Wonderful documentary of the production process of the Pz.Kwg III and the StuG III. Although quite expensive the tank itself was considered by the Germans that it had better off road capability than the Pz.Kwg III. The tank had limited development and and because it's relatively small size it couldn't be fitted with a bigger cannon so basically the last main battle was the battle of Kursk. The StuG III was produced until the final day of the of war. The last production was at the giant factory at Marienfiel just outside of Berlin.
@@briandonavan2872 the cannon 7.5 cm StuK 40 L/48 of the StuG III was already a tight fit and altrough quite successful it was not possible to install the much more powerful cannon namely the 7.5 cm PaK 42 L/70 (the same for the Panther but without muzzle break). To use this cannon it was created the Jagdpanzer IV but it was not an overall success because of the excessive weight of the long barrel stressing the front pairs of suspensions and wheels, limited off road capability and some other issues.
One of the issues with German tanks is that they were a bit too well built with very tight tolerances. Consequently, they were often difficult to repair quickly in the battlefield after sustaining damage.
@@The_Conspiracy_Analyst All one has to do is know how to use a micrometer to reverse engineer. The Russians did that with the entire Boeing B-29 Superfortress after WWII.
The first jet from Germany The first ballistic missile from Germany ... even the sinking of the Bismarck which was wrecked while in check is still good ... indeed the best German technology
None of those helped them win the war in the slightest. In fact, I'd say they hurt Germany in the long run, being a waste of precious resources and all.
@@theamberabyss1745 If one is outnumbered 4:1 the best equipment doesnt help, moreover it came too late like the Ubout XXI, StG44, infrared, Leiber-Camo, Jets, rockets, modular E series tanks. WWII was decided by industrial capacity.
@@theamberabyss1745 If there was even one, they were threated better than the prisioners that died in Eisenhowers death camps (Rhein medow camps) or the ones that were in Guantanamo not long ago.
@@paulusradomski Victims of Eisenhowers policy who I had opportunity to talk, had different point of view. War does not determine who is right only what is left.
And all this did not help the Germans win the war. In the USSR, tanks were assembled by women, children and old people without any cranes, etc. This is truly a real feat.
Unlike the USA, German industry was never geared up for mass production on any level even before the war. For example, the American car manufacturers being automated entering the war shifted gears and modified their assembly lines to produce armaments. For every tank, Germany made the US made 15, etc. When it came to sheer armament by volume compared to the US Germany was doomed.
@@СергейАлександрович-р5ч Produktivnost rada pozadine u manufakturi kojim su Nemci ostvarili nadmoć na istočnom frontu je za svaku pohvalu, dokle Rusi nisu imali puške na Staljingradu u opsadi, već su bili po njih 5 crvenoarmejaca na jednu pušku i tukli se lopatama. Zar ne?
Calm down wehraboo. Germany couldn't even mass produce ONE four engined bomber, the US pumped them out by the hour, with plants capable of rolling out one B-24 every hour. As for tanks, their most produced tank - the Panther - was plagued by defects due to the rushed nature of the project, with about 6000 units built. By comparison, the Sherman was producted in 49,234 units. So no, Germany was quite well matched at the time, and today it's not even worth arguing, what the hell are you smoking. One area where Germany peaked was their research of aerodynamics and rocket propulsion, with nazi germany's largest wind tunnels being still in use today. And the space race was in large part aided by german scientists. But at the same time nazi germany was so limited in production capability most of their logistics were on horseback for all the war, because they couldn't build enough trucks.
@@Galf506 He177 was a German 4-mot bomber with more than 1, 100 built. 2 props but 4 mots and about the capabilities of a Lancaster. So, although just a fraction of Allied 4-mots numbers, yes, the Germans could and did mass produce big bombers but it wasn't their priority. And yes in general Germany was out produced big times by both East and West. Btw. the Panther wasn't the most produced tank but the Pz IV. And the StuG even reached bigger numbers but wasn't technically a tank.
Obsessed with perfection the Germans ended up overengineering in their warlike equipment . Much resources were wasted where they were not needed . Complex mechanisms were not simplified to speed up production .... Unlike the Soviet union which laid a balanced emphasis on numbers and quality . Ultimately the Russians swarmed the battlefield with increasingly larger number of war like equipment especially tanks ( T-34s) and artillery.... The nominal advantage that the Gernmans had due to technology were lost to these Soviet numbers . " Quantity is also a quality " went the communist saying . An example is the mechanism that was used to retain tank tracks in place in T34 s .... The Russians had a simple block that pushed the track link back in place as the track rolled .... While the track German had elaborately made links to have them in place ..... All this meant slower production rates . . The Germans being a"superior race " would not compromise to the need of the hour ..
Soviet can't defeat german alone....they tactic just simple...throw meat to the grinder..until the grinder exhausted ...if they do it alone the meat not enough to make the grinder exhausted
Many people overly criticize german war production, and overly emphasize the russian "Cheap" one but forgetts that the germans were better with that regard. So lets take a look. In all the Soviets lost some 83.500 turreted tanks in ww2 which is some 77% or their full stock. And keep in mind tanks such as the t-44 and IS 3 and other prototypes which did not deployed in the war but still produced by hundreds regardles are giving a reasonable percentage to the survivors (Like the t-44 of which they built 350 during the war.) And let's not forgett human losses as being 8,668,400 soldiers killed and 22,326,905 were wounded. Now lets compare the german losses for the eastern front. For the human numbers The germans lost 1,105,987 soldiers being killed and 3,498,059 being injured, That's puts the K/D ration to 1 to 6,7 in favor of the germans in human losses. The germans lost a total of 25,584 armored vehicles on the eastern front (Keep in mind the soviet number I was given above only counted turreted tanks) Still it gives 1:3 ration in favor of the germans. During the war the production ration was 1:3 in favor of the Soviets. However Tank exchange ration was 1:4,4 in favor of the germans. Which puts it simple. the germans managed to destroy more soviet tanks than which they could produce. It really puts the opinion that the germans would defeat the soviet union in an 1v1 fight. And don't forgett the germans in 1943 were about to produce their tanks at reduced cost and man hours, as they were chosen gas cutting instead of machining on their newer vehicles and made additional steps to make their production more efficent with imporved output. It was the allied bombing campaing and the bottleneck on the supply chain of raw materials as due to bombings trains only travelled at poor visibility conditions and also due to the fact that they could not use lights (Air raids) they were not able to produce in 24/7. Now imagine what would happen without British, US air interruption!
Only about 8% of the whole German military budget went for armored vehicles during WW2.During the first half of the war German armament industry operated in bare minimum capacity and only produced vehicles to replace losses.Also manufacturing techniques were not suitable for mass production either.Roughly 50% of all 47,000 German tanks and assault guns between 1939-1945 were produced in 1944 and first months of 1945(19,000+ and ~4,000 respectively) Despite having a considerably larger industry and resources than Soviets between 1941-1944(besides oil and some rare minerals) they produced less than half as many tanks.
i read that, along with the Panther tank one... it's mostly a bunch of lies and fabrications if you ask me. When they make the Russian female soldier get inside the tank - nope. Bunch of lies
Strategically, Germany had little chance to win the war. Without sources of raw petroleum they were struggling to fuel their war machine. Even with the massive coal gassification industry they still needed raw petroleum to make lubricating oils. All they had was the Ploesti oil fields in Rumania which were under almost constant air attack during the war. Had they grabbed the Caucuses oil fields in Russia, they would have used almost as much coal energy transporting it by train back to Germany to refine it as could have been gotten by just gassifying the coal used. WW2 was a desperate gamble by Germany just as by Japan and they both crapped out. You have to have strategic materials to win a modern war, end of story.
@@valval8957 German soldiers had much more skill than the soviets. Do not forget we fought on 3 fronts with less men, less equipment and less Armament.. You soviets always forget how much you dependef on American weapons support (Lend Lease program). And still, Germany managed to fight a war it was destined to lose from the beginning for almost 4 full years. This is superhuman!
Guess I talked up the commies in other comment sections lately, in order for this to pop up in my recommendations! Nice try CommieTube!🤷🏿♂️🙏🏿🇺🇲👌🏿✊🏿💪🏿✌🏿👍🏿
Interesting to see all these workers without any personal safety gear such as hard hats, safety goggles, gloves and hearing protection.
今なら 労働安全衛生法違反ですよね💦👷🥊👟🚩
@@シマチビ Indeed!
The good old safety squint.
You get your iron from those metal shavings in your eye.
@@memucanhunt1 Indeed!
Wonderful documentary of the production process of the Pz.Kwg III and the StuG III. Although quite expensive the tank itself was considered by the Germans that it had better off road capability than the Pz.Kwg III. The tank had limited development and and because it's relatively small size it couldn't be fitted with a bigger cannon so basically the last main battle was the battle of Kursk. The StuG III was produced until the final day of the of war. The last production was at the giant factory at Marienfiel just outside of Berlin.
I always wondered how the war could of went if they could've fit a long barrel 75mm gun?
@@briandonavan2872 the cannon 7.5 cm StuK 40 L/48 of the StuG III was already a tight fit and altrough quite successful it was not possible to install the much more powerful cannon namely the 7.5 cm PaK 42 L/70 (the same for the Panther but without muzzle break). To use this cannon it was created the Jagdpanzer IV but it was not an overall success because of the excessive weight of the long barrel stressing the front pairs of suspensions and wheels, limited off road capability and some other issues.
The Panzer III is a really nice tank with very modern proportions.
And this was the little guys. Imagine working on the Tiger line
I would love to see that.
Espcially the Tiger II
advanced German chemists and metallurgists allowed this manufacturing miracle to happen..along with the best lathe operators and machinists
One of the issues with German tanks is that they were a bit too well built with very tight tolerances. Consequently, they were often difficult to repair quickly in the battlefield after sustaining damage.
And slave labour.
@@WAL_DC-6B The reason they designed it that way was to hamper reverse engineering efforts which would always be attempted with captured gear.
@@The_Conspiracy_Analyst All one has to do is know how to use a micrometer to reverse engineer. The Russians did that with the entire Boeing B-29 Superfortress after WWII.
Whoa 😮, that's one massive production line of beasts during a war time.
Still only a fifth of what USA and USSR built.
So it's IKEA but for Panzers
The first jet from Germany The first ballistic missile from Germany ... even the sinking of the Bismarck which was wrecked while in check is still good ... indeed the best German technology
None of those helped them win the war in the slightest. In fact, I'd say they hurt Germany in the long run, being a waste of precious resources and all.
First infrared scope
First ecogreen culture
First anti tabacoo programs
First laptop
And much more
@@dukehawks Ecofasism isn't a good thing though
@@theamberabyss1745 because more people are lazzy and dirty thats why thing that
@@theamberabyss1745 If one is outnumbered 4:1 the best equipment doesnt help, moreover it came too late like the Ubout XXI, StG44, infrared, Leiber-Camo, Jets, rockets, modular E series tanks. WWII was decided by industrial capacity.
Thanks to all the workers for your service. RIP.
I wonder how many were enslaved
@@theamberabyss1745 If there was even one, they were threated better than the prisioners that died in Eisenhowers death camps (Rhein medow camps) or the ones that were in Guantanamo not long ago.
@@daveco4781 victims of German system of slave work, whom I had opportunity to talk, had different point of view.
@@paulusradomski Victims of Eisenhowers policy who I had opportunity to talk, had different point of view. War does not determine who is right only what is left.
@@daveco4781 Nice try of change of the subject.
they have the technology beyond of time
And all this did not help the Germans win the war. In the USSR, tanks were assembled by women, children and old people without any cranes, etc. This is truly a real feat.
"assembled by blah blah blah" I think you mean came in crates stamped "U.S." 🤣🤣🤣
LA MEJOR TECNOLOGÍA EN SU TIEMPO FUE LA ALEMANA 💪👍 A 5O AÑOS POR ENCIMA DE CUALQUIER PAÍS.
Así es, los Alemanes desarrollaron muchos inventos y nuevas tecnologías
Saludos
Was that why they won?
Hace 80 años y todavía sorprende esa capacidad industrial.
Excelente video histórico. Saludos desde Buenos Aires
Unlike the USA, German industry was never geared up for mass production on any level even before the war. For example, the American car manufacturers being automated entering the war shifted gears and modified their assembly lines to produce armaments. For every tank, Germany made the US made 15, etc. When it came to sheer armament by volume compared to the US Germany was doomed.
In the year 2021 , can indonesia build something like that on their own without importing a single component ?
I would have enjoyed working there with brisk music at the workplace and Harry Giese commenting every move I make.
Красивые немецкие танки.
Что в них красивого,,, красиво убивать?
@@СергейАлександрович-р5ч
Produktivnost rada pozadine u manufakturi kojim su Nemci ostvarili nadmoć na istočnom frontu je za svaku pohvalu, dokle Rusi nisu imali puške na Staljingradu u opsadi, već su bili po njih 5 crvenoarmejaca na jednu pušku i tukli se lopatama. Zar ne?
@@aneozivota5699 если ты чех, то шкода классная машина 👍
No one can match the technology of Germany at that time and even Now.......
That's hilarious.
Calm down wehraboo. Germany couldn't even mass produce ONE four engined bomber, the US pumped them out by the hour, with plants capable of rolling out one B-24 every hour.
As for tanks, their most produced tank - the Panther - was plagued by defects due to the rushed nature of the project, with about 6000 units built. By comparison, the Sherman was producted in 49,234 units.
So no, Germany was quite well matched at the time, and today it's not even worth arguing, what the hell are you smoking.
One area where Germany peaked was their research of aerodynamics and rocket propulsion, with nazi germany's largest wind tunnels being still in use today. And the space race was in large part aided by german scientists.
But at the same time nazi germany was so limited in production capability most of their logistics were on horseback for all the war, because they couldn't build enough trucks.
@@Galf506 the STUG/Panzer III/IV platform was the most produced German tank, not the panther
Galf506 Go Home
@@Galf506 He177 was a German 4-mot bomber with more than 1, 100 built. 2 props but 4 mots and about the capabilities of a Lancaster. So, although just a fraction of Allied 4-mots numbers, yes, the Germans could and did mass produce big bombers but it wasn't their priority. And yes in general Germany was out produced big times by both East and West.
Btw. the Panther wasn't the most produced tank but the Pz IV. And the StuG even reached bigger numbers but wasn't technically a tank.
Nothing beats that New Panzer smell.
Обрати внимание сделано в Германии :-)
Квадратиш панцеркампфагиш гуд!
was that a brass sledge hammer? hope so..otherwise he mushroomed that "axle hub"..lol
Чистенько у них там))
Obsessed with perfection the Germans ended up overengineering in their warlike equipment . Much resources were wasted where they were not needed . Complex mechanisms were not simplified to speed up production .... Unlike the Soviet union which laid a balanced emphasis on numbers and quality . Ultimately the Russians swarmed the battlefield with increasingly larger number of war like equipment especially tanks ( T-34s) and artillery.... The nominal advantage that the Gernmans had due to technology were lost to these Soviet numbers . " Quantity is also a quality " went the communist saying .
An example is the mechanism that was used to retain tank tracks in place in T34 s .... The Russians had a simple block that pushed the track link back in place as the track rolled .... While the track German had elaborately made links to have them in place ..... All this meant slower production rates . . The Germans being a"superior race " would not compromise to the need of the hour ..
german productions were ok but country was overwhelmed by a 2 front war. Luckily in the war that's going to come the table will turn.
Soviet can't defeat german alone....they tactic just simple...throw meat to the grinder..until the grinder exhausted ...if they do it alone the meat not enough to make the grinder exhausted
Many people overly criticize german war production, and overly emphasize the russian "Cheap" one but forgetts that the germans were better with that regard.
So lets take a look. In all the Soviets lost some 83.500 turreted tanks in ww2 which is some 77% or their full stock. And keep in mind tanks such as the t-44 and IS 3 and other prototypes which did not deployed in the war but still produced by hundreds regardles are giving a reasonable percentage to the survivors (Like the t-44 of which they built 350 during the war.)
And let's not forgett human losses as being 8,668,400 soldiers killed and 22,326,905 were wounded.
Now lets compare the german losses for the eastern front.
For the human numbers The germans lost 1,105,987 soldiers being killed and 3,498,059 being injured, That's puts the K/D ration to 1 to 6,7 in favor of the germans in human losses.
The germans lost a total of 25,584 armored vehicles on the eastern front (Keep in mind the soviet number I was given above only counted turreted tanks) Still it gives 1:3 ration in favor of the germans.
During the war the production ration was 1:3 in favor of the Soviets. However Tank exchange ration was 1:4,4 in favor of the germans.
Which puts it simple. the germans managed to destroy more soviet tanks than which they could produce. It really puts the opinion that the germans would defeat the soviet union in an 1v1 fight.
And don't forgett the germans in 1943 were about to produce their tanks at reduced cost and man hours, as they were chosen gas cutting instead of machining on their newer vehicles and made additional steps to make their production more efficent with imporved output. It was the allied bombing campaing and the bottleneck on the supply chain of raw materials as due to bombings trains only travelled at poor visibility conditions and also due to the fact that they could not use lights (Air raids) they were not able to produce in 24/7.
Now imagine what would happen without British, US air interruption!
@@mulkanmulkan5620 operation bagration wants a word with you, the entirety of belarus and eastern poland taken in less than 9 weeks
The Soviet Union would have been wounded beyond repair without constant U.S supply
Good old times
Fueron y serán los mejores👏👏👏👏
🇩🇪👍❤️
Wo wurde das gefilmt ?
Only about 8% of the whole German military budget went for armored vehicles during WW2.During the first half of the war German armament industry operated in bare minimum capacity and only produced vehicles to replace losses.Also manufacturing techniques were not suitable for mass production either.Roughly 50% of all 47,000 German tanks and assault guns between 1939-1945 were produced in 1944 and first months of 1945(19,000+ and ~4,000 respectively)
Despite having a considerably larger industry and resources than Soviets between 1941-1944(besides oil and some rare minerals) they produced less than half as many tanks.
Lack of workers and high degree of specialisation.
The german tanks were harder to build.
What amount was produced before than?
protip: Soviets/Russians lie about just about everything
Theo place of birth Grubber's little tank ...
I recommend reading "Tiger Tracks".
i read that, along with the Panther tank one... it's mostly a bunch of lies and fabrications if you ask me. When they make the Russian female soldier get inside the tank - nope. Bunch of lies
Нельзя наживаться на войне.
Ты это западу (и особенно наглосаксам скажи)
Strategically, Germany had little chance to win the war. Without sources of raw petroleum they were struggling to fuel their war machine. Even with the massive coal gassification industry they still needed raw petroleum to make lubricating oils. All they had was the Ploesti oil fields in Rumania which were under almost constant air attack during the war. Had they grabbed the Caucuses oil fields in Russia, they would have used almost as much coal energy transporting it by train back to Germany to refine it as could have been gotten by just gassifying the coal used. WW2 was a desperate gamble by Germany just as by Japan and they both crapped out. You have to have strategic materials to win a modern war, end of story.
Neato.
"Бестен ваффен" и "бестен золдатен" оказались не такими уж и "бестен".
Ну да, ну да (((
@@HopletSplayserovich этому можно только порадоваться.
Of course they were the best... Doesn't mean there was enough of them
@@hanhdhsj было бы их больше - трупами бы завалили, и шапками закидали, да? ;)
Воевать надобно не числом, а уменьем, как говорил Суворов ;)
@@valval8957 German soldiers had much more skill than the soviets.
Do not forget we fought on 3 fronts with less men, less equipment and less Armament..
You soviets always forget how much you dependef on American weapons support (Lend Lease program).
And still, Germany managed to fight a war it was destined to lose from the beginning for almost 4 full years.
This is superhuman!
Good
Ja,ja . Uber alles.
Amazing germanischens
JAWOHL !!!!! DER PANZER ROLLT AUF DEM FELD !!!
туда бы водородную бомбу прям в этот цех
Nisu svi Nemci fašisti, ovo je samo radnička klasa koja radom podržava svoju vojsku u napredovanju ka Moskvi.
Sada radim prekovremeno na tome! haha
Beautiful machines for an ugly age
Красиво, но низкая производительность труда и обилие деталей мех.обработки.
Worse than a T34/76,except for reliability
Guess I talked up the commies in other comment sections lately, in order for this to pop up in my recommendations! Nice try CommieTube!🤷🏿♂️🙏🏿🇺🇲👌🏿✊🏿💪🏿✌🏿👍🏿
Deutschland Deutschland Uber alles❤️💪
Кувалдочкой не гнушаются.Но в рукавицах работать не любят
во время войны наверно была экономия на рукавицах и робах, в рф эта экономия всегда а не только во время войны люди тут нафиг не нужны.
Deutchland Deutchland Uber Alles
The genius country
Лучше бы дороги строили.
Лучше бы космос развивали( но видать хозяева внешнеки) не заинтересованы (((
Дойчи квалитет
旋盤が でかい❗️
ここはあなたのお母さんの大隈ではありません！
Medal of honor to Germans.
Obrigado.
Impeccable brain and rugged muscle. Real early toxic masculinity
🇩🇪
Deutsche Handwerkskunst.