Guys... There are no CG hairs in those shots😊 The movie came up in 1998. The first big hair simulation was made for Monsters ink in 2001. And it was cartoon with no live action scenes😂
"According to Terry Gilliam's commentary on the Criterion Collection DVD, they shot this scene a few months after the scene where they first picked him up, and could not get Maguire to shave his head for the wig. It would have cost $15,000 extra to put that in his contract initially, but they opted not to, because the movie was already becoming over budget. They ended up spending well over that using a bald cap and make-up effects, as well as using computer editing to erase the line on his forehead." from IMDB.
The hair on Tobey Maguire can't be CGI. It came out in 1998. The best CGI at that time was Titanic and Godzilla, and today they are obvious when it's CGI. Also hair is one of the biggest challenges of animation, and Monsters Inc was the first realistic CG hair 3 years later. Its a bald cap and a wig
I was surprised at the self rising bread. In Star Trek 5 the prop department came up with a self-lighting cigarette. It tooks months and cost about 5 thousand dollars. They never used it in the film.
OK the food from Universal soldier that Jean Claude eats at the bar has always looked so yummy😂 the way he smiles as he eats plate after plate, I wish good tasted that good all the time. Something funny I've always thought when watching it 😊
Judy Garland actually had to a total CGI hair replacement playing Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz (1939). Toto was also a mix of animatronics and deepfake CGI
it took 3 months to develop fast-rising bread? what a huge waste of time & resources for something that 99% of people would just assume is CGI anyway (and 100% of people didn't care)
Why would Raimi make Maguire do 162 takes to get that scene right when it could be done digitally and leave them both free to get on with the rest of the filming? I smell bullshit.
@timothyexner Jesus dude. That doesn't change the fact the comparison I was making was that the cgi looked like ps3 visuals not that's the ps3 came our in 01.
The film industry need to go back a few steps and bring back practical FX. Having special effects that are done in-camera ALWAYS hold up better than any CGI garbage to this very day. I wanted a career in a model shop back in the day. Now that I think about it, maybe I'll start kit-bashing again.
Wrong, everyone knows Stanley Kubrick wasn't happy with how the effects looked and was such a sticker for detail that he had his team build an advanced space shuttle and space station because he had to film on location, same happened when he was hired for teh Apollo missions, they had to go to the moon in order to stage them.
OMG is this video convoluted... It's all over the freaking place! Movie special effects are very hard to compose so if you want to show them to your viewers, focus on that; don't sprinkle it amid other unrelated takes. Geez that was painful to watch!
Guys... There are no CG hairs in those shots😊 The movie came up in 1998. The first big hair simulation was made for Monsters ink in 2001. And it was cartoon with no live action scenes😂
I was gonna say, that looks way too good to be digital in that age
"According to Terry Gilliam's commentary on the Criterion Collection DVD, they shot this scene a few months after the scene where they first picked him up, and could not get Maguire to shave his head for the wig. It would have cost $15,000 extra to put that in his contract initially, but they opted not to, because the movie was already becoming over budget. They ended up spending well over that using a bald cap and make-up effects, as well as using computer editing to erase the line on his forehead." from IMDB.
@@chuckpereda this is more realistic. Still difficult as hell, but realistic)
They have included this false fact in multiple videos and no matter how many times I comment they just keep adding it to future lists 😂
@@VFXProductionsRT That's because people can't think on their own anymore.
Yeah no that isn't CGI hair on Toby, that's a wig and the cgi was just to erase the edge where it meets his forehead.
T2 is still one of the GOATs
I never would have guessed that a slide was used in the bathtub of "Mary Poppins Returns", making it even more impressive.
Looks fun
Never saw Candyman, but thar bee scene is crazy AF. Rest in peace, Kurn, son of Mogh.
You should see it. If not for the stunningly amazing Virginia Madsen alone, it's an extremely psychological thriller.
The hair on Tobey Maguire can't be CGI. It came out in 1998. The best CGI at that time was Titanic and Godzilla, and today they are obvious when it's CGI. Also hair is one of the biggest challenges of animation, and Monsters Inc was the first realistic CG hair 3 years later. Its a bald cap and a wig
There is also a floating pen trick in 2010. Also with a sheet of glass.
Bees in the mouth! OMG! Tony Todd was an underappreciated legend.
Right, but 23000. wasn’t for his troubles wasn’t enough
I was surprised at the self rising bread.
In Star Trek 5 the prop department came up with a self-lighting cigarette. It tooks months and cost about 5 thousand dollars. They never used it in the film.
OK the food from Universal soldier that Jean Claude eats at the bar has always looked so yummy😂 the way he smiles as he eats plate after plate, I wish good tasted that good all the time. Something funny I've always thought when watching it 😊
the seam for the bald cap is VERY visible, its just lower on his forehead than most folks are looking
Reportedly, Kevin Costner had CGI hair added in Waterworld (1995)
The squibs on the T1000 were made of foam rubber that was painted silver.
Tony Todd got paid!
Judy Garland actually had to a total CGI hair replacement playing Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz (1939). Toto was also a mix of animatronics and deepfake CGI
it took 3 months to develop fast-rising bread? what a huge waste of time & resources for something that 99% of people would just assume is CGI anyway (and 100% of people didn't care)
I thought the lunch tray catch scene from Spider-Man as a nod to DC's Showcase #4 where Barry Allen (the Flash) did a similar catch at a diner.
Why would Raimi make Maguire do 162 takes to get that scene right when it could be done digitally and leave them both free to get on with the rest of the filming?
I smell bullshit.
Do you understand how much more expensive it would have been?
There are also ruined scenes on the Internet
Your nose is not working.
@kanukki84 I don't understand. It's more expensive to do it digitally than practically?
@@WaddedBliss in 2000 yes, it would have looked really fake, they had a hard time with the web swinging looking like cgi cutscenes from a ps3 game.
@timothyexner Jesus dude. That doesn't change the fact the comparison I was making was that the cgi looked like ps3 visuals not that's the ps3 came our in 01.
@@ThisWeekInStupid Except the rest of the film is CGI heavy. The Maguire stunt would've cost pennies by comparison.
During the dialog of popculture time travel tropes in Endgame, no one mentioned Doctor Who?!?
The film industry need to go back a few steps and bring back practical FX. Having special effects that are done in-camera ALWAYS hold up better than any CGI garbage to this very day. I wanted a career in a model shop back in the day. Now that I think about it, maybe I'll start kit-bashing again.
the T1000 was quite obvious even at the time.
Wrong, everyone knows Stanley Kubrick wasn't happy with how the effects looked and was such a sticker for detail that he had his team build an advanced space shuttle and space station because he had to film on location, same happened when he was hired for teh Apollo missions, they had to go to the moon in order to stage them.
It's real hair with his natural hairline removed with cgi.
Fire HOSE...
Do you not know what a hydrant is??
Tony Todd wins Hollywood
Digital hair in fear and loathing? Total bs.
OMG is this video convoluted... It's all over the freaking place! Movie special effects are very hard to compose so if you want to show them to your viewers, focus on that; don't sprinkle it amid other unrelated takes. Geez that was painful to watch!
you talk too much