More Fake News From Buzzfeed and Horrible New Footage Shows What Really Happened with Philando
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- AGH! Hope you enjoy the show. Jumping on a train to VidCon now. kkloveyofacesbyeeeeee
THAT’S AMAZING - Charity Shirt: teespring.com/...
That’s Amazing Kid’s Sizes: teespring.com/...
THAT’S AMAZING! (vlog): • Video
TheDeFrancoFam Vlog: • WHERE DOES ALL THIS EN...
------------
WOW! Huge Scandal Shutdown, Huffpost Exposed, and Disturbing Info Coming Out About Otto Warmbier: • WOW! Huge Scandal Shut...
Receiving Threats From DO5 Fans and UA-cam Extremism VS Free Speech: • Receiving Threats From...
------------
TODAY IN AWESOME:
VidCon Schedule: / 876889335617867776
Steam Summer Sale: / 877209458643845120
Honest Trailers Power Rangers: • Honest Trailers - Powe...
Standard EBooks: standardebooks...
American Assassin Trailer: • AMERICAN ASSASSIN - RE...
Game of Thrones Trailer: / 10154877545592734
Secret Link: • Video
STORIES:
Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman Paycheck Controversy: www.elle.com/cu...
www.businessins...
www.bustle.com...
www.vox.com/cu...
deadline.com/20...
www.hollywoodre...
“The Slants” Trademark:
www.cnn.com/201...
www.rollingston...
www.nytimes.co...
www.forbes.com...
www.cnn.com/201...
Philando Castille:
www.foxnews.com...
www.cnn.com/201...
www.nytimes.co...
www.washington...
www.mprnews.or...
www.mprnews.or...
www.aljazeera.c...
• Thousands protest agai...
------------
JOIN THE ADVENTURE: DeFrancoElite.com
GET SOME GEAR: teespring.com/...
------------
FACEBOOK: on. mqpRW7
TWITTER: / phillyd
INSTAGRAM: / phillydefranco
SNAPCHAT: TheDeFrancoFam
REDDIT: / defranco
ITUNES: DeFrancoMistake...
SOUNDCLOUD: letsmakemistake...
GOOGLE PLAY: mistakeswithdef...
------------
Edited by:
James Girardier - / jamesgirardier
Produced by:
Amanda Morones - / mandaohdang
Motion Graphics Artist:
Brian Borst - / brianjborst
P.O. BOX
Attn: Philip DeFranco
16350 Ventura Blvd
Ste D #542
Encino, CA 91436
;)
Philip DeFranco XD
he informed him of his gun....what about that action says I'm trying to shoot you first.......
(^:P
kink
To me, the problem with the Philando Castille verdict is the fact that juries are instructed to rule under law that permits an officer's actions 'if they feared for their life.' That wording is way too vague, and there needs to be more consideration as to whether the cop is justified in their fear. If the average citizen would not get away with a self-defence claim (unless they were rich/a celeb/there was bribery or threats/etc.), neither should a cop. There's a reason murder and manslaughter are separate terms but both face punishment.
If nothing else, Yanez's conduct and acquittal are a damning indictment of a system that either doesn't train cops well enough in responding to situations or doesn't apply sufficient scrutiny and assessment in who they allow to wear a badge.
As a licensed gun owner this terrifies me. By law whenever we are pulled over we have to inform the police officer that we have a weapon on our person. From the video that's when the officer gets spooked and everything happens. Driver did nothing wrong. In my opinion the officer was clearly in the wrong and should have been convicted.
If we were allowed to carry and I decided to (Canadian) - when pulled over I would open the driver's window, shut off my vehicle, put both hands on the steering wheel and when the officer got to my window inform him I had a firearm. I would not remove my hands from the steering wheel until HE told me what he wanted me to do next.
What if he had just asked you for you identification?
Meow, you're right, you don't have to, but many gun safety classes (which most responsible gun owners get before getting a license to carry and good stores make you take before buying) tell you to do exactly that.
mike haren but remember...he was BLACK gun owner...rules always seem to be different for those who look like us. Let me have been in that jury...we would be there ALL SUMMER LONG. #facts
In the state of Michigan it IS THE LAW to inform the officer that you are caring a concealed weapon during a traffic stop. Failure to do so can get you immediately arrested.
"I was worried about the little girl because I smelled marijuana" says the cop who then shot a gun into the car...with a little girl inside of it. Right.
also, he was saying that he was worried about the girl getting "second hand smoke". even he the guy was smoking weed in the car, to my knowledge the smoke doesn't hurt you? like i know that secondhand smoke from a cigarette is bad but thats completely different. his whole argument was BS. just because someone smokes marijuana doesn't mean they're a murderer.
7 times too. Like, did he not receive training on shooting to incapacitate? The cop fucked up on several levels
This cop was in the wrong, but cops aren't trained to "shoot to incapacitate". No one that carries a gun for a profession is trained to do that, they are trained to shoot to eliminate threats. However, ill say this again this cop should obviously not be in a job that requires him to carry a weapon and I'm surprised that manslaughter wasn't the end outcome.
Marijuana smoke still causes cancer. While tobacco breaks down to more cancerous substances, marijuana smoke is a product of incomplete burning which also causes cancer.
Kinda hard to cite to my biology teacher. But I can try to look for it when I have the chance. Inhaling any type of smoke is dangerous. That's why for example when there's a fire, people die of CO poisoning. CO for example attatches itself to your red(?) bloodcells which makes it harder for the body to get oxygen. I might go ahead and message him to ask where he got that info, but knowing that my teacher is pretty young and pretty liberal, I doubt that he was just saying that as propaganda or whatever.
As a cop, if someone's says "I have a gun," and they don't say it in a threatening way, there's no reason to be scared. Castile was reaching for his ID that YOU asked for, and then was killed for it. This cop deserves life in prison.
Tbird1945 That was straight up murder!!!!! That guy has NO business being a cop. He pulled him over for a taillight out. Why was the cops gun even drawn?!?!?!
Tbird1945 i agree as someone who lives in Minnesota this is just terrifying
What should a person do if they informed the police about a firearm on them? Do they just wait until the officer gives further instruction and not go for their wallet?
+Tbird1945 you are seriously not thinking.
anyone who watches this video 20 times in 6 months like i have can see the cop did the right thing, philando tells the cop he has a gun, then INSTANTLY starts pulling something out of his back pocket.
Even if the gun was in the front like Diamond..the woman in the car said, THE COP DOESN'T KNOW WHERE THE GUN IS, NO ONE TOLD HIM, he smelled WEED, he sees they are smoking it around a small child and EVEN DIAMOND the woman in the fucking care said... ''the cop didn't know where the gun is'' or some shit like that..she said in the interview.
that makes this a clear cut case, the cop was like don't reach for it (WHOA WHOA STOP WHY IS HE REACHING INTO HIS BACK AREA...in the dark where i can't see shit.
- If you look online you see alot of people getting shot because the driver is reaching for something, even people who are just getting their pockets searched ...while standing in a parking-lot grab guns and shoot police in close range.
They could have been lying.... you also see several videos where a black male says IM NOT REACHING then shoots the cop in the chest 2 seconds later.
she said in the interview... after the shooting took place that the cop didn't know where the gun is, she knew..the cop was right... to shoot phil...because Phil SHOULD have told the cop where the gun was, the cop should have told Phil to step out of the car.. and let the cop take out the gun. Phil should have INSTANTLY told the cop where the gun is.
In my opinion that is why the cop got free, the woman admitted the cop didn't know where the gun was and Phil went reaching for his wallet right after telling the cop he has a gun.
I THINK< Phil did this himself... he was high..so his mind was working in overtime, i think Phil was doing suicide by cop.
Cops need to pay attention to body language... if you tell a cop you got a gun, then start reaching for .. an UNKNOWN item at an angle the cop can not see. (which once again, Diamond said the cop didn't know where the gun was)
However i do think the cop should have said ''WHOA WHOA WHOA< STOP MOVING, you are MOVING TOO FAST, i might just haff to pop one in you..if you make sudden movements with a gun in the car''
which i will admit is paraphrased and stolen from BadBoys2
Is he serious?! He worried about the safety of the little girl and then shot 7 rounds into the guy sitting in front of her? That is messed up logic.
They are trained to neutralise or incapacitate, and in a lot of cases killing is the most effective way of doing so.
On flat ground it is possible to use the "shoot them without killing, then disarm them" method, but it's more risky.
Mark Silla *"Is he serious?!"*
No, of course not. He's lying. It's a stupid, ridiculous lie he concocted to justify his horrid, unjustifiable misconduct.
As much as I hate people taking every death of a black person by police as permission to run out in the streets and disrupt order, the evidence and situation provided from multiple angles shows us that he was 100% cooperative with the officer and the officer acted out of pure unjustified fear. How that officer got away with abusing his power to fire at a man astounds me. There is no justice here and now we are left with a family and community forever scarred by a senseless death, may this case forever be an example of abuse of power.
yeah. i called bullshit on the michael brown story but this time the evidence is pretty clear this was the cop's fault
Rainman Slim or nature's fault since I would also shoot someone if I thought they were going to shoot me.
King_David_._ good thing you're not a cop, then. A citizen with a concealed carry license is *required* by law to state they have a firearm, which he did. If that cop was actually aware/functional enough to understand it, it would have been a normal traffic stop
Well, its best not to grab at your pocket while saying you have a gun. And if he had stopped when the officer told him to, instead of saying "I'm not, I'm not", he would be alive.
Rainman Slim Every conceal carry course teaches you to keep your hands on the steering wheel until the cop asks you for your wallet and license. Cop who knows you are armed says "dont reach for it!" you dont move. Do what the cop says for his/her safety and your own. I rarely carry (even though I have a permit), and still I don't reach for things until instructed to do so. After watching the video, he said "don't pull it out!" three times. After the first time he asks, STOP. Put your hands up, and wait for instruction. Of course, its hard to think clearly when your smoking weed in a car, while driving, with a little girl in the car.
"Lol this guy smokes weed I bet he's gonna kill me".
The cop is horribly incompetent, at best.
Ignoring my personal opinions about gun ownership, I do not think the American police are given enough training. I don't think this cop really wanted to kill anyone, I think he didn't have the mental tools given to him through training to handle it and assess the risk correctly.
And yeah, weed smokers are really not the ones to worry about. I note some of the defence was "he wasn't obeying requests because he was stoned" but in that video we can hear that he did respond and answer clearly.
Sigh. Another person who should be alive isn't, and a cop has to live with that guilt forever because he wasn't trained.
i'd bet that was a lie.
Yeah, he might be incompetent, he might be a killer, he could be a POS, but he did not say what you are suggesting.
The weed simply further formed his idea of the person he was dealing with. Most certainly not in favor of that black guy.
I realize officers have a tough job. BUT, his testimony makes no sense to me. Why be concerned for the child and girlfriend with the marijuana smell (that could have been smoked prior, without the child around) but shoot this man SEVEN times? And he got acquitted. Makes no sense. From now on that little girl is going to be afraid of officers because of this incident. Because one of them shot her father when he was informing him of his firearm.
It's good for blacks to fear cops. Thinking like royalty gets too many of them today treating cops like defiant royal subjects who must be forced to genuflect to the royal *BLAK* ass hats. That's how Michael Brown treated the store owner he robbed and how he then treated Officer Darren Wilson *IN DA STREETZ.*
So whites should fear cops then?
HappyStance Eightable are you fucking stupid
HappyStance Eightable aww. You're so sad.
WHAT IS THIS Yeah, he is. Probably won't admit to it though.
I personally would love to be paid "only" 300000 dollars :D
DreamyRita yea but wonder woman has made over 700 million in the global box office thus far. 300k compared to 700million isnt that much
Anastasia. But money and lots of it. I wouldn't complain if I got 300k.
pay gap = millionaires wanting even more money.
for a job they did.
buzzfeed is such a wealth of fiction lol
Okay
Giovanny Martinez what does that have to do with anything? you don't ask someone that, it's just outright rude..
"A wealth of fiction"- nice metaphor
minecraftsheep31 Click on Mr. Not That Famous's Profile to answer your question.
Mr Not That Famous weren't you just on Chris Rayguns comment section?
The thought that anyone gets their news from Buzzfeed is depressing.
btbrotherton I had an English teacher that told our whole class how BuzzFeed is actually reliable.
Agreed!
No argument there.
The thought that 10s of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of people get their news from buzz feed is depressing...
I think the department did the right thing firing this guy. Being a police officer is a massive responsibility, requiring that you keep a level head and make smart choices with very little heads-up. Someone who can't keep calm in a situation shouldn't be given the authority to uphold the law.
Sigh...There isn't a fiber in my body that believes this officer work up that morning wanting to kill someone, and I believe this event will haunt him for the rest of his life - but from my perspective it is clear the officer was scared and made a mistake. A mistake which cost a man his life, and a family their father. In my mind part of becoming an officer involves coming to grips with the fact that you will be held to a higher standard, that you will be put in life threatening situations, and that you will be held accountable for your actions. I'm so sick of seeing police officers getting away with assault and murder. They signed up for the risks and the scrutiny that goes along with it, but are being held to a lower standard of conduct than any citizen would be in similar situations...just disgusting.
Mike Dergance Couldn't have said it better myself they should be held to that higher standard if they kill an innocent person it's almost worse than murder because their duty it to protect the people
EXACTLY! Part of why we respect cops is that the ones who do their jobs well conduct themselves at a higher standard than the average person despite the dangerous situations they put themselves in.
For some reason, we've started getting this priority backwards, with many people seemingly deciding that BECAUSE he's a cop, he's allowed leeway and gets to be held at a lower standard.
Here's the thing. I hate that this happened but I'm not surprised because they're not being trained to be calm in all situations much like this guy wasn't. IT isn't fair to the cop, the victim or his family.
Mike Dergance i totally agree
In a lot of states there are laws known as "stand your ground" laws that allows any citizen to not be held accountable for "not choosing to walk away". Minnesota passed one of those not long ago.
Unlike a regular citizen the police officer do not have the option of "just leaving the situation" as part of their duty. By that they are already held to a higher standard because they can not leave the situation. This is particularly important because there are other people in the car and on the road, if he feels threatened and decides to let him off without ensuring that he is not a danger to himself, his passengers, or other people on the road, he has not done his duty.
His duty in that situation is very much an evaluation of Asimov's Zeroth Law.
A person under a stand-your-ground situation is evaluated in such a way that if the person could reasonably (from the information the person "defending" know) be a threat to the defendant (person shooting or family/friends by proxy) there and then, the situation is judged self-defence.
A police officer is evaluated on the threat to not just themselves, but also to other people (like hostages or bystanders) as is reasonable from the information available. I encourage people to read the transcripts court before forming opinions (I have done neither, by the way).
Another thing to note is that a person who has just killed or shot a police officer is more likely to harm other people than someone who has "killed or shot someone". This statistic has many reasons, but what to take from it is that: "If the victim is know to be a police officer it is more likely that there are more victims than if you didn't know the victim were a police officer" (this is a bayesian significance for those who want to look it up, it's really cool)
I think Yanez is in the wrong. He feared for his own life? He didn't want to shoot Castille? Then why shoot *seven times*?? And one of his defenses is that he was worried about the 5 yr old, but shoots a man in front of her?? That's more traumatic than marijuana.
Hannah M. Since when was marijuana traumatic?
Hannah M here is my issue.Why do cops feel the need to shoot to kill?Why can't cops be re-trained to just maim the person and not kill.What about tasers or pepper spray?Why shoot to kill everytime and to keep shooting once the person is down.There are so many alternatives then killing.I just find this all too common in America with cops.
Killme, I am not sure about your name, but something traumatic is more traumatic than something not traumatic. I think that is what he meant there.
Catherine Penney I don't condone what the cop did in this particular example, but these are my 2 cents to your question. Under timed and potentially dangerous situations, the complexity of responses and fine motor skills becomes limited. There's usually no time for "where do I aim", when your "opponent" has the initiative- the question becomes "Do I shoot or not shoot". Consider also the fact that "non-lethal" shots (typically limbs) are much smaller areas to aim at.
It did look like genuine fear to me, perhaps the guy was going to get the gun for the cop in a non malicious way or something and the cop shat himself.
Aren't police meant to be trained for situations like this? If an innocent man dies because a policeman panicked, you have to admit that it is a massive problem. The cop(whatever his name is) killed a man, accidentally or not, and that should be punished.
JK Cunnife2072 Even you fail missions immediately in Call of Duty if you kill civilians accidentally.
That cop must be punished.
Jiangzell Did you just relate Call of Duty to police shootings?
Existence is Pain No, but in MW2 you get to fight inside slum, and you'll likely kill civilian by accident when engaging with local gang, which will result a fail immediately for killing innocent civilians.
..."The cop pulled me over, and I feared for my life, so I shot him"....
(How does that sound?)
don't lie moron the video is right above you he had a gun he said he had a gun which provoked a officer who was already spooked
XxcrazyjayxX i believe Kenny Mac was trying to say, how ridiculous and unbelievable would it be if the person pulled over had shot the officer and used that as their reasoning, like the cop used in his testimony. the citizen would never be acquitted in that situation.
Politiekman You are incorrect officer. It varies from state to state. Please educate yourself. For example in my state, as a permited ccw holder, I am NOT obligated to inform the officer during a routine stop.
FYI: concealednation.org/2015/07/do-you-have-a-duty-to-inform-when-carrying-concealed-we-look-at-all-50-states-for-the-answers/
XxcrazyjayxX Do people that intend on shooting an officer, tell the officer that they have a gun? No, it would put him at a disadvantage. The police officer overreacted.
Makes me sick to my stomach that the officer would blatantly lie about being scared for the passengers because of the weed smell, then he gets off very easily just because he was a scared cop. The cops in thhese incidents, continue to protect themselves and only themselves in these situations and it baffles me
If you look at the officers right hand in the video, the moment that Castile informs him he was in possession of a weapon the officer reached for his side arm. While I do agree some could argue this was a cautionary move, I would argue why would a man with the intention of firing on an officer reveal he is armed before striking, it just doesn't make any sense to me.
Ultimately I would say this comes down to a person lacking the correct discipline to handle a high stress environment on a daily basis. I feel as though while the officer should face punishment for manslaughter, I do believe the state is to be blamed for failing to provide sufficient training and testing for the officers in their employment.
The state can never guarantee that the officers in their employment will never cave in to the stress, but when an officer fires 7 rounds into a man at almost point blank range in front of his partner and child during a minor traffic violation then the state need to reevaluate their training.
Anyone else have any thoughts on the matter?
drivers intentions and his words are irrelevant, when you have a gun, thats first thing you say to officer with your hands on the wheel, and wait for his instructions, look for the videos of cops shot during routine controls like that, its just blink and cop fall on the road dead. those videos never made the news but cops are very aware of it and fear their lives. its very unfortunate tragic situation, but could very easily be avoided.
True, but wouldn't you agree 7 rounds is in excess of what was 'needed', he had no intention of wounding the 'suspect' that was shooting with the intent to kill which I can never agree with in a situation like this.
I don't care how "understandable" a mistake is, when the price is life you get held accountable. You have an American citizen do literally everything legally required of him and being entirely reasonable being gunned down in the next couple of seconds. I'm being told to be thankful we're not North Korea meanwhile breaking no law seems to be a death sentence on the street since you cam die based on a cop's feelings. Your irrational fear for your own life shouldn't deprive me of mine
Lamprey I agree with everything you said and I have to compliment you on how you worded this.
Lamprey I couldn't have said in any better
Two things bother me about these Philando comments:
1.) The cop says he stopped the car for a "robbery suspect." It turns out it was a "broken break light." Now flash back before this incident. Philando was repeatedly harassed by the cops. He was stopped 49 times in 13 years. These stops never resulted in a major infraction. When will people acknowledge that this cop, like presumably the 48 other cops before him, racially profiled this man? Is there any white person in the U.S that has been stopped by police more than 4 times a year for over a decade?
2.) What bothers me is that (10:24) he says to the cop "I wasn't.." and shortly after the both Philando and the girlfriend responds to make sure the cop heard him. So at the point the cop shot, the man was reaching for anything. This is sickening.
Marie Sanders except the cop that killed Philando was also a minority.
+ItsTimeToStop!!!! Now!!! Minoritys can be really racist. My mother is Asian And she hates Black People
Antiblackness is global and not exclusive to White people.
Marie Sanders It happens a lot to white people.
My friend was pulled over 3 times in a two week window for tiny infractions because he has gotten into trouble in the past. They are hoping to get a big arrest again on him.
1.) Seems like a frivolous point. Seems in the video he said he was concerned as it looked liked like a robbery suspect not that he was stopped for that. 49 times in 13 years seems a lot until you realize that's 49 times in 4745-4759 days. Since when has being stopped a bunch and not receiving a major infraction a show of anything? Sounds so scary...every 3 months he gets stopped and a minor infraction or warning...scary. Also I'm going to point out that making that pathetic of a declaration is weak...you are talking 4 minor infractions a year which I wouldn't be surprised to see people at 100+ over a decade. Although it would depend on the infraction as they would probably lose their license before that if it was anything notable.
The cop is guilty.
bullshit, he didnt know where the gun was, Diamond the women said so.
and right after Phil said he had a gun in the car, he was trying to pull something out, i think this is suicide by cop, actually.
The cop smelled they were smoking weed around a little girl, the cop had every right to assume the unknown object he was reaching for was a gun, look at all the videos of black men who shoot cops.. they are found reaching when the cop says stop reaching.
This is the exact moment that gets men cops and black men killed, Phil should have known better than to reach suddenly and not tell the cop where the gun was and..he should have asked the cop, what do you need me to do sir?
Ecchi Version Of Liquid you had to make it a black men thing. Cops have a right to shoot any white people with guns. Look at all the white people who go on shooting sprees. They all have guns on them when they do it
I am not sad that an innocent black man was killed but rather that an innocent man was killed. I do not believe all cops are inherently evil, but this officer clearly needs to be held responsible. His penalty is far less damaging than it would be if I was running that courtroom
I'm usually on the side of police, but this is bullshit. He didn't give proper commands, panicked and murdered someone
yeah same, I'm usually the first to wait for the full story because the media often depicts these things wrong. I waited and waited on this one but... yeah looks like just a god awful police officer and a wrongful shooting.
Yeah, this was one and Walter Scott in South Carolina (The guy who got shot in the back)... Those 2 really bother me. Daniel Shaver of Arizona, Daniel Saenz of El paso, and Dillon Taylor of Salt Lake were also bullshit. Daniel Saenz was actually the worst. He was handcuffed and in a police facility.
Who else hates buzzfeed???
Pickdroppers you already know the answer
They are the worst cancer that ever cancered
I only like some of BuzzFeed's videos and I do some of their quizzes once in a while (because I do not have literally anything better to do). I do not think that it should be thought of as a legitimate news source.
You're donating the profits to Children's Hospital? THAT'S AMAZING!
renragged Ikr, He's so awesome and so thoughtful.
I know I might get a lot of flak for this, but what I heard in that Castille video was this...
Castille: "Sir, I have to tell you I DO have a firearm on me."
Officer: "Ok, don't reach for it then."
Castille: "I, I'm, I was reaching for it."
Officer: "Don't pull it out."
Castille: "Ima hafta pull it out."
Officer: "DON'T PULL IT OUT!!"
I ran the video 10+ times just listening to the audio through my headphones with my eyes closed, and that is what I heard every time.
After that, the officer reaches in to (presumably) stop Castille's hand from reaching for something while also drawing his own weapon with his other hand, it hits the side of the vehicle as he draws it, pulling it downward (which to a body hyper-focused on survival may have felt like it was being grabbed by someone.) and away from what he was sensing as a threat.
IDK, the Jury were given all the different videos with no transcript, so they could only really go on what THEY heard and saw. If I were in the Jury, I don't know if I could have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt either.
Not claiming he is innocent, just that the burden of proof is on the accuser, not the accused. A video where I hear something differently than someone else does, falls well within reasonable doubt.
I feel like Phillip is the only real news outlet.
anyone else?
Swiftuts same
What? No. There's plenty of good news outlets, and Philly D is FAR from perfect (Phil has reported false/misleading news stories before himself). I consider Philly D to be around the same level as say, The Washington Post, in terms of trustworthiness. He's alright.
Skyrim Guard maybe hes just the only one I pay attention to XD
Swiftuts philip*
Dear Phil,
On your last video you shared an awesome link to an awesome video, of a guy cleaning a rusty knife.
After watching that video, I was recommended to watch a Bob Kramer video on proper knife sharpening, which led me to another video of Anthony Bourdain featuring Bob Kramer, which introduced me to a wonderful series called "Raw Craft".
I spent the next 2 hours watching amazing people do amazing things and it inspired me.
All thanks to your 1 link recommendation.
In the words of little Trae, that is amazing! :) Thank you
DIEGOVISTA holy shit, I did almost the exact same thing! weird that I both read this comment and checked out that link, given that I rarely go for the links, but Phil seemed so emphatic about it. rightly so!
if you want to watch good vids like that, search up the channel "jimmydiresta"
DIEGOVISTA I don't know if you saw this, but on Jun's channel, he sharpens a 1$ knife if you were interested in watching that too. I love his videos because they're super calming and the cats are adorable lol. Have an awesome day :)
Yeah I actually saw he did one that cost him a dollar!! Watch Bob Kramer's Raw Craft with Anthony Bourdain, he shows how makes a master kitchen knife. Shit was therapeutic AF! lol
I will! Thanks for the suggestion :)
Jennifer Lawrence was at the time "the far biggest star" in American Hustle? What? In a movie with Christian Bale, Bradley Cooper and Amy Adams???
disnamenotavailable I guess it's a matter of opinion but yes I'd consider her more famous than those guys
disnamenotavailable of
+Mairead Maguire
Bradley Cooper and Bale were bigger than her at that time.
Bigger than Bale?
Do you like Huey Lewis and the News?
Salaries aren't the same as wages lol
MegaEpic KiwiMaster of
I call BS on the "I feared for the little girls life story". If you actually feared for her life you wouldn't fire 7 shots at such a close proximity to her. A gunshot wound is a whole heck of a lot worse than "second hand marijuana"
R T Not to mention, if he smelled marijuana he should've inquired about it. Just how officers ask drunk drivers that they pull over if they've been drinking, if he smelled marijuana he should've asked about it.
Go Face First if a officer smells marihuana they have the right to search the car,sooo his whole approach could have been handled differently
One of the bullets actually went in the backseat behind Castille. The daughter was luckily behind her mother's seat. If she wasn't, she would likely be dead too.
You ask for the insurance and wallet first. I allows you to see if they have the motor skills to do that. If the person fumbles and cant give the items you asked then it is another reason to ask them about drinking or drugs. Also it can give you a reason to ask them to exit the vehicle to run field tests.
I have heard many stories of officers asking for a DL and the person hands them a credit card.
vapidreaper That's what i was saying? If he was so concerned about smelling marijuana, he should've addressed it.
"I was worried about the little girl because he was smoking in front of her."
So he thinks smoking marijuana in front of a kid is extremely dangerous and shows that he is reckless, yet shooting 7 rounds into the car the kid is sitting in, and killing her dad, is not dangerous or reckless?
I don't think you understand how guns work.
See, they go in straight lines and officers receive this thing called training so they know how to aim.
The chances of hitting anyone in the back seat were literally 0.
Please, if you don't know jack about guns, don't talk.
*Who cares about who got paid what! It's none of their damn business in the first place!*
SEVEN TIMES!? He shot that guy Seven f*cking times!? Because he THOUGHT he had a gun?! WTF is wrong with these people?! There was a little girl inside the f*cking car!
Hey Phill, just wanted to thank you for choosing St Jude because I recently found out I have a brain tumor and I need surgery. I am 15 and live in Canada and I am coming to Lebohneur which is attached to St Jude. I will have surgery in the next month and I hope that you sell as many shirts as possible. Keep making amazing content and I hope you have a great day.
I'm buying a shirt for you, my friend. Best of luck in surgery.
Mason Alcorn Thanks I really do appreciate the support
I sincerely wish you the best in your surgery my friend, I know you'll make a quick and speedy recovery. Thank you for sharing your life with me and the community. You will recover.
Hell yeah! St. Jude is my favorite charity! Such great work!
*hugs* good luck! (>
How did that cop walk on those charges? Manslaughter is the unintentional killing of someone. The victim is dead, and the cop said that he didn't want to kill him. His logic was bullshit, the victim was complying, and the dashcam should have been the nail in the coffin. I really hope that the family sues for wrongful death and bankrupts the city and the cop himself. While I'm at it, I want to know why is it that these cops have such itchy trigger fingers. Is it that they can get away with it? Because these charges rarely stick? It's a sad day that we were held to a higher standard in an active warzone (Iraq) than cops patrolling our own streets are.
Arthritic Penguin one of the jurors has family in law enforcement and openly stated that it would be hard for them to rule against the cop.
I disagree. It may be true that the officer intentionally killed someone, but he didn't have much time to make a choice. Philando literally told the officer that he had a firearm, which alone should have alerted Yanez into putting his finger on the trigger. He reached down to his waist, and that could've been his gun he was reaching for. If he didn't pull the trigger, then it could've been Philando that fired. The dashcam only helps a little, because it doesn't show what happens in the car.
Arthritic Penguin, although I, like most people, don't think he was, you really can't say for sure that philando WASNT reaching for the gun. It was fully loaded and in his one of his pockets. There are plenty of crazy people who would tell a cop that they have a gun on them right before reaching for it. (Especially if the person is intoxicated). Remember the officer didn't have the luxury of knowing all the facts or the time to think about the decision. That's just reality. I think it's callous to say he belongs in prison. But he definitely doesn't belong on the force.
Ryan Cowan I think this is a very reasonable statement.
It's very tough for both sides of the argument because I can see how easily a cop could get injured in a situation like this (and a gun can be pulled and shot in a very short amount of time) but also how the cop seemed hasty and a bit jumpy (things that can hurt you as a police officer or save you depending on the situation)
I'm sorry, but that is complete apologist bullshit. You clearly are misinformed about CCW stipulations, but if you cannot react sensible and not blasting away with you're own gun when you stop someone who LEGALLY has the paperwork in place to carry their own firearm, then you should not be a police officer or in any high stress position, period.
The police officer is legally and morally wrong, and the legal system failed Philando and his family.
That guy wasn't in the right mindset, usually police officers are not fearing their lives when they pull over someone, yeah they're cautious and all but wtf is this?!?! And what if that you smelled weed, that doesn't make anyone a fucking cop killer. Why you gotta put 7 rounds into an innocent man, who was decent enough to inform you about having a firearm on him...??? Outrageous, that "officer" deserves jail time...
So he thought the girl and women is in danger in those split seconds before firing. Awesome BS.
In my opinion, all Philando did was right. He was polite, and did everything that was asked, and informed the policeman. This officer jumped to conclusions and killed a man because of this. And he needs to be held responsible for this.
Val Sit No, you don't reach into your pockets after an officer tells you not to reach, that's 100% in the fucking wrong
@Vevo he didn't give him enough time to stop that was a SPLIT SECOND he told him not to reach for his gun.
MrMosbyOfficial VEVO what? The officer asked him for his license and registration. And he told him he wasn't reaching for the gun
The officer said not to pull out his gun, he also asked for Castille's ID, he didn't say stop pulling out your ID which is why Castille told him he wasn't pulling out his gun.
The officer even said in his testimony that he was already "fearing for his life" because of a bunch of stupid shit that he made up in his head. He was clearly in the wrong and had no reason to blast the dude 7 times.
+ApplesauceCat It's called lying
buzzfeed is the embodiment of the child that was a mistake
Beebo dont compare me to buzzfeed
Beebo that's an insult to child mistakes
Pretty sure like 70% of kids were mistakes. Jus saying. #oopsGang
Beebo hot username. Hot forehead.
Beebo I don't think you know what embodiment means.
I am a conceal/carry holder in MN. In order to qualify for this, all persons are required to take a lengthy instruction class which includes safety, laws, and handling of firearms. One of the most emphasized instructions in the class is, if you are pulled over and are in possession of your concealed firearm, you are to keep your hands on the steering wheel in full view of the officer, and inform him/her that you have a conceal/carry license, that you are in possession of your weapon, and inform the officer of the location of that weapon. You are NEVER to move for your wallet, weapon, ANYTHING, until the officer has cleared you to do so.
Are we watching the same video? The officer clearly told him to stop. "Don't pull it out." That means you should probably stop reaching for whatever you're reaching for. It doesn't really matter if it's your wallet.
Also seriously, buy a dash-cam if you are scared of police doing this. Stop pretending like there isn't a relatively cheap solution to this if it is actual police abuse or racism.
Are you justifying the killing of the driver by saying that the driver didn't have the presence of mind to know exactly what to do in order to not get shot?
I sure am. If "didn't have the presence of mind to know exactly what to do" means being able to follow specific, easy to understand instructions that any functioning adult needs to be able to follow. The officer even sounds scared, "Don't pull it out."
Obviously this is a bit questionable for some area that hasn't had a police shooting in some time, but it's unsurprising with the state of police and crime in our country these days.
Freedom of speech means freedom of speech.
MegSongsBad not anymore sadly, to liberals it means "freedom of speech(unless it offends me)" true freedom of speech went out the window a long time ago.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH MEANS FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!
MegSongsBad but it also means you accept responsibility for what you say
If I tell "fire" in a crowded movie theater, freedom of speech ain't gonna protect me from legal problems
@ SparkyMist --- I wouldn't say all liberals, or even all conservatives. It seems that now a days everyone just wants to shut down other peoples opinions. Whether because of offense, or just disagreement.
The case was actually interesting. It wasn't necessarily about freedom of speech, but about the ability to trademark what could be considered offensive language. You can call your band the mot offensive shit imaginable, but the case was about whether you can get that name trademarked and protected.
On Gal Gadot v. Henry Cavill: Buzzfeed shouldn't even be called a "news outlet" for Christ's sake. The blunder on their part and on others' really ends up hurting the case that there may actually be a difference in salary between male and female actors, such as the one Phil mentioned with Jennifer Lawrence in American Hustle.
On the SC ruling: I think the Redskins are a different situation because the owners don't give a shit about Native Americans nor their heritage. Legality aside, it should be up to the oppressed group to determine when and how to re-appropriate things previously classified as hatred.
On the shooting: Often for people it's all or nothing. Every death of a black person by a police officer is justified or a hate crime. I'm with Phil in that I think there is some wiggle room. This one is an atrocity and that officer should be behind bars. That video should have been more than enough evidence to convict.
on the SC ruling:
You're literally arguing in favour of racial discrimination.
Only people in X category are protected under X law.
Where do you draw the line?
What does "oppressed group" even mean?
Does that mean Obama doesn't get a say in issues pertaining to black people & "hate speech"? (can we really argue a POTUS is oppressed? What about all the multi millionaires claiming status as "oppressed minorities"?)
Seems to me a small number of cynical people try to manipulate these issues for personal gain.
Either free speech applied to everyone, or it aint free speech.
Either the law applies to everyone equally, or it's discriminatory.
Perhaps it would have happened differently if Yanez gave clearer and more direct orders. "Put your hands on the steering wheel." Instead of, "Don't pull it out." With that in mind, please don't get mad at cops who order you around. The good ones do it for your safety.
Phil, 2 things. 1. "that's amazing" might be the cutest thing ever. 2. be way to raise your kid the right way. You set a hell of an example! 100% goes to a very good cause. This is one of the many reasons I follow You!
h3h3 and Defranco tag team upload against Buzzfeed?? Fuck yeahhhhhhhh!!!
Today was a good day in UA-cam lol
Moe Rahman go away
Robin Sparkles cry.
fuck buzzfeed
Moe Rahman h3h3 did a comedy video. He didn't make it to push any agendas (yes Ethan has made anti buzz feed videos in the past) but that video was made for comedic purposes. Just saying
As it applies to Castille, we should put all the other stuff aside (blue lives or blm). Facts are, Castille informed the officer he had a firearm and did his duty as a responsible gun owner. The cop freaked out and shot him, in cold blood. The recordings show this. The fact that he wont be held accountable undermines the notions that cops protect and serve, as well as the notuin that the justice system will work for the people. Everyone loses in this situation, the family, the force, the community....only the cop maybe benefits from this (who will get a glorified severance package and he will likely find another job in another city or county).
Justin Hinckley If a cop tells you not to reach for something 3 times you listen to him it is as simple as that.
He was trying to get his ID.
Yare Yare Daze Y A R E Y A R E D A Z E What were you watching? He did not appear to go for it. He appeared to hand him his information, like from a glove box where a gun might also be held. Also, the cop appeared to be hostile and frightened, reacting and not acting. If your point is we should follow cops orders, then thats what he did. If your point is that he did not, it is impossible to say one way or another. However, events dont happen in a capsule, we see Castille do what a responsible gun owner does, inform the officer. The question we should be asking is in a world where gun owners carry on their personal vehicle does this even complicate the notion that one should say anything, at all? Does informing the police create a hostile environment and engender violent outcomes in the first place. Cause ithats what happended in the moment the officer freaked out.
Yare Yare Daze Y A R E Y A R E D A Z E he was reaching for his wallet, because the cop asked for it. even if your point wasn't complete garbage, a man is dead and a daughter is traumatized for life with no father because of a broken tailight and having a gun you're allowed to carry under the second amendment.
if you're scared of a man with a daughter and a gf in the car after he INFORMS YOU HE IS ARMED (think about it, why would someone want to harm you and warn you of the threat in advance) then you SHOULD NOT BE A COP. find another job.
Yare Yare Daze Y A R E Y A R E D A Z E he didn't reach for it smart one, he even said he wasn't reaching for it.
Hi there Philip, not really sure if you're ever going to read this comment, but I wanted to take the time and say that I think you're doing something great here. Talking about current issues that should be talked about, is important and has been greatly missing from my life in the last couple of years. You just brought that back to me. Thanks a lot!
THAT'S AMAZING! Bought my shirt. Glad to be supporting St. Jude.
The 1st amendment isn't there to protect your feelings
You're right it's there so if you are offended you can freely express it.
but at what point does it become slander and hate speech?
LiChai Epperson When you purposefully tell lies in order to undermine someone's integrity/social/economic livelihood. There is no such thing as hate speech; bullying- yes, hate speech- no.
hate speech is still freedom of speech, no matter how you look at it.What isn't protected is speech that directly tell people to be violent, and slander.
shapeshiftingpedro I don’t know about in the US, but in Canada we define hate speech as just that: speech that promotes hate “All black/white people should die” is an example of hate speech, along with anything else that is promoting hate of a certain race/sex/religion/etc. The reason it can show up on the internet is that as much as we don’t like hate speech, we hate censorship more, and people have the freedom of expression
Who in the hell trusts BuzzFeed? Why do they have so many fans
Arron Tolan SJWs, 3rd Wave Feminists and a bunch of people who "goes with the flow" and doesn't think rationally/logically.
Arron Tolan welll, their existence don't offend me. Their news is unwatchable, but I like their UA-cam videos and so I like them.
That cop video was terrifying. Can you imagine going to the market with your family and then getting stopped by cops and getting shot because the cop that stopped you was inept and scared? Now that little girl will grow up without a dad and thinking "the cops killed my daddy." Unfortunate. Sad. Horrible.
There is no reason he should get away with this. He was clearly telling him "I'm not reaching for it" but the officer kept interrupting him and clearly making Castille shaky. On top of that, there is no reason to shoot a man 7 times. This was cold blooded murder from an arrogant cop and he deserves the same punishment as a citizen gunning down a man.
About the Gal Gadot - Henry Cavil issue, I really think fake news are fond of putting a narrative first before facts. This is their way of getting attention and more traffic, which I think is so lame, misleading and misinforming the public. And I hate their bad habit of indirect retracting of their intentionally erroneous headlines with statements like "despite what you've heard..." instead of "despite what you initially heard from us..."
Creative North Yet there are still so many people who believe in these fake news and wanna-bes.
Creative North FFN - Fuck Fake News
Creative North That's true, and those irresponsible social media freaks are so fast in spreading fake news just to get attention on their Twitter and other accounts. Idiots.
People don't really care how much these actors get paid, but about the entertainment they give. Jackals like these fake news and attention-hungry social media personalities are the ones spreading wrong information to make sensational issues that stir up peoples' peaceful minds.
I don't think that is completely true. I did care when Jennifer Lawrence wasn't paid equally to her male co-stars in American Hustle. As Phil pointed out that it was bullshit because she was basically the biggest star in that movie at the time and her performance was equal to the other costars of the movie. She deserved equal pay for that role and eventually got it. That should have been done from the beginning.
A majority of US police are good but this incident was a result of improper training. Though I don't believe the officer shot Castile out of malice, I do believe the punishment (there was none) doesn't fit the crime. I don't believe the officer deserves something like a life sentence, but being acquitted results in distrust between police officers and the community. There has to be some sort of consequence for an action like this, even if its something like new training programs for officers.
The guy got basically fired by the city after the court found him not guilty, that count as punishment?
WhiskeyHound not really because he should be in prison
+WhiskeyHound No not really because he's been amicably let go and they're helping get another good job so its not really a punishment. At least he should have it on his record he murdered someone.
WhiskeyHound the other guy lost his life this guy lost his job and dodged prison because 'merika
we can't just label offficers as "good" or "bad".
these are humans doing their jobs.
humans are flawed, humans can be confused and humans can make mistakes, that doesn't make them good or bad, that makes that specific action good or bad.
I don't know...I didn't read the entire case, maybe there is another issue going on about his mental health? Not that I want to justify what he did, but we really only see a fraction of what truly happened, I find how this is put very unjustified too.
like...he fears a man with marihuana near a kid, but goes on to shoot that man 7 times near that same fucking kid?
I don't understand it.
But to come back to the officers claim you made:
it's really not that easy, they have the job to enforce the law. the law is a system that intends to protect individuals. therefore, it's not so easy to tell when it's ok to enforce a law and when not, because in some situations the law stops serving it's purpose.
We have people with a responsibility, therefore they're the only ones we CAN blame.
doesn't mean we should blame them. I just think it's obvious that with more cops, therea are going to be more of bad cases, and on the opposite side, how many times do we report about cases where an officer with a gun did absolutely everything right?
I guess you're right about improving the education for these cops.
Horrible, he said he wasn't reaching for it and the cop kept interrupting him not allowing him to explain. If he thought he may have been in danger he should've retreated away from the car and warned his partner before firing a gun. If you have a weapon able to take a life you should have a much better reason to pull it out.
That shirt is amazing
Brown_Purring_Cow wow that's amazing
The more I think about this issue the more I become a free speech absolutist.
Above all, I don't want there to be any excuse for the censoring of the free exchange of ideas on the Internet.
I'm in the same boat. I wish there was some nuanced way to censor lies and misinformation but the more I hear about freedom of speech cases the more it seems like the only way to fight misinformation is with more information.
This shines a light on the problem that is police training.
As for the the freedom of speech issue, I agree with the ruling. Freedom of Speech is exactly that, though it's not freedom from scrutiny or criticism. The Redskins and the Slants can have their names all day long, and everyone has the right if they so choose to criticize their choice in name. However, this doesn't mean we have the right to censor just because we find it offensive or feel it's inappropriate.
100% goes to St. Jude's!!! You are a great man.
Who is going to police the police???? I know being a cop is one of the hardest jobs and cops deserve more respect, but if someone who wasn't a cop accidentally shoots and kills someone else, would they just get off? No, they wouldn't
maybe people in usa should just be taught on a driving license exam to not reach for anything after you tell cop you carry a gun, and wait for his explicit instructions on how to proceed. this would eliminate situations like that
maybe police should have better training and have a stringent hiring process , that would eliminate situations like this
Definitely agree on that they get off on things way more often than the should. It's a tough situation though.
As a police officer or anyone that does a job long enough, you start seeing things in a very focused way outside of what a mainstream person would do in that same situation.
Like I'm a straight guy that dates women. So I know the problems in dating women more than I know the problems of a woman that dates men. I only know me and my guy friends which are going to be somewhat similar to myself.
It's hard to know just what police see that a regular person wouldn't get as twitchy about. They likely see way more messed up things than a regular person would assume they would see.
Not saying the officer was correct or not, just that it is hard from an outsider point of view to know what's going on in their minds.
EDIT: From that video and audio though, it looks like the officer totally bungled that and that guy died for that officers massive failure in reasoning and self control. :/
MadRespeck Who watches the watchmen.
100% agree,the officer responded irrationally to the situation. Castile had not shown any signs of hostility but cooperating with Yanez in this situation. Not only did the officer kill an innocent man but put in danger two other innocents and he should face much harsher consequences than what he has received.
Ay my man you play dokkan
PokemonInMyPokeGamez Hell yea lol
This is not a onetime thing to wave off, it is sickening and needs to be dealt with head on.
He didn’t “make a mistake”. It is a dangerous mindset, thinking the person is dangerous because of the colour of their skin, having decided beforehand the outcome of the situation.
I don't think that if you can be so easily spooked then you have no place being in the police force. Especially if you assume everyone is constantly pulling out guns.
there is an earnings gap, but not a wage gap for most jobs in the USA and the world. Entertainment gets a little funky because pay is based on expected crowd draw rather than quality of performance.
Correct and I would say that entertainment is not a good example of the wage gape because theirs way to many factors (production quality, hundreds of people working on it) critical reception is also a factor.
Yes but like Phil said Jennifer Lawrence was paid a lot less then her male counterparts despite being hands down the most popular and well know actress/or in the movie.
Egypt Lastname then she screwed up when she negotiated her contact
+RambleOn07
That's what I would go to next rather than jumping to the sexist narrative. I don't understand why people want to believe that everyone is some form of hardline bigot
And did she work fewer hours than her co stars? Number of hours worked actually does matter, as far as earnings.
BREAKING NEWS: Buzzfeed is fake news.
In other obvious news: The sky is blue, water is wet, and the sun is hot.
Carry on.
DaSpooge in other news Republicans are white :>
Nonbinary Child {they/them} Except, y'know, the non-white ones.
Nonbinary Child {they/them} #notall except when it's people I disagree with.
Nonbinary Child {they/them} in other news, Democrats are child killers
DaSpooge it's a joke nigga
I feel sorry for the officer, but he did make a mistake and should go to prison for it. If I was him, I would go to prison willingly for killing an innocent man.
geronimo why do you feel sorry for him?
I don't think he wanted to kill that man. He overreacted and now everyone hates him.
geronimo Mhm, you sure would own up to your actions. Yep, what a saint you are.
Hiroman. You are probably right, but sure as hell would feel a lot of remorse. I would still prefer to be with my family.
Wooowww what a great person you arree. Easy to say a "what if" situation without any real consequences, huh?
To be honest as a CC license holder when I've been pulled over I've informed the officer and kept my hands on the wheel and asked for clear instructions before ever moving my hands. Once a officer knows I have a firearm it is absolutely imperative that I don't reach for anything.
He deserved to go to jail for what he did. The guy literally said I have a gun, informing the officer, and he panicked and shot him multiple times. Does not deserve to walk free. I don't think it was racially motivated but when people see these kind of cases with the victim being a black man, AND the officer walking free like nothing happened, I'm not surprised that people riot and don't trust the police.
The Blue gang never looses
TheKnowledgeSeeker but just because you say you have a gun doesn't automatically make you friendly. He could just be tricking him to think that
TheKnowledgeSeeker My thoughts exactly. The police officers that any state employs are supposed to be held to a higher standard. They are given a responsibility: to protect and serve, if a coo is not going to approach a situation with a calm and level head whilst *armed* then they should not be charged woth the protection of civilian lives. If you are going to panic when someone calmly informs you they are in possession of a gun (and why else would they tell you if they didn't possess it legally) then you should not be a cop. End of story
You hear the officer repeat "Dont reach for it" about 5 times, each with increased alertness, finally opening fire. From that, the safe deduction is that the guy was reaching for his pockets, probably to get his ID.
The cop was scared, so he opened fire.
Wile it is easy to blame the guy in hindsight, there are instances were the driver will pull out a gun and shoot the cop.
The people that had the best information presented to them were the Jurors, who decided he was innocent and his actions were justified. Unless some ulterior motive is presented, it would be Naive for you to claim you know better.
TheKnowledgeSeeker
The guy literally said I have a gun
And the cop literally told him not to reach for it.
Again, and again.
And the guy literally reached for it anyway and said I have to pull it out.
Nobody needed to die, all the idiot had to do was follow instructions.
If you actually watched the video and heard the cop's reaction to killing a man you know he's not "walking free like nothing happened"
if the cop is so touchy that he shoots a man seven times because he *thought* he smelled weed, and he had a *legal* firearm, he should not be a cop. like you said, being a cop is a tough job, and i can only imagine the scary situations that come with it. but if you cant handle those situations without killing someone..... maybe that's not the job for you.
Jordan B why cant people be as smart as this commenter....
you know whats the problem is? In USA cops only train for 6 months. *In most modern countries, it's 3 years...*
undeadmaggot345 The city did decide that he was no longer unfit to be a police officer. It is just too bad that someone had to die for the department to realize it.
How exactly did the officer KNOW that he had a LEGAL fire arm. Just because he said "I have a fire arm" does not mean he was in legal possession of said fire arm.
The world would be a better place if all people had the same appreciation for facts as Phil and most of the audience here have. Thank you, for being a light in an ever more hysterically darkend time.
You're a good man, Philly D
Phil just one day I wanna see what happens if we dont "just jump into it"
FunkadelicPeach 😂😂😂
I had to read this 3 times before I died laughing
FunkadelicPeach One day we hopped right into it. I think it was an Easter.
you dont want to see that! all chaos breaks loose, nuclear rainbows shoot from the b-holes of ants, bunny rabbits become possessed and gnaw your house down to its foundation, freaking earthworms sprout legs and start humping your significant-other while koalas hold you down and make you watch. freaking earthworms and koalas man!
he would break a leg and joe has to host tps :p
I think the scariest thing about "The Slants" story is really how it show cases the lack of consistency in the American justice system. Their case was viewed by multiple different people and somehow ended up getting two drastically different answers over the course of time, and that's not even factoring in how the Red Skins have been fighting this battle for a while now and have managed to get different rulings as well. It really goes to show you that you just because you take something to court doesn't mean you'll get the "right" or "fair ruling" which is really the terrifying thing.
The system isn't perfect by any means, but at the moment it's probably the best we have
Well yeah, that's precisely why court decisions can be appealed all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Sadly there's a lot of leeway for interpretation in the law. Judges aren't always without bias and you may end up in court several times until you reach a reasonable judge. For the slants they had to go all the way to the supreme court to be heard.
+Cosmo1093 Well unfortunately, in some cases, you only get so many appeals, and not everyone has the luxury of taking their case all the way up to the supreme court. What about the countless people who have been convicted of murder and then 10 years later we find out their innocent? It's situations such as with The Slants that really show how that manages to happen.
Awesome charity work Phil! Keep being you!
That police interaction was absolutely ridiculous. I have never seen an overreaction as insane as this. The victim was being as safe as possible and that coward went trigger crazy. A life needlessly gone, a father gone, and two lives scarred. Sad. We need better training and screening for police.
The video contradicts the officers testimony. The officer said that he pulled him over because Castile and Diamond matched a description but the other officer made no effort to identify Diamond. To me, I believe the officer lied to make sure he would have been acquitted. But this new video just further upsets me because a legal gun owner has done everything right and he was supposed to do but ends up getting killed for it. And the usually advocates for gun rights (The NRA) are no where to be found. This is something you'd expect them to campaign and fight for the death for. It truly saddens me that an innocent Black man was a victim of an officer who was poorly trained and it cost him his life.
Not that I'm disagreeing with you, but I don't believe he ever said he pulled them over because he matched the description.
allycookie2009 at 8:30, he stated that he thought Castile fit the description of a robbery suspect. If you pull someone over and then tell him why you are pulling him over, wouldn't you want to say you're also a suspect for a robbery as well and ask him to step out the vehicle? I'm not a lawyer nor a police officer but that seems a logical thought process.
Not sure it would be wise to tell him he is a suspect to a robbery, because lets say he actually was the robber, wouldn't he be more inclined to shoot? I think he figured he would just run his license. I don't know, not sure what police protocol for that would be.
The real problem in the Gal Gadot situation is that there are people taking buzzfeed seriously
OHHHH! OH! OHHHHHH!
+Jacob W because it has news in the title. I could start suckmybigbluedonkeydicknews.com and I'd probably be a credible source to some people.
America must be the only country where you can be given the death sentence for having a break light out.
I think this officer needs to serve time like everyone else is supposed to.
"If he followed his directions, maybe he wouldn't have gotten shot."
This isn't France in the 1700s, where simple infractions are punishable by death. *habeas corpus* is in the Constitution for a reason. No one deserves to die because of a misunderstanding!
When you tell a cop you have a gun, that changes the situation, doesn't matter if they asked for ID moments prior. Keep your hands out of your damn pockets until they search and make sure things are safe. Common sense.
Nothing to do with punishing. It's about eliminating the threat. You know that, but you're a dishonest person.
James Burgess
There are things he could have done differently to increase his likelihood of not being shot. Gun owners should take this under advisement.
However from everything I've seen so far the cop was wrong. I don't see any proof yet of racism or malicious intent. Just a dude that f*****-up in the heat of the moment and probably should never have been a cop, or at least have had better training and screening before going to the field.
I was once told by my parents that yes I have right away in a crosswalk but it's better to be alive than right.
Aaron Reichert I never said he was racist, I believe he got nervous and made a rash decision. But that doesn't excuse the fact that you need to pay the consequences for your actions. The police need to be as accountable (actually more) as the driver of the car.
James Biggar that's a valid point. There was a misunderstanding, but that doesn't dismiss that the cop killed someone, when it wasn't *necessary*. He should still be held accountable.
It seems to me that a person that society gives the privilege and responsibility of wielding a deadly weapon should be seriously accountable for what they do with that weapon. Society does not give police officers license to be executioners. I find the defense proffered by the officer to be wholly unacceptable. The man acted out of fear when no indicator of a frightful situation was present. That is a lapse of judgement with the most serious of consequences being the outcome. Thus the officer should be held responsible for that lapse and I believe his police department also bears blame for equipping a man who clearly was not ready for the responsibility he was given. Being a police officer is hard that is not in dispute but excusing poor or disastrous outcomes by simply stating the difficulty of a task is not a defense it is an excuse. The record in my opinion shows a man who was at the very least criminally negligent in executing his duties.
I thought he said "I'mma have to pull it out" so idk I think he was gonna give it to the police officer but I think the police officer definitely acted poorly by shooting him with out enough information to make a proper decision. but the officer jumped way too quickly because they said he's not pulling it out so this is crazy
I mean...when cops says, several times, "dont pull it out" with inceaseing tone..you just dont hapily start pulling out things from your pockets...you freeze and explain the situation that you are going for your ID...if you gonna tell a cop you are carrying a gun...you put hands on steering wheel before that and dont do anything before cops says its ok....
you dont inform someone you have deadly weapon in your pocket while pulling out things from pockets
The cop asked him to take out his ID. That was what Philando did.
The difference between the Redskins and The Slants branding issue, is that the group that would stand to be disparaged in the case of The Slants, is the same force that's attempting to change the narrative with their branding. In the case of the Redskins, there are not Native Americans in charge that are calling the shots on how their culture or identity is being portrayed. Overall, these things may seem like a similar issue, but narrative and context matters. Being talked about and misrepresented is wildly different from being the one speaking and controlling the perception.
Freedom of speech means freedom of speech god dammit.
Paul Cosby The only reason I'd disagree with that is for the same reason you can't go into a movie theater and scream "FIRE!" when there isn't one. Otherwise, I'd be on board.
And no means no Cosby.
Kari Cummings that is inciting panic. You won't be charged with shouting the word, you will be charged with the aftermath of shouting it (more or less). It is the intention that gets you in trouble. The words simply convey your intentions. Like if some one said the word "fire" in a different context in the movie theater when referring to the movie they just watched to a friend. The word fire isn't illegal, it's the danger of mass panic and intent that is illegal.
Rick Sanchez just try this blue pill morty it will help
Paul Cosby oh, I know. the main reason I mentioned it was because people might take what you say a little too literal to encompass anything said as fine.
"Focus on the facts before you focus on your narrative." - Philip DeFranco
Something we should all learn and live by...
Freedom of speech is LITERALLY freedom of speech. No one should be told they can't say something because some people are offended.
So this dude had the audacity to fear that Castille smoking weed would endanger the girl, but then out of selfishness and fear pumped 7 rounds into the car which could have ricocheted and hit her or Castille's girlfriend?!? That's reckless endangerment!!!!!!!!!!! Now they both probably have PTSD. Can someone who knows tell me why cops reach for their guns first? That should be a last ditch effort. Cops have tasers that can incapacitate the human body in an instant. You don't need bullets to do that. The cop should have been charged with at least manslaughter. Nobody should be able to take a life, and not face any legitimate consequences other than getting fired.
Most cops don't. But you only hear about the ones who do because, well, when they do what they're supposed to then there's no reason to report on it.
from the looks of what happened in the video, he was informed that castile had a gun by castile himself who then proceeded to reach for something,
Was it his ID, we don't know. You can speculate all you want. But if it wasn't the id but the gun castile reached for it first.
Though it does seem like he was trying to cooperate fully.
Max Flight A gun is the only sure fire way to stop a criminal. when it comes to it its milliseconds that feel like years to make a decision to end someone's life or risk yours or worse someone else.
Max Flight Tasers are horribly ineffective on certain people. There are videos of criminals being tased and not even reacting to it.
And the reason the police brutality always makes the news is because people literally get away with murder despite video evidence, as seen in the video above. Why wouldn't I be afraid of someone who can get away with murdering me in cold blood on video?
I want twitter to come out with a subtag for twitter handles, so that if you ever retweet a news article that turns out to be completely false, you get the word "DUMBASS" stamped right next to your twitter handle for three days.
Great idea, although it should be, at the very least, a week.
cooldude56g Sounds like an interesting idea.
I think if you do it enough you get a blue check mark
what kind of black mirror shit
Instead of retweeters and dumbass, "Fake News" should just be stamped to repeat offenders so many big corporations get labeled what they are before the others get their act together.
First of all, I was horribly disappointed seeing Wonder Woman last night. I was expecting more. Blegh.
Second, that cop should never have been a cop in the first place. Clearly he had inadequate training. What in the serious fuck? How did he not get life???
where is the NRA on this
If you're jumpy or nervous then maybe you shouldn't be a police officer.
Schnefler "protect". but really though, if you cannot handle that environment then why do you purposely put yourself there?
Schnefler Haha. Oh yeah man, these cops sure do protect us well. I'm sure that's what the dude that got shot would've said, right?
and you should be actually educated on pot and not think only murderers use it
Let me guess, you smoke pot.
Remi Ogunsanya
your an idiot most men keep their wallet.in there back pocket not there front pocket where a gun is usually placed also why would you even move if the officer told you not to reach for a weapon your just fueling this bullshit for likes and views also you didn't even mention why didn't the girlfriend call an ambulance instead of streaming on Facebook while you're boyfriend is dying
was Jennifer Lawrence the biggest star in American Hustle I mean her co stars were Christian Bale, Jeremy Renner, Amy Adams and Bradley Cooper all older more experienced and more critically acclaimed actors than she was at the time plus Bale, Cooper and Adams were the leads of that movie Lawrence was more of a supporting role
YoDa BaKi
I'm incredibly surprised anyone tried to,pass her off as the "biggest" star in that movie. if anything she was still trying to,prove herself as an actress who can do adult movies and more serious roles. ALL of the actors she was with deserved the salary they got and she was still a newcomer and hadnt yet proven herself. it's a little ridiculous.
@Yoda Baki, yes that's the same thought that was in my head. Lawrence may have been the 'it' actor at the time, but I would argue that Bale, Adams, Cooper, etc absolutely deserved higher pay because they are well-established actors.
Biggest star doesn't necessarily mean best actor, at the time, she was getting massive amounts of press so yes in some ways she was the biggest star, Hollywood is fickle
Doesnt't matter if she had an Oscar or not, she wasnt the lead of the movie and if you want to talk about popularity, Christan Bale who was the leading actor in that movie is even more popular than she is...
Being the only actress/actor in the movie with an Oscar, she was automatically the "biggest" star as far as credits go. That little statue will earn you a nice raise in future movies, as well as first or special billing in the credits. Sure the others are big stars, maybe even more popular stars, but opinions doesn't sell, proof on paper does :p It also helps that she won that Oscar the year before Hustle premiered, and before production started. Had she been signed on to Hustle before her Oscar, they would've made a much bigger deal about earning an Oscar awarded actress in their movie.
No matter what, seven shots into a closed area with two other people, one being a child, is ridiculously uncalled for.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH... PERIOD... ANYTHING LESS IS INJUSTICE
Man, if he calls me a bastard one more time................ I might have to buy that shirt. just sayin.
So...
Your buying the shirt tomorrow
I love the air quotes when phil says buzzfeed "news" when talking about wonder woman getting paid less than superman
My take away from this fake news stories is a just another reason why I watch you Phil.