In the video, I said the X-T3 is $500 less than the X-Pro3 because the X-T3's price was $1299 on the day I made this video. It seems like it's back up to $1499.
@@GrayGhostDog1 Future announcements... X-t3 successor with IBIS (no official name yet) x100v, x-t200 will be launched next month and ready to ship in March.
@@alozor13 ... okay. I thought Fujifilm confirmed a solid date for the future announcement. I'm well aware of the upcoming cameras, which the X-T3 successor is of interest to me... already have an X-T3... have an X-Pro3 now, too, but that's not going anywhere! I could see trading-in the X-T3 if the successor has some compelling features(other than it coming with "working" IBIS I'm hoping for improved EVF, at least LCD resolution update from X-Pro3, and shutter release improvement from either X-H1 or X-Pro3... it wouldn't hurt if they did titanium/Duratec as an option, but I'm afraid most would complain about its asking price).
I flip down the screen and often use it like an old box camera. The camera itself I love because it reminds me of a Leica with no frills, big logos etc. It’s a pleasure to use in the street.
I don't get why so many people even compare it to the X-T3 spec-wise and ask what it's point is, as you said the point/main feature is the optical viewfinder and a different shooting experience, and nobody should have a problem deciding between the two. I love the concept, but learned from my x100 that I don't actually ever use the optical viewfinder, so I know the X-Pro won't ever be my camera but I still like it a lot. About the screen, I also like the concept and if this was the only difference it wouldn't keep me from buying - actually I'd love to see it on an X-E body. Apart from the chimping, I'm often in situations where no back screen can be a plus, like small concerts etc. where I usually disable the back screen anyway to be more stealthy. Also, my Fujis are already often mistaken for film cameras by the security, no back screen would help me even more to get my camera into a concert without a photo pass. :)
This is an interesting take on the X-Pro3 Hyun. As a point of correction, this camera is not a rangefinder. It only simulates a rangefinder with its OVF functionality. The only company making digital or mirrorless rangefinders is Leica. I have no particular interest in this camera. If I want Classic Negative, I can create a recipe on my camera to emulate it and it will work with raw output. My X-E3 does everything I need it to do as a street and travel camera. This camera is for those who one can afford it and want the latest and greatest Fujifilm has to offer in its X-Pro line. But when I think about the petty complaints I hear and read about this or any camera from any manufacturer my default response is, this camera is not for you. Simply don't buy it and move along. Photography has never been about the camera, it has always been about one's eye and ability to compose a shot to make great photographs. The camera and your lenses are nothing more than tools. Yes, we all want better tools but my question is, did you master using the one you have? In most cases, the answer is no. It seems to be en vogue to complain about everything these days. Maybe it's a generational thing but in my view, the X-Pro1 is still a perfectly good camera. So is the X-Pro2, X-H1, X-T2, X-E1, X-E2, and X-E2s. I see people making beautiful photos every day with these older cameras. If you want to become a better photographer, shoot every day as often as you can and review your work, critique your work, allow others to critique it as well. That's the only way to get better at what you do. If you think the tool is going to make you better, you're wrong and should take up another hobby or profession. To everyone reading this, I've shot Canon full-frame and APS-C as well as Panasonic LUMIX M43 professionally and eventually moved over to Fujifilm. Why you might ask because something about the design of their cameras makes me want to shoot both as my hobby and professional. I say use the camera that suits your style of shooting, perfect your craft and make great art. That's all that's needed of us as photographers.
The back screen opened opened give a very clear bright view, and comes into its own for waist level shots. Had it now for over a year and it has become my favourite.
I recently got the x pro 3. I have been shooting with the original x100 since it came out years ago. I went with the x pro 3 over the v because I wanted a new experience. If I got the v i feel like it would have been the same as the x100 but "better". The 3 re energized the excitement of on the go photography for me.
to me, this is the ultimate blend of work and lifestyle camera. It forces you to focus on taking pictures, where we've gotten used to just the process, but not experiencing what we're doing. On my dslr I used the top lcd display solely with my rear screen turned off and just getting used to knowing what settings work with the current lighting I'm in. Switching to a mirrorless I lost that top lcd display and were in need of some kind of screen to remember my settings, and slowly I got more and more used to chimping on the rear screen. I'll be getting this camera because I sense that it's one of those cameras that make you interested in photography again and not just tech.
I borrowed and shot this camera for a day from Fuji's House of Photography London and I like it. My back ground was originally film and I've recently had my Leica M3 serviced and using it again. I've owned since the 80's when I was a professional re-toucher in London, the studio used Nikon SLR and Hasselblad, which where modern! so for personal use I bought the retro M3 (I would say it was more old fashioned then, than it is now thanks to scanning), I also had the M8, terrible screen and a Lumix G1 with the screen turned it for 3 years before I remembered it was there.. I am, you may of guessed not a chipper, to the point that I should do it more. I mis-set the minimum shutter speed flash sync on a X100S (it cycles full round the values whereas the on the M8 it stopped top or bottom, so I'd moved it past the fastest sync and ended up on the lowest at a wedding and when i got home the backgrounds where double shadowed and blurred. Anyhow, for me photography is a hobby now and whatever camera you have, once you add up the lenses, filters, bag etc it costs a lot of money. I have a tone of cheap stuff, house hold goods, vacuum cleaners, kids toys etc made in China. I have very little stuff made elsewhere, so it's also nice to have a Made in Japan camera, Made in Switzerland watch, Made in Germany car. Made in France Saxophone for the luxury things that I tend to keep for a long time. (watch 35 years, car 19, Saxophone 25). Is there a difference in quality, well there can be but not guaranteed. Does it perform better? in Fuji's case No.This camera performs exceptionally well and has a lot of personality, if it meets your photographic needs and you can afford it, it is something that you will take out and hold for no reason whatsoever. I'm probably the market their after. Its a shame the little pop up EVF window in the OVF used for showing focus point, exposure etc doesn't do the quick 0.5 sec review. I'm sure it could. Have you used that feature, it's good for manual focus. Finally as a PS, you have a great, honest and welcoming style. Well done.
That's so interesting they offer different options like that for the screens; I don't have much knowledge about Fujifilm cameras, but they seem to be contributing to the market in their own ways and staying competitive. I probably wouldn't spend the extra money for my needs
It's not always true though that you see "the image" just when you took it. Mostly what you see is going to be that image, but some components can change. For example if you stop down a lens to say f8, they camera will still use the widest available aperture for focusing and metering, so what you see in the evf is lots of bokeh, and on the final shot, that aspect will be different. Had a day when i thought i was taking some images with shallow dof, only to realise i had accidentally set the aperture and there was no bokeh on the images XD
I hope they replace that small rear screen with an ISO dial. Much better use of the space at the back. Or remove it entirely and allow the screen to flip down and articulate. That would solve a lot of the problems.
I think that's kind of crazy to think that amateurs shots through the back screen and professionals from the view finder. We are humans and we all have our preferences. I personally use the view finder but it's probably cause im blind and it helps me see better. Unless I'm taking a low or high shot then I use the back screen.
I hear you about the dial and the on/off button. When I got the mark 6d ii, the dial drove me crazy but now that I got accustomed, I actually appreciate the lock it has.
For a camera intended for street shooters and film nerds, alot of people like to forget that shooting waist level is incredibly common in those two demographics. Its less conspicuous and is super easy to do on the xpro3. Also any articulation is better than the static screen of the xe3 and xpro2. Amusingly enough, nobody complains about static screens, and those are by far more of a sin. The xpro3 is 100% going to be a cult camera as its one a kind, not all cameras need to be designed the same. Once i have the funds im super excited to buy an xpro3
No one talks about the downgraded OVF on the X-pro3. The X-pro2 has 2 switchable magnification which is not talked about in reviews. This is very handy when you switch to longer focal lengths. The X-pro3 has 1 magnification.
Just checked out the XPro 3 Dura Black. Wow, they show fingerprints immediately. I like the way it feels in the hand better than my XT2. However, I think I like the EVF on the XT2 more. It's just larger and I need all the visual help I can get. Plus the LCD viewing area on the Pro 3 is actually smaller. They all have pluses and minuses. Another great Fujifilm camera!
I think you should research the camera before you buy it or i’ll rent one if possible.No one is forcing anyone to buy a particular product or shoot/use one unless you work for a company that furnace you with a particular model.
. I just Can wrap my head around that the XT3 is a way superior camera in ever way. People justify it by saying that this a street photography camera but any camera can accomplish that including the XT3. I don’t get that tiny screen in the back. I feel about it like I feel about the EOS R Touch Bar. At least they should’ve allowed that tiny screen to at least to show your composition (even though is tiny). The price is another thing that I cant understand.
I got an XT3 it's a working horse however not very fun to use for a fuji camera. Despite the huge specs It's not what i want to carry everywhere... I much prefer x100f or xpro lineup or even the tiny nearly pocketable xt30 to get inspired
Cameras nowadays have more or less (not so distant) or similar imaging capabilities. Fujifilm has good or better imaging features. I'm a Nikon guy and owns a used Sony A6300 with only a 20mm 2.8 pancake attached to it. It's my go-getter camera before I set up my Nikons during photo shoots. I like the sturdy, sleek and minimalist design of Sony a6xxx cameras - specially the clean top plate with no protruding viewfinder on top. I'm scouting for a used a6600 with a good second-hand price. I just learned it has no built-in camera and the top plate is now firmer and cleaner.
As a video maker Fuji has never really registered as an option. After this review it remains not something we'd go to as an option 😂 but appreciate all the in depth information seems more like a photographer's line.
I just bought the Xpro 3. I have Leica Q2 and SL2S plus Fuji XT4. This is an amazing camera which I love. Great for street shooting when I dint want the 47MP of the Q2. can also take this fortravel and not worry lenses ar small and using manual focus peaking is amazing on this camera. Grteat review by the way enjoyed your perspective.
I don't think we would pay $200 just to have a different color camera. But of course, that's just us, if they have it is because they have a market for it
Hi Hyun. I'm seriously thinking of buying this camera. I currently own the X-T3 and feel this would make a great second body as I really like the form factor of the rangefinder style. Your review was most informative and has pushed me closer to taking the plunge. Thank you. Cheers Z
@@PissTakeProduction If you're doing fast street work I'd say the AF and larger viewfinder on the X-Pro3 is worth the money, but if you're doing slower, more portrait based work then the X-Pro2 is a steal.
... pretty much what I did. It wasn't really that hard of a decision for me since I always contemplated getting an X-Pro camera after the first generation. Now it's the camera I grab for on a daily basis.
Zsolt Hary - I received mine two weeks ago and I really do like it. For street, the fastest release comes with the camera in manual focus, but that's true of most cameras, and focus peaking makes manual focus a breeze. What has worked best for me during the day has been manual focus, F8 as a starting point, 1/250 or higher, and Auto ISO set for 160-1600.
What Fuji tried to do here with the X-Pro3 is to make a camera similar to those Leica digital M cameras without the (ANY!) screen, but give you screens if you really want them at the same time. A win-win combination in my opinion. Would I buy one? Not likely, course I'll put my hard earned cash elsewhere... into lenses.
Fujifilm really upped their camera game and we like it, although the screen is a bit odd but you’re it’s fun to look at and give a satisfying feeling 😆
I wrote you once and you responded very, very quick, so thanks for that :) Right now, I am looking at the Fuji X-Pro3 or the Fuji X-T3, now the biggest differenc from my noob point of view is the Prize - here the Fuji X-Pro3 costs about 700 Euros more - and of course the fact that the X-Pro3 does not care for videos, which I like very much, since I do not either. Still I am confused as hell.
Haha you must be lucky because unfortunately UA-cam doesn't notify me every comment but yours was the first one on the list today. You're right about the price of the X-Pro3, it is a bit confusing. I believe most of the additional cost goes to the hybrid viewfinder. I hear they're very expensive to make. And the rest for the slightly better build quality. If you care about video, the X-T3 is the much better option.
@@HyunRalphJeong Thanks. I'll then get the X-T3. I don't care about video, but since the photo capability seems to be rather equal, I don't mind not having a viewfinder. It's gonna be my first fuji, with the rest of the money I can then buy a good lense. Thank you again.
Thank you for a very honest & informative video - really enjoyed it. I am an enthusiast who shoots family events, travel & street ( do intention of making money through photography), 90% of which is stills. Would you kindly answer these questions 1) I know the file size of the Sony in crop mode is approximately 10.4 Mb - will this produce 8.5x11 prints with enough resolution to still be pleasing to the eye 2) does the Fuji have a similar in camera feature? Thank you in advance for your answer. Morrie
Happy 2020! The durability is a good selling point. Our camera has a few battle scars for sure. Haha Love the flip screen. That comparison with Mercedes is on point. We don't mind the design of the screen because it feels like it's protected. Nice comparison of the manual transmission too. Haha
Someone made a comment that Fuji try to tell a person how to shoot. I disagree with that. I think that Fuji put the emphasis on how the buying public can make best use of theirs product too theirs primary audience. Cameras in a way is just like buying a car. If you want a Certain make of car, it’s is there for you,if you want to pay the price. Everyone does not want or need a Mercedes been or Corvette to take the children to school when a Volkswagen will do the same thing. People complain about the cost of a camera, lens, and even batteries. I’m surprise and maybe I’m not,that there are so many people that would buy a product and not be aware of it limitations.
Man if all your dials get changed from your bag, maybe you should get another bag... I own both the xt-3 and the x-pro3 and this has never happened to me once...
Fuji rumors say XT-4 is imminent so why bother with this one. even if you are on a budget i would wait for xt-4 to come out and look for a deal on xt-3.
There's always a new camera imminent though. :) I think with the X-Pro line it's all down to the body, not the specs. I have both the Pro-3 and the X-T3 and I just prefer the X-Pro3's body. It fits really nice in the hand and it feels like it has such a low profile. I love the viewfinder too. The X-T3 is slightly more practical with its excellent battery grip and great for video, but I'm a stills shooter and the X-Pro3 can let you see more of the scene as you shoot owing to its range-finder style viewfinder. To be honest, now we've hit a certain tech level in cameras it's becoming less about the innards (nearly all cameras are capable of taking great photos) and more about ergonomics. Therefore even if the X-T4 outmatches the X-Pro3 from a specs standpoint, the X-Pro3 might still be the one to get for some people. From a price point the X-T3 is definitely the smarter option, and for those who don't care about an OVF or the range-finder experience I say definitely get that one instead, but the X-Pro3 definitely has a place.
I guess because this camera is for a completely different audience. There's no point in comparing their specs, X-Pro3 is for people who like that concept, X-T3 is for those who don't and they're not made to compete with each other. If you're not into the optical viewfinder, there's no point in considering the X-Pro3 - that's still it's main feature and what makes it so much more expensive.
I do wonder about the finish choices on the XPro-3 in reference to re-sale. I guess time will tell if second hand buyers value the scratch resistance. I did go for the Dura Black and don't mind the finger prints.Heck, it look kind of like the camera has camp on it ;) A few wipes with a Zeiss lens cleaner wipe pretty much takes care of the grunge. I just do that when it really gets bad.
@@HyunRalphJeong I've got the Dura-Black, here's a Pro-Tip (Ha! A pun!) if you completely smudge up the camera with your thumbprints it stops looking dirty and gets a real nice even matte gun-metal style look to it that's actually pretty sweet. My advice is to give it a courtesy clean once every couple of weeks and if you ever sell it on, and to otherwise enjoy the darker, Mamiya 6 kind of shade you get with a good smudging up.
@@motasmomar2674 F2.8 as you would get more light in esp for weddings. But i found Canon really has dated with their EF range. I moved to Fujifilm. Sold the Canon 5DIII with 24-105mm F4. They are just long in the tooth spec wise.
LOL I agree, you don't buy a mercedes or bmw because it's the smart thing to do, you really gotta want it! It definitely is the same with cameras! The flip screen for $500 is a little steep though..
I’m a portrait and headshot photographer and I use the XT3 and X100V. I was thinking about adding the XT4, but now I’m seriously considering an XPRO3 after falling for the X100. May I ask, do you think the XPRO3 is up to the task for paid portrait work (studio and natural light). I also sometimes photograph families and occasional live performances. Mostly paid portraits. Do you think that the XPRO3 could handle all of that?
...I love my PRO3 (and my old PRO1... and my 100...and my GFX S...) If I was a pro, it would be a pain to have to work with tools you hate...12+ hours a day... I am just an amateur...but I need a camera I like to enjoy my hobby...I need a camera I feel comfortable with...that produces files I like (I do not say "the best camera or the best files...") I have an old Canon EOS 1D mark1 that I hate (both the camera and the files)...but I recognise it's a excellent camera... just not for me!
@@sherwinh1661 I love my Fuji files! I never had the Pro 2 If money is a major issue, perhaps the II should be considered... I jumped from the 1 to the 3 and I just love it. My major problem with the Pro 1 is the lack of diopter correction...
Good review, but every review on this camera misses one big feature of the flip screen...it gives you a waist-level viewfinder (like an old school Hasselblad medium format) for stealth shots. This is a purpose-driven design...a street photographer's camera!
Thank you! I didn't think waist level shooting was something that needed to be explained since most cameras can do that nowadays but yes, it is very useful in that regard.
Hyun Ralph Jeong Yeah, most cameras do allow for that, but the simple “flip down” design is faster and easier than it is to get the same view on an XT-3. Either way, it’s a quirky camera but I love it! Fuji really makes me want to go out and take photos all the time!
Buying a Mercedes is not the smartest thing to do... Only if you're trying to buy a car and you're on a budget. Xpro3 is more like a Chrysler 300... A good car that kinda looks like a RR phantom, if you squint your eyes a bit...
Cameras don't usually annoy me and I don't even have any interest in Fuji being a m4/3 shooter but that camera just bugs me because Fuji designed it telling you how to shoot.
Mr Tech well being a G9 shooter I like to have all my settings easily visible on screen at all times. And correct anything overhead is out of the question. Just a annoying camera.
@Paul Jones: They lost you as a customer, but gained me as one. The fact that Fuji think differently is what has recently drawn me to their brand. I don't see their approach as arrogant or limiting. It feels like they are inviting the user to take photographs in a slower, more considered way. Plus, they make other designs with near-identical the specs for those who want a general purpose camera. They give us choice. I am interested to know how well the X-Pro3 is selling. I waited several months for a second-hand one but none became available in my area. So either they are selling very badly or people are buying them, liking them and keeping them. I had to cough up for a new one, but due to virus lockdown I have not yet put it properly to the test. I can't wait to break free...
@Paul Jones You make some valid points, many of which I agree with; especially the remarkable lack of innovation in today's cameras. But I prefer not to dwell on these issues. My hobby/passion is primarily photography (not cameras). I will go out and buy the cameras and lenses that are closest to being the ones that a) I enjoy using, b) deliver the image quality I need and c) I can afford. My perfect camera will never exist. I just learn to live with whatever I end up buying and everything else is about creating images.
Subscriber here, love your vids etc. But have to say that your classic negative explanation is way off. For anyone wondering please look up how Fuji develops these.
astudios Ah, thank you. I actually learned a lot from looking it up. I think the more accurate description would have been “lower saturation with higher contrast.”
Great review. Since this is a "pro" camera, I wish they offered options for the LCD screen to meet the needs of different photography styles. My choice would be a screen similar to what's on the x100v.
I have yet to see a review of the XPro3 where the person doing the review "gets it." This one is certainly no different. I own one and love it but this camera isn't for everyone. Well, maybe it is, cause at the time of typing this you cannot buy an all-black XPro3 anywhere in North America. If you don't like the OVF, sub-display, fiddly exposure comp dial and hidden LCD then fuck off, the XPro3 is not for you. Go back to Sony. BTW who relies on raw files when shooting Fuji X series cameras? The jpegs are delicious, learn how to shoot the jpegs. Fuji didn't invest millions into film simulations so you could process raw files in LR lol. Go back to Sony if you wanna shoot raw. Dayum.
I love Fuji mirrorless products and have the XPRO2, but I dont like the concept of the XPRO3 screen. I think the movable screen position is a hazard and can be damaged. The film screen is a gimmick. If the main screen would fold flat and show images, that might work. Strangely, nearly every reviewer has no issues with this model. In some ways Im glad it has the "flaw." Now I wont make an impulsive decision to upgrade my XPRO2.
In the video, I said the X-T3 is $500 less than the X-Pro3 because the X-T3's price was $1299 on the day I made this video. It seems like it's back up to $1499.
With the new fuji announcement, people are already getting rid of their xt3 and you can easily find them in 9/10 condition for under $1k...
@@alozor13 ... Fujifilm had an announcement?
@@GrayGhostDog1 Future announcements... X-t3 successor with IBIS (no official name yet) x100v, x-t200 will be launched next month and ready to ship in March.
@@alozor13 ... okay. I thought Fujifilm confirmed a solid date for the future announcement. I'm well aware of the upcoming cameras, which the X-T3 successor is of interest to me... already have an X-T3... have an X-Pro3 now, too, but that's not going anywhere! I could see trading-in the X-T3 if the successor has some compelling features(other than it coming with "working" IBIS I'm hoping for improved EVF, at least LCD resolution update from X-Pro3, and shutter release improvement from either X-H1 or X-Pro3... it wouldn't hurt if they did titanium/Duratec as an option, but I'm afraid most would complain about its asking price).
“You don’t buy a Mercedes or BMW because its the smart thing to do” - makes a lot of sense for this situation
The XPro3 isn't exactly a Leica..I have one, it's a great piece of kit and I LOVE it. But it costs under $2000 USD which is very affordable.
I flip down the screen and often use it like an old box camera. The camera itself I love because it reminds me of a Leica with no frills, big logos etc. It’s a pleasure to use in the street.
So many people focus on the lcd screen and it doesn’t bother me one bit. I actually really like the design and I find it functional for my needs
I don't get why so many people even compare it to the X-T3 spec-wise and ask what it's point is, as you said the point/main feature is the optical viewfinder and a different shooting experience, and nobody should have a problem deciding between the two. I love the concept, but learned from my x100 that I don't actually ever use the optical viewfinder, so I know the X-Pro won't ever be my camera but I still like it a lot. About the screen, I also like the concept and if this was the only difference it wouldn't keep me from buying - actually I'd love to see it on an X-E body. Apart from the chimping, I'm often in situations where no back screen can be a plus, like small concerts etc. where I usually disable the back screen anyway to be more stealthy. Also, my Fujis are already often mistaken for film cameras by the security, no back screen would help me even more to get my camera into a concert without a photo pass. :)
This is an interesting take on the X-Pro3 Hyun. As a point of correction, this camera is not a rangefinder. It only simulates a rangefinder with its OVF functionality. The only company making digital or mirrorless rangefinders is Leica. I have no particular interest in this camera. If I want Classic Negative, I can create a recipe on my camera to emulate it and it will work with raw output. My X-E3 does everything I need it to do as a street and travel camera. This camera is for those who one can afford it and want the latest and greatest Fujifilm has to offer in its X-Pro line.
But when I think about the petty complaints I hear and read about this or any camera from any manufacturer my default response is, this camera is not for you. Simply don't buy it and move along. Photography has never been about the camera, it has always been about one's eye and ability to compose a shot to make great photographs. The camera and your lenses are nothing more than tools. Yes, we all want better tools but my question is, did you master using the one you have? In most cases, the answer is no.
It seems to be en vogue to complain about everything these days. Maybe it's a generational thing but in my view, the X-Pro1 is still a perfectly good camera. So is the X-Pro2, X-H1, X-T2, X-E1, X-E2, and X-E2s. I see people making beautiful photos every day with these older cameras. If you want to become a better photographer, shoot every day as often as you can and review your work, critique your work, allow others to critique it as well. That's the only way to get better at what you do.
If you think the tool is going to make you better, you're wrong and should take up another hobby or profession. To everyone reading this, I've shot Canon full-frame and APS-C as well as Panasonic LUMIX M43 professionally and eventually moved over to Fujifilm. Why you might ask because something about the design of their cameras makes me want to shoot both as my hobby and professional. I say use the camera that suits your style of shooting, perfect your craft and make great art. That's all that's needed of us as photographers.
The back screen opened opened give a very clear bright view, and comes into its own for waist level shots. Had it now for over a year and it has become my favourite.
I recently picked one up and I love it. The back screen is no issue at all. I don't know what everyone is complaining about haha.
I recently got the x pro 3. I have been shooting with the original x100 since it came out years ago. I went with the x pro 3 over the v because I wanted a new experience. If I got the v i feel like it would have been the same as the x100 but "better". The 3 re energized the excitement of on the go photography for me.
to me, this is the ultimate blend of work and lifestyle camera. It forces you to focus on taking pictures, where we've gotten used to just the process, but not experiencing what we're doing.
On my dslr I used the top lcd display solely with my rear screen turned off and just getting used to knowing what settings work with the current lighting I'm in.
Switching to a mirrorless I lost that top lcd display and were in need of some kind of screen to remember my settings, and slowly I got more and more used to chimping on the rear screen.
I'll be getting this camera because I sense that it's one of those cameras that make you interested in photography again and not just tech.
I agree... it's ALWAYS been about the viewfinder when it comes to the X-Pro line.
I like how you compare "the camera you need" and "the camera you want" 😉
I borrowed and shot this camera for a day from Fuji's House of Photography London and I like it. My back ground was originally film and I've recently had my Leica M3 serviced and using it again. I've owned since the 80's when I was a professional re-toucher in London, the studio used Nikon SLR and Hasselblad, which where modern! so for personal use I bought the retro M3 (I would say it was more old fashioned then, than it is now thanks to scanning), I also had the M8, terrible screen and a Lumix G1 with the screen turned it for 3 years before I remembered it was there.. I am, you may of guessed not a chipper, to the point that I should do it more. I mis-set the minimum shutter speed flash sync on a X100S (it cycles full round the values whereas the on the M8 it stopped top or bottom, so I'd moved it past the fastest sync and ended up on the lowest at a wedding and when i got home the backgrounds where double shadowed and blurred. Anyhow, for me photography is a hobby now and whatever camera you have, once you add up the lenses, filters, bag etc it costs a lot of money. I have a tone of cheap stuff, house hold goods, vacuum cleaners, kids toys etc made in China. I have very little stuff made elsewhere, so it's also nice to have a Made in Japan camera, Made in Switzerland watch, Made in Germany car. Made in France Saxophone for the luxury things that I tend to keep for a long time. (watch 35 years, car 19, Saxophone 25). Is there a difference in quality, well there can be but not guaranteed. Does it perform better? in Fuji's case No.This camera performs exceptionally well and has a lot of personality, if it meets your photographic needs and you can afford it, it is something that you will take out and hold for no reason whatsoever. I'm probably the market their after. Its a shame the little pop up EVF window in the OVF used for showing focus point, exposure etc doesn't do the quick 0.5 sec review. I'm sure it could. Have you used that feature, it's good for manual focus. Finally as a PS, you have a great, honest and welcoming style. Well done.
That's so interesting they offer different options like that for the screens; I don't have much knowledge about Fujifilm cameras, but they seem to be contributing to the market in their own ways and staying competitive. I probably wouldn't spend the extra money for my needs
completely off topic but what did you think about the the 1DxM3
i actually like the button in the front, but yes i can see the problem not looking at the front
I actually kind of like the flip screen. They seem similar is comparison. But for $500 less... I'll take the X-T3
Toronto Eats yeah the X-T3 is a great value
All I shoot is analog Rangefinders, but I want a digital Camera. I feel like this one would be perfect for me...
It's not always true though that you see "the image" just when you took it. Mostly what you see is going to be that image, but some components can change. For example if you stop down a lens to say f8, they camera will still use the widest available aperture for focusing and metering, so what you see in the evf is lots of bokeh, and on the final shot, that aspect will be different. Had a day when i thought i was taking some images with shallow dof, only to realise i had accidentally set the aperture and there was no bokeh on the images XD
Thanks for posting an honest review. Many of the others seem like sponsored reviews.
Hi! How is it with glasses?
I hope they replace that small rear screen with an ISO dial. Much better use of the space at the back.
Or remove it entirely and allow the screen to flip down and articulate. That would solve a lot of the problems.
I think that's kind of crazy to think that amateurs shots through the back screen and professionals from the view finder.
We are humans and we all have our preferences.
I personally use the view finder but it's probably cause im blind and it helps me see better.
Unless I'm taking a low or high shot then I use the back screen.
which lens should i use?
I hear you about the dial and the on/off button.
When I got the mark 6d ii, the dial drove me crazy but now that I got accustomed, I actually appreciate the lock it has.
The Mamuchos Yeah, dials and buttons are always something you have to try yourself haha
For a camera intended for street shooters and film nerds, alot of people like to forget that shooting waist level is incredibly common in those two demographics. Its less conspicuous and is super easy to do on the xpro3. Also any articulation is better than the static screen of the xe3 and xpro2. Amusingly enough, nobody complains about static screens, and those are by far more of a sin. The xpro3 is 100% going to be a cult camera as its one a kind, not all cameras need to be designed the same. Once i have the funds im super excited to buy an xpro3
No one talks about the downgraded OVF on the X-pro3. The X-pro2 has 2 switchable magnification which is not talked about in reviews. This is very handy when you switch to longer focal lengths. The X-pro3 has 1 magnification.
Need an update to let us choose stop the evf from automatically switching to the ovf
Hey Hyun, nobody talks about HDR Mode, how does it preform in your opinion?
Just checked out the XPro 3 Dura Black. Wow, they show fingerprints immediately. I like the way it feels in the hand better than my XT2. However, I think I like the EVF on the XT2 more. It's just larger and I need all the visual help I can get. Plus the LCD viewing area on the Pro 3 is actually smaller. They all have pluses and minuses. Another great Fujifilm camera!
I think you should research the camera before you buy it or i’ll rent one if possible.No one is forcing anyone to buy a particular product or shoot/use one unless you work for a company that furnace you with a particular model.
. I just Can wrap my head around that the XT3 is a way superior camera in ever way. People justify it by saying that this a street photography camera but any camera can accomplish that including the XT3. I don’t get that tiny screen in the back. I feel about it like I feel about the EOS R Touch Bar. At least they should’ve allowed that tiny screen to at least to show your composition (even though is tiny). The price is another thing that I cant understand.
I got an XT3 it's a working horse however not very fun to use for a fuji camera. Despite the huge specs It's not what i want to carry everywhere... I much prefer x100f or xpro lineup or even the tiny nearly pocketable xt30 to get inspired
Peter Ferry agree an the X100f. I’ve been tempted to get it even it’s an old one.
in 15 years of photography, I have never had a dial accidentally changed, even on the XPRO 3
Cameras nowadays have more or less (not so distant) or similar imaging capabilities. Fujifilm has good or better imaging features. I'm a Nikon guy and owns a used Sony A6300 with only a 20mm 2.8 pancake attached to it. It's my go-getter camera before I set up my Nikons during photo shoots. I like the sturdy, sleek and minimalist design of Sony a6xxx cameras - specially the clean top plate with no protruding viewfinder on top. I'm scouting for a used a6600 with a good second-hand price. I just learned it has no built-in camera and the top plate is now firmer and cleaner.
As a video maker Fuji has never really registered as an option. After this review it remains not something we'd go to as an option 😂 but appreciate all the in depth information seems more like a photographer's line.
I just bought the Xpro 3. I have Leica Q2 and SL2S plus Fuji XT4. This is an amazing camera which I love. Great for street shooting when I dint want the 47MP of the Q2. can also take this fortravel and not worry lenses ar small and using manual focus peaking is amazing on this camera. Grteat review by the way enjoyed your perspective.
How do you explain the fact that, on the comparison of pictures at 7:29 and 7:33, the pictures of Classic Neg are sharper than the RAW ones...
The sharpness doesn't look any different to me but it can look that way because the processing adds more contrast.
@@HyunRalphJeong Thanks for your response ! Have a nice day !
I don't think we would pay $200 just to have a different color camera.
But of course, that's just us, if they have it is because they have a market for it
Hi Hyun. I'm seriously thinking of buying this camera. I currently own the X-T3 and feel this would make a great second body as I really like the form factor of the rangefinder style. Your review was most informative and has pushed me closer to taking the plunge. Thank you. Cheers Z
XPro2 was a deal with sales.
@@PissTakeProduction If you're doing fast street work I'd say the AF and larger viewfinder on the X-Pro3 is worth the money, but if you're doing slower, more portrait based work then the X-Pro2 is a steal.
@@PeterEvansPeteTakesPictures i shoot with manual focus glass. But if you wear glasses I wouldn't recommend the XPro2
... pretty much what I did. It wasn't really that hard of a decision for me since I always contemplated getting an X-Pro camera after the first generation. Now it's the camera I grab for on a daily basis.
Zsolt Hary - I received mine two weeks ago and I really do like it. For street, the fastest release comes with the camera in manual focus, but that's true of most cameras, and focus peaking makes manual focus a breeze. What has worked best for me during the day has been manual focus, F8 as a starting point, 1/250 or higher, and Auto ISO set for 160-1600.
What Fuji tried to do here with the X-Pro3 is to make a camera similar to those Leica digital M cameras without the (ANY!) screen, but give you screens if you really want them at the same time. A win-win combination in my opinion. Would I buy one? Not likely, course I'll put my hard earned cash elsewhere... into lenses.
Fujifilm really upped their camera game and we like it, although the screen is a bit odd but you’re it’s fun to look at and give a satisfying feeling 😆
One of the better, logical, Xpro reviews...
ok i would love 4k60 - that would be insane.
I wrote you once and you responded very, very quick, so thanks for that :)
Right now, I am looking at the Fuji X-Pro3 or the Fuji X-T3, now the biggest differenc from my noob point of view is the Prize - here the Fuji X-Pro3 costs about 700 Euros more - and of course the fact that the X-Pro3 does not care for videos, which I like very much, since I do not either. Still I am confused as hell.
Haha you must be lucky because unfortunately UA-cam doesn't notify me every comment but yours was the first one on the list today.
You're right about the price of the X-Pro3, it is a bit confusing. I believe most of the additional cost goes to the hybrid viewfinder. I hear they're very expensive to make. And the rest for the slightly better build quality. If you care about video, the X-T3 is the much better option.
@@HyunRalphJeong
Thanks.
I'll then get the X-T3. I don't care about video, but since the photo capability seems to be rather equal, I don't mind not having a viewfinder. It's gonna be my first fuji, with the rest of the money I can then buy a good lense.
Thank you again.
Thank you for a very honest & informative video - really enjoyed it. I am an enthusiast who shoots family events, travel & street ( do intention of making money through photography), 90% of which is stills. Would you kindly answer these questions 1) I know the file size of the Sony in crop mode is approximately 10.4 Mb - will this produce 8.5x11 prints with enough resolution to still be pleasing to the eye 2) does the Fuji have a similar in camera feature? Thank you in advance for your answer. Morrie
Yes and no.
Happy 2020! The durability is a good selling point. Our camera has a few battle scars for sure. Haha Love the flip screen. That comparison with Mercedes is on point. We don't mind the design of the screen because it feels like it's protected. Nice comparison of the manual transmission too. Haha
Someone made a comment that Fuji try to tell a person how to shoot. I disagree with that. I think that Fuji put the emphasis on how the buying public can make best use of theirs product too theirs primary audience. Cameras in a way is just like buying a car. If you want a Certain make of car, it’s is there for you,if you want to pay the price. Everyone does not want or need a Mercedes been or Corvette to take the children to school when a Volkswagen will do the same thing. People complain about the cost of a camera, lens, and even batteries. I’m surprise and maybe I’m not,that there are so many people that would buy a product and not be aware of it limitations.
Man if all your dials get changed from your bag, maybe you should get another bag... I own both the xt-3 and the x-pro3 and this has never happened to me once...
10:08 - NO. Only some people do that. Especially now with EVFs.
Great to see you Hyun, best in 2020 to you and your family !
TheCanadianBubba and you as well! All the best to you and your family
Didn't know that stuff about the coating! Good info :)
Fuji rumors say XT-4 is imminent so why bother with this one. even if you are on a budget i would wait for xt-4 to come out and look for a deal on xt-3.
Ran Bar-Levi I hear lots of exciting things about the X-T4. Wonder when it’s coming out
There's always a new camera imminent though. :)
I think with the X-Pro line it's all down to the body, not the specs. I have both the Pro-3 and the X-T3 and I just prefer the X-Pro3's body. It fits really nice in the hand and it feels like it has such a low profile. I love the viewfinder too. The X-T3 is slightly more practical with its excellent battery grip and great for video, but I'm a stills shooter and the X-Pro3 can let you see more of the scene as you shoot owing to its range-finder style viewfinder. To be honest, now we've hit a certain tech level in cameras it's becoming less about the innards (nearly all cameras are capable of taking great photos) and more about ergonomics. Therefore even if the X-T4 outmatches the X-Pro3 from a specs standpoint, the X-Pro3 might still be the one to get for some people. From a price point the X-T3 is definitely the smarter option, and for those who don't care about an OVF or the range-finder experience I say definitely get that one instead, but the X-Pro3 definitely has a place.
I guess because this camera is for a completely different audience. There's no point in comparing their specs, X-Pro3 is for people who like that concept, X-T3 is for those who don't and they're not made to compete with each other. If you're not into the optical viewfinder, there's no point in considering the X-Pro3 - that's still it's main feature and what makes it so much more expensive.
I do wonder about the finish choices on the XPro-3 in reference to re-sale. I guess time will tell if second hand buyers value the scratch resistance. I did go for the Dura Black and don't mind the finger prints.Heck, it look kind of like the camera has camp on it ;) A few wipes with a Zeiss lens cleaner wipe pretty much takes care of the grunge. I just do that when it really gets bad.
camo not camp, sorry about the auto correct!
Bill haha yeah, I don’t mind weathered look on my cameras especially with Fujis.
@@HyunRalphJeong I've got the Dura-Black, here's a Pro-Tip (Ha! A pun!) if you completely smudge up the camera with your thumbprints it stops looking dirty and gets a real nice even matte gun-metal style look to it that's actually pretty sweet. My advice is to give it a courtesy clean once every couple of weeks and if you ever sell it on, and to otherwise enjoy the darker, Mamiya 6 kind of shade you get with a good smudging up.
Hey ralph
I shoot wedding with 6d mark2 so what lenses should i buy ?
24-70
@@PissTakeProduction f4 or f2.8
@@motasmomar2674 F2.8 as you would get more light in esp for weddings. But i found Canon really has dated with their EF range. I moved to Fujifilm. Sold the Canon 5DIII with 24-105mm F4. They are just long in the tooth spec wise.
As you use APSC try 16-35mm if you need wider.
Yeah, 24-70 2.8 and then 70-200 2.8, if you’re using one camera.
LOL I agree, you don't buy a mercedes or bmw because it's the smart thing to do, you really gotta want it! It definitely is the same with cameras! The flip screen for $500 is a little steep though..
New to the chanel, just wanted to say that this was unquestionably the best review I’ve seen. Great Job 🤝
I’m a portrait and headshot photographer and I use the XT3 and X100V. I was thinking about adding the XT4, but now I’m seriously considering an XPRO3 after falling for the X100.
May I ask, do you think the XPRO3 is up to the task for paid portrait work (studio and natural light). I also sometimes photograph families and occasional live performances. Mostly paid portraits.
Do you think that the XPRO3 could handle all of that?
I got one to replace the Leica Q2 I had. Perfect camera for me, so far.
Sounds like downgrading
Honest and straightforward review. Excellent presentation. Will subscribe.
Glad to see your back sir
As informative and unbiased as usual
Can you recommend me a photography book for beginner sir?
Aditya Rosyid Thank you! Try “Read this if you want to take great photographs” by Henry Carrol
...I love my PRO3 (and my old PRO1... and my 100...and my GFX S...)
If I was a pro, it would be a pain to have to work with tools you hate...12+ hours a day... I am just an amateur...but I need a camera I like to enjoy my hobby...I need a camera I feel comfortable with...that produces files I like (I do not say "the best camera or the best files...") I have an old Canon EOS 1D mark1 that I hate (both the camera and the files)...but I recognise it's a excellent camera... just not for me!
GAUROCH2 I have an Xpro 1 , do you think I should get the Xpro 2
@@sherwinh1661
I love my Fuji files!
I never had the Pro 2
If money is a major issue, perhaps the II should be considered...
I jumped from the 1 to the 3 and I just love it.
My major problem with the Pro 1 is the lack of diopter correction...
Good review, but every review on this camera misses one big feature of the flip screen...it gives you a waist-level viewfinder (like an old school Hasselblad medium format) for stealth shots. This is a purpose-driven design...a street photographer's camera!
Thank you! I didn't think waist level shooting was something that needed to be explained since most cameras can do that nowadays but yes, it is very useful in that regard.
Hyun Ralph Jeong Yeah, most cameras do allow for that, but the simple “flip down” design is faster and easier than it is to get the same view on an XT-3. Either way, it’s a quirky camera but I love it! Fuji really makes me want to go out and take photos all the time!
Thanks man. Perfect review and I agree with you about the flip screen.
Buying a Mercedes is not the smartest thing to do... Only if you're trying to buy a car and you're on a budget. Xpro3 is more like a Chrysler 300... A good car that kinda looks like a RR phantom, if you squint your eyes a bit...
Enjoyed watching your review; no nonsense. TQ
Love my X-PRO 3. Well done with video.
Fuji X-Pro3. Wow amazing!
Cameras don't usually annoy me and I don't even have any interest in Fuji being a m4/3 shooter but that camera just bugs me because Fuji designed it telling you how to shoot.
WHO IS SERAFIN it does feel a bit pretentious
Mr Tech well being a G9 shooter I like to have all my settings easily visible on screen at all times. And correct anything overhead is out of the question. Just a annoying camera.
@Paul Jones: They lost you as a customer, but gained me as one. The fact that Fuji think differently is what has recently drawn me to their brand. I don't see their approach as arrogant or limiting. It feels like they are inviting the user to take photographs in a slower, more considered way. Plus, they make other designs with near-identical the specs for those who want a general purpose camera. They give us choice.
I am interested to know how well the X-Pro3 is selling. I waited several months for a second-hand one but none became available in my area. So either they are selling very badly or people are buying them, liking them and keeping them. I had to cough up for a new one, but due to virus lockdown I have not yet put it properly to the test. I can't wait to break free...
@Paul Jones You make some valid points, many of which I agree with; especially the remarkable lack of innovation in today's cameras. But I prefer not to dwell on these issues.
My hobby/passion is primarily photography (not cameras). I will go out and buy the cameras and lenses that are closest to being the ones that a) I enjoy using, b) deliver the image quality I need and c) I can afford.
My perfect camera will never exist. I just learn to live with whatever I end up buying and everything else is about creating images.
You are a sensible reviewer, bravo!
I don't know why it didn't use Canons screen design. Its to much Sony like.
No magnifier on ovf. Costs too much
Subscriber here, love your vids etc. But have to say that your classic negative explanation is way off. For anyone wondering please look up how Fuji develops these.
astudios Ah, thank you. I actually learned a lot from looking it up. I think the more accurate description would have been “lower saturation with higher contrast.”
Great review.
Since this is a "pro" camera, I wish they offered options for the LCD screen to meet the needs of different photography styles. My choice would be a screen similar to what's on the x100v.
good explanation, like tom sawyer who liked to paint the fence 😜
Buy xpro2 with graphite version 1000 usd i got one
Hi my friend 👍 very cool video 👍 I don't much about cameras but I do learn a lot from you 😊
I have yet to see a review of the XPro3 where the person doing the review "gets it." This one is certainly no different. I own one and love it but this camera isn't for everyone. Well, maybe it is, cause at the time of typing this you cannot buy an all-black XPro3 anywhere in North America. If you don't like the OVF, sub-display, fiddly exposure comp dial and hidden LCD then fuck off, the XPro3 is not for you. Go back to Sony. BTW who relies on raw files when shooting Fuji X series cameras? The jpegs are delicious, learn how to shoot the jpegs. Fuji didn't invest millions into film simulations so you could process raw files in LR lol. Go back to Sony if you wanna shoot raw. Dayum.
i want to see the histogram of your videos
My videos? Or my photos?
@@HyunRalphJeong Im just joking since your videos are mostly black 70% of the frame :D
I love Fuji mirrorless products and have the XPRO2, but I dont like the concept of the XPRO3 screen. I think the movable screen position is a hazard and can be damaged. The film screen is a gimmick. If the main screen would fold flat and show images, that might work.
Strangely, nearly every reviewer has no issues with this model. In some ways Im glad it has the "flaw." Now I wont make an impulsive decision to upgrade my XPRO2.
❤️❤️❤️
X pro1 x ever
Seems too fussy in my opinion. I’ll pass.
that screen.... just throw this camera in the bin