3n Рік тому

    Ground vehicle $/aUEC ratios make them terrible uses of store credit imo. Maybe for the first patch if you're desperate to try it out whilst it's not in the ingame stores, but as soon as it hits New Deal it's an instant melt.

  • @Paradox3713
    @Paradox3713 Рік тому

    Bruh, we already know how you feel about ground vehicles. If it don't fly in space and planetside, it ain't worth real money. LOL!
    Hell, the only reason the Nova is worth a damn is because you can put 3 of them on top of an 890 Jump and turn it into a battleship. 😆

  • @charlesballiet7074
    @charlesballiet7074 Рік тому

    could have been a ciil apc o well

  • @defiante1
    @defiante1 Рік тому

    Seems odd to discuss it when its not usable yet, its all just theory about how well it works.

    • @vonrosphe3098
      @vonrosphe3098 Рік тому

      If you have to decide to buy it now with real money or later ingame a theory discussion is all you can get.
      When you wait until it's drive ready you NEVER will geht the actual $/€ price.

  • @MaceTheNegotiator
    @MaceTheNegotiator Рік тому

    When will there be a discord server!
    This community is both practical and forward-thinking and I think you ought to put together a community of like-minded individuals

  • @LotusBoi1989
    @LotusBoi1989 4 місяці тому

    any reason your intro was so heavy in the right channel, and almost none in the left?

  • @Trilobiteer
    @Trilobiteer Рік тому +4

    Ah yes, a heavy recon vehicle. Truely the game could not have been launched without this.

    • @likeorasgod
      @likeorasgod Рік тому

      PU will be ground and space, now if this was holding up SQ42 this late in the game than I would have problem. PU is going to be forever growing and adding new ships and ground stuff.

    • @andrewcoulthard-clark
      @andrewcoulthard-clark Рік тому

      ...ha ha, this is my favourite comment😅

  • @Oldmaninscene24
    @Oldmaninscene24 Рік тому

    Is it just me or does that autocannon seen awfully unprotected? It feels like you could just blow off the weapon with a well placed infantry launched missile.

  • @Volf1916
    @Volf1916 Рік тому

    this is easy to answer. hell and no. one it is just a concept and not a thing even digitally in game. two you will be able to get in game for about two hours of game time. How much is your real money worth?

  • @romanrm1
    @romanrm1 Рік тому +1

    Your intro is again in the left channel only.

  • @shrk128
    @shrk128 Рік тому

    War thunder player here.
    TBH, this thing is a steaming pile of shit.
    The comparison I can make here is probably to the German PUMA IFV - a beefy, armored and reasonably nimble vehicle that comes with a relatively strong 30mm autocannon.
    The PUMA is built pretty much for the same reasons the Storm is - recon, survivability, bridging the gap between transport and heavy armor.
    The difference is that besides the gun and the armor, the PUMA also comes with 2 ATGMs that can destroy tanks, and room for six dismounts plus the original three crewmembers.
    The PUMA is also 50% smaller than this massive hunk of polymer.
    For starters, the track modules are absolutely massive - it looks like someone saw a T28 Super Heavy Tank - which was an American WW2-era tank destroyer with a 105mm cannon and weighed 100 tons - so much so it needed two sets of tracks to move.
    A recon APC/IFV DOES NOT NEED THAT MUCH GROUND PRESSURE.
    secondly, the main compartment is massive enough to fit at least a cargo bay, if not a troop compartment - this would also be a wonderful time to place the cabin in such a way that the driver can dismount from the rear of the vehicle.
    Lastly, in a theoretical ground-only engagement, this thing would eat shit - being so large and so poorly armed, it's a kill pinata.
    The bare minimum CIG could do is add to missile slots for AAM/ATGM purposes - the Nova has 'em and it's like half the size of this shit.
    And to conclude this, I would reccomend you look up the Wiesel AWC - a German air-transportable tank (for a very general definition of the word) that features the same capabilities of the Storm, sans the armor perhaps - and you could fit 8 of them in the space taken up by one Storm.
    I have a lot of shade to throw at the Nova, but at least it's generaly tank-like, for fucks sake.

  • @bodboddington9367
    @bodboddington9367 Рік тому

    Yeah, it is sad the "mini tank" is as wise as the "heavy tank"

  • @TheSpaceKiwi
    @TheSpaceKiwi Рік тому

    It's a shame coz the Storm looks cool as hell.

  • @SCTimbal
    @SCTimbal Рік тому

    Should you buy a Storm? Nope. But dang I was tempted. LOL.

  • @PH03NIX96
    @PH03NIX96 Рік тому +1

    Don't bother. It'll be in game for like 15K UEC at a later date.

  • @mskolnik2
    @mskolnik2 Рік тому

    It really is just a 1x size 3. Which makes it seem drastically underpowered and way too large for what it is.

  • @Frank-os6gq
    @Frank-os6gq Рік тому +1

    The point to buying it is to support the game, and beyond that to build your ground fleet for when gameplay supports that or org pvp battles. As a scout tank its role is very clear. Its not a nova tank.

  • @fmartingorb
    @fmartingorb Рік тому

    I am going to go back and review your you should not buy in the past and see if your predictions become true in the game

  • @Fetor
    @Fetor Рік тому

    ....... n o

  • @MikePhilbin1966
    @MikePhilbin1966 Рік тому

    Wow, destroyed.

  • @andrewcoulthard-clark
    @andrewcoulthard-clark Рік тому

    Am I wrong, you sound 'underwhelmed'...?

  • @hurtfixer_
    @hurtfixer_ Рік тому

    TO LATE` (I Bought one for my A2)

  • @montanelas6716
    @montanelas6716 Рік тому +3

    Wish the stopped making usless vehicles and focus a bit more on the core game , we already have enough for now

    • @likeorasgod
      @likeorasgod Рік тому

      3D artist tend to not have a clue about coding so it's a little hard to say, "Well while we work on this other thign, you guys just sit there and do nothing."

    • @montanelas6716
      @montanelas6716 Рік тому

      @@likeorasgod well still they are directing resources to implement vehicles that add nothing to the game right now

  • @cypressstar633
    @cypressstar633 Рік тому

    Oh No! You came out with this to late!....I already bought it.... 🤷

  • @joelellis7035
    @joelellis7035 Рік тому

    nah.

  • @umdieecke6266
    @umdieecke6266 Рік тому

    Nope 🔜

  • @Agyris
    @Agyris Рік тому

    Value fo money?
    Buy the game to play it. That is value.
    Buy more only if you can and want to support the game cause you won’t get any value for things that are free ingame.
    (Money value)
    The only thing you win by bying more is time spent to get it ingame. So money for time.

  • @jaracrassen7902
    @jaracrassen7902 Рік тому

    Nah. I imagine it'll be cheap in-game.

  • @shadow7037932
    @shadow7037932 Рік тому

    No, no one should buy ground vehicles for real money. They are over priced.

    • @vonrosphe3098
      @vonrosphe3098 Рік тому

      Why not. The mule was a nice LTI token.....

  • @PingWhisper
    @PingWhisper Рік тому

    No you shouldn't buy things that don't exist.