Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Boeing Starliner Disaster! NASA Is Giving Up... and Realized SpaceX Better...
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 сер 2024
- Boeing Starliner Disaster! NASA Is Giving Up... and Realized SpaceX Better...
===
Boeing Starliner Disaster! NASA Is Giving Up... and Realized SpaceX Better...
NASA indefinitely delayed the return flight of two astronauts on Starliner but continues to assert that this is not a 'stranded' situation.
So, is that the truth?
Indeed, Boeing Starliner Is Getting Worse Than You Think!
Let's find out on today's episode of Alpha Tech:
On June 5, the Crew Flight Test (CFT) mission of Boeing's CST-100 Starliner spacecraft completed its first stage by successfully sending two astronauts to the ISS. However, the return process did not go as smoothly.
In a statement on June 18, NASA said that the event of bringing astronauts back to Earth would occur after the second of the two planned spacewalks at the space station, which was scheduled for July 2.
Boeing Starliner Disaster! NASA Is Giving Up... and Realized SpaceX Better...
That spacewalk has since been postponed to late July after a water leak from a suit umbilical line in the airlock just as a June 24 spacewalk was beginning, that spacewalk was scrubbed.
This has led to the Starliner's test flight schedule being extended by at least a month and a half, and possibly longer.
On the afternoon of June 28, at a press conference, NASA explained that the additional delay is to conduct ground tests on the Starliner's RCS thrusters to try to replicate the conditions that caused the thrusters to malfunction during the approach to the station. These tests, expected to start this week, will last at least a few weeks.
Boeing Starliner Disaster! NASA Is Giving Up... and Realized SpaceX Better...
Steve Stich, NASA commercial crew program manager, noted that these ground tests would also allow for a detailed examination of the thrusters to determine the possible causes of the issue, something that cannot be done with the thrusters in space on the Starliner. These thrusters are located in the spacecraft's service module, which is discarded and burns up in the atmosphere, making post-flight study impossible.
“This will be the real opportunity to examine the thruster just like we had in space on the ground, with detailed inspections,” he said.
Doing those tests now, rather than after Starliner returns, gives spacecraft controllers the option to do additional thruster tests on Starliner before undocking and to get as much data out of the spacecraft before it leaves home.
===
#alphatech
#techalpha
#spacex
#elonmusk
#starliner
===
Subcribe Alpha Tech: / @alphatech4966
===
When guests comes to your house and their car breaks down in your driveway.
Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic have not in fact sent people to LEO, as this video states around 22 minutes in. Getting to "space" is very different from reaching orbital velocity.
It’s a little hard to keep clicking on a space update video when there is no update just a rehash of what we have heard before
Starliner is a beacon of junk
Yep it's the spacecraft equivalent to windows vista
Yeah!
I have followed the issues with Starliner for a long time now. In my opinion, my gut feel, is that Starliner is a "dead duck" and I feel that Mr Stitch and the rest of NASA as well as Boeing are just "kicking the can down the road". Even forgetting the gross budget overrun, there have been excuses after excuses as to why Starliner cannot return to Earth. It is just politics now.
That is the obvious result of Boeing and NASA DEI POLICY
I am reluctant to say this but, it appears that Starliner has severe issues, Boeing has seriously inadequate Quality Control procedures and NASA appears to be desperate to save face for Boeing. Since Boeing agreed to the "Fixed Price" Commercial Program, Boeing has been bleeding its profits away. Apparently, Boeing's management is accustomed to squeezing NASA and the American taxpayers for their outdated and poor Engineering, Management and Quality Control practices. What's more, NASA is desperately trying to hold on to the only alternative it has to SpaceX. Frankly, i believe that if SpaceX exhibited this many problems (irregularities) in a single mission, NASA would either remove or at best, reevaluate SpaceX's "Certification." That brings me to my point. Even if (when), Starliner brings our highly decorated heroes home safely, I believe that NASA and Boeing should get together in a DETAILED talk about the engineering of, and quality control involved in that "capsule." It's bad enough that the capsule is an antique, when compared to their competitors, but their constant delays and acquisition of taxpayer monies is unsustainable and should be properly audited for possible mismanagement. Boeing received more than twice the amount of money than SpaceX and delivered an outdated, non-reusable capsule in "more than twice the amount of time" as SpaceX. I, as a taxpayer would like to believe my money is NOT BEING MISMANAGED. I do know that if I performed my job as poorly as Boeing did for this project, I would be fired!!
Anyway this is my view, opinion on this issue, such as it is.
They can't afford to pay for quality control because they're paying their executives way more than they're worth I wonder if any of them ever graduated high school
There are thousands of career paper pushers at Boeing and NASA. The janitors can tell the whole story of what is wrong with both outfits. $Millions + are spent on all the cousins getting a paycheck. While the real workers building stuff out in those cold drafty warehouses can't even get clean coveralls.
Boeing: Starliner is safe to carry Astronauts. NASA: .........RRRRRIIIIIIGGGGHHHHTTT!!!!!!!!!!!
Hahha
This is a terrible video editing job. Volume balance issues and noticeable 1 second pauses between cuts. You should really re-edit this.
They’ve done this before, don’t care
Intel Inside. 😂
The total down fall.............Boeing should have NEVER bought McD
Maybe they should have just bought McDonald’s 🍔
@@charlestaylor8805they thought they were 😂
They don't want this to impact the stock price of Boeing
Yeah, as if Boeing's comments & assurances are "good as gold"... Nothing can possibly go wrong with their equipment..Right? 🙄😔
I get the impression Starliner is not fit for purpose, and was seriously undercooked as a concept. So, how do you de-orbit this dead hulk if it outlasts the 45 day limit? Or will they keep it parked with the ISS until NASA de-orbits BOTH at ISS end-of-life?
The problem with that idea is that the ISS is short on places to dock. They are not going to have a work around to keep Starliner connected indefinitely.
Good Morning. The first mistakes is I would call it successful. They made it. That's about it. The more time that passes. The more likely it can't make it back. And they should be smart enough to know it. The more it sits. The rustier it gets.
That's right, but they are determined not to take help from crew dragon
Let's see.. Russian engined, looks like it was cobbled together from other flight-rated components from the 70's, non-reusable, and infrequent launces but twice as much to develop, and never flies. I'm not sure that having a second launch option is any benefit if it has cost this much, and doesn't work.
Thanks for the info about this junky tin can. FYI the flow of the voiceover was very jarring and seemingly cuts out for seconds at a time between each sentence. Can you keep the flow more natural? Thanks! 🙏🏽
If Boeing doesn't shape up fast and change radically its business model of profit above quality, it will be toast in 10 years time.
Appolo 11 can put man on moon 60 years ago and return safely , but starliner only managed to provide 1 trip to iss without return ticket .
When should people/companies be held accountable to statements? Doesn't seem like you should ever assert something unless you have reason to believe the assertion. You should be held accoutable to your assertions, or it's just and overconfident lie.
A Starliner launch to the ISS = 1 Billion $ . A SpaceX launch to the ISS = 100 Million $ . Are NASA and Boeing insane ?
Why is every episode a cobbling together of short reports without paring away the overlaps?
This smells of cut-and-paste “writing” and is very irritatingly amateurish.
Very poor editing. You're losing viewers.
Omg! Can you show me where you are not satisfied?
@@alphatech4966 Read comments: "This is a terrible video editing job. Volume balance issues and noticeable 1 second pauses between cuts. You should really re-edit this." Details mean everything, the difference between 'acceptable' and 'professional'. Set standards and ENFORCE them. I've managed operations all my life. I generally like your channel, but it need improvement. You have potential, but...
@@jcdisci they don’t care,, boiler room journalism
Virgin galactic and sue origin.. did not send anyone to low earth orbit... the sent them on a pogo ride.. up and down.. no orbit
Suborbit bro
@kooboos89 um call it zero orbit.. or no orbit.. the word dosnt even belong there... joy ride is about it...
What about the limited supplies, oxygen, room, etc on ISS? Was the 45 day window when they ran out of supplies? Les ISS have the extra room-it seems very crowded? Honest questions I can’t find answers to. Please help.
Its now July 15th - I assume they are still there now?
However recent Dragon 9 failure not mentioned so not sure how fresh this video is
The idea of standard docking limits innovation. Basic interface ability to a rescue dock allows improvements and rescue missions
How can you compare the starliner with the falcon second stage? How many times has SpaceX been using the falcon boosters and not lost a payload of any kind? How many crew dragons have had any problems with going to and returning from the space station without any problems.?
Is Starliner going to take as long to get down as long as it took to get up? Think there going to decommision the iss before that happens.
In the old days everyone say "If not Boeing, I'm not going". But today for space. "If not SpaceX, I'm not going". 😁
Perhaps “If it’s a Boeing, I’m not going”
"Mark Crappy"😂
Yea and the month of June has came and gone.
WHAT A FAILURE
2weeks out of date reports
Not to mention the trouble with docking and had to manually!
Starliner is nothing more than Space Junk testing thrusters during a mission in space tells many issues about Boeing technology that be said Boeing, has placed the starliner crew in harms way.
What a creative bunch of jibbery, pokery. But I guess such language sells used cars.
Boing is full of it, they have another 737 on their hands! Looks like it will be Super-Musk to the rescue ! I have made it an issue in my life to not fly in modern Boing aircraft ever again.
Hey Bot Guy ! ...... Y'er a bit out of Date ! ... It's Sunday , July 14 ..... Try and keep up ! ... :-[
Thank you for your reminder!
What a mess over a helium leak
Sorry to hear that! But don’t give up, improve & strengthen it and continue. Nevertheless, alternative is required.
Look this is Boeing issue and Boeing is working on it. It looks at this point both Boeing and NASA have this, and the undocking of the crewed Starliner and safe return to earth meet all the safety concerns and requirements. The whole process is within , Starliner,Crew, and the ISS safety envelope. Boeing is just gathering more data and NASA is Good with that. If you think about it Both Boeing and NASA have been around along time and understand the complexity of doing Space. Both entities must be transparent About issues and solutions because to do otherwise is totally unacceptable when it comes to human life and our taxpayer dollars.
are you a boing or nasa employee?
Nope
Your assessment seems fair, logical, well thought out and informed.
I could be forgiven for believing your comment was not even written and posted from your mother's basement.
As this forum is for fanboys and haters, you clearly have no place here.
Kindly go away.
Nelson, you change your mind like the weather. Nelson is too old to lead. NASA anymore. Retire already nelson
Aluminum pipping was used on retro thrusters instead of titanium. Opes it hard to tell difference. Got to love DEI
It’s better to be on the ground wishing you were in orbit than to be in orbit wishing you were on the ground
All the wasted money 😢. How can we go to Mars when we can’t even get into orbit efficiently 😮
Don't even thinking about going to moon in the first place.😂
The both managements are also " to improve"!
different between spacex vs boeing
spacex = real engineering leaders vs boeing = bean-counter executives
spacex is leaned more towards on how engineers run a company while boeing is more towards only making more money
OMG, this is realistic storyline Lost in space. What going up must coming down😅
How can Sunni and Butch return n a spaceship that they have not been trained to fly?
As passengers.
Is this a repost? Old dates! NASA is like political spin! My concern now is space metal fatigue with an unproven vehicle!
Boeing Starliner was never fit for flight, the issues is with the CEO to engineers of Boeing and the company needs to be reworked from the top down to resolve the main issues.. and Not the hardware.
obviously an old video (starliner will return the end of June)
Alpha Tech again two weeks behind everyone else!... wake up or give up...
Yeah and this is today! 😅
Perhaps Mark Nappi should have the vessel renamed after him…as the “NappiLiner” or “DiaperLiner?”
@@AcousticallyYours pantyliner?.. just sayin..
Yep i think they only sent it up to try to prove something to the companys share holders . Theres been that many problems with this thing and its been eating up more an more coin they then had to try someyhing to try to prove they know what they are doing . Give up now and stick to planes instead an leave space to the peiple who know what they are doing
Like problem solving from the "WOKE" playbook ... "We know exactly what we're going to do and what we'll do next ...but, it doesn't mean we know it'll work, just means we'll have a new plan ... quite frankly, we don't know WTF we're doing 😵
Much of what’s going on with starliner compares with the new EV beating motors from Toyota and the new superior battery technologies that are promising to supersede the Nickle and Lithium based Battery technology. Promises promises promises ! We will have to wait …
Boeing is notorious for not being staight with the press. So if they're catching flak, well, that's what happens when your words mean nothing.
Sorry, could NOT give a thumbs up on this episode. EDIT UPDATE: Last few minutes discussing a dedicated universal space rescue ship was interesting.
What is MUG TRAP means? It was behaviour stuck of the door!
Could NASA have the Service module returned to the ISS instead of being deorbited? In that way some examination of it could be made whilst in orbit.
Great Video ! NASA is also testing the ISS with a Crew of nine ! With the SpaceX Crew Dragon (4), the Boeing Starliner (4) and the Russian Capsule (3) the ISS could have a Crew of eleven (11) on the ISS ! With more Crew aboard the ISS more Research can be done at the ISS ! Also soon a second space station will be in orbit with a Fuel Depot nearby ! When the LS South Pole Lunar Outpost/Base (Clementine Base) with a LS Fuel Depot nearby the cost of missions to the moon can be reduced ! The Tech to go to the moon to stay, can take US and the world to Mars and beyond ! tjl
Thank you so much!
Why does it need 28 thrusters?
4 thrusters on each axis, ie. X+, x-, y+, y-, z+, and z-. That's 12. Add a second set for redundancy, that's now 24. Add another 4 as special purpose thrusters. That makes 28.
Was the Falcon - Starlink explosion about finding a disgruntled employee, passed over for a promotion. Meet that person over beers and provide an opportunity to boost both the ego and wealth of the malcontent. Insert a simple modification of code raising a pressure limit far above the capacity of a valve. This might cause an unexpected leak and an explosion. Time to check employee bank accounts? 344
😮
Disappointing
I enjoyed that video. I like that your passion, personality and knowledge is evident on all your videos I've seen. Good content
Thank you so much! Have a good day!
Fake
unable to get airplanes right, boeing says "why don't we diversify & try space vehicles".
Well, Falcon is grounded now pending investigation. Not aging well
Hold on a perfectly good Falcon rocket with an impeccable record has a major fault when it’s being considered for a Boeing spacecraft rescue?
Bad haircut.
Considering this is Starliner first try and they actually made it to space is amazing compared to NASA and Spacex first tries.. Media is unfair.
Um...nope. First crew. Not first try. Years behind schedule and billions over budget. Read up. Keep up.
The Minnow made it to Gilligan's Island on the first try which was preety amazing considering it's management. Unfortunately the crew of the Minnow had to try to get a ride home from bigger, better built and managed ships.
This is true Click Bait! There is absolutely nothing new in this episode that has not already been disclosed! Come on...publish new material or don't publish!