Nice review though a basic one. The worry I had about this radio was with the latency/speed/response or however people choose to describe it and it appears it's in a range not to my personal liking so I'd never use it as a main radio. What I do appreciate is the extras this radio brings to the table compared to others as well as Radiolinks proven range capability. However for me, the overall size, speed and programmable features (servo frequency for example) of the Noble Pro will keep me locked into it for the foreseeable future.
They absolutely do have micro Rx's for these, all backwards compatible. I run my Orlandoo's with my RC6GS. Throttle response on my RC6 is better than the Futaba 4PL that I replaced with it. Way more responsive than a buddies Spectrum 5ch. I would take the RC6 racing any day. This thing, RC8X, is a wet dream to those of us that run everything from 5th scale to 35th. If it wasn't so close to X-mas, and grocery prices weren't through the roof, I'd already have one on the way.
Nice quick look. I bought this radio specifically for surface FPV, plenty of channels to control the vehicle, and enough left to control a gimble. The built in FPV display+DVR+cable ports is what sets this system apart from almost everything else. It is not a replacement for my 4PM, just fills a different roll. They do have nano rx available. I got a 6 pack of R4FGMs for less than a $100( about $17 each) They do have an antenna, they claim to still have 400 meters of range, and they are gyro equipped. The gyro is going to be nice in some of my rowdy 3s micro builds.
Nice to hear your opinion on the RC8X, I'm looking at buying one of these radios for my bashers and speedrun cars like my XO-1 since i don't have a radio for it yet and i really like all the features of it especially the gyro. If you're wondering i already own a Futaba 4PM original and so does my dad i just want something with more features, a gyro and great range but looking pro on a budget the RC8X certainly fits very well i can't wait to get mine next month.
No idea if you've gone and bought an RC8X yet, but a video I looked at for the 4PM indicates that the Futaba comes with an S-Bus receiver. Have you considered connecting a Futaba gyro unit to it instead?
I bought a kraton 6s V5 a few weeks ago. While the slt3 works great, it’s pretty cheap feeling. Any suggestion on what to jump up too for more comfort? In that regard knowing the slt3 works good for me?
My RC4GS v3 keeps losing range and car out of control or just stops working. Thinking might be the 6 x AA battery losing contact. Might get a 2s lipo for it.
Thanks for the review! Considering the RC8X is using the same protocol and receivers as the RC6GS/RC4GS the RC8X response is slower than the Noble NB4 and other high end radios. So it isn't just in your head! RC8X and NB4 are great radios but aren't for competitive racers.
@@jameswright5572 yea, human reaction time considers anything under 20ms immediate reaction time. Radiolink is rated at 12ms. The rest is in the driver's imagination. Scientific testing provided this stat not me.
hopefully they will pull down latency times with firmware over time , the latest noble nb4 update FW2.0.102(FCC Version) has certainly brought a huge step up in response time , so much so that its now so quick I've found it drives like a good race radio should and have stopped looking for a race specific radio..
Update February 9,2023, my radiolink RC8X connection problem happen when my transmitter is right beside the receiver (r8fg) 8 inch or less, you can still control steering but tx and receiver voltage displayed on my radio drop to null, and fluctuating signals. This will be a issue if you happen to be calibrating your car, at the beginning i assumed it would be the esc i am using, i test hobbywing 1080, tamiya esc, castle sidewinder and hobbywing xr10 all have same have the same signal dropout at very close proximity with the receivers, i am assuming either software issue or more likely hardware😬, i would suggest you guys with RC8X do your own testing, to avoid RC mishaps
Hi, sir. This is after-sales of RadioLink products. Thank you for your support. The problem is caused by signal block. RC8X comes with RadioLink R8FG receive, with two antennas. There is signal amplification in R8FG, so too close distance between the tranamitter and receiver will cause signal block even though the binding is finished. If the transmitter and R8FG receiver are too close, it is easy to cause signal block, and the binding cannot be successful. After the binding is successful, if transmitter and R8FG receiver are too close (for example, within 50 centimeters), the signal may be lost. Bring the transmitter and R8FG receiver farther apart, the signal loss will disappear automatically. So please do not keep R8FG receiver and transmitter too close when binding or operating the model. Sorry we did not let more people know about it. Actually we are planning take some tutorials on "signal block". We have already finished one video. Here is the video for your reference: ua-cam.com/video/zHs15ku7gcI/v-deo.html Hope it will be helpful for you to know what happened.
Hey Razor, are you still impressed? What about the servo response in your opinion? I have the RC8X by myself since a few days and I must say: I LIKE! But I'n not a competion driver...
Thank you for the video and I agree about the lack of micro receivers with jst-zh connectors (for 1:28 stuff). I use a rc4gs and r4fgm but the big jr connectors are clunky at that kind of scale. I imagine it'd not be that difficult for Radiolink to sell one and compete with nb4 there.
@@JasonUtomo That's the only way for rc4gs and rc6gs, but not sure if it works for rc8x. Even if it works it's still clunky for mini-z compared to proper solutions like nb4.
Just found your channel. Great content. Thinking about jumping back into the hobby. I'm from the Bay Area. What's popular race class at Norcal and good for beginners?
Man futaba won’t be happy . Looks a lot like there 7 and 10px in a way but a third of the price. And lots loved the old one with the good range. Hopefully is just as good range. Definitely going to try one out.
hey buddy love ur channel, i have a rustler and b6.2 also, ..but why on earth do people buy 5-6-7-8 channel radios for racing an rc car???? 3 channels sure even 4 for some ligts for the hobby guyts i get that but i dont get racers paying 2x 3x for radios with channels theyll never use ??? what am i missing?? need a radio for my b6.2 im not rich but it deserves something good any suggestions bro?
This seems like an excellent Tx for use with speedrun vehicles, especially considering the DSC port, and compatibility with CrossLink. Unfortunately...and, this will be considered a HUGE problem by some (including myself)...there doesn't appear to be ANY information related to actually using DSC/CrossLink. Their website mentions CrossLink ability, and they even show a photo of a CrossLink attached to the front of the Tx...but, there is NO other info to be found. The website has NO info, and the manual has NO info. I even emailed them about this, and asked for info...and, they NEVER BOTHERED to reply. I don't care how great a product might be...but, if they can't be bothered to include ALL info in the manual, and, even worse, of they refuse to respond to inquiries related to that much-needed info (ie. INCREDIBLY POOR customer service), then maybe it's a product not worth considering.
@@jameswright5572 I'm not going to agree, or disagree. All I'll say is, it sure would be nice...and helpful. However, Radiolink isn't the only Tx manufacturer to have released a trigger-style Tx with a Crossfire-compatible DSC port. Another manufacturer also has one (technically, two, as they have a recent 'new' V3, and an 'old' V2, both with DSC ports), yet they never released a "proper" tutorial video. On top of that, I don't recall any UA-camrs uploading any, either. I contacted both companies for info (preferably, for directions). While the other company did apply, the information they provided was somewhat minimal, and not of any real help. Radiolink, on the other hand, didn't even bother to respond...to me, that's very poor customer service.
@@robbryan3044 Works exactly like it did on the RC6GS. Lots of vids on that. 87 page instruction manual. I am not even a fan of of Radiolink. I can recognize when a company is trying and when they are resting on thier asses. None of the big boys are trying as hard at this point. I like an under dog.
@@jameswright5572 I'll look for those videos. Price-wise, I wouldn't care which I got. But, when it comes to build quality, the Radiolink looks better. Thanks for the info. 🤙🏼
@@jameswright5572 I found the video you were referring to. Unfortunately, the process described in the video is incorrect, as neither the RadioLinkMiniPix, nor a laptop, is needed. TBS has a stand-alone Rx (actually, they have two - 6Ch PWM Nano Rx & 8Ch Diversity Rx) that works with the Crossfire, for which eliminates the need for a "middleman" (ie. the Mini Pix). The 'problem' takes me back to the beginning, as I have been completely unable to find any info (from either Tx manufacturer) on settings needed to be done within the Tx, itself. TBS has been very helpful in providing info (which is also how I found out that the Mini Pix is completely unnecessary)...but, they have no info related to the settings within either Tx. And that leads me back to the point that RadioLink hasn't bothered to reply to my inquiry. It wouldn't be so bad if they replied just to say they're "not sure"...but, to completely ignore requests for info, that's even lower than "poor" customer service. I will email them again, and see if they reply back this time. Hopefully, I'll have a reply from them before the end of the week...time will tell.
I just received it 10 mins ago, did the speed test, super slow response, sluggish and poor latency on steering servo, I am very disappointed, slower than my old sanwa MX3FG, my best radio for reference i have right now sanwa MT44 and NB4 (i wish i have 7px to compare), both are exceptional in performance, but this one super super slow. I WILL NOT recommend this! Update as of February 8,2023, another issues i found out, jumping to different fhss v1 and v2 protocols (receiver) are not a good idea, for example bind connected to r8fg receiver with fhss v2 protocol saved, then you pre select different car with to R6fg fhss v1 protocol, it will not bind, you need to confirm again the fhss v1 (checked) protocol to v1 enter confirm before you can start using the assigned car, when going back to another with fhss vs 2 protocol you need to go again to receiver setting and select v2 enter confirmed. 😬😬😬😬Freaking complicated!! As long as you stayed fhss v2 saved receivers you will be fine. One more thing i found out, both receivers r8fg and r6fg losing binding connection (receiver voltage 7.4volts) with my kyosho USA1 esc( oem Hobbywing ), I used the sanwa and flysky receivers with no drop out on signals. Either this radiolink need a pretty stable firmware update or I don’t know.
@@jameswright5572 I was hoping to get a all around radio, but fell short for competitive circuit racing and drifting (my focus hobby at the moment), radiolink still use the same protocol from there previous model, even with a new faster processor it has it’s limit, i believe it have a amazing application for bashing, definitively for crawlers and other rc that require multifunctional controllers (8 channels) which doesn’t require that quick response.
@@skaargan you are welcome, if you are going to you use it for crawling, nitro, basher or anything doesn’t require competitive drift/racing, it should be ok.
Junk radio. Ignorant company. Major signal dropping issues with this problematic radio. Tried to help radiolink fix the issues for months and they did not collaborate with me. They blocked me from their pages and groups which also gets censored most of the time. They blame it in antenna placement or operator error ehich is clearly not. Super dangerous radio if you run into those issues.
Nice review though a basic one. The worry I had about this radio was with the latency/speed/response or however people choose to describe it and it appears it's in a range not to my personal liking so I'd never use it as a main radio. What I do appreciate is the extras this radio brings to the table compared to others as well as Radiolinks proven range capability. However for me, the overall size, speed and programmable features (servo frequency for example) of the Noble Pro will keep me locked into it for the foreseeable future.
Radio definitely looks very cool. 😍 nice review Razor. 👌
They absolutely do have micro Rx's for these, all backwards compatible. I run my Orlandoo's with my RC6GS. Throttle response on my RC6 is better than the Futaba 4PL that I replaced with it. Way more responsive than a buddies Spectrum 5ch. I would take the RC6 racing any day.
This thing, RC8X, is a wet dream to those of us that run everything from 5th scale to 35th.
If it wasn't so close to X-mas, and grocery prices weren't through the roof, I'd already have one on the way.
Like I mentioned, I mean something appropriate for 1/10 indoor racing. Sanwa RX-482, Futaba R204GF-E, or Spektrum SR2100 size.
@@RazorRC R4GM or R4F are measured at 25x13mm
Nice quick look. I bought this radio specifically for surface FPV, plenty of channels to control the vehicle, and enough left to control a gimble. The built in FPV display+DVR+cable ports is what sets this system apart from almost everything else. It is not a replacement for my 4PM, just fills a different roll. They do have nano rx available. I got a 6 pack of R4FGMs for less than a $100( about $17 each) They do have an antenna, they claim to still have 400 meters of range, and they are gyro equipped. The gyro is going to be nice in some of my rowdy 3s micro builds.
You roll n tumble your radios? Weird...
Radiolink does make a micro 4 channel rx. Use them in my 24th scale crawlers.
Nice to hear your opinion on the RC8X, I'm looking at buying one of these radios for my bashers and speedrun cars like my XO-1 since i don't have a radio for it yet and i really like all the features of it especially the gyro. If you're wondering i already own a Futaba 4PM original and so does my dad i just want something with more features, a gyro and great range but looking pro on a budget the RC8X certainly fits very well i can't wait to get mine next month.
No idea if you've gone and bought an RC8X yet, but a video I looked at for the 4PM indicates that the Futaba comes with an S-Bus receiver. Have you considered connecting a Futaba gyro unit to it instead?
I've got my eye on one of these, not sure how it'll work with the trx4 lights and bits and bobs. Thanks for the review 👍
if i tried to use this with an rc tank could i bind some of those dials to the turret control?
I bought a kraton 6s V5 a few weeks ago. While the slt3 works great, it’s pretty cheap feeling. Any suggestion on what to jump up too for more comfort? In that regard knowing the slt3 works good for me?
My RC4GS v3 keeps losing range and car out of control or just stops working. Thinking might be the 6 x AA battery losing contact. Might get a 2s lipo for it.
Thanks for the review! Considering the RC8X is using the same protocol and receivers as the RC6GS/RC4GS the RC8X response is slower than the Noble NB4 and other high end radios. So it isn't just in your head! RC8X and NB4 are great radios but aren't for competitive racers.
Thanks! A lot of people don’t notice anything different between the radios (true) and tell me that must mean these differences don’t exist (false).
@@RazorRC ua-cam.com/video/2cBxhEZHouM/v-deo.html 🤔🤔🤔
If you change the NB4 setting, from bi-directional, to 1-way (ie. getting rid of the telemetry), latency is all but eliminated.
Weird as I am winning comps with mine.
@@jameswright5572 yea, human reaction time considers anything under 20ms immediate reaction time. Radiolink is rated at 12ms. The rest is in the driver's imagination. Scientific testing provided this stat not me.
hopefully they will pull down latency times with firmware over time , the latest noble nb4 update FW2.0.102(FCC Version) has certainly brought a huge step up in response time , so much so that its now so quick I've found it drives like a good race radio should and have stopped looking for a race specific radio..
Update February 9,2023, my radiolink RC8X connection problem happen when my transmitter is right beside the receiver (r8fg) 8 inch or less, you can still control steering but tx and receiver voltage displayed on my radio drop to null, and fluctuating signals. This will be a issue if you happen to be calibrating your car, at the beginning i assumed it would be the esc i am using, i test hobbywing 1080, tamiya esc, castle sidewinder and hobbywing xr10 all have same have the same signal dropout at very close proximity with the receivers, i am assuming either software issue or more likely hardware😬, i would suggest you guys with RC8X do your own testing, to avoid RC mishaps
Hi, sir. This is after-sales of RadioLink products. Thank you for your support. The problem is caused by signal block. RC8X comes with RadioLink R8FG receive, with two antennas. There is signal amplification in R8FG, so too close distance between the tranamitter and receiver will cause signal block even though the binding is finished. If the transmitter and R8FG receiver are too close, it is easy to cause signal block, and the binding cannot be successful. After the binding is successful, if transmitter and R8FG receiver are too close (for example, within 50 centimeters), the signal may be lost. Bring the transmitter and R8FG receiver farther apart, the signal loss will disappear automatically. So please do not keep R8FG receiver and transmitter too close when binding or operating the model. Sorry we did not let more people know about it. Actually we are planning take some tutorials on "signal block". We have already finished one video. Here is the video for your reference: ua-cam.com/video/zHs15ku7gcI/v-deo.html Hope it will be helpful for you to know what happened.
Hey Razor, are you still impressed?
What about the servo response in your opinion?
I have the RC8X by myself since a few days and I must say: I LIKE!
But I'n not a competion driver...
Nice review. How would you compare this to the Futaba 4PM in terms of performance? Is the Futaba more reaponsive, more linear, etc?
the Futaba is a much better race radio, probably the best you can buy
Can this screen be seen in direct sunlight?
Thank you for the video and I agree about the lack of micro receivers with jst-zh connectors (for 1:28 stuff). I use a rc4gs and r4fgm but the big jr connectors are clunky at that kind of scale. I imagine it'd not be that difficult for Radiolink to sell one and compete with nb4 there.
But is it still possible to use this rc8x for mini z?
I still don’t know how to bind it to mini z besides that I have to buy separate multi protocol from I range x. Is there any other way?
@@JasonUtomo That's the only way for rc4gs and rc6gs, but not sure if it works for rc8x. Even if it works it's still clunky for mini-z compared to proper solutions like nb4.
@@sammybaka but still better than the original transmitter right?🤣
@@JasonUtomo Better quality and configurability, yes, but from my last measurement, sacrifices around 10ms of latency.
I need a good radio system for my fast electric boats. Would you take the Futaba 4PM over this RC8X?
4PM between those 2. But personally I'd go with NB4 flysky or radiomaster mt12
Any idea on the latency?
Just found your channel. Great content. Thinking about jumping back into the hobby. I'm from the Bay Area. What's popular race class at Norcal and good for beginners?
17.5t stock spec 2wd buggy is what you want to get into
@@RazorRC
How about spec slash? I wanted to race and bash around too.
Do you or will you have a roundup in the 200-300 range of radios including this? Pro’s/Con’s of each and which features stand out on each?
Yes
Such a nice radio one day ill definitely have one
Man futaba won’t be happy . Looks a lot like there 7 and 10px in a way but a third of the price. And lots loved the old one with the good range. Hopefully is just as good range. Definitely going to try one out.
Awesome remote and great review
Since I seen this receiver online I've been debating on getting this or the noble nb4. which one would you recommend out of those two in general?
rc8x has more features, the noble has better response/control
Hi razer rc nice video mate and good information on the handset
hey buddy love ur channel, i have a rustler and b6.2 also, ..but why on earth do people buy 5-6-7-8 channel radios for racing an rc car???? 3 channels sure even 4 for some ligts for the hobby guyts i get that but i dont get racers paying 2x 3x for radios with channels theyll never use ??? what am i missing??
need a radio for my b6.2 im not rich but it deserves something good any suggestions bro?
FSGT5/G7P is ok if you want something under $80. Futaba 3PV, if you afford it, is much more precise.
Fans? lol
Is this open TX?
That's for your reviews
Is it possible to calibre the display of the voltage for the battery on the car ? Is it accurate ? Thank's !
yes, it includes an xt60 battery cable to monitor battery voltage (I think up to 8s)
@@RazorRC thank's for the answer.
i got this radio finally and im loving it no issues at all.
This seems like an excellent Tx for use with speedrun vehicles, especially considering the DSC port, and compatibility with CrossLink. Unfortunately...and, this will be considered a HUGE problem by some (including myself)...there doesn't appear to be ANY information related to actually using DSC/CrossLink. Their website mentions CrossLink ability, and they even show a photo of a CrossLink attached to the front of the Tx...but, there is NO other info to be found. The website has NO info, and the manual has NO info. I even emailed them about this, and asked for info...and, they NEVER BOTHERED to reply. I don't care how great a product might be...but, if they can't be bothered to include ALL info in the manual, and, even worse, of they refuse to respond to inquiries related to that much-needed info (ie. INCREDIBLY POOR customer service), then maybe it's a product not worth considering.
Look for online tutorials. Radiolink puts them out regularly and users will have how to vids up quickly.
@@jameswright5572 I'm not going to agree, or disagree. All I'll say is, it sure would be nice...and helpful. However, Radiolink isn't the only Tx manufacturer to have released a trigger-style Tx with a Crossfire-compatible DSC port. Another manufacturer also has one (technically, two, as they have a recent 'new' V3, and an 'old' V2, both with DSC ports), yet they never released a "proper" tutorial video. On top of that, I don't recall any UA-camrs uploading any, either. I contacted both companies for info (preferably, for directions). While the other company did apply, the information they provided was somewhat minimal, and not of any real help. Radiolink, on the other hand, didn't even bother to respond...to me, that's very poor customer service.
@@robbryan3044 Works exactly like it did on the RC6GS. Lots of vids on that. 87 page instruction manual.
I am not even a fan of of Radiolink. I can recognize when a company is trying and when they are resting on thier asses.
None of the big boys are trying as hard at this point.
I like an under dog.
@@jameswright5572 I'll look for those videos. Price-wise, I wouldn't care which I got. But, when it comes to build quality, the Radiolink looks better. Thanks for the info. 🤙🏼
@@jameswright5572 I found the video you were referring to. Unfortunately, the process described in the video is incorrect, as neither the RadioLinkMiniPix, nor a laptop, is needed. TBS has a stand-alone Rx (actually, they have two - 6Ch PWM Nano Rx & 8Ch Diversity Rx) that works with the Crossfire, for which eliminates the need for a "middleman" (ie. the Mini Pix). The 'problem' takes me back to the beginning, as I have been completely unable to find any info (from either Tx manufacturer) on settings needed to be done within the Tx, itself. TBS has been very helpful in providing info (which is also how I found out that the Mini Pix is completely unnecessary)...but, they have no info related to the settings within either Tx. And that leads me back to the point that RadioLink hasn't bothered to reply to my inquiry. It wouldn't be so bad if they replied just to say they're "not sure"...but, to completely ignore requests for info, that's even lower than "poor" customer service. I will email them again, and see if they reply back this time. Hopefully, I'll have a reply from them before the end of the week...time will tell.
looks very close to a futaba7pxr copy
worried about tx sizie use crossfire
Hello, sir. RC8X can be connected to TBS Crossfire. May I know what you mean that you worry about tx size use crossfire?
You're not gonna mention it looks like an exact replica of the sanwa m17?
actually it looks more like a Futaba 7PX
It looks nothing like a sanwa m17! Not at all!
How in the hell is this only 250.00$ just bought one !!!
Still have it? What was your experience?
Think I'd probably crash while looking at all that crap
Would not recommend this junk radio to anyone. Random signal loss from bout 50% of them.
i’ve never lost signal even with a broken receiver antenna tip!!with no reception bars on the transmitter !!
@@ClipperGangFame sure you didn't lmao.
I just received it 10 mins ago, did the speed test, super slow response, sluggish and poor latency on steering servo, I am very disappointed, slower than my old sanwa MX3FG, my best radio for reference i have right now sanwa MT44 and NB4 (i wish i have 7px to compare), both are exceptional in performance, but this one super super slow. I WILL NOT recommend this! Update as of February 8,2023, another issues i found out, jumping to different fhss v1 and v2 protocols (receiver) are not a good idea, for example bind connected to r8fg receiver with fhss v2 protocol saved, then you pre select different car with to R6fg fhss v1 protocol, it will not bind, you need to confirm again the fhss v1 (checked) protocol to v1 enter confirm before you can start using the assigned car, when going back to another with fhss vs 2 protocol you need to go again to receiver setting and select v2 enter confirmed. 😬😬😬😬Freaking complicated!! As long as you stayed fhss v2 saved receivers you will be fine. One more thing i found out, both receivers r8fg and r6fg losing binding connection (receiver voltage 7.4volts) with my kyosho USA1 esc( oem Hobbywing ), I used the sanwa and flysky receivers with no drop out on signals. Either this radiolink need a pretty stable firmware update or I don’t know.
Interesting. Have had mine for a month and I don't even pick up my Spektrum anymore. For me performance has been outstanding.
@@jameswright5572 I was hoping to get a all around radio, but fell short for competitive circuit racing and drifting (my focus hobby at the moment), radiolink still use the same protocol from there previous model, even with a new faster processor it has it’s limit, i believe it have a amazing application for bashing, definitively for crawlers and other rc that require multifunctional controllers (8 channels) which doesn’t require that quick response.
thank you. i dodged a bullet here.
@@skaargan you are welcome, if you are going to you use it for crawling, nitro, basher or anything doesn’t require competitive drift/racing, it should be ok.
@@oliverstoys8411 nope. Im doing 1/8 and 1/10 buggy racing. Seems like a no for me
$399
Junk radio. Ignorant company. Major signal dropping issues with this problematic radio. Tried to help radiolink fix the issues for months and they did not collaborate with me. They blocked me from their pages and groups which also gets censored most of the time. They blame it in antenna placement or operator error ehich is clearly not. Super dangerous radio if you run into those issues.