Charles Leerhsen - Ty Cobb - History Author Show

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @waltdude
    @waltdude 2 роки тому +8

    Thank you so much for setting the record straight. Ken Burns owes the Cobb Family an apology for maligning his legacy. Now I
    question every film he has made.

    • @historyauthorshow
      @historyauthorshow  Рік тому +4

      Thank you, Walt .I couldn't agree more, and always call out Mr. Burns's version of events when I get the chance. His erasing of the Freedmen from his Civil War productions is particularly grating.

  • @jecasey2
    @jecasey2 Рік тому +2

    This was such a great interview, I wish it were longer. Two classy guys having an informative conversation. The discussion was in a most respectful balance with the interviewer and the author asking and answering questions in a way that presented the subject matter clearly and credibly. I felt better for hearing it.

    • @historyauthorshow
      @historyauthorshow  Рік тому

      John, thank you so much for taking the time to listen and for your kind comment. It's heartening to know that in a world where snark and glib takes seem to rule the day, people still appreciate solid history researched with precision like Mr. Leerhsens -- and that I did my job in helping bring it to life. We both tweeted out your comment. You might also enjoy our interview about his book on Butch Cassidy. That's a video so lots of pictures and video. All the best, sir.

  • @SteveGee1986
    @SteveGee1986 3 роки тому +11

    Leerhsen is the 23&Me for sports writing. Convenient narratives are tough to correct. The book is excellent. When research is emphasized, many false narratives are dispelled.

  • @timorthelame1
    @timorthelame1 3 роки тому +7

    Leerhsen did a great job of researching and writing about Cobb.

  • @patrickstewart6090
    @patrickstewart6090 9 місяців тому

    Great interview as a baseball historian I’ve read so many articles that are the truth and the truth never get out until now

  • @bt2476
    @bt2476 Рік тому

    But make no doubt about it, Ty Cobb was never known as a less than intellectually sharp fellow! Even Al Stump I think at least gave him that.

  • @bt2476
    @bt2476 Рік тому

    What's interesting is, if listen to some of the old player interviews who were teammates with Cobb, or played alongside him, get different stories. Like Sam Crawford who was a teammate for many years, Crawford always said that "Cobb never had a friend in baseball" and really didn't have anything positive at all to say about him.
    Then people like Smokey Joe Wood, said that Cobb was one of his "Very best friends in baseball", and he played against him! Still a somewhat mysterious figure. Would like to hear a thorough account of Shoeless Joe Jackson one day too. What type of person was he?

    • @victordolan2624
      @victordolan2624 2 місяці тому

      Original Sources? Or telephone game """quotes"""?

    • @bt2476
      @bt2476 2 місяці тому

      @@victordolan2624 these were the very words of Crawford and Wood, from recorded interviews/audio clips. Look it up on UA-cam, you can hear the words come from their very mouths. Interesting stuff

  • @phillipgarrow2297
    @phillipgarrow2297 Рік тому +1

    It seems lies sometimes become legend

  • @kumarg3598
    @kumarg3598 10 місяців тому

    Wuhl did an interview on opie and anthony. Wuhl didnt like the evidence presented by this book.

    • @historyauthorshow
      @historyauthorshow  10 місяців тому

      Thanks for commenting. A lot of people don't like the evidence, as we discussed in the conversation, 'cause people clung to these myths -- often passed down at games, treasured childhood memories -- but it's who he was.

    • @kumarg3598
      @kumarg3598 10 місяців тому

      @historyauthorshow I always thought robert wuhl was smart so it was disappointing. The movie Cobb was great; who really cares if we now know the story isn't true. No one conflates Eminems life with B rabbit. He was defending the integrity of the movie when it was not necessary.

    • @historyauthorshow
      @historyauthorshow  10 місяців тому

      @@kumarg3598 Very true. It's not like they presented it as history, and it's understandable they based it on the Stump bio.