Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu, Topic: Principles of Judicial Evidence - Part 1
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 жов 2024
- Friday Group:
Topic: Principles of Judicial Evidence - Part 1
Speaker: Mr. Justice (Retd.) S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Advocate. Supreme Court of India
Organizer : G.Seshagiri Rao, Advocate Supreme Court of India.
Please subscribe to our channel Friday Group : / @fridaygroupseshagirirao
It is our previlage to be able to learn from such eminent jurists.
Great great & simply great....lovely argument by res sir in resent UP child murder & rape case ,...SC aqueted the accuse.....great argument ........
Law of Evidence in criminal law,what a presentation with examples.we are indebted to you sir 👍
Amazing lecture, Thank you so much Mr. S. Nagamuthu sir.
Thank you Sir. This lecture should be heard to students who appear exams on Evidence Act. Great presentation by Ld. Judge.
The lectures are most advanced and applied logic in interpretation of evidence law. Wonderful revelation of evidence law.
Senior Advocate and Justice Nagamuthu is a rear diamond as his name suggests.
He is a man down to earth. His classes are very good & lucid.
Honourable Justice gives an insightful explanation always
You are such great humanist having interest tech young advocates in India and I am one of them thank you . In fact I prepared a notes on your speech
Thanks Sir, it's so beautifully and elaborately explained , it cleared so many doubts of evidence act
Truly informative and what a clarity of explanation .Great by his Lordship Justice S.Nagamuthu Sir
Wonderful presentation, helps to understand the concepts easily.
Great lecture. Excellent Sir. Its very useful for individual Advocates without practice under the senior like me.
very good lecture. very useful, thank you Sir and Friday group.
Easy presentation of complicated subject. Thank you very much.
So well explained with lots of patience.!👍👍👍
Sir is always Cristal clear
Truely brilliant on Evidence Act
Very nice sir
Great experience Sir
Sir This video is very useful to every citizen thanks a lot
Thank you for addressing on judicial evidence
I have no words to appreciate Justice(Retd) S Nagamuthu I would like to meet if possible
Thank u Mr. Hon’ble Justice I watched ur superb lecture in the evidence Act,
There cannot be any presumption when courts accept the evidence of eye witnesses.
Grateful Sir
Thank you, sir
Spiffing, your lecture is, my lord. Very useful
Genius sir.Thanks lots ji.Jai🇮🇳Hind.
Respected sir kindly make classes on criminal trial in cases in connection with warranty complaints and summary as well as with adduce evidence sections🙏
Wow explained in lucid Manner....👍👍
its wonderful 👏👏👏👏👏
Excellent lecture
Great lecture... Most useful
Thank you! Great insight
I am proud to say i am from his native place
Very useful.The person coughing throughout the video is distrubing the entire session.😓
Superb sir....thank u very much
Exceptional sir
Best lecture on evidence act
More and more lectures plz
"Proved."
A fact is said to be proved when, after considering the matters
before it, the Court either believes it to exist, or
considers its existence so probable that a prudent man
ought, under the circumstances of the particular case, to
act upon the supposition that it exists.
Iyya vanakam one of my told about you i hardly trying to see u in supremcourt but i couldn't .
one of my friend told about you iyya
Always downtrodden peoplesuffered by dramatic and false evidence it may be domination of highercommunity to the lowercommunity
Nice presentation, but failed to mention whether the section 133 prevails over the section 114(b) or not
Much awaited clip.
Thanks a ton, sir.
Brilliant
Very nice sir from odisha
What is the import and impact of S 57(1) of the Indian Evidence Act?
Excellent session sir
Nice
Brilliant!!
Cough is a disturbance.
Excellent
Someone was coughing in front of Mike which makes disturbance to hear the rule of law.
1
Super
thanks a lot
My favourite
Please keep lecture on cross examination
Wonderful
Please organise a lecture on why Uttar Pradesh which tops the State list in having maximum number of pending cases has just one Bench and that too so near to Allahabad and nowhere else and why the litigants of West UP of 30 districts have been attached with Allahabad and not with Lucknow where there is a Bench which was just not needed as it is so close to Allahabad and nowhere else due to which the litigants of West UP have to travel whole night and half day all the way to Allahabad to seek justice and this despite the irrefutable fact that it is West UP which owes for more than half of the total number of pending cases of UP and for which Justice Jaswant Singh Commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Jaswant Singh recommended three HC Benches and yet not one created and for Maharashtra which is the home state of incumbent CJI Dr Dhananjay Yashwant Chandrachud and which already had multiple HC Benches was given one more at Aurangabad in 1985 but not a single for West UP or even for whole of Uttar Pradesh as recommended? Why lawless Bihar which is the home state of incumbent President of Supreme Court Bar Association Mr Vikas Singh has not even a single HC Bench? Kindly explain! My very best wishes and best regards, Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate
🙏🙏🙏
7.35-36.Is it u/s162 of Crpc, sir.
Sir
Case डिसीजन-- We the juveniles after admonishing them. There shall be no disqualification of the juvenile and records concerning to this case shall be removed that the concerned authority as per section 19 of the juvenile Justice act 2000. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
पुलिस वेरिफिकेशन में सरकारी नौकरी में दिक्कत आएगी सर
No wish of Them
Maaf ki
Somebody is murmuring which is distracting