Nearly Perfect - IWC Schaffhausen

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 101

  • @beetrootjunkie4178
    @beetrootjunkie4178 Рік тому +7

    This is IWC’s best model line. Great work IWC👍🏻

  • @BlueRam788
    @BlueRam788 Рік тому +9

    This is a stunning watch. Love to see more coverage of IWC. Great addition to your collection.

  • @michaelursone2037
    @michaelursone2037 Рік тому +1

    I have this exact piece! The bracelet is amazing! Love the brand. Their case finishing is unparalleled in its price range. The easy adjust clasp is great.

  • @watchmetwist
    @watchmetwist Рік тому +2

    Great video! Yes, I agree this watch is amazing. We can tell IWC has been putting a lot of effort into their newest releases.

  • @michaelkessler9467
    @michaelkessler9467 Рік тому +1

    I’m a layman and therefore wouldn’t dream on commenting on movements etc, however even I can tell that they have upped their game on this one compared to the previous Petit Prince, and as you mentioned, the price hasn’t changed dramatically.
    I was in a boutique just the other day and tried on both. My wrist is 22cm and I preferred the older model, but not only because it sat better - Aesthetically I felt the size of the crown and pushers looked too big and disproportionate on the 41mm compared to the 43mm

  • @swizzmamba8912
    @swizzmamba8912 Рік тому +3

    I adore my IWC pilot chrono over any other watch I own

  • @bryanwong9809
    @bryanwong9809 Рік тому +1

    Got the blue version in leather a month ago..I like leather more but a bit regret not getting the bracelet as it’s one of the best in the market. Totally agree with what you said-it’s really a beautiful watch and you have to see it in real to fully realise it. Mine is very accurate and only minus 10 seconds after 2 weeks, less than a second per day. I really appreciate this watch as you did.

  • @TFNv0197
    @TFNv0197 Рік тому +2

    I have the green version and I love it, I do agree with your opinion on the lume, if they did lume all the numerals it would have been amazing

  • @coffeeboyclips1973
    @coffeeboyclips1973 Рік тому +2

    Love this iwc, imo its the best looking chrono out there. I tried it on at the AD a few months ago and the watch looked amazing in the metal, really looked and felt like a high end piece. Definitely will be adding this to my collection in the future.

  • @kristiankohler9830
    @kristiankohler9830 Рік тому +2

    For this price all numerals should be lumed. Quite odd decision to not lime all numerals as this was a complai t from the previous version.
    To take away the anti-magnetic properties is a deal breaker for me.

  • @lplp1546
    @lplp1546 Рік тому +1

    Congratulations Bruce on your IWC. Very nice watch.

  • @gabrielfernandez4897
    @gabrielfernandez4897 Рік тому +2

    I agree with everything you've said. I just got the Le Petit Prince a few months ago and absolutely love it, BUT for the price an in house movement would've been nice. That being said 43mm works well for me and I am an electrical engineer in the power industry so I am definitely exposed to more em fields than most and like you said the new one is lacking in that department

    • @bboness713
      @bboness713 Рік тому

      There's always Omega if you want a watch impervious to electrical fields. IWC makes brilliant watches though, great pick!

  • @pendaranroberts4350
    @pendaranroberts4350 Рік тому +1

    Seems to be a little dust or something on the hour hand in those close zoom shots like at 6:20.

  • @leifdehio2151
    @leifdehio2151 Місяць тому

    That lume thing is a big issue for me and so is the lack of protection against magnetic fields. If these issues would be fixed, I'd go for an IWC Flieger Chrono immediately...

  • @bobbydazzler1780
    @bobbydazzler1780 Рік тому

    Got the call for the Mercedes titanium version. I’m intrigued given I’ve never seen it in the metal so I think I’ll give it a try out. Being titanium it won’t go with the steel bracelet which is a minus point but I quite like the two strap options. Let’s see how that goes. The blue dial is a pretty looking piece. IWC are making some very tempting pieces these days.

  • @santosallday25
    @santosallday25 Рік тому

    It is a fantastic piece. The height is a bit tall unless wearer has massive wrists. It reminds me of the tutor black bay from a couple years ago , around 14.5 mm height.

  • @Jdinaz
    @Jdinaz Рік тому +1

    Love my Big (big) Pilot LPP! IWC.. too expensive but much love for them.

  •  Рік тому

    Spot on!
    Applied indicies for some 3d effects on the dial that makes it even easier to read in some light situations and make those indicies full of lume, all of them!

  • @RyanVoight
    @RyanVoight 18 днів тому

    1 year later, how are you feeling on this watch? I'm heavily debating picking one up- biggest challenge is if I wait and add this to the few I have, or sell one and replace with this one. Does it feel versitile? Do you still love the blue? Have you at all wished you got the classic black? I'm also looking at one of the limited edition collective C,03 chronos with black dial and grey instead of white... it's very cool but more subdued, I dunno... I had the blue Mark XX and sold it for the black and was glad I did, so now I'm scared to commit to the blue chrono, but for some reason the chrono just seems right in blue, doesn't it?

  • @jeffreybialowas4637
    @jeffreybialowas4637 Рік тому +1

    IWC gives you probably the best bang for buck from 2 hands to perpetual along with JLC.

  • @greggeorgiou52
    @greggeorgiou52 Рік тому +1

    Very nice but I prefer it on leather strap green dial

  • @paulsteinbergassoc.1426
    @paulsteinbergassoc.1426 Рік тому

    Great coverage Bruce just bought the 43mm Chrono Green dial on brown calfskin plus the AD threw in the green rubber strap for free only problem is I had to purchase the clasp for $430 nothing I could do about that but absolutely love this watch!!!!

  • @ConstanTime
    @ConstanTime Рік тому

    I adore it. Great review! I have the old version and absolutely love it. I would get this in green in a heartbeat because I don’t see me ever selling my Le petite Prince!

  • @erikwitkowski
    @erikwitkowski 8 місяців тому

    This movement does not have a vertical clutch. It does have a column wheel.

  • @gyulapanszky7805
    @gyulapanszky7805 Рік тому +1

    Waiting for the mark xx to come out eith bracelet

  • @RJtoon1
    @RJtoon1 Рік тому

    Looks VERY similar to my Alpina chrono, even the blue dial colour

  • @Vess_Iossifov
    @Vess_Iossifov 10 місяців тому

    Hi, congratulations on the great watch! I am considering it but still have to decide if I can accept the size on my 6.5 inch wrist.
    One thing - I think it has lateral clutch, nit vertical.

  • @matthewmccord99
    @matthewmccord99 Рік тому

    Whoa...never really given IWC that close of a look. Pretty slick. Thanks.

  • @defenestratedone
    @defenestratedone Рік тому

    I never quite got the appeal of IWC but... I did register my interest in the new Mark XX on bracelet. I like the design of it, and with the new 5 days in house movement we'll see if I fall in love.

  • @GregJ1
    @GregJ1 Рік тому

    The movement is large and so they push the dial too close to the glass to reduce case thickness, a bit too much reflection and not enough blue which hurts the contrast between dial color and case bezel, has a grayish tone due to the sunburst design too, power reserve likely not quite up to modern standards, but much more positives than negatives, I like it overall, the IWC 43 is best in my book.

  • @scottwexlin6456
    @scottwexlin6456 Рік тому

    Really nice piece. The blue dial really works, along with the bracelet. My AD has IWC and I eyeball them when I go in. I’m sure I’ll be in one at some point in my watch journey.

  • @10ishq
    @10ishq Рік тому

    I wish this was available in a black dial and black day/date discs. In addition I wish maybe the dial would be used from the IWC x Collective C.03 or the Ceratanium 41. I think a silicon hairspring should be included but not a deal breaker. Otherwise it is the perfect chrono

  • @WernerEngel1
    @WernerEngel1 Рік тому

    it gets harder and harder to read the hands and date numbers on a watch, the older you get. For this purpose, it seems to be perfect!

  • @masterwatch
    @masterwatch 11 місяців тому

    this is a super classic pilot watch.

  • @tockingwatches2377
    @tockingwatches2377 Рік тому

    I haven’t had a chronograph in my collection yet, but this is tempting.

  • @pierr97430
    @pierr97430 Рік тому

    Nice watch. The only problem for me is that it is not anti magnetic. For an everyday watch I like to wear it without thinking too much about it (so it must be waterproof and anti magnetic)
    We are so surrounded by electronic equipment that it seems easy to me nowadays to magnetize a watch. Maybe I'm wrong

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому

      I like the idea of antimagnetic watches but truth be told I've never magnetized a watch... Even being around all the fields we are in daily. So it's not a deal breaker for me, but I do prefer it just for peace of mind

    • @tarjazz1
      @tarjazz1 Рік тому +1

      I did read somewhere that this watch has an anti-magnetic ring around the inside of the case, but that IWC reduced the anti-magnetic properties somewhat because many customers want the display caseback. I have the Spitfire Chrono in 41 with the same in-house movement. I like the bracelet and display back on this new model, but console myself with the Spitfire’s better anti-magnetic properties.

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому +1

      @@tarjazz1 it would be great if that is the case. Richemont has been known to do this in select Vacheron Constantine models

  • @bluedvl3820
    @bluedvl3820 Рік тому

    In the market for this or a sapphire speedy...and I'm a pilot so this makes my decision even more difficult

  • @Gumby56
    @Gumby56 Рік тому

    I'm not into busy watches but this watch is georgous!

  • @nealdranoff6426
    @nealdranoff6426 7 місяців тому

    The price jump on this watch to $8500. is about as outrageous as the recent JLC price increases. Very nice watch, but...

  • @DougFNJ
    @DougFNJ Рік тому

    Excellent review, I purchased this last week and have been enjoying it a lot. I love the bracelet, I have the brown straps to change the look. I’m not bothered by the lume at all, but the lack of antimagnetism is the 1 thing that I wish they addressed. So many devices, even my laptop bag use rare earth magnets. Great review Bruce!

    • @NeoWahNah
      @NeoWahNah 6 місяців тому

      Have you experienced issues with magnetizing your watch?

    • @DougFNJ
      @DougFNJ 6 місяців тому +1

      @@NeoWahNah
      I have. I also have demagnetizers for when it happens.

    • @NeoWahNah
      @NeoWahNah 6 місяців тому

      @@DougFNJ often? I'm considering buying this soon. But I'm worried about the lack of anti magnetic properties. Any pros or cons to share with your experience?
      Thank you!

    • @DougFNJ
      @DougFNJ 6 місяців тому +1

      @@NeoWahNah
      Not often enough to tell people not to get one. If it is a big enough concern though, the Spitfire models may be a good alternative, they have the farraday cage. If chronograph isn’t mandatory, have you looked at the Mark XX?

    • @NeoWahNah
      @NeoWahNah 6 місяців тому

      @DougFNJ Not exactly. I'm finding things to complain about at this point. I love the look of the Pilot chronograph. At this point, I'm sure it's the IWC I want. 2 things bother me, though, the shorter hands on the 41 and the lack of magnetic resistance.
      We enthusiasts are a funny bunch. I'm sure you know how it is!

  • @michaelchan1164
    @michaelchan1164 Рік тому

    Bruuuuuuce! Great video as always. I’m thinking between this and the speedmaster. Hard to pick! Anyway, always appreciate your videos and can’t wait to see our boys playing against the bears and Trey Lance this year.

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому +2

      Same here. Sunday can't come soon enough!
      IWC no doubt a nicer watch than a Speedy. Speedy no doubt a more iconic model that has more general appeal

    • @willhum9162
      @willhum9162 Рік тому

      These are also my two shortlisted rn. Interested to know why u think the IWC is a nicer watch over speedy? Just aesthetics?

  • @scottlauren3145
    @scottlauren3145 Рік тому

    That really is a sey watch. Close to perfect. I would like it a bit smaller.

  • @user-gm7lz9lq5x
    @user-gm7lz9lq5x Рік тому

    Sometimes mine stops when starting the chrono.

  • @Tyler-sl6vg
    @Tyler-sl6vg Рік тому

    Really glad you reviewed this one Bruce. It was on my short list for a while.

  • @jonhettrick7969
    @jonhettrick7969 3 місяці тому

    Very nice!!

  • @sadaka201
    @sadaka201 Рік тому

    Great watch! One on my list!

  • @drbobsnightmare2521
    @drbobsnightmare2521 Рік тому

    It's nice, but I like the IWC big pilot perpetual calendar. I need a cure, that's ludicrous money.

  • @N2GLOCK1
    @N2GLOCK1 11 місяців тому

    Seems as if the case is a bit too thick?

  • @alanalbright69
    @alanalbright69 Рік тому

    Perfect would be having the date window color the same as the dial! That is my biggest complaint about IWC. Some times they do it and other times they don’t. I don’t understand why

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому

      Probably for contrast/ease of reading

    • @valjean3141
      @valjean3141 Рік тому

      This is an interesting issue, and caught my eye as well. I believe that they did use a color-matched date wheel on the last generation, and then deliberately reverted from that. Personally, I can’t decide which way I like the dial better.

  • @michaelriera6277
    @michaelriera6277 Рік тому +1

    It’s ok

  • @ads-porewealth96
    @ads-porewealth96 Рік тому

    For me The problem is the bracelet, just doesn’t suit that watch somehow. The leather strap it comes with it flimsy as well. Its so good other than its bracelets/ strap game.

    • @larryfishkind5387
      @larryfishkind5387 Рік тому

      Beautiful watch I agree exactly with what you said the bracelet does not fit that watch and the dial is so beautiful it’s a shame they didn’t perfect this

    • @scott7841
      @scott7841 Рік тому

      They have a rubber strap option as well, if you don't like the leather strap or bracelet.

  • @magneticman2003
    @magneticman2003 Рік тому

    I just purchased one with the leather strap. Its very comfortable and am Super happy with it. Thanks for your honest and very cool review;-))

  • @nkonig1
    @nkonig1 Рік тому +1

    The things I can guarantee in any BW video. The mention of light play and anti reflective coating.

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому +1

      And the showing of macro shots and how every watch needs a good bracelet 😂

    • @nkonig1
      @nkonig1 Рік тому +1

      @@BruceWilliams indeed! “Facets” is another one! Perhaps a BW drinking game could be devised.

  • @jodysilvia2
    @jodysilvia2 Рік тому

    Beautiful watch Bruce.

  • @markstewart8232
    @markstewart8232 Рік тому

    Hi Bruce - great review. I've just bought the same piece here in the UK, with the bracelet plus the blue leather strap. What sort of accuracy are you getting? Have you tested gains/losses over any period of time?

    • @NeoWahNah
      @NeoWahNah 6 місяців тому

      How are you enjoying your waych?

  • @affegorilla1299
    @affegorilla1299 Рік тому

    Let`s compare this to the Jaeger Polaris Chronograph PLS:)

  • @shaunfarrier9060
    @shaunfarrier9060 Рік тому

    BW - I'd love to see a head-to-head between this and the Tudor BB chrono.

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 Рік тому +1

      Tudor can't be compared to this, iwc is in a different league

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому +4

      Agreed with Coffee Boy Clips. Not a fair comparison. IWC nicer all around

  • @Sparkadian
    @Sparkadian Рік тому

    Bravo 👏👏

  • @jamisonjamison1
    @jamisonjamison1 Рік тому +1

    not a fan of the display caseback. prefer the 3717 or the 3706. too many "new" watches in your collection for my taste

  • @jaredcoffin3907
    @jaredcoffin3907 Рік тому

    10k+ but only 62 comments. What up with that? Why such a disparity?

  • @Microwave414
    @Microwave414 Рік тому

    I think for $7900 it better be near perfect.

  • @doperdr
    @doperdr Рік тому

    hey Bruce, which watch is that you wearing at 8:45 ?

  • @DennisC_X
    @DennisC_X Рік тому

    How’s the thickness compare to the Sub? I know the spec differences, but don’t have “real world experience” with the IWC 41 Chrono.

    • @BruceWilliams
      @BruceWilliams  Рік тому +1

      No Chrono will ever feel as thin as a sub which is one of the most of not the most comfortable diver on the market

    • @mijnbuisje
      @mijnbuisje Рік тому

      @@BruceWilliams until the Pelagos 39 got released that is.

  • @diydad7704
    @diydad7704 Рік тому

    Bit too much home shopping tv compared to the amount of information on the watch.

  • @wayneguy6043
    @wayneguy6043 Рік тому

    I would do one for $4,000

  • @hfuffvnjvnijd8989
    @hfuffvnjvnijd8989 Рік тому

    there is dust on the hands!!! its a new 10k watch.....

  • @ajayvakil9638
    @ajayvakil9638 Рік тому

    the 43 is back in house and very overpriced...7800!

  • @mikelawrence6840
    @mikelawrence6840 Рік тому +2

    iwc vastly overpriced

    • @jayvakil1935
      @jayvakil1935 Рік тому

      8500..might as well get a Rolex

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 Рік тому

      All luxury watches are overpriced, iwc are one of the best so worth it

    • @coffeeboyclips1973
      @coffeeboyclips1973 Рік тому +1

      @@jayvakil1935 Rolex is overrated, they are only popular because of resale

  • @gyulapanszky7805
    @gyulapanszky7805 Рік тому +6

    Lugs toooooooo long…

  • @uksquall
    @uksquall 9 місяців тому

    Disliked for the garbage music at the start.