“I think a curse should rest on me - because I love this war. I know it’s smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment - and yet - I can’t help it - I enjoy every second of it.”- Winston Churchill letter to a friend Re 1914-19 For this alone he should be condemned
He enjoyed bIood, not his own of course. But he was eager to sacrifice everyone and everything for his personal ambition. Probably the worst monster of 20th century.
Churchill was a privileged member of the ruling class. He was no friend of the ordinary working man and his life and actions need seeing in context. As a working class Brit, I dislike him immensely.
Winston Churchill was one of the worst monsters of 20th century. Just incredible how many crimes he committed from Africa to India, from Ireland to Palestine, from WW1 to WW2 and between. Endless manipulation, machinations, betrayal of his own allies and in the end the betrayal of the Empire.
Listening to Tariq Ali is a breath of fresh and vital air. I attended a talk by Mr. Ali in Toronto years ago; he is as vital to our education now as then. Thank you for this great interview.
I was educated in England during the 1960's. My history teacher was a gem - he showed us that Churchill was an entitled drunk who loved to tell stories, especially about himself! British empire? ended not soon enough for the native citizens. I am an English woman living in Ireland - and I am blessed to be welcomed here.
Your teacher was like many such 1960's and since was clearly an indoctrinated marxist, the very people who over recent years have wrecked Europe and brainwashed kids with their far left ideology. The same ideology which wrecked and took over Ireland since the '60's, and which they are protesting about right now as they see the native Irish being replaced, and treated as 2nd class citizens. We've all seen how 'entitled' champagne socialists are.
@@FiveLiver The man has been dead since 1965, and the world has gone through at lot of changes, with or without him! Except the state of the UK it finds itself in presently? He must be rolling in his grave the sod.
Time alters many things. Tariq is a national and international treasure these days. He wasn't always thought of in such terms in his youth, but he stuck to reason in his arguments and has been proven to be correct. His comment on Braverman was spot on.
@mcjeebus with all due respect that's an easy and lazy response.. I don't accept that the war was won by one person and both my grandfather's earned the right to be critical when they put thier lives on the line.. several times
As my dad was an 🇺🇸 officer in 101st Airborne who was sent to England a year before the invasion to build those camps he hated the class system of Britain and are with the working class along with pleasure time as his ancestors found in Kent having followed William from Normandy with my maternal ancestors from German Jews and Scots Irish to American colonies before War of Independence hate any class system.
@@DaveyNaples its a repsonse, based on Churchills Lies. Mcjeebus simply is the naiv type whod be like "at least we arent speaking german" even tho, England was never at Danger from Germany at all.
This history is only untold in England and Hollywood, everyone else knows what Churchill was....😔
6 місяців тому+7
Sadly, not everyone. Less that a fraction of the world's population knew and most of the dominant population simply do not care because they do not consider others as human.
I kind of knew the European empires, and now the US Empire, had done bad things. October 7th was the catalyst that plunged me into the mind shattering cold waters of a rabbit hole. A rabbit hole I still haven't crawled out of. The extent of the suffering caused by the European Continent makes you want to sit down and take a beat. I can't believe I didn't know ANY of this. I feel like I've been sleepwalking for the past 30 years... And in the words of Norman Finkelstein: "I am not Pro-Palestine and I am not anti-israel. I am PRO-Truth, and I am PRO-Justice!" Thank you for this interview. We all need to be more exposed to this kind of content 🙏.
Every empire has and is doing bad things. European empires are no better or worse than those of the past and the ones those that are emerging today. The only thing that separates the recently disappeared European empires and the China of today, is that many Europeans feel bad about what their empires did. Right now most Chinese are proud of what their empire is doing, just as those Europeans were 150 years ago.
Because you've only been brainwashed to hate Europeans that gives you a distorted perspective on history. You speak of the "extent of suffering caused by the European continent" but are not even aware of the Arab Muslim slave trade in Africa and Europe. Nor are you aware of the slave trade that Africans implemented themselves for centuries before the Europeans ever set foot there. What of the tens of millions murdered by Genghis Khan and the Mongols? The millions of captives sacrificed and enslaved by the Aztecs? The millions butchered by the Mughal Turks who took over India? Etc, etc, etc. If anything the west has enlightened the world, giving it the very concept of human rights and liberal progress that you use to condemn it.
I stumbled on the truth over twenty years ago. So glad you finally discovered the truth. If the attack on the 7th. did anything, it prompted people like you to take a look under the hood and see who the real villains are in the piece. Please keep reading and learning. There are many atrocities in history which most people are unaware of. The Armenian Holocaust, the Irish potato famine, the Rape of Nanking, The death camps in Cambodia, Tol Sleng being the worst, Unit 731 in Japanese controlled China where the most Arrtociouse medical experiments were performed on innocent Chinese prisoners, Mau's five year plan, Stalin's agricultural colectivization plans in the Ukraine. The British Empire had the Atlantic slave trade, the selling of Opium to Chinese citizens, leading to the Opium wars between those two nations. British Empire rape of india. And msny more southern hemisphere countries. And today we have the Genocidal revenge mission by Israel in Gaza.
@@VaucluseVanguardPlease explain just what is China doing to anyone which compares it to the British Empire ! Which nations has China invaded and extracted their mineral wealth from lately !
@@VaucluseVanguard Europe pretends to be all about human rights, dignity, and so-called freedom (when it suits them). China at least doesn't seem as keen to blow smoke up people's arses by pretending to be other than what they are.
Divide and rule is the way the British ruled in all colonial countries they ruled. The division of Cyprus is another example. The British still have sovereign bases in Cyprus. It is one of the colonial countries that the British still have a foothold today.
@@newadam573 Yes, dear, such nonsense. All we are talking about is the colonial victims of British rule: India, the Middle East, just two blatant examples. I know, you're a Sassenach and believe in the Monarchy and that the sun should never set on the British Empire...
Any historian will tell you Winston churchills memoirs are not historical fact. Winston Churchill didnt write the history, he wrote his version of history. Historians wrote the history based on research of credible sources, of which there are many of the 20th century.
Winston Churchill didnt write history he wrote his memoirs, which any historian will tell you are heavily biased and not historical fact. Historians wrote the history based on credible sources, of which there are many in that period.
History white washed by elites in the past and still now, who will put their ilk in a good light usually to preserve their power and money interests are hardly trustworthy. Someone though, who has reasearched the outcomes of the ones who have been effected by their greed and lust for power are the voice's I would trust especially when you make note that there are enough documented histories of them subjugating others.
@user-ed6ff3bb4i It is traumatising for you to challenge the image of Churchill as a virtuous, benevolent and wise ruler that has been cultivated in your mind since childhood? Because you're proud to be British, right? Churchill doesn't stand for Britain any more than Stalin stands for Russia. There are things to be proud of mate. But don't be proud of the imperialism, genocide and exploitation. Only c/nts are proud of that stuff
Your interview with Tariq Ali was a gem. As an American I was fascinated by his opinions on the U.S. hegemony and I totally agree, after listening to that raving sociopath Victoria Nuland on a U.S. Sunday chat show advocating targeting sites inside Russia with U.S. weapons, I agree with Tariq Ali that my country would go so far as to destroy the world to maintain hegemony over it.
I don’t think that it’s the real Americans that is if you can find any who are not Zionists. The fact that the Israelis think that because some heads of state who had no authority from the Palestinians decided to ease their conscience by shifting the problem to the Middle East and in particular to Palestine is unconscionable to say the least. To forcibly move those people who were simple people who had no idea what was happening to them and to justify it by silencing the world for75 years. What other nationality had that privilege. In the meantime the rothschilds Rockefeller’s etc became richer and more powerful to the point where they can silence everyone except the students. They’re not afraid of wealth or power. They not afraid to voice their discontent and to protest against these gross inequality and atrocities on basically defenceless people. It is outrages that the so called civilised western civilisation can breach to other countries on morals and ethics. Especially regarding women. When woman in the west are raped on a daily basis physically assaulted murdered used as sexual objects and preach to the Muslims where if anything like that happened their is no second chance for any of the perpetrators. But hypocrisy is the name of the game lies and distortion of the truth. What came out on the 7 October immediately after the uprising by Hamas. The narrative was the atrocities these people were supposed to have committed against Israelis. 40 babies killed and beheaded. Did anyone ask where these freedom fighters could find 40 babies to kill was any video released to show this were any parents crying over their dead babies. No. Complete lies. Than we had the rape accusations and I ask you when your fighting for your life are you going to have time to rape anyone. This has also been proven to be a lie. But the Zionists networks and in particular piers Morgan repeats that narrative over and over again. And what about reparations for those people whose homes were forcibly taken and their land. No reparations unlike Germany and other nations who removed the Jews from their homes and still pay their families. Anyway the west is obviously lost its way and hopefully Americans will not vote for either trump or Biden instead vote for people who are not the puppets of the Zionists and maybe America can be fair and just.
@@aodhfinn, there are a lot of people in my country, the United States, who are right on the Gaza genocide but wrong on Ukraine still to this day to the point they live in a bubble and think the latest shiny weapon will turn the tide in the war in Ukraine even though, by all credible accounts, Ukraine has lost the war.
@@radiotec76 I'm be careful to use the word , that said your American and my e u buffoonery are making great wealth via the war .... Israel reacted in the way calculated by Hamas ..today the Irish wokerati have given recognition to Palestine , despite the human disaster and the use Hamas will make of it .
While the British people were restricted to eating rationed food, Churchill was dining on five course meals, drinking fine wine and smoking expensive cigars.
All wealthy people do this including socialists (and there are plenty of the champagne variety). To think otherwise is just naive. All these foreigners badmouthing Britain (like Yasim Abibi Brown) talk as if all other countries have been virtuous. The British gave the likes of her and millions more a home when they were thrown out of other countries. Hard faced unbelievable cheek I call it. Those who don't like the history, should leave - they never do though do they?
I'm not sure it was all British, my Edwardian aunts couldn't stand him, nor did they see him as a hero. He was an imperialist who couldn't stand the working class
@@carolanngale9333 and I wonder how Stalin fell for his courtship, knowing full well how anti Communist Winston was? Since, I had read that his anti lower class people contempt as well as, towards the natives of the Empire, derived from his genes, infected by his birth through a syphilis infected father!
As far as I can see it. Churchill was a drunken, insolvent war monger, up to his eyes in debt to bankers with an agenda to set up the State of Israel. He was bad news for the British people.
... and a definite 'Ouch!' for Stanford Business School, which he attended a decade or so after various friends of mine. Interesting that when he bacame PM, various outlets called some of his former profs for 'human interest' details. Fair enough. 'Who? Oh. Yes, yes ... I remember him now ... Very pleasant person ... ' In other words, no deep impression. The verdict too, I'm sure, of history.
😂😂....🤔... terrible insight, he's a World Economic Forum stooge.... like Macron, Trudeau etc etc, the cabal including the banking elite though will be directing him
He MADE Big Big Money 💰 and no one in Politics Mafia is Interesting to work for the Future of there Countries We are today Under New Hitlers Nazis Gestapos political Mafia Are is Very Very Dangerous for All Planet Earth God’s blessings to everyone on this Planet Earth Amen 🙏
A vivid memory of my young childhood is seeing, holding and hearing my parents play a memorial set of 2 heavy LPs of Churchill's funeral. Only black and white photos. Long, ceremonial black capes. That bulldog face. That odd, odd voice. That fat cigar. Yet even at 4, I couldn't fall into learned admiration. The whole aura and persona seemed as without meaning as having to stand up in a cinema and silently watch The Queen ride her horse side saddle across the screen before they'd show the film. Thank you, Tariq, for a much more pertinent hour's listening.
Did he mention that the Japanese Imperial Navy (were preventing Grain supplies from reaching India) were also bombarding India & about to invade ? Why do you think he left that tiny detail out ?
Ireland was Britain's first colony. It took 700 years to get freedom for most but not all of Ireland. Partition seems to be an established British tactic in causing problems for newly independent countries from the empire.
Spain (then several different kingdoms) was under Muslim rule for about 700 years. These Muslims invaded from North Africa. In 1492 Castile and Aragon became unified Spain (the core). Centuries of strive, warfare and rule by Muslim invaders lead to a rearrangement. The language, religion (RC) and the structure of society. The strangers within had a choice: adjust of leave. One of those were the Jews, who had sided with the Muslim rulers. Today, Jews still complain about their expulsion and claim Spanish citizenship. When Tarik says that Islam was in Europe, he neglected to tell it was through invasion and conquest. Something he disapproves of when done outside of Europe.
@@delhi93 Yeah, is strange how nowadays Israel behave so badly against muslims, having it centuries of pacific modus vivendi in Spain and Ottoman empire.
Scotland didnt become part of Britain until the treaty of union in 1706. Scotland was Englands first colony, or perhaps areas in France. Creating partition historically was required due to the indigenous peoples trying to eradicate each other in order to grasp power. All of the nations capable of empire building did so, it was common practice to subjugate and dominate other countries and cultures. The practice of fighting with neighbours has been part of human behaviour since way back when. The Scots, English, Irish and Welsh all fought against their own countrymen for thousands of years. The winners are now judged as oppressors.
The winners r considered oppressors bcos of the brutality n subjugation. Sadly no more civilised now than several hundred yrs ago. Still gross human rights violations @@havennewbowtow8835
When the Australian army was coming home to defend us from the Japanese, Churchill diverted our troop ships to defend Borneo instead, leaving Australia totally undefended. He said “I think Australia may have to be mauled a little…”
If you had paid attention during history lessons you would knowthat the Japanes had already invaded New Guinea and had a considerable force in port Moresby which was a mere fifty miles from mainland Australia. Thus the reason why America sent over one million troops to be based in Australia at that time.@@jackrussell3084
Not true Those Australians were taken out of besieged Tobruk at considerable risk by the Royal Navy at Curtin's request prior to Pearl Harbor It was India/Burma that Churchill requested they be sent however due to the speed of the Japanese advance they were sent to New Guinea instead
I am still around,, to tell first hand, Regardless how one feels about old Winston, If it wasn't for him, you younger folk, would have been brought up under a NAZI regime, Try to digest that.----
79 yo remembering my fathers teachings growing up in the welsh coalfields...you sir have verified this...which joins up with my own living history now can recognise again from my father.. He who wins writes the history!!!
Delhi, Indeed, I heard same, like you say from many Sephardic scholars, referring their past lives in muslims Spain till the expulsion of both of them on 1492, and then sephardics, were invited in by the ottoman empire.
Wonderful interview and contribution by Tarik. What a gift he is to the intellectual world with his critical analysis and great communication skills. More of him please in the future. Great work from you both.
Palestine is an area of more than 27 thousand square kilometers and is on the borders of Egypt and Jordan, which historically is part of Palestine and the people of Jordan, more than 70 percent of whom are of Palestinian origin, but Britain made them a state and brought agents to the Jordanian ruling dynasty in order to rule Jordan and protect the occupation from the Jordanian-Palestinian people Palestine Its capital, Jerusalem, is the land of the Palestinian people for tens of thousands of years. It is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it is the third holiest place for us Muslims. It is a land where most of God’s prophets lived, were born, and died. It is the holy and blessed land and the land of the Palestinian and Arab people. Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived there for thousands of years as neighbors and brothers before the Zionists occupied our land. Britain brought them in the Balfour Declaration to occupy our land. Those who committed the Holocaust against the Jews were the Germans and the West, not me.
And it wasn't only the Germans, my friend. Heard of the Dreyfus Case? Why do you think Herzel and Co formed the Zionist movement? The answer is that it was their reaction to a thousand years of European, Christian progroms and discrimination against Jews. Herzel's option - to create Israel in someone else's land - was completely amoral and simply an extension of the notion Europeans have the right to take anyone's land from them. In fact, George Steiner once said in an interview, that the last place on earth you would have expected a holocaust - and I refuse to use capital H because Europeans had been holocausting Africans, Asians, native Americans and Australasians for centuries - to take place was Germany. Then again, we also have total amnesia about the co-operation between the Zionists active in Palestine post-balfour and the Nazis. I refer you to this program: ua-cam.com/video/o9evhLCuA_k/v-deo.htmlsi=wTbGW53bouHi1GN8. Tony Greenstein, interviewed about his book about the co-operation of Nazis and Zionists.
I am NZ Maori, raised in the classic traditions of the British education system. I am 77yrs old and am now able to review the treatment visited upon my people based on the British principle of "divide and conquer". My people are still experiencing(and fighting against) the racism the British brought to NZ after the "discovery" of NZ by Capt. Cook. The comments by Tariq Ali are spot on, and the globe is littered with the shattered remains of countries and cultures of the "Empire upon which the sun never sets". The British hv a lot to answer for but until they acknowledge the arrogant and uncaring actions of their system, Britain will continue it's delusional belief in power and empire, without realising their day has been and gone. Kia ora!
I'm Lebanese/Palestinian and I can completely relate with your comment!! I have a couple of Maori buddies here in Canada and we have Native, indigenous Canadian buddies who have the exact same stories of the exact same colonizers! I completely understand and can sympathize and relate with your people because ive heard the nightmarish stories and they sound so much like my own experiences in Lebanon and the occupied territories in Palestine where i was so close to being shot by a cowardly, iof, terrorist sniper because the iof cowardly rats shot at me to "clear me out!" This is pure, zio cowardly intimidation using terrorism! Its an indication of the way they do things and have been doing things since their dirty inception - underhanded, behind closed doors!! This is how COWARDS fight! In the shadows! FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸 FREE LEBANON 🇱🇧 these euro trash, theives and plunderers have traveled the world and completely destroyed any semblance of peace, security and prosperity in the lands of the native people they subjugate, enslave, grape, pdf file children and murder them when "finished" with them! Palestine and Lebanon are their final colonial project but it's not gonna work out for them! Palestinians and Lebanese are a different breed of warrior all together and that dirty, little rat like zio terror entity has no idea how to deal with them! I know for a fact that these heroic, Levantine warriors do NOT fear death because for them, death is just the beginning! FREE THE MAORI PEOPLE! FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸 FREE LEBANON 🇱🇧
Lol 😂yawn 🙄the people responsible for turning up and using the previous population of new Zealand as a handy free source of protein until you'd eaten them all,and whose entire culture was built on violent warrior traditions of conquest and casual genocide of their annoying neighbours to take their lands..who's first thought and request upon making contact with the British navy was to ask them to help to wipe out their rivals to the last soul, shamelessly going for a gold medal in the oppression Olympics whining to the non existent mythical management about it not being fair anymore because they weren't the winner this time around🙄 where's your dignity and cultural pride ffs dude🙄
I can’t believe that in the 70’s we in the West ate, sex, celebrated full chat while the Palestinian people suffered and are still suffering… We in the West are going to pay…. No, no, no, no doubt….!!!!!!!
the thing about empires is that as they crumble, the pains the exerted on the frontiers get turned inward. the division sowed by the british empire now plagues those in even in England. MI5 monitors all groups moving for positive change, Spycops is a well documented infringement on civil liberty. You had recently roving mobs performing pogroms. Your lands are sold to the highest bidder, your water is no longer yours and your children's future has been walled off
The book "Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree" would have been made a movie if Ali accepted to change 90 % of the characters to Jews 🤔🤔🤔 And when you talk about HOLYWOOD manipulation of the masses, they say you are paranoid.
In the 2nd ww there was a polish officer (intelligence) rotmistrz Pilecki that voluntarily let himsels been arrested to be send to Auschwitz to gather information about how german treated Polish and other prisoners incl Jews there (from the beginning of existance of the camp till when german in 1942 decided to finnaly solve Jewish question overwhelmingly Polish were imprisoned there). After the war when Poland was under soviets occupation with Jewish police, in-juistice and political system he returned after fighting with british in Italy (he escaped from Auschwitz after one year) and was arrested, tortured and executed by the Jews-comunists that had a power than there. When his daybooks appeared in Poland a delegation of Hollywood filmmakers visited his family and proposed to film his story changing his ethnicity to Jewish. The family rejected. Till tiday no polish filmmaker have a courage to film his live.
After being released from the Nazi camp, he pledged his allegiance to the Polish Government-In-Exile, which to all intents and purposes was a British puppet government with very little public support. They refused to participate in the political process that led to the coalition Provisional Government of National Unity, and were henceforth considered to be agents of a hostile foreign power. Thus he was executed for treason.
thank you so much to you and to your guest. It was an hour that runs so fast; so much light shed on here. I dont know who will be your next guest but please, keep going.
As somebody who was sacked and then blacklisted from teaching in 1968: because I wouldn't conform to their thinking, what Tariq has said here makes me feel like it's time for me 'to come out of the woodwork'.
The time IS now. When Darryl Cooper starts releasing his series on WW2, public opinion will have to change. You will be proven right as will the others who challenged the accepted narrative.
Strictly speaking Sunak is prime minister of the United Kingdom not just England..however,you are forgiven for thinking it is only England..British politics are unusual.
Those who will not hear a bad word said a out him say, what about the war, he saved us? The reality is, we didn’t need saving. He(on behalf of his backers), pushed for war with Germany who did not threaten British interests. After Dunkirk, he refused several peace offers from Hitler and, contrary to what so many believe, it was Churchill who ordered the bombing of German cities(a war crime). It was months before Hitler responded with retaliatory strikes. He really isn’t the hero so many believe him to be.
6 місяців тому
The dominant community has dominate the educational institution throughout the the world, HAS and WILL continue to crate fable, if you will to hide their wicked traditions. Sadly, other oppressed people have adopted this nonsense as well. There are many semi-solutions: READING, not any types of reading but selective reading, AVOIDING the stupid tube (T.V.).
@@smt0202 and apparently you don't understand war is a racket. Churchill was put into.power because he was ruthless fair enough. But only because chamberlain understood.the cost of war.. he had just seen the first World War and wanted to avoid it again at all costs even his reputation and job So he was replaced with a dog. I won't be told churchill was some great man. He was no.better than a dog. Caused the deaths of 2 million Indians. I could go on. You know its 2024 now. I can accept my grandparents thinking they were fighting for something its sad but understandable. But with the ability to actually read the real accounts and documentation of how much of a racist disgusting man he was. And how the world wars are basically huge money laundering operations Lick the boots if you want I never will. I'm working class. Not a fool.
With all different Media, Mobile picture, and live truth on ground but main news, Establishment Media lie to people, then imagine how much lies thry told about everything those days???
@freebeerfordworkers interesting comment, not sure who you are referring to. The truth of the Holocaust is not allowed to be discovered!! That’s what we should want to know, why!!!
He used the army daily to kill off as many innocent folks in as many lands as he could as his hero Rhodes and Milner did before . A thief a mass murderer and enabled nearly all the nastiz command to flee to USA via Argentina and Also to the East . He gave up his spy on Gibraltar so they could sail past. His spy in Huttlers office spotted in S America decades after we thought the war was over.
Back up your words with evidence. otherwise it's just slander, contemptible slander. Remember, a racist is not a racist due to some spoken words, a racist is someone who's every action reveals the kind of mind behind it.
@@Scoubidou-if1of It’s a well known and documented fact about Gandhis anti-black racism. In 2019, on the 150th anniversary of Gandhi's birth, Manchester students even rejected a 9ft statue of the man along with a demanded for an apology from the council because of Mahatma Gandhi ‘s"well-documented anti-black racism”…You need to do some basic research, before you go accusing others of slander.
Magnificent interview, briliant intelect, both interviewer and interviewie! Tariq Ali should became world famous. I will endevour to research his work and read his books. During the debacle at the Darnnells during WWI, Churchill was Lord of the Admiralty, position which he coveted intensely but performed so poorly he was demoted and spent many years during which his carreer was in the doldrums until WWII begun and he was given the Premiership of Britain, for lack of interest in the position, by all other possible candidates. Nobody wanted it, and thus someone in power suggested: "Give it to Winston", ressurrecting his career. By then, he was a heavy drinker, and by the end of the war, he was an alcoholic!!
We hardly talk about the Indian Bengal Holocaust committed by the British. Commonly known as the Bengal Famine. 3 Million or more Indians killed. We have barely scratched the surface of what happened and it's not even covered as much as Jallianwalla Bagh or Amritsar.
Winston Churchill was one of the worst monsters of 20th century. Just incredible how many crimes he committed from Africa to India, from Ireland to Palestine, from WW1 to WW2 and between. Endless manipulation, machinations, betrayal of his own allies and in the end the betrayal of the Empire.
I’ve watched this man since I was a teenager. He’s never, ever in half a century, ever had anything ever good to say about Britain. Apart from a good, safe and comfortable living off this country, what good has he done and why is he here?
If you have watched him since you were a teenager is because you are interested in what he has got to say, are you not?, therefore You and only You should not be a "traitor" to him
Thank you Tariq for revealing the other side of this imperialist, stubborn, bully Churchill. I suppose that part of his character was what made him determined to beat the Nazis. So these characteristics came in useful for Britain in his later life.
@@leoninocat5070 3 out of 5 Nazi’s were killed by Russian soldiers. The Russian people paid the highest price for defeating the Nazi scourge - 26 million Russians killed in WW2
The whole western alliance combined did very little work to defeat the Fascist. The largest impact was by the USSR. The Anglo-Saxons joined the Russians online because of the horrible fear of communism.
The claim that Germany was a threat to France and England was part of Churchills narrative anyway, but far away from the truth. For France and England, Germany was never a threat. Churchill just proclaimed Germany to be a threat.
The following quote nails it down with regard to the recent war-mongering stance of Western imperialism against people without power and the barbaric, genocidal cultural hegemony that's justifying it: "Allowances can be made for Mr. Churchill's statement, however unworthy, in the first flush of his victory. No such excuse could be found for me in this quieter atmosphere. There are, however some things which it is my duty to say, some things which it is essential to say. I shall try to say them as dispassionately as I can. Mr. Churchill makes it clear that, in certain circumstances, he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain's necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean Britain's necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people's rights were not to count. It is quite true that other great Powers believe in this same code-in their own regard-and have behaved in accordance with it. That is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars-World War No. 1 and World War No. 2-and shall it be World War No. 3? Surely Mr. Churchill must see that if his contention be admitted in our regard, a like justification can be framed for similar acts of aggression elsewhere and no small nation adjoining a great Power could ever hope to be permitted to go it own way in peace." (Eamon de Valera's response to victory-drunk imperialist Churchill, May 1945)
Spot on. However, I don't think the US will be able to project militarily like it did. There are cheap asymmetric technologies that could make this impossible
The British aren't British, they're Angles and Saxons, they're from Germany, Belgium, Netherlands etc. Real British, the "Ancient Britons" are Scotland, Ireland, Wales and ever since then the Angles and Saxons have been at war with the Ancient Britons, dragging them into its banking wars against other empires.
ah yes, when bad things come to light the brits will say it was the germans. A british classic. When a German comes around and tells the brits they are our cousins, suddenly you brits dont want to have anything to do with that at all and proclaim that "most traces of anglo-saxon blood are long gone and mixed in with the rest of the british isles".
It's a little more complicated than that. You might want to factor in the Normans, the Vikings, the Danes and I'm just scratching the surface. The populations of Scotland, Ireland and Wales are far from being Ancient Britons and the population of England is far from being Anglo-Saxon. You might want to dig a bit deeper into the complex history.
@@TheBlackfall234 All I am saying is the Britons have suffered the same fate as the Germans tribes and the French tribes and the Russian tribes and any colonial outpost's original inhabitants by a group that holds itself ABOVE ALL OTHERS. The Britons are long gone just like the Italians and many others, both sacrificed to die for those who control them.
@@littlefluffybushbaby7256 Regardless of how uncomplicated I made the statement, I at least made the statement. If I went into details of all the tribal wars the essence of the statement would be lost. The point is the Britons are as much a victim of British rule as anyone. 1845-52 British invasion of Ireland 3-5 million starved, crops and livestock stolen, land stolen, deeds burnt, forged documents put in place and the world was told it was a "potato famine." Plus the soldiers sent to die in wars.
@@truthlifefishing1730 I think when things are boiled down to simple statements it misses out much of the context and facts. It's about persuation, not truth. There is a reason that history books are not one paragraph long. Miss out 99% of the facts and you can prove whatever you want to prove. Much of what you've already said is either wrong, or at best a partial truth.
excellent interview, I am loving the book on Churchill written by Tariq, His Times His Crimes, real eye opener for sure. Especially as I'm also reading Churchills history of WW2 and up to book 4 now!!
Humbled to be able to listen to such a great human being and brilliant mind. I adored the quintet, every single word of them. Now reading with great pleasure Churchill’s bio. Thank you
Churchill hated the Russians vicariously. At the time he probably believed that Russia was an irreducible enemy of English imperialism. Perhaps he imagined that England had a mission to conquer the inferior, barbarian, uncivilized, communist Slavs who had overthrown the Tsar's monarchy and defeated the White Army and its allies during the civil war. But the truth is that, viewed from a distance, Churchill had a deep reason to hate Russian culture and literature. “… I also remember that, in my article, I developed the idea that all… say, for example, the legislators and founders of humanity, starting with the oldest and continuing with Lycurgus, Solon, Muhammad, Napoleon, etc. etc., everyone, from the first to the last, had been criminals, if only because, when promulgating new laws, they abolished the old ones, considered sacred by society and ancestors, and certainly would not have stopped before the blood , whenever this (sometimes poured out with all innocence and virtue, in defense of the old laws) could be useful to them. It is also significant that most of these benefactors and founders of humanity were bloodthirsty, especially ferocious. In short: I concluded from this that all individuals, not only the great ones, but also those who moved a little away from vulgarity, that is, also those who are capable of saying something new, would have the obligation, by their very nature , of being infallibly criminal… to a greater or lesser extent, naturally. Otherwise, it would be difficult for them to get out of vulgarity, and they cannot conform to staying there, even for the same reason as their nature and, in my opinion, they even have an obligation not to conform. In short: as you can see, so far, this is nothing particularly new. This has already been printed and read thousands of times. As regards my distinction between ordinary and extraordinary men, I agree that it is somewhat arbitrary; but I didn't quote exact numbers. I only have faith in my essential idea, which is that which consists in saying concretely that individuals are divided, according to the law of nature, into two categories: the inferior (that of the vulgar), that is, if I may say so, the material, which is only useful for the procreation of the species, and that of individuals who have the gift or intelligence to say a new word among themselves. …” (CRIME AND PUNISHMENT, Fyodor Dostoevsky, p. 281 Winston Churchill was an embodiment of the criminal statesman who historically and politically manufactures his own impunity as described and honored by Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov in Dostoevsky's novel Crime and Punishment. He must have seen himself portrayed in the book, didn't like what he saw and buried it deep in his unconscious mind. This wound expressed itself consciously through the contempt and hatred that Churchill felt towards Russia.
Thank you for this report. I’ve been waiting for years for someone to report on Churchill’s racist policies. The division of Ireland. The famine in Bengal. And what will be the cause of WW3, the expulsion of the Palestinian people from their homeland and almost a hundred years of brutal persecution.
It's more to do with the ruling elite and everyone else. The likes of Churchill have no more love for working class white people than they do for working class black people.
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb The purpose of learning history is to not repeat the crimes of the past. Even here in Canada, we pay lip service to our less than stellar past, while continuing to do the same things to our indigenous population.
@@erikhai1 the purpose of history is to know the good the bad and the mundane. You are not responsible for anything you didn't do good or bad. Everyone born in Canada is indigenous to it. Support liberty and justice for all and everyone will be better off ♥️
El Cid was a Moor and few people know this! The beautiful mingling and collaboration between the cultures of old Spain were a high point of our humanity.
It is good this Pakistani man is allowed to criticise the West, while living in the West. However, he would never be allowed to criticise the Ottoman empire, while living in Turkey. The Ottoman Turks murdered a million Armenians in 1915. The Turk's starved a million Lebanese in 1918. Criticising Turkey's past carries the penalty of insulting Turkishness.
Brave AI w/Leo The Moors, who were African Muslim people from North Africa, made significant contributions to Europe's development in the areas of crops, irrigation systems, and agricultural techniques during their 700-year occupation of Spain. Some of the key contributions include: 1. New crops: The Moors introduced new crops such as rice, citrus fruits, and cotton to Europe, which helped to diversify the European diet and improve food security. 2. Irrigation systems: The Moors developed advanced irrigation systems, such as the qanat system, which allowed for the cultivation of crops in areas with limited rainfall. This technology was later adopted by European farmers and helped to increase crop yields. 3. Agricultural techniques: The Moors introduced new agricultural techniques, such as crop rotation and the use of fertilizers, which helped to improve soil fertility and increase crop yields. They also developed advanced methods of grape cultivation, which led to the development of high-quality wines in regions such as Rioja. These contributions helped to transform the agricultural landscape of Europe and played a significant role in the development of the continent's economy and culture.
Tariq has to update his knowledge of China's tech prowess. They not only produce. 5 millimeter chips, they are building their own chipmaking equipment so as to stop relying on the Norway for these machines. China is probably the only country that is vertically and horizontally industrially integrated.
You mean 5 _nano metre_ chips? And it's the Netherlands - not Norway. The 'nm' labels are more of a naming convention than a reference to dimensions and are largely a marketing term. It will take 10 yrs or longer for would-be chip fabricators to establish the technology and expertise of the dutch foundries - everyone would be doing it if it were easy. This is one reason why Taiwan has such importance. Chip design is the corresponding technology to fabrication, and Israel is dominant in this area - Intel chips have been designed there for years. Those 'trusted platform modules' were not put there for _our_ benefit.
I just bought this book and it is brilliant. It's not just Churchill but an amazing historical perspective with Churchill in it. On of the best if not the best political history books I've ever read.
Churchills mother was jewish, and his dead father owed money to the jews. Noone is asking where he could have gotten the money to have a large estate with gardeners, servents etc, on his ordinary politicians salery. England, France and America! Who is ruling?
The jolly heretic wrote a book: churchills head master and explored churchills life. E Michael Jones has spoken and written about Churchill and his ills many times.
1. He was an aristoctrat. 2. He was an author. 3. He wasn't always in a good financial position. At least do a little bit of reading up before you pour out your antisemitism.
@@YogaladyToronto Churchill Father is known to have taken a huge amount of money to lobby for the establishment of the terrorist Supremacist occupation in Palestine.
Churchill's war narrative still has a heavy imprint on the way many people see WW2, its origins and its history (also because it fed into the Hollywood narratives of the war). He still has that privilege to a much larger degree than let's say general de Gaulle, who also wrote some very interesting war memoirs and who was a formative political figure into the 1960s. The myth that almost nobody in British politics but Churchill and his friends really saw the threat of Hitler is very much part of his own narrative: he didn't want to recognize that people within the Labour party had also been warning against the Nazis, or that the French socialist government in 1936-37 had also tried to mobilize Europe against Berlin. Churchill must have understood, around the end of WW2, that even though Hitler had been defeated. the war had also dealt a mortal blow to the British Empire itself. Both Roosevelt and Stalin had told him during the conferences of the war (Tehran, for example) that they were not sending millions of their own young men into the fight to hand back the empire to Britain on a silver platter. Once the war is over, they told him, you Brits will have to start dismantling your own empire. And he knew that the Japanese had also shown to people all over Asia that the whites where by no means unbeatable. He needed the support of both the US and the Soviet Union, so he had to accept the "orders" to prepare for giving up on much of the empire. As he was voted out in 1945, he didn't have to do the job personally, but the liberation of India was a pretty much inevitable step, and without the possession of British India, much of the rest of the empire was rather pointless and would not carry its own costs in a meaningful way. Churchill knew that the war had finished the British Empire in its classic sense, but he didn't want that to be part of the story of the war, so he kept this out of his own history/war memoirs (first volume in 1948). Of course his accounts of British diplomacy during the war were highly edited too and adapted to the story he wanted.
That Germany was a threat to britain, wich you seem to still believe according to the first part of your comment, is ironically enough.... just part of Churchills Narrative. The truth is, that Germany was never a threat to neither France nor England. So any narrative evolving around the "german threat" from British or French Perspective, is nothing but propaganda. England and France were never threatened. Thats just part of the Narrative to make it look like Churchill wanted a War that was necessary. The Sad Reality is, that Churchill wanted a War that was unnecessary. So Churchills Narrative really isnt "We saw Hitler as a threat before anyone else". Churchills Narrative is "Hitler is a threat to us" while he never really was.
An excellent documentary, well balanced and such a relief to hear such a thoughtful reasoning mind. Until we hear the 'other' side of the story we will only ever know half the facts.
Churchill was a great racist. I own a Churchill book from early, early 1900's, 1904? And he is most definitely a racist. A lot of Brits get mad at me when I suggest that Churchill IS a racist. But, it is true.
As a Brit, this bloke has benefitted considerably from what he considers to be his country's wrong doings. He also seems to spend a lot of his time in a country he despises and continues to benefit from his country's tolerance of his views. Perhaps he should consider donating a substantial part of his personal fortune to the peoples that his country, in his view, has exploited!
“I think a curse should rest on me - because I love this war. I know it’s smashing and shattering the lives of thousands every moment - and yet - I can’t help it - I enjoy every second of it.”- Winston Churchill letter to a friend
Re 1914-19
For this alone he should be condemned
He enjoyed bIood, not his own of course. But he was eager to sacrifice everyone and everything for his personal ambition. Probably the worst monster of 20th century.
He attacked japan,they attacked america, icke
Then why did he end the war?
ME TO
He was the Zionist of that time, the demon, right? I'm in shock reading this comment
“History would be a wonderful thing, if only it was true”. Tolstoy!! NZ.
Churchill was a privileged member of the ruling class. He was no friend of the ordinary working man and his life and actions need seeing in context. As a working class Brit, I dislike him immensely.
But he loved the working classes as cannon fodder,for impearialist wars.
Agree
Nobody cares.
@@FiveLiverNobody cares what you have to say
Winston Churchill was one of the worst monsters of 20th century. Just incredible how many crimes he committed from Africa to India, from Ireland to Palestine, from WW1 to WW2 and between. Endless manipulation, machinations, betrayal of his own allies and in the end the betrayal of the Empire.
Listening to Tariq Ali is a breath of fresh and vital air. I attended a talk by Mr. Ali in Toronto years ago; he is as vital to our education now as then. Thank you for this great interview.
he is one of those voices I can listen to all day and night. love learning from him
Pues se equivoca cuando dice q los argentinos somos estúpidos 😢
@@knitpurlcreations wha where did he say that
Yeh, right; whatever.
@@robinbreeds9217 bloodshed the British put a stop to? can you provide some examples please?
I could listen to this man talk about anything. What a voice
I was just thinking i wish i had his voice😂
I was educated in England during the 1960's. My history teacher was a gem - he showed us that Churchill was an entitled drunk who loved to tell stories, especially about himself! British empire? ended not soon enough for the native citizens. I am an English woman living in Ireland - and I am blessed to be welcomed here.
luck you, how are you coping with those invaders in setting up tents?
Your teacher was like many such 1960's and since was clearly an indoctrinated marxist, the very people who over recent years have wrecked Europe and brainwashed kids with their far left ideology. The same ideology which wrecked and took over Ireland since the '60's, and which they are protesting about right now as they see the native Irish being replaced, and treated as 2nd class citizens. We've all seen how 'entitled' champagne socialists are.
Where would you be living without Churchill?
@@FiveLiver In Ireland!
@@FiveLiver The man has been dead since 1965, and the world has gone through at lot of changes, with or without him! Except the state of the UK it finds itself in presently? He must be rolling in his grave the sod.
Time alters many things. Tariq is a national and international treasure these days. He wasn't always thought of in such terms in his youth, but he stuck to reason in his arguments and has been proven to be correct. His comment on Braverman was spot on.
All pm are conditioned the the role, nothing he says has not been prepared by those guys behind the curtain
Both my grandfathers fought in WW2 and they both hated Churchill and the whole officer class.. they voted him out as soon as they could after the war
@mcjeebus with all due respect that's an easy and lazy response.. I don't accept that the war was won by one person and both my grandfather's earned the right to be critical when they put thier lives on the line.. several times
@mcjeebusUtter BS
As my dad was an 🇺🇸 officer in 101st Airborne who was sent to England a year before the invasion to build those camps he hated the class system of Britain and are with the working class along with pleasure time as his ancestors found in Kent having followed William from Normandy with my maternal ancestors from German Jews and Scots Irish to American colonies before War of Independence hate any class system.
@@DaveyNaples its a repsonse, based on Churchills Lies.
Mcjeebus simply is the naiv type whod be like "at least we arent speaking german" even tho, England was never at Danger from Germany at all.
They lied to people those days, just like they lie to people these days.
This history is only untold in England and Hollywood, everyone else knows what Churchill was....😔
Sadly, not everyone. Less that a fraction of the world's population knew and most of the dominant population simply do not care because they do not consider others as human.
Same with the royal family, without know their horrific crimes
@@sylviabriggs4087😂
That's not true.
I grew up in Poland and Churchill was hailed as a hero there.
@@theclumsyprepper what for? handing your country to the Germans then to the Russians?🤔
I kind of knew the European empires, and now the US Empire, had done bad things. October 7th was the catalyst that plunged me into the mind shattering cold waters of a rabbit hole. A rabbit hole I still haven't crawled out of. The extent of the suffering caused by the European Continent makes you want to sit down and take a beat. I can't believe I didn't know ANY of this. I feel like I've been sleepwalking for the past 30 years... And in the words of Norman Finkelstein: "I am not Pro-Palestine and I am not anti-israel. I am PRO-Truth, and I am PRO-Justice!"
Thank you for this interview. We all need to be more exposed to this kind of content 🙏.
Every empire has and is doing bad things. European empires are no better or worse than those of the past and the ones those that are emerging today. The only thing that separates the recently disappeared European empires and the China of today, is that many Europeans feel bad about what their empires did. Right now most Chinese are proud of what their empire is doing, just as those Europeans were 150 years ago.
Because you've only been brainwashed to hate Europeans that gives you a distorted perspective on history. You speak of the "extent of suffering caused by the European continent" but are not even aware of the Arab Muslim slave trade in Africa and Europe. Nor are you aware of the slave trade that Africans implemented themselves for centuries before the Europeans ever set foot there. What of the tens of millions murdered by Genghis Khan and the Mongols? The millions of captives sacrificed and enslaved by the Aztecs? The millions butchered by the Mughal Turks who took over India? Etc, etc, etc. If anything the west has enlightened the world, giving it the very concept of human rights and liberal progress that you use to condemn it.
I stumbled on the truth over twenty years ago. So glad you finally discovered the truth. If the attack on the 7th. did anything, it prompted people like you to take a look under the hood and see who the real villains are in the piece. Please keep reading and learning. There are many atrocities in history which most people are unaware of. The Armenian Holocaust, the Irish potato famine, the Rape of Nanking, The death camps in Cambodia, Tol Sleng being the worst, Unit 731 in Japanese controlled China where the most Arrtociouse medical experiments were performed on innocent Chinese prisoners, Mau's five year plan, Stalin's agricultural colectivization plans in the Ukraine. The British Empire had the Atlantic slave trade, the selling of Opium to Chinese citizens, leading to the Opium wars between those two nations. British Empire rape of india. And msny more southern hemisphere countries. And today we have the Genocidal revenge mission by Israel in Gaza.
@@VaucluseVanguardPlease explain just what is China doing to anyone which compares it to the British Empire ! Which nations has China invaded and extracted their mineral wealth from lately !
@@VaucluseVanguard Europe pretends to be all about human rights, dignity, and so-called freedom (when it suits them). China at least doesn't seem as keen to blow smoke up people's arses by pretending to be other than what they are.
“Where you stand depends on where you sit.” - Nelson Mandela
Divide and rule is the way the British ruled in all colonial countries they ruled. The division of Cyprus is another example. The British still have sovereign bases in Cyprus. It is one of the colonial countries that the British still have a foothold today.
Cyprus was divided by the Turkish invasion in the 70s
Oh, and Gibraltar. The Brits have not once in their history of rape and pillage attempted to atone, let alone admit their genocidal history.
Pretty sure that was turkey
Because people aren't divided without the British doing so. Such nonsense.
@@newadam573 Yes, dear, such nonsense. All we are talking about is the colonial victims of British rule: India, the Middle East, just two blatant examples. I know, you're a Sassenach and believe in the Monarchy and that the sun should never set on the British Empire...
Churchill said "History will be kind to me, I will write it myself." And he did.
A real butt hole to the end.
Any historian will tell you Winston churchills memoirs are not historical fact. Winston Churchill didnt write the history, he wrote his version of history. Historians wrote the history based on research of credible sources, of which there are many of the 20th century.
😂
Winston Churchill didnt write history he wrote his memoirs, which any historian will tell you are heavily biased and not historical fact. Historians wrote the history based on credible sources, of which there are many in that period.
@@Oxnaforda That may be true, but what he wrote is copied by historians and taught to us as history.
True history no matter how ugly will set your mind free. Thank you for this discussion.
History white washed by elites in the past and still now, who will put their ilk in a good light usually to preserve their power and money interests are hardly trustworthy. Someone though, who has reasearched the outcomes of the ones who have been effected by their greed and lust for power are the voice's I would trust especially when you make note that there are enough documented histories of them subjugating others.
@user-ed6ff3bb4i It is traumatising for you to challenge the image of Churchill as a virtuous, benevolent and wise ruler that has been cultivated in your mind since childhood?
Because you're proud to be British, right? Churchill doesn't stand for Britain any more than Stalin stands for Russia. There are things to be proud of mate. But don't be proud of the imperialism, genocide and exploitation. Only c/nts are proud of that stuff
You are easily fooled
Yes you are, by your own, fool.
Your interview with Tariq Ali was a gem. As an American I was fascinated by his opinions on the U.S. hegemony and I totally agree, after listening to that raving sociopath Victoria Nuland on a U.S. Sunday chat show advocating targeting sites inside Russia with U.S. weapons, I agree with Tariq Ali that my country would go so far as to destroy the world to maintain hegemony over it.
She is a hag, putting it lightly.
I don’t think that it’s the real Americans that is if you can find any who are not Zionists. The fact that the Israelis think that because some heads of state who had no authority from the Palestinians decided to ease their conscience by shifting the problem to the Middle East and in particular to Palestine is unconscionable to say the least. To forcibly move those people who were simple people who had no idea what was happening to them and to justify it by silencing the world for75 years. What other nationality had that privilege. In the meantime the rothschilds Rockefeller’s etc became richer and more powerful to the point where they can silence everyone except the students. They’re not afraid of wealth or power. They not afraid to voice their discontent and to protest against these gross inequality and atrocities on basically defenceless people. It is outrages that the so called civilised western civilisation can breach to other countries on morals and ethics. Especially regarding women. When woman in the west are raped on a daily basis physically assaulted murdered used as sexual objects and preach to the Muslims where if anything like that happened their is no second chance for any of the perpetrators. But hypocrisy is the name of the game lies and distortion of the truth. What came out on the 7 October immediately after the uprising by Hamas. The narrative was the atrocities these people were supposed to have committed against Israelis. 40 babies killed and beheaded. Did anyone ask where these freedom fighters could find 40 babies to kill was any video released to show this were any parents crying over their dead babies. No. Complete lies. Than we had the rape accusations and I ask you when your fighting for your life are you going to have time to rape anyone. This has also been proven to be a lie. But the Zionists networks and in particular piers Morgan repeats that narrative over and over again. And what about reparations for those people whose homes were forcibly taken and their land. No reparations unlike Germany and other nations who removed the Jews from their homes and still pay their families. Anyway the west is obviously lost its way and hopefully Americans will not vote for either trump or Biden instead vote for people who are not the puppets of the Zionists and maybe America can be fair and just.
You should distinguish between your country , surely , and it's leadership , surely ..as a liberal ...? Nach a ?
@@aodhfinn, there are a lot of people in my country, the United States, who are right on the Gaza genocide but wrong on Ukraine still to this day to the point they live in a bubble and think the latest shiny weapon will turn the tide in the war in Ukraine even though, by all credible accounts, Ukraine has lost the war.
@@radiotec76 I'm be careful to use the word , that said your American and my e u buffoonery are making great wealth via the war .... Israel reacted in the way calculated by Hamas ..today the Irish wokerati have given recognition to Palestine , despite the human disaster and the use Hamas will make of it .
While the British people were restricted to eating rationed food, Churchill was dining on five course meals, drinking fine wine and smoking expensive cigars.
All wealthy people do this including socialists (and there are plenty of the champagne variety). To think otherwise is just naive. All these foreigners badmouthing Britain (like Yasim Abibi Brown) talk as if all other countries have been virtuous. The British gave the likes of her and millions more a home when they were thrown out of other countries. Hard faced unbelievable cheek I call it. Those who don't like the history, should leave - they never do though do they?
Well nothing’s changed with modern government, has it?!
Drunk by lunch time and running a bloody country and when I say bloody that’s what it was ,
@@imranb4985nothing but it would be so good if people stood up and remembered the government work for us and we pay their Nasara salary
Don't forget the Scotch whisky.
Churchill was a hero for the British and a Monster to everyone else.
I'm not sure it was all British, my Edwardian aunts couldn't stand him, nor did they see him as a hero. He was an imperialist who couldn't stand the working class
@@carolanngale9333 and I wonder how Stalin fell for his courtship, knowing full well how anti Communist Winston was? Since, I had read that his anti lower class people contempt as well as, towards the natives of the Empire, derived from his genes, infected by his birth through a syphilis infected father!
As far as I can see it. Churchill was a drunken, insolvent war monger, up to his eyes in debt to bankers with an agenda to set up the State of Israel. He was bad news for the British people.
Yes, FDR was a small "D" democrat and he kind of enjoyed saying "No" to Churchill the Imperialist.
The guards at Auschwitz and Belsen didn’t much like him either.. 😁
"Rishi Sunak, a second rate banker" and Prime Minister of England. Great insight.
... and a definite 'Ouch!' for Stanford Business School, which he attended a decade or so after various friends of mine. Interesting that when he bacame PM, various outlets called some of his former profs for 'human interest' details. Fair enough. 'Who? Oh. Yes, yes ... I remember him now ... Very pleasant person ... ' In other words, no deep impression. The verdict too, I'm sure, of history.
😂😂....🤔... terrible insight, he's a World Economic Forum stooge.... like Macron, Trudeau etc etc, the cabal including the banking elite though will be directing him
Macron, Rothschild banker. Pattern?
😂😂😂😂, yes.
He MADE Big Big Money 💰 and no one in Politics Mafia is Interesting to work for the Future of there Countries
We are today Under New Hitlers Nazis Gestapos political Mafia Are is Very Very Dangerous for All Planet Earth
God’s blessings to everyone on this Planet Earth
Amen 🙏
A vivid memory of my young childhood is seeing, holding and hearing my parents play a memorial set of 2 heavy LPs of Churchill's funeral. Only black and white photos. Long, ceremonial black capes. That bulldog face. That odd, odd voice. That fat cigar. Yet even at 4, I couldn't fall into learned admiration. The whole aura and persona seemed as without meaning as having to stand up in a cinema and silently watch The Queen ride her horse side saddle across the screen before they'd show the film.
Thank you, Tariq, for a much more pertinent hour's listening.
Did he mention that the Japanese Imperial Navy (were preventing Grain supplies from reaching India) were also bombarding India & about to invade ? Why do you think he left that tiny detail out ?
Ireland was Britain's first colony. It took 700 years to get freedom for most but not all of Ireland.
Partition seems to be an established British tactic in causing problems for newly independent countries from the empire.
True. But there's an Irishman here complaining that others don't respect the western British for their achievements.
Spain (then several different kingdoms) was under Muslim rule for about 700 years. These Muslims invaded from North Africa. In 1492 Castile and Aragon became unified Spain (the core). Centuries of strive, warfare and rule by Muslim invaders lead to a rearrangement.
The language, religion (RC) and the structure of society. The strangers within had a choice: adjust of leave. One of those were the Jews, who had sided with the Muslim rulers.
Today, Jews still complain about their expulsion and claim Spanish citizenship.
When Tarik says that Islam was in Europe, he neglected to tell it was through invasion and conquest. Something he disapproves of when done outside of Europe.
@@delhi93
Yeah, is strange how nowadays Israel behave so badly against muslims, having it centuries of pacific modus vivendi in Spain and Ottoman empire.
Scotland didnt become part of Britain until the treaty of union in 1706. Scotland was Englands first colony, or perhaps areas in France.
Creating partition historically was required due to the indigenous peoples trying to eradicate each other in order to grasp power.
All of the nations capable of empire building did so, it was common practice to subjugate and dominate other countries and cultures.
The practice of fighting with neighbours has been part of human behaviour since way back when. The Scots, English, Irish and Welsh all fought against their own countrymen for thousands of years.
The winners are now judged as oppressors.
The winners r considered oppressors bcos of the brutality n subjugation. Sadly no more civilised now than several hundred yrs ago. Still gross human rights violations @@havennewbowtow8835
When the Australian army was coming home to defend us from the Japanese, Churchill diverted our troop ships to defend Borneo instead, leaving Australia totally undefended. He said “I think Australia may have to be mauled a little…”
How were Japanese going to land troops in Australia, Row boats or swimming?
Famous words from the greatest racist in the British Empire.
If you had paid attention during history lessons you would knowthat the Japanes had already invaded New Guinea and had a considerable force in port Moresby which was a mere fifty miles from mainland Australia. Thus the reason why America sent over one million troops to be based in Australia at that time.@@jackrussell3084
@@jackrussell3084 Churchill was same rac*ist as Hit*ler
Not true
Those Australians were taken out of besieged Tobruk at considerable risk by the Royal Navy at Curtin's request prior to Pearl Harbor
It was India/Burma that Churchill requested they be sent however due to the speed of the Japanese advance they were sent to New Guinea instead
All my relatives of Grandparent age hated Churchill.
I am still around,, to tell first hand, Regardless how one feels about old Winston, If it wasn't for him, you younger folk, would have been brought up under a NAZI regime, Try to digest that.----
79 yo remembering my fathers teachings growing up in the welsh coalfields...you sir have verified this...which joins up with my own living history now can recognise again from my father..
He who wins writes the history!!!
Yes I’m the same having being influenced by my dad in the coal fields of the NE.
He will always be my hero.
Just ordered Tariq Ali's book on Churchill. Looking foward to reading it.
How’s the book so far?
“Mr. Spielberg loves your script !
But only one condition : make all the good guys Jews and not Muslims.”
The strange thing is, that jews from all strains will vehemently declare that they had it very good in Islamic Spain and in the Ottoman Empire.
@@delhi93 Sources?
Sources??...listen to this doc.before you reveal your prejudices
Yes what most do not understand.
Spielberg is just another propagandist.
Delhi, Indeed, I heard same, like you say from many Sephardic scholars, referring their past lives in muslims Spain till the expulsion of both of them on 1492, and then sephardics, were invited in by the ottoman empire.
So informative, thank you!
Wonderful interview and contribution by Tarik. What a gift he is to the intellectual world with his critical analysis and great communication skills. More of him please in the future. Great work from you both.
Palestine is an area of more than 27 thousand square kilometers and is on the borders of Egypt and Jordan, which historically is part of Palestine and the people of Jordan, more than 70 percent of whom are of Palestinian origin, but Britain made them a state and brought agents to the Jordanian ruling dynasty in order to rule Jordan and protect the occupation from the Jordanian-Palestinian people Palestine Its capital, Jerusalem, is the land of the Palestinian people for tens of thousands of years. It is the cradle of Christianity and Judaism, and it is the third holiest place for us Muslims. It is a land where most of God’s prophets lived, were born, and died. It is the holy and blessed land and the land of the Palestinian and Arab people. Muslims, Jews, and Christians lived there for thousands of years as neighbors and brothers before the Zionists occupied our land. Britain brought them in the Balfour Declaration to occupy our land. Those who committed the Holocaust against the Jews were the Germans and the West, not me.
And it wasn't only the Germans, my friend. Heard of the Dreyfus Case? Why do you think Herzel and Co formed the Zionist movement? The answer is that it was their reaction to a thousand years of European, Christian progroms and discrimination against Jews. Herzel's option - to create Israel in someone else's land - was completely amoral and simply an extension of the notion Europeans have the right to take anyone's land from them. In fact, George Steiner once said in an interview, that the last place on earth you would have expected a holocaust - and I refuse to use capital H because Europeans had been holocausting Africans, Asians, native Americans and Australasians for centuries - to take place was Germany. Then again, we also have total amnesia about the co-operation between the Zionists active in Palestine post-balfour and the Nazis. I refer you to this program: ua-cam.com/video/o9evhLCuA_k/v-deo.htmlsi=wTbGW53bouHi1GN8. Tony Greenstein, interviewed about his book about the co-operation of Nazis and Zionists.
For thousands of years it was the Holy Land and it only took the Zionists only seventy six years to turn it into the "Horror Land"
I thought it was all the way to the Iraquí border?
Arab Muslims were Nazi allies.
Well said. 👏 Inconvenient facts the West doesn't want to acknowledge.
I am NZ Maori, raised in the classic traditions of the British education system. I am 77yrs old and am now able to review the treatment visited upon my people based on the British principle of "divide and conquer". My people are still experiencing(and fighting against) the racism the British brought to NZ after the "discovery" of NZ by Capt. Cook. The comments by Tariq Ali are spot on, and the globe is littered with the shattered remains of countries and cultures of the "Empire upon which the sun never sets". The British hv a lot to answer for but until they acknowledge the arrogant and uncaring actions of their system, Britain will continue it's delusional belief in power and empire, without realising their day has been and gone. Kia ora!
I'm Lebanese/Palestinian and I can completely relate with your comment!! I have a couple of Maori buddies here in Canada and we have Native, indigenous Canadian buddies who have the exact same stories of the exact same colonizers! I completely understand and can sympathize and relate with your people because ive heard the nightmarish stories and they sound so much like my own experiences in Lebanon and the occupied territories in Palestine where i was so close to being shot by a cowardly, iof, terrorist sniper because the iof cowardly rats shot at me to "clear me out!"
This is pure, zio cowardly intimidation using terrorism! Its an indication of the way they do things and have been doing things since their dirty inception - underhanded, behind closed doors!! This is how COWARDS fight! In the shadows!
FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸
FREE LEBANON 🇱🇧
these euro trash, theives and plunderers have traveled the world and completely destroyed any semblance of peace, security and prosperity in the lands of the native people they subjugate, enslave, grape, pdf file children and murder them when "finished" with them!
Palestine and Lebanon are their final colonial project but it's not gonna work out for them! Palestinians and Lebanese are a different breed of warrior all together and that dirty, little rat like zio terror entity has no idea how to deal with them!
I know for a fact that these heroic, Levantine warriors do NOT fear death because for them, death is just the beginning!
FREE THE MAORI PEOPLE!
FREE PALESTINE 🇵🇸
FREE LEBANON 🇱🇧
Lol 😂yawn 🙄the people responsible for turning up and using the previous population of new Zealand as a handy free source of protein until you'd eaten them all,and whose entire culture was built on violent warrior traditions of conquest and casual genocide of their annoying neighbours to take their lands..who's first thought and request upon making contact with the British navy was to ask them to help to wipe out their rivals to the last soul, shamelessly going for a gold medal in the oppression Olympics whining to the non existent mythical management about it not being fair anymore because they weren't the winner this time around🙄 where's your dignity and cultural pride ffs dude🙄
I can’t believe that in the 70’s we in the West ate, sex, celebrated full chat while the Palestinian people suffered and are still suffering… We in the West are going to pay…. No, no, no, no doubt….!!!!!!!
Long live Israel
populated mainly by european khazarians, whose ancestors incredibly have never even set foot in the sytia-Palestina of Roman times.
the thing about empires is that as they crumble, the pains the exerted on the frontiers get turned inward. the division sowed by the british empire now plagues those in even in England. MI5 monitors all groups moving for positive change, Spycops is a well documented infringement on civil liberty. You had recently roving mobs performing pogroms. Your lands are sold to the highest bidder, your water is no longer yours and your children's future has been walled off
@@joseplaza9442 Cringe 😆
The book "Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree" would have been made a movie if Ali accepted to change 90 % of the characters to Jews 🤔🤔🤔 And when you talk about HOLYWOOD manipulation of the masses, they say you are paranoid.
Are you insane or are you just poisoning the left with your antisemitism?
I agree 💯
Think of the AIPAC espacially Haim Saban
Interesting statement. ;-)
The not so obviously view is telling us sometimes a part of the hidden secrets and hidden truth.
😉✌️
I would have to agree
In the 2nd ww there was a polish officer (intelligence) rotmistrz Pilecki that voluntarily let himsels been arrested to be send to Auschwitz to gather information about how german treated Polish and other prisoners incl Jews there (from the beginning of existance of the camp till when german in 1942 decided to finnaly solve Jewish question overwhelmingly Polish were imprisoned there).
After the war when Poland was under soviets occupation with Jewish police, in-juistice and political system he returned after fighting with british in Italy (he escaped from Auschwitz after one year) and was arrested, tortured and executed by the Jews-comunists that had a power than there.
When his daybooks appeared in Poland a delegation of Hollywood filmmakers visited his family and proposed to film his story changing his ethnicity to Jewish.
The family rejected.
Till tiday no polish filmmaker have a courage to film his live.
After being released from the Nazi camp, he pledged his allegiance to the Polish Government-In-Exile, which to all intents and purposes was a British puppet government with very little public support. They refused to participate in the political process that led to the coalition Provisional Government of National Unity, and were henceforth considered to be agents of a hostile foreign power. Thus he was executed for treason.
„Raport Pileckiego” 2015 actualy there is a movie about his life. I reccomend it to Watch.
Much love and peace from somewhere in Poland
Always a pleasure listen to Tariq. He is very well informed . Thank you
Thrilled to have found this podcast and the interview with Tariq Ali. Concise truth and observations. If only we could send him on a world tour! 🎉
thank you so much to you and to your guest. It was an hour that runs so fast; so much light shed on here. I dont know who will be your next guest but please, keep going.
As somebody who was sacked and then blacklisted from teaching in 1968: because I wouldn't conform to their thinking, what Tariq has said here makes me feel like it's time for me 'to come out of the woodwork'.
The time IS now. When Darryl Cooper starts releasing his series on WW2, public opinion will have to change. You will be proven right as will the others who challenged the accepted narrative.
Tarik ali is great as always
Strictly speaking Sunak is prime minister of the United Kingdom not just England..however,you are forgiven for thinking it is only England..British politics are unusual.
@@mothompson3437 Who cares about this lunatic Radish Sunak
For everyone who thinks he was such s great hero. Here you go.
He trained navy warships.on liverpool with orders to.shoot if they didn return to.work.
Let it sink in
Those who will not hear a bad word said a out him say, what about the war, he saved us? The reality is, we didn’t need saving. He(on behalf of his backers), pushed for war with Germany who did not threaten British interests. After Dunkirk, he refused several peace offers from Hitler and, contrary to what so many believe, it was Churchill who ordered the bombing of German cities(a war crime). It was months before Hitler responded with retaliatory strikes. He really isn’t the hero so many believe him to be.
The dominant community has dominate the educational institution throughout the the world, HAS and WILL continue to crate fable, if you will to hide their wicked traditions. Sadly, other oppressed people have adopted this nonsense as well. There are many semi-solutions: READING, not any types of reading but selective reading, AVOIDING the stupid tube (T.V.).
@he_is_a_GOOBER_dont_disrespect apparently you don't understand that to win a war against evil you need to have STRONG discipline.
@@smt0202 and apparently you don't understand war is a racket.
Churchill was put into.power because he was ruthless fair enough. But only because chamberlain understood.the cost of war.. he had just seen the first World War and wanted to avoid it again at all costs even his reputation and job
So he was replaced with a dog.
I won't be told churchill was some great man.
He was no.better than a dog.
Caused the deaths of 2 million Indians.
I could go on.
You know its 2024 now. I can accept my grandparents thinking they were fighting for something its sad but understandable.
But with the ability to actually read the real accounts and documentation of how much of a racist disgusting man he was. And how the world wars are basically huge money laundering operations
Lick the boots if you want I never will.
I'm working class. Not a fool.
Makes you rethink WW1 and WW2 we were the baddies, the allies have set in motion the shit my generation is dealing with today all started after WW2.
With all different Media, Mobile picture, and live truth on ground but main news, Establishment Media lie to people, then imagine how much lies thry told about everything those days???
Read "Churchill's War" and "Hitler's War" by David Irving
churchill's war volumes 1 and 2;
hitler's war
the war path (prelude to hitler's war)
@freebeerfordworkers interesting comment, not sure who you are referring to. The truth of the Holocaust is not allowed to be discovered!! That’s what we should want to know, why!!!
@freebeerfordworkersSo you’re confident that everything you’ve been told about it is 100% real then?
He used the army daily to kill off as many innocent folks in as many lands as he could as his hero Rhodes and Milner did before . A thief a mass murderer and enabled nearly all the nastiz command to flee to USA via Argentina and Also to the East . He gave up his spy on Gibraltar so they could sail past. His spy in Huttlers office spotted in S America decades after we thought the war was over.
Better still: Churchill's Secret War, by Mukerjee Madhusree.*****
Mind you, Gandhi was also deeply racists…by todays standards, most people were.
Back up your words with evidence. otherwise it's just slander, contemptible slander. Remember, a racist is not a racist due to some spoken words, a racist is someone who's every action reveals the kind of mind behind it.
@@Scoubidou-if1of It’s a well known and documented fact about Gandhis anti-black racism. In 2019, on the 150th anniversary of Gandhi's birth, Manchester students even rejected a 9ft statue of the man along with a demanded for an apology from the council because of Mahatma Gandhi ‘s"well-documented anti-black racism”…You need to do some basic research, before you go accusing others of slander.
@@Scoubidou-if1ofsounds like you're trying to change the definition of "racist" on order to make Ghandi not seem like a racist
@@anthonyferris8912He was during his years in South Africa but he did later change his stance.
Shhhh. You are not supposed to cloud the waters of polemicism. People are here to be outraged, not enlightened.
Wow, Ali's voice makes me melt. Such a pleasure to listen to this man.And the insight as well, obv.
Magnificent interview, briliant intelect, both interviewer and interviewie! Tariq Ali should became world famous. I will endevour to research his work and read his books.
During the debacle at the Darnnells during WWI, Churchill was Lord of the Admiralty, position which he coveted intensely but performed so poorly he was demoted and spent many years during which his carreer was in the doldrums until WWII begun and he was given the Premiership of Britain, for lack of interest in the position, by all other possible candidates. Nobody wanted it, and thus someone in power suggested: "Give it to Winston", ressurrecting his career. By then, he was a heavy drinker, and by the end of the war, he was an alcoholic!!
Great discussion
We need many like you in this crazy, sick world. Amen!
Tariq Ali. One of my political and intellectual heroes. Never dull and always different
At last the truth is out !! Destroy the myth !!
We hardly talk about the Indian Bengal Holocaust committed by the British. Commonly known as the Bengal Famine. 3 Million or more Indians killed.
We have barely scratched the surface of what happened and it's not even covered as much as Jallianwalla Bagh or Amritsar.
Try to remember it was because the Japanese cut off their food supply ❤
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb Try not to lie (fat chance with your kind) and twist the facts too much.
@@thewhatorwhy do you not know what the Japanese did in WW2?
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb Yes, and a lot better than you. I suggest you stop trolling, read some books and try not to be like your ancestors.
Winston Churchill was one of the worst monsters of 20th century. Just incredible how many crimes he committed from Africa to India, from Ireland to Palestine, from WW1 to WW2 and between. Endless manipulation, machinations, betrayal of his own allies and in the end the betrayal of the Empire.
I’ve watched this man since I was a teenager. He’s never, ever in half a century, ever had anything ever good to say about Britain. Apart from a good, safe and comfortable living off this country, what good has he done and why is he here?
Exactly standard Marxist bastard bitching about the country that gave him a home and livelihood
If you had grown in a colonised country you would understand him
If you have watched him since you were a teenager is because you are interested in what he has got to say, are you not?, therefore You and only You should not be a "traitor" to him
Thank you. Good to see Tariq Ali. Always interesting and a learning experience.
Great interview!
*****. A great interview 👍
Thank you Tariq for revealing the other side of this imperialist, stubborn, bully Churchill. I suppose that part of his character was what made him determined to beat the Nazis. So these characteristics came in useful for Britain in his later life.
Don't forget Nazis were defeated by Rusia
@@leoninocat5070 3 out of 5 Nazi’s were killed by Russian soldiers. The Russian people paid the highest price for defeating the Nazi scourge - 26 million Russians killed in WW2
@@leoninocat5070Britain destroyed Germany with bombs and its commie allies moved in at the end of the war.
He didn't beat the Nazis.
THOUGHT THE RED ARMY DEFEATED THE WERMACHT ?
Well done. Balanced and thoughtful. Most importantly, acknowledging the different paradigm of the past. Thank goodness we have moved on.
Great to watch, thanks
Tariq is correct and I admire his intellectual honesty🙏
Brilliant please interview him again about the current Gaza genocide!
Thank you so much for this. I haven't seen Tareq Ali for a long time, and I"ve missed him.
The whole western alliance combined did very little work to defeat the Fascist. The largest impact was by the USSR. The Anglo-Saxons joined the Russians online because of the horrible fear of communism.
The claim that Germany was a threat to France and England was part of Churchills narrative anyway, but far away from the truth. For France and England, Germany was never a threat.
Churchill just proclaimed Germany to be a threat.
Wonderfully clear. Thank you for filling in so many gaps.
The following quote nails it down with regard to the recent war-mongering stance of Western imperialism against people without power and the barbaric, genocidal cultural hegemony that's justifying it:
"Allowances can be made for Mr. Churchill's statement, however unworthy, in the first flush of his victory. No such excuse could be found for me in this quieter atmosphere. There are, however some things which it is my duty to say, some things which it is essential to say. I shall try to say them as dispassionately as I can.
Mr. Churchill makes it clear that, in certain circumstances, he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain's necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean Britain's necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people's rights were not to count.
It is quite true that other great Powers believe in this same code-in their own regard-and have behaved in accordance with it. That is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars-World War No. 1 and World War No. 2-and shall it be World War No. 3?
Surely Mr. Churchill must see that if his contention be admitted in our regard, a like justification can be framed for similar acts of aggression elsewhere and no small nation adjoining a great Power could ever hope to be permitted to go it own way in peace."
(Eamon de Valera's response to victory-drunk imperialist Churchill, May 1945)
Different perspective. Worth listening to. Who amongst us agree with 100% of anyone’s comments.
Spot on about Churchill.
Please Piers Morgan ....have a real Uncensored show with Tari Ali on ! A lot of clicks await
Piers Morgan wont want to watch this ,he,d be offended saying anything negative about Churchill ,even though its true.
Waste of time. Don’t promote Piers’ show
I condemn Piers Morgan.
Please, no more Piers Morgan. We need a new voice that people will listen to.
You are not Scottish.
What a phenomenal guest... May God Bless Brother Tariq for speaking with vigor and truth
Spot on. However, I don't think the US will be able to project militarily like it did. There are cheap asymmetric technologies that could make this impossible
A person who really knows History, can usually tell you something about the future. Case in point here. 👍🏼
The British aren't British, they're Angles and Saxons, they're from Germany, Belgium, Netherlands etc. Real British, the "Ancient Britons" are Scotland, Ireland, Wales and ever since then the Angles and Saxons have been at war with the Ancient Britons, dragging them into its banking wars against other empires.
ah yes, when bad things come to light the brits will say it was the germans. A british classic.
When a German comes around and tells the brits they are our cousins, suddenly you brits dont want to have anything to do with that at all and proclaim that "most traces of anglo-saxon blood are long gone and mixed in with the rest of the british isles".
It's a little more complicated than that. You might want to factor in the Normans, the Vikings, the Danes and I'm just scratching the surface. The populations of Scotland, Ireland and Wales are far from being Ancient Britons and the population of England is far from being Anglo-Saxon. You might want to dig a bit deeper into the complex history.
@@TheBlackfall234 All I am saying is the Britons have suffered the same fate as the Germans tribes and the French tribes and the Russian tribes and any colonial outpost's original inhabitants by a group that holds itself ABOVE ALL OTHERS. The Britons are long gone just like the Italians and many others, both sacrificed to die for those who control them.
@@littlefluffybushbaby7256 Regardless of how uncomplicated I made the statement, I at least made the statement. If I went into details of all the tribal wars the essence of the statement would be lost. The point is the Britons are as much a victim of British rule as anyone. 1845-52 British invasion of Ireland 3-5 million starved, crops and livestock stolen, land stolen, deeds burnt, forged documents put in place and the world was told it was a "potato famine." Plus the soldiers sent to die in wars.
@@truthlifefishing1730 I think when things are boiled down to simple statements it misses out much of the context and facts. It's about persuation, not truth. There is a reason that history books are not one paragraph long. Miss out 99% of the facts and you can prove whatever you want to prove. Much of what you've already said is either wrong, or at best a partial truth.
excellent interview, I am loving the book on Churchill written by Tariq, His Times His Crimes, real eye opener for sure. Especially as I'm also reading Churchills history of WW2 and up to book 4 now!!
Humbled to be able to listen to such a great human being and brilliant mind. I adored the quintet, every single word of them. Now reading with great pleasure Churchill’s bio. Thank you
Thank you Tarig Ali for your historical truths. It is also a pleasure just listening to your calm voice.
Churchill hated the Russians vicariously. At the time he probably believed that Russia was an irreducible enemy of English imperialism. Perhaps he imagined that England had a mission to conquer the inferior, barbarian, uncivilized, communist Slavs who had overthrown the Tsar's monarchy and defeated the White Army and its allies during the civil war. But the truth is that, viewed from a distance, Churchill had a deep reason to hate Russian culture and literature.
“… I also remember that, in my article, I developed the idea that all… say, for example, the legislators and founders of humanity, starting with the oldest and continuing with Lycurgus, Solon, Muhammad, Napoleon, etc. etc., everyone, from the first to the last, had been criminals, if only because, when promulgating new laws, they abolished the old ones, considered sacred by society and ancestors, and certainly would not have stopped before the blood , whenever this (sometimes poured out with all innocence and virtue, in defense of the old laws) could be useful to them. It is also significant that most of these benefactors and founders of humanity were bloodthirsty, especially ferocious. In short: I concluded from this that all individuals, not only the great ones, but also those who moved a little away from vulgarity, that is, also those who are capable of saying something new, would have the obligation, by their very nature , of being infallibly criminal… to a greater or lesser extent, naturally. Otherwise, it would be difficult for them to get out of vulgarity, and they cannot conform to staying there, even for the same reason as their nature and, in my opinion, they even have an obligation not to conform. In short: as you can see, so far, this is nothing particularly new. This has already been printed and read thousands of times. As regards my distinction between ordinary and extraordinary men, I agree that it is somewhat arbitrary; but I didn't quote exact numbers. I only have faith in my essential idea, which is that which consists in saying concretely that individuals are divided, according to the law of nature, into two categories: the inferior (that of the vulgar), that is, if I may say so, the material, which is only useful for the procreation of the species, and that of individuals who have the gift or intelligence to say a new word among themselves. …” (CRIME AND PUNISHMENT, Fyodor Dostoevsky, p. 281
Winston Churchill was an embodiment of the criminal statesman who historically and politically manufactures his own impunity as described and honored by Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov in Dostoevsky's novel Crime and Punishment. He must have seen himself portrayed in the book, didn't like what he saw and buried it deep in his unconscious mind. This wound expressed itself consciously through the contempt and hatred that Churchill felt towards Russia.
Thank you for your comment. This is motivating me to read "Crime and Punishment".
"viscerally" I expect you mean.
@@Nobody-zv5lp Please do; it's the greatest book I've yet to read.
It's easy to feel hate for Russia, to be fair.
@@FiveLiverThe genuine Russia fell to the communists and can never return due to the genocide of original blood lines.
Thank for enlightening us on the untold history that is never taught to the masses.
He is hated in parts of Scotland particularly Dundee.
I've always liked Dundee!
Why thst
That says more about Dundee than it does about Churchill.
Glasgow not keen on him either.
@@FiveLiver It speaks volumes for the Dundonians ability to identify evil when the see it.
Thank you for this presentation which I stumbled across today.. Tariq Ali speaks his truth assuredly and reasonably which is a rarity these days
Thank you for this report. I’ve been waiting for years for someone to report on Churchill’s racist policies. The division of Ireland. The famine in Bengal. And what will be the cause of WW3, the expulsion of the Palestinian people from their homeland and almost a hundred years of brutal persecution.
💯💯💯
It's more to do with the ruling elite and everyone else. The likes of Churchill have no more love for working class white people than they do for working class black people.
There are no Palestinian people - it's a myth shared by the hard left and the Islamists.
With his speech in Foulton, Missoury, soon after the WW2, Churchill was the initiator of the so called "cold war" and it was his horrible legacy.
Amazing interview 👏
Thanks. I like when you make videos instead of tl;dr posts...
Looking forward to reading this. Clive Ponting's biography is hard to beat!
This should be essential viewing in order to try and change and educate our population as to our true crimes and history.
This is propaganda. You are not responsible for crimes that others did❤
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb The purpose of learning history is to not repeat the crimes of the past. Even here in Canada, we pay lip service to our less than stellar past, while continuing to do the same things to our indigenous population.
@@erikhai1 the purpose of history is to know the good the bad and the mundane. You are not responsible for anything you didn't do good or bad. Everyone born in Canada is indigenous to it. Support liberty and justice for all and everyone will be better off ♥️
Thank you for this interview. Always a delight to hear Tarik offer his insights and we don't often get to hear and see him.
El Cid was a Moor and few people know this! The beautiful mingling and collaboration between the cultures of old Spain were a high point of our humanity.
A wonderfully enlightening interview.Much respect to you both.Thank you.🙏
It is good this Pakistani man is allowed to criticise the West, while living in the West.
However, he would never be allowed to criticise the Ottoman empire, while living in Turkey.
The Ottoman Turks murdered a million Armenians in 1915.
The Turk's starved a million Lebanese in 1918.
Criticising Turkey's past carries the penalty of insulting Turkishness.
They've been in charge for 70 years. Still a craphole.
It’s not criticism, it’s called discussing history - your butwed
"Yanks should stay home".
🎉 22:33
Excellent discussion gentlemen, thank you ❤
Brave AI w/Leo
The Moors, who were African Muslim people from North Africa, made significant contributions to Europe's development in the areas of crops, irrigation systems, and agricultural techniques during their 700-year occupation of Spain. Some of the key contributions include:
1. New crops: The Moors introduced new crops such as rice, citrus fruits, and cotton to Europe, which helped to diversify the European diet and improve food security.
2. Irrigation systems: The Moors developed advanced irrigation systems, such as the qanat system, which allowed for the cultivation of crops in areas with limited rainfall. This technology was later adopted by European farmers and helped to increase crop yields.
3. Agricultural techniques: The Moors introduced new agricultural techniques, such as crop rotation and the use of fertilizers, which helped to improve soil fertility and increase crop yields. They also developed advanced methods of grape cultivation, which led to the development of high-quality wines in regions such as Rioja.
These contributions helped to transform the agricultural landscape of Europe and played a significant role in the development of the continent's economy and culture.
What a wonderful insightful interview. Thank you .
Tariq has to update his knowledge of China's tech prowess. They not only produce. 5 millimeter chips, they are building their own chipmaking equipment so as to stop relying on the Norway for these machines. China is probably the only country that is vertically and horizontally industrially integrated.
I thought it was Holland that manufactured these machines.
You mean 5 _nano metre_ chips? And it's the Netherlands - not Norway. The 'nm' labels are more of a naming convention than a reference to dimensions and are largely a marketing term. It will take 10 yrs or longer for would-be chip fabricators to establish the technology and expertise of the dutch foundries - everyone would be doing it if it were easy. This is one reason why Taiwan has such importance. Chip design is the corresponding technology to fabrication, and Israel is dominant in this area - Intel chips have been designed there for years. Those 'trusted platform modules' were not put there for _our_ benefit.
I just bought this book and it is brilliant. It's not just Churchill but an amazing historical perspective with Churchill in it. On of the best if not the best political history books I've ever read.
Churchills mother was jewish, and his dead father owed money to the jews. Noone is asking where he could have gotten the money to have a large estate with gardeners, servents etc, on his ordinary politicians salery. England, France and America! Who is ruling?
The jolly heretic wrote a book: churchills head master and explored churchills life.
E Michael Jones has spoken and written about Churchill and his ills many times.
1. He was an aristoctrat. 2. He was an author. 3. He wasn't always in a good financial position. At least do a little bit of reading up before you pour out your antisemitism.
@@littlefluffybushbaby7256 that victim card is no longer valid
I don’t think it’s true that his mother was Jewish. What is your information source?
@@YogaladyToronto Churchill Father is known to have taken a huge amount of money to lobby for the establishment of the terrorist Supremacist occupation in Palestine.
Wow. This fellow speaks English like it’s a crime against humanity.
This needs to be brought out so all can recognize the Truth
Churchill's war narrative still has a heavy imprint on the way many people see WW2, its origins and its history (also because it fed into the Hollywood narratives of the war). He still has that privilege to a much larger degree than let's say general de Gaulle, who also wrote some very interesting war memoirs and who was a formative political figure into the 1960s. The myth that almost nobody in British politics but Churchill and his friends really saw the threat of Hitler is very much part of his own narrative: he didn't want to recognize that people within the Labour party had also been warning against the Nazis, or that the French socialist government in 1936-37 had also tried to mobilize Europe against Berlin.
Churchill must have understood, around the end of WW2, that even though Hitler had been defeated. the war had also dealt a mortal blow to the British Empire itself. Both Roosevelt and Stalin had told him during the conferences of the war (Tehran, for example) that they were not sending millions of their own young men into the fight to hand back the empire to Britain on a silver platter. Once the war is over, they told him, you Brits will have to start dismantling your own empire. And he knew that the Japanese had also shown to people all over Asia that the whites where by no means unbeatable. He needed the support of both the US and the Soviet Union, so he had to accept the "orders" to prepare for giving up on much of the empire. As he was voted out in 1945, he didn't have to do the job personally, but the liberation of India was a pretty much inevitable step, and without the possession of British India, much of the rest of the empire was rather pointless and would not carry its own costs in a meaningful way. Churchill knew that the war had finished the British Empire in its classic sense, but he didn't want that to be part of the story of the war, so he kept this out of his own history/war memoirs (first volume in 1948). Of course his accounts of British diplomacy during the war were highly edited too and adapted to the story he wanted.
That Germany was a threat to britain, wich you seem to still believe according to the first part of your comment, is ironically enough.... just part of Churchills Narrative.
The truth is, that Germany was never a threat to neither France nor England. So any narrative evolving around the "german threat" from British or French Perspective, is nothing but propaganda. England and France were never threatened. Thats just part of the Narrative to make it look like Churchill wanted a War that was necessary. The Sad Reality is, that Churchill wanted a War that was unnecessary.
So Churchills Narrative really isnt "We saw Hitler as a threat before anyone else".
Churchills Narrative is "Hitler is a threat to us"
while he never really was.
Great interview
An excellent documentary, well balanced and such a relief to hear such a thoughtful reasoning mind. Until we hear the 'other' side of the story we will only ever know half the facts.
Churchill believed in white supramacy
Churchill was a Zionist.
Amazing thinker delightful interview.
Churchill was a great racist. I own a Churchill book from early, early 1900's, 1904? And he is most definitely a racist. A lot of Brits get mad at me when I suggest that Churchill IS a racist. But, it is true.
Maybe they get upset because you say he "is" a racist and they are pretty sure he's dead.
As a Brit, this bloke has benefitted considerably from what he considers to be his country's wrong doings. He also seems to spend a lot of his time in a country he despises and continues to benefit from his country's tolerance of his views. Perhaps he should consider donating a substantial part of his personal fortune to the peoples that his country, in his view, has exploited!
Truth is freedom