F-15 Eagle - The Most Gangster Fighter Jet Of All Time | OFFICE BLOKES REACT!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лют 2024
  • Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @officeblokes
    linktr.ee/TheOfficeBlokes
    Comment Below with More Reaction Ideas!
    Show some support and sign up to our Patreon for exclusive videos not on UA-cam, Access to our Banned Videos and to guarantee we react to your request
    Email - officeblokesreact@gmail.com
    Link to original video: • F-15 Eagle - The Most ...
    Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS

КОМЕНТАРІ • 237

  • @scottbaron121
    @scottbaron121 4 місяці тому +204

    LOL! Shooting down one of our OWN satellites, with a FIGHTER JET, in order to PROVE A POINT to the Soviets. That's as gangster as it gets.

    • @colonelilbrink8544
      @colonelilbrink8544 4 місяці тому +12

      Nah. Scoring the only air to air kill with a bomb is on some COD shit!

    • @SoonerStoneAI
      @SoonerStoneAI 4 місяці тому +6

      With a hypersonic missile…in the 80s.

    • @tvdroid22
      @tvdroid22 3 місяці тому +5

      And that was in the mid 1980's.

    • @ravex24
      @ravex24 3 місяці тому +5

      Since done it with a warship, too

    • @ravex24
      @ravex24 3 місяці тому

      @@ThinGibbons The USS Lake Erie did it in 2008.

  • @eddawg79
    @eddawg79 4 місяці тому +178

    The pilot that landed the F-15 missing a wing said he adjusted the throttle a little and didn't even know he was missing the wing until he landed.

    • @GreenSargent
      @GreenSargent 4 місяці тому +16

      I’ve heard that and it was an Israeli F-15 as well.

    • @DivusMagus
      @DivusMagus 4 місяці тому +20

      That's the equivalent of losing both tires on one side and not even noticing until you stop to get gas. That's insane engineering to make something like that possible.

    • @aerospacematt9147
      @aerospacematt9147 3 місяці тому +10

      He knew he’d lost a bit of the wing, actually lost control for a second and considered ejecting but decided against it after adding power and recovering. The plume of fuel escaping from the ruptured fuel tank obscured his view and the view of the backseater (it was a 2 seat trainer) Only after landing and turning around to shake the backseater’s hand did he see the full extent.

    • @spicysnowman8886
      @spicysnowman8886 3 місяці тому +5

      The fuselage on a f15 acts as a lifting body, it was one of the first jets to do that. I imagine it probably wouldn't have been able to land safely without that extra lift.

    • @aerospacematt9147
      @aerospacematt9147 3 місяці тому +7

      @@spicysnowman8886 Agreed. Post flight engineering analysis showed the fuselage provided 60 percent of the total lift.

  • @Ender7j
    @Ender7j 3 місяці тому +45

    Retired F15E crew chief here. The E-model is the penultimate fighter-bomber, fast and capable. I got the privilege of getting a ride in one when I was a young airman. Fucking phenomenal experience.

    • @robertlassiter907
      @robertlassiter907 3 місяці тому +3

      I was an electrician on A/B’s at Langley 76-80. Never got a ride though. Went to working on F-16’s at McDill and Kunsan. Got a ride at Kunsan and had to divert to Osan, so ended up getting two rides. F-15 was my favorite. Hope your memories are as good as mine. Well done, guy!

  • @kentancock6587
    @kentancock6587 4 місяці тому +114

    You can’t go wrong with anything the Fat Electrician puts out, he does his research.Glad to see you guys back.

  • @michaelmetz3131
    @michaelmetz3131 4 місяці тому +61

    So glad you gents have discovered The Fat Electrician. He’s the best storyteller in the game. LOTS more reactions from him please. 😀. Especially some of the ones about Jake McNasty and some other legendary military men. Good stuff.

  • @knowack2843
    @knowack2843 4 місяці тому +29

    At St. Louis Missouri, Lambert International Airport where the F-15s are produced, the straight-up vertical takeoff is called a "Viking Departure". When you hear one requested from ATC, you know you're in for a show!

  • @TRZN91
    @TRZN91 4 місяці тому +58

    Do his vid on Cassius Clay next. One of my favorite American historical figures, criminally underrated & Fat Electrician really does his story justice, what little videos essays you can find on him are a tad dry & often miss things. His vid however really sell the grandness of it all.

    • @Austin.Kilgore
      @Austin.Kilgore 4 місяці тому +4

      I really want them to react to American War Horse Marine or the video about the pirates and ending any “potential” threats.

    • @PulsingKrugotvoid
      @PulsingKrugotvoid 3 місяці тому +3

      ​@Austin.Kilgore those 2 would be "Sgt reckless" and "the barbry wars" if they wanna look those up

  • @kylemccullough3495
    @kylemccullough3495 4 місяці тому +33

    the Pilot who lost his wing didn't know he was missing the wing until after he landed. He was going to eject but after throwing it into afterburn he was able to stop the rolling and regained control of the aircraft. He landed at twice the normal speed and almost ran out of runway. it was an Israeli, i highly suggest checking out the video to hear his account.

    • @4325air
      @4325air 4 місяці тому +2

      Well written. All you write is totally correct. I clearly remember when this happened and I was informed about it.

    • @aerospacematt9147
      @aerospacematt9147 3 місяці тому +3

      Didn’t the emergency tail hook break off on the runway while trying to stop?

  • @krash66
    @krash66 3 місяці тому +10

    Hey Guys! This is the fighter plane that says, "F__k around and find out, dude".
    I used to work in a small office near the end of the runway in Syracuse, NY. A few times a week the Air National Guard squadron called "The Boys from Syracuse" used to take off in the late morning 3 or 4 times a week. Usually 4 F-16 "Fighting Falcons". They would take-off, get in formation, turn north, then hit the afterburners.... and they were gone out of sight in seconds, and the F-15 is even faster! Crazy.

  • @davidboivin7996
    @davidboivin7996 3 місяці тому +10

    The F-15's little brother, the F-16 has a Combat Record of 76-1.

  • @knotfinley
    @knotfinley 3 місяці тому +7

    Love Fat Electrician's sayings especially this one "It's never a war crime the first time".

  • @ethanberg1
    @ethanberg1 4 місяці тому +15

    If you think the C-17 is big (and it is, no doubt) just wait until you see the C-5 Galaxy (or the Super Galaxy variant). It's insane!

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer 3 місяці тому

      F’ing ridiculous, not insane.

    • @Bladerunner4924764
      @Bladerunner4924764 3 місяці тому

      Yes, the C-5 is very big, but the Antanov is bigger still. Sadly, I believe it was destroyed in the Russian/ Ukraine War.

  • @mcseforsale
    @mcseforsale 4 місяці тому +15

    I grew up with an A-10 squadron doing maneuvers over our neighborhood. Coolest warplane ever created, IMO. Needless to say, we felt pretty safe in the late 70s and 80s. Then, it was comforting during 9/11 since we were within a 20 min. plane ride from NYC.

  • @heathermcteer9581
    @heathermcteer9581 4 місяці тому +4

    The incredible smarts and intelligence of the men and women who figured this out bravo 👏👏👏

  • @xRa01
    @xRa01 4 місяці тому +11

    watch til the end, He sometimes dose something in the last 5 seconds normally funny as hell

  • @opencarry3860
    @opencarry3860 3 місяці тому +4

    McDonnell Douglas hit a home run with the F-15 Eagle. 1960s design and still an amazing machine.

  • @towermonkey5563
    @towermonkey5563 3 місяці тому +3

    The F-15 really is no joke. I worked with a crew chief after he cross trained to my career field in the AF who was assigned to F-15's. Apparently we had a joint training exercise with Canada at one point that pitted F-15s against twice their number of Canadian F-18s. Initial long range missile exchange favored the Canadians taking down half the 15s. The remaining 15s, then outnumbered 4 to 1, closed in for the dog fight and utterly wrecked the 18s without losing any more planes. The 15 is a highly, highly capable plane.

  • @firefighterchick
    @firefighterchick 4 місяці тому +9

    Of course I missed you guys!!
    So glad you guys are back.😊
    He is a great story teller.
    Virginia Hall the deadliest spy of WWII from his channel is excellent.

  • @goatitisful
    @goatitisful Місяць тому +1

    Waiting for Daz to say "I love this, me." It won't take long

  • @atoriusv5070
    @atoriusv5070 Місяць тому +1

    The F-15 may seem small, but with a full combat load it weighs almost 70k lbs. That's an Abrams tank flying through the air! Also, although technology has advanced there's not much that's changed in aircraft design. The F-15 and F-16 are excellent air frames, which is why they've just been upgrading them with new alloy wings, sensors, weapons, radar, and weapons. Plus having a consistent manufacturing system for so long makes it exceptionally cheaper and easier to continue using or making more of. When you've got such an absolutely stellar air frame, unless there's something utterly beyond the line of technological supremacy it's better to use them for general use and have the high tech options for special circumstances or emergencies due to cost. It'd cost 4-10 times as much to use an F-22 compared to an F-15 so unless it's necessary, it's best to use the cheaper incredibly durable and heavily armed option. Plus, it doesn't use stealth because it's used as an open signal of "Hey everyone, we're here so stop whatever you're doing and back off."

  • @russellgtyler8288
    @russellgtyler8288 4 місяці тому +2

    I grew up around SAC bases. I've watched a lot of B-52s take off over the years, and I'm still amazed when they finally start to lift and the wings rise and shes gone.

  • @jimmiegiboney2473
    @jimmiegiboney2473 Місяць тому

    12:38 Mark! 3.6K Thumbs Up + Mine! 👍 You're welcome, and thanks! 😊
    Notes: Amazing! 🎉 Hmm.
    The F-16 Falcon eventually had "Fighting" added to the name. The F-15 Eagle had "Strike" added. But he didn't mention that. 🤔 Hmm.
    With cars, people would say something like, "That's a Nineteen-Sixty-Four Ford Mustang and that's a Two-Thousand Ford Thunderbird!"
    But with airplanes, like he said, the decade an airplane debuted is what is said along with adding a letter after the number. That letter designates the model. 🤔

  • @JNJ1983
    @JNJ1983 4 місяці тому +2

    My fave Fat Electrician vids are of the Proportional one, the one about Sgt. Reckless, and the one about the SR-71.

  • @heydadchannel
    @heydadchannel 3 місяці тому +1

    Cool! I actually worked on the F-15 program in 1979 as an Engineering co-op student at McDonnell-Douglas in St. Louis Missouri. My first co-op semester I worked in the F-15 radar group. I got to go into the factory to see production, and watch them (and F-18 Hornets) fly almost every day. What an experience that was! Love your channel.

  • @disbeatgaming7178
    @disbeatgaming7178 3 місяці тому +1

    funny thing is thats not the oldest military tech that the US still uses. the Browning M-2 Ma Deuce is still in use today and i think the fat electrician has a video on that as well.

  • @Westpark16
    @Westpark16 4 місяці тому +3

    Hes simply the best ❤him Every video he makes awesome

  • @jasonlengyel1104
    @jasonlengyel1104 4 місяці тому +2

    Glad you guys are back together

  • @FourFish47
    @FourFish47 4 місяці тому +2

    Same here Daz. Not only can I not understand how those big ass planes fly, but how do those big ass ships float???

  • @marlinblack6597
    @marlinblack6597 2 місяці тому

    It is actually called a Strike Eagle. It is a joint strike fighter as it can carry both A/A and A/G loadouts. It is capable of dog fights or long distance bombing raids with the addition of a fuel pod. Beautiful piece of machinery.

    • @stillmanfischer7978
      @stillmanfischer7978 2 місяці тому +1

      The F15E Variant is called the Strike Eagle. The F15 A-D models are just called Eagles

  • @stevemak8620
    @stevemak8620 4 місяці тому +3

    I live near PDX. They go vertical outside my back window almost daily. Makes one hell of a racket.

  • @Tijuanabill
    @Tijuanabill 4 місяці тому +4

    American Engineers: Here you go guys, the F-16 engine is the most powerful combat jet engine of all time. Have fun.
    American Generals: Are we just going to put one in there though? Can you draw something up with two?

  • @kshadejr
    @kshadejr 3 місяці тому

    The F=15 that flew and landed with a wing missing was an Israeli F-15. The pilot realized he had lost a wing when he was on approach for landing and began making his final approach and slowing because he was finding himself making unusual maneuvering adjustments. There was also an American U.S. Female Air Force Pilot over Iraq that flew her A-10 safely back to base with 3/4 of her right wing shot off over Southern Iraq. Power, Design Redundtcy & Training was the reason the A-10 stayed in the air and landed intact. Well, intact minus 3/4 of one wing.

  • @johnwilliamson2276
    @johnwilliamson2276 3 місяці тому

    The pilot didn’t know that one wing was missing. His wingman didn’t tell him for fear that he might crash when he over compensated for the missing wing.
    The manufacturer flew over to inspect the aircraft and when was told about the missing wing told them it was impossible to fly with only one wing. 😮

  • @cdpgeorge
    @cdpgeorge 17 днів тому

    When the baddest plane until proven other wise is a Grandpa. Respect your Grandpa's. He was bad ass.

  • @jaycooper2812
    @jaycooper2812 4 місяці тому +1

    The thing about the F-15 is that it has a very wide body that is shaped so that the body also generates Iift. The aircraft has enough power to generate the speed needed to create the lift needed to stay aloft. The Eagle that landed without it's wing landed at 350 miles per hour in order to retain control. The normal landing speed is 120 miles per hour.

  • @medicisdad1
    @medicisdad1 4 місяці тому +2

    As TFE says, "It's never a war crime; the first time."
    I'd say there is at least one incrementally "better" generation of aircraft currently in production. It will be SLOW because they are EXPENSIVE to build. You won't know they're out there until they are needed (See F117 in Panama). The reason things like the F15EX are getting done is because we aren't at the point to need to risk the F22s in "everyday" missions (again, think $$$). What we're doing now doesn't really require full time stealth. It requires a fast, heavily loaded, bomb truck that can defend itself against everything currently on the market AND take over as air superiority if challenged. And there you have it.

  • @kenbray1969
    @kenbray1969 3 місяці тому

    The F-15 has been upgraded and now does Mach 3 about 2500 miles per hour!!!

  • @TotallyNoCat
    @TotallyNoCat 4 місяці тому +3

    These guys are awesome, so many good Brit reaction channels.

  • @benpommer8902
    @benpommer8902 3 місяці тому

    If you ever find yourself in Suffolk, RAF Lakenheath, one of the USAF bases there, has a observation area where you can watch their fighters take off. If you're into it, I would highly recommend it.

  • @phildicks4721
    @phildicks4721 4 місяці тому +2

    Another video y'all might like is The Fat Electrician's video of the British Mosquito Fighter/Bomber of WWII. Its absolutely fascinating.

  • @nflr92
    @nflr92 4 місяці тому +2

    Plural of aircraft is.....aircraft. Thank you for attending my Ted Talk

  • @bleepbloop7039
    @bleepbloop7039 4 місяці тому +2

    5:30 on the point about military technology, its very true, only now are we seeing commercial augmented reality devices such as the new apple vision pro, but the very same technology had been given to F35 pilots for years earlier

  • @abmqa
    @abmqa 4 місяці тому +2

    As an Air Force veteran, my favorite plane is the SR-71 Blackbird. I was lucky enough to have worked with it. My 2nd favorite airplane is the F15 Eagle. Check out the C-5 Galaxy cargo jet.😊

  • @04m6gto
    @04m6gto 4 місяці тому +1

    The F-15 isn't the only fighter with a thrust to weight of greater than 1. Also, thrust had nothing to do with that missing wing F-15 still flying. It turns out that the F-15's fuselage creates enough lift that it can still fly with a missing wing. But it was also because of the Israeli pilot's skill. Still, the Eagle is one of the best fighters of all time.

  • @user-to4oz8ui9x
    @user-to4oz8ui9x 3 місяці тому

    The F15 CAN BREAK THE SOUND BARRIER in a vertical takeoff. I was at Edwards AFB as a Crew Cheif on Fighter Aircraft, when it was a Test Project.

  • @littlet1068
    @littlet1068 4 місяці тому +3

    One of our favorite plans..

  • @Svensk7119
    @Svensk7119 3 місяці тому +1

    A P-47 Thunderbolt collided with a chimney in WWII and lost part of its wing. It managed to land safely.

  • @groundhog7063
    @groundhog7063 3 місяці тому

    At the time, and maybe still, it was the only aircraft that could accellerate in a vertical climb. In other words, all other aircraft slow down when going straight up, it can accellerate.

  • @geoffroberts1126
    @geoffroberts1126 Місяць тому

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." Clarke's Third Law... Arthur C. Clarke

  • @Westpark16
    @Westpark16 4 місяці тому +3

    The Berlin Airlift great video by him and colabortive project UK and US.

  • @Titus-as-the-Roman
    @Titus-as-the-Roman 3 місяці тому +1

    After the wing incident it was said that many of the F-16 Israeli pilots wanted to switch to the F-15 , who could blame them

  • @jdbroders64
    @jdbroders64 4 місяці тому +2

    First review video I've watched since you've been back and it's great to see you mates! And Fat Electrician just rocks it with humor and facts.
    BTW, the F15 scared the crap out of everyone especially the Russians/Soviets back in the day. It was/is just a badass machine.

  • @MRBrien77
    @MRBrien77 4 місяці тому +3

    Funny thing is that it flew 10 miles with one wing well it can travel 10 miles in a matter of seconds. If it travels at over 1500 miles an hour that's equivalent to 25 miles per second

    • @patricktennant1585
      @patricktennant1585 4 місяці тому +1

      25 miles a minute. You need to divide by 60 again. .418 miles per sec

    • @MRBrien77
      @MRBrien77 4 місяці тому

      @@patricktennant1585 I didn't want to break it down that far lol

  • @agirlnamedbrett.
    @agirlnamedbrett. 3 місяці тому

    I've said the same about the fat electrician that he gives me Rob McElhenney vibes as well!
    Sounds like you might like a visit to the Wrights Brothers museum in Kill Devil Hills, NC if you make it over the pond again!

  • @mileswakefield2298
    @mileswakefield2298 4 місяці тому +1

    The Limping Lady by the Fat Electrician is an awesome true spy story that should be made into a movie.

  • @vincemac2223
    @vincemac2223 4 місяці тому +1

    If you want to see what the US might have, look up the " TR3-B Air Force Patents ". The Air Force said they never built it, but it sure does look and act like what 100k plus people saw fly over Phoenix Arizona. This thing will blow your mind.

  • @timothyblack3322
    @timothyblack3322 3 місяці тому

    He took my comment primarily with the F-15EX comment the last few seconds of his video. This F-15EX had some push back in Congress. But, the fleet of both the F-15 & F-18 are past their due date & stealth purposes are needed early in a conflict. However, being able to flex the muscle that a F-15EX provides, with modern technology installed at a fraction of the cost, and the jobs brought to a State/District: Will provide jobs which are a win/win situation for politicians. All the new technology & abilities that the F-15EX will have not been shared with the public yet. Test for the Jet are taking place out of Eglin Air Force Base in the Western Panhandle of Florida (near Panama City Beach). There are separate airframes NOS. 1, NOS. 3, and NOS. 4 have been delivered. Too date the F-15EX has past everything thrown at the jet. The Airforce intends to buy 104 jets, that is down from 188. COVID-19 & moving production out of South Korea to the U.S. has caused some delay. A total of 44 jets keeps the program within initial operation capability. The AF 2025 budget includes 24-48 jets with complete fulfillment of the 104 jets purchased by 2027. Indonesia has already expressed their intention to purchase the F-15EX.

  • @dobber43
    @dobber43 4 місяці тому +1

    I love his video on the last great warchief highly recommend

  • @TheTussman
    @TheTussman 4 місяці тому +2

    I still can't believe how airplanes in the 1910's were fitted with machine guns that shot *through* the props. No electronics either. How did they time this back then?!? Oh, I'm the opposite of a mechanical engineer, so...

    • @patricktennant1585
      @patricktennant1585 4 місяці тому +3

      They used a camshaft off of the engine to block the firing mechanism while the prop was in position. However many of the props had plates on the backside to protect them just in case of a hangfire.

    • @TheTussman
      @TheTussman 4 місяці тому

      I get that part, and thanks, but it's a high-RPM prop and a rapid-fire machine gun for goodness sakes, lol. Calculating the time for the bullet to "beat" the spinning prop blades just blows my mind!@@patricktennant1585

  • @oron61
    @oron61 2 місяці тому

    The story of its development in reaction
    to the Foxbat makes it even crazier. The US created it in a haste while soiling their pants over Soviet bragging over what turned out to be a an unmaneuverable interceptor instead of the super-fighter that they supposedly had.

  • @jamesallen5591
    @jamesallen5591 3 місяці тому

    The F-15 is a thing of beauty.

  • @jaycooper2812
    @jaycooper2812 4 місяці тому +1

    Think about it for a minute. The F-15 is 50 years old and is still one of the greatest aircraft in the world. The F-22 is now 20 years old and the F-35 has been flying for 10 years. The United States has been working on the replacement for the F-22 and F-35 for years now and the 50 year old Eagle is still good enough that they are coming out with an upgraded version in the F-15EX. The F-15 EX Eagle 2 is not as stealthy as the Raptor or Lightning II but it is 45 percent less visible than the older version and is actually as stealthy as the Russian SU-57 Felon and almost as invisible as the Chinese J-20. It also carries the same weapons load (24 missiles) as 4 F-22 Raptors (6 missiles each) or 6 F-35s (4 missiles each) It also costs less than half as much to operate ($24,000 per hour verses $87,000 per hour). The United States Air Force is buying up to 144 of the Eagle 2 to replace the older F-15 A and C models in service today. The Eagle 2 may not be as invisible as the Raptor or F-35 but it can hang back 15 miles behind the Raptor or Lightning and let the stealthier aircraft do the targeting for it. It basically can shorten the sortie times and requirements for the Raptor to return to base to reload weapons.

    • @noppornwongrassamee8941
      @noppornwongrassamee8941 4 місяці тому +1

      This makes me wonder if the F-15 is going to join the B-52 and A-10 as one of those seemingly immortal aircraft designs that see generations of would be successors come and go.

    • @ur_quainmaster7901
      @ur_quainmaster7901 3 місяці тому

      @@noppornwongrassamee8941 Very likely yes. The F-15 EX will have a life span of an unheard of (for a fighter) 20,000 flight hours. Large countries like Canada and Australia are missing out by not picking some up. No other plane would serve their interests as well with its range, versatility, and longevity.... not to mention the redundancy of two engines over remote terrain/ocean.

  • @Neodova
    @Neodova 4 місяці тому +1

    The best thing about American defense tech development is that we build the machines to outperform the machines our enemies and allies lie about developing as a chest beating tactic. lol

  • @zgwilley
    @zgwilley 4 місяці тому +5

    check out the most gangster marine by fat electrician

  • @jonadabtheunsightly
    @jonadabtheunsightly 4 місяці тому +1

    I don't think the UFO sightings are new (conventional manned) air superiority fighters. The reason I don't think so, is because the F-22 is pretty new and really good and is public knowledge. I think UFO sightings are more likely to be *other* kinds of experimental military aircraft, ones that are *not* public knowledge yet. (Also some of them are little-known atmospheric phenomena, pranks, weather balloons, hallucinations, birds, kites, and so on and so forth, because some people just have more imagination than discernment.)

  • @anthonyramirez9003
    @anthonyramirez9003 4 місяці тому +3

    Alien Technology!! 😆

  • @BiologistRyan
    @BiologistRyan 3 місяці тому

    a 747 can approach over a million pounds of weight at takeoff give or take. Or for you office gents 453,000kg The second fastest fighter I think we had was the f-4 phantom II. at mach 2.2ish.

  • @devinhart2418
    @devinhart2418 4 місяці тому +2

    The reactions are back!!!!

  • @corran9361
    @corran9361 4 місяці тому +1

    The Israeli pilot had to use afterburners to keep it level after training accident and land while using afterburners. The wing was replaced and continued to serve.

  • @dougking4377
    @dougking4377 3 місяці тому

    F-15 just 1 of a deadly fleet of aircraft you don't want heading your way. Imagine a radar operator seeing a swarm of bumblebees heading towards you of everything from F-15's to F-117's to B-2's all fully loaded.

  • @truckinfool3550
    @truckinfool3550 4 місяці тому +2

    Look up the story of the Israeli F-15 losing it’s wing.

  • @jonbrown3227
    @jonbrown3227 3 місяці тому

    Fun fact we are an estimated 300 years ahead of what’s publicly known 👍🏽 that information is slowly coming out in fragments. Any craft we know of publicly would almost be considered primitive in comparison to what is actually out there.

  • @pomztoybox6877
    @pomztoybox6877 4 місяці тому +1

    The F-4 Phantom was the same way. A metal bumblebee that only flies because of thrust.

    • @troymash8109
      @troymash8109 4 місяці тому

      When I was a kid in the 80s the elementary school was under the flight path of guys coming and going from Wright-Pat. The F-4s always had us craning our necks up to watch them roar past.

  • @Milleniumlance
    @Milleniumlance 4 місяці тому +3

    Wait til they see the NGAD its basically F22 on steroids

  • @scottstewart5784
    @scottstewart5784 4 місяці тому +1

    The F-15 is 50 years old. The design that is. The ones they're making right now, the F-15EX Eagle II, have current US tech except for stealth. Turns out the F-15 is a strong boi, for one so fast and quick and maneuverable. Carries almost 30,000 pounds (13,400 Kgs) of weapons or external fuel, which is good because the F-22 and the F-35 are relative weaklings because of stealth. The F-15EX can "stand off" and deliver long range precision strikes with data from the sneakier F-35 in danger close.

  • @davidmarquardt9034
    @davidmarquardt9034 3 місяці тому

    That 3,300mile is called the ferry range. We started doing that during WW 2 fuel tanks full but no bombs and gun unloaded to cut drag and weight to a minimum. Then refuel in Greenland or Iceland. A longer range plane, the P-38 or P-51 could make it non-stop if they didn't run into bad weather.

  • @DarkKatzy013
    @DarkKatzy013 4 місяці тому

    Love the react gents . awesome video .

  • @vinacar
    @vinacar 25 днів тому

    its like the last dog fighting jets

  • @thekevindeucey
    @thekevindeucey 4 місяці тому

    Glad you lads are back. We've missed you. ✌️

  • @quibblegaze
    @quibblegaze 4 місяці тому

    0:00: ⚡ Discussion on resuming reactions after a hiatus, focusing on a previous video about US Navy vs Iran's Navy.
    3:25: ✈️ F-15 Eagle: A powerhouse designed for air superiority with brute force and speed in the absence of stealth technology.
    5:18: ✈️ Unbelievable resilience of F-15 after midair collision leaves wing damaged, yet it lands safely.
    8:09: ✈️ F-15 Eagle boasts unmatched firepower and speed, defying design norms in American fighter jets.
    10:36: ⚡ Evolution of military technology showcasing superiority and future advancements.
    Timestamps by Tammy AI

  • @syx3s
    @syx3s 3 місяці тому

    if that plane had lost both wings even if it could stay in the air through sheer power it would be missing all roll control because of no ailerons and it would crash almost instantly. one wing it still has some roll authority so very careful and skilled piloting could be possible to fly.

  • @itsallconspiracy2035
    @itsallconspiracy2035 4 місяці тому

    Welcome back boys!!

  • @debbiewashabaugh9891
    @debbiewashabaugh9891 4 місяці тому

    When those planes take off and you’re standing at the end of the runway, it’s impressive.

    • @robdickinson9282
      @robdickinson9282 3 місяці тому

      You should try sitting under one while doing a double burner run a night. Not exactly legal but our QA guy was an F15 guy so he fudged for us.

  • @josephbucknavage6739
    @josephbucknavage6739 3 місяці тому

    I think you Brits if you haven't already, might enjoy the Fat Electrician's video on the Berlin Airlift.

  • @harrylangley3866
    @harrylangley3866 4 місяці тому

    Th F15 had a lifting body design,it was made to be a be able to fly less one wing

  • @etlarm5514
    @etlarm5514 4 місяці тому +1

    The F-22 is meant to replace the F-15C
    The F15-EX is more of a 4.5Gen than a 5th Gen fighter and would not be replaced until 6th generation are fully implemented.
    Also, The F-15 is what TOP GUN 2 use because it can house 2 people in its cockpit

    • @Hov0614
      @Hov0614 3 місяці тому

      They used an F/A-18F for the 2-person cockpit in Top Gun 2.

  • @KenSolans
    @KenSolans 4 місяці тому

    Off topic, as a front end developer, thank you for your comment at the end about building a website. When we do our job right, it isn't noticed. Or shouldn't be. So I do I appreciate that.

    • @Justanotherconsumer
      @Justanotherconsumer 3 місяці тому

      I work with product safety stuff.
      Same thing. No one notices you unless you screw up.

  • @terrywayneHamilton
    @terrywayneHamilton 3 місяці тому

    The airplane must be matched to a well trained aggressive pilot. Good Airplane, good armaments , good electronics , a well trained aggressive pilot and a little luck is a winning weapons system..

  • @KathrynLiz1
    @KathrynLiz1 3 місяці тому

    The only other pane that could go supersonic in a vertical climb was the English Electric Lightning. The F15 is still a great aircraft and will be in service a long time more.

  • @dondean8114
    @dondean8114 4 місяці тому

    You should see his video on the M50 Ontos "The Thing" as well as the De Haviland Mosquito.

  • @alannorris3819
    @alannorris3819 13 днів тому

    The F-15. The fighter jet built to defeat a lie.

  • @liftme225
    @liftme225 4 місяці тому

    reaction starts 3:11 Great reaction too

  • @jbcoker
    @jbcoker 3 місяці тому

    I have seen video of an F-4 Phantom airborne with both wings folded.

  • @coreyfisher2542
    @coreyfisher2542 4 місяці тому +2

    We don’t make sense, we make dollars. 😁

  • @killer99701
    @killer99701 4 місяці тому

    The pilot that flew with the missing wing was an Israeli pilot, and he lost the wing colliding with another plane. No one could tell how much damage was done until he landed

  • @A_Name_
    @A_Name_ 4 місяці тому

    @7:15 they actually flew it sideways. Aimed up so the engine could give it some extra vertical push. If they tried to fly it level you are right the wing that was still there would have tried to flip the plane.

  • @jreyman
    @jreyman 3 місяці тому

    The F15-with the missing wing was a result of a mid-air collision, where the right wing was severed from the rest of the aircraft.

  • @user-po3ev7is5w
    @user-po3ev7is5w 4 місяці тому +1

    Actually in most areas technology has NOT done much in the last 50 years. Other than the continual shrinking of circuits and the attendant advantages that brings, we have stagnated. No Concorde type transports, etc. We still have the same EXTREME limitations on space flight. We have actually gone backwards on energy generation systems.

  • @chrispruett81
    @chrispruett81 3 місяці тому +1

    I am lucky where I live in America/Arizona... I live on the outskirts of Phoenix (In the Desert) I have Military Jets fly over my house EVERY DAY... Throughout the day.. it's very cool!!

    • @johnwray393
      @johnwray393 3 місяці тому +1

      I feel like I'd love that for exactly 1 day before it got old and LOUD! Lol

    • @chrispruett81
      @chrispruett81 3 місяці тому

      @@johnwray393 I could see that.. it does get loud! lol.. See...I was like that at first.. but I have lived here for 21 years now... guess I am just used to it at this point! haha

  • @gabby15107
    @gabby15107 4 місяці тому

    Watching the military C-5 Galaxy fly is insane as well. They are a gigantic plane, and look like they are about to stall at 100 knots.