Paul McCartney and Linda McCartney Interview Good Morning America November 1980
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 гру 2020
- November 27, 1980
Good Morning America
Satellite Interview Paul and Linda McCartney
Hog Hill Mill Studio, Sussex, England
My hope for this channel is to bring entertaining and educational content
about The Beatles through interviews, raw footage and more.
Please help me to continue to build my channel by subscribing and hitting the like button.
#ItsAllBeatles - Розваги
1980 wasn't ready for the "your wife" joke.
"do you think you're cute"
"nope"
"are you eating turkey"
"nope"
"did you write yesterday for linda"
"nope"
what an amazing interview
REST IN PEACE AND PEACE & LOVE TO LINDA McCARTNEY!!!!!☮️❤️
Good times!
somewhere in england- the george album one year later!
Rude questions. You can tell Paul and Linda are a little irritated.
Paul often says that hr and John resolved their differences before John's murder but this is just a few days before that so I have my doubts..:/
I don't know. He didn't say anything bad about John. I'd say that they were getting along.
This was 11 days before John died.
REST IN PEACE AND PEACE & LOVE TO JOHN LENNON!!!!!!!!!☮️❤️
@@redlightflash9315 Good job typing
8:29 Paul gives David Hartman the finger
paul is always good at interviews. So is linda.The interviewers are rarely so...
THis is the kind of interview that sucks... such stupid questions... Paul and Linda make it through this stupid stuff.
Absolutely
What is wrong with Linda in this interview? I don't recall her acting like this in previous interviews except for the one with Tom Snyder. Is she high?
probably....they both liked their pot! :)
5:02 savage Paul moment
Paul was very rude. And, behaved childish. Not a good interview at all.
Well, they called him cute and laughed at him, and the questions were stupid, so..
@@asgo7320 So, calling someone "cute" justifies rudeness? The questions were stupid, and, Paul and Linda acted stupid. As I said, the entire interview was terrible.
@@lisas3545 oh, ok then. Yes sir! if you say so...or madam. But İ do not think paul was rude. The interviewer was very odd and was trying to be funny.
I bet John watched this..somewhere in England
.george title...why didn't they ask him about John's comeback
I wondered that too because Double Fantasy had just been released on November 17th, 1980.
Linda looks after the children. Not both of you?
1:25 Cute? The Cute Beatle?
Paul's prosthetic right eye gets out of synchronisation in this video.
okay riddle me this then, genius:
If Paul died in 1966 and Faul who was only a mere lookalike and so according to most of these juvenile theories had to get surgery to look even more like Paul
--***how come his son James who was born in 1977 when James was a young man is the spitting image of Paul in 1963.****
***The exact same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows, and chin.****
****And when James gets older is the spitting image of Paul's brother Michael. An actual doppelganger of Mike now.****
If one answers because they took the sperm of a young man in his early 20s, which they would have taken in the 60s, a decade before the boom of this practice in the 70s (1700s, but frozen sperm only since the 50s) and then waited 11 years to inseminate or answer he doesn't look just like them it just proves to me how weak and thin these theories actually are.
====
Oh and here Paul still has his lip scar in 1968 (in John and Paul's last interview) from that famous December 26th 1965 moped crash photo of his badly cut lip (not the 1966 fantasy car crash where he supposedly died). You still see it to this day.
ua-cam.com/video/TAtvlIm-s-E/v-deo.htmlsi=Iff9Ojzem02a8Ykn
At three minutes and Fifty Seven seconds in.
=====
***Also things like seeing Michael and Paul going off to dinner together in Get Back, not even knowing they are in the shot.***
****And Paul's penchant for what Lennon called Granny music became even more prominent at times in the 70s which wss a direct extension of his growing up with his father's music hall influences. And him recording his father's song that his father told him he wrote and then Paul surprised him with.*****
****His father in the pictures at Paul and Linda's small private and intimate 1969 wedding, etc ****
=====
And George has explained a thousand times that his first trip to India with Patti in 1966 changed him forever. And that the Beatles had no meaning to him after that with his new egoless spirituality.
And those channels for the moronic sheep who eat up anything given to them take that out of context on purpose. Just like when they use normal forced perspective photography illusions as proof that Faul is taller or they try to pass off Paul's IEM's as prosthetic ears And then the followers think we are the moronic unthinking sheep. Lol.
They should take a photography course sometime. Forced Perspective Illuision in photography is when someone is standing beside someone else but slightly ahead of the other making the illusion that one person is taller than the other. Almost all group pictures have this illusion.
It's time for the Faulers to move beyond a 60s teenage fantasy that was born on college campuses in 1965 but mostly birthed from a satirical article about it and then a joke call in (by the same person who wrote it) to a radio show about it. Then exploited by an opportunistic record company and spurred on by the dry wit of the Beatles and their wives.
Do they really think they are that stupid to call him Billy evey chance they got in front a camera?
If you reply TLDR I'll leave you to it and give you my bored yawn now.😂
Just think the following month Lennon death comes
Man, I remember this David Hartman guy and this interview but i don't remember him being such a POS.
Everything out of his mouth is just trying to make them feel uncomfortable. Lol
This is such a sad and interesting interview because John dies soon after. And I remember this guy - I don't remember his name but he was a terrible interviewer always. I don't know why he was on TV. Linda is a bit annoying in these interviews - especially when American Linda tries to pretend to be British by mocking an American accent. I get that it would have been annoying to answer his stupid questions but no need to stoop to his level.
Americans mock American accents all the time.
Yoko was the best Beatle, but Linda was the best Beatle wife.
yoko wasn't even the best artist in the Beatles lol.
Please in Spanish.
Go to El YouTubo.
por favor
Cute Beatle? Yes, James Paul McCartney WAS cute. This guy? No. Not cute and not Paul. When will people open their eyes and see this is not the same person.
I wish it wasn't true and went through a LONG time refusing to believe Paul was replaced but now know it's absolutely true. Do your research.
Considering all his best music was written after 67, this Paul wipes the floor with the first loser
@@adolescentwombat Jesus Christ, did you really write all that thinking you were dunking on me? I was mocking the OP’s belief that Paul actually died. Don’t bother going into long winded debunks with idiots who believe this. They only deserve to be laughed at and mocked. DO NOT give them the satisfaction of taking them seriously. Lesson for next time.
@@dane21dc lol. I sent it to the wrong guy. My bad.
I'm sick of their nonsense though and smearing his legacy. You think they are bad now. Wait until Paul passes.
But you can do it but I can't. 😀
okay riddle me this then, genius:
If Paul died in 1966 and Faul who was only a mere lookalike and so according to most of these juvenile theories had to get surgery to look even more like Paul
--***how come his son James who was born in 1977 when James was a young man is the spitting image of Paul in 1963.****
***The exact same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows, and chin.****
****And when James gets older is the spitting image of Paul's brother Michael. An actual doppelganger of Mike now.****
If one answers because they took the sperm of a young man in his early 20s, which they would have taken in the 60s, a decade before the boom of this practice in the 70s (1700s, but frozen sperm only since the 50s) and then waited 11 years to inseminate or answer he doesn't look just like them it just proves to me how weak and thin these theories actually are.
====
Oh and here Paul still has his lip scar in 1968 (in John and Paul's last interview) from that famous ****December 26th 1965 moped crash**** photo of his badly cut lip (not the 1966 fantasy car crash where he supposedly died). You still see it to this day.
ua-cam.com/video/TAtvlIm-s-E/v-deo.htmlsi=Iff9Ojzem02a8Ykn
At three minutes and Fifty Seven seconds in.
=====
***Also things like seeing Michael and Paul going off to dinner together in Get Back, not even knowing they are in the shot.***
****And Paul's penchant for what Lennon called Granny music became even more prominent at times in the 70s which wss a direct extension of his growing up with his father's music hall influences. And him recording his father's song that his father told him he wrote and then Paul surprised him with.*****
****His father in the pictures at Paul and Linda's small private and intimate 1969 wedding, etc ****
=====
And George has explained a thousand times that his first trip to India with Patti in 1966 changed him forever. And that the Beatles had no meaning to him after that with his new egoless spirituality.
And those channels for the moronic sheep who eat up anything given to them take that out of context on purpose. Just like when they use normal forced perspective photography illusions as proof that Faul is taller or they try to pass off Paul's IEM's as prosthetic ears And then the followers think we are the moronic unthinking sheep. Lol.
They should take a photography course sometime. Forced Perspective Illuision in photography is when someone is standing beside someone else but slightly ahead of the other making the illusion that one person is taller than the other. Almost all group pictures have this illusion.
It's time for the Faulers to move beyond a 60s teenage fantasy that was born on college campuses in 1965 but mostly birthed from a satirical article about it and then a joke call in (by the same person who wrote it) to a radio show about it. Then exploited by an opportunistic record company and spurred on by the dry wit of the Beatles and their wives.
Do they really think they are that stupid to call him Billy evey chance they got in front a camera?
If you reply TLDR I'll leave you to it and give you my bored yawn now.😂
go take your meds dude.