The Difference Between Caliph, Sultan, Emir & more | Ranks of Middle Eastern Monarchs Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
  • Project Middle East: • Project Middle East
    My Patreon: / kobean_history
    My Twitter: / kobean_history
    My Discord Server: / discord (discord.gg/Twp4JQP)
    00:00 Introduction
    00:34 Shah/Shahanshah/Padishah
    01:38 Malik (King)
    03:14 Hākim/Hakem
    03:34 Imam
    03:51 Caliph
    05:13 Wali al-Ahd (Designated Heir)
    06:13 Emir
    07:25 Sultan
    We will go over the different tiers and ranks of monarchs within the middle east.
    Music by Vindsvept (Munin's Return)
    / vindsvept
    CC BY 4.0 License: creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    #ProjectMiddleEast
    Sources:
    books.google.co.uk/books?id=f...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shah
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padishah
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malik
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hakim_(...)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imam
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imamate
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caliphate
    Kadi, Wadad; Shahin, Aram A. (2013). "Caliph, caliphate". The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought: 81-86
    Al-Rasheed, Madawi; Kersten, Carool; Shterin, Marat (2012). Demystifying the Caliphate: Historical Memory and Contemporary Contexts. Oxford University Press. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-19-932795-9. (books.google.co.uk/books?id=E...)
    Ringmar, Erik (2020). 4. The Muslim Caliphates. OBP collection. Open Book Publishers. pp. 73-100. ISBN 978-1-78374-024-6. Retrieved 7 April 2022. (books.openedition.org/obp/9091)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wali_al...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emir
    web.archive.org/web/201608070...
    www.datarabia.com/royals/famil...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultan
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultan_...
    James Edward Montgomery (2004). ʻAbbasid Studies: Occasional Papers of the School of ʻAbbasid Studies, Cambridge, 6-10 July 2002. Peeters Publishers. p. 83. ISBN 978-90-429-1433-9. (books.google.co.uk/books?id=V...)
    Riad Aziz Kassis (1999). The Book of Proverbs and Arabic Proverbial Works. BRILL. p. 65. ISBN 90-04-11305-3. (books.google.co.uk/books?id=_...)
    Kramers, J.H.; Bosworth, C.E.; Schumann, O.; Kane, Ousmane (2012). "Sulṭān". In Bearman, P.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C.E.; van Donzel, E.; Heinrichs, W.P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill.
    Duri, A.A. (2012). "Amīr". In Bearman, P.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C.E.; van Donzel, E.; Heinrichs, W.P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Brill.
    Esposito, John L., ed. (2003). "Sultan". The Islamic World: Past and Present. Oxford University Press.
    Turan, Ebru (2009). "Sultan". In Esposito, John L. (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford University Press.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @ntluck1592
    @ntluck1592 2 роки тому +27

    Sultan was usually reserved to warlords who claimed land as their own domain. It literally means "one who holds power" and all of the early ones where military leaders. The reason the Ottomans called themselves Sultans was also because they saw themselves as a martial society and carved out their own kingdom from their enemies.

    • @forickgrimaldus8301
      @forickgrimaldus8301 Рік тому

      Warrior King or Military Ruler but its still close to King in Europe as to be fair there is usually a ton of wars in the Medieval period so destinction wasn't really a concern in Europe at the time.

    • @dindin8753
      @dindin8753 8 місяців тому +1

      Not really they're effectively a king but with different title they don't have to be a military leader to be a sultan.

    • @ntluck1592
      @ntluck1592 8 місяців тому

      @@dindin8753 They almost always started by warlords and then their descendants would carry on the title

    • @dindin8753
      @dindin8753 8 місяців тому

      @@ntluck1592 well yeah cuz technically most nations in history are ruled by warlords at first for example charlemagne, Alfred the great, gilgamesh, Cyrus the great, kingdom of Israel and etc.

    • @jj-yi1ne
      @jj-yi1ne 7 місяців тому

      you are saying that because you are a christian so you’re wrong

  • @Artur_M.
    @Artur_M. 2 роки тому +9

    Very nice explanation!

  • @redalchemy7322
    @redalchemy7322 2 роки тому +11

    This was very informative. I regrettably don't know much abut the history or power structure of the middle east, but this seems like a good framework to understand some of the terminology.
    Thank you for making this!

  • @HistoryandHeadlines
    @HistoryandHeadlines 2 роки тому +4

    Having the chapters is a nice touch!

  • @GallowglassAxe
    @GallowglassAxe 2 роки тому +10

    Great video as always. You did a good job explaining this rather complicated topic.

  • @omkargouraje6243
    @omkargouraje6243 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks to project meadal east, through which I reaced to this video, I knew it but not confident on knowledge, I india similar terms were used to rank the structure.

  • @MarcusAgrippa390
    @MarcusAgrippa390 2 роки тому +4

    Glad to see you are back!
    Thanks for the video!

  • @martinemartin4779
    @martinemartin4779 2 роки тому +4

    Wow! This is the first video I have seen from Kobean History in a while. So glad to see this one today. Thank you!

  • @hoslabara2703
    @hoslabara2703 5 місяців тому +1

    Caliph and Caliphate.
    Sultan and Sultanate
    Emir and Emirate
    Malik and Mulk
    Badshah/Padishah and
    Hakeem.
    These 6 terms used ond

  • @AG-by9mj
    @AG-by9mj 2 роки тому +4

    Very well made, however I just wanted to add a small correction.
    Hakim is still used today. Although individual states of the United Arab Emirates are called Emirates, they do not use the term Emir. Only Kuwait and Qatar uses Emir. The Emirates of the UAE use the term Hakim in Arabic, Hakim Dubai/Abu Dhabi/Sharjah etc to distinguish which Emirate the leader governs.
    There is also the term Sheikh, which means the leader of a tribe and is a title given to the leader of a specific tribe. It is also a term given to a community's Imam and judge who settles dispute between people.

  • @KierTheScrivener
    @KierTheScrivener 2 роки тому +3

    Loved this video!

  • @user-xb2hh1tg5v
    @user-xb2hh1tg5v 8 місяців тому

    Here in the Philippines,in olden days we have Sultan,Datu and Rajah

  • @RudolfHuber
    @RudolfHuber Рік тому +1

    I like your videos - very educational. No fluff - just the facts. Thanks for your work.

  • @nestortheemporos
    @nestortheemporos Рік тому +3

    the 'election' of the caliph/ruler is strangely similar to that of the holy roman empire.
    arabia used to have some kind of limited democracy, and it served them well; i hope that they can get something like it again.

    • @forickgrimaldus8301
      @forickgrimaldus8301 Рік тому

      That and the Caliph also has a number of similarities to other Emperors, being both the Religious and at times Political head of the State (like the Byzantine and Chinese Emperors) as well as a Figure head (like how the Emperors of Japan became puppets to the Shogun)

  • @allseeingeye7095
    @allseeingeye7095 2 роки тому +2

    Please keep these up!

  • @oneileo66
    @oneileo66 Рік тому

    Thanks,now I understand 👍

  • @iliaselmaghrebi9114
    @iliaselmaghrebi9114 2 роки тому +4

    To add
    Sultan means absolute authority whoever have that over his domain is a sultan it can be an empire city-state or kingdom

    • @forickgrimaldus8301
      @forickgrimaldus8301 Рік тому

      Weirdly enough in some cases in Europe its normal to have a King/Queen run an Empire (e.g the Anguvin Empire) but without the title of Emperor either because they don't want beef with the Holy Roman Empire and by extension the Church or because it was seen as unfashionable as after the Protestant reformation.
      (I will say that Sultan is a more flexible term though as in its basic sense its just Military Ruler)

    • @iliaselmaghrebi9114
      @iliaselmaghrebi9114 Рік тому +1

      @@forickgrimaldus8301 sultan is close to dicator in roman empire a khaliffah was seen as a religious leader and under him where sultan who controlled state as absolute authority like a shogunate

    • @forickgrimaldus8301
      @forickgrimaldus8301 Рік тому

      @@iliaselmaghrebi9114 yeah I mention in another chat that it oddly remined me of the Shoguns and Emperors of Japan but Sultan is more like just a fancyer way of calling someone a Warrior King or Leader but with out the special title that is Shogun.

    • @iliaselmaghrebi9114
      @iliaselmaghrebi9114 Рік тому

      @@forickgrimaldus8301 is shogun a special title ? I believe it means military leader so in terminology its closer to emir but in function its like a sultan
      But i do not know much about japan so i may be wrong

    • @forickgrimaldus8301
      @forickgrimaldus8301 Рік тому

      @@iliaselmaghrebi9114 yes but in contrast to how Sultan is used its more prestegious of a title basically the equivalent of head of the military as in the most powerful Feudal Lord. (In Contrast Sultan is a bit more modest as it just means practically a Military leader not really Leader of the Islamic State's Military)

  • @mohsen6274
    @mohsen6274 2 роки тому +2

    Bahrain wasn’t an independent country before 1971, that’s why the ruler was named “hakem” i.e. it’s not equivalent to the king rank

  • @sophustranquillitastv4468
    @sophustranquillitastv4468 Рік тому +2

    I think Sultan and Malik are the same tier of title which mean king or emperor according to context but Sultan have religious connotation though both are worldly titles. Caliph on the other hand should be considered the similar type of title as the Pope or Dalai Lama. Even though they govern worldly political entities they are mainly titles for spiritual leadership who have universal authority in theory.
    Then what about Beg or Sheik? Are they comparable to the like of count or marquis or what are they?

  • @lokiyih
    @lokiyih Рік тому

    Also Nigeria has the Sultan of Sokoto, who is the ruler of the Sokoto Caliphate.

  • @papazataklaattiranimam
    @papazataklaattiranimam 2 роки тому +2

    Based Sultan

  • @blank3963
    @blank3963 Рік тому

    What is the difference of caliph, sultan, cakravartin, and devaraja?

  • @tjo6252
    @tjo6252 Рік тому

    Selim I was the first Ottoman to be called Caliph.

  • @he4620
    @he4620 Рік тому

    Greeting to all Shahs from Shahanshah Cyrus the Great to Shah Ismaeil I and mohammadreza Shah of Iran🇮🇷🌺

  • @depreciatingasset
    @depreciatingasset 2 роки тому

    Waliy ahed means crown prince

  • @panaglaw
    @panaglaw Рік тому

    Ι think you forgot Khan?

  • @omkardhakephalkar2737
    @omkardhakephalkar2737 2 роки тому

    What about Badshah, used by rulers like Akbar in India?

  • @sidjoosin6549
    @sidjoosin6549 Рік тому

    malik is king, but in Islam was saw as a little negative, too arrogant for man to call himself "malik".
    So title of highest ruler in early Islam - was "amir al-mu'minin" - "commander of believers", also, more rarely, known as "khalifa" (in Europe - reverse, they call someone "he was amir al mu'minin" more rarely than "he was a khalif").

  • @zach415
    @zach415 2 місяці тому

    So then a Caliph is like the Muslim Pope?

  • @Tu51ndBl4d3
    @Tu51ndBl4d3 2 роки тому +1

    Egypt is in Africa.

    • @HistoryandHeadlines
      @HistoryandHeadlines 2 роки тому +2

      Someone wrote the same thing on my video...

    • @ahmedsaleh9509
      @ahmedsaleh9509 2 роки тому

      And in asia

    • @moonshadowsong
      @moonshadowsong Рік тому +1

      @@ahmedsaleh9509 getting some land in Asia didn't mean you are one, so is turkey , spanish get land in africa doesn't mean they can call they self one

  • @depreciatingasset
    @depreciatingasset 2 роки тому

    Malik is Arabic. Shah is persian

    • @forickgrimaldus8301
      @forickgrimaldus8301 Рік тому +1

      Yup but both means well King its basically the Rex/King situation in Europe