The Glenallachie single malts with a new design and a comparison of GlenAllachie 15 old and new

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 бер 2024
  • The Glenallachie single malts with a new design - WhiskyJason gives his opinion on the design changes and compares the old 15 year old with the new GlenAllachie 15 year old
    GlenAllachie's revamped visual identity, developed by Scottish design agency Threebrand, is intended to represent "the evolution of the brand" since the launch of the first core range in 2018 and subsequent year-on-year sales growth.
    The relaunch is accompanied by a renewed brand message, emphasised by the slogan "Whisky in good hands", highlighting the expert team behind the brand under the leadership of Billy Walker. Despite the new look, the award-winning core range of 10-, 12-, 15- and 18-year-old single malt bottlings remains.
    Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 35

  • @crystalmethshrimp
    @crystalmethshrimp 2 місяці тому +5

    Thanks for the great video Jason. Unfortunately, the new branding seems very generic and reminds me of craft paper during art time back when I was a weee lad. Atleast the old brand was well “known” for being bad. That in itself gave it familiarity..

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +3

      yep - the new branding seems very generic

  • @heartbroken522
    @heartbroken522 2 місяці тому +4

    the old font is what made glenallachie unique and distinguishable from other distilleries😢

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +2

      maybe - still didn't like it

  • @lyacoubian
    @lyacoubian 2 місяці тому +4

    I think I noticed the word GLENALLACHIE embossed right below the front label on the new bottle.
    Even though color choices like the light blue and Olive green are not very attractive, I prefer the new layout.

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +1

      whoops - I missed the GLENALLACHIE embossed right below the front label on the new bottle

  • @vangstr
    @vangstr 2 місяці тому +4

    The old looks better and tasted better.

  • @NeilImmortal
    @NeilImmortal 2 місяці тому +3

    In all honesty I did love the 15 from '21 and '22 but opened one a few weeks ago and was shocked at how "hot" it was. However I know in 6 months it will be amazing 😉 In comparison, the new 15, is way less hot from the get go, but it does tend more towards a meaty chocolate coffee concoction (I am sipping it now). Very different to the old bottling which is sweetness. Both are good and the packaging is now better 😏

  • @thisarfingai
    @thisarfingai 2 місяці тому +6

    I never liked the oold font & I don't like the new one either. The letters are too squashed together and too tall in relation to their width. I do like the two left justified lines below - that looks less cluttered than the centred original. Not a fan of the new colours either - a bit too pastel for my liking. and as for the tasting notes... they have always been flowery rubbish. Glenallachie is trading HARD on Billy Walker's celebrity, and are obviously dialling up the volume of output. Lets see if the new juice is as good as what he inherited...

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +2

      VERY TRUE! - tasting notes... they have always been flowery rubbish. Glenallachie is trading HARD on Billy Walker's celebrity,

  • @gregstein3250
    @gregstein3250 4 дні тому +1

    Raises the question, Jason, how would you compare the 10 y/o cask strength Batch 10 versus this new 15 y/o? Which do you prefer?

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 дні тому

      both are good - but one has 46% and the other 58.6%

  • @jbar6284
    @jbar6284 2 місяці тому +2

    I don't really care too much what the packaging looks like, either old or new. What matters for me is the taste. The old packaging is/has become recognisable/familiar, but the new will presumably do likewise with time. Same as with other packaging/labelling changes like Benromach, etc.
    I had mistakenly thought the old 15 was finished only in Oloroso casks, but at least local retailers today mention PX as well alongside photos of the old label, so either I was mistaken or there was an earlier change?
    I'm curious about your discussion of sherry casks because you mention the "old days" and casks with real sherry in them for ~4-5 years. I don't say you're necessarily mistaken but am curious about what you mean/are referring to?
    Before the current era of sherry-seasoned casks was the preceding era of travel casks, in which sherry was put into non-solera casks for travel to the UK which thus may have seasoned the casks for as little as a few months, or maybe a year or more. OK, yes, in theory some sherry may have sat in cask in a UK warehouse for a long time before bottling and sale, but that will have been fairly exceptional. Yes, this was all drinking sherry rather than the current precedent to sherry vinegar that's used to season casks in the Jerez region now, but not all bottled sherry back then was necessarily top-grade stuff. Yes, it was different from sherry syrup, but there was also paxarette used for awhile--another can of worms. But what seems clear is that these were *almost* never ex-solera casks, the casks in which sherry is "made"/matured. Ex-solera casks were not desirable for the whisky industry, mostly, because they were all *inactive* US oak, and all one size: butt. No sherry is made using active wood, and there's no point to a more expensive European oak cask if its going to be inactive--might as well just use the customary and a lot cheaper US oak for that. A neutral, slightly-porous container is what sherry soleras require, and if such a cask is still "good"/non-leaky then it's too precious to the sherry industry to be used for something one-off like shipping/travel. The whisky industry, for the *most* part, instead wanted more active wood, and sometimes European oak, and sometimes smaller sizes such as hogsheads, etc. One exception I have read about is Dailuaine distillery which did favour ex-solera casks despite their wood being inactive. Other exceptions may be distilleries experimenting with Palo Cortado, Manzanilla, or other such (for whisky) relative rarities where they *may* be ex-solera rather than seasoned.

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +1

      the type of "sherry" is my problem syrupy plastic taste

  • @chrisweber4039
    @chrisweber4039 2 місяці тому +2

    Hi Jason! I was hoping you would do a video like this about the new bottles😁 I would also be very interested in watching a review of the 18 year old. I am curious if it has gotten better over the years with more time in Billy's hands.

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +1

      My video of the Glenallachie should be out in a few weeks

  • @WhiskyWars
    @WhiskyWars Місяць тому +1

    Great in depth review! I think I’ve missed the boat on these then because the older style seems a little better but still may pick up one or two in the future, cheers! 🥃

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  Місяць тому

      10 and 12 are the best value for money in my opinion

    • @janteun3
      @janteun3 19 днів тому +1

      @@WhiskyJason1 the 12 is amazing en cheap ofcourse bud bro donth vorgett the 15 years old yes ofcourse whisky is now more expensive then a couple of years ago sadly 😴😴😴😴 bud the 15 years old is amazing en 70 euro is vor this time we live a good price vor this bottle you get so mutch whisky vor that price en yes i stil olso need to adjust to the new prices sadly vor good 15 years old whisky 70 euro vor a goood 15 year old sherrie whisky is sadly the new price from now on 🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧 en i olso think whisky prices are only goiging to rise from this point sadly 😔😔 my thaughts on whisky prices in the first 5 years what we now pay vor 18 years old we pay the same price vor the 15 now whith 5 years what we pay now vor 18 years old sadly to many people drink it now sadly prices only are goinging up 😭😭😭😭

    • @janteun3
      @janteun3 19 днів тому +1

      @@WhiskyJason1 Speyburn 18 is a master piece bro damm so good a reallll old sherrie bommm buy it bro why are you goining to do a review about the Speyburn 18

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  15 днів тому +1

      good question - I will have to find a bottle

  • @user-no6xe6vs6q
    @user-no6xe6vs6q 2 місяці тому +3

    I prefer the old look Glen Allachie products . The new ones will have to get a much better use to🐵🦔🐧🐻

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +1

      I also need time to get use to them

  • @thebolbiggity
    @thebolbiggity 2 місяці тому +5

    the repackaging looks worse

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +2

      I didn't love either of them

  • @andriiyeremenko7406
    @andriiyeremenko7406 2 місяці тому +2

    Speyburn 15...not a sherry bomb completely but tastes better for me than old GlenAllachie 15...and cheaper)

    • @WhiskyJason1
      @WhiskyJason1  2 місяці тому +3

      Thanks - nice!

    • @lyacoubian
      @lyacoubian 2 місяці тому +2

      I agree 100%

    • @janteun3
      @janteun3 19 днів тому

      Speyburn 18 is a master piece bro damm so good a reallll old sherrie bommm buy it bro

  • @LGB007
    @LGB007 2 місяці тому

    The old labels so much better and unique. The new packaging was not and is not needed. It looks somehow more amateurish and cheap.

  • @sinemetu1040
    @sinemetu1040 2 місяці тому +4

    Not a fan of the new labeling at all!!! 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻