Role Of Medical Evidence In Offences Against Human Body | Justice S. Nagamuthu, Former Judge, Sr.Adv
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- Lex Webinar Series-62
-----------------
Topic:
"Role Of Medical Evidence In Offences Against Human Body"
---------------
Resource Person:
Justice S. Nagamuthu,
Senior Advocate,
Supreme Court of India &
Former Judge,
Madras High Court.
----------------
Hosted by
ssrlawoffice, Madurai
And
Hemalatha Law Office, Chennai
----------------
Your Lordship is a legend in criminal law
Useful for all, including investigating officers
Difficult subject lucidly interpreated. Thank You very much sir and Thanks to organizer.
Waiting for your next lecture sir.
Very informative lesson.
Nice teaching.
For the services rendered by Justice SN, to legal fraternity, he should be recommended for a "PADMA" award
Tq you me Lord. Very excellent lecture
I have no words to say,really it very helpful to us,.Great service sir.Thanks lots.Jai🇮🇳Hind🎉🎊👌🙏
Please arrange another lecture of Sir..for remaining part of forensic science/medicine.. He is an institution.
Very enlightenment super sir ❤❤
Really very useful lecture lordship.. Sharing of knowledge vil not be done by everyone, but only by some .. you are a great boon for legal field ... Stay blessed ayya...
I m thankful to Lordship for parting such practical knowledge. I will eagerly waiting for next webinar.
The Hon'ble Justice really it is great information received to us improving our knowldge.thnx a lot Hon'ble Justice.
Just I could express my gratitude with folded hands and nothing else 🙏🙏🙏
I salute Justice Nagmuthi for his great efforts and generosity to impart knowledge of laws.
Thank you Sir for your excellent presentation.I remember one definition of culpable homicide by Sir James Fitz James Stephen which is as hereunder :
"Culpable homicide is killing of a human being by another human being by an act or omission but for such an act or omission the person died would not have died at the time of his death."
Very very useful information for advocates for those who practicing criminal side. Thank you very much sir for your wonderful lecturing.
Lordship iam Very thankfull for this effective lecture ....
Wonderful insight...Great to hear to Hon'ble justice . 🦋
Detailed explanation than a science student of plus two or degree and it is necessary to every criminal advocate I feel sir.
Hon'ble Sir's lectures are very practical and detailed. Have learnt a lot. Thank you Sir.
Sir's lectures are always very lucid and brilliant Thaks Sir
Waiting the lecture on forensic medicin sir❤❤
Much awaited lecture
First time i watched video without any skip
Wonderful session! Thanks to organizers!
Excellent
Extrodinary, excellent lecture ever heard in such a simple but with clarity linked with 299 and 300 IPC
My Lord you are the Asset OfJudicary I acqired Lots Of Knowledge In Criminal Law Iam Very Greateful
@@aravindhirolli1359 my Lord justice I am thankful to learn fornsic
Perfect explanation of medical evidence sir.
Excellent, very useful.
No professor ever said about 308 IPC.Thank you Sir.
Lordship, Amazing explanation!
❤ thanks 🙏
Thank you sir.... It is a great lecture sir. Waiting for your next class.
Super message to Advocate of medical evidence
Very informative session3.8.20
Many such lectures are welcome.
You will lived long by your contributions to legal feternity
Best explanation by you sir
Excellent lecture, My lord. Very interesting and informative.
Sir, waiting patiently for your next video.
Living legend, J.Nagamuthu sir
Great lecture, very detailed. Thank you very much, sir. One small question. Whether every offence under this chapter "offences against human body" requires prosecution to prove the injury? For example s353 - does the prosecution case fail if no medical report submitted by victim?
Tq my Lord
Great lecture.. thankyou sir ji
But some time it is in South language Hard to understand..
We're eagerly waiting for the next lecture on medical jurisprudence.
Simply🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Justice S nagamuthu , please give lecture on POCSO ACT
He is 'drona' the great guru of both pandava and kourava, later the guru was dilemma, now I am not saying any resemblance to ' dronna', all these are the practices of the legal profession, anyway I have got a great respect from my heart, I want to see you sir a day, if time permits.
My humble submission, mere hurt (sec 319 IPC) cannot be injury, only voluntarily causing hurt is injury, because there is always mensrea (i.e.illegalitty is there as per Section 44 IPC) behind the injury but mensrea need not be there behind the hurt (i.e. it may be legal i.e. causing hurt by doctor by surgical operation), if illegality present behind hurt then only hurt becomes injury ( section 321 IPC onwards)
Sir just a folded hand request , wherever u spoke in language other than English ,that part went blank for many of us who don't know the language , so it would be great if u speak in English only so that each and every part of ur lecture is understood. Thanks a lot for imparting ur knowledge on us.
Yes, I accept your request. Thank you for pointing out.
@@justices.nagamuthu1410 how can i contact you.
The doctor has to record the date and time of AR entry .
U r knowledge is awesome sir . I bow to u r knowledge sir.
Education matter some information please
My humble submission is that, mere hurt (sec 319 IPC) cannot become an injury. Hurt becomes injury ony when there is illegality behind it as per Section 44 IPC, i.e. if mensrea present behind the the hurt it becomes injury (section 321 onwards i.e. voluntarily causing hurt/ grievous hurt are injury) otherwise hurt u/s 319 is a mere hurt, because mensrea need not be always there behind the hurt e g. Causing hurt by doctor by sugical operation is not injury.
Hence mere hurt is not injury
Voluntarily causing hurt becomes an injury
Dear Sh. Raghavan, will there be a continuation of what His Lordship has started. He has sort of promised to give a further lecture on certain other topics in relation to this particular topic? Yours response will be highly appreciated
Many thanks not only to you and His Lordship Ld. Shri Shri Nagamuthu
plz arrange 2nd part of lacture on the topic
For contradiction- looking from another angle- admission agaist itself- examination in chief responsibility rather than cross- though the legal position exist as said by speaker
Please make another video
Kindly arrange a webinar on hurt and medical evidence in rape cases
Sir, I was misguided and the matrimonial case is going against me even I haven't done any mistake. I also have a medical proof. I need your help sir. How can i contact you?
Can i get written notes of this lecture please
Sir I would be grateful if any one can help me with case laws referred in webinar
Not Duodenum.
It is DIAPHRAGM .
E nlightning
Is it not diaphragm
No cross examination is needed in accidental deaths when the doctors depose.
Sir your lecture is so lucid that its contents immediately strike the sense.
Excellent