I bought this lens in 2011 when i was still using Canon. I sold off my canon gear and made the switch to Fujifilm in 2017, but always kept this particular lens cause i loved it so much. This video just reminded to grab it from my storage and use the new adaptors available with autofocus on my Fuji cams.
We have shot commercial video (and some short films) with this lense since 2009. This is our go-to for 16-years of pro, non-broadcast production. Even for our Canon C500. It just rocks. If you've got the model with image stabilzer. Except for wide angle shots (Tokina) we can't recommend this enough. It's like the Cesna 172 of lenses.
Love this lens but recently have noticed how sharpness and contrast is really lacking compared to more modern lenses. I would keep it for photography but for video it’s a no go
I have the Tamron f/2.8 24-70 with "VC". Using my M6 mark II, I can use the mount adapter with the crop factor. If I use the speedbooster, I can get 17mm shots at f/2. I have never used this Canon lens. The Tamron makes hand held shots easy.
I would also choose Tamron over this. Better image quality, has stabilisation, smaller and lighter. Have to buy Canon very carefully, especially on internet. Most have been heavily used so there is big proportion of them with damage (internal - affecting image quality, external- bent rims).
I have the 2.8 24-70 G1 Tamron on R6 it works but not so sharp at times, especially if I stop down 5.6f seems like it doesn’t focus anywhere sometimes.
I am sometimes not really happy about sharpness with my 28-135mm in cases like landscape photography on my 6d mii, also in street photography or portraits it often just looks like my subject is out of focus even if i am perfectly in focus it often looks like it isnt really. Do u think a 24-70 or 24-105 used could be a good choice for me?
Maybe the 24-105mm would be a better choice, as you might miss the longer reach (135mm) if you go with the 24-70mm. The 24-105mm is a practical lens with good sharpness.
The lens from this video is probably the most essential lens for weddings (if you can find a used one). It helps in most situations. On top of that, a Full Frame camera will be needed for good results, since it has a big sensor, good in low light. So the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 and a Canon 6D will provide a good start if you're on a budget.
I’m always getting a halo/flary look on my images no matter how well I focus on subjects. I looked to make sure it’s clean, seems like nothing is wrong. Can never produce sharp images anymore
I have a similar issue with another (older) Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens - the left side of the image is always blurred. This happens at focal lengths between 24-35mm. There's a good chance that both my lens and yours were dropped at some point, causing some of the internal elements to become misaligned.
To fix that you have to adjust the lens element. Remove the front rubber ring you will have access to the 3 eccentric collars. I believe you can access them when you zoom is set at 24mm. Slightly adjust those collar with a screwdriver while having it focused on a focus chart. Then just adjust accordingly while being in live view(if camera has video features).
The R8 is definitely better, enjoy it! If you want to use EF lenses (Canon Full Frame DSLR lenses), you'll still need the EF to EOS R adapter - if not, just get native RF mount lenses for your R8, where no adapter is needed. All the best!
@@deebescootin I just tried it on my R8, it can't focus with an adapter. I wanted an better quality than my Tamron 24-70 f2.8, but as i said, it didn't work.
I have had this lens for over 12 years… good lens except for the aperture cable. Has broken 2 times. I expected better quality from a canon L series lens.
What do you think about the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8?
Mine performs very well on my Sony A7ii, i am still using it for all of my studio and event photography.
@@dizzydomingo7436 Nice! Glad to hear that!
The older lens does has it characteristics love mines minus this lens extends when zoominG but it worth it. Got mines for $400 in FB marketplace.
@@ZsuzexZux Great!
It wont focus with an original adapter and my R8.
I bought this lens in 2011 when i was still using Canon. I sold off my canon gear and made the switch to Fujifilm in 2017, but always kept this particular lens cause i loved it so much. This video just reminded to grab it from my storage and use the new adaptors available with autofocus on my Fuji cams.
Great! Thanks for sharing this. I'm glad you kept your 24-70mm f/2.8 L lens.
We have shot commercial video (and some short films) with this lense since 2009. This is our go-to for 16-years of pro, non-broadcast production. Even for our Canon C500. It just rocks. If you've got the model with image stabilzer. Except for wide angle shots (Tokina) we can't recommend this enough. It's like the Cesna 172 of lenses.
Its my first L lens and I found a great deal and use with Canon 6D. Even though its heavy, it is super versatile!
Love this lens but recently have noticed how sharpness and contrast is really lacking compared to more modern lenses. I would keep it for photography but for video it’s a no go
Thanks for sharing this!
WIll you go for sigma 24-70mm art then?
@@kylehalim5957 Yes definitely going for Sigma
I hear that the sigma and tamron are decently less sharp compared to canons mkii but I think I will sacrifice that for image stablization
@@z8318 nah man. Sigma art 24-70 is crazy sharp.
I have the Tamron f/2.8 24-70 with "VC". Using my M6 mark II, I can use the mount adapter with the crop factor. If I use the speedbooster, I can get 17mm shots at f/2. I have never used this Canon lens. The Tamron makes hand held shots easy.
I would also choose Tamron over this. Better image quality, has stabilisation, smaller and lighter. Have to buy Canon very carefully, especially on internet. Most have been heavily used so there is big proportion of them with damage (internal - affecting image quality, external- bent rims).
@@rolandsv8 mpb and keh have been my places for EF lenses.
I have the 2.8 24-70 G1 Tamron on R6 it works but not so sharp at times, especially if I stop down 5.6f seems like it doesn’t focus anywhere sometimes.
I am sometimes not really happy about sharpness with my 28-135mm in cases like landscape photography on my 6d mii, also in street photography or portraits it often just looks like my subject is out of focus even if i am perfectly in focus it often looks like it isnt really. Do u think a 24-70 or 24-105 used could be a good choice for me?
Maybe the 24-105mm would be a better choice, as you might miss the longer reach (135mm) if you go with the 24-70mm. The 24-105mm is a practical lens with good sharpness.
I want to shoot wedding photography but am a student on a budget, what are some lenses you recommended for ef canon cameras
The lens from this video is probably the most essential lens for weddings (if you can find a used one). It helps in most situations. On top of that, a Full Frame camera will be needed for good results, since it has a big sensor, good in low light. So the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 and a Canon 6D will provide a good start if you're on a budget.
De când așteptăm, urmează să îl cumpăr ,am vândut 24-105 f4
I’m always getting a halo/flary look on my images no matter how well I focus on subjects. I looked to make sure it’s clean, seems like nothing is wrong. Can never produce sharp images anymore
I have a similar issue with another (older) Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 lens - the left side of the image is always blurred. This happens at focal lengths between 24-35mm. There's a good chance that both my lens and yours were dropped at some point, causing some of the internal elements to become misaligned.
To fix that you have to adjust the lens element. Remove the front rubber ring you will have access to the 3 eccentric collars. I believe you can access them when you zoom is set at 24mm. Slightly adjust those collar with a screwdriver while having it focused on a focus chart. Then just adjust accordingly while being in live view(if camera has video features).
Does it work with canon eos r50?
It will work if you have the EF to EOS R mount adapter.
I just went & got the R8 instead
The R8 is definitely better, enjoy it! If you want to use EF lenses (Canon Full Frame DSLR lenses), you'll still need the EF to EOS R adapter - if not, just get native RF mount lenses for your R8, where no adapter is needed. All the best!
@@deebescootin I just tried it on my R8, it can't focus with an adapter. I wanted an better quality than my Tamron 24-70 f2.8, but as i said, it didn't work.
I have had this lens for over 12 years… good lens except for the aperture cable. Has broken 2 times. I expected better quality from a canon L series lens.
If you repair the cable it needs to be attached with strong double sided tape inside the barrel so that it won't snag when you zoom in and out.
24-105mm F2.8L is the new hype
Yes, the RF 24-105mm f/2.8L is a nice one. It's very expensive, though, but nice.